Partial-mouth periodontal examination protocol for estimating periodontitis extent and severity in a US population

Accuracy of Estimating Periodontitis and Its Risk Association Using Partial-Mouth Recordings for Surveillance Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

Our aim is to conduct an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis pertaining to the accuracy of using the partial-mouth recording protocol (PRP) in surveillance studies to estimate the periodontitis prevalence, extent, severity, and its risk associations.

Methods

Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies which assessed the periodontitis prevalence, severity, extent, or its risk associations using PRPs versus full-mouth recording protocols (FRPs); searches were conducted up until May 26, 2021. The risk of bias and the applicability of the studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Both qualitative data synthesis and quantitative data synthesis were performed, and comparisons were done for the accuracy and precision of PRPs for different periodontitis outcomes. The study's protocol was registered through the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (registration number: INPLASY202160032).

Results

A total of 14 studies were included. The studies had a considerable degree of heterogeneity, along with a moderate risk of bias and applicability concerns. Several factors influenced the accuracy or precision of using PRPs, including the age, distribution of periodontitis in the studied population, PRP selection, total PRP sites, the threshold for minimum sites with CAL, and the severity of periodontitis case definitions. Overall, the PRP with the highest accuracy and precision mainly included (1) a full-mouth protocol at the following partial sites: mesiobuccal-midbuccal-distolingual (MB-B-DL), mesiobuccal-distolingual (MB-DL), mesiobuccal-midbuccal-distobuccal (MB-B-DB), mesiobuccal-distobuccal (MB-DB), and 84 sites using the random site selection method (RSSM) and (2) random-half-mouth (RHM) protocols.

Conclusions

The PRPs with the highest overall accuracy and precision in estimating the periodontitis prevalence, extent, severity, and risk associations included the full-mouth assessment at the following partial sites: MB-B-DL, MB-DL, MB-B-DB, MB-DB, and 84 sites using RSSM and RHM protocols.

BigMouth: development and maintenance of a successful dental data repository

Few clinical datasets exist in dentistry to conduct secondary research. Hence, a novel dental data repository called BigMouth was developed, which has grown to include 11 academic institutions contributing Electronic Health Record data on over 4.5 million patients. The primary purpose for BigMouth is to serve as a high-quality resource for rapidly conducting oral health-related research. BigMouth allows for assessing the oral health status of a diverse US patient population; provides rationale and evidence for new oral health care delivery modes; and embraces the specific oral health research education mission. A data governance framework that encouraged data sharing while controlling contributed data was initially developed. This transformed over time into a mature framework, including a fee schedule for data requests and allowing access to researchers from noncontributing institutions. Adoption of BigMouth helps to foster new collaborations between clinical, epidemiological, statistical, and informatics experts and provides an additional venue for professional development.

Periodontal disease prevalence, extent, and risk associations in untreated individuals

Objectives

to examine the prevalence, extent, and risk associations of untreated periodontitis.

Materials and Methods

A purposive sample of subjects who were never treated for periodontal conditions was clinically examined after collecting information about their sociodemographic characteristics, medical conditions, oral health behaviors, perceived stress, and perceived social support.

Results

A total of 431 subjects were recruited (response rate, 97.0%), and their mean age (SD) was 35.4 (13.3) years. Overall, high plaque levels were observed in all untreated individuals. The prevalence of periodontitis and severe (stage III/IV) periodontitis using the American Academy of Periodontology and European Federation of Periodontology (AAP/EFP) classification were 85.4% and 48.5%, respectively. The prevalence of moderate‐severe and severe periodontitis using the definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and AAP were 78.4% and 31.1%, respectively. The extent of periodontitis expressed as mean% of clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 3 mm and CAL ≥ 5 mm were 34.9% and 14.4%, respectively, while the mean% of a periodontal probing depth (PPD) ≥4 mm and PPD ≥6 mm were 22.0% and 9.2%, respectively. Risk determinants associated with AAP/EFP periodontitis after the adjustment for other variables were age ≥35 years (odds ratio [OR] = 11.5) and lower income (OR = 2.5). Adjusted risk associations with stage II/IV periodontitis included age ≥35 years (OR = 8.2), males (OR = 2.5), lower income (OR = 2.3), and lower perceived stress (OR = 2.0). Adjusted risk associations with CDC/AAP moderate‐severe periodontitis included age ≥35 years (OR = 12.0), lower income (OR = 2.1), and current cigarette smoking (OR = 4.2). Adjusted risk associations with CDC/AAP severe periodontitis included age ≥35 years (OR = 4.5), males (OR = 1.9), lower education (OR = 2.0), lower income (OR = 1.7), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.0), and current cigarette smoking (OR = 2.3).

Conclusions

The prevalence and extent of periodontitis were high in untreated subjects. Risk associations with untreated periodontitis included age ≥35 years, males, lower income, lower education, current cigarette smoking, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and lower perceived stress.

Accuracy and precision of using partial-mouth recordings to study the prevalence, extent and risk associations of untreated periodontitis

To study the accuracy and precision of estimating the prevalence, extent and associated risks of untreated periodontitis using partial-mouth recording protocols (PRPs) Methods: A purposive sample of 431 individuals who had never been treated for periodontal disease was recruited from screening clinics at the King Saud bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences. Data were collected using questionnaires and clinical examinations. The prevalence, extent and risk associations of periodontitis were evaluated. Three PRPs were compared to full-mouth recordings (FRPs) in terms of the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and absolute bias. Results: The prevalence of periodontitis was estimated with the highest accuracy and precision by examinations of the full mouth at the mesiobuccal and distolingual sites (FM)MB-DL, followed by random half-mouth (RHM) recordings. The extent of periodontitis was estimated with high precision using all the PRPs, and the absolute bias ranged from −0.6 to −2.3. The absolute bias indicated by OR for risk associations was small for the three PRPs and ranged from −0.8 to 0.8. Conclusion: (FM)MB-DL and RHM were the PRPs with moderate to high levels of accuracy and precision for estimating the prevalence and risk associations of periodontitis. The extent of periodontitis was estimated with high precision using all three PRPs. The results of this study showed that the magnitude and direction of bias were associated with the severity of periodontitis, the selected PRPs and the magnitude of the risk associations.

Long-term impact of powered toothbrush on oral health: 11-year cohort study

Aims

This study aimed to assess 11‐year longitudinal effects of powered toothbrush on periodontal health, caries and tooth loss in an adult population.

Materials and Methods

Participants of Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) cohort with dental examinations and interview data at SHIP‐1, SHIP‐2 or SHIP‐3 examinations were included. Mixed‐effects linear regression models were constructed between the exposure (manual versus powered toothbrush) and outcome variables (periodontal status using mean probing depth (PD) and mean clinical attachment loss (CAL), caries status using DMFS and DFS scores, and tooth loss), adjusting for potential baseline covariates.

Results

Final baseline (SHIP‐1) study sample comprised of 2,819 participants. Powered toothbrush users increased from 18.3% (SHIP‐1) to 36.9% (SHIP‐3); were younger; had significantly less mean PD [β: −0.09 (95% CI: −0.16; −0.02)] and mean CAL [β: −0.19 (95% CI: −0.32; −0.07)] progressions; and had 17.7% less DMFS progression and 19.5% more teeth retained than the manual toothbrushers.

Conclusions

In the long‐term, powered toothbrush seems to be effective in reducing mean PD and mean CAL progressions, besides increasing the number of teeth retained.