Drug Transporters: Advances and Opportunities

Coordinate regulation of systemic and kidney tryptophan metabolism by the drug transporters OAT1 and OAT3

How organs sense circulating metabolites is a key question. Here, we show that the multispecific organic anion transporters of drugs, OAT1 (SLC22A6 or NKT) and OAT3 (SLC22A8), play a role in organ sensing. Metabolomics analyses of the serum of Oat1 and Oat3 knockout mice revealed changes in tryptophan derivatives involved in metabolism and signaling. Several of these metabolites are derived from the gut microbiome and are implicated as uremic toxins in chronic kidney disease. Direct interaction with the transporters was supported with cell-based transport assays. To assess the impact of the loss of OAT1 or OAT3 function on the kidney, an organ where these uptake transporters are highly expressed, knockout transcriptomic data were mapped onto a “metabolic task”-based computational model that evaluates over 150 cellular functions. Despite the changes of tryptophan metabolites in both knockouts, only in the Oat1 knockout were multiple tryptophan-related cellular functions increased. Thus, deprived of the ability to take up kynurenine, kynurenate, anthranilate, and N-formylanthranilate through OAT1, the kidney responds by activating its own tryptophan-related biosynthetic pathways. The results support the Remote Sensing and Signaling Theory, which describes how “drug” transporters help optimize levels of metabolites and signaling molecules by facilitating organ cross talk. Since OAT1 and OAT3 are inhibited by many drugs, the data implies potential for drug–metabolite interactions. Indeed, treatment of humans with probenecid, an OAT-inhibitor used to treat gout, elevated circulating tryptophan metabolites. Furthermore, given that regulatory agencies have recommended drugs be tested for OAT1 and OAT3 binding or transport, it follows that these metabolites can be used as endogenous biomarkers to determine if drug candidates interact with OAT1 and/or OAT3.

A Network of SLC and ABC Transporter and DME Genes Involved in Remote Sensing and Signaling in the Gut-Liver-Kidney Axis

Genes central to drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (ADME) also regulate numerous endogenous molecules. The Remote Sensing and Signaling Hypothesis argues that an ADME gene-centered network—including SLC and ABC “drug” transporters, “drug” metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), and regulatory genes—is essential for inter-organ communication via metabolites, signaling molecules, antioxidants, gut microbiome products, uremic solutes, and uremic toxins. By cross-tissue co-expression network analysis, the gut, liver, and kidney (GLK) formed highly connected tissue-specific clusters of SLC transporters, ABC transporters, and DMEs. SLC22, SLC25 and SLC35 families were network hubs, having more inter-organ and intra-organ connections than other families. Analysis of the GLK network revealed key physiological pathways (e.g., involving bile acids and uric acid). A search for additional genes interacting with the network identified HNF4α, HNF1α, and PXR. Knockout gene expression data confirmed ~60–70% of predictions of ADME gene regulation by these transcription factors. Using the GLK network and known ADME genes, we built a tentative gut-liver-kidney “remote sensing and signaling network” consisting of SLC and ABC transporters, as well as DMEs and regulatory proteins. Together with protein-protein interactions to prioritize likely functional connections, this network suggests how multi-specificity combines with oligo-specificity and mono-specificity to regulate homeostasis of numerous endogenous small molecules.

Generation of a Small Library of Natural Products Designed to Cover Chemical Space Inexpensively

Natural products space includes at least 200,000 compounds and the structures of most of these compounds are available in digital format. Previous analyses showed (i) that although they were capable of taking up synthetic pharmaceutical drugs, such exogenous molecules were likely the chief ‘natural’ substrates in the evolution of the transporters used to gain cellular entry by pharmaceutical drugs, and (ii) that a relatively simple but rapid clustering algorithm could produce clusters from which individual elements might serve to form a representative library covering natural products space. This exploited the fact that the larger clusters were likely to be formed early in evolution (and hence to have been accompanied by suitable transporters), so that very small clusters, including singletons, could be ignored. In the latter work, we assumed that the molecule chosen might be that in the middle of the cluster. However, this ignored two other criteria, namely the commercial availability and the financial cost of the individual elements of these clusters. We here develop a small representative library in which we to seek to satisfy the somewhat competing criteria of coverage (‘representativeness’), availability and cost. It is intended that the library chosen might serve as a testbed of molecules that may or may not be substrates for known or orphan drug transporters. A supplementary spreadsheet provides details, and their availability via a particular supplier.

Analysis of drug-endogenous human metabolite similarities in terms of their maximum common substructures

In previous work, we have assessed the structural similarities between marketed drugs (‘drugs’) and endogenous natural human metabolites (‘metabolites’ or ‘endogenites’), using ‘fingerprint’ methods in common use, and the Tanimoto and Tversky similarity metrics, finding that the fingerprint encoding used had a dramatic effect on the apparent similarities observed. By contrast, the maximal common substructure (MCS), when the means of determining it is fixed, is a means of determining similarities that is largely independent of the fingerprints, and also has a clear chemical meaning. We here explored the utility of the MCS and metrics derived therefrom. In many cases, a shared scaffold helps cluster drugs and endogenites, and gives insight into enzymes (in particular transporters) that they both share. Tanimoto and Tversky similarities based on the MCS tend to be smaller than those based on the MACCS fingerprint-type encoding, though the converse is also true for a significant fraction of the comparisons. While no single molecular descriptor can account for these differences, a machine learning-based analysis of the nature of the differences (MACCS_Tanimoto vs MCS_Tversky) shows that they are indeed deterministic, although the features that are used in the model to account for this vary greatly with each individual drug. The extent of its utility and interpretability vary with the drug of interest, implying that while MCS is neither ‘better’ nor ‘worse’ for every drug–endogenite comparison, it is sufficiently different to be of value. The overall conclusion is thus that the use of the MCS provides an additional and valuable strategy for understanding the structural basis for similarities between synthetic, marketed drugs and natural intermediary metabolites.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT), the definitive and timely source for advances in human therapeutics, transcends the drug discovery, development, regulation, and utilization continuum to catalyze, evolve, and disseminate discipline-transformative knowledge. Prioritized themes and multidisciplinary content drive the science and practice of clinical pharmacology, offering a trusted point of reference. An authoritative herald across global communities, CPT is a timeless information vehicle at the vanguard of discovery, translation, and application ushering therapeutic innovation into modern healthcare.