1
|
Bhadra S, Paik I, Torres JA, Fadanka S, Gandini C, Akligoh H, Molloy J, Ellington AD. Preparation and Use of Cellular Reagents: A Low-resource Molecular Biology Reagent Platform. Curr Protoc 2022; 2:e387. [PMID: 35263038 PMCID: PMC9094432 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Protein reagents are indispensable for most molecular and synthetic biology procedures. Most conventional protocols rely on highly purified protein reagents that require considerable expertise, time, and infrastructure to produce. In consequence, most proteins are acquired from commercial sources, reagent expense is often high, and accessibility may be hampered by shipping delays, customs barriers, geopolitical constraints, and the need for a constant cold chain. Such limitations to the widespread availability of protein reagents, in turn, limit the expansion and adoption of molecular biology methods in research, education, and technology development and application. Here, we describe protocols for producing a low-resource and locally sustainable reagent delivery system, termed "cellular reagents," in which bacteria engineered to overexpress proteins of interest are dried and can then be used directly as reagent packets in numerous molecular biology reactions, without the need for protein purification or a constant cold chain. As an example of their application, we describe the execution of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) using cellular reagents, detailing how to replace pure protein reagents with optimal amounts of rehydrated cellular reagents. We additionally describe a do-it-yourself fluorescence visualization device for using these cellular reagents in common molecular biology applications. The methods presented in this article can be used for low-cost, on-site production of commonly used molecular biology reagents (including DNA and RNA polymerases, reverse transcriptases, and ligases) with minimal instrumentation and expertise, and without the need for protein purification. Consequently, these methods should generally make molecular biology reagents more affordable and accessible. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of cellular reagents Alternate Protocol 1: Preparation of lyophilized cellular reagents Alternate Protocol 2: Evaluation of bacterial culture growth via comparison to McFarland turbidity standards Support Protocol 1: SDS-PAGE for protein expression analysis of cellular reagents Basic Protocol 2: Using Taq DNA polymerase cellular reagents for PCR Basic Protocol 3: Using Br512 DNA polymerase cellular reagents for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) Support Protocol 2: Building a fluorescence visualization device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanchita Bhadra
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America,Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America,Corresponding authors: ,
| | - Inyup Paik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America,Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Jose-Angel Torres
- Freshman Research Initiative, DIY Diagnostics Stream, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | | | - Chiara Gandini
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Harry Akligoh
- Hive Biolab, Hse 49, SE 29056 Drive, 2nd Turn Behind Mizpah School, Kentinkrono, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Jenny Molloy
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew D. Ellington
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America,Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America,Corresponding authors: ,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zepeda B, Verdonk JC. RNA Extraction from Plant Tissue with Homemade Acid Guanidinium Thiocyanate Phenol Chloroform (AGPC). Curr Protoc 2022; 2:e351. [PMID: 35077031 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Gene expression studies are a powerful technique to study biological processes, and isolating RNA that is pure, intact, and in sufficient amounts for downstream applications is key. Over the years, the field has moved to the use of commercial kits and ready-made extraction buffers for RNA isolation. This became particularly problematic during the COVID-19 crisis when supply chains were affected and when RNA extraction and analysis reagents were suddenly scarce at a time when they were particularly required. Acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (AGPC) is one of the oldest RNA extraction solutions, in use since 1987. It is known as a ready-made solution, sold under different brand names, and is typically the most expensive reagent in the RNA extraction process. In this article, we describe how to prepare a low-cost homemade AGPC solution and provide tips on how to use it for obtaining high-quality RNA, as well as describe possible modifications for different conditions. The protocol is based on a phase separation, where RNA is maintained in the aqueous phase and DNA and proteins remain in the interphase and organic phase. After cleaning, precipitation, and resuspension steps, the RNA is ready to be quantified and used for downstream applications. By following this protocol, good yields of high-quality RNA can be obtained from a wide variety of tissues and organisms, and we exemplify the approach here using plant tissues. Some plant tissues contain extra interferents (such as sugars), and for high-quality RNA isolation from those tissues, an alternate protocol is provided. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: RNA isolation with homemade acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (AGPC) Alternate Protocol: RNA isolation from high carbohydrate-containing tissues using an NTES-AGPC combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baltasar Zepeda
- Horticulture and Product Physiology, Plant Science Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Julian C Verdonk
- Horticulture and Product Physiology, Plant Science Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mote RD, Laxmikant VS, Singh SB, Tiwari M, Singh H, Srivastava J, Tripathi V, Seshadri V, Majumdar A, Subramanyam D. A cost-effective and efficient approach for generating and assembling reagents for conducting real-time PCR. J Biosci 2021. [PMID: 34845993 PMCID: PMC8626763 DOI: 10.1007/s12038-021-00231-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Real-time PCR is a widely used technique for quantification of gene expression. However, commercially available kits for real-time PCR are very expensive. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has severely hampered the economy in a number of developing countries, resulting in a reduction in available research funding. The fallout of this will result in limiting educational institutes and small enterprises from using cutting edge biological techniques such as real-time PCR. Here, we report a cost-effective approach for preparing and assembling cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR mastermixes with similar efficiencies as commercially available kits. Our results thus demonstrate an alternative to commercially available kits.
Collapse
|
4
|
Makela M, Lin Z, Lin PT. Surface Functionalized Anodic Aluminum Oxide Membrane for Opto-Nanofluidic SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Target Detection. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL 2021; 21:22645-22650. [PMID: 35789083 PMCID: PMC8769019 DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3109022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
An ultra-thin and highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 detection platform was demonstrated using a nano-porous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membrane. The membrane surface was functionalized to enable efficient trapping and identification of SARS-CoV-2 genomic targets through DNA-DNA and DNA-RNA hybridization. To immobilize the probe oligonucleotides on the AAO membrane, the pore surface was first coated with the linking reagents, 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) and glutaraldehyde (GA), by a compact vacuum infiltration module. After that, complementary target oligos with fluorescent modifier was pulled and infiltrated into the nano-fluidic channels formed by the AAO pores. The fluorescent signal applying the AAO membrane sensors was two orders stronger than a flat glass template. In addition, the dependence between the nano-pore size and the fluorescent intensity was evaluated. The optimized pore diameter d is 200 nm, which can accommodate the assembled oligonucleotide and aminosilane layers without blocking the AAO nano-fluidic channels. Our DNA functionalized membrane sensor is an accurate and high throughput platform supporting rapid virus tests, which is critical for population-wide diagnostic applications result in a page being rejected by search engines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Makela
- Center for Remote Health Technologies and SystemsDepartment of Materials Science and EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USA
| | - Zhihai Lin
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USA
| | - Pao Tai Lin
- Center for Remote Health Technologies and SystemsDepartment of Materials Science and EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USA
- Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Materials Science and EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX77843USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Graham TG, Dugast‐Darzacq C, Dailey GM, Darzacq X, Tjian R. Simple, Inexpensive RNA Isolation and One-Step RT-qPCR Methods for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and General Use. Curr Protoc 2021; 1:e130. [PMID: 33905620 PMCID: PMC8206771 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The most common method for RNA detection involves reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis. Commercial one-step master mixes-which include both a reverse transcriptase and a thermostable polymerase and thus allow performing both the RT and qPCR steps consecutively in a sealed well-are key reagents for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing; yet, these are typically expensive and have been affected by supply shortages in periods of high demand. As an alternative, we describe here how to express and purify Taq polymerase and M-MLV reverse transcriptase and assemble a homemade one-step RT-qPCR master mix. This mix can be easily assembled from scratch in any laboratory equipped for protein purification. We also describe two simple alternative methods to prepare clinical swab samples for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-qPCR: heat-inactivation for direct addition, and concentration of RNA by isopropanol precipitation. Finally, we describe how to perform RT-qPCR using the homemade master mix, how to prepare in vitro-transcribed RNA standards, and how to use a fluorescence imager for endpoint detection of RT-PCR amplification in the absence of a qPCR machine In addition to being useful for diagnostics, these versatile protocols may be adapted for nucleic acid quantification in basic research. © 2021 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of a one-step RT-qPCR master mix using homemade enzymes Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of swab samples for direct RT-PCR Alternate Protocol 1: Concentration of RNA from swab samples by isopropanol precipitation Basic Protocol 3: One-step RT-qPCR of RNA samples using a real-time thermocycler Support Protocol: Preparation of RNA concentration standards by in vitro transcription Alternate Protocol 2: One-step RT-PCR using endpoint fluorescence detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G.W. Graham
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 475D Li Ka Shing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCalifornia
| | - Claire Dugast‐Darzacq
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 475D Li Ka Shing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCalifornia
| | - Gina M. Dailey
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 475D Li Ka Shing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCalifornia
| | - Xavier Darzacq
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 475D Li Ka Shing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCalifornia
| | - Robert Tjian
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 475D Li Ka Shing CenterUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCalifornia
| |
Collapse
|