1
|
Gøtzsche PC, Demasi M. Interventions to help patients withdraw from depression drugs: A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE 2024; 35:103-116. [PMID: 37718853 DOI: 10.3233/jrs-230011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression drugs can be difficult to come off due to withdrawal symptoms. Gradual tapering with tapering support is needed to help patients withdraw safely. OBJECTIVE To review the withdrawal success rates, using any intervention, and the effects on relapse/recurrence rates, symptom severity, quality of life, and withdrawal symptoms. METHODS Systematic review based on PubMed and Embase searches (last search 4 October 2022) of randomised trials with one or more treatment arms aimed at helping patients withdraw from a depression drug, regardless of indication for treatment. We calculated the mean and median success rates and the risk difference of depressive relapse when discontinuing or continuing depression drugs. RESULTS We included 13 studies (2085 participants). Three compared two withdrawal interventions and ten compared drug discontinuation vs. continuation. The success rates varied hugely between the trials (9% to 80%), with a weighted mean of 47% (95% confidence interval 38% to 57%) and a median of 50% (interquartile range 29% to 65%). A meta-regression showed that the length of taper was highly predictive for the risk of relapse (P = 0.00001). All the studies we reviewed confounded withdrawal symptoms with relapse; did not use hyperbolic tapering; withdrew the depression drug too fast; and stopped it entirely when receptor occupancy was still high. CONCLUSION The true proportion of patients on depression drugs who can stop safely without relapse is likely considerably higher than the 50% we found.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Liao Y, Guo L, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Lai W, Teopiz KM, Song W, Zhu D, Li L, Lu C, Fan B, McIntyre RS. Association between childhood trauma and medication adherence among patients with major depressive disorder: the moderating role of resilience. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:644. [PMID: 36241986 PMCID: PMC9563806 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04297-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal medication adherence is a major reason for failure in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD), childhood trauma might be an essential risk factor of suboptimal medication adherence. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the associations between different types of childhood trauma and medication adherence among patients with MDD, and to test whether resilience has moderating effects on the foregoing associations. METHODS Participants were from the Depression Cohort in China (ChiCTR registry number 1900022145), 282 MDD patients with completed both baseline and 12-weeks follow-up investigations were included in this study. The diagnosis of MDD was assessed by trained psychiatrists using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.). Childhood trauma was evaluated using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-28 item Short Form (CTQ-SF), and resilience was evaluated using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Demographic characteristics, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, suicidal ideation, suicidal attempt, insomnia symptoms, and painful somatic symptoms were also investigated. Participants were divided into groups of optimal and suboptimal adherence based on their Medication Adherence Rating Scale scores. Logistic regression and stratified analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 234 participants (83%) reported suboptimal medication adherence. After adjusting for covariates, CTQ total scores (AOR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.06), CTQ measures of sexual abuse (AOR = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.01-1.37), and CTQ measures of physical neglect (AOR = 1.12, 95%CI = 1.02-1.23) were all associated with an increased likelihood of suboptimal adherence. There were significant moderating effects of resilience on the associations of childhood trauma (P = 0.039) and physical neglect (P = 0.034) with medication adherence. The stratification analyses showed that CTQ total scores and CTQ measures of physical neglect were independently associated with an increased risk of suboptimal adherence among patients with MDD with low-resilience or moderate-resilience, while not significantly associated with suboptimal adherence in those with high-resilience. CONCLUSION Childhood trauma was a significant risk factor of suboptimal adherence among patients with MDD, and resilience moderated the foregoing association. Obtaining a history of childhood trauma and assessing resilience may help identify patients with suboptimal adherence when providing MDD pharmacotherapy. Psychiatrists may consider enhancing resilience to cope with the adverse effects of childhood trauma on medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongqiong Wang
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080 People’s Republic of China ,grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China ,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuhua Liao
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080 People’s Republic of China ,grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China ,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China ,grid.512745.00000 0004 8015 6661Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, 7Huaming road, Shenzhen, 518000 People’s Republic of China
| | - Lan Guo
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080 People’s Republic of China ,grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China ,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huimin Zhang
- grid.512745.00000 0004 8015 6661Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, 7Huaming road, Shenzhen, 518000 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingli Zhang
- grid.452897.50000 0004 6091 8446Department of Depressive Disorder, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen Mental Health Center, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenjian Lai
- grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080 People’s Republic of China ,grid.12981.330000 0001 2360 039XGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China ,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kayla M. Teopiz
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8 Canada
| | - Weidong Song
- grid.512745.00000 0004 8015 6661Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, 7Huaming road, Shenzhen, 518000 People’s Republic of China
| | - Dongjian Zhu
- grid.512745.00000 0004 8015 6661Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, 7Huaming road, Shenzhen, 518000 People’s Republic of China
| | - Lingjiang Li
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ciyong Lu
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. .,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Beifang Fan
- Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, 7Huaming road, Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China.
| | - Roger S. McIntyre
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8 Canada ,grid.231844.80000 0004 0474 0428Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paulus MP, Kuplicki R, Victor TA, Yeh HW, Khalsa SS. Methylphenidate augmentation of escitalopram to enhance adherence to antidepressant treatment: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:582. [PMID: 34798853 PMCID: PMC8603485 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03583-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to treatment, i.e. the extent to which a patient's therapeutic engagement coincides with the prescribed treatment, is among the most important problems in mental health care. The current study investigated the influence of pairing an acute positive reinforcing dopaminergic/noradrenergic effect (methylphenidate, MPH) with a standard antidepressant on the rates of adherence to medication treatment. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether MPH + escitalopram resulted in higher rates of medication adherence relative to placebo + escitalopram. METHODS Twenty participants with moderate to severe depression were 1-1 randomized to either (1) 5 mg MPH + 10 mg escitalopram or (2) placebo + 10 mg escitalopram with the possibility for a dose increase at 4 weeks. A Bayesian analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS First, neither percent Pill count nor Medication Electronic Monitoring System adherence showed that MPH was superior to placebo. In fact, placebo showed slightly higher adherence rates on the primary (7.82% better than MPH) and secondary (7.07% better than MPH) outcomes. There was a less than 25% chance of MPH augmentation showing at least as good or better adherence than placebo. Second, both groups showed a significant effect of treatment on the QIDS-SR with a median effect of an 8.6-point score reduction. Third, neither subjective measures of adherence attitudes nor socio-demographic covariates had a significant influence on the primary or secondary outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS These data do not support the use of MPH to increase adherence to antidepressant medication in individuals with moderate to severe depression. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03388164 , registered on 01/02/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P. Paulus
- grid.417423.70000 0004 0512 8863Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326 USA ,grid.267360.60000 0001 2160 264XOxley College of Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK USA
| | - Rayus Kuplicki
- grid.417423.70000 0004 0512 8863Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326 USA
| | - Teresa A. Victor
- grid.417423.70000 0004 0512 8863Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326 USA
| | - Hung-Wen Yeh
- grid.417423.70000 0004 0512 8863Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326 USA ,grid.239559.10000 0004 0415 5050Health Services & Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO USA
| | - Sahib S. Khalsa
- grid.417423.70000 0004 0512 8863Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326 USA ,grid.267360.60000 0001 2160 264XOxley College of Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Leeuwen E, van Driel ML, Horowitz MA, Kendrick T, Donald M, De Sutter AI, Robertson L, Christiaens T. Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 4:CD013495. [PMID: 33886130 PMCID: PMC8092632 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013495.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety are the most frequent indication for which antidepressants are prescribed. Long-term antidepressant use is driving much of the internationally observed rise in antidepressant consumption. Surveys of antidepressant users suggest that 30% to 50% of long-term antidepressant prescriptions had no evidence-based indication. Unnecessary use of antidepressants puts people at risk of adverse events. However, high-certainty evidence is lacking regarding the effectiveness and safety of approaches to discontinuing long-term antidepressants. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched all databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) until January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing approaches to discontinuation with continuation of antidepressants (or usual care) for people with depression or anxiety who are prescribed antidepressants for at least six months. Interventions included discontinuation alone (abrupt or taper), discontinuation with psychological therapy support, and discontinuation with minimal intervention. Primary outcomes were successful discontinuation rate, relapse (as defined by authors of the original study), withdrawal symptoms, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, quality of life, social and occupational functioning, and severity of illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included 33 studies involving 4995 participants. Nearly all studies were conducted in a specialist mental healthcare service and included participants with recurrent depression (i.e. two or more episodes of depression prior to discontinuation). All included trials were at high risk of bias. The main limitation of the review is bias due to confounding withdrawal symptoms with symptoms of relapse of depression. Withdrawal symptoms (such as low mood, dizziness) may have an effect on almost every outcome including adverse events, quality of life, social functioning, and severity of illness. Abrupt discontinuation Thirteen studies reported abrupt discontinuation of antidepressant. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that abrupt discontinuation without psychological support may increase risk of relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 2.74; 1373 participants, 10 studies) and there is insufficient evidence of its effect on adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.99; 1012 participants, 7 studies; I² = 37%) compared to continuation of antidepressants, without specific assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Evidence about the effects of abrupt discontinuation on withdrawal symptoms (1 study) is very uncertain. None of these studies included successful discontinuation rate as a primary endpoint. Discontinuation by "taper" Eighteen studies examined discontinuation by "tapering" (one week or longer). Most tapering regimens lasted four weeks or less. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that "tapered" discontinuation may lead to higher risk of relapse (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.93; 1546 participants, 13 studies) with no or little difference in adverse events (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.38; 1479 participants, 7 studies; I² = 0%) compared to continuation of antidepressants, without specific assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Evidence about the effects of discontinuation on withdrawal symptoms (1 study) is very uncertain. Discontinuation with psychological support Four studies reported discontinuation with psychological support. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that initiation of preventive cognitive therapy (PCT), or MBCT, combined with "tapering" may result in successful discontinuation rates of 40% to 75% in the discontinuation group (690 participants, 3 studies). Data from control groups in these studies were requested but are not yet available. Low-certainty evidence suggests that discontinuation combined with psychological intervention may result in no or little effect on relapse (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19; 690 participants, 3 studies) compared to continuation of antidepressants. Withdrawal symptoms were not measured. Pooling data on adverse events was not possible due to insufficient information (3 studies). Discontinuation with minimal intervention Low-certainty evidence from one study suggests that a letter to the general practitioner (GP) to review antidepressant treatment may result in no or little effect on successful discontinuation rate compared to usual care (6% versus 8%; 146 participants, 1 study) or on relapse (relapse rate 26% vs 13%; 146 participants, 1 study). No data on withdrawal symptoms nor adverse events were provided. None of the studies used low-intensity psychological interventions such as online support or a changed pharmaceutical formulation that allows tapering with low doses over several months. Insufficient data were available for the majority of people taking antidepressants in the community (i.e. those with only one or no prior episode of depression), for people aged 65 years and older, and for people taking antidepressants for anxiety. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Currently, relatively few studies have focused on approaches to discontinuation of long-term antidepressants. We cannot make any firm conclusions about effects and safety of the approaches studied to date. The true effect and safety are likely to be substantially different from the data presented due to assessment of relapse of depression that is confounded by withdrawal symptoms. All other outcomes are confounded with withdrawal symptoms. Most tapering regimens were limited to four weeks or less. In the studies with rapid tapering schemes the risk of withdrawal symptoms may be similar to studies using abrupt discontinuation which may influence the effectiveness of the interventions. Nearly all data come from people with recurrent depression. There is an urgent need for trials that adequately address withdrawal confounding bias, and carefully distinguish relapse from withdrawal symptoms. Future studies should report key outcomes such as successful discontinuation rate and should include populations with one or no prior depression episodes in primary care, older people, and people taking antidepressants for anxiety and use tapering schemes longer than 4 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Van Leeuwen
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mieke L van Driel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mark A Horowitz
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Maria Donald
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - An Im De Sutter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lindsay Robertson
- Cochrane Common Mental Disorders, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Thierry Christiaens
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schroder HS, Duda JM, Christensen K, Beard C, Björgvinsson T. Stressors and chemical imbalances: Beliefs about the causes of depression in an acute psychiatric treatment sample. J Affect Disord 2020; 276:537-545. [PMID: 32807732 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public perceptions of mental illness are increasingly construed in neurobiological and genetic terms. Accumulating evidence suggests there are some unintended consequences of these explanations, including reduced optimism for recovery among individuals with depression. However, little is known about how these beliefs relate to treatment process and outcomes in a psychiatric treatment setting, a gap this study aimed to fill. METHODS We examined etiological beliefs about depression in a sample of patients (N = 279) seeking acute treatment in a behaviorally-based therapy program at a psychiatric hospital and examined relations with treatment expectations and outcomes. RESULTS We found that although psychosocial explanations of depression were most popular, biogenetic beliefs, particularly the belief that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance, were prevalent in this sample. Further, the chemical imbalance belief related to poorer treatment expectations. This relationship was moderated by symptoms of depression, with more depressed individuals showing a stronger relationship between chemical imbalance beliefs and lower treatment expectations. Finally, the chemical imbalance belief predicted more depressive symptoms after the treatment program ended for a 2-week measure of depression (but not for a 24-hour measure of depression), controlling for psychiatric symptoms at admission, inpatient hospitalizations, and treatment expectations. LIMITATIONS The sample was homogenous in terms of race and ethnicity and we did not assess how patients came to their beliefs. CONCLUSIONS Together, the results illustrate the correlates and possible impacts of etiological beliefs in a real-world clinical setting and invite a critical discussion about predominant messages about the etiology of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica M Duda
- McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
| | | | - Courtney Beard
- McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khalifeh AH, Hamdan-Mansour AM. Prevalence, Barriers, and Interventions Related to Medication Adherence Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Scoping Review. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2020; 59:39-51. [PMID: 33095267 DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20201015-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The current scoping review aimed to identify the prevalence, contributing factors, methods of measurement, and interventions related to medication adherence among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 37 articles met inclusion criteria. The prevalence of medication adherence among patients with MDD ranged from 10.6% to 85.4%. Approximately 67% of studies used self-report data collection. Illness-related factors (e.g., onset of illness, duration of illness, symptoms, illness severity), medication-related factors (e.g., adverse reactions, duration of treatment, cost of treatment), and patient-related factors (e.g., beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, self-stigma) were the most reported factors associated with medication adherence. In addition, multi-faceted interventions were recommended over single-element interventions to enhance medication adherence. There is a need to integrate appropriate and effective assessment measures of medication adherence that lead to better health care outcomes, lower risk factors, and improved interventions related to medication adherence. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 59(1), 39-51.].
Collapse
|
7
|
Pahlevan T, Ung C, Segal Z. Cost-Utility Analysis of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy for Prevention of Depressive Relapse in a Canadian Context: Analyse coût-utilité de la thérapie cognitive basée sur la pleine conscience contre la pharmacothérapie antidépressive pour prévenir la rechute de la dépression en contexte canadien. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2020; 65:568-576. [PMID: 32031000 PMCID: PMC7492890 DOI: 10.1177/0706743720904613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) experience impaired functioning and reduced quality of life, including an elevated risk of episode return. MDD is associated with high societal burden due to increased healthcare utilization, productivity losses, and suicide-related costs, making the long-term management of this illness a priority. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), a first-line preventative psychological treatment, compared to maintenance antidepressant medication (ADM), the current standard of care. METHOD A cost-utility analysis was conducted over a 24-month time horizon to model differences between MBCT and ADM in cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The analysis was conducted using a decision tree analytic model. Intervention efficacy, utility, and costing data estimates were derived from published sources and expert consultation. RESULTS MBCT was found to be cost-effective compared to maintenance ADM over a 24-month time horizon. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy resulted in 1.10 QALY and $17,255.37 per patient on average, whereas MBCT resulted in 1.18 QALY and $15,030.70 per patient on average. This resulted in a cost difference of $2,224.67 and a QALY difference of 0.08, in favor of MBCT. Multiple sensitivity analyses supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS From both a societal and health system perspective, utilizing MBCT as a first-line relapse prevention treatment is potentially cost-effective in a Canadian setting. Future economic evaluations should consider combined treatment (e.g., ADM and psychotherapy) as a comparator and longer time horizons as the literature advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Pahlevan
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Ung
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zindel Segal
- Graduate Program in Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maund E, Stuart B, Moore M, Dowrick C, Geraghty AWA, Dawson S, Kendrick T. Managing Antidepressant Discontinuation: A Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med 2019; 17:52-60. [PMID: 30670397 PMCID: PMC6342590 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine the effectiveness of interventions to manage antidepressant discontinuation, and the outcomes for patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis of studies published to March 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies assessing interventions to facilitate discontinuation of antidepressants for depression in adults. Our primary outcomes were antidepressant discontinuation and discontinuation symptoms. Secondary outcomes were relapse/recurrence; quality of life; antidepressant reduction; and sexual, social, and occupational function. RESULTS Of 15 included studies, 12 studies (8 randomized controlled trials, 2 single-arm trials, 2 retrospective cohort studies) were included in the synthesis. None were rated as having high risk for selection or detection bias. Two studies prompting primary care clinician discontinuation with antidepressant tapering guidance found 6% and 7% of patients discontinued, vs 8% for usual care. Six studies of psychological or psychiatric treatment plus tapering reported cessation rates of 40% to 95%. Two studies reported a higher risk of discontinuation symptoms with abrupt termination. At 2 years, risk of relapse/recurrence was lower with cognitive behavioral therapy plus taper vs clinical management plus taper (15% to 25% vs 35% to 80%: risk ratio = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67; 2 studies). Relapse/recurrence rates were similar for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with tapering and maintenance antidepressants (44% to 48% vs 47% to 60%; 2 studies). CONCLUSIONS Cognitive behavioral therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy can help patients discontinue antidepressants without increasing the risk of relapse/recurrence, but are resource intensive. More scalable interventions incorporating psychological support are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Maund
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dawson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Groot PC, van Os J. Antidepressant tapering strips to help people come off medication more safely. PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1469163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C. Groot
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Psychosis Studies, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, Institute of Psychiatry , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Homework in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review of Adherence Assessment in Anxiety and Depression (2011-2016). Psychiatr Clin North Am 2017; 40:625-639. [PMID: 29080590 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Treatment adherence has posed a substantial challenge not only for patients but also for the health profession for many decades. The last 5 years has witnessed significant attention toward adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) homework for anxiety and depressive disorders, and adherence assessment methods have diversified. However, there remains a large component of the adherence process not assessed in CBT, with patient effort, engagement, and the known role for treatment appraisals and beliefs necessitating the pursuit of improved adherence assessment methods.
Collapse
|