Relative sensitivity of thyroid fine-needle aspiration by tumor type and size

Examining the impact of several factors including COVID-19 on thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy

OBJECTIVE

The study explores various factors, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) history and vaccination status, that influence the classification value of ultrasonography-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB) by comparing non-diagnostic (Bethesda-I) and diagnostic (Bethesda II-VI) results.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study in a high-volume tertiary care center involving patients who underwent TFNAB from November 2022 to April 2023. The study retrospectively analyzed the cytopathology of 482 thyroid nodules. Patients were categorized into non-diagnostic (n = 136) and Diagnostic groups (n = 346) based on TFNAB. A comprehensive set of parameters was examined, including demographic, anthropometric and clinical data, thyroid ultrasonography findings, COVID-19 history and immunization status.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.1 ± 12.1 years in the non-diagnostic group and 53.5 ± 13 years in the Diagnostic group (p = .223). 75.7% (n = 103) of the non-Diagnostic group and 82.9% (n = 287) of the Diagnostic group were male (p = .070). The mean nodule longitudinal diameter of the Diagnostic group was significantly higher than that of the non-diagnostic group (p = .015). The TIRADS score of the nodules showed a statistical difference between the groups (p = .048). The groups had no significant differences regarding other ultrasonographic parameters and COVID-19-related variables.

CONCLUSION

It can be assumed that when the longitudinal diameter of the thyroid nodule is small and in TIRADS categories other than the TIRADS3 category, TFNAB is less likely to be diagnostic. However, future research may be needed to confirm these findings and uncover any long-term effects of COVID-19 or vaccines on thyroid nodule diagnostics.

Cadherin-16 (CDH16) immunohistochemistry: a useful diagnostic tool for renal cell carcinoma and papillary carcinomas of the thyroid

Cadherin-16 (CDH16) plays a role in the embryonal development in kidney and thyroid. Downregulation of CDH16 RNA was found in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid. To determine the expression of CDH16 in tumors and to assess the diagnostic utility a tissue microarray containing 15,584 samples from 152 different tumor types as well as 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed. A membranous CDH16 immunostaining was predominantly seen in thyroid, kidney, cauda epididymis, and mesonephric remnants. In the thyroid, CDH16 staining was seen in 100% of normal samples, 86% of follicular adenomas, 60% of follicular carcinomas, but only 7% of papillary carcinomas (p < 0.0001). CDH16 positivity was frequent in nephrogenic adenomas (100%), oncocytomas (98%), chromophobe (97%), clear cell (85%), and papillary (76%) renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), various subtypes of carcinoma of the ovary (16-56%), various subtyped of carcinomas of the uterus (18-40%), as well as in various subtypes of neuroendocrine neoplasms (4-26%). Nineteen further tumor entities showed a weak to moderate CDH16 staining in up to 8% of cases. Our data suggest CDH16 as a potential diagnostic marker-as a part of a panel-for the identification of papillary carcinomas of the thyroid, nephrogenic adenomas, and the distinction of renal cell tumors from other neoplasms.

Thyroid FNA: Is cytopathologist review of ultrasound features useful?

Cytopathologist review of thyroid ultrasound (US) has been proposed to be useful in diagnosis and patient triage. This review explores the implications for practicing cytopathologists of integrating US review into the thyroid fine-needle aspiration diagnosis. At present, there is no agreed-upon system for combining cytologic and US features and communicating those results as a single report. If cytologists are performing tasks that require expertise in US interpretation, then they should know and be fully conversant with US interpretation. Whether cytologists performing aspirations require expertise in US interpretation is not clear. Regardless, cytologists should avoid using US results to alter their cytologic interpretations unless they clearly communicate that this is what they are doing. An evidence-based integrated reporting system that would allow cytologists to clearly explain to other physicians exactly how they reached their interpretation might provide value beyond current standard practice.

Oncocytic poorly differentiated (insular) thyroid carcinoma mimicking metastatic adenocarcinoma. A case report and review of the literature

We report the cytohistologic and immunohistochemical findings of an oncocytic variant of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma in a 76-year old man with a prior history of prostatic adenocarcinoma. The man complained of a palpable nodule in the right thyroid lobe and cervical lymph node. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in both cases yielded solid clusters of cells/insulae, microfollicles, and isolated atypical cells. Considering the patient's past history, an initial diagnosis of metastasis from prostate adenocarcinoma was considered. However, immunohistochemical staining of liquid-based cytology specimens (Thin-Prep) showed diffuse positive results for TTF-1 and thyroglobulin. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy with bilateral neck dissection. Histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation showed a poorly differentiated oncocytic thyroid carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastases. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the immunocytochemical evaluation of this rare variant of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma using FNA and liquid based cytology.

'Suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma' before and after The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: impact of standardized terminology

BACKGROUND

The high-risk 'suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma' (SPTC) is a clinically relevant diagnosis in the cytological interpretation of thyroid aspirates. While The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has provided invaluable terminology standardization, a performance comparison for this diagnostic category has not been performed. Therefore, this study evaluates the SPTC diagnosis before and after the introduction of TBSRTC in a large meta-analysis and at a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The meta-analysis analyzed publications of SPTC or similar diagnoses before and after the introduction of TBSRTC. Similarly our own institutional experience was analyzed for the 8 years surrounding the introduction of TBSRTC. A correlation of the cytopathology and surgical pathology diagnoses was performed.

RESULTS

The introduction of TBSRTC coincided with a significant decrease in the fraction of cases called SPTC in the meta-analysis (4.5-3.1%, p < 0.00001) and in the institutional review (1.7-0.9%, p = 0.005). Meanwhile, the malignancy risk for those cases increased significantly in the meta-analysis from 62.5 to 80.5% (p < 0.00001) and trended upwards in the institutional review from 69 to 79% (p = 0.4). The follow-up rate was similar in both time periods in the meta-analysis and the institutional review.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of TBSRTC coincided with a decrease in the fraction of cases called SPTC and an increase in the malignancy risk associated with that diagnosis.