1
|
Ferenchick EK, Randenikumara S, Dowrick C, Lionis C, Lam CLK, Green LA, Jortberg B. Bold action and collaboration for health for all. Lancet 2024; 403:1448. [PMID: 38614483 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00498-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Ferenchick
- Center for Family and Community Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christos Lionis
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Giofirakia, Greece
| | - Cindy L K Lam
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Larry A Green
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Bonnie Jortberg
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kendrick T, Dowrick C, Lewis G, Moore M, Leydon GM, Geraghty AW, Griffiths G, Zhu S, Yao GL, May C, Gabbay M, Dewar-Haggart R, Williams S, Bui L, Thompson N, Bridewell L, Trapasso E, Patel T, McCarthy M, Khan N, Page H, Corcoran E, Hahn JS, Bird M, Logan MX, Ching BCF, Tiwari R, Hunt A, Stuart B. Patient-reported outcome measures for monitoring primary care patients with depression: the PROMDEP cluster RCT and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-95. [PMID: 38551155 PMCID: PMC11017630 DOI: 10.3310/plrq4216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines on the management of depression recommend that practitioners use patient-reported outcome measures for the follow-up monitoring of symptoms, but there is a lack of evidence of benefit in terms of patient outcomes. Objective To test using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for monitoring depression, training practitioners in interpreting scores and giving patients feedback. Design Parallel-group, cluster-randomised superiority trial; 1 : 1 allocation to intervention and control. Setting UK primary care (141 group general practices in England and Wales). Inclusion criteria Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a new episode of depressive disorder or symptoms, recruited mainly through medical record searches, plus opportunistically in consultations. Exclusions Current depression treatment, dementia, psychosis, substance misuse and risk of suicide. Intervention Administration of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 questionnaire with patient feedback soon after diagnosis, and at follow-up 10-35 days later, compared with usual care. Primary outcome Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition, symptom scores at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition, scores at 26 weeks; antidepressant drug treatment and mental health service contacts; social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale) and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, five-level) at 12 and 26 weeks; service use over 26 weeks to calculate NHS costs; patient satisfaction at 26 weeks (Medical Informant Satisfaction Scale); and adverse events. Sample size The original target sample of 676 patients recruited was reduced to 554 due to finding a significant correlation between baseline and follow-up values for the primary outcome measure. Randomisation Remote computerised randomisation with minimisation by recruiting university, small/large practice and urban/rural location. Blinding Blinding of participants was impossible given the open cluster design, but self-report outcome measures prevented observer bias. Analysis was blind to allocation. Analysis Linear mixed models were used, adjusted for baseline depression, baseline anxiety, sociodemographic factors, and clustering including practice as random effect. Quality of life and costs were analysed over 26 weeks. Qualitative interviews Practitioner and patient interviews were conducted to reflect on trial processes and use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 using the Normalization Process Theory framework. Results Three hundred and two patients were recruited in intervention arm practices and 227 patients were recruited in control practices. Primary outcome data were collected for 252 (83.4%) and 195 (85.9%), respectively. No significant difference in Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition, score was found at 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference -0.46, 95% confidence interval -2.16 to 1.26). Nor were significant differences found in Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition, score at 26 weeks, social functioning, patient satisfaction or adverse events. EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, quality-of-life scores favoured the intervention arm at 26 weeks (adjusted mean difference 0.053, 95% confidence interval 0.013 to 0.093). However, quality-adjusted life-years over 26 weeks were not significantly greater (difference 0.0013, 95% confidence interval -0.0157 to 0.0182). Costs were lower in the intervention arm but, again, not significantly (-£163, 95% confidence interval -£349 to £28). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, therefore, suggested that the intervention was dominant over usual care, but with considerable uncertainty around the point estimates. Patients valued using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to compare scores at baseline and follow-up, whereas practitioner views were more mixed, with some considering it too time-consuming. Conclusions We found no evidence of improved depression management or outcome at 12 weeks from using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, but patients' quality of life was better at 26 weeks, perhaps because feedback of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores increased their awareness of improvement in their depression and reduced their anxiety. Further research in primary care should evaluate patient-reported outcome measures including anxiety symptoms, administered remotely, with algorithms delivering clear recommendations for changes in treatment. Study registration This study is registered as IRAS250225 and ISRCTN17299295. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/42/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 17. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Kendrick
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Geraldine M Leydon
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Adam Wa Geraghty
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Guiqing Lily Yao
- Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Carl May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mark Gabbay
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rachel Dewar-Haggart
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Samantha Williams
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lien Bui
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie Thompson
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lauren Bridewell
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Emilia Trapasso
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tasneem Patel
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Molly McCarthy
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Naila Khan
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen Page
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Emma Corcoran
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Sungmin Hahn
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Molly Bird
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mekeda X Logan
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian Chi Fung Ching
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Riya Tiwari
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anna Hunt
- School of Primary Care, Population Health and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dowrick C. Medicine as a moral activity. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:1-2. [PMID: 38006212 PMCID: PMC10851805 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2285470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
|
4
|
Kendrick T, Dowrick C, Lewis G, Moore M, Leydon G, Geraghty AWA, Griffiths G, Zhu S, Yao G, May C, Gabbay M, Dewar-Haggart R, Williams S, Bui L, Thompson N, Bridewell L, Trapasso E, Patel T, McCarthy M, Khan N, Page H, Corcoran E, Hahn JS, Bird M, Logan MX, Ching BCF, Tiwari R, Hunt A, Stuart B. Depression follow-up monitoring with the PHQ-9: open cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0539. [PMID: 38408790 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcome monitoring of depression is recommended but lacks evidence of patient benefit in primary care. AIM To test monitoring depression using the PHQ-9 questionnaire with patient feedback. DESIGN AND SETTING Open cluster-randomised controlled trial in 141 group practices. METHOD Adults with new depressive episodes were recruited through records searches and opportunistically. EXCLUSION CRITERIA dementia, psychosis, substance misuse, suicide risk. The PHQ-9 questionnaire was to be administered soon after diagnosis, and 10-35 days later. PRIMARY OUTCOME Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score at 12 weeks. SECONDARY OUTCOMES BDI-II at 26 weeks; Work and Social Adjustment Scale and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L quality of life at 12 and 26 weeks; antidepressant treatment, mental health service use, adverse events, and Medical Informant Satisfaction Scale over 26 weeks. RESULTS 302 intervention arm patients were recruited and 227 controls. At 12 weeks 252 (83.4%) and 195 (85.9%) were followed-up respectively. Only 41% of intervention arm patients had a GP follow-up PHQ-9 recorded. There was no significant difference in BDI-II score at 12 weeks (mean difference -0.46; 95% CI -2.16,1.26), adjusted for baseline depression, baseline anxiety, sociodemographic factors, and clustering by practice). EQ-5D-5L quality of life scores were higher in the intervention arm at 26 weeks (adjusted mean difference 0.053; 95% CI 0.093,0.013). A clinically significant difference in depression at 26 weeks could not be ruled out. No significant differences were found in social functioning, adverse events, or satisfaction. In a per-protocol analysis, antidepressant use and mental health contacts were significantly greater in intervention arm patients with a recorded follow-up PHQ-9. CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found of improved depression outcome at 12 weeks from monitoring. The findings of possible benefits over 26 weeks warrant replication, investigating possible mechanisms, preferably with automated delivery of monitoring and more instructive feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Glyn Lewis
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, CTU, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Shihua Zhu
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, CTU, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Guiqing Yao
- University of Leicester, Department of Health Sciences, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Carl May
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Gabbay
- University of Liverpool, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Dewar-Haggart
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Williams
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lien Bui
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Thompson
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Bridewell
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Naila Khan
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Page
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Molly Bird
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Riya Tiwari
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Hunt
- Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Stuart
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bradley N, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. Explaining how and why social support groups in hospice day services benefit palliative care patients, for whom, and in what circumstances. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2023; 17:26323524231214549. [PMID: 38044931 PMCID: PMC10693225 DOI: 10.1177/26323524231214549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Palliative care aims to provide holistic support for people with life-limiting illness, responding to psychological, social and spiritual needs, as well as to clinical and physical. In the United Kingdom, hospice day services (including day care, group interventions, group activities, and social events for palliative care outpatients) aim to provide opportunities for patients to gain social support, which is thought to improve their quality of life. Objectives This research explored social support within hospice day services, to explain in detail how and why social support obtained within a hospice day service could be beneficial to palliative care patients. Design Qualitative research using observations of hospice day services and interviews with service providers. Methods Data collection involved nineteen interviews with hospice service providers (n = 19) and researcher observations of hospice day services. The findings detail how patient and hospice context interact to produce mechanisms that lead to outcomes beyond the hospice day service. Results Practical, clinical and social aspects of the hospice day service are important for patients feeling welcome and safe in the setting. The opportunity to connect with other people and work towards personal goals can boost self-confidence for patients who have lost access to meaningful activity. New friendships between patients encourages reciprocal support and feelings of belonging. It is beneficial to have permission to speak freely about topics deemed inappropriate elsewhere, because honest communication is helpful in accepting and adapting to their circumstances. Conclusion Hospice day services facilitate group settings for reciprocal social support. This research proposes an initial programme theory that can be further developed and tested. It explains how and why, in some contexts, social support increases personal and practical resources to cope with illness and death, leading to changes outside of the hospice (to mood, interpersonal interactions and behaviour) that could improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Bradley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
- Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England (UWE), Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lian OS, Nettleton S, Grange H, Dowrick C. 'My cousin said to me . . .' Patients' use of third-party references to facilitate shared decision-making during naturally occurring primary care consultations. Health (London) 2023:13634593231188489. [PMID: 37519043 DOI: 10.1177/13634593231188489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the ways in which patients invoke third parties to gain decision-making influence in clinical consultations. The patients' role in decision-making processes is often overlooked, and this interactional practice has rarely been systematically studied. Through a contextual narrative exploration of 42 naturally occurring consultations between patients (aged 22-84) and general practitioners (GPs) in England, we seek to fill this gap. By exploring how and why patients invoke third parties during discussions about medical treatments, who they refer to, what kind of knowledge their referents possess, and how GPs respond, our main aim is to capture the functions and implications of this interactional practice in relation to decision-making processes. Patients refer to third parties during decision-making processes in most of the consultations, usually to argue for and against certain treatment options, and the GPs recognise these utterances as pro-and-contra arguments. This enables patients to counter the GPs' professional knowledge through various knowledge-sources and encourage the GPs to target their specific concerns. By attributing arguments to third parties, patients claim decision-making influence without threatening the GPs' authority and expertise, which their disadvantaged epistemic position demands. Thereby, patients become able to negotiate their role and their epistemic position, to influence the agenda-setting, and to take part in the decision-making process, without being directly confrontational. Invoking third parties is a non-confrontational way of proposing and opposing treatment options that might facilitate successful patient participation in decision-making processes, and so limit the risk of patients being wronged in their capacity as knowers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Nettleton
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
- University of York, UK
| | - Huw Grange
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arroll B, Roskvist R, Moir F, Harwood M, Eggleton K, Dowrick C, Cuijpers P. Antidepressants in primary care: limited value at the first visit. World Psychiatry 2023; 22:340. [PMID: 37159355 PMCID: PMC10168160 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Arroll
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rachel Roskvist
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Fiona Moir
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Matire Harwood
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kyle Eggleton
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lian OS, Nettleton S, Grange H, Dowrick C. ‘I’d best take out life insurance, then.’ Conceptualisations of risk and uncertainty in primary care consultations, and implications for shared decision-making. Health, Risk & Society 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2023.2197780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
9
|
Lynch JM, van Driel M, Meredith P, Stange KC, Getz L, Reeve J, Miller WL, Dowrick C. The Craft of Generalism clinical skills and attitudes for whole person care. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:1187-1194. [PMID: 34652051 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Generalists manage a broad range of biomedical and biographical knowledge as part of each clinical encounter, often in multiple encounters over time. The sophistication of this broad integrative work is often misunderstood by those schooled in reductionist or constructivist approaches to evidence. There is a need to describe the practical and philosophically robust ways that understanding about the whole person is formed. In this paper we describe first principles of generalist approaches to knowledge formation in clinical practice. We name the Craft of Generalism. METHODS The newly described methodology of Transdisciplinary Generalism is examined by skilled generalist clinicians and translated into skills and attitudes useful for everyday generalist person-centred practice and research. RESULTS The Craft of Generalism defines the required scope, process, priorities, and knowledge management skills of all generalists seeking to care for the whole person. These principles are Whole Person Scope, Relational Process, Healing Orientation, and Integrative Wisdom. These skills and attitudes are required for whole person care. If any element of these first principles is left out, the resultant knowledge is incomplete and philosophically incoherent. CONCLUSIONS Naming the Craft of Generalism defines the generalist gaze and protects generalism from the colonization of a narrowed medical gaze that excludes all but reductionist evidence or constructivist experience. Defining the Craft of Generalism enables clear teaching of the sophisticated skills and attitudes of the generalist clinician. These philosophically robust principles encourage and defend the use of generalist approaches to knowledge in settings across the community - including health policy, education, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M Lynch
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Integrate Place at Zest Infusion, Birkdale, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mieke van Driel
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pamela Meredith
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kurt C Stange
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Linn Getz
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Joanne Reeve
- Primary Care Research, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - William L Miller
- Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lian OS, Nettleton S, Grange H, Dowrick C. 'It feels like my metabolism has shut down'. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation. Health Expect 2022; 26:366-375. [PMID: 36385430 PMCID: PMC9854284 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our aim is to explore the ways in which a patient and a general practitioner (GP) negotiate knowledge claims stemming from different epistemic domains while dealing with a mismatch between experiential and biomedical knowledge during the clinical consultation. We interpret their interaction in relation to the sociocultural context in which their negotiation is embedded and identify factors facilitating their successful negotiation (a medical error is avoided). METHODS Based on a narrative analysis of a verbatim transcript of a complete naturally occurring primary care consultation, we explore the moment-to-moment unfolding of talk between the patient and the GP (two women). FINDINGS The patient experiences symptoms of what she interprets as a thyroid condition, and indirectly asks for medication. She presents her case by drawing on experiential knowledge ('it feels like my metabolism has shut down') and biomedical knowledge (while suggesting a diagnosis and a diagnostic test). The GP informs her that her thyroid blood tests are normal and uses biomedical knowledge to explain why she turns down the patient's request. This stages a potential conflict between the patient's embodied experiential knowledge and the doctor's biomedical knowledge. However, during their encounter, the patient and the GP manage to co-construct the patient's illness story and make shared decisions about further actions. CONCLUSION The transition from potential conflict to consensus is a result of the mutual efforts of two parties: a patient who persistently claims experiential as well as biomedical knowledge while at the same time deferring to the GP's professional knowledge, and a GP who maintains her epistemic authority while also acknowledging the patient's experiential and biomedical knowledge. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Our empirical data are sourced from a data archive and patients were not involved in the design or conduct of the study, but our study is based on a naturally occurring clinical consultation with a patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaug S. Lian
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT—The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | | | - Huw Grange
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT—The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bradley N, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. Feasibility of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Psychosocial Palliative Care: Observational Cohort Study of Hospice Day Care and Social Support Groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:13258. [PMID: 36293835 PMCID: PMC9603547 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care patients can be at risk of social isolation or loneliness. Interventions that can provide effective social support, and particularly emotional support, could facilitate healthy coping that bolsters quality of life and reduces depression in palliative care patients. This is an observational cohort study which recruited thirty patients (n = 30) from the day services of four independent hospices in England. Participants completed patient reported outcome measures in perceived social support, loneliness, and depression, at up to three time points. Age range was 56-91 years, males and females were equally represented, and the sample was 93% white British. In participants that provided two or more timepoints, perceived social support increased, and loneliness and depression decreased. Largest changes with the least variation between participants was in emotional support (p = 0.165) and loneliness (p = 0.104). These results suggest that the psychosocial patient reported outcome measures used (MOS-SS, UCLA, BEDS) could be sensitive to change aligned with the goals of this intervention in palliative care. Participants in this study were observed to derive psychosocial benefit from attending the hospice day service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Bradley
- Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dowrick C, Rosala-Hallas A, Rawlinson R, Khan N, Winrow E, Chiumento A, Burnside G, Aslam R, Billows L, Eriksson-Lee M, Lawrence D, McCluskey R, Mackinnon A, Moitt T, Orton L, Roberts E, Rahman A, Smith G, Tudor Edwards R, Uwamaliya P, White R. The Problem Management Plus psychosocial intervention for distressed and functionally impaired asylum seekers and refugees: the PROSPER feasibility RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/nzxa0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The prevalence of psychological morbidity among asylum seekers and refugees is high, but these groups encounter extensive barriers to accessing health and social care. The aim of the PROSPER study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial in the UK of Problem Management Plus (PM+), an evidence-based psychosocial intervention delivered by lay therapists for distressed and functionally impaired asylum seekers and refugees.
Design
We undertook a feasibility study of PM+, which included a pilot study of the design features of a future definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. The feasibility study involved the adaptation of PM+ based on evidence drawn from literature synthesis and local stakeholder engagement, and a two-stage training procedure for lay therapists. These were followed by a pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility of conducting a three-arm randomised controlled trial of five 90-minute sessions of PM+, delivered individually or in groups, with 105 participants randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to individual PM+, group PM+ or a control intervention. Primary health outcomes were anxiety and depressive symptoms at 3 months; other outcomes included post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, quality of life, progress with identified goals and service use.
Findings
We demonstrated that the form and content of PM+ could be adapted to meet the needs of asylum seekers and refugees. Twelve people with lived experience of the asylum process were successfully trained as lay therapists to deliver this targeted, low-intensity psychosocial intervention in local asylum seeker and refugee communities. The pilot trial was affected by governance issues. It began in December 2019 and was cut short by the COVID-19 pandemic. We were not able to complete recruitment and follow-up as planned; 11 out of 105 (10%) participants were recruited to the pilot trial (individual PM+, n = 4; group PM+, n = 3; control, n = 4); 8 out of 11 participants were followed up at 13 weeks and 7 out of 11 participants were followed up at 26 weeks. (Preliminary data were gathered on recruitment and retention, intervention fidelity and acceptability of study measures, including service use measures.)
Limitations
Protracted delays due to governance issues, followed by the COVID-19 pandemic, meant that we were unable to complete the pilot trial or to provide evidence regarding the feasibility of group PM+. The complexities of working with multiple languages and cultural groups were noted. There were mixed views on how successful PM+ might prove, and we had insufficient evidence to provide clear conclusions.
Future work
Future research could explore how technology can be used to improve the acceptability, feasibility, efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness of scalable mental health interventions and well-being support for distressed asylum seekers and refugees. The use of mobile phone and/or app-based forms of support may help to increase asylum seekers’ and refugees’ willingness to engage in research of this type.
Conclusions
Although it was not possible to specify the parameters for a full randomised controlled trial of PM+ for asylum seekers and refugees in the UK, our findings offer guidance on strategies that may be of value in future studies of this nature.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN15214107.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Dowrick
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Rosala-Hallas
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rebecca Rawlinson
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Naila Khan
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eira Winrow
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Anna Chiumento
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Girvan Burnside
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Lawrence
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Tracy Moitt
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lois Orton
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Atif Rahman
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Grahame Smith
- School of Nursing and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Philomene Uwamaliya
- School of Nursing and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ross White
- Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schiess N, Cataldi R, Okun MS, Fothergill-Misbah N, Dorsey ER, Bloem BR, Barretto M, Bhidayasiri R, Brown R, Chishimba L, Chowdhary N, Coslov M, Cubo E, Di Rocco A, Dolhun R, Dowrick C, Fung VSC, Gershanik OS, Gifford L, Gordon J, Khalil H, Kühn AA, Lew S, Lim SY, Marano MM, Micallef J, Mokaya J, Moukheiber E, Nwabuobi L, Okubadejo N, Pal PK, Shah H, Shalash A, Sherer T, Siddiqui B, Thompson T, Ullrich A, Walker R, Dua T. Six Action Steps to Address Global Disparities in Parkinson Disease: A World Health Organization Priority. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:929-936. [PMID: 35816299 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The Global Burden of Disease study conducted between 1990 and 2016, based on a global study of 195 countries and territories, identified Parkinson disease (PD) as the fastest growing neurological disorder when measured using death and disability. Most people affected by PD live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and experience large inequalities in access to neurological care and essential medicines. This Special Communication describes 6 actions steps that are urgently needed to address global disparities in PD. Observations The adoption by the 73rd World Health Assembly (WHA) of resolution 73.10 to develop an intersectoral global action plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders in consultation with member states was the stimulus to coordinate efforts and leverage momentum to advance the agenda of neurological conditions, such as PD. In April 2021, the Brain Health Unit at the World Health Organization convened a multidisciplinary, sex-balanced, international consultation workshop, which identified 6 workable avenues for action within the domains of disease burden; advocacy and awareness; prevention and risk reduction; diagnosis, treatment, and care; caregiver support; and research. Conclusions and Relevance The dramatic increase of PD cases in many world regions and the potential costs of PD-associated treatment will need to be addressed to prevent possible health service strain. Across the board, governments, multilateral agencies, donors, public health organizations, and health care professionals constitute potential stakeholders who are urged to make this a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoline Schiess
- Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rodrigo Cataldi
- Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville.,Associate Editor, JAMA Neurology
| | | | | | - Bastiaan R Bloem
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Barretto
- Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society, Mumbai, India
| | - Roongroj Bhidayasiri
- Chulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.,The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Richard Brown
- Chemical Safety and Health Unit, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Neerja Chowdhary
- Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Max Coslov
- Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Esther Cubo
- Hospital Universitario Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Victor S C Fung
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Oscar S Gershanik
- Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Larry Gifford
- Person With Parkinsons, PD Avengers, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joyce Gordon
- Neurological Health Charities Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanan Khalil
- College of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sara Lew
- Malaysian Parkinson's Disease Association, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Shen-Yang Lim
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,The Mah Pooi Soo and Tan Chin Nam Centre for Parkinson's and Related Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | - Emile Moukheiber
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lynda Nwabuobi
- Weill Cornell Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Institute, New York, New York
| | | | - Pramod Kumar Pal
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India
| | - Hiral Shah
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ali Shalash
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Todd Sherer
- The Michael J. Fox Foundation, New York, New York
| | | | - Ted Thompson
- The Michael J. Fox Foundation, New York, New York
| | - Andreas Ullrich
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard Walker
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Tarun Dua
- Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lian OS, Nettleton S, Grange H, Dowrick C. "I'm not the doctor; I'm just the patient": Patient agency and shared decision-making in naturally occurring primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:1996-2004. [PMID: 34887159 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore interactional processes in which clinical decisions are made in situ during medical consultations, particularly the ways in which patients show agency in decision-making processes by proposing and opposing actions, and which normative dimensions and role-expectations their engagement entail. METHODS Narrative analysis of verbatim transcripts of 22 naturally occurring consultations, sourced from a corpus of 212 consultations between general practitioners and patients in England. After thematically coding the whole dataset, we selected 22 consultations with particularly engaged patients for in-depth analysis. RESULTS Patients oppose further actions more often than they propose actions, and they oppose more directly than they propose. When they explain why they propose and oppose something, they reveal their values. Patients' role-performance changes throughout the consultations. CONCLUSION Assertive patients claim - and probably also achieve - most influence when they oppose actions directly and elaborate why. Patients display ambiguous role-expectations. In final concluding stages of decision-making processes, patients usually defer to GPs' authority. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians should be attentive to the ways in which patients want to engage in decision-making throughout the whole consultation, with awareness of normative dimensions of both process and content, and the ways in which patient's actions are constrained by their institutional position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaug S Lian
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | | | - Huw Grange
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mogan C, Harrison Dening K, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. Health and social care services for people with dementia at home at the end of life: A qualitative study of bereaved informal caregivers' experiences. Palliat Med 2022; 36:976-985. [PMID: 35466787 PMCID: PMC9174574 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221092624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More people are dying at home with dementia and Alzheimer's disease. While informal caregivers are the main providers of care for people with dementia dying at home, they require support from health and social care services. However, little is known about how they experience these services. AIM To explore informal caregivers' views and experiences of health and social care services when looking after a person with dementia at home at the end-of-life. DESIGN A qualitative interview study. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Twenty-nine bereaved informal caregivers who had looked after a person with dementia at home during the last 6 months of life. RESULTS Specialist palliative care for people with dementia dying at home is rare and care is mostly managed by General Practitioners and domiciliary care workers. Four overarching themes were identified: Poor continuity of care; Lack of expertise; Limited advance care planning; and Loss of autonomy. CONCLUSIONS End-of-life care at home for people with dementia must be proactively planned with an emphasis on advance care planning. Policy makers should recognise the critical role of domiciliary care services in end-of-life care and ensure that they are adequately qualified and trained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Mogan
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Christopher Dowrick
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee YY, Mihalopoulos C, Chatterton ML, Fletcher SL, Chondros P, Densley K, Murray E, Dowrick C, Coe A, Hegarty KL, Davidson SK, Wachtler C, Palmer VJ, Gunn JM. Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268948. [PMID: 35613149 PMCID: PMC9132336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
Methods and findings
A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months.
Conclusions
Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Yi Lee
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan L. Fletcher
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Patty Chondros
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Konstancja Densley
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Coe
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Kelsey L. Hegarty
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra K. Davidson
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Caroline Wachtler
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Victoria J. Palmer
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Jane M. Gunn
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Herrman H, Patel V, Kieling C, Berk M, Buchweitz C, Cuijpers P, Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Kohrt BA, Maj M, McGorry P, Reynolds CF, Weissman MM, Chibanda D, Dowrick C, Howard LM, Hoven CW, Knapp M, Mayberg HS, Penninx BWJH, Xiao S, Trivedi M, Uher R, Vijayakumar L, Wolpert M. Time for united action on depression: a Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet 2022; 399:957-1022. [PMID: 35180424 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Herrman
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Sangath, Goa, India; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian Kieling
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Institute, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Claudia Buchweitz
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Toshiaki A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania L Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Patrick McGorry
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Charles F Reynolds
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Myrna M Weissman
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dixon Chibanda
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe; Centre for Global Mental Health, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Louise M Howard
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christina W Hoven
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shuiyuan Xiao
- Central South University Xiangya School of Public Health, Changsha, China
| | - Madhukar Trivedi
- Peter O'Donnell Jr Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rudolf Uher
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lakshmi Vijayakumar
- Sneha, Suicide Prevention Centre and Voluntary Health Services, Chennai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Benson J, Sexton R, Dowrick C, Gibson C, Lionis C, Ferreira Veloso Gomes J, Bakola M, AlKhathami A, Nazeer S, Igoumenaki A, Usta J, Arroll B, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Allen C. Staying psychologically safe as a doctor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fam Med Community Health 2022; 10:fmch-2021-001553. [PMID: 35045988 PMCID: PMC8771807 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Benson
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide School of Medicine, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia .,Prideaux Centre for Health Professionals Education, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Roger Sexton
- Doctors Health SA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Christine Gibson
- Department of Family Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christos Lionis
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Maria Bakola
- Research Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, University of Ioannina Faculty of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Abdullah AlKhathami
- Innovative Primary Mental Health Program, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shimnaz Nazeer
- Family Medicine in Clinical Medicine Department, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - Alkisti Igoumenaki
- University Clinic, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Jinan Usta
- Family Medicine Department, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bruce Arroll
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Claudia Allen
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arroll B, Roskvist R, Moir F, Walsh E, Louis D, Buttrick L, Khalil N, Mount V, Dowrick C. The first consultation with a depressed patient: A qualitative study of GPs' approaches to diagnosis. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11:3934-3942. [DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1303_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
20
|
Moir F, Roskvist R, Arroll B, Louis D, Walsh E, Buttrick L, Khalil N, Mount V, Dowrick C. Treatment of depression in the first primary care consultation: A qualitative study. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11:2597-2602. [PMID: 36119184 PMCID: PMC9480761 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1904_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The first primary care consultation for patients with depression can have long-term consequences for patients, but little is known about treatment decisions at this visit. The aim of this study was to explore the treatment of patients presenting in primary care with a new episode of depression and the drivers behind GPs’ treatment decisions at the initial consultation. Materials and Methods: A random sample of GPs in Auckland was invited to participate. A qualitative study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Results: Twenty-one GPs were interviewed. We identified three themes as drivers of treatment decisions at the first visit: characteristics of GPs, characteristics of patients, and characteristics of treatment options. Drivers for prescribing were severe depression and time constraints. A driver for non-pharmacological treatment was a strong doctor–patient relationship. Limited time, skill, and training were associated with low confidence using talking therapies. Access to counseling was reported as poor. There was a very wide range of approaches taken. GPs described preferring antidepressants less and talking therapies more with Māori patients. Behavioral activation was used least despite its ease of use and it being one of the most effective treatments for depression. Conclusion: Treatment of depression at the first visit varies widely between practitioners. GPs report multiple barriers to the provision of talking therapies. A move to a more standardized approach may lead to more equitable care. This is the first study to report findings about the initial primary care consultation for depression.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lunt C, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. What is the impact of day care on older people with long-term conditions: A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 2021; 29:1201-1221. [PMID: 33332714 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
There is a lack of robust evidence regarding outcomes for day care use among older people living with long-term conditions (LTCs). Day care is provided by independent, private and voluntary and charitable sectors. This systematic review aims to establish current evidence of outcomes for older people with LTCs attending day care services and outcomes on carers, across all service models. Narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data was undertaken. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was carried out across eight electronic databases and reference lists of key journals between 2004 and October 2020 were searched. Searches returned 1,202 unique titles. Forty-five articles from 16 countries met the criteria on review of title, abstract and full article. There is limited evidence suggesting improved levels of perceived psychological health, quality of life, perceived general health, physical health and functioning for older people attending day care who have LTCs. The respite function of day care resulted in positive outcomes for carers. Studies evaluating outcomes for participants or carers were limited in quantity and quality. There is limited information regarding outcomes for day care attendance for older people with multiple LTCs from existing literature. Further research focusing on LTCs and day care attendance would benefit this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Lunt
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), Institute of Psychology Health and Society Block B Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), University of Liverpool / Honorary Consultant Liverpool CCG (Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bowers H, Kendrick T, van Ginneken N, Glowacka M, Williams S, Leydon GM, May C, Dowrick C, Moncrieff J, Johnson CF, Moore M, Laine R, Geraghty AWA. A Digital Intervention for Primary Care Practitioners to Support Antidepressant Discontinuation (Advisor for Health Professionals): Development Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25537. [PMID: 34269688 PMCID: PMC8325079 DOI: 10.2196/25537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of people receiving antidepressants has increased in the past 3 decades, mainly because of people staying on them longer. However, in many cases long-term treatment is not evidence based and risks increasing side effects. Additionally, prompting general practitioners (GPs) to review medication does not improve the rate of appropriate discontinuation. Therefore, GPs and other health professionals may need help to support patients discontinuing antidepressants in primary care. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop a digital intervention to support practitioners in helping patients discontinue inappropriate long-term antidepressants (as part of a wider intervention package including a patient digital intervention and patient telephone support). METHODS A prototype digital intervention called Advisor for Health Professionals (ADvisor HP) was planned and developed using theory, evidence, and a person-based approach. The following elements informed development: a literature review and qualitative synthesis, an in-depth qualitative study, the development of guiding principles for design elements, and theoretical behavioral analyses. The intervention was then optimized through think-aloud qualitative interviews with health professionals while they were using the prototype intervention. RESULTS Think-aloud qualitative interviews with 19 health professionals suggested that the digital intervention contained useful information and was readily accessible to practitioners. The development work highlighted a need for further guidance on drug tapering schedules for practitioners and clarity about who is responsible for broaching the subject of discontinuation. Practitioners highlighted the need to have information in easily and quickly accessible formats because of time constraints in day-to-day practice. Some GPs felt that some information was already known to them but understood why this was included. Practitioners differed in their ideas about how they would use ADvisor HP in practice, with some preferring to read the resource in its entirety and others wanting to dip in and out as needed. Changes were made to the wording and structure of the intervention in response to the feedback provided. CONCLUSIONS ADvisor HP is a digital intervention that has been developed using theory, evidence, and a person-based approach. The optimization work suggests that practitioners may find this tool to be useful in supporting the reduction of long-term antidepressant use. Further quantitative and qualitative evaluation through a randomized controlled trial is needed to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Bowers
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nadja van Ginneken
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marta Glowacka
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Williams
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Geraldine M Leydon
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Carl May
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Moncrieff
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris F Johnson
- Pharmacy & Prescribing Support Unit, Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Laine
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lunt C, Shiels C, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. Outcomes for older people with long-term conditions attending day care services delivered by paid staff or volunteers: a comparative study. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2021; 15:26323524211030283. [PMID: 34291206 PMCID: PMC8274090 DOI: 10.1177/26323524211030283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Day care services support older people living with long-term conditions (LTC’s). Aims: The aims of the study were to determine outcomes in terms of loneliness and health-related quality of life for older people with LTCs attending day care services in the United Kingdom. Methods: Newly referred older people with LTCs to day care services in North West of England and Wales were invited to participate. The EQ-5D-3L and De Jong Loneliness questionnaires were completed at recruitment, 6 and 12 weeks. Results: Ninty-four older people (64% female), age range 65–99 years; mean number of LTCs 4.3 (range: 2–9) were recruited. About 52% lived alone and 36% lived in one of the 20% most deprived local authorities in England and Wales. Outcomes over 12 weeks were comparable for paid, blended, and for volunteer-led services. Conclusion: Following the Covid-19 pandemic, it is increasingly urgent to support older people with LTCs who may have lost physical and cognitive function during lockdown and to support their recovery. Our study suggests that volunteers can provide services and complement the care provided by paid staff, freeing up resources and enabling increasing numbers of older people to be supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Lunt
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group and Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chris Shiels
- Statistician, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Primary Care, Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- Professor of Palliative Medicine, Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group and Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lynch JM, Dowrick C, Meredith P, McGregor SLT, van Driel M. Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:638-647. [PMID: 32939937 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transdisciplinary research and generalist practice both face the task of integrating and discerning the value of knowledge across disciplinary and sectoral knowledge cultures. Transdisciplinarity and generalism also both offer philosophical and practical insights into the epistemology, ontology, axiology, and logic of seeing the 'whole'. Although generalism is a skill that can be used in many settings from industry to education, the focus of this paper is the literature of the primary care setting (i.e., general practice or family medicine). Generalist philosophy and practice in the family medicine setting highly values whole person care that uses integrative and interpretive wisdom to include both biomedical and biographical forms of knowledge. Generalist researchers are often caught between reductionist (positivist) biomedical measures and social science (post-positivist) constructivist theories of knowing. Neither of these approaches, even when juxtaposed in mixed-methods research, approximate the complexity of the generalist clinical encounter. A theoretically robust research methodology is needed that acknowledges the complexity of interpreting these ways of knowing in research and clinical practice. METHODS A conceptual review of literature to define the alignment between (a) the philosophy and practice of generalism in primary care and (b) both the practical (Zurich) and philosophical or methodological (Nicolescuian) schools of transdisciplinarity. RESULTS The alignment between generalism and transdisciplinarity included their broad scope, relational process, complex knowledge management, humble attitude to knowing, and real-world outcome focus. CONCLUSION The concurrence between these approaches to knowing is offered here as Transdisciplinary Generalism - a coherent epistemology for both primary care researchers and generalist clinicians to understand, enact, and research their own sophisticated craft of managing diverse forms of knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M Lynch
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Integrate Place, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Pamela Meredith
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Mieke van Driel
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lian OS, Nettleton S, Wifstad Å, Dowrick C. Modes of Interaction in Naturally Occurring Medical Encounters With General Practitioners: The "One in a Million" Study. Qual Health Res 2021; 31:1129-1143. [PMID: 33660573 PMCID: PMC8114434 DOI: 10.1177/1049732321993790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we qualitatively explore the manner and style in which medical encounters between patients and general practitioners (GPs) are mutually conducted, as exhibited in situ in 10 consultations sourced from the One in a Million: Primary Care Consultations Archive in England. Our main objectives are to identify interactional modes, to develop a classification of these modes, and to uncover how modes emerge and shift both within and between consultations. Deploying an interactional perspective and a thematic and narrative analysis of consultation transcripts, we identified five distinctive interactional modes: question and answer (Q&A) mode, lecture mode, probabilistic mode, competition mode, and narrative mode. Most modes are GP-led. Mode shifts within consultations generally map on to the chronology of the medical encounter. Patient-led narrative modes are initiated by patients themselves, which demonstrates agency. Our classification of modes derives from complete naturally occurring consultations, covering a wide range of symptoms, and may have general applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaug S. Lian
- University of Tromsø–The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Åge Wifstad
- University of Tromsø–The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hobbs C, Lewis G, Dowrick C, Kounali D, Peters TJ, Lewis G. Comparison between self-administered depression questionnaires and patients' own views of changes in their mood: a prospective cohort study in primary care. Psychol Med 2021; 51:853-860. [PMID: 31957623 PMCID: PMC8108392 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291719003878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-administered questionnaires are widely used in primary care and other clinical settings to assess the severity of depressive symptoms and monitor treatment outcomes. Qualitative studies have found that changes in questionnaire scores might not fully capture patients' experience of changes in their mood but there are no quantitative studies of this issue. We examined the extent to which changes in scores from depression questionnaires disagreed with primary care patients' perceptions of changes in their mood and investigated factors influencing this relationship. METHODS Prospective cohort study assessing patients on four occasions, 2 weeks apart. Patients (N = 554) were recruited from primary care surgeries in three UK sites (Bristol, Liverpool and York) and had reported depressive symptoms or low mood in the past year [68% female, mean age 48.3 (s.d. 12.6)]. Main outcome measures were changes in scores on patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and beck depression inventory (BDI-II) and the patients' own ratings of change. RESULTS There was marked disagreement between clinically important changes in questionnaire scores and patient-rated change, with disagreement of 51% (95% CI 46-55%) on PHQ-9 and 55% (95% CI 51-60%) on BDI-II. Patients with more severe anxiety were less likely, and those with better mental and physical health-related quality of life were more likely, to report feeling better, having controlled for depression scores. CONCLUSIONS Our results illustrate the limitations of self-reported depression scales to assess clinical change. Clinicians should be cautious in interpreting changes in questionnaire scores without further clinical assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Hobbs
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, BathBA2 7AY, UK
| | - Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building Block B, LiverpoolL69 3BX, UK
| | - Daphne Kounali
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, BristolBS8 2BN, UK
| | - Tim J. Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, First Floor, Learning and Research, Southmead Hospital, BristolBS10 5NB, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van der Boor CF, Amos R, Nevitt S, Dowrick C, White RG. Systematic review of factors associated with quality of life of asylum seekers and refugees in high-income countries. Confl Health 2020; 14:48. [PMID: 32699551 PMCID: PMC7370437 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00292-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The stressful experiences that many asylum seekers and refugees (AS&R) are exposed to during forced migration, and during resettlement in host countries, can have a profound impact on their mental health. Comparatively less research attention has been allocated to exploring other indices of quality of life (QoL) in AS&R populations. This review aimed to (i) synthesize the predictors and correlates of QoL of AS&R populations in high-income countries, and (ii) to identify the methodological strengths and weaknesses of this body of research. Fourteen databases were systematically searched (Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment, National Health Service Economic Evaluation, Educational Resource Index and Abstracts, BiblioMap, Scopus, Social Sciences Citation Index, Evidence Aid, DARE, Web of Science and PubMed). Eligibility criteria included: adults seeking asylum or refuge in a high-income country, primary quantitative data, the use of a measure based on the WHO's definition of QoL, published in a peer-reviewed journal. A narrative synthesis approach was used, and the quality was assessed using the AXIS tool for cross-sectional studies and the CASP tool for longitudinal studies. Of the 13.656 papers identified, 23 met the eligibility criteria. A wide range of factors were found to have significant associations with QoL. Both positive and negative correlates of QoL were largely dominated by social (e.g. social networks) and mental health factors (e.g. depression). Although all of the cross-sectional studies met over half of the quality criteria, only 12 met 75% or more of these criteria. For the longitudinal studies, for all but one study lacked statistical precision and the results cannot be applied to the local population. Key findings across the various forms of QoL (overall, physical, psychological, social and environmental) were that having established social networks and social integration were associated with higher QoL, whereas having mental disorders (i.e. PTSD or depression) was strongly associated with reduced QoL. More research is needed into physical and environmental predictors and correlates of QoL. The findings of the review can be used to inform policies and interventions aimed at supporting AS&R and promoting the integration and wellbeing of these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina F van der Boor
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK
| | - Rebekah Amos
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK
| | - Sarah Nevitt
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK
| | - Ross G White
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK.,University of Liverpool, G.10, Ground floor, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ng RMK, Chan TF, Herrman H, Dowrick C. What do psychiatrists think about primary mental health competencies among family doctors? A WPA-WONCA global survey. BJPsych Int 2020; 18:18-22. [PMID: 34287405 PMCID: PMC8274417 DOI: 10.1192/bji.2020.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
People with common mental disorders often seek medical attention from their family doctors. Thus, it is essential for family doctors to possess primary mental health knowledge. The aim of this study was to understand whether psychiatrists endorse the primary mental health competencies identified by the World Organization of Family Doctors and whether they agree that family doctors are demonstrating these competencies. A questionnaire was constructed based on 32 core competencies. Presidents of all World Psychiatric Association member societies were invited to complete the questionnaire or to forward it to local experts. According to the respondents, these competencies are considered relevant yet not sufficiently possessed by typical primary care doctors. Proposals are made to bridge this assumed competency gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M K Ng
- Secretary for Education, World Psychiatric Association, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - T F Chan
- Resident Trainee, Department of Psychiatry, Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - H Herrman
- President, World Psychiatric Association, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Dowrick
- Chair, Working Party on Mental Health, World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kendrick T, Moore M, Leydon G, Stuart B, Geraghty AWA, Yao G, Lewis G, Griffiths G, May C, Dewar-Haggart R, Williams S, Zhu S, Dowrick C. Patient-reported outcome measures for monitoring primary care patients with depression (PROMDEP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:441. [PMID: 32471492 PMCID: PMC7257549 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04344-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benefits to patients from reduced depression have been shown from monitoring progress with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in psychological therapy and mental health settings. This approach has not yet been researched in the United Kingdom for primary care, which is where most people with depression are treated in the United Kingdom. METHODS This is a parallel-group cluster randomised trial with 1:1 allocation to intervention and control. Patients who are age 18+ years, with a new episode of depressive disorder/symptoms, meet the inclusion criteria. Patients with current depression treatment, comorbid dementia/psychosis/substance misuse/suicidal ideas are excluded. The intervention includes the Administration of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a PROM within 2 weeks of diagnosis and at follow-up 4 weeks later. General practitioners are trained in interpreting scores and asked to take them into account in their treatment decisions. Patients are given written feedback on scores and suggested treatments. The primary outcome measure is Depression on the Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include BDI-II at 26 weeks, changes in drug treatments and referrals, social functioning (Work & Social Adjustment Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D) at 12 and 26 weeks, service use over 26 weeks (modified Client Services Receipt Inventory) to calculate NHS costs, and patient satisfaction at 26 weeks (Medical Informant Satisfaction Scale). The sample includes 676 total participants from 113 practices across three centres. Randomisation is achieved by computerised sequence generation. Blinding is impossible given the nature of the intervention (self-report outcome measures prevent rating bias). Differences at 12 and 26 weeks between intervention and controls in depression, social functioning and quality of life are analysed using linear mixed models, adjusted for socio-demographics, baseline depression, anxiety, and clustering, while including practice as a random effect. Patient satisfaction, quality of life (QALYs) and costs over 26 weeks will be compared between arms. Qualitative process analysis includes interviews with 15-20 GP/NPs and 15-20 patients per arm to reflect trial results and implementation issues, using Normalization Process Theory as a theoretical framework. DISCUSSION If PROMs are helpful in improving patient outcomes for depression even to a small extent, then they are likely to be good value for money, given their low cost. The benefits could be considerable, given that depression is common, disabling, and costly. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN no: 17299295. Registered 1st October 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK.
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, University Road Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Carl May
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Rachel Dewar-Haggart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Samantha Williams
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kendrick T, Geraghty AWA, Bowers H, Stuart B, Leydon G, May C, Yao G, O'Brien W, Glowacka M, Holley S, Williams S, Zhu S, Dewar-Haggart R, Palmer B, Bell M, Collinson S, Fry I, Lewis G, Griffiths G, Gilbody S, Moncrieff J, Moore M, Macleod U, Little P, Dowrick C. REDUCE (Reviewing long-term antidepressant use by careful monitoring in everyday practice) internet and telephone support to people coming off long-term antidepressants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:419. [PMID: 32448374 PMCID: PMC7245840 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04338-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around one in ten adults take antidepressants for depression in England, and their long-term use is increasing. Some need them to prevent relapse, but 30-50% could possibly stop them without relapsing and avoid adverse effects and complications of long-term use. However, stopping is not always easy due to withdrawal symptoms and a fear of relapse of depression. When general practitioners review patients on long-term antidepressants and recommend to those who are suitable to stop the medication, only 6-8% are able to stop. The Reviewing long-term antidepressant use by careful monitoring in everyday practice (REDUCE) research programme aims to identify safe and cost-effective ways of helping patients taking long-term antidepressants taper off treatment when appropriate. METHODS Design: REDUCE is a two-arm, 1:1 parallel group randomised controlled trial, with randomisation clustered by participating family practices. SETTING England and north Wales. POPULATION patients taking antidepressants for longer than 1 year for a first episode of depression or longer than 2 years for repeated episodes of depression who are no longer depressed and want to try to taper off their antidepressant use. INTERVENTION provision of 'ADvisor' internet programmes to general practitioners or nurse practitioners and to patients designed to support antidepressant withdrawal, plus three patient telephone calls from a psychological wellbeing practitioner. The control arm receives usual care. Blinding of patients, practitioners and researchers is not possible in an open pragmatic trial, but statistical and health economic data analysts will remain blind to allocation. OUTCOME MEASURES the primary outcome is self-reported nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire at 6 months for depressive symptoms. SECONDARY OUTCOMES depressive symptoms at other follow-up time points, anxiety, discontinuation of antidepressants, social functioning, wellbeing, enablement, quality of life, satisfaction, and use of health services for costs. SAMPLE SIZE 402 patients (201 intervention and 201 controls) from 134 general practices recruited over 15-18 months, and followed-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A qualitative process evaluation will be conducted through interviews with 15-20 patients and 15-20 practitioners in each arm to explore why the interventions were effective or not, depending on the results. DISCUSSION Helping patients reduce and stop antidepressants is often challenging for practitioners and time-consuming for very busy primary care practices. If REDUCE provides evidence showing that access to internet and telephone support enables more patients to stop treatment without increasing depression we will try to implement the intervention throughout the National Health Service, publishing practical guidance for professionals and advice for patients to follow, publicised through patient support groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN:12417565. Registered on 7 October 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Hannah Bowers
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Carl May
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Wendy O'Brien
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Marta Glowacka
- Department for Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Simone Holley
- School of Psychology, Building 44 Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Samantha Williams
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Rachel Dewar-Haggart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Bryan Palmer
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Margaret Bell
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Sue Collinson
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Imogen Fry
- School of Psychology, Building 44 Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, York, UK
| | - Joanna Moncrieff
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Una Macleod
- Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rawlinson R, Aslam RW, Burnside G, Chiumento A, Eriksson-Lee M, Humphreys A, Khan N, Lawrence D, McCluskey R, Mackinnon A, Orton L, Rahman A, Roberts E, Rosala-Hallas A, Edwards RT, Uwamaliya P, White RG, Winrow E, Dowrick C. Lay-therapist-delivered, low-intensity, psychosocial intervention for refugees and asylum seekers (PROSPER): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:367. [PMID: 32345352 PMCID: PMC7189505 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04310-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Asylum seekers and refugees (AS&Rs) experience impaired mental health and wellbeing, related to stresses in their country of origin, experiences in transit and reception on arrival, including significant barriers to accessing mainstream services. Their contact with health care is often crisis-driven and mediated through non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Problem Management Plus (PM+) is a psychosocial intervention recommended by the World Health Organisation to address distress experienced by adults affected by humanitarian crises. We are investigating its application for the first time in a high-income country. Methods In a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), PM+ will be delivered to AS&Rs in contact with NGOs in Liverpool City Region, UK by lay therapists who have lived experience of forced migration. Following systematic review and stakeholder engagement, PM+ has been adapted to the local context, and lay therapists have been trained in its delivery. We will assess the feasibility of conducting a three-arm RCT of five 90-min sessions of PM+, delivered individually or in groups by lay therapists to AS&Rs experiencing emotional distress and functional impairment, compared with each other and with usual support offered by local NGOs. Distress and impairment at baseline will be measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS). We aim to recruit 105 participants, 35 per arm. Primary health outcomes are anxiety and depressive symptoms at 3 months, measured by HADS. Secondary outcomes include subjective wellbeing, functional status, progress on identified problems, presence of post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive disorder and service usage. Longer-term impact will be assessed at 6 months post baseline, on the same parameters. We will assess the feasibility of conducting a full RCT in relation to the following elements: recruitment and retention of lay therapists and study participants; fidelity of delivery of PM+; and suitability of the study measures, including any linguistic or cultural barriers. Discussion We will use these findings to specify the parameters for a full RCT to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PM+ in reducing emotional distress and health inequalities, and improving functional ability and wellbeing, amongst asylum seekers and refugees. Trial registration ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN15214107. Registered on 10 September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Rawlinson
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Institute in the Park, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Rabeea'h W Aslam
- PRIME Centre Wales, Health Services Research Team, Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Floor 2, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Girvan Burnside
- Department of Biostatistics, University7 of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Anna Chiumento
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Block B Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Malena Eriksson-Lee
- Refugee Support, British Red Cross, Bradbury House, Tower Street, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4BJ, UK
| | - Amy Humphreys
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Institute in the Park, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Naila Khan
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Block B Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Daniel Lawrence
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Block B Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Rachel McCluskey
- Person Shaped Support, Eleanor Rathbone House, Connect Business Village, 24 Derby Road, Liverpool, L5 9PR, UK
| | - Annette Mackinnon
- Person Shaped Support, Eleanor Rathbone House, Connect Business Village, 24 Derby Road, Liverpool, L5 9PR, UK
| | - Lois Orton
- Department of Public Health and Policy, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Block B Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Ewan Roberts
- Asylum Link Merseyside, St Anne's Centre, 7 Overbury Street, Liverpool, L7 3HJ, UK
| | - Anna Rosala-Hallas
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy Hall, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Philomene Uwamaliya
- School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Building, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ETP, UK
| | - Ross G White
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, G10 Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Eira Winrow
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy Hall, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Block B Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kelly BD, Casey P, Dunn G, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Dowrick C. The role of personality disorder in ‘difficult to reach’ patients with depression: Findings from the ODIN study. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 22:153-9. [PMID: 17127039 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2006] [Revised: 07/03/2006] [Accepted: 07/05/2006] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractIndividuals with personality disorders (especially paranoid personality disorder) tend to be reluctant to engage in treatment. This paper aimed to elucidate the role of personality disorder in predicting engagement with psychological treatment for depression. The Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) involves six urban and three rural study sites throughout Europe at which cases of depression were identified through a two-stage community survey. One patient in seven who was offered psychological treatment for depression had a comorbid diagnosis of personality disorder (most commonly paranoid personality disorder). Forty-five percent of patients who were offered psychological treatment for depression did not complete treatment. The odds of completion were higher for patients with a comorbid diagnosis of personality disorder, especially paranoid, anxious or dependent personality disorder. The relatively low number of cases with some specific personality disorders (e.g. schizoid personality disorder) limited the study's power to reach conclusions about these specific disorders. This study focused on a community-based sample which may lead to apparently lower rates of engagement when compared to studies based on treatment-seeking populations. Episodes of depression in the context of personality disorder may represent a valuable opportunity to engage with patients who might otherwise resist engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan D Kelly
- Department of Adult, Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 62/63 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Davidson SK, Romaniuk H, Chondros P, Dowrick C, Pirkis J, Herrman H, Fletcher S, Gunn J. Antidepressant treatment for primary care patients with depressive symptoms: Data from the diamond longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2020; 54:367-381. [PMID: 31957463 DOI: 10.1177/0004867419898761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In light of emerging evidence questioning the safety of antidepressants, it is timely to investigate the appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing. This study estimated the prevalence of possible over- and under-treatment with antidepressants among primary care attendees and investigated the factors associated with potentially inappropriate antidepressant use. METHODS In all, 789 adult primary care patients with depressive symptoms were recruited from 30 general practices in Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and followed up every 3 months in 2006 and annually from 2007 to 2011. For this study, we first assessed appropriateness of antidepressant use in 2007 at the 2-year follow-up to enable history of depression to be taken into account, providing 574 (73%) patients with five yearly assessments, resulting in a total of 2870 assessments. We estimated the prevalence of use of antidepressants according to the adapted National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines and used regression analysis to identify factors associated with possible over- and under-treatment. RESULTS In 41% (243/586) of assessments where antidepressants were indicated according to adapted National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, patients reported not taking them. Conversely in a third (557/1711) of assessments where guideline criteria were unlikely to be met, participants reported antidepressant use. Being female and chronic physical illness were associated with antidepressant use where guideline criteria were not met, but no factors were associated with not taking antidepressants where guideline criteria were met. CONCLUSIONS Much antidepressant treatment in general practice is for people with minimal or mild symptoms, while people with moderate or severe depressive symptoms may miss out. There is considerable scope for improving depression care through better allocation of antidepressant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra K Davidson
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena Romaniuk
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.,Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Patty Chondros
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Herrman
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Fletcher
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Read J, Renton J, Harrop C, Geekie J, Dowrick C. A survey of UK general practitioners about depression, antidepressants and withdrawal: implementing the 2019 Public Health England report. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2020; 10:2045125320950124. [PMID: 32922735 PMCID: PMC7457636 DOI: 10.1177/2045125320950124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, a literature review indicated that more than half of people who try to come off antidepressants experience withdrawal effects. Both the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and the Royal College of Psychiatrists updated their positions in line with that review, and Public Health England published a 152-page report called Dependence and withdrawal associated with some prescribed medicines: an evidence review. The report made several recommendations relevant to general practice. METHOD In order to facilitate implementation of these recommendations, an online survey was designed to explore United Kingdom general practitioner (GP) experiences, opinions, knowledge and needs in relation to depression, ADs and withdrawal. A total of 66 GPs had completed the survey when COVID-19 occurred. RESULTS In keeping with previous findings, this small sample of GPs had a predominantly psycho-social perspective on the causes of, and treatments for, depression. They broadly considered ADs effective for moderate/severe depression and ineffective for minimal/mild depression, for which they preferred psychological therapies and social prescribing. There was a marked lack of consistency in GPs' knowledge about the incidence and duration of withdrawal effects. Only a minority (29%) felt their knowledge about withdrawal was 'adequate' and fewer (17%) believed this about their 'Ability to distinguish between withdrawal effects and return of the original problem (e.g. depression)'. Two-thirds (68%) would like more training on these matters. CONCLUSION It is hoped that even this small sample will be helpful when designing, and seeking funding for, GP training programmes, and when implementing the PHE recommendations for support services, based in the primary care system, for the millions of people contemplating or initiating withdrawal from ADs every year in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Read
- School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
| | | | | | - Jim Geekie
- NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK NHS Lothian, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Duffy L, Lewis G, Ades A, Araya R, Bone J, Brabyn S, Button K, Churchill R, Croudace T, Derrick C, Dixon P, Dowrick C, Fawsitt C, Fusco L, Gilbody S, Harmer C, Hobbs C, Hollingworth W, Jones V, Kendrick T, Kessler D, Khan N, Kounali D, Lanham P, Malpass A, Munafo M, Pervin J, Peters T, Riozzie D, Robinson J, Salaminios G, Sharp D, Thom H, Thomas L, Welton N, Wiles N, Woodhouse R, Lewis G. Antidepressant treatment with sertraline for adults with depressive symptoms in primary care: the PANDA research programme including RCT. Programme Grants Appl Res 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar07100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Despite a growing number of prescriptions for antidepressants (over 70 million in 2018), there is uncertainty about when people with depression might benefit from antidepressant medication and concern that antidepressants are prescribed unnecessarily.
Objectives
The main objective of the PANDA (What are the indications for Prescribing ANtiDepressAnts that will lead to a clinical benefit?) research programme was to provide more guidance about when antidepressants are likely to benefit people with depression. We aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important difference for commonly used self-administered scales for depression and anxiety, and to understand more about how patients respond to such assessments. We carried out an observational study of patients with depressive symptoms and a placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial of sertraline versus placebo to estimate the treatment effect in UK primary care. The hypothesis was that the severity and duration of symptoms were related to treatment response.
Design
The programme consisted of three phases. The first phase relied on the secondary analysis of existing data extracted from published trials. The second phase was the PANDA cohort study of patients with depressive symptoms who presented to primary care and were followed up 2, 4 and 6 weeks after a baseline assessment. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the analysis. The third phase was a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial of sertraline versus placebo in patients presenting to primary care with depressive symptoms.
Setting
UK primary care in Bristol, London, Liverpool and York.
Participants
Patients aged 18–74 years who were experiencing depressive symptoms in primary care. Eligibility for the PANDA randomised controlled trial included that there was uncertainty about the benefits about treatment with an antidepressant.
Interventions
In the PANDA randomised controlled trial, patients were individually randomised to 100 mg daily of sertraline or an identical placebo. The PANDA cohort study was an observational study.
Main outcome measures
Depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire were the primary outcome for the randomised controlled trial. Other outcomes included anxiety symptoms using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory, version 2; health-related quality of life; self-reported improvement; and cost-effectiveness.
Results
The secondary analysis of existing randomised controlled trials [GENetic and clinical Predictors Of treatment response in Depression (GenPod), TREAting Depression with physical activity (TREAD) and Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive Behavioural Therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in primary care (CoBalT)] found evidence that the minimal clinically important difference increased as the initial severity of depressive symptoms rose. Our estimates of minimal clinically important difference were a 17% and 18% reduction in Beck Depression Inventory scores for GenPod and TREAD, respectively. In CoBalT, a 32% reduction corresponded to the minimal clinically important difference but the participants in this study had depression that had not responded to antidepressants. In the PANDA study cohort, and from our analyses in existing data, we found that the minimal clinically important difference varies considerably with the initial severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms. Expressing the minimal clinically important difference as a percentage reduction reduces this variation at higher scores, but at low scores the percentage reduction increased substantially. The results from the qualitative studies pointed out many limitations of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items in assessing change and recovery from depression. In the PANDA randomised controlled trial, there was no evidence that sertraline resulted in a reduction in depressive symptoms within 6 weeks of randomisation, but there was some evidence of a reduction by 12 weeks. However, sertraline led to a reduction in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of mental health-related quality of life and an increased likelihood of reporting improvement. The mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items score at 6 weeks was 7.98 (standard deviation 5.63) in the sertraline group and 8.76 (standard deviation 5.86) in the placebo group (5% relative reduction, 95% confidence interval –7% to 15%; p = 0.41). Of the secondary outcomes, there was strong evidence that sertraline reduced anxiety symptoms (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 score reduced by 17% (95% confidence interval 9% to 25%; p = 0.00005). Sertraline had a high probability (> 90%) of being cost-effective at 12 weeks. The PANDA randomised controlled trial found no evidence that treatment response or cost-effectiveness was related to severity or duration of depressive symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference estimates suggested that sertraline’s effect on anxiety, but not on depression, was likely to be clinically important.
Limitations
The results from the randomised controlled trial and the estimates of minimal clinically important difference were not sufficiently precise to provide specific clinical guidance for individuals. We had low power in testing whether or not initial severity and duration of depressive symptoms are related to treatment response.
Conclusions
The results of the trial support the use of sertraline and probably other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors because of their action in reducing anxiety symptoms and the likelihood of longer-term benefit on depressive symptoms. Sertraline could be prescribed for anxiety symptoms that commonly occur with depression and many patients will experience a clinical benefit. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items and similar self-administered scales should not be used on their own to assess clinical outcome, but should be supplemented with further clinical assessment.
Future work
We need to examine the longer-term effects of antidepressant treatment. We need more precise estimates of the treatment effects and minimal clinically important difference at different severities to provide more specific guidance for individuals. However, the methods we have developed provide an approach towards providing such detailed guidance.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84544741 and EudraCT number 2013-003440-22.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 7, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Ades
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica Bone
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Rachel Churchill
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Croudace
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Padraig Dixon
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Louise Fusco
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Vivien Jones
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Naila Khan
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daphne Kounali
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Patient and public involvement contributor, UK
| | - Alice Malpass
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Marcus Munafo
- Department of Psychology and Integrated Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jodi Pervin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jude Robinson
- Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Debbie Sharp
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Howard Thom
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Thomas
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicky Welton
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We give an overview of recent developments on psychological treatments of depression in primary care. RECENT FINDINGS In recent years, it has become clear that psychotherapies can effectively be delivered through e-health applications. Furthermore, several studies in low and middle income countries have shown that lay health counselors can effectively deliver psychological therapies. Behavioral activation, a relatively simple form of therapy, has been found to be as effective as cognitive behavior therapy. Treatment of subthreshold depression has been found to not only reduce depressive symptoms but also prevent the onset of major depression. In addition, therapies are effective in older adults, patients with general medical disorders and in perinatal depression. Psychological therapies are effective in the treatment of depression in primary care, have longer lasting effects than drugs, are preferred by the majority of patients, and can be applied flexibly with different formats and across different target groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7-9, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Soledad Quero
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bruce Arroll
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lewis G, Duffy L, Ades A, Amos R, Araya R, Brabyn S, Button KS, Churchill R, Derrick C, Dowrick C, Gilbody S, Fawsitt C, Hollingworth W, Jones V, Kendrick T, Kessler D, Kounali D, Khan N, Lanham P, Pervin J, Peters TJ, Riozzie D, Salaminios G, Thomas L, Welton NJ, Wiles N, Woodhouse R, Lewis G. The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration (PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:903-914. [PMID: 31543474 PMCID: PMC7029306 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30366-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is usually managed in primary care, but most antidepressant trials are of patients from secondary care mental health services, with eligibility criteria based on diagnosis and severity of depressive symptoms. Antidepressants are now used in a much wider group of people than in previous regulatory trials. We investigated the clinical effectiveness of sertraline in patients in primary care with depressive symptoms ranging from mild to severe and tested the role of severity and duration in treatment response. METHODS The PANDA study was a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of patients from 179 primary care surgeries in four UK cities (Bristol, Liverpool, London, and York). We included patients aged 18 to 74 years who had depressive symptoms of any severity or duration in the past 2 years, where there was clinical uncertainty about the benefit of an antidepressant. This strategy was designed to improve the generalisability of our sample to current use of antidepressants within primary care. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a remote computer-generated code to sertraline or placebo, and were stratified by severity, duration, and site with random block length. Patients received one capsule (sertraline 50 mg or placebo orally) daily for one week then two capsules daily for up to 11 weeks, consistent with evidence on optimal dosages for efficacy and acceptability. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms 6 weeks after randomisation, measured by Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-item version (PHQ-9) scores. Secondary outcomes at 2, 6 and 12 weeks were depressive symptoms and remission (PHQ-9 and Beck Depression Inventory-II), generalised anxiety symptoms (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment 7-item version), mental and physical health-related quality of life (12-item Short-Form Health Survey), and self-reported improvement. All analyses compared groups as randomised (intention-to-treat). The study is registered with EudraCT, 2013-003440-22 (protocol number 13/0413; version 6.1) and ISRCTN, ISRCTN84544741, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2015, and Aug 31, 2017, we recruited and randomly assigned 655 patients-326 (50%) to sertraline and 329 (50%) to placebo. Two patients in the sertraline group did not complete a substantial proportion of the baseline assessment and were excluded, leaving 653 patients in total. Due to attrition, primary outcome analyses were of 550 patients (266 in the sertraline group and 284 in the placebo group; 85% follow-up that did not differ by treatment allocation). We found no evidence that sertraline led to a clinically meaningful reduction in depressive symptoms at 6 weeks. The mean 6-week PHQ-9 score was 7·98 (SD 5·63) in the sertraline group and 8·76 (5·86) in the placebo group (adjusted proportional difference 0·95, 95% CI 0·85-1·07; p=0·41). However, for secondary outcomes, we found evidence that sertraline led to reduced anxiety symptoms, better mental (but not physical) health-related quality of life, and self-reported improvements in mental health. We observed weak evidence that depressive symptoms were reduced by sertraline at 12 weeks. We recorded seven adverse events-four for sertraline and three for placebo, and adverse events did not differ by treatment allocation. Three adverse events were classified as serious-two in the sertraline group and one in the placebo group. One serious adverse event in the sertraline group was classified as possibly related to study medication. INTERPRETATION Sertraline is unlikely to reduce depressive symptoms within 6 weeks in primary care but we observed improvements in anxiety, quality of life, and self-rated mental health, which are likely to be clinically important. Our findings support the prescription of SSRI antidepressants in a wider group of participants than previously thought, including those with mild to moderate symptoms who do not meet diagnostic criteria for depression or generalised anxiety disorder. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Ades
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebekah Amos
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Vivien Jones
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daphne Kounali
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Naila Khan
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; Department of Liberal Arts, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Jodi Pervin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Derek Riozzie
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Laura Thomas
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jirovsky E, Hoffmann K, Mayrhuber EAS, Mechili EA, Angelaki A, Sifaki-Pistolla D, Petelos E, van den Muijsenbergh M, van Loenen T, Dückers M, Kolozsvári LR, Rurik I, Rotar Pavlič D, Sandoval DC, Borgioli G, Pinilla MJC, Ajduković D, De Graaf P, van Ginneken N, Dowrick C, Lionis C. Development and evaluation of a web-based capacity building course in the EUR-HUMAN project to support primary health care professionals in the provision of high-quality care for refugees and migrants. Glob Health Action 2019; 11:1547080. [PMID: 30499386 PMCID: PMC6282415 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1547080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ongoing refugee crisis has revealed the need for enhancing primary health care (PHC) professionals' skills and training. OBJECTIVES The aim was to strengthen PHC professionals in European countries in the provision of high-quality care for refugees and migrants by offering a concise modular training that was based on the needs of the refugees and PHC professionals as shown by prior research in the EUR-HUMAN project. METHODS We developed, piloted, and evaluated an online capacity building course of 8 stand-alone modules containing information about acute health issues of refugees, legal issues, provider-patient communication and cultural aspects of health and illness, mental health, sexual and reproductive health, child health, chronic diseases, health promotion, and prevention. The English course template was translated into seven languages and adapted to the local contexts of six countries. Pre- and post-completion knowledge tests were administered to effectively assess the progress and knowledge increase of participants so as to issue CME certificates. An online evaluation survey post completion was used to assess the acceptability and practicability of the course from the participant perspective. These data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS A total of 390 participants registered for the online course in 6 countries with 175 completing all modules of the course, 47.7 % of them medical doctors. The mean time for completion was 10.77 hours. In total, 123 participants completed the online evaluation survey; the modules on acute health needs, legal issues (both 44.1%), and provider-patient communication/cultural issues (52.9%) were found particularly important for the daily practice. A majority expressed a will to promote the online course among their peers. CONCLUSION This course is a promising learning tool for PHC professionals and when relevant supportive conditions are met. The course has the potential to empower PHC professionals in their work with refugees and other migrants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Jirovsky
- a Department of General Practice and Family Medicine , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- a Department of General Practice and Family Medicine , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | | | - Enkeleint Aggelos Mechili
- b Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | - Agapi Angelaki
- b Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | - Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla
- b Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | - Elena Petelos
- b Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- c Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijemegen , The Netherlands
| | - Tessa van Loenen
- c Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijemegen , The Netherlands
| | | | - László Róbert Kolozsvári
- e Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health , University of Debrecen , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - Imre Rurik
- e Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health , University of Debrecen , Debrecen , Hungary
| | - Danica Rotar Pavlič
- f Department of Family Medicine , University of Ljubljana , Lubljana , Slovenia
| | | | - Giulia Borgioli
- h Azienda USL Toscana Centro - Global Health Center , Region of Tuscany , Florence , Italy
| | | | - Dean Ajduković
- j Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences , University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia
| | - Pim De Graaf
- g European Forum for Primary Care , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Nadja van Ginneken
- k Primary Medical Care , University of Liverpool , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- k Primary Medical Care , University of Liverpool , Liverpool , United Kingdom
| | - Christos Lionis
- b Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chin WY, Wan EYF, Dowrick C, Arroll B, Lam CLK. Tree analysis modeling of the associations between PHQ-9 depressive symptoms and doctor diagnosis of depression in primary care. Psychol Med 2019; 49:449-457. [PMID: 29697038 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between patient self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) symptoms and doctor diagnosis of depression using a tree analysis approach. METHODS This was a secondary analysis on a dataset obtained from 10 179 adult primary care patients and 59 primary care physicians (PCPs) across Hong Kong. Patients completed a waiting room survey collecting data on socio-demographics and the PHQ-9. Blinded doctors documented whether they thought the patient had depression. Data were analyzed using multiple logistic regression and conditional inference decision tree modeling. RESULTS PCPs diagnosed 594 patients with depression. Logistic regression identified gender, age, employment status, past history of depression, family history of mental illness and recent doctor visit as factors associated with a depression diagnosis. Tree analyses revealed different pathways of association between PHQ-9 symptoms and depression diagnosis for patients with and without past depression. The PHQ-9 symptom model revealed low mood, sense of worthlessness, fatigue, sleep disturbance and functional impairment as early classifiers. The PHQ-9 total score model revealed cut-off scores of >12 and >15 were most frequently associated with depression diagnoses in patients with and without past depression. CONCLUSIONS A past history of depression is the most significant factor associated with the diagnosis of depression. PCPs appear to utilize a hypothetical-deductive problem-solving approach incorporating pre-test probability, with different associated factors for patients with and without past depression. Diagnostic thresholds may be too low for patients with past depression and too high for those without, potentially leading to over and under diagnosis of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weng-Yee Chin
- Department of Family Medicine & Primary Care,Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine,The University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong
| | - Eric Yuk Fai Wan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society,University of Liverpool,Liverpool,UK
| | - Bruce Arroll
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care,Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences,University of Auckland,Auckland,New Zealand
| | - Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
- Department of Family Medicine & Primary Care,Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine,The University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van Loenen T, van den Muijsenbergh M, Hofmeester M, Dowrick C, van Ginneken N, Mechili EA, Angelaki A, Ajdukovic D, Bakic H, Pavlic DR, Zelko E, Hoffmann K, Jirovsky E, Mayrhuber ES, Dückers M, Mooren T, Gouweloos-Trines J, Kolozsvári L, Rurik I, Lionis C. Primary care for refugees and newly arrived migrants in Europe: a qualitative study on health needs, barriers and wishes. Eur J Public Health 2019; 28:82-87. [PMID: 29240907 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In order to provide effective primary care for refugees and to develop interventions tailored to them, we must know their needs. Little is known of the health needs and experiences of recently arrived refugees and other migrants throughout their journey through Europe. We aimed to gain insight into their health needs, barriers in access and wishes regarding primary health care. Methods In the spring of 2016, we conducted a qualitative, comparative case study in seven EU countries in a centre of first arrival, two transit centres, two intermediate-stay centres and two longer-stay centres using a Participatory Learning and Action research methodology. A total of 98 refugees and 25 healthcare workers participated in 43 sessions. Transcripts and sessions reports were coded and thematically analyzed by local researchers using the same format at all sites; data were synthesized and further analyzed by two other researchers independently. Results The main health problems of the participants related to war and to their harsh journey like common infections and psychological distress. They encountered important barriers in accessing healthcare: time pressure, linguistic and cultural differences and lack of continuity of care. They wish for compassionate, culturally sensitive healthcare workers and for more information on procedures and health promotion. Conclusion Health of refugees on the move in Europe is jeopardized by their bad living circumstances and barriers in access to healthcare. To address their needs, healthcare workers have to be trained in providing integrated, compassionate and cultural competent healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa van Loenen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Pharos, Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marrigje Hofmeester
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nadja van Ginneken
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Agapi Angelaki
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Dean Ajdukovic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Helena Bakic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Danica Rotar Pavlic
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Erika Zelko
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elena Jirovsky
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Sophie Mayrhuber
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michel Dückers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Impact, National Knowledge and Advice Centre for Psychosocial Care Concerning Critical Incidents, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Trudy Mooren
- Foundation Centrum '45, Arq, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Juul Gouweloos-Trines
- Impact, National Knowledge and Advice Centre for Psychosocial Care Concerning Critical Incidents, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - László Kolozsvári
- Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Imre Rurik
- Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Christos Lionis
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Maund E, Stuart B, Moore M, Dowrick C, Geraghty AWA, Dawson S, Kendrick T. Managing Antidepressant Discontinuation: A Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med 2019; 17:52-60. [PMID: 30670397 PMCID: PMC6342590 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine the effectiveness of interventions to manage antidepressant discontinuation, and the outcomes for patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis of studies published to March 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, or observational studies assessing interventions to facilitate discontinuation of antidepressants for depression in adults. Our primary outcomes were antidepressant discontinuation and discontinuation symptoms. Secondary outcomes were relapse/recurrence; quality of life; antidepressant reduction; and sexual, social, and occupational function. RESULTS Of 15 included studies, 12 studies (8 randomized controlled trials, 2 single-arm trials, 2 retrospective cohort studies) were included in the synthesis. None were rated as having high risk for selection or detection bias. Two studies prompting primary care clinician discontinuation with antidepressant tapering guidance found 6% and 7% of patients discontinued, vs 8% for usual care. Six studies of psychological or psychiatric treatment plus tapering reported cessation rates of 40% to 95%. Two studies reported a higher risk of discontinuation symptoms with abrupt termination. At 2 years, risk of relapse/recurrence was lower with cognitive behavioral therapy plus taper vs clinical management plus taper (15% to 25% vs 35% to 80%: risk ratio = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67; 2 studies). Relapse/recurrence rates were similar for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with tapering and maintenance antidepressants (44% to 48% vs 47% to 60%; 2 studies). CONCLUSIONS Cognitive behavioral therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy can help patients discontinue antidepressants without increasing the risk of relapse/recurrence, but are resource intensive. More scalable interventions incorporating psychological support are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Maund
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dawson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care & Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For older people with long-term conditions, regular structured activities within a community setting meeting others are thought to improve well being and quality of life. Historically local authority-run day care centres were widely available, but austerity measures have meant that in many areas, such provision has been markedly reduced and different models of day care services are being developed. There is little known about outcomes of day care provision for older people with long-term conditions. RECENT FINDINGS This review has critically examined the recent evidence on outcomes of day care provision for older people with long-term conditions and will focus on three areas - physical functioning, intergenerational provision and measurement of outcomes. In terms of interventions to improve physical functioning for older people with long-term conditions attending day care, there are few studies and it is difficult to generalize but there appears to be a trend for positive impact on physical functioning when activities are incorporated into a day care programme. There is a paucity of research on intergenerational provision, however, the small number of studies suggest positive benefits. Studies measuring outcomes for older people with long-term conditions attending day care services are very limited in terms of outcome data with the exception of a Canadian study, which suggested that attendance at day care could reduce hospital attendance and admissions. SUMMARY This review reveals a lack of research of day care provision for older people with long-term conditions. There is a suggestion in the small number of articles included in this review that there can be benefits both in terms of global outcomes of attendance and in improved physical functioning; there is limited evidence of the value of intergenerational provision. Robust research with collection of meaningful outcomes is required to ensure that the increasing number of older people with long-term conditions are enabled to access high-quality day care provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Lunt
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group (APSCSG), University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, England
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Olde Hartman T, Lam CL, Usta J, Clarke D, Fortes S, Dowrick C. Addressing the needs of patients with medically unexplained symptoms: 10 key messages. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:442-443. [PMID: 30166397 PMCID: PMC6104884 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x698813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Olde Hartman
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cindy Lk Lam
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jinan Usta
- Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - David Clarke
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, US
| | - Sandra Fortes
- University of Rio de Janeiro State, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rurik I, Kolozsvári LR, Aarendonk D, Angelaki A, Ajdukovic D, Dowrick C, Dückers M, Hoffmann K, Jancsó Z, Jirovsky E, Katz Z, Mechili EA, van den Muijsenbergh M, Nánási A, Petelos E, Rotar-Pavlic D, Sifaki-Pistolla D, Tamás H, Roland P, Ungvári T, Lionis C. [Primary care of refugees and migrants. Lesson learnt from the EUR-HUMAN project]. Orv Hetil 2018; 159:1414-1422. [PMID: 30146908 DOI: 10.1556/650.2018.31187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
In 2015, local wars, starvation and misery in some Middle Eastern, Asian and African countries forced millions of people to leave their homelands. Many of these people migrated toward Europe, reaching Hungary as well. The refugee crisis created significant challenges for all national healthcare systems across Europe. Limited attention has been given to the extent to which health service provision for refugees and migrants has become a task for primary health care (PHC), which has been unprepared as a profession and pressured by the enormous workload. Hungarian primary care was involved only to an extent in the refugees' health care, as most of the migrants entering Hungary wanted to move forward to other countries. The need for evidence-based patient-centred interventions to assess refugee healthcare needs, and for training programmes for rapid capacity-building for integrated PHC was addressed by the EUropean Refugees - HUman Movement and Advisory Network (EUR-HUMAN) project, which 7 European countries developed together. The overall aim of the EUR-HUMAN project is to enhance the knowledge and expertise of European member states who accept refugees and migrants in addressing their health needs, safeguarding them from risks, while at the same time to minimize cross-border health risks. This initiative focuses on addressing the early arrival period, transition and longer-term settlement of refugees in European host countries. A primary objective of this project is to identify, design and assess interventions to improve PHC delivery for refugees and migrants with a focus on vulnerable groups. The structure, the main focus and outputs of the project are described and summarized in this paper, providing relevant information and access to educational materials for Hungarian (primary care) physicians. The EUR-HUMAN project was operated in 2016 under the auspices of the European Commission and funded by the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA). Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(35): 1414-1422.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imre Rurik
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | - László Róbert Kolozsvári
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | | | - Agapi Angelaki
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete Greece
| | - Dean Ajdukovic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb Croatia
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool United Kingdom
| | - Michel Dückers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna Austria
| | - Zoltán Jancsó
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | - Elena Jirovsky
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna Austria
| | - Zoltán Katz
- Műveleti Medicina Tanszék, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar Pécs
| | | | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community Care, St Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Nánási
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | - Elena Petelos
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete Greece
| | - Danica Rotar-Pavlic
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana Slovenia
| | | | - Hajnalka Tamás
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | - Palla Roland
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032.,PROMO-MED Kft. Győrújbarát
| | - Tímea Ungvári
- Családorvosi és Foglalkozás-egészségügyi Tanszék, Debreceni Egyetem, Népegészségügyi Kar Debrecen, Móricz Zs. krt. 22., 4032
| | - Christos Lionis
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete Greece
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is reported that, given the right support, most people would prefer to die at home, yet a very small minority of people with dementia do so. At present, knowledge gaps remain on how best to support end-of-life care at home for people with dementia. AIM: To identify and understand the challenges and facilitators of providing end-of-life care at home for people with dementia. DESIGN: Narrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data. DATA SOURCES: The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) and reference lists of key journals were searched up to July 2017. RESULTS: Searches returned 1949 unique titles, of which seven studies met all the eligibility criteria (four quantitative and three qualitative). Six key themes were identified – four facilitators and two challenges. Facilitators included ‘support from health care professionals’, ‘informal caregiver resilience and extended social networks’, ‘medications and symptom management’ and ‘appropriate equipment and home adaptations’. Challenges included ‘issues with professional services’ and ‘worsening of physical or mental health’. CONCLUSION: People with dementia may not always require specialist palliative care at the end of life. Further research is required to overcome the methodological shortcomings of previous studies and establish how community development approaches to palliative care, such as compassionate communities, can support families to allow a greater number of people with dementia to die at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Mogan
- 1 Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mari Lloyd-Williams
- 1 Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Karen Harrison Dening
- 1 Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,2 Research and Evaluation, Dementia UK, London, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- 1 Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bradley N, Lloyd‐Williams M, Dowrick C. Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life-limiting illness-A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 27:e12837. [PMID: 29573500 PMCID: PMC6001732 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Individuals managing the challenges of life-limiting illness require adequate social support to maintain quality of life. Qualitative research reports that patients value highly the social support obtained in palliative care interventions such as day care and group therapies. This systematic review aims to summarise existing quantitative evidence on palliative care interventions that facilitate social support. Research literature was systematically searched using electronic databases and key journals. Searches returned a total of 6,247 unique titles of which sixteen were eligible for inclusion. Interventions include group therapies, group practical interventions and palliative day care. Outcome measures and study designs were heterogeneous. Only one study used a validated outcome measure of social support. Benefits were influenced by participant characteristics such as baseline distress. Partial economic evaluation was attempted by two studies. Methodological challenges include attrition and use of outcome measures that were insensitive to change. Statistically significant results were reported in psychological and physical domains. Evidence is limited due to methodological issues and a scarcity of quantitative research, particularly regarding long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness. Interventions may be more beneficial to some groups than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Bradley
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies GroupInstitute of Psychology Health and SocietyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - M. Lloyd‐Williams
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies GroupInstitute of Psychology Health and SocietyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - C. Dowrick
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies GroupInstitute of Psychology Health and SocietyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Papadakaki M, Lionis C, Saridaki A, Dowrick C, de Brún T, O'Reilly-de Brún M, O'Donnell CA, Burns N, van Weel-Baumgarten E, van den Muijsenbergh M, Spiegel W, MacFarlane A. Exploring barriers to primary care for migrants in Greece in times of austerity: Perspectives of service providers. Eur J Gen Pract 2018; 23:128-134. [PMID: 28388310 PMCID: PMC5774264 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1307336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Migration in Europe is increasing at an unprecedented rate. There is an urgent need to develop ‘migrant-sensitive healthcare systems’. However, there are many barriers to healthcare for migrants. Despite Greece’s recent, significant experiences of inward migration during a period of economic austerity, little is known about Greek primary care service providers’ experiences of delivering care to migrants. Objectives: To identify service providers’ views on the barriers to migrant healthcare. Methods: Qualitative study involving six participatory learning and action (PLA) focus group sessions with nine service providers. Data generation was informed by normalization process theory (NPT). Thematic analysis was applied to identify barriers to efficient migrant healthcare. Results: Three main provider and system-related barriers emerged: (a) emphasis on major challenges in healthcare provision, (b) low perceived control and effectiveness to support migrant healthcare, and (c) attention to impoverished local population. Conclusion: The study identified major provider and system-related barriers in the provision of primary healthcare to migrants. It is important for the healthcare system in Greece to provide appropriate supports for communication in cross-cultural consultations for its diversifying population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Papadakaki
- a Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.,b Department of Social Work , School of Health and Social Welfare, Technological Educational Institute of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | - Christos Lionis
- a Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece
| | | | - Christopher Dowrick
- c Institute of Psychology, Health and Society , University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
| | - Tomas de Brún
- d Discipline of General Practice , School of Medicine, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland
| | - Mary O'Reilly-de Brún
- d Discipline of General Practice , School of Medicine, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland
| | - Catherine A O'Donnell
- e General Practice and Primary Care , Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK
| | - Nicola Burns
- e General Practice and Primary Care , Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK.,f Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University , Lancaster , UK
| | | | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- g Department of Primary and Community Care Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen The Netherlands.,h Pharos Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Spiegel
- i Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Anne MacFarlane
- j Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick , Limerick , Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lionis C, Petelos E, Mechili EA, Sifaki-Pistolla D, Chatzea VE, Angelaki A, Rurik I, Pavlic DR, Dowrick C, Dückers M, Ajdukovic D, Bakic H, Jirovsky E, Mayrhuber ES, van den Muijsenbergh M, Hoffmann K. Assessing refugee healthcare needs in Europe and implementing educational interventions in primary care: a focus on methods. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2018; 18:11. [PMID: 29422090 PMCID: PMC5806359 DOI: 10.1186/s12914-018-0150-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The current political crisis, conflicts and riots in many Middle Eastern and African countries have led to massive migration waves towards Europe. European countries, receiving these migratory waves as first port of entry (POE) over the past few years, were confronted with several challenges as a result of the sheer volume of newly arriving refugees. This humanitarian refugee crisis represents the biggest displacement crisis of a generation. Although the refugee crisis created significant challenges for all national healthcare systems across Europe, limited attention has been given to the role of primary health care (PHC) to facilitate an integrated delivery of care by enhancing care provision to refugees upon arrival, on transit or even for longer periods. Evidence-based interventions, encompassing elements of patient-centredness, shared decision-making and compassionate care, could contribute to the assessment of refugee healthcare needs and to the development and the implementation of training programmes for rapid capacity-building for the needs of these vulnerable groups and in the context of integrated PHC care. This article reports on methods used for enhancing PHC for refugees through rapid capacity-building actions in the context of a structured European project under the auspices of the European Commission and funded under the 3rd Health Programme by the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA). The methods include the assessment of the health needs of all the people reaching Europe during the study period, and the identification, development, and testing of educational tools. The developed tools were evaluated following implementation in selected European primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Lionis
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece.
| | - Elena Petelos
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece
| | - Enkeleint-Aggelos Mechili
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece
| | - Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece
| | - Vasiliki-Eirini Chatzea
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece
| | - Agapi Angelaki
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, University Campus, Voutes, Heraklion, 70013, Crete, GR, Greece
| | - Imre Rurik
- Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Danica Rotar Pavlic
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michel Dückers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dean Ajdukovic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Helena Bakic
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Elena Jirovsky
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Sophie Mayrhuber
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chondros P, Davidson S, Wolfe R, Gilchrist G, Dowrick C, Griffiths F, Hegarty K, Herrman H, Gunn J. Development of a prognostic model for predicting depression severity in adult primary patients with depressive symptoms using the diamond longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2018; 227:854-860. [PMID: 29689701 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression trajectories among primary care patients are highly variable, making it difficult to identify patients that require intensive treatments or those that are likely to spontaneously remit. Currently, there are no easily implementable tools clinicians can use to stratify patients with depressive symptoms into different treatments according to their likely depression trajectory. We aimed to develop a prognostic tool to predict future depression severity among primary care patients with current depressive symptoms at three months. METHODS Patient-reported data from the diamond study, a prospective cohort of 593 primary care patients with depressive symptoms attending 30 Australian general practices. Participants responded affirmatively to at least one of the first two PHQ-9 items. Twenty predictors were pre-selected by expert consensus based on reliability, ease of administration, likely patient acceptability, and international applicability. Multivariable mixed effects linear regression was used to build the model. RESULTS The prognostic model included eight baseline predictors: sex, depressive symptoms, anxiety, history of depression, self-rated health, chronic physical illness, living alone, and perceived ability to manage on available income. Discrimination (c-statistic =0.74; 95% CI: 0.70-0.78) and calibration (agreement between predicted and observed symptom scores) were acceptable and comparable to other prognostic models in primary care. LIMITATIONS More complex model was not feasible because of modest sample size. Validation studies needed to confirm model performance in new primary care attendees. CONCLUSION A brief, easily administered algorithm predicting the severity of depressive symptoms has potential to assist clinicians to tailor treatment for adult primary care patients with current depressive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patty Chondros
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Sandra Davidson
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Gail Gilchrist
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia; National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Griffiths
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia; WMS-Social Science and Systems in Health, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - Kelsey Hegarty
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Herrman
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, and Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|