|
1
|
Bishop KW, Erion Barner LA, Han Q, Baraznenok E, Lan L, Poudel C, Gao G, Serafin RB, Chow SSL, Glaser AK, Janowczyk A, Brenes D, Huang H, Miyasato D, True LD, Kang S, Vaughan JC, Liu JTC. An end-to-end workflow for nondestructive 3D pathology. Nat Protoc 2024; 19:1122-1148. [PMID: 38263522 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-023-00934-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in 3D pathology offer the ability to image orders of magnitude more tissue than conventional pathology methods while also providing a volumetric context that is not achievable with 2D tissue sections, and all without requiring destructive tissue sectioning. Generating high-quality 3D pathology datasets on a consistent basis, however, is not trivial and requires careful attention to a series of details during tissue preparation, imaging and initial data processing, as well as iterative optimization of the entire process. Here, we provide an end-to-end procedure covering all aspects of a 3D pathology workflow (using light-sheet microscopy as an illustrative imaging platform) with sufficient detail to perform well-controlled preclinical and clinical studies. Although 3D pathology is compatible with diverse staining protocols and computationally generated color palettes for visual analysis, this protocol focuses on the use of a fluorescent analog of hematoxylin and eosin, which remains the most common stain used for gold-standard pathological reports. We present our guidelines for a broad range of end users (e.g., biologists, clinical researchers and engineers) in a simple format. The end-to-end workflow requires 3-6 d to complete, bearing in mind that data analysis may take longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin W Bishop
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Qinghua Han
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elena Baraznenok
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lydia Lan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chetan Poudel
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gan Gao
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert B Serafin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah S L Chow
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Adam K Glaser
- Allen Institute for Neural Dynamics, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew Janowczyk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Oncology, Division of Precision Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostics, Division of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Brenes
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hongyi Huang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dominie Miyasato
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lawrence D True
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Soyoung Kang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joshua C Vaughan
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan T C Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Bishop KW, Barner LAE, Han Q, Baraznenok E, Lan L, Poudel C, Gao G, Serafin RB, Chow SS, Glaser AK, Janowczyk A, Brenes D, Huang H, Miyasato D, True LD, Kang S, Vaughan JC, Liu JT. An end-to-end workflow for non-destructive 3D pathology. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.03.551845. [PMID: 37577615 PMCID: PMC10418226 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.551845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in 3D pathology offer the ability to image orders-of-magnitude more tissue than conventional pathology while providing a volumetric context that is lacking with 2D tissue sections, all without requiring destructive tissue sectioning. Generating high-quality 3D pathology datasets on a consistent basis is non-trivial, requiring careful attention to many details regarding tissue preparation, imaging, and data/image processing in an iterative process. Here we provide an end-to-end protocol covering all aspects of a 3D pathology workflow (using light-sheet microscopy as an illustrative imaging platform) with sufficient detail to perform well-controlled preclinical and clinical studies. While 3D pathology is compatible with diverse staining protocols and computationally generated color palettes for visual analysis, this protocol will focus on a fluorescent analog of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), which remains the most common stain for gold-standard diagnostic determinations. We present our guidelines for a broad range of end-users (e.g., biologists, clinical researchers, and engineers) in a simple tutorial format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin W. Bishop
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Qinghua Han
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elena Baraznenok
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lydia Lan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Chetan Poudel
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gan Gao
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert B. Serafin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sarah S.L. Chow
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Adam K. Glaser
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew Janowczyk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Oncology, Division of Precision Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Division of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Brenes
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hongyi Huang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Dominie Miyasato
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Soyoung Kang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joshua C. Vaughan
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jonathan T.C. Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Ploeger LS, Dullens HFJ, Huisman A, van Diest PJ. Fluorescent stains for quantification of DNA by confocal laser scanning microscopy in 3-D. Biotech Histochem 2008; 83:63-9. [PMID: 18568680 DOI: 10.1080/10520290802127586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Confocal microscopy requires the use of fluorophores to visualize structures of interest within a specimen. To perform reliable measurements of the intensity of fluorescence, the stain should be specific, penetrate well into tissue sections, and bind stoichiometrically. Furthermore, emission must be linear with respect to DNA content and brightness, and fluorescence should be stable. Confocal microscopy is used to determine DNA ploidy and to analyze texture of nuclei, which is accomplished in three dimensions, because nuclei can be measured within the original tissue context. For this purpose the sample must be stained with a DNA binding fluorophore with the properties described above. Stains with different properties have been developed for different applications. We review here the advantages and disadvantages of these different stains for analyzing DNA ploidy and nuclear texture using three-dimensional microscopy. We conclude that SYBR green I and TO-PRO-3 are the most suitable stains for this purpose at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Ploeger
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|