1
|
Seitz R, Gürtler L, Schramm W. COVID-19: A case for plasma derived natural anticoagulants? Biologicals 2024; 87:101781. [PMID: 38924809 DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2024.101781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Convalescent plasma was proposed for passive immunization against COVID-19; but so far there are conflicting results and still open questions. However, besides antibodies, other plasma proteins may be good candidates for further research and application. Thromboinflammation frequently complicates severe COVID-19, and classical anticoagulants like heparins seem to have limited effect. The natural protease inhibitors antithrombin III (ATIII), α1-antitrypsin (α1-AT) and α2-macroglobulin (α2-M), which are found decreased in severe COVD-19, play a crucial role in prothrombotic and inflammatory pathways. While ATIII and α1-AT are licensed as commercially prepared therapeutic concentrates, there is no preparation of α2-M available. The diagnostic, prognostic, and even therapeutic potential of plasma protease inhibitors should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lutz Gürtler
- Max von Pettenkofer Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schramm
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) and Rudolf Marx Stiftung C/o SOGZ München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arevalo-Romero JA, Chingaté-López SM, Camacho BA, Alméciga-Díaz CJ, Ramirez-Segura CA. Next-generation treatments: Immunotherapy and advanced therapies for COVID-19. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26423. [PMID: 38434363 PMCID: PMC10907543 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in 2019 following prior outbreaks of coronaviruses like SARS and MERS in recent decades, underscoring their high potential of infectivity in humans. Insights from previous outbreaks of SARS and MERS have played a significant role in developing effective strategies to mitigate the global impact of SARS-CoV-2. As of January 7, 2024, there have been 774,075,242 confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide. To date, 13.59 billion vaccine doses have been administered, and there have been 7,012,986 documented fatalities (https://www.who.int/) Despite significant progress in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 challenges human defenses, presenting ongoing global challenges. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 lineages, shaped by mutation and recombination processes, has led to successive waves of infections. This scenario reveals the need for next-generation vaccines as a crucial requirement for ensuring ongoing protection against SARS-CoV-2. This demand calls for formulations that trigger a robust adaptive immune response without leading the acute inflammation linked with the infection. Key mutations detected in the Spike protein, a critical target for neutralizing antibodies and vaccine design -specifically within the Receptor Binding Domain region of Omicron variant lineages (B.1.1.529), currently dominant worldwide, have intensified concerns due to their association with immunity evasion from prior vaccinations and infections. As the world deals with this evolving threat, the narrative extends to the realm of emerging variants, each displaying new mutations with implications that remain largely misunderstood. Notably, the JN.1 Omicron lineage is gaining global prevalence, and early findings suggest it stands among the immune-evading variants, a characteristic attributed to its mutation L455S. Moreover, the detrimental consequences of the novel emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages bear a particularly critical impact on immunocompromised individuals and older adults. Immunocompromised individuals face challenges such as suboptimal responses to COVID-19 vaccines, rendering them more susceptible to severe disease. Similarly, older adults have an increased risk of severe disease and the presence of comorbid conditions, find themselves at a heightened vulnerability to develop COVID-19 disease. Thus, recognizing these intricate factors is crucial for effectively tailoring public health strategies to protect these vulnerable populations. In this context, this review aims to describe, analyze, and discuss the current progress of the next-generation treatments encompassing immunotherapeutic approaches and advanced therapies emerging as complements that will offer solutions to counter the disadvantages of the existing options. Preliminary outcomes show that these strategies target the virus and address the immunomodulatory responses associated with COVID-19. Furthermore, the capacity to promote tissue repair has been demonstrated, which can be particularly noteworthy for immunocompromised individuals who stand as vulnerable actors in the global landscape of coronavirus infections. The emerging next-generation treatments possess broader potential, offering protection against a wide range of variants and enhancing the ability to counter the impact of the constant evolution of the virus. Furthermore, advanced therapies are projected as potential treatment alternatives for managing Chronic Post-COVID-19 syndromeand addressing its associated long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Andrea Arevalo-Romero
- Laboratorio de Investigación en Ingeniería Celular y Molecular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud, IDCBIS, 111611, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
- Instituto de Errores Innatos del Metabolismo, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 110231, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Sandra M. Chingaté-López
- Laboratorio de Investigación en Ingeniería Celular y Molecular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud, IDCBIS, 111611, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| | - Bernardo Armando Camacho
- Laboratorio de Investigación en Ingeniería Celular y Molecular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud, IDCBIS, 111611, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| | - Carlos Javier Alméciga-Díaz
- Instituto de Errores Innatos del Metabolismo, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 110231, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Cesar A. Ramirez-Segura
- Laboratorio de Investigación en Ingeniería Celular y Molecular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud, IDCBIS, 111611, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seitz R, Gürtler L, Vahlensieck U, Hilger A, Schramm W. Too Early to Abandon Convalescent Plasma for Supportive Treatment of COVID-19. Transfus Med Hemother 2023; 50:0. [PMID: 38306192 PMCID: PMC10826597 DOI: 10.1159/000530097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The authors of a systematic review and meta-analysis conclude that the benefit of convalescent plasma (CP) in the treatment of COVID-19 is limited. Among other systematic reviews, only one found an indication of benefit of CP. However, a meta-analysis needs a focused and meaningful clinical question and should include studies which are designed to test a reasonable hypothesis. Clinical trials to support the licensing of medicines should aim to define as exactly as possible the investigational drug and target disease. In the case of COVID-19, trial details (e.g., duration, stage and severity of disease, and antibody content and dose of CP) are quite heterogeneous. The so far available evidence suggests that the hypothesis should be sharpened as to treat COVID -19 patients at risk for developing severe disease as early enough with a sufficiently high dose of specific antibodies. It has been demonstrated that such an approach is feasible, and the lack of an independent reproduction by further trials with a really comparable design can probably not be compensated by compiling all available, heterogenous trials, even with the best methodology of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Though the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be fading, we should not neglect the search for effective prevention and treatments, given the still high death toll of COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies were found effective in the early phase of the pandemic; however, due to new variants of SARS-COV2 undermining their efficacy they are no longer recommended by the current NIH guidelines. CP can provide a spectrum of polyclonal antibodies in close timely and regional connection to the particular prevalent virus variant. It would be extremely valuable to obtain a solid scientific foundation for the principle of target specific and temporarily adapted passive immunization, which could be a fast and flexible instrument also in future outbreaks of novel pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Seitz
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | - Lutz Gürtler
- Max von Pettenkofer Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Vahlensieck
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | - Anneliese Hilger
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schramm
- Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) and Rudolf Marx Stiftung, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grubovic Rastvorceva RM, Useini S, Stevanovic M, Demiri I, Petkovic E, Franchini M, Focosi D. Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Hospitalized Patients-An Open-Label Phase II Clinical Trial. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:1565. [PMID: 36295001 PMCID: PMC9605182 DOI: 10.3390/life12101565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is an important antiviral option for selected patients with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: In this open-label, phase 2, clinical trial conducted from 30 April 2020 till 10 May 2021 in the Republic of North Macedonia, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of CCP in hospitalized patients. Treatment was with a single unit of CCP having an anti-RBD IgG concentration higher than 5 AU/mL. Results: There were 189 patients that completed the study, of which 65 (34.4%) had WHO 8-point clinical progression scale score of 3 (requiring hospital care but not oxygen support), 65 (34.4%) had a score of 4 (hospitalized and requiring supplemental oxygen by mask or nasal prongs), and 59 (31.2%) had a score of 5 (hospitalized and requiring supplemental oxygen by non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen). Mean age was 57 years (range 22−94), 78.5% were males, 80.4% had elevated body mass index, and 70.9% had comorbidity. Following CCP transfusion, we observed clinical improvement with increase rates in oxygenation-free days of 32.3% and 58.5% at 24 h and seven days after CCP transfusion, a decline in WHO scores, and reduced progression to severe disease (only one patient was admitted to ICU after CCP transfusion). Mortality in the entire cohort was 11.6% (22/189). We recorded 0% mortality in WHO score 3 (0/65) and in patients that received CCP transfusion in the first seven days of disease, 4.6% mortality in WHO score 4 (3/65), and 30.5% mortality in WHO score 5 (18/59). Mortality correlated with WHO score (Chi-square 19.3, p < 0.001) and with stay in the ICU (Chi-square 55.526, p ≤ 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This study showed that early administration of CCP to patients with moderate disease was a safe and potentially effective treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04397523).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rada M. Grubovic Rastvorceva
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine of RNM, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Goce Delcev, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia
| | - Sedula Useini
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine of RNM, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Milena Stevanovic
- University Clinic for Infectious Diseases, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Ilir Demiri
- University Clinic for Infectious Diseases, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Elena Petkovic
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine of RNM, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
| | | | - Daniele Focosi
- North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbasi F, Adatorwovor R, Davarpanah MA, Mansoori Y, Hajiani M, Azodi F, Sefidbakht S, Davoudi S, Rezaei F, Mohammadmoradi S, Asadipooya K. A Randomized Trial of Combination Therapy, Sitagliptin and Spironolactone, in Hospitalized Adult Patients with COVID-19. J Endocr Soc 2022; 6:bvac017. [PMID: 35261932 PMCID: PMC8898039 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Context COVID-19 may cause respiratory distress syndrome and death. Treatment of COVID-19 to prevent complications remains a priority. Objective Our investigation sought to determine whether combination of spironolactone and sitagliptin could reduce mortality for inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This single-blind, 4-arm, prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at Shiraz and Bushehr University of Medical Sciences hospitals between December 2020 and April 2021. We randomized hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia into 4 groups: control, combination therapy, sitagliptin add-on, or spironolactone add-on. The primary outcome was the clinical improvement of the patients in the hospital as measured on an 8-point numerical scale. The secondary outcomes included intubation, ICU admission, end organ damages, CT findings, and paraclinical information. Results A total of 263 admitted patients were randomly assigned to control group (87 patients), combination group (60 patients), sitagliptin group (66 patients), and spironolactone group (50 patients). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for higher age in control group. The intervention groups, especially combination therapy, had better clinical outcomes (clinical score on fifth day of admission: 3.11 ± 2.45 for controls, 1.33 ± 0.50 for combination, 1.68 ± 1.02 for sitagliptin, and 1.64 ± 0.81 for spironolactone; P = 0.004). However, the mortality rate was lower in patients who received spironolactone (21.84% control, 13.33% combination, 13.64% sitagliptin, 10.00% spironolactone; P = 0.275). Our intervention reduced lung infiltration but not the area of involvement in lungs. Conclusion Sitagliptin and spironolactone can potentially improve clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Abbasi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | | | | | | | | | - Farzan Azodi
- Faculty of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Sepideh Sefidbakht
- Medical Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | | | - Shayan Mohammadmoradi
- Saha Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Kamyar Asadipooya
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Barnstable Brown Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11091663. [PMID: 34574004 PMCID: PMC8467957 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Convalescent plasma (CP) from patients recovered from COVID-19 is one of the most studied anti-viral therapies against SARS-COV-2 infection. The aim of this study is to summarize the evidence from the available systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of CP in COVID-19 through an overview of the published systematic reviews (SRs). A systematic literature search was conducted up to August 2021 in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Medrxiv databases to identify systematic reviews focusing on CP use in COVID-19. Two review authors independently evaluated reviews for inclusion, extracted data and assessed quality of evidence using AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Reviews) and GRADE tools. The following outcomes were analyzed: mortality, viral clearance, clinical improvement, length of hospital stay, adverse reactions. In addition, where possible, subgroup analyses were performed according to study design (e.g., RCTs vs. non-RCTs), CP neutralizing antibody titer and timing of administration, and disease severity. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the checklist for systematic reviews AMSTAR-2 and the GRADE assessment. Overall, 29 SRs met the inclusion criteria based on 53 unique primary studies (17 RCT and 36 non-RCT). Limitations to the methodological quality of reviews most commonly related to absence of a protocol (11/29) and funding sources of primary studies (27/29). Of the 89 analyses on which GRADE judgements were made, effect estimates were judged to be of high/moderate certainty in four analyses, moderate in 38, low in 38, very low in nine. Despite the variability in the certainty of the evidence, mostly related to the risk of bias and inconsistency, the results of this umbrella review highlight a mortality reduction in CP over standard therapy when administered early and at high titer, without increased adverse reactions.
Collapse
|