Flow cytometry as a strategy to study radiation-induced bystander effects in co-culture systems

Role of mTOR pathway in modulation of radiation induced bystander effects

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) is considered as an important consequence of radiation exposure. Based on the type of effect induced, it has important implications in radiation therapy. mTOR pathway, a key regulator of cell survival, plays an important role in radiation-induced damages. However, the role of mTOR signaling in the modulation of RIBE is still unclear. We evaluated the role of mTOR pathway in RIBE and its relationship with the radiation response of target cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Direct and bystander effects were evaluated by using clonogenic and MTT assay in five different cell lines. Expression of mTOR pathway proteins in directly targeted and bystander cells was studied using western blotting.

RESULTS

Among five different cell lines naïve HT1080 and A549 cells exhibited proliferative bystander effect induced by conditioned media and irradiated conditioned media, while no effect was observed in other cell lines. Everolimus significantly abolished the proliferative bystander effect induced in naïve cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the mTOR pathway plays an important role in RIBEs. These effects are cell type-specific and depending on the radiosensitivity of the target cells, therapeutic benefits of radiation may be modulated by treatment with mTOR inhibitors.

Role of epigenetic mechanisms in propagating off-targeted effects following radiation based therapies - A review

Despite being an important diagnostic and treatment modality, ionizing radiation (IR) is also known to cause genotoxicity and multiple side effects leading to secondary carcinogenesis. While modern cancer radiation therapy has improved patient recovery and enhanced survival rates, the risk of radiation-related adverse effects has become a growing challenge. It is now well-accepted that IR-induced side effects are not exclusively restricted to exposed cells but also spread to distant 'bystander' cells and even to the unexposed progeny of the irradiated cells. These 'off-targeted' effects involve a plethora of molecular events depending on the type of radiation and tumor tissue background. While the mechanisms by which off-targeted effects arise remain obscure, emerging evidence based on the non-mendelian inheritance of various manifestations of them as well as their persistence for longer periods supports a contribution of epigenetic factors. This review focuses on the major epigenetic phenomena including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and small RNA mediated silencing and their versatile role in the manifestation of IR induced off-targeted effects. As short- and long-range communication vehicles respectively, the role of gap junctions and exosomes in spreading these epigenetic-alteration driven off-targeted effects is also discussed. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the possible therapeutic potentials of these epigenetic mechanisms and how beneficial outcomes could potentially be achieved by targeting various signaling molecules involved in these mechanisms.

Intercellular communication of DNA damage and oxidative status underpin bystander effects

PURPOSE

A well-known phenomenon in the field of radiation biology is that cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (targeted cells) can induce in non-irradiated (non-targeted), bystander cells effects reminiscent of DNA damage responses (DDR) normally expected, exclusively in targeted cells. These phenomena are collectively referred to as radiation-induced bystander effects (RIBE) and have different manifestations depending on the endpoint studied. Although it is now recognized that RIBE reflects to a considerable extent communication by the targeted cells to undamaged cells of their damaged status, the molecular underpinnings of this communication and its significance for the organism are only partly understood. In particular, it remains unknown why and how targeted cells induce DNA damage in non-targeted, bystander cells threatening their genomic stability and risking thus their transformation to cancer cells. Here, we outline observations hinting to possible sources of artifacts in experiments designed to detect RIBE and summarize a model according to which targeted cells modulate their redox status as part of their overall response to IR and use this modified redox status as a source to generate signals that are transmitted to non-irradiated cells of the organism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A synthesis of published evidence is presented.

RESULTS

Depending on type, RIBE signals may be transmitted through various forms of direct intercellular contact, through molecules acting locally in a paracrine fashion, or through molecules acting remotely in an endocrine fashion. We reason that DNA damage generated in bystander cells is unlikely to manifest the clustered character exhibited in directly exposed cells and postulate that RIBE will depend on complications generated when simpler forms of damage encounter the DNA replication fork.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that RIBE result from intercellular communication mechanisms designed to spread within tissues, or the organism, alarm signals of DNA damage inflicted in subsets of the constituent cells. This response likely evolved to protect organisms by appropriately modulating stress response, repair or apoptosis, and may in some instances also cause adverse effects, e.g. as collateral damage.

Bystander signaling via oxidative metabolism

The radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) is the initiation of biological end points in cells (bystander cells) that are not directly traversed by an incident-radiation track, but are in close proximity to cells that are receiving the radiation. RIBE has been indicted of causing DNA damage via oxidative stress, besides causing direct damage, inducing tumorigenesis, producing micronuclei, and causing apoptosis. RIBE is regulated by signaling proteins that are either endogenous or secreted by cells as a means of communication between cells, and can activate intracellular or intercellular oxidative metabolism that can further trigger signaling pathways of inflammation. Bystander signals can pass through gap junctions in attached cell lines, while the suspended cell lines transmit these signals via hormones and soluble proteins. This review provides the background information on how reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as bystander signals. Although ROS have a very short half-life and have a nanometer-scale sphere of influence, the wide variety of ROS produced via various sources can exert a cumulative effect, not only in forming DNA adducts but also setting up signaling pathways of inflammation, apoptosis, cell-cycle arrest, aging, and even tumorigenesis. This review outlines the sources of the bystander effect linked to ROS in a cell, and provides methods of investigation for researchers who would like to pursue this field of science.

High doses of ionizing radiation on bone repair: is there effect outside the irradiated site?

Local ionizing radiation causes damage to bone metabolism, it reduces blood supply and cellularity over time. Recent studies indicate that radiation promotes biological response outside the treatment field. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ionizing radiation on bone repair outside the irradiated field. Ten healthy male Wistar rats were used; and five animals were submitted to radiotherapy on the left femur. After 4 weeks, in all animals were created bone defects in the right and left femurs. Seven days after surgery, animals were euthanized. The femurs were removed and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=5): Control (C) (right femur of the non-irradiated animals); Local ionizing radiation (IR) (left femur of the irradiated animals); Contralateral ionizing radiation (CIR) (right femur of the irradiated animals). The femurs were processed and embedded in paraffin; and bone histologic sections were evaluated to quantify the bone neoformation. Histomorphometric analysis showed that there was no significant difference between groups C (24.6±7.04) and CIR (25.3±4.31); and IR group not showed bone neoformation. The results suggest that ionizing radiation affects bone repair, but does not interfere in bone repair distant from the primary irradiated site.

Low Concentration of Exogenous Carbon Monoxide Modulates Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect in Mammalian Cell Cluster Model

During radiotherapy procedures, radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) can potentially lead to genetic hazards to normal tissues surrounding the targeted regions. Previous studies showed that RIBE intensities in cell cluster models were much higher than those in monolayer cultured cell models. On the other hand, low-concentration carbon monoxide (CO) was previously shown to exert biological functions via binding to the heme domain of proteins and then modulating various signaling pathways. In relation, our previous studies showed that exogenous CO generated by the CO releasing molecule, tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (CORM-2), at a relatively low concentration (20 µM), effectively attenuated the formation of RIBE-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and micronucleus (MN). In the present work, we further investigated the capability of a low concentration of exogenous CO (CORM-2) of attenuating or inhibiting RIBE in a mixed-cell cluster model. Our results showed that CO (CORM-2) with a low concentration of 30 µM could effectively suppress RIBE-induced DSB (p53 binding protein 1, p53BP1), MN formation and cell proliferation in bystander cells but not irradiated cells via modulating the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) andcyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The results can help mitigate RIBE-induced hazards during radiotherapy procedures.

Role of nitric oxide in the radiation-induced bystander effect

Cells that are not irradiated but are affected by “stress signal factors” released from irradiated cells are called bystander cells. These cells, as well as directly irradiated ones, express DNA damage-related proteins and display excess DNA damage, chromosome aberrations, mutations, and malignant transformation. This phenomenon has been studied widely in the past 20 years, since its first description by Nagasawa and Little in 1992, and is known as the radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE). Several factors have been identified as playing a role in the bystander response. This review will focus on one of them, nitric oxide (NO), and its role in the stimulation and propagation of RIBE. The hydrophobic properties of NO, which permit its diffusion through the cytoplasm and plasma membranes, allow this signaling molecule to easily spread from irradiated cells to bystander cells without the involvement of gap junction intercellular communication. NO produced in irradiated tissues mediates cellular regulation through posttranslational modification of a number of regulatory proteins. The best studied of these modifications are S-nitrosylation (reversible oxidation of cysteine) and tyrosine nitration. These modifications can up- or down-regulate the functions of many proteins modulating different NO-dependent effects. These NO-dependent effects include the stimulation of genomic instability (GI) and the accumulation of DNA errors in bystander cells without direct DNA damage.

•

Ionizing radiation stimulates generation of nitric oxide (NO).

•

NO stimulates genomic instability by inhibiting BRCA1 protein expression.

•

NO can diffuse and stimulate genomic instability in the bystander cells.

•

Propagation of NO from cell-to-cell creates a “mutator fields”.

•

Definition of the “mutator filed” is proposed.

Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses

Elucidating the biological effect of low linear energy transfer (LET), low-dose and/or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation is essential in ensuring radiation safety. Over the past two decades, non-targeted effects, which are not only a direct consequence of radiation-induced initial lesions produced in cellular DNA but also of intra- and inter-cellular communications involving both targeted and non-targeted cells, have been reported and are currently defining a new paradigm in radiation biology. These effects include radiation-induced adaptive response, low-dose hypersensitivity, genomic instability, and radiation-induced bystander response (RIBR). RIBR is generally defined as a cellular response that is induced in non-irradiated cells that receive bystander signals from directly irradiated cells. RIBR could thus play an important biological role in low-dose irradiation conditions. However, this suggestion was mainly based on findings obtained using high-LET charged-particle radiations. The human population (especially the Japanese, who are exposed to lower doses of radon than the world average) is more frequently exposed to low-LET photons (X-rays or γ-rays) than to high-LET charged-particle radiation on a daily basis. There are currently a growing number of reports describing a distinguishing feature between photon-induced bystander response and high-LET RIBR. In particular, photon-induced bystander response is strongly influenced by irradiation dose, the irradiated region of the targeted cells, and p53 status. The present review focuses on the photon-induced bystander response, and discusses its impact on the low-dose radiation effect.

The biological effect of large single doses: a possible role for non-targeted effects in cell inactivation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Novel radiotherapy techniques increasingly use very large dose fractions. It has been argued that the biological effect of large dose fractions may differ from that of conventional fraction sizes. The purpose was to study the biological effect of large single doses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clonogenic cell survival of MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was determined after direct X-ray irradiation, irradiation of feeder cells, or transfer of conditioned medium (CM). Cell-cycle distributions and the apoptotic sub-G1 fraction were measured by flow cytometry. Cytokines in CM were quantified by a cytokine antibody array. γH2AX foci were detected by immunofluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

The surviving fraction of MCF7 cells irradiated in vitro with 12 Gy showed an 8.5-fold decrease (95% c.i.: 4.4-16.3; P<0.0001) when the density of irradiated cells was increased from 10 to 50×10(3) cells per flask. Part of this effect was due to a dose-dependent transferrable factor as shown in CM experiments in the dose range 5-15 Gy. While no effect on apoptosis and cell cycle distribution was observed, and no differentially expressed cytokine could be identified, the transferable factor induced prolonged expression of γH2AX DNA repair foci at 1-12 h.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose-dependent non-targeted effect on clonogenic cell survival was found in the dose range 5-15 Gy. The dependence of SF on cell numbers at high doses would represent a "cohort effect" in vivo. These results support the hypothesis that non-targeted effects may contribute to the efficacy of very large dose fractions in radiotherapy.

Bystander effects as manifestation of intercellular communication of DNA damage and of the cellular oxidative status

It is becoming increasingly clear that cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) and other genotoxic agents (targeted cells) can communicate their DNA damage response (DDR) status to cells that have not been directly irradiated (bystander cells). The term radiation-induced bystander effects (RIBE) describes facets of this phenomenon, but its molecular underpinnings are incompletely characterized. Consequences of DDR in bystander cells have been extensively studied and include transformation and mutation induction; micronuclei, chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange formation; as well as modulations in gene expression, proliferation and differentiation patterns. A fundamental question arising from such observations is why targeted cells induce DNA damage in non-targeted, bystander cells threatening thus their genomic stability and risking the induction of cancer. Here, we review and synthesize available literature to gather support for a model according to which targeted cells modulate as part of DDR their redox status and use it as a source to generate signals for neighboring cells. Such signals can be either small molecules transported to adjacent non-targeted cells via gap-junction intercellular communication (GJIC), or secreted factors that can reach remote, non-targeted cells by diffusion or through the circulation. We review evidence that such signals can induce in the recipient cell modulations of redox status similar to those seen in the originating targeted cell - occasionally though self-amplifying feedback loops. The resulting increase of oxidative stress in bystander cells induces, often in conjunction with DNA replication, the observed DDR-like responses that are at times strong enough to cause apoptosis. We reason that RIBE reflect the function of intercellular communication mechanisms designed to spread within tissues, or the entire organism, information about DNA damage inflicted to individual, constituent cells. Such responses are thought to protect the organism by enhancing repair in a community of cells and by eliminating severely damaged cells.

Flow cytometry-based quantification of cell proliferation in the mixed cell co-culture

In cell communities, among the crucial signals that govern cell function are those generated locally by surrounding cells. A co-culture of mixed homotypic or heterotypic cells, which is often used in various fields of experimental biology and medicine, can be applied for elucidation of the role of cell proximity in modulating proliferative responses. Quick and reliable quantification of the changes in proliferation of each of the mixed cell populations as a result of their co-culture is of importance. For this purpose, flow cytometry together with fluorescent tracers that do not affect cell proliferation can be used.

Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity

Direct cellular DNA damage may lead to genome destabilization in unexposed, bystander, cells sharing the same milieu with directly damaged cells by means of the bystander effect. One proposed mechanism involves double strand break (DSB) formation in S phase cells at sites of single strand lesions in the DNA of replication complexes, which has a more open structure compared with neighboring DNA. The DNA in transcription complexes also has a more open structure, and hence may be susceptible to bystander DSB formation from single strand lesions. To examine whether transcription predisposes non-replicating cells to bystander effect-induced DNA DSBs, we examined two types of primary cells that exhibit high levels of transcription in the absence of replication, rat neurons and human lymphocytes. We found that non-replicating bystander cells with high transcription rates exhibited substantial levels of DNA DSBs, as monitored by γ-H2AX foci formation. Additionally, as reported in proliferating cells, TGF-β and NO were found to mimic bystander effects in cell populations lacking DNA synthesis. These results indicate that cell vulnerability to bystander DSB damage may result from transcription as well as replication. The findings offer insights into which tissues may be vulnerable to bystander genomic destabilization in vivo.

Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures?

The term radiation-induced bystander effect is used to describe radiation-induced biological changes that manifest in unirradiated cells remaining within an irradiated cell population. Despite their failure to fit into the framework of classical radiobiology, radiation-induced bystander effects have entered the mainstream and have become established in the radiobiology vocabulary as a bona fide radiation response. However, there is still no consensus on a precise definition of radiation-induced bystander effects, which currently encompasses a number of distinct signal-mediated effects. These effects are classified here into three classes: bystander effects, abscopal effects and cohort effects. In this review, the data have been evaluated to define, where possible, various features specific to radiation-induced bystander effects, including their timing, range, potency and dependence on dose, dose rate, radiation quality and cell type. The weight of evidence supporting these defining features is discussed in the context of bystander experimental systems that closely replicate realistic human exposure scenarios. Whether the manifestation of bystander effects in vivo is intrinsically limited to particular radiation exposure scenarios is considered. The conditions under which radiation-induced bystander effects are induced in vivo will ultimately determine their impact on radiation-induced carcinogenic risk.

Nitric oxide mediated DNA double strand breaks induced in proliferating bystander cells after alpha-particle irradiation

Low-dose alpha-particle exposures comprise 55% of the environmental dose to the human population and have been shown to induce bystander responses. Previous studies showed that bystander effect could induce stimulated cell growth or genotoxicity, such as excessive DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), micronuclei (MN), mutation and decreased cell viability, in the bystander cell population. In the present study, the stimulated cell growth, detected with flow cytometry (FCM), and the increased MN and DSB, detected with p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) immunofluorescence, were observed simultaneously in the bystander cell population, which were co-cultured with cells irradiated by low-dose alpha-particles (1-10 cGy) in a mixed system. Further studies indicated that nitric oxide (NO) and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) played very important roles in mediating cell proliferation and inducing MN and DSB in the bystander population through treatments with NO scavenger and TGF-beta1 antibody. Low-concentrations of NO, generated by spermidine, were proved to induce cell proliferation, DSB and MN simultaneously. The proliferation or shortened cell cycle in bystander cells gave them insufficient time to repair DSBs. The increased cell division might increase the probability of carcinogenesis in bystander cells since cell proliferation increased the probability of mutation from the mis-repaired or un-repaired DSBs.

Exogenous carbon monoxide protects the bystander Chinese hamster ovary cells in mixed coculture system after alpha-particle irradiation

In the present work, the inhibitory effect of carbon monoxide (CO), generated by tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer [CO-releasing molecule (CORM-2)], on the toxicity of radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) after alpha-particle irradiation was studied in a mixed coculture system. CO (CORM-2) treatment showed a significant inhibitory effect to the formation of p53 binding protein 1 (BP1) and micronuclei (MN) induced by RIBE in a concentration-dependent manner, but in the directly irradiated cell population no distinct decreases of BP1 and MN formation were observed. In this mixed coculture system, nitric oxide (NO) or superoxide anion (O2(*-)) was also proved to mediate the transduction of RIBE by using a NO synthase inhibitor or NADPH-oxidase-specific inhibitor treatment. The elevated O2(*-) was attenuated by CO (CORM-2) treatment in the bystander cells as measured by hydroethidine staining and fluorescence assessment. The exogenous NO (sper) or O2(*-) (H2O2) was used to mimic NO/O(2)-mediated RIBE, and CO (CORM-2) treatment also showed a protective effect to cells against the toxicity of these exogenous factors. Considering the inhibitory effect of CO on RIBE and the wide use of CO in therapy of diseases, it is hoped that a low concentration of CO can protect normal tissues against RIBE during radiotherapy.

Concomitant quantification of targeted drug delivery and biological response in individual cells

Targeted therapies result in heterogeneous drug delivery, often with highly variable drug uptake in the targeted cells and significant numbers of cells that are essentially untargeted. However both the variably targeted cells and neighboring bystander cells may respond to the treatment. Using ionizing radiation as an example of a targeted therapeutic agent, we describe a quantitative immunofluorescence-based approach for concomitant quantification of exposure and measurement of biological responses in both targeted and bystander cells. Cultures of human skin fibroblasts are co-pulse-labeled with 3H-deoxycytidine (3H-dC) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). The labeled cells, identified by BrdU immunofluorescence, are internally irradiated by low-energy beta-particles emitted by incorporated 3H-dC. BrdU immunofluorescence intensity is proportional to radioactivity incorporated and, therefore, to radiation dose rate. Cell-cycle arrest in G2 is measured in labeled cells as function of dose rate. Stress responses in bystander cells, indicated by a G1 checkpoint, are concomitantly measured with a flow cytometric-cumulative labeling index (FCM-CLI) assay. The overall approach presented herein may be useful in the context of evaluating responses to targeted drug delivery.

Proteome analysis of proliferative response of bystander cells adjacent to cells exposed to ionizing radiation

Recently (Cytometry 2003, 56A, 71-80), we reported that direct cell-to-cell contact is required for stimulating proliferation of bystander rat liver cells (WB-F344) cocultured with irradiated cells, and neither functional gap junction intercellular communication nor long-range extracellular factors appear to be involved in this proliferative bystander response (PBR). The molecular basis for this response is unknown. Confluent monolayers of WB-F344 cells were exposed to 5-Gray (Gy) of gamma-rays. Irradiated cells were mixed with unirradiated cells and co-cultured for 24 h. Cells were harvested and protein expression was examined using 2-DE. Protein expression was also determined in cultures of unirradiated and 5-Gy irradiated cells. Proteins were identified by MS. Nucleophosmin (NPM)-1, a multifunctional nucleolar protein, was more highly expressed in bystander cells than in either unirradiated or 5-Gy irradiated cells. Enolase-alpha, a glycolytic enzyme, was present in acidic and basic variants in unirradiated cells. In bystander and 5-Gy irradiated cells, the basic variant was weakly expressed, whereas the acidic variant was overwhelmingly present. These data indicate that the presence of irradiated cells can affect NPM-1 and enolase-alpha in adjacent bystander cells. These proteins appear to participate in molecular events related to the PBR and suggest that this response may involve cellular defense, proliferation, and metabolism.

Radiation-induced bystander effects in malignant trophoblast cells are independent from gap junctional communication

It is controversially discussed that irradiation induces bystander effects via gap junction channels and/or diffusible cellular factors such as nitric oxide or cytokines excreted from the cells into the environment. But up to now the molecular mechanism leading to a bystander response is not well understood. To discriminate between both mechanisms of bystander response, (i) mediated by gap junctional communication and/or (ii) mediated by diffusible molecules, we used non-communicating Jeg3 malignant trophoblast cells transfected with inducible gap junction proteins, connexin43 and connexin26, respectively, based on the Tet-On system. We co-cultivated X-ray irradiated and non-irradiated bystander Jeg3 cells for 4 h, separated both cell populations by flow cytometry and evaluated the expression of activated p53 by Western blot analysis. The experimental design was proven with communicating versus non-communicating Jeg3 cells. Interestingly, our results revealed a bystander effect which was independent from gap junctional communication properties and the connexin isoform expressed. Therefore, it seems more likely that the bystander effect is not mediated via gap junction channels but rather by paracrine mechanisms via excreted molecules in Jeg3 cells.

Radiation-induced bystander effects and adaptive response in murine lymphocytes

PURPOSE

To study the bystander effects of gamma-radiation in murine lymphocytes using irradiated conditioned medium (ICM) generated from irradiated lymphocytes.

METHODS

Proliferation response of unirradiated lymphocytes to mitogen concanavalin A (con A) in presence of ICM, collected from gamma-irradiated lymphocytes (60Co source; 0.35 Gy/min; 0.1-1 Gy), was studied by 3H-thymidine incorporation and also by dye dilution using carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Expression of proliferation markers, interleukin 2 receptor alpha chain (CD25) and cyclin D in ICM treated lymphocytes was analyzed by labeling with specific antibodies. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis were estimated by flow cytometry using dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) and propidium iodide, respectively. Nitric oxide (NO) was measured using Griess reagent.

RESULTS

Proliferation response to con A in unirradiated lymphocytes was enhanced in the presence of ICM with maximum enhancement observed in the presence of 0.5 Gy ICM. Augmentation of proliferation in the presence of ICM was accompanied by an increase in CD25 and cyclin D expression, enhanced ROS and NO generation. ICM pretreated lymphocytes showed adaptive response to radiation which was not abrogated by wortmannin, a phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Soluble factors released from irradiated lymphocytes initiate a signaling cascade in unirradiated lymphocytes resulting in increased response to mitogen and radioresistance which may have an important role in radiation-induced immunomodulation.

Bystander cell proliferation is modulated by the number of adjacent cells that were exposed to ionizing radiation

BACKGROUND

Direct cell-to-cell contact appears to be a prerequisite for the proliferative response of bystander WB-F344 cells co-cultured with irradiated cells; however, neither gap junctional intercellular communication nor long-range factors released into the medium appear to be involved (Cytometry 2003;56A:71-80). The present work investigated whether the proliferative bystander response depends on the number of irradiated cells (cells exposed to external gamma-rays or cells exposed to short-range beta-particles emitted by DNA-incorporated (3)H-thymidine) that are adjacent to unirradiated bystander cells.

METHODS

Subconfluent monolayers of rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344) were incubated in the presence of (methyl-(3)H)thymidine at a concentration of 5.8 kBq/ml for 18 h. Radiolabeled cells containing 0.7 x 10(-3) Bq/cell (absorbed dose: 0.14 Gy) were plated together with unlabeled cells in proportions of 6% and 94%, 12% and 88%, 25% and 75%, 50% and 50%, and 75% and 25%, respectively, keeping constant the total number of plated cells. In a parallel experiment, cells acutely exposed to 5 Gy of (137)Cs gamma-rays were plated with unirradiated cells in the same proportions. In both experiments, cells were co-cultured for 24 h followed by a flow cytometric study of their proliferation. The two cell populations in the co-cultures were distinguished by staining one population with carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester, which metabolizes intracellularly.

RESULTS

Increasing the fraction of irradiated cells relative to unirradiated bystander cells led to an increase in proliferation of bystander cells. Specifically, in co-cultures in which irradiated cells were initially mixed with unirradiated cells in proportions of 50% and 50% and of 75% and 25%, respectively, bystander cells showed a statistically significant increase of their proliferation compared with the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The proliferative response of WB-F344 bystander cells is modulated by the number of adjacent cells that are exposed to ionizing radiation from external gamma-rays or intracellularly emitted (3)H beta-particles.

Characterization of cell-cycle progression and growth of WB-F344 normal rat liver epithelial cells following gamma-ray exposure

BACKGROUND

Apparently normal rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344) have been widely used in studies pertaining to carcinogenesis. Ionizing radiation, a well known carcinogen, is known to perturb cell-cycle progression in a dose-dependent manner, thereby causing delay in cell proliferation. However, for WB-F344 cells, there is a paucity of such data, which are of substantial importance in understanding their radiation response. Here, the distribution of phases in the cell-cycle and the proliferation ability of WB-F344 cells are characterized at various time points after the cells have been irradiated with different doses of gamma-rays.

METHODS

After WB-F344 cells reached 100% confluence, they were trypsinized and suspended at 3.5 x 10(5) cells/ml in culture medium. Cells were irradiated in suspension with (137)Cs gamma-rays at doses from 1-10 Gy. After irradiation, 1 x 10(5) cells were plated into 60 x 15-mm culture dishes and incubated at 37 degrees C, with 2% CO(2) and 98% air. At 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h postirradiation, cells were harvested, counted, and subjected to flow cytometric cell-cycle analysis.

RESULTS

Growth curves of WB-F344 cells irradiated with gamma-rays started to separate at 36 h postirradiation. By 60 h postirradiation, the growth curves for each of the 10 absorbed doses were distinctly separated. Drastic redistributions of control and irradiated cells within G(0)/G(1)-, S-, and G(2)/M-phases of the cell cycle were observed during the first 36 h of cell growth. At each time point postirradiation, cell-cycle phase profiles of irradiated cells were altered in a dose-dependent manner. In general, there was a strong correlation between the percentage of G(2)/M-phase cells and absorbed dose, with the exception of 24 h postirradiation. The percentage of G(2)/M-phase cells increased as a function of time postirradiation, suggestive of delays in the passage of cells through the G(2) cell-cycle checkpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

This work provides a general description of cell cycle redistribution and repopulation kinetics of WB-F344 cells at various times postirradiation of quiescent cells that were subsequently allowed to proliferate. In general, growth inhibition and delays in progression through G(2)/M-phase correlated well with radiation dose. These data should be of considerable significance in the design of experiments that examine the radiation response of these cells.

The radiation-induced bystander effect: evidence and significance

A multitude of biological effects observed over the past two decades in various in vivo and in vitro cell culture experiments have indicated that low dose/low fluence ionizing radiation has significantly different biological responses than high dose radiation. Exposure of cell populations to very low fluences of alpha-particles or incorporated radionuclides results in significant biological effects occurring in both the irradiated and nonirradiated cells in the population. Cells recipient of growth medium from irradiated cultures can also respond to the radiation exposure. This phenomenon, termed the 'bystander response', has been postulated to impact both the estimation of risks of exposure to ionizing radiation and radiotherapy. Amplification of radiation-induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects by the bystander effect is in contrast to the observations of adaptive responses, which are generally induced following exposure to low dose, low linear energy transfer radiation and which tend to attenuate radiation-induced damage. In this article, the evidence for existence of radiation-induced bystander effects and our current knowledge of the biochemical and molecular events involved in mediating these effects are described. Potential similarities between factors that mediate the radiation-induced bystander and adaptive responses are highlighted.

Proliferative response of bystander cells adjacent to cells with incorporated radioactivity

BACKGROUND

In a recent study, we showed that cells irradiated with gamma-rays stimulate cell growth of unirradiated (bystander) cells, when the two populations are co-cultured as a mixture. Direct cell-to-cell contact appears to be a prerequisite for the proliferative response of the bystander cells. The aim of the current work is to investigate the possible proliferative bystander effects caused by intracellular irradiation with incorporated radionuclides, specifically the short-range beta particle emitter, tritium ((3)H).

METHODS

Subconfluent monolayers of rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344) were incubated in the presence of (methyl-(3)H)thymidine ((3)HTdR) at concentrations ranging between 5.2 kBq/ml and 57.8 kBq/ml for 18 h. Radiolabeled cells, containing between 0.7 x 10(-3) Bq/cell and 8.8 x 10(-3) Bq/cell were mixed with unlabeled (i.e., bystander) cells in a ratio of 1:1 and cultured together for 24 h followed by an flow cytometry (FCM) study of their proliferation. In order to discriminate the two populations of co-cultured cells, one cell population (unlabeled bystander cells) was stained with carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester (CFDA SE), which metabolizes intracellularly. The absorbed doses received by the radiolabeled cells that contained 0.7 x 10(-3), 2.5 x 10(-3), and 8.8 x 10(-3) Bq/cell were 0.14, 0.49, and 1.7 Gy, respectively.

RESULTS

Cells that were not treated with tritiated thymidine (unlabeled cells), in the presence of radiolabeled cells that received absorbed doses from 0.14-1.7 Gy, showed enhanced cell growth by approximately 9 to 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cells labeled with (3)HTdR can induce increased proliferation in neighboring unlabeled bystander cells. FCM provides an excellent basis for characterization of proliferative bystander effects in co-culture systems.

Cell proximity is a prerequisite for the proliferative response of bystander cells co-cultured with cells irradiated with ?-rays

BACKGROUND

In a recent study, we showed that unirradiated cells, when they are in the presence of cells irradiated with gamma-rays, are characterized by enhanced cell growth (Cytometry 2003;54A:1-7). However, the mechanisms and factors involved in the proliferative response of bystander cells are largely unknown. The aim of the current work was to investigate the possible role of spatial proximity of cells, including gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), in transmitting proliferation signals from cells irradiated with gamma-rays to unirradiated cells (bystander cells).

METHODS

Confluent monolayers of rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344) were irradiated with 137Cs gamma-rays at doses ranging between 0.5 and 10 Gy. The impact of cell proximity on the proliferative response of bystander cells was determined by co-culturing different densities of irradiated and unirradiated cells (ratio 1:1) followed 24 h later by two-scheme flow cytometric analysis of their proliferation. To determine whether soluble extracellular factors play a role in this response, irradiated cells were plated together with unirradiated cells at the same ratio (1:1), but they were not allowed to directly contact unirradiated cells by using porous low-protein binding polyethylene terephthalate membranes. After 24 h, the numbers of unirradiated cells in the co-culture with irradiated cells were compared with the numbers of unirradiated cells in the control (unirradiated cells co-cultured with unirradiated cells). To investigate the possible involvement of GJIC in mediating the proliferative response in the bystander cells, the proliferation status of unirradiated GJIC-incompetent WB-aB1 cells was compared with that of unirradiated WB-F344 cells that were GJIC competent. In all of the protocols, the two populations of co-cultured cells were distinguished by labeling one population with fluorescent cell tracers, such as membrane-resident or CFDA SE (carboxy) fluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester that metabolizes intracellularly.

RESULTS

Unirradiated cells that were co-cultured with irradiated cells, but were not allowed to directly contact them, did not show any changes in the proliferation rate compared with that of unirradiated cells in the control. Unirradiated cells that were co-cultured as a mixture with irradiated cells showed enhanced and statistically significant proliferation, particularly when they were plated together more densely. The proliferation rate of bystander WB-aB1 cells was apparently higher than that of bystander WB-F344 cells; however, the difference was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present experimental model, the spatial proximity of cells is a crucial element for transmitting growth stimulation signals from irradiated cells to neighboring unirradiated cells. Direct cell-to-cell contact appears to be required for transmitting these signals. Neither functional GJIC nor soluble extracellular factors released by irradiated cells into the culture medium appear to play significant roles in this process under the present experimental conditions.