1
|
Lamoreau R, Obus E, Koren-Karie N, Gray SAO. The Protective Effects of Parent-Child Emotion Dialogues for Preschoolers Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence. Attach Hum Dev 2023; 25:613-639. [PMID: 37962391 PMCID: PMC10841411 DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2023.2272268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) during early childhood is associated with self-regulation difficulties. Caregivers can facilitate children's self-regulation through emotion-focused conversations about past experiences, buffering downstream effects. However, caregivers experiencing violence may avoid distressing emotions activated by such conversations. This paper explores two different models of relational stress responses, one involving indirect effects (i.e. spillover effects) and the other moderation (i.e. buffering effects). Mothers (n = 117), oversampled for violence exposure, self-reported on IPV and participated in an emotional reminiscing task with children (aged 3-5 years); narratives were coded for maternal sensitive guidance. Maternal sensitive guidance was related to children's self-regulation. Sensitive guidance did not have indirect effects in the association between IPV exposure and children's self-regulation, but did buffer the association between physical IPV and self-regulation; this pattern did not hold for psychological IPV. Results suggest sensitive guidance during reminiscing may promote self-regulation in contexts of high IPV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Lamoreau
- Department of Psychology, Tulane University School of Science and Engineering, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elsa Obus
- Department of Psychology, Tulane University School of Science and Engineering, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Nina Koren-Karie
- Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sarah A O Gray
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King GL, Macdonald JA, Greenwood CJ, Kehoe C, Dunsmore JC, Havighurst SS, Youssef GJ, Berkowitz TS, Westrupp EM. Profiles of parents' emotion socialization within a multinational sample of parents. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1161418. [PMID: 37637929 PMCID: PMC10447894 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Seminal emotion socialization theories classify parents according to two patterns of parent emotion socialization processes: 'emotion coaching' (i.e., parents validate and teach children about emotions) versus 'emotion dismissing' parenting (i.e., parents minimize and dismiss their children's emotions). However, empirical evidence supporting this binary distinction of parents remains limited. Our objective was to investigate whether parents can be differentiated by distinct patterns in their (1) beliefs about children's emotions, (2) emotion regulation, and (3) emotion-related parenting practices. Method Participants were parents of children aged 4-10 years from the Child and Parent Emotion Study (N = 869) (https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e038124). Parents completed self-reported measures of emotion socialization processes via an online survey, which took 20-30 min to complete. Data included in the current study were collected May-August 2019. We conducted a latent profile analysis of parents' emotion socialization (13 indicators). To assess reliability of the profiles, we examined stability of the profiles across (1) parents of children in early versus middle childhood, and (2) fathers versus mothers, via measurement invariance testing. Further, to assess for construct validity of the profiles, we examined concurrent associations between six criterion constructs and parents' emotion socialization profiles. Results A three-profile model emerged characterizing parents by: (1) emotion coaching; (2) emotion dismissing; (3) emotion disengaged. There was strong support for construct validity and reliability. Discussion Our study provides empirical support for distinct differentiated classifications of emotion coaching and emotion dismissing parenting, aligned with emotion socialization theories. We further extend on extant theory and suggest a third 'emotion disengaged' classification, describing parents with moderate levels of emotion dismissing parenting and low levels of emotion coaching parenting. It should be noted that the profiles were derived with self-report data, therefore, data may have been biased by contextual factors. Furthermore, the study sample consisted of Western families from affluent backgrounds. The field should focus efforts on conducting person-centered studies with more diverse samples in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacqui A. Macdonald
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J. Greenwood
- Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christiane Kehoe
- Mindful, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie C. Dunsmore
- Human Development and Family Sciences, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sophie S. Havighurst
- Mindful, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - George J. Youssef
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth M. Westrupp
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tung NYC, Yap Y, Bei B, Luecken LJ, Wiley JF. A 14-day ecological momentary assessment study on whether resilience and early family risk moderate daily stress and affect on cortisol diurnal slope. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1240. [PMID: 35075226 PMCID: PMC8786880 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05277-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examined whether resilience capacity moderates the association of daily perceived stress and affect with cortisol diurnal slope among relocated emerging adults. Relocated undergraduates (N = 98; aged 18-25 years) were recruited from three groups: Resilient, Vulnerable, and Control. The Resilient group required Risky Family Questionnaire (RFQ) scores ≥ 29 and Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores ≥ 3.6. The Vulnerable group required RFQ scores ≥ 29 and BRS scores ≤ 3. The comparison Control group required RFQ scores ≤ 21 and T-scores < 60 on PROMIS anxiety and depression symptoms. Mixed-effects models were used to test the unique associations of perceived stress, negative affect, and positive affect x group interactions (predictors) on diurnal cortisol slope (outcome) across 14 consecutive days. The Resilient group did not moderate the associations between daily stress or affect on cortisol diurnal slope. Instead, both the Resilient and Vulnerable groups with early family risk, showed a steeper diurnal slope unique to higher stress and a flatter slope unique to higher negative affect. Results suggest that riskier early family life was significantly associated with altered cortisol diurnal slope outcomes to stress (i.e., demand) and negative affect (i.e., distress). These associations were not attenuated by current resilience capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Yan Chi Tung
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Yang Yap
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Bei Bei
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Linda J Luecken
- Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA
| | - Joshua F Wiley
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|