Rifampin Drug-Drug-Interaction Studies: Reflections on the Nitrosamine Impurities Issue

Effect of Carbamazepine on the Pharmacokinetics of Erdafitinib in Healthy Participants

Erdafitinib, a selective and potent oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is metabolized mainly through CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 enzymes. This phase 1, open-label, single-sequence, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single oral dose of erdafitinib alone and when co-administered with steady state oral carbamazepine, a dual inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, in 13 healthy adult participants (NCT04330248). Compared with erdafitinib administration alone, carbamazepine co-administration decreased total and free maximum plasma concentrations of erdafitinib (Cmax) by 35% (95% CI 30%-39%) and 22% (95% CI 17%-27%), respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve over the time interval from 0 to 168 hours, to the last quantifiable data point, and to time infinity (AUC168h, AUClast, AUCinf), were markedly decreased for both total erdafitinib (56%-62%) and free erdafitinib (48%-55%). The safety profile of erdafitinib was consistent with previous clinical studies in healthy participants, with no new safety concerns when administered with or without carbamazepine. Co-administration with carbamazepine may reduce the activity of erdafitinib due to reduced exposure. Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inducers with erdafitinib should be avoided.

Innovative Approaches to Optimize Clinical Transporter Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Of the 450 cell membrane transporters responsible for shuttling substrates, nutrients, hormones, neurotransmitters, antioxidants, and signaling molecules, approximately nine are associated with clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to their role in drug and metabolite transport. Therefore, a clinical study evaluating potential transporter DDIs is recommended if an investigational product is intestinally absorbed, undergoes renal or hepatic elimination, or is suspected to either be a transporter substrate or perpetrator. However, many of the transporter substrates and inhibitors administered during a DDI study also affect cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity, which can complicate data interpretation. To overcome these challenges, the assessment of endogenous biomarkers can help elucidate the mechanism of complex DDIs when multiple transporters or CYPs may be involved. This perspective article will highlight how creative study designs are currently being utilized to address complex transporter DDIs and the role of physiology-based -pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can play.

Comprehensive Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Assess Drug-Drug Interactions of Phenytoin

Regulatory agencies worldwide expect that clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between an investigational new drug and other drugs should be conducted during drug development as part of an adequate assessment of the drug's safety and efficacy. However, it is neither time nor cost efficient to test all possible DDI scenarios clinically. Phenytoin is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as a strong clinical index inducer of CYP3A4, and a moderate sensitive substrate of CYP2C9. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) platform model was developed using GastroPlus® to assess DDIs with phenytoin acting as the victim (CYP2C9, CYP2C19) or perpetrator (CYP3A4). Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 15 different studies in healthy subjects. The PBPK model of phenytoin explains the contribution of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 to the formation of 5-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin. Furthermore, it accurately recapitulated phenytoin exposure after single and multiple intravenous and oral doses/formulations ranging from 248 to 900 mg, the dose-dependent nonlinearity and the magnitude of the effect of food on phenytoin pharmacokinetics. Once developed and verified, the model was used to characterize and predict phenytoin DDIs with fluconazole, omeprazole and itraconazole, i.e., simulated/observed DDI AUC ratio ranging from 0.89 to 1.25. This study supports the utility of the PBPK approach in informing drug development.

Current Threat of Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals and Scientific Strategies for Risk Mitigation

The current global situation of nitrosamine contamination has expanded from angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) to wide range of medicines as the risk of contamination via the drug substances, formulation, manufacturing process, and packaging is possible for many drug products. The understanding of chemistry, toxicology, and root causes of nitrosamines are mandatory to effectively evaluate and mitigate the risks associated with the contaminated mutagen. Lessons learnt and scientific findings from previously identified root causes are good examples on how to perform effective risk assessments and establish control strategies. Addressing the risk of nitrosamine contamination in pharmaceuticals requires significant knowledge and considerable resources to collect the necessary information for risk evaluation. Examples of the resources required include a reliable laboratory facility, reference material, highly specific and sensitive instrumentation able handle trace levels of contamination, data management, and the most limited resource - time. Therefore, the supporting tools to assist with risk assessment e.g., shared databases for drug and excipients in concern, screening models for the determination of nitrosamine formation potential, and an in silico model to help with toxicity estimation, have proven to be beneficial to tackle the risk and concern of nitrosamine contamination in pharmaceuticals.

The Impact of N-nitrosamine Impurities on Clinical Drug Development

Over the past few years, an increasing number of commercially available drugs have been reported to contain N-nitrosamine impurities above acceptable intake limits. Consequent interruption or discontinuation of the manufacturing and distribution of several marketed drugs has culminated into shortages of marketed drugs, including the antidiabetic drug metformin and the potentially life-saving drug rifampin for the treatment of tuberculosis. Alarmingly, the clinical development of new investigational products has been complicated as well by the presence of N-nitrosamine impurities in batches of marketed drug. In particular, rifampin is a key clinical index drug employed in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies, and as a result of nitrosamine impurities regulatory bodies no longer accept the administration of rifampin in DDI studies involving healthy subjects. Drug developers are now forced to look at alternative approaches for commonly employed perpetrators, which will be discussed in this review.

Alternatives to rifampicin: A review and perspectives on the choice of strong CYP3A inducers for clinical drug-drug interaction studies

N-Nitrosamine (NA) impurities are considered genotoxic and have gained attention due to the recall of several marketed drug products associated with higher-than-permitted limits of these impurities. Rifampicin is an index inducer of multiple cytochrome P450s (CYPs) including CYP2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4/5 and an inhibitor of OATP1B transporters (single dose). Hence, rifampicin is used extensively in clinical studies to assess drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Despite NA impurities being reported in rifampicin and rifapentine above the acceptable limits, these critical anti-infective drugs are available for therapeutic use considering their benefit-risk profile. Reports of NA impurities in rifampicin products have created uncertainty around using rifampicin in clinical DDI studies, especially in healthy volunteers. Hence, a systematic investigation through a literature search was performed to determine possible alternative index inducer(s) to rifampicin. The available strong CYP3A inducers were selected from the University of Washington DDI Database and their in vivo DDI potential assessed using the data from clinical DDI studies with sensitive CYP3A substrates. To propose potential alternative CYP3A inducers, factors including lack of genotoxic potential, adequate safety, feasibility of multiple dose administration to healthy volunteers, and robust in vivo evidence of induction of CYP3A were considered. Based on the qualifying criteria, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lumacaftor were identified to be the most promising alternatives to rifampicin for conducting CYP3A induction DDI studies. Strengths and limitations of the proposed alternative CYP3A inducers, the magnitude of in vivo CYP3A induction, appropriate study designs for each alternative inducer, and future perspectives are presented in this paper.