1
|
Rhodes JM. MRD-directed therapy in CLL: ready for prime time? HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2023; 2023:413-420. [PMID: 38066928 PMCID: PMC10727082 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has moved away from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) toward the use of novel targeted agents. Commercially available drugs, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, often used in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, are now the mainstay of therapy both in the frontline and in relapsed settings. As the landscape for CLL management evolves, therapeutic endpoints need to be redefined. Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive tool to identify disease burden following treatment with several therapeutic regimens in CLL (including CIT, venetoclax-based regimens, and cellular therapies), and it has demonstrated prognostic value. Despite recent advances, the utility of MRD-directed therapy and attempts to eradicate it in routine clinical practice remain debated. There is little comparative data from clinical trials on the best assay to determine undetectable MRD (U-MRD) and whether its monitoring can lead to changes in treatment strategies. Our review discusses the definitions of MRD, assays for its detection, and its impact on long-term survival outcomes for patients with a CLL diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna M. Rhodes
- Division of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fisher A, Goradia H, Martinez-Calle N, Patten PEM, Munir T. The evolving use of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1130617. [PMID: 36910619 PMCID: PMC9992794 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), assessed on and after treatment, correlates with increased progression-free and overall survival benefit. More recently, MRD assessment has been included in large clinical trials as a primary outcome and is increasingly used in routine practice as a prognostic tool, a therapeutic goal, and potentially a trigger for early intervention. Modern therapy for CLL delivers prolonged remissions, causing readout of traditional trial outcomes such as progression-free and overall survival to be inherently delayed. This represents a barrier for the rapid incorporation of novel drugs to the overall therapeutic armamentarium. MRD offers a dynamic and robust platform for the assessment of treatment efficacy in CLL, complementing traditional outcome measures and accelerating access to novel drugs. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of recent major clinical trials of CLL therapy, focusing on small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibody combinations that have recently emerged as the standard frontline and relapse treatment options. We explore the assessment and reporting of MRD (including novel techniques) and the challenges of standardization and provide a comprehensive review of the relevance and adequacy of MRD as a clinical trial endpoint. We further discuss the impact that MRD data have on clinical decision-making and how it can influence a patient's experience. Finally, we evaluate how upcoming trial design and clinical practice are evolving in the face of MRD-driven outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Fisher
- Division of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - H. Goradia
- Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - N. Martinez-Calle
- Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - PEM. Patten
- Department of Haematology, Kings College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T. Munir
- Department of Haematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D'Arena G, Sgambato A, Volpe S, Coppola G, Amodeo R, Tirino V, D'Auria F, Statuto T, Valvano L, Pietrantuono G, Deaglio S, Efremov D, Laurenti L, Aiello A. Flow cytometric evaluation of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Where do we stand? Hematol Oncol 2022; 40:835-842. [PMID: 35667043 DOI: 10.1002/hon.3037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a relevant parameter of response to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several methods have been developed, flow cytometry has emerged as the most useful and standardized approach to measure and quantify MRD. The improved sensitivity of MRD measurements has been paralleled by the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for CLL, increasing the applicability of MRD detection in this setting. Chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy have firstly demonstrated their ability to obtain a deep MRD. Combined targeted therapies are also demonstrating a high molecular response rate and prospective trials are exploring the role of MRD to guide the duration of treatment in this setting. In this review we briefly summarize what we have learned about MRD with emphasis on its flow cytometric detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni D'Arena
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sgambato
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Silvestro Volpe
- Immunohematology Unit, AORN Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Coppola
- Immunohematology Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Rachele Amodeo
- Flow Cytometry Unit, Clinical Laboratory, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Virginia Tirino
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Fiorella D'Auria
- Laboratory of Clinical and Advanced Diagnostics, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Teodora Statuto
- Laboratory of Clinical and Advanced Diagnostics, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Luciana Valvano
- Laboratory of Clinical and Advanced Diagnostics, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pietrantuono
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Silvia Deaglio
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Dimitar Efremov
- Molecular Hematology, International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Luca Laurenti
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University of "Sacred Heart", Roma, Italy
| | - Antonella Aiello
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wierda WG, Rawstron A, Cymbalista F, Badoux X, Rossi D, Brown JR, Egle A, Abello V, Cervera Ceballos E, Herishanu Y, Mulligan SP, Niemann CU, Diong CP, Soysal T, Suzuki R, Tran HTT, Wu SJ, Owen C, Stilgenbauer S, Ghia P, Hillmen P. Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations. Leukemia 2021; 35:3059-3072. [PMID: 34168283 PMCID: PMC8550962 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01241-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Assessment of measurable residual disease (often referred to as "minimal residual disease") has emerged as a highly sensitive indicator of disease burden during and at the end of treatment and has been correlated with time-to-event outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Undetectable-measurable residual disease status at the end of treatment demonstrated independent prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, correlating with favorable progression-free and overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy. Given its utility in evaluating depth of response, determining measurable residual disease status is now a focus of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Increased adoption of measurable residual disease assessment calls for standards for nomenclature and outcomes data reporting. In addition, many basic questions have not been systematically addressed. Here, we present the work of an international, multidisciplinary, 174-member panel convened to identify critical questions on key issues pertaining to measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, review evaluable data, develop unified answers in conjunction with local expert input, and provide recommendations for future studies. Recommendations are presented regarding methodology for measurable residual disease determination, assay requirements and in which tissue to assess measurable residual disease, timing and frequency of assessment, use of measurable residual disease in clinical practice versus clinical trials, and the future usefulness of measurable residual disease assessment. Nomenclature is also proposed. Adoption of these recommendations will work toward standardizing data acquisition and interpretation in future studies with new treatments with the ultimate objective of improving outcomes and curing chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Florence Cymbalista
- Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, UMR Université Paris13/INSERM U978, Bobigny, France
| | | | - Davide Rossi
- Hematology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer R Brown
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Egle
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | - Yair Herishanu
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Teoman Soysal
- Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Shang-Ju Wu
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Stephan Stilgenbauer
- Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm and Internal Medicine 1, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Paolo Ghia
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uchiyama T, Yokoyama A, Aoki S. Measurable residual disease in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Exp Hematop 2020; 60:138-145. [PMID: 33148932 PMCID: PMC7810249 DOI: 10.3960/jslrt.20014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment outcomes of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have improved since
chemoimmunotherapy and novel drugs became available for CLL treatment; therefore, more
sensitive methods to evaluate residual CLL cells in patients are required. Measurable
residual disease (MRD) has been assessed in several clinical trials on CLL using flow
cytometry, real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO)
primers, and high-throughput sequencing. MRD assessment is useful to predict the treatment
outcomes in the context of chemotherapy and treatment with novel drugs such as venetoclax.
In this review, we discuss major techniques for MRD assessment, data from relevant
clinical trials, and the future of MRD assessment in CLL treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayoshi Uchiyama
- Niigata University of Pharmacy and Applied Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pathophysiology, Niigata, Japan
| | - Aki Yokoyama
- Niigata University of Pharmacy and Applied Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pathophysiology, Niigata, Japan
| | - Sadao Aoki
- Niigata University of Pharmacy and Applied Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pathophysiology, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prognostic value of high-sensitivity measurable residual disease assessment after front-line chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2020; 35:1597-1609. [PMID: 32934355 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01009-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) status is widely adopted in clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Findings from FILO group trials (CLL2007FMP, CLL2007SA, CLL2010FMP) enabled investigation of the prognostic value of high-sensitivity (0.7 × 10-5) MRD assessment using flow cytometry, in blood (N = 401) and bone marrow (N = 339), after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)-based chemoimmunotherapy in a homogeneous population with long follow-up (median 49.5 months). Addition of low-level positive MRD < 0.01% to MRD ≥ 0.01% increased the proportion of cases with positive MRD in blood by 39% and in bone marrow by 27%. Compared to low-level positive MRD < 0.01%, undetectable MRD was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) when using blood (72.2 versus 42.7 months; hazard ratio 0.40, p = 0.0003), but not when using bone marrow. Upon further stratification, positive blood MRD at any level, compared to undetectable blood MRD, was associated with shorter PFS irrespective of clinical complete or partial remission, and a lower 5-year PFS rate irrespective of IGHV-mutated or -unmutated status (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, high-sensitivity (0.0007%) MRD assessment in blood yielded additional prognostic information beyond the current standard sensitivity (0.01%). Our approach provides a model for future determination of the optimal MRD investigative strategy for any regimen.
Collapse
|
7
|
Goshaw JM, Gao Q, Wardrope J, Dogan A, Roshal M. 14-Color single tube for flow cytometric characterization of CD5+ B-LPDs and high sensitivity automated minimal residual disease quantitation of CLL/SLL. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2020; 100:509-518. [PMID: 32896973 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The diagnosis of CLL/SLL relies on flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Increasing emphasis is being placed on precise detection of the minimal residual disease. Following antigen recommendations of ERIC and ESCCA's Harmonization Project, we validated a 14-color assay for the characterization CD5+ lymphoproliferative neoplasms and CLL MRD with a sensitivity of at least 10-4 . METHODS The assay was designed based on ERIC/ESCCA recommended antigens with the addition of CD40 for alternate gating when CD19 expression is reduced. Lower limit of quantitation/lower limit of detection, assay procedural precision, linearity, and limit of blank were established. Then, 52 CD5+ B-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms (41 CLL/11 non-CLL) and 29 normal samples were used for parallel evaluation. Automated cluster identification and quantitation of CLL clones in MRD setting was performed using Barned-Hutt SNE. Separation analysis between CLL and non-CLL phenotypes was performed by PCA and bh-SNE. RESULTS Separation ratios for each antigen exceeded ERIC/ESCCA guidelines. Precision was <20% at LLOQ (0.01%). The limit of blank was <10/500,000 cells. Concordance between the 14-color and legacy assay (Deming regression y = 1.01x, r2 = .99) was seen. All 20 samples with MRD levels 0.5%-0.006% (median 0.04%) showed an abnormal cell cluster by bh-SNE, with concordant results between manual and automated quantitation (y = x, r2 = 1). CLL cases clustered together and away from mantle cell lymphoma by bh-SNE and PCA with outlier atypical phenotype CLL cases posing diagnostic challenges by both manual and automated analysis. CONCLUSION The 14-color CD5+ LPD assay provides a robust standardization platform for MRD and disease characterization using both manual and automated analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Goshaw
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Service, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qi Gao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Service, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Wardrope
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Service, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmet Dogan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Service, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mikhail Roshal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Service, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A flexible, robust microbead-based assay for quantification and normalization of target protein concentrations. Anal Biochem 2019; 590:113510. [PMID: 31758924 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.113510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Although there are many methods for quantifying the concentration of specific proteins in samples, current techniques are technically challenging or do not easily lend themselves to normalization. Here, we describe a microbead-based assay for quantifying specific protein concentration(s) that is high-throughput, inexpensive, simple-to-use, and intrinsically incorporates normalization against the sample total protein content. This assay, termed the FRANC assay, exploits high affinity biotin-streptavidin binding to couple sample proteins to streptavidin-labelled magnetic microbeads. Proteins are then antibody-probed, followed by labeling of proteins on the microbead with fluorescent dye, and flow cytometry-based analysis. The FRANC assay demonstrates detection limits for target proteins in the femtogram range, with a linear range up to as much as 10 ng. Normalization of target protein concentrations resulted in an 80% reduction in variability as compared to non-normalized measurements. We conclude that the FRANC assay offers attractive advantages over current methods for quantifying specific protein(s) in samples.
Collapse
|
9
|
Del Giudice I, Raponi S, Della Starza I, De Propris MS, Cavalli M, De Novi LA, Cappelli LV, Ilari C, Cafforio L, Guarini A, Foà R. Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A New Goal? Front Oncol 2019; 9:689. [PMID: 31555576 PMCID: PMC6727319 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), there is a growing interest for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, due to the availability of drug combinations capable of unprecedented complete clinical responses. The standardized and most commonly applied methods to assess MRD in CLL are based on flow cytometry (FCM) and, to a lesser extent, real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) primers of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (IgH). Promising results are being obtained using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches, with some advantages and a potential higher sensitivity compared to the standardized methodologies. Plasma cell-free DNA can also be explored as a more precise measure of residual disease from all different compartments, including the lymph nodes. From a clinical point of view, CLL MRD quantification has proven an independent prognostic marker of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after chemoimmunotherapy as well as after allogeneic transplantation. In the era of mechanism-driven drugs, the paradigms of CLL treatment are being revolutionized, challenging the use of chemoimmunotherapy even in first-line. The continuous administration of ibrutinib single agent has led to prolonged PFS and OS in relapsed/refractory and treatment naïve CLL, including those with TP53 deletion/mutation or unmutated IGHV genes, though the clinical responses are rarely complete. More recently, chemo-free combinations of venetoclax+rituximab, venetoclax+obinutuzumab or ibrutinib+venetoclax have been shown capable of inducing undetectable MRD in the bone marrow, opening the way to protocols exploring a MRD-based duration of treatment, aiming at disease eradication. Thus, beside a durable disease control desirable particularly for older patients and/or for those with comorbidities, a MRD-negative complete remission is becoming a realistic prospect for CLL patients in an attempt to obtain a long-lasting eradication and possibly cure of the disease. Here we discuss the standardized and innovative technical approaches for MRD detection in CLL, the clinical impact of MRD monitoring in chemoimmunotherapy and chemo-free trials and the future clinical implications of MRD monitoring in CLL patients outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Del Giudice
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Raponi
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Della Starza
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,GIMEMA Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Stefania De Propris
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Cavalli
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Anna De Novi
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Vincenzo Cappelli
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Ilari
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciana Cafforio
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Guarini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Robin Foà
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tomuleasa C, Selicean C, Cismas S, Jurj A, Marian M, Dima D, Pasca S, Petrushev B, Moisoiu V, Micu WT, Vischer A, Arifeen K, Selicean S, Zdrenghea M, Bumbea H, Tanase A, Grewal R, Pop L, Aanei C, Berindan-Neagoe I. Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A consensus paper that presents the clinical impact of the presently available laboratory approaches. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2018; 55:329-345. [PMID: 29801428 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2018.1463508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a malignancy defined by the accumulation of mature lymphocytes in the lymphoid tissues, bone marrow, and blood. Therapy for CLL is guided according to the Rai and Binet staging systems. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art protocols in disease monitoring, diagnostics, and prognostics for CLL are based on the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). MRD is internationally considered to be the level of disease that can be detected by sensitive techniques and represents incomplete treatment and a probability of disease relapse. MRD detection has been continuously improved by the quick development of both flow cytometry and molecular biology technology, as well as by next-generation sequencing. Considering that MRD detection is moving more and more from research to clinical practice, where it can be an independent prognostic marker, in this paper, we present the methodologies by which MRD is evaluated, from translational research to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciprian Tomuleasa
- a Department of Hematology , Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center , Cluj Napoca , Romania.,b Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine/Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Cristina Selicean
- a Department of Hematology , Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Sonia Cismas
- c Department of Genetics , Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Timisoara , Romania.,d Department of Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Anca Jurj
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Mirela Marian
- a Department of Hematology , Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Delia Dima
- a Department of Hematology , Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Sergiu Pasca
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Bobe Petrushev
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Vlad Moisoiu
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Wilhelm-Thomas Micu
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Anna Vischer
- d Department of Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Kanza Arifeen
- d Department of Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Sonia Selicean
- d Department of Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Mihnea Zdrenghea
- a Department of Hematology , Ion Chiricuta Clinical Cancer Center , Cluj Napoca , Romania.,d Department of Hematology , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Horia Bumbea
- f Department of Hematology , Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Bucharest , Romania.,g Department of Hematology , University Clinical Hospital , Bucharest , Romania
| | - Alina Tanase
- h Department of Stem Cell Transplantation , Fundeni Clinical Institute , Bucharest , Romania
| | - Ravnit Grewal
- i South African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit , The South African National Bioinformatics Institute (SANBI), University of the Western Cape , Bellville , South Africa
| | - Laura Pop
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| | - Carmen Aanei
- j Hematology Laboratory, Pole de Biologie-Pathologie , University Hospital of St. Etienne , St. Etienne , France
| | - Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
- e Research Center for Functional Genomics and Translational Medicine , Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj Napoca , Romania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Measurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2017; 2017:6501046. [PMID: 28698768 PMCID: PMC5494111 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6501046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 438] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Oxidative stress is the result of the imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. Biomarkers of oxidative stress are relevant in the evaluation of the disease status and of the health-enhancing effects of antioxidants. We aim to discuss the major methodological bias of methods used for the evaluation of oxidative stress in humans. There is a lack of consensus concerning the validation, standardization, and reproducibility of methods for the measurement of the following: (1) ROS in leukocytes and platelets by flow cytometry, (2) markers based on ROS-induced modifications of lipids, DNA, and proteins, (3) enzymatic players of redox status, and (4) total antioxidant capacity of human body fluids. It has been suggested that the bias of each method could be overcome by using indexes of oxidative stress that include more than one marker. However, the choice of the markers considered in the global index should be dictated by the aim of the study and its design, as well as by the clinical relevance in the selected subjects. In conclusion, the clinical significance of biomarkers of oxidative stress in humans must come from a critical analysis of the markers that should give an overall index of redox status in particular conditions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Brotchie J, Chapple P, Came N, Liew D, Juneja S. Reference ranges of peripheral blood lymphoid subsets by 10-colour flow cytometry based on 69 healthy adults from Australia. Pathology 2016; 48:631-4. [PMID: 27596237 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Brotchie
- Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
| | - P Chapple
- Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - N Came
- Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - D Liew
- Department of Clinical Outcomes Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - S Juneja
- Department of Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an European Research Initiative on CLL study. Leukemia 2015; 30:929-36. [PMID: 26639181 PMCID: PMC4832072 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy is an independent predictor of outcome. Given the increasing number of new agents being explored for CLL therapy, using MRD as a surrogate could greatly reduce the time necessary to assess their efficacy. In this European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) project we have identified and validated a flow-cytometric approach to reliably quantitate CLL cells to the level of 0.0010% (10−5). The assay comprises a core panel of six markers (i.e. CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b and CD81) with a component specification independent of instrument and reagents, which can be locally re-validated using normal peripheral blood. This method is directly comparable to previous ERIC-designed assays and also provides a backbone for investigation of new markers. A parallel analysis of high-throughput sequencing using the ClonoSEQ assay showed good concordance with flow cytometry results at the 0.010% (10−4) level, the MRD threshold defined in the 2008 International Workshop on CLL guidelines, but it also provides good linearity to a detection limit of 1 in a million (10−6). The combination of both technologies would permit a highly sensitive approach to MRD detection while providing a reproducible and broadly accessible method to quantify residual disease and optimize treatment in CLL.
Collapse
|
14
|
Eliminating minimal residual disease as a therapeutic end point: working toward cure for patients with CLL. Blood 2015; 127:279-86. [PMID: 26576865 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-634816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep remission and prolonged disease-free survival can be achieved with first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), such as combined fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, in the majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). More modest results are reported with less intense regimens like obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil. Clinical assessment has limited sensitivity in detecting residual disease responsible for subsequent relapse, even including morphologic bone marrow (BM) evaluation. Multicolor flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods can detect minimal residual disease (MRD) to a sensitivity of ≥1:10,000 (10(-4)). Achieving BM MRD-negative complete remission (CR) is associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival; MRD status is the single best posttreatment predictor of long-term outcomes after CIT. Newer oral B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors are highly effective at controlling disease, but best monotherapy responses are typically partial remission, and patients must remain on treatment to maintain disease control. Therapeutic progress is still needed for CLL. We propose that targeting MRD provides opportunity to realize this progress. Achieving BM MRD-negative CR is a prerequisite for long-term unmaintained disease-free survival and potential for cure. We review available methodologies for detecting MRD and correlations with posttreatment outcomes. We discuss the potential utility of MRD to direct individualized therapy. Finally, we discuss the importance of MRD-negative status as a surrogate marker for longer PFS in clinical studies to allow more rapid determination of clinical benefit.
Collapse
|
15
|
Melzer S, Zachariae S, Bocsi J, Engel C, Löffler M, Tárnok A. Reference intervals for leukocyte subsets in adults: Results from a population-based study using 10-color flow cytometry. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2015; 88:270-81. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2014] [Revised: 01/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Melzer
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology; Heart Center Leipzig GmbH, Universität Leipzig; Strümpellstr. 39 Leipzig D-04289 Germany
| | - Silke Zachariae
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology; Universität Leipzig; Härtelstraße 16-18 Leipzig D- 04107 Germany
| | - Jozsef Bocsi
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology; Heart Center Leipzig GmbH, Universität Leipzig; Strümpellstr. 39 Leipzig D-04289 Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology; Universität Leipzig; Härtelstraße 16-18 Leipzig D- 04107 Germany
| | - Markus Löffler
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology; Universität Leipzig; Härtelstraße 16-18 Leipzig D- 04107 Germany
| | - Attila Tárnok
- LIFE; Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases; Universität Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology; Heart Center Leipzig GmbH, Universität Leipzig; Strümpellstr. 39 Leipzig D-04289 Germany
- Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine (TRM) Leipzig; Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55 Leipzig D-04103 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ringelstein-Harlev S, Fineman R. Minimal residual disease surveillance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2014; 5:e0027. [PMID: 25386343 PMCID: PMC4222416 DOI: 10.5041/rmmj.10161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Achievement of complete response (CR) to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has become a feasible goal, directly correlating with prolonged survival. It has been established that the classic definition of CR actually encompasses a variety of disease loads, and more sensitive multiparameter flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction methods can detect the disease burden with a much higher sensitivity. Detection of malignant cells with a sensitivity of 1 tumor cell in 10,000 cells (10(-4)), using the abovementioned sophisticated techniques, is the current cutoff for minimal residual disease (MRD). Tumor burdens lower than 10(-4) are defined as MRD-negative. Several studies in CLL have determined the achievement of MRD negativity as an independent favorable prognostic factor, leading to prolonged disease-free and overall survival, regardless of the treatment protocol or the presence of other pre-existing prognostic indicators. Minimal residual disease evaluation using flow cytometry is a sensitive and applicable approach which is expected to become an integral part of future prospective trials in CLL designed to assess the role of MRD surveillance in treatment tailoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimrit Ringelstein-Harlev
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel ; Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Riva Fineman
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raponi S, Della Starza I, De Propris MS, Del Giudice I, Mauro FR, Marinelli M, Di Maio V, Piciocchi A, Foà R, Guarini A. Minimal residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. A comparative analysis of flow cytometry and ASO IgH RQ-PCR. Br J Haematol 2014; 166:360-8. [PMID: 24735016 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Accepted: 02/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming increasingly important in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) as treatment strategies are progressively improving. The primary objective of this study was to compare the applicability of three different flow cytometric approaches: basic 4-colour analysis, European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) consensus method and 8-colour analysis. Secondly, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of flow cytometry (FC) compared to molecular analyses for MRD detection. A total of 462 CLL samples were evaluated by basic FC; in 143, ERIC consensus method was also performed and all three FC methodologies were applied in a subgroup of 10 cases. No discordance in defining MRD-positive/negative samples was observed between the FC methods; within positive samples, the ERIC consensus method and 8-colour analysis showed the most accurate results. MRD was analysed by FC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 243 cases: concordant results were obtained in 199/243 samples (81·9%); 42/243 were FC-/PCR+. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of FC compared to PCR was 96·5% and 77·2%, respectively. Both FC and PCR proved suitable for the detection of MRD and prediction of progression-free survival, which was significantly reduced in MRD-positive patients, regardless of the methodology. These results offer the rationale for a strategy to monitor MRD in CLL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Raponi
- Haematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Haematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stehlíková O, Chovancová J, Tichý B, Krejčí M, Brychtová Y, Panovská A, Francová Skuhrová H, Burčková K, Borský M, Loja T, Mayer J, Pospíšilová S, Doubek M. Detecting minimal residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia using 8-color flow cytometry protocol in routine hematological practice. Int J Lab Hematol 2013; 36:165-71. [PMID: 24028768 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection has become increasingly important for the assessment of therapy response in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, current MRD analysis methods, both molecular genetic and flow cytometric, are time-consuming and require experienced laboratory staff. METHODS To reduce the demands of flow cytometric MRD detection in CLL, we have introduced a novel flow cytometric 8-color protocol. The MRD analysis results using this protocol were then compared with the commonly employed 4-color protocol and the molecular genetic (real-time quantitative allele-specific oligonucleotide IGH polymerase chain reaction; RQ-ASO IGH PCR) approach. RESULTS Forty-two CLL patient samples were repeatedly analyzed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n = 20) or after fludarabine-based therapy (n = 22), and 100% concordance was found using both flow cytometric protocols. Furthermore, there was a strong correlation (r = 0.94) between flow cytometric and RQ-ASO IGH PCR results in MRD detection. CONCLUSION Flow cytometry is less time-consuming, less financially demanding, and moreover, MRD assessment using our novel 8-color protocol is less complicated than the 4-color approach and molecular methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Stehlíková
- Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Brno and Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|