Metformin reduces risk of varicose veins in patients with type 2 diabetes

Vicious Circle With Venous Hypertension, Irregular Flow, Pathological Venous Wall Remodeling, and Valve Destruction in Chronic Venous Disease: A Review

Substantial advances occurred in phlebological practice in the last two decades. With the use of modern diagnostic equipment, the patients' venous hemodynamics can be examined in detail in everyday practice. Application of venous segments for arterial bypasses motivated studies on the effect of hemodynamic load on the venous wall. New animal models have been developed to study hemodynamic effects on the venous system. In vivo and in vitro studies revealed cellular phase transitions of venous endothelial, smooth muscle, and fibroblastic cells and changes in connective tissue composition, under hemodynamic load and at different locations of the chronically diseased venous system. This review is an attempt to integrate our knowledge from epidemiology, paleoanthropology and anthropology, clinical and experimental hemodynamic studies, histology, cell physiology, cell pathology, and molecular biology on the complex pathomechanism of this frequent disease. Our conclusion is that the disease is initiated by limited genetic adaptation of mankind not to bipedalism but to bipedalism in the unmoving standing or sitting position. In the course of the disease several pathologic vicious circles emerge, sustained venous hypertension inducing cellular phase transitions, chronic wall inflammation, apoptosis of cells, pathologic dilation, and valvular damage which, in turn, further aggravate the venous hypertension.

Metformin’s effects on varicocele, erectile dysfunction, infertility and prostate-related diseases: A retrospective cohort study

Objectives: To investigate the risk of varicocele, erectile dysfunction (ED), infertility, prostatitis, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer associated with metformin use.

Materials and methods: A total of 261,838 males, mean age 52.39 years (SD: 11.39), with a new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in 1999–2009 were identified from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Among them, 175,171 were metformin initiators [metformin (+)] and 86,667 were non-metformin initiators [metformin (−)] in the initial 12-month prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs. Follow-up started after the initial 12-month prescriptions. Outcomes were followed up until 31 December 2011. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) hazard ratios comparing metformin (+) to metformin (−) were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment-weighting using propensity scores.

Results: The median follow-up time ranged 5.55–6.82 years in metformin (−) and 4.36–5.17 years in metformin (+) for different outcomes in ITT analyses. The respective median follow-up time in PP analyses ranged 2.20–2.61 years in metformin (−) and ranged 3.99–4.65 years in metformin (+). In the ITT analyses, for metformin (−), the incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) of varicocele, ED, infertility, prostatitis, BPH and prostate cancer were 26.42, 455.89, 22.82, 590.23, 4226.19, and 141.69, respectively; and the respective incidence rates for metformin (+) were 25.65, 488.10, 32.60, 510.30, 3685.66, and 116.57. The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing metformin (+) to metformin (−) in the ITT analyses were 0.960 (0.784–1.174) for varicocele, 1.077 (1.026–1.130) for ED, 1.368 (1.116–1.676) for infertility, 0.887 (0.849–0.927) for prostatitis, 0.883 (0.868–0.899) for BPH and 0.878 (0.802–0.961) for prostate cancer. The hazard ratios for the respective outcomes in the PP analyses were 0.845 (0.662–1.078), 1.350 (1.264–1.441), 1.396 (1.078–1.808), 0.800 (0.756–0.846), 0.875 (0.855–0.895), and 0.613 (0.548–0.686).

Conclusion: Metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a neutral effect on varicocele, a higher risk of sexual dysfunction (ED and infertility) and a reduced risk of prostate-related health (prostatitis, BPH and prostate cancer).

Integrative analysis prioritizes the relevant genes and risk factors for chronic venous disease

OBJECTIVES

Chronic venous disease (CVD) refers to a range of symptoms resulting from long-term morphological and functional abnormalities of the venous system. However, the mechanism of CVD development remains largely unknown. Here we aim to provide more information on CVD pathogenesis, prevention strategies and therapy development through the integrative analysis of large-scale genetic data.

METHODS

Genetic data were obtained from publicly accessible databases. We utilized different approaches, including FUMA, DEPICT, Sherlock, SMR/HEIDIS, DEPICT and NetWAS to identify possible causal genes for CVD. Candidate genes were prioritized to further literature-based review. The differential expression of prioritized genes was validated by microarray from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), a public genomics data repository" and Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) of varicose veins (VVs) specimens. The causal relationships between risk factors and CVD were assessed using the Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

RESULTS

We identified 46 lead single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 26 plausible causal genes for CVD. Microarray data indicated differential expression of possible causal genes in CVD when compared to controls. The expression levels of WDR92, RSPO3, LIMA, ABCB10, DNAJC7, C1S, CXCL1 were significantly down-regulated (P<0.05). PHLDA1 and SERPINE1 were significantly upregulated (P<0.05). Dysregulated expression of WDR92, RSPO3 and CASZ1 was also found in varicose vein specimens by qPCR. Two-sample MR suggested causative effects of BMI (OR, 1.008, 95%CI, 1.005-1.010), standing height (OR, 1.009, 95%CI, 1.007-1.011), college degree (OR, 0.983, 95%CI, 0.991-0.976), insulin (OR, 0.858, 95%CI, 0.794-0.928) and metformin (OR, 0.944, 95%CI, 0.904-0.985) on CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study integrates genetic and gene expression data to make an effective risk gene prediction and etiological inferences for CVD. Prioritized candidate genes provide more insights into CVD pathogenesis, and the causative effects of risk factors on CVD that deserve further investigation.

Metformin and risk of gingival/periodontal diseases in diabetes patients: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

To compare the risk of gingival and periodontal diseases (GPD) between ever users and never users of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The Taiwan's National Health Insurance database was used to enroll 423,949 patients with new onset diabetes mellitus from 1999 to 2005. After excluding ineligible patients, 60,309 ever users and 5578 never users were followed up for the incidence of GPD from January 1, 2006 until December 31, 2011. Propensity score-weighted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression.

RESULTS

GPD was newly diagnosed in 18,528 ever users (incidence: 7746.51 per 100,000 person-years) and 2283 never users (incidence: 12158.59 per 100,000 person-years). The hazard ratio that compared ever users to never users was 0.627 (95% confidence interval: 0.600-0.655). When metformin use was categorized by tertiles of cumulative duration and cumulative dose, the risk significantly reduced in a dose-response pattern when the cumulative duration reached approximately 2 years or the cumulative dose reached 670 grams. Analyses on the tertiles of defined daily dose of metformin showed that the reduction of GPD risk could be seen in all three subgroups but the benefit would be greater when the daily dose increased.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of metformin is associated with a significantly reduced risk of GPD.

Clinical assessment of endovenous thermal ablation combined with concomitant phlebectomy for the treatment of lower limb varicose veins with or without poor glycemic control

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical results of endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy for unilateral varicose veins based on diabetic management.

METHODS

The study reviewed 501 patients who underwent endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy for unilateral varicose veins, including 337 nondiabetics (control group) and 164 diabetics. Diabetics with hemoglobin A1c ≥7% were classified as the poor glycemic control group, and hemoglobin A1c <7% as the good glycemic control group. Surgical outcomes were assessed by Venous Clinical Severity Score. The Chronic Venous disease quality of life Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life.

RESULTS

Lower limb varicose veins can be treated successfully with endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy in patients with or without poor glycemic control, accompanied by a significant improvement in health status. For patients with initial varicose veins (preoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score <10), the results revealed satisfactory improvements in Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality of life among the control, poor glycemic control, and good glycemic control groups. Patients with advanced varicose veins (preoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score ≥10) also showed an obvious amelioration concerning venous symptoms and quality of life. However, the extent of improvement varied among the 3 groups. Patients subjected to advanced varicose veins with the condition of poor glycemic control exhibited a less desirable improvement in postoperative health conditions compared with the control and good glycemic control groups, especially in edema relief and ulcer healing.

CONCLUSION

Endovenous thermal ablation combined with stab phlebectomy is safe and effective in the treatment of varicose veins with or without poor glycemic control. Clinical attempts at hemoglobin A1c management may contribute to improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced varicose veins.

Metformin and Risk of Malignant Brain Tumors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The risk of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use has rarely been investigated in humans. This retrospective cohort study investigated such an association. Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed from 1999 to 2005 in the nationwide database of Taiwan’s national health insurance were used to enroll study subjects. We first identified an unmatched cohort of 153,429 ever users and 16,222 never users of metformin. A cohort of 16,222 ever users and 16,222 never users matched on propensity score was then created from this unmatched cohort. All patients were followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. The incidence density was calculated and hazard ratios were derived from Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using a propensity score. The results showed that 27 never users and 155 ever users developed malignant brain tumors in the unmatched cohort. The incidence rate was 37.11 per 100,000 person-years in never users and 21.39 per 100,000 person-years in ever users. The overall hazard ratio comparing ever users versus never users was 0.574 (95% confidence interval: 0.381–0.863). The respective hazard ratios comparing the first (<27.13 months), second (27.13–58.33 months), and third (>58.33 months) tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy versus never users were 0.897 (0.567–1.421), 0.623 (0.395–0.984), and 0.316 (0.192–0.518). In the matched cohort, the overall hazard ratio was 0.317 (0.149–0.673) and the respective hazard ratios were 0.427 (0.129–1.412), 0.509 (0.196–1.322), and 0.087 (0.012–0.639) for the first, second, and third tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy. In conclusion, this study shows a risk reduction of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use in a dose–response pattern. The risk reduction is more remarkable when metformin has been used for approximately 2–5 years.

The Relationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Gastric Cancer and the Potential Benefits of Metformin: An Extensive Review of the Literature

The objective of this review is to summarize the findings of published research that investigated the relationship between diabetes mellitus and gastric cancer (GCa) and the potential benefits of metformin on GCa. Related literature has been extensively reviewed, and findings from studies investigating the relationship between diabetes mellitus and GCa suggest that hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are closely related to the development of GCa. Although not supported by all, most observational studies suggest an increased risk of GCa in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in women and in Asian populations. Incidence of second primary malignancy diagnosed after GCa is significantly higher in diabetes patients. Diabetes patients with GCa may have more complications after gastrectomy or chemotherapy and they may have a poorer prognosis than patients with GCa but without diabetes mellitus. However, glycemic control may improve in the diabetes patients with GCa after receiving gastrectomy, especially after procedures that bypass the duodenum and proximal jejunum, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or Billroth II reconstruction. The potential links between diabetes mellitus and GCa may involve the interactions with shared risk factors (e.g., obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, high salt intake, smoking, etc.), Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, medications (e.g., insulin, metformin, statins, aspirin, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, etc.) and comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, vascular complications, heart failure, renal failure, etc.). With regards to the potential benefits of metformin on GCa, results of most observational studies suggest a reduced risk of GCa associated with metformin use in patients with T2DM, which can be supported by evidence derived from many in vitro and animal studies. Metformin use may also reduce the risk of HP infection, an important risk factor of GCa. In patients with GCa, metformin users may have improved survival and reduced recurrence. More studies are required to clarify the pathological subtypes/anatomical sites of GCa associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prevented by metformin, to confirm whether GCa risk can also be increased in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to explore the possible role of gastric microbiota in the development of GCa.

The Effect of Metformin on Male Reproductive Function and Prostate: An Updated Review

Metformin is the first-line oral antidiabetic drug that shows multiple pleiotropic effects of anti-inflamation, anti-cancer, anti-aging, anti-microbia, anti-atherosclerosis, and immune modulation. Metformin's effects on men's related health are reviewed here, focusing on reproductive health under subtitles of erectile dysfunction (ED), steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis; and on prostate-related health under subtitles of prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostatitis, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and prostate cancer (PCa). Updated literature suggests a potential role of metformin on arteriogenic ED but controversial and contradictory effects (either protective or harmful) on testicular functions of testosterone synthesis and spermatogenesis. With regards to prostate-related health, metformin use may be associated with lower levels of PSA in humans, but its clinical implications require more research. Although there is a lack of research on metform's effect on prostatitis, it may have potential benefits through its anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties. Metformin may reduce the risk of BPH by inhibiting the insulin-like growth factor 1 pathway and some but not all studies suggest a protective role of metformin on the risk of PCa. Many clinical trials are being conducted to investigate the use of metformin as an adjuvant therapy for PCa but results currently available are not conclusive. While some trials suggest a benefit in reducing the metastasis and recurrence of PCa, others do not show any benefit. More research works are warranted to illuminate the potential usefulness of metformin in the promotion of men's health.

Chronic Metformin Therapy is Associated with a Lower Risk of Hemorrhoid in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Metformin has anti-inflammatory property and reduces the risk of varicose vein in our previous study.

Aim: To investigate the risk of hemorrhoid, another common disease involving the hemorrhoidal venous plexus, in ever vs. never users of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999–2005 were enrolled from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. All patients who were alive on January 1, 2006 were followed up until December 31, 2011. Analyses were conducted in both an unmatched cohort of 152,347 ever users and 19,523 never users and in 19,498 propensity score (PS)-matched pairs of ever and never users. Traditional Cox regression and Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the PS were used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results: New-onset hemorrhoid was diagnosed in 8,211 ever users and 2025 never users in the unmatched cohort and in 1,089 ever users and 2022 never users in the matched cohort. The hazard ratio for ever vs. never users derived from the traditional Cox regression was 0.464 (95% confidence interval: 0.440–0.488) in the unmatched cohort; and was 0.488 (0.453–0.525) in the matched cohort. In the IPTW models, the hazard ratio was 0.464 (0.442–0.487) in the unmatched cohort and was 0.492 (0.457–0.530) in the matched cohort. A dose-response pattern was observed while comparing the tertiles of cumulative duration, cumulative dose and defined daily dose of metformin therapy to never users in all analyses. A risk reduction of approximately 40–50% was consistently observed in various sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Chronic therapy with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a lower risk of hemorrhoid.