Screening for bipolar disorder with self-administered questionnaires: A critique of the concept and a call to stop publishing studies of their performance in psychiatric samples

Clinical Correlates of False Positive Assignment in Bipolar Screening Measures Across Psychiatric Diagnoses among Patients without Bipolar Disorder

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to determine clinical correlates of false positive assignment (FPA) on commonly used bipolar screening questionnaires.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to a total of 3885 psychiatric outpatients. After excluding patients who have bipolar spectrum illnesses, patients who were assigned as having hypomania on the mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) or the hypomania checklist-32 (HCL-32) were identified as patients who had FPA. Psychiatric diagnoses and severity of emotional symptoms were compared between patients with and without FPA.

RESULTS

Patients with FPA on the MDQ showed significant associations with presence of major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and alcohol-use disorder, while patients with FPA on the HCL-32 showed associations with presence of panic disorder and agoraphobia. FPA on the MDQ was also associated with greater emotional symptoms and lifetime history of suicide attempts. Logistic regression analysis showed that male sex, younger age, presence of alcohol-use disorder, and severity of depression and obsessive-compulsive symptoms were significantly associated with FPA on the MDQ.

CONCLUSION

The FPA for the MDQ was associated with clinical factors linked to trait impulsivity, and the FPA for both the MDQ and the HCL-32 could be related to increased anxiety.

Mood Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the prevalence of the major mood disorders (major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder) in the community and within neurologic settings, articulates the steps taken to make a diagnosis of major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder, and reviews old and newer treatment options with proven efficacy for the treatment of these two conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

New medications are available as treatment options for major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, such as intranasal and IV ketamine, and somatic treatments, such as deep brain stimulation and vagal nerve stimulators, are being used to target treatment-resistant depression.

SUMMARY

Mood disorders are common in neurologic settings. They are disabling and increase morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion if they suspect their patients seem more distressed or incapacitated than would be warranted by their neurologic disorders. If a patient does have a mood disorder, validating the patient's experience, initiating treatment, and, if necessary, referring the patient to a primary care physician or psychiatrist are appropriate steps.

Screening for Bipolar Disorder and Finding Borderline Personality Disorder: A Replication and Extension

The authors' group previously reported that patients who screened positive on the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ), the most frequently studied screening scale for bipolar disorder, were as likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) as with bipolar disorder. A limitation of that study was that the authors examined the performance of the MDQ in patients presenting for various psychiatric disorders, including depression. The recognition of bipolar disorder and its differential diagnosis with BPD is of greatest clinical relevance in depressed patients. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, the authors attempted to replicate their initial findings in a new sample of psychiatric outpatients, and they also examined the performance of the MDQ in depressed patients. The results of the present study were consistent with the original report, thereby indicating that the MDQ is not effective in helping distinguish bipolar disorder from BPD.

Can P300 aid in the differential diagnosis of unipolar disorder versus bipolar disorder depression? A meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to distinguish between bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar disorder (UD) depression. Given the different pattern of cognitive impairments between BD and UD, P300 is potentially useful for the differential diagnosis. This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the extent of difference in P300 in patients with BD versus UD depression.

METHODS

Studies comparing P300 between depressed BD and UD patients with or without healthy controls (HCs) were retrieved from major English and Chinese databases. Studies with BD and UD samples that were comparable in terms of age, gender, and depression severity, were rated as having high quality. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of P300 latency and amplitude were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, eight studies with a total of 397 depressed BD patients, 390 depressed UD patients, and 497 HCs, were included. Among included studies, six were rated as having good quality and three followed BD (n = 146) and UD (n = 144) patients during remission. BD patients had significantly longer P300 latency than UD patients during major depressive episode [SMD (95%CI): 0.580 (0.309, 0.850)] and remission [SMD (95%CI): 1.583 (1.322, 1.844)]. Compared to HCs, remitted BD patients still had significantly longer P300 latency [SMD (95%CI): 0.857 (0.059, 1.656)] but P300 latency of remitted UD patients had decreased to normal [SMD (95%CI): 0.536 (-0.272, 1.343)].

LIMITATIONS

Sample sizes of depressed and remitted patients with BD and UD of included studies are small.

CONCLUSIONS

P300 latency can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic marker for differentiating BD from UD depression.