Thiazolidinedione Use Is Associated with a Borderline Lower Risk of Multiple Myeloma and a Significantly Lower Risk of Death in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Thiazolidinedione (TZD) exerts anti-proliferative effects on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. However, there has not been any human study investigating the risk of MM associated with TZD use.

METHODS

We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance database to identify 423,949 patients who had been newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between 1999 and 2005. After excluding ineligible patients, 86,999 pairs of patients with and without the use of TZD (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) that had been matched based on propensity score were selected for a follow-up for MM until 31 December 2011. The hazard ratios for MM were estimated using Cox regression and weighted using a propensity score.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.6 years and 4.7 years in ever users and never users of TZD, 32 and 47 cases were diagnosed with MM, respectively. A 35% lower risk (though not statistically significant) was observed among ever users (hazard ratio 0.652, 95% confidence interval: 0.416-1.023, p = 0.0625). When ever users were divided by the median (15 months) cumulative duration of TZD therapy, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for the lower and upper medians were 0.706 (0.394-1.264) and 0.603 (0.346-1.051), respectively. When treated as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio for every 1-month increment of the cumulative duration was 0.980 (95% confidence interval: 0.963-0.997, p = 0.0185). In the age subgroup analysis, a significantly lower risk could be seen in the older age subgroup of ≥65 years (hazard ratio 0.550, 95% confidence interval: 0.305-0.992, p = 0.0468). Additional analyses suggested that there were no interactions between TZD and some medications and between TZD and some clinical diagnoses, and that the use of TZD as a preventive drug for MM might not be cost-effective because a number-needed-to-treat of 5800 was too large. Survival analyses suggested that ever users had a significantly lower risk of death when all patients were analyzed (hazard ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.87, p < 0.0001 via a log-rank test) or when patients who developed MM were analyzed (hazard ratio: 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.86, p = 0.0153 via a log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

In Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, TZD use is associated with a borderline lower risk of MM, which is more remarkable in patients aged ≥65 years. Because of the low incidence of MM, the use of TZD for the prevention of MM may not be cost-effective. Patients who have been treated with TZD may have a survival advantage. Future research is required to confirm the findings.

Rosiglitazone has a null association with the risk of prostate cancer in type 2 diabetes patients

Background

This study investigated the risk of prostate cancer in ever users and never users of rosiglitazone in diabetes patients in Taiwan.

Methods

The nationwide database of the National Health Insurance was used to enroll male patients who had a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus at an age ≥ 25 years from 1999 to 2005. A total of 11,495 ever users and 11,495 never users of rosiglitazone matched on propensity score were selected and they were followed up for the incidence of prostate cancer from January 1, 2006 until December 31, 2011. Cox proportional hazard model incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results

At the end of follow-up, incident cases of prostate cancer were found in 84 never users and 90 ever users of rosiglitazone. The calculated incidence was 173.20 per 100,000 person-years in never users and was 187.59 per 100,000 person-years in ever users. The overall hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) for ever versus never users was 1.089 (0.808-1.466). The hazard ratios were 0.999 (0.643-1.552) for the first tertile (< 672 mg), 1.147 (0.770-1.709) for the second tertile (672-3584 mg) and 1.116 (0.735-1.695) for the third tertile (> 3584 mg) of cumulative dose. Sensitivity analyses consistently showed a null association between rosiglitazone and prostate cancer risk.

Conclusion

Rosiglitazone has a null effect on the risk of prostate cancer.

Rosiglitazone Does Not Affect the Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwanese Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Human studies on the effect of rosiglitazone on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are still lacking. We investigated whether rosiglitazone might affect IBD risk by using the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance to enroll a propensity-score-matched cohort of ever users and never users of rosiglitazone. The patients should have been newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between 1999 and 2006 and should have been alive on 1 January 2007. We then started to follow the patients from 1 January 2007 until 31 December 2011 for a new diagnosis of IBD. Propensity-score-weighted hazard ratios were estimated with regards to rosiglitazone exposure in terms of ever users versus never users and in terms of cumulative duration and cumulative dose of rosiglitazone therapy for dose-response analyses. The joint effects and interactions between rosiglitazone and risk factors of psoriasis/arthropathies, dorsopathies, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/tobacco abuse and the use of metformin were estimated by Cox regression after adjustment for all covariates. A total of 6226 ever users and 6226 never users were identified and the respective numbers of incident IBD were 95 and 111. When we compared the risk of IBD in ever users to that of the never users, the estimated hazard ratio (0.870, 95% confidence interval: 0.661-1.144) was not statistically significant. When cumulative duration and cumulative dose of rosiglitazone therapy were categorized by tertiles and hazard ratios were estimated by comparing the tertiles of rosiglitazone exposure to the never users, none of the hazard ratios reached statistical significance. In secondary analyses, rosiglitazone has a null association with Crohn's disease, but a potential benefit on ulcerative colitis (UC) could not be excluded. However, because of the low incidence of UC, we were not able to perform detailed dose-response analyses for UC. In the joint effect analyses, only the subgroup of psoriasis/arthropathies (-)/rosiglitazone (-) showed a significantly lower risk in comparison to the subgroup of psoriasis/arthropathies (+)/rosiglitazone (-). No interactions between rosiglitazone and the major risk factors or metformin use were observed. We concluded that rosiglitazone has a null effect on the risk of IBD, but the potential benefit on UC awaits further investigation.

Differential effects of metformin on immune-mediated and androgen-mediated non-cancer skin diseases in diabetes patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Metformin's effects on non-cancer skin diseases are rarely investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate immune-mediated (urticaria, allergic contact dermatitis and psoriasis) and androgen-mediated (acanthosis nigricans, hidradenitis suppurativa and acne) skin diseases associated with metformin use.

METHODS

Metformin initiators (n=234,585) and non-metformin initiators (n=125,921) within the initial 12 months of antidiabetic drugs prescription during 1999-2009 were followed up until December 31, 2011. Cox regression weighted for propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios for metformin initiators versus non-metformin initiators in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

For immune-mediated skin diseases, hazard ratios were 0.930 (95% confidence interval: 0.920-0.940) and 0.930 (0.918-0.943) in ITT and PP analyses, respectively; and the hazard ratios for each specific outcome were all significantly below unity. For androgen-mediated skin diseases, the ITT and PP hazard ratios were 1.110 (1.060-1.162) and 0.990 (0.935-1.048), respectively; and all hazard ratios were not significant for each specific outcome except for acne in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio: 1.116, 95% confidence interval: 1.064-1.170).

CONCLUSION

Metformin use is associated with a significantly lower risk of immune-mediated skin diseases but a lack of preventive effect on androgen-mediated skin diseases.

Metformin Reduces the Risk of Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of hearing loss with regard to metformin exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Taiwan's National Health Insurance database.

METHODS

We enrolled 292,071 ever users and 18,200 never users of metformin with new-onset diabetes mellitus from 1999 to 2005 and followed them for hearing loss from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2011. Hazard ratios (HRs) weighted by propensity score were estimated.

RESULTS

Hearing loss was newly diagnosed in 10,085 ever users and 1072 never users. Their respective incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) were 738.09 and 1366.83. The HR comparing ever-to-never users was 0.534 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.501-0.569]. The HR (95% CI) for the first (<27.07 months), second (27.07-59.13 months), and third (>59.13 months) tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy were 0.912 (0.852-0.975), 0.544 (0.508-0.582), and 0.275 (0.255-0.295), respectively; and were 0.900 (0.841-0.962), 0.531 (0.496-0.569), and 0.293 (0.273-0.315), respectively, for the first (<796.70 g), second (796.70-2020.15 g), and third (>2020.15 g) tertiles of cumulative dose. The magnitude of risk reduction became more remarkable in corresponding to the increasing tertiles of the defined daily dose prescribed. Subtype analyses suggested that the risk reduction was more significant for sensorineural than conductive hearing loss. Findings derived from a propensity score-matched cohort did not substantially change the conclusions, and the risk reduction for mixed hearing loss was not statistically significant in the matched cohort as significantly observed in the unmatched cohort.

CONCLUSION

The risk of hearing loss is reduced in a dose-response pattern in patients who use metformin.

Pioglitazone and Prostate Cancer Risk in Taiwanese Male Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study investigated prostate cancer risk associated with pioglitazone use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Taiwan's National Health Insurance database was used to create a propensity score-matched cohort of male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly diagnosed in 1999-2005 and aged ≥25 years at baseline. The matched cohort included 20437 ever users and 20437 never users of pioglitazone. The patients were followed up for the incidence of prostate cancer until December 31, 2011. Hazard ratios (HRs) were created from Cox regression weighted on propensity score.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 121 ever users of pioglitazone (incidence: 175.84 per 100,000 person-years) and 143 never users of pioglitazone (incidence: 216.66 per 100,000 person-years). When ever users were compared to never users of pioglitazone, the HR was 0.815 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.639-1.039; p=0.0987). When ever users were categorized into tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy (<6.83, 6.83-20.23, and >20.23 months), the HRs were 1.044 (95% CI, 0.741-1.471), 0.975 (95% CI, 0.690-1.377) and 0.539 (95% CI, 0.374-0.778), respectively. For the tertiles of cumulative dose of <5,040, 5,040-15,330, and >15,330 mg, the HRs were 1.008 (95% CI, 0.710-1.429), 1.090 (95% CI, 0.785-1.515) and 0.484 (95% CI, 0.330-0.711), respectively. A significantly lower risk associated with pioglitazone use could only be seen in patients aged <65 years (HR, 0.578; 95% CI, 0.360-0.927) but not in patients aged ≥65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly lower risk of prostate cancer is observed after a cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy for >20.23 months or a cumulative dose of >15,330 mg. The risk reduction is mainly observed in patients aged <65 years.

Effect of Metformin on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Male Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan

PURPOSE

This study investigated the risk of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) associated with metformin use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance to create 9,833 pairs of ever users and never users of metformin matched on propensity score. They were males with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes during 1999-2005. The incidence of LUTS/BPH was calculated from January 1, 2006 until December 31, 2011. We estimated hazard ratios by Cox regression weighted on propensity score.

RESULTS

There were 515 incident cases in ever users after a median follow-up of 5.4 years (incidence rate: 11.24 per 1,000 person-years) and 682 cases in never users after 5.2 years (15.92 per 1,000 person-years). The hazard ratio (HR) that compared ever to never users was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.78). The HRs that compared ever users categorized into quartiles of cumulative duration (<19.33, 19.33-41.56, 41.57-67.17, and >67.17 mo) to never users were 1.02 (0.84-1.23), 1.01 (0.86-1.20), 0.57 (0.47-0.69), and 0.40 (0.32-0.49), respectively. For the quartiles of cumulative dose of <582.00, 582.00-1,361.00, 1,361.01-2,449.00, and >2,449.00 g, the respective HRs were 1.03 (0.85-1.24), 0.96 (0.81-1.13), 0.60 (0.49-0.72), and 0.40 (0.32-0.50). The lower risk was significant in all quartiles of defined daily dose. However, a larger daily dose was associated with a greater risk reduction. There were no significant interactions between metformin and other antidiabetic drugs. Patients who used rosiglitazone and/or pioglitazone without metformin had a significantly higher risk (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.09-1.63) and a combination with metformin attenuated such an adverse impact (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly lower risk of LUTS/BPH is observed in males with type 2 diabetes who use metformin.

The Risk of Multiple Myeloma Is Reduced in Metformin Initiators: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Whether metformin might reduce the risk of multiple myeloma (MM) has not been extensively researched in humans.

METHODS

The study subjects were enrolled from the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance. A total of 739,553 patients who had a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999-2009 were identified. They were categorized as metformin initiators (metformin (+)) and non-metformin initiators (metformin (-)) based on the prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs that included metformin and did not include metformin within the initial 12 months, respectively. MM incidence was calculated after the initial 12 months of treatment group assignment until 31 December 2011. Hazard ratios based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) approaches were estimated by Cox regression weighted by propensity scores.

RESULTS

In the ITT analyses, the respective incidence rates for 497,248 metformin (+) and 242,305 metformin (-) were 9.97 and 14.33 per 100,000 person-years. The hazard ratio that compared metformin (+) to metformin (-) in the ITT analysis was 0.710 (95% confidence interval 0.593-0.850). In the PP analysis, the respective incidence rates were 5.14 and 13.98 per 100,000 person-years, and the hazard ratio was 0.355 (95% confidence interval, 0.270-0.466). The lower risk of MM among metformin (+) was supported by subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes patients who are initiated with metformin treatment have a significantly lower risk of MM, especially when they adhere to metformin treatment.

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 predicts negative remodeling and recovery of ejection fraction in acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is a recently identified phenotype of heart failure, which had lower rates of mortality, heart failure hospitalization, ventricular assist device placement, and heart transplantation compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Several predictors of HFrecEF had been proposed such as female gender, lower HF duration, nonischemic cause, no left bundle branch block (LBBB), lower EF, and lower N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the previous studies. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) was a biomarker that regulated the activity of metalloproteinases (MMPs). TIMP-1 was up-regulated during HF and was associated with ventricular remodeling and poor prognosis. However, the predictive value of TIMP-1 and MMP-9 in recovery of EF was yet to be investigated.

Purpose

The present study aimed at investigating the predictive value of TIMP-1 and MMP-9 of recovery of EF.

Methods

Subjects with acute decompensated heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were eligible for this study. HFrEF was defined as EF &lt;40% and HFrecEF was defined as follow-up EF ≥40% and ≥10% improvement from baseline EF. The biomarkers including NT-proBNP, plasma MMP-9 and serum TIMP-1 were measured in all enrolled subjects at admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden index were used to select the model variables and cutoff values. Binary logistic regression analysis assessed the association between the biomarkers and recovery ejection fraction.

Results

Among a total of 91 AHF with reduced ejection fraction subjects (70.1±16.2 years, baseline EF 28.9±7.6%), 19 (20.8%) HFrecEF and 72 (79.2%) persistent HFrEF were found at 6 months. TIMP-1 and NT-proBNP were significantly higher in persistent HFrEF compared to HFrecEF. MMP-9 was similar between these two phenotypes of HF. The area under the ROC curve for recovery of ejection fraction of TIMP-1, MMP-9 and NT-proBNP were 0.69, 0.52, and 0.65, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of TIMP-1 according to Youden index was 200.68 ng/ml. In binary logistic regression analysis, TIMP-1 was negatively correlated with recovered ejection fraction as continuous variables [per 1-SD=8.96 ng/ml, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.99 (0.98–1.00)] and categorical variables [cutoff value 200.68 ng/ml, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.16 (0.05–0.54)] after adjusting age, gender, EF, acute myocardial infarction, LBBB and NT-proBNP.

Conclusions

In AHF subjects with HFrEF, TIMP-1 was negatively correlated to the recovery of EF and could be a potential biomarker for the prediction of the recovery of EF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Metformin’s effects on varicocele, erectile dysfunction, infertility and prostate-related diseases: A retrospective cohort study

Objectives: To investigate the risk of varicocele, erectile dysfunction (ED), infertility, prostatitis, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer associated with metformin use.

Materials and methods: A total of 261,838 males, mean age 52.39 years (SD: 11.39), with a new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in 1999–2009 were identified from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Among them, 175,171 were metformin initiators [metformin (+)] and 86,667 were non-metformin initiators [metformin (−)] in the initial 12-month prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs. Follow-up started after the initial 12-month prescriptions. Outcomes were followed up until 31 December 2011. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) hazard ratios comparing metformin (+) to metformin (−) were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment-weighting using propensity scores.

Results: The median follow-up time ranged 5.55–6.82 years in metformin (−) and 4.36–5.17 years in metformin (+) for different outcomes in ITT analyses. The respective median follow-up time in PP analyses ranged 2.20–2.61 years in metformin (−) and ranged 3.99–4.65 years in metformin (+). In the ITT analyses, for metformin (−), the incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) of varicocele, ED, infertility, prostatitis, BPH and prostate cancer were 26.42, 455.89, 22.82, 590.23, 4226.19, and 141.69, respectively; and the respective incidence rates for metformin (+) were 25.65, 488.10, 32.60, 510.30, 3685.66, and 116.57. The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing metformin (+) to metformin (−) in the ITT analyses were 0.960 (0.784–1.174) for varicocele, 1.077 (1.026–1.130) for ED, 1.368 (1.116–1.676) for infertility, 0.887 (0.849–0.927) for prostatitis, 0.883 (0.868–0.899) for BPH and 0.878 (0.802–0.961) for prostate cancer. The hazard ratios for the respective outcomes in the PP analyses were 0.845 (0.662–1.078), 1.350 (1.264–1.441), 1.396 (1.078–1.808), 0.800 (0.756–0.846), 0.875 (0.855–0.895), and 0.613 (0.548–0.686).

Conclusion: Metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a neutral effect on varicocele, a higher risk of sexual dysfunction (ED and infertility) and a reduced risk of prostate-related health (prostatitis, BPH and prostate cancer).

Pioglitazone and breast cancer risk in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Whether pioglitazone may affect breast cancer risk in female diabetes patients is not conclusive and has not been investigated in the Asian populations.

Methods

The reimbursement database of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance was used to enroll an unmatched cohort and a propensity score-matched cohort of ever users and never users of pioglitazone in female patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes during 1999–2008. The patients were alive on January 1, 2009 and were followed up for breast cancer incidence until December 31, 2011. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for ever users and tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy versus never users, and for cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy treated as a continuous variable. Three models were created for the unmatched cohort and the matched cohort, respectively: 1) without adjustment for covariates; 2) after adjustment for covariates that differed with statistical significance (P-value < 0.05) between ever users and never users; and 3) after adjustment for all covariates.

Results

There were 174,233 never users and 6926 ever users in the unmatched cohort; and 6926 never users and 6926 ever users in the matched cohort. After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the numbers of incident breast cancer were 1044 in never users and 35 in ever users in the unmatched cohort and were 41 and 35, respectively, in the matched cohort. Hazard ratios suggested a null association between pioglitazone and breast cancer in all three models in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort. The overall hazard ratio after adjustment for all covariates was 0.758 (95% confidence interval: 0.539–1.065) in the unmatched cohort and was 0.824 (95% confidence interval: 0.524–1.296) in the matched cohort. None of the hazard ratios for the tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy and for the cumulative duration being treated as a continuous variable were statistically significant.

Conclusions

This study suggests a null association between pioglitazone and breast cancer risk in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, because of the small breast cancer cases and the limited follow-up time, further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Pioglitazone and Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Pioglitazone’s effect on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has rarely been studied.

Purpose

This retrospective observational study investigated whether the use of pioglitazone would affect the risk of COPD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients and Methods

The Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database was used to enroll 9487 matched pairs of ever users and never users of pioglitazone based on propensity score from a cohort of 350,536 patients. The enrolled patients had a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus between 1999 and 2008 and were not having a diagnosis of COPD before January 1, 2009. They were then followed up for COPD, starting from January 1, 2009 until December 31, 2011. Diagnosis of COPD was based on the codes of 491 for chronic bronchitis and 492 for emphysema based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios. The interactions between pioglitazone and COPD risk factors including pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis and tobacco abuse were also investigated.

Results

In 9487 never users and 9487 ever users of pioglitazone, the case numbers of incident COPD were 359 and 295, respectively. The respective incidence rates of COPD were 1484.73 and 1167.61 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for COPD that compared ever to never users was 0.778 (0.667–0.908). The hazard ratios for the tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy (cutoffs: <11.0, 11.0–19.6 and >19.6 months) to never users were 0.904 (0.729–1.121), 0.727 (0.578–0.914) and 0.715 (0.570–0.896), respectively. No interactions between pioglitazone and COPD risk factors including pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis and tobacco abuse were noted.

Conclusion

Pioglitazone use is associated with a significantly lower risk of COPD.

Metformin and risk of gingival/periodontal diseases in diabetes patients: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

To compare the risk of gingival and periodontal diseases (GPD) between ever users and never users of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The Taiwan's National Health Insurance database was used to enroll 423,949 patients with new onset diabetes mellitus from 1999 to 2005. After excluding ineligible patients, 60,309 ever users and 5578 never users were followed up for the incidence of GPD from January 1, 2006 until December 31, 2011. Propensity score-weighted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression.

RESULTS

GPD was newly diagnosed in 18,528 ever users (incidence: 7746.51 per 100,000 person-years) and 2283 never users (incidence: 12158.59 per 100,000 person-years). The hazard ratio that compared ever users to never users was 0.627 (95% confidence interval: 0.600-0.655). When metformin use was categorized by tertiles of cumulative duration and cumulative dose, the risk significantly reduced in a dose-response pattern when the cumulative duration reached approximately 2 years or the cumulative dose reached 670 grams. Analyses on the tertiles of defined daily dose of metformin showed that the reduction of GPD risk could be seen in all three subgroups but the benefit would be greater when the daily dose increased.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of metformin is associated with a significantly reduced risk of GPD.

Age of First Oral Health Examination and Dental Treatment Needs of Medicaid-Enrolled Children

INTRODUCTION

Early childhood caries (ECC), despite being preventable, remains the most prevalent disease of childhood, particularly in children between the ages of 2 and 5 y. The association between the type of health care provider completing initial oral health examinations and subsequent dental caries in children under 6 y of age is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study is to longitudinally assess the association between age at first oral health examination and provider type at first oral health examination on dental treatment for children under 6 y of age.

METHODS

Deidentified administrative claims data were used from the IBM Marketscan Multi-State Medicaid Database (n = 2.41 million Medicaid-enrolled children younger than 6 y in 13 states from 2012 to 2017). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to examine the association between age at first oral health examination and provider type with first treatment of dental caries at follow-up.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of dental caries for children whose first oral health examination at 4 y of age is 5.425 times higher than for children whose first oral health examination was before 1 y of age (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.371-5.479). The adjusted HR of dental caries for children seen by pediatric dentists (HR = 1.215; 95% CI, 1.207-1.223) and physicians (HR = 2.618; 95% CI, 2.601-2.635) was higher than those seen by a general dentist.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study highlight the importance of children having their first oral health examination no later than 12 mo of age in accordance with existing guidelines and referrals from physicians to prevent the need for invasive treatment.

KNOWLEDGE OF TRANSFER STATEMENT

Results of this study emphasize the need for a child's first oral health examination to be completed no later than 12 mo of age to prevent dental caries. Reinforcement and referrals by physicians based on this recommendation facilitate early establishment of a dental home in young children.

Metformin and primary bone cancer risk in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The effect of metformin on primary bone cancer risk has not been researched. This retrospective cohort study investigated the risk of primary bone cancer between metformin initiators and non-metformin initiators in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A total of 673,532 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and had been prescribed antidiabetic drugs for 2 or more times during 1999-2009 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance. Metformin initiators and non-metformin initiators were defined according to the prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs within the initial 12 months. The patients were then followed up until December 31, 2011 for the incidence of primary bone cancer. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment-weighting using propensity scores was used to estimate hazard ratios in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the respective incidence rates were 10.56 and 12.90 per 100,000 person-years in 453,532 metformin initiators and 220,000 non-metformin initiators and the hazard ratio for initiators versus non-initiators was 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.686-1.004, P-value = 0.0551). In the per-protocol analysis, the incidence rates were 7.58 and 11.77 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, and the hazard ratio was 0.615 (95% confidence interval 0.468-0.808, P-value = 0.0005). Subgroup analyses with regards to sex and age (<60 and ≥60 years) showed that the significantly lower risk associated with metformin use was only observed in men aged ≥60 years in the per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly lower risk of primary bone cancer can be observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who adhere to metformin treatment. This benefit can only be observed in men aged ≥60 years.

Metformin Reduces the Risk of Diverticula of Intestine in Taiwanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Aim: To investigate the risk of diverticula of intestine associated with metformin use. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Taiwan's National Health Insurance database to enroll 307,548 ever users and 18,839 never users of metformin. The patients were followed up starting on January 1, 2006 and ending on a date up to December 31, 2011. To address confounding by indication, hazard ratios were derived from Cox regression based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Results: During follow-up, newly diagnosed cases of diverticula were identified in 1,828 ever users (incidence rate: 125.59 per 100,000 person-years) and 223 never users (incidence rate: 268.17 per 100,000 person-years). Ever users had an approximately 54% lower risk, as shown by the overall hazard ratio of 0.464 (95% confidence interval 0.404-0.534). While patients categorized in each tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy were compared to never users, a dose-response pattern was observed with hazard ratios of 0.847 (0.730-0.983), 0.455 (0.391-0.531) and 0.216 (0.183-0.255) for the first (<27.37 months), second (27.37-59.70 months) and third (>59.70 months) tertiles, respectively. The findings were similar when the diagnosis of diverticula was restricted to the small intestine or to the colon. Subgroup analyses suggested that the lower risk of diverticula of intestine associated with metformin use was significant in all age groups of <50, 50-64 and ≥65 years, but the magnitude of risk reduction attenuated with increasing age. Conclusion: Metformin treatment is associated with a significantly reduced risk of diverticula of intestine.

Metformin Is Associated with a Lower Incidence of Benign Brain Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: The risk of benign brain tumors (BBT) associated with metformin use has not received much attention. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was designed to investigate such an association in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We used the database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance to enroll 152,176 ever users and 16,120 never users of metformin for the follow-up of incidence of BBT and a more specific outcome of cerebral meningioma. The patients were newly diagnosed with T2DM between 1999 and 2005; and they were followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Results: During follow-up, 111 never users and 557 ever users were diagnosed with BBT. For BBT, the respective incidence rates for never users and ever users were 153.95 per 100,000 person-years and 77.61 per 100,000 person-years. While ever users were compared to never users, the hazard ratio was 0.502 (95% confidence interval: 0.409-0.615). A dose-response pattern was seen when ever users were categorized into tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (cutoffs: <27.10 months, 27.10-58.27 months and >58.27 months) with respective hazard ratios of 0.910 (0.728-1.138), 0.475 (0.375-0.602) and 0.243 (0.187-0.315). For cerebral meningioma, the overall hazard ratio was 0.506 (0.317-0.808); and the hazard ratios comparing the respective tertiles to never users were 0.895 (0.531-1.508), 0.585 (0.346-0.988) and 0.196 (0.104-0.369). Conclusions: A reduced risk of BBT and cerebral meningioma is observed in metformin users in patients with T2DM.

Metformin and Risk of Malignant Brain Tumors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The risk of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use has rarely been investigated in humans. This retrospective cohort study investigated such an association. Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed from 1999 to 2005 in the nationwide database of Taiwan’s national health insurance were used to enroll study subjects. We first identified an unmatched cohort of 153,429 ever users and 16,222 never users of metformin. A cohort of 16,222 ever users and 16,222 never users matched on propensity score was then created from this unmatched cohort. All patients were followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. The incidence density was calculated and hazard ratios were derived from Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using a propensity score. The results showed that 27 never users and 155 ever users developed malignant brain tumors in the unmatched cohort. The incidence rate was 37.11 per 100,000 person-years in never users and 21.39 per 100,000 person-years in ever users. The overall hazard ratio comparing ever users versus never users was 0.574 (95% confidence interval: 0.381–0.863). The respective hazard ratios comparing the first (<27.13 months), second (27.13–58.33 months), and third (>58.33 months) tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy versus never users were 0.897 (0.567–1.421), 0.623 (0.395–0.984), and 0.316 (0.192–0.518). In the matched cohort, the overall hazard ratio was 0.317 (0.149–0.673) and the respective hazard ratios were 0.427 (0.129–1.412), 0.509 (0.196–1.322), and 0.087 (0.012–0.639) for the first, second, and third tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy. In conclusion, this study shows a risk reduction of malignant brain tumors associated with metformin use in a dose–response pattern. The risk reduction is more remarkable when metformin has been used for approximately 2–5 years.

The Relationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Gastric Cancer and the Potential Benefits of Metformin: An Extensive Review of the Literature

The objective of this review is to summarize the findings of published research that investigated the relationship between diabetes mellitus and gastric cancer (GCa) and the potential benefits of metformin on GCa. Related literature has been extensively reviewed, and findings from studies investigating the relationship between diabetes mellitus and GCa suggest that hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are closely related to the development of GCa. Although not supported by all, most observational studies suggest an increased risk of GCa in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in women and in Asian populations. Incidence of second primary malignancy diagnosed after GCa is significantly higher in diabetes patients. Diabetes patients with GCa may have more complications after gastrectomy or chemotherapy and they may have a poorer prognosis than patients with GCa but without diabetes mellitus. However, glycemic control may improve in the diabetes patients with GCa after receiving gastrectomy, especially after procedures that bypass the duodenum and proximal jejunum, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or Billroth II reconstruction. The potential links between diabetes mellitus and GCa may involve the interactions with shared risk factors (e.g., obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, high salt intake, smoking, etc.), Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, medications (e.g., insulin, metformin, statins, aspirin, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, etc.) and comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, vascular complications, heart failure, renal failure, etc.). With regards to the potential benefits of metformin on GCa, results of most observational studies suggest a reduced risk of GCa associated with metformin use in patients with T2DM, which can be supported by evidence derived from many in vitro and animal studies. Metformin use may also reduce the risk of HP infection, an important risk factor of GCa. In patients with GCa, metformin users may have improved survival and reduced recurrence. More studies are required to clarify the pathological subtypes/anatomical sites of GCa associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prevented by metformin, to confirm whether GCa risk can also be increased in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to explore the possible role of gastric microbiota in the development of GCa.

Metformin Use Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: The effect of metformin on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires confirmation. This retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of hospitalization for AF in ever and never users of metformin.

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999–2005 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. Analyses were conducted in both an unmatched cohort of 173,398 ever users and 21,666 never users and in a propensity score-matched cohort of 21,662 pairs of ever and never users. They were free from a diagnosis of AF before January 1, 2006 and were followed up until December 31, 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score.

Results: A total of 303 ever users and 86 never users in the unmatched cohort and 56 ever users and 86 never users in the matched cohort developed hospitalization for AF during follow-up. The respective incidence rates were 37.72 and 92.45 per 100,000 person-years in the unmatched cohort and were 56.98 and 92.46 per 100,000 person-years in the matched cohort. The hazard ratio for ever vs. never users was 0.405 (95% confidence interval: 0.319–0.515) in the unmatched cohort and 0.617 (0.441–0.864) in the matched cohort. Hazard ratios for the tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy vs. never users showed a dose-response effect. The findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for AF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Chronic Metformin Therapy is Associated with a Lower Risk of Hemorrhoid in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Metformin has anti-inflammatory property and reduces the risk of varicose vein in our previous study.

Aim: To investigate the risk of hemorrhoid, another common disease involving the hemorrhoidal venous plexus, in ever vs. never users of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999–2005 were enrolled from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. All patients who were alive on January 1, 2006 were followed up until December 31, 2011. Analyses were conducted in both an unmatched cohort of 152,347 ever users and 19,523 never users and in 19,498 propensity score (PS)-matched pairs of ever and never users. Traditional Cox regression and Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the PS were used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results: New-onset hemorrhoid was diagnosed in 8,211 ever users and 2025 never users in the unmatched cohort and in 1,089 ever users and 2022 never users in the matched cohort. The hazard ratio for ever vs. never users derived from the traditional Cox regression was 0.464 (95% confidence interval: 0.440–0.488) in the unmatched cohort; and was 0.488 (0.453–0.525) in the matched cohort. In the IPTW models, the hazard ratio was 0.464 (0.442–0.487) in the unmatched cohort and was 0.492 (0.457–0.530) in the matched cohort. A dose-response pattern was observed while comparing the tertiles of cumulative duration, cumulative dose and defined daily dose of metformin therapy to never users in all analyses. A risk reduction of approximately 40–50% was consistently observed in various sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Chronic therapy with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a lower risk of hemorrhoid.

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis/vertebral fracture in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the metformin effect on the risk of osteoporosis (OS) and/or vertebral fracture (VF).

METHODS

We enrolled 14 611 pairs of metformin ever and never users matched on propensity score (PS) from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. All patients had new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during 1999-2005 and were free from OS and/or any fracture at the start of follow-up on January 1, 2006. They were followed up until December 31, 2011 for the incidence of OS/VF. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using PS was used in the main analyses.

RESULTS

New-onset OS/VF was diagnosed in 1757 never users (median follow-up 5.0 years) and 1143 ever users (median follow-up 5.3 years). The respective incidence rates were 2870.97 and 1713.20 per 100 000 person-years. Two-thirds of the incident cases had OS without VF and the other third had VF. In main analyses, the hazard ratio for ever vs never users was 0.592 (95% CI: 0.550-0.638). In either sex, a dose-response pattern was noted and metformin therapy > 2 years was consistently associated with a lower risk. The protective effect attenuated with increasing age but remained significant in patients aged ≥ 80 years. In sensitivity analyses, metformin significantly reduced the risk of both OS and VF (with or without a prior OS) by 30-40%. Additional analyses showed a null association for other antidiabetic drugs, but significant interactions between metformin and insulin, sulfonylurea and pioglitazone, respectively, were noted.

CONCLUSION

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of OS/VF.

Metformin Use Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

AIM

Our aim was to compare the risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] between ever users and never users of metformin.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus from 1999 to 2005 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance. A total of 340 211 ever users and 24 478 never users who were free from IBD on January 1, 2006 were followed up until December 31, 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporating the inverse probability of treatment weighting using a propensity score.

RESULTS

New-onset IBD was diagnosed in 6466 ever users and 750 never users. The respective incidence rates were 412.0 and 741.3 per 100 000 person-years and the hazard ratio for ever vs never users was 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.60]. A dose-response pattern was observed while comparing the tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy to never users. The respective hazard ratios for the first [<26.0 months], second [26.0-58.3 months] and third [>58.3 months] tertiles were 1.00 [0.93-1.09], 0.57 [0.52-0.62] and 0.24 [0.22-0.26]. While patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs] without metformin were treated as a reference group, the hazard ratios for patients treated with OADs with metformin, with insulin without metformin [with/without other OADs] and with insulin and metformin [with/without other OADs] were 0.52 [0.42-0.66], 0.95 [0.76-1.20] and 0.50 [0.40-0.62], respectively.

CONCLUSION

A reduced risk of IBD is consistently observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have been treated with metformin.

Vildagliptin Has a Neutral Association With Dementia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Animal studies suggested that vildagliptin might exert a beneficial effect on cognitive function. The present study evaluated whether the use of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus might affect dementia risk.

METHODS

The database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance was used to enroll an unmatched cohort and a propensity score-matched-pair cohort of ever and never users of vildagliptin from patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus during 2002-2014. The patients should be alive on January 1, 2015 and were followed up for dementia diagnosis until December 31, 2016. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for vildagliptin ever versus never users, for cumulative duration and cumulative dose of vildagliptin therapy categorized into tertiles versus never users, and for cumulative duration and cumulative dose treated as continuous variables.

RESULTS

There were 355610 never users and 43196 ever users in the unmatched cohort and 40489 never users and 40489 ever users in the matched cohort. In the unmatched cohort, unadjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.929 (0.683-1.264) and the multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.922 (0.620-1.372). In the matched cohort, the unadjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.930 (0.616-1.402) and the multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.825 (0.498-1.367). None of the analyses conducted for cumulative duration and cumulative dose was significant, either being treated as tertile cutoffs or as continuous variables, in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a neutral effect of vildagliptin on dementia risk.

Use and effectiveness of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective study in Taiwan

Aims/Introduction

To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who initiated dapagliflozin in real-world practice in Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, adult patients with T2DM who initiated dapagliflozin after May 1^st 2016 either as add-on or switch therapy were included. Changes in clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Baseline factors associated with dapagliflozin response in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

A total of 1,960 patients were eligible. At 6 months, significant changes were observed: HbA1c by −0.73% (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.80, −0.67), body weight was -1.61 kg (95% CI −1.79, −1.42), and systolic/diastolic blood pressure by −3.6/−1.4 mmHg. Add-on dapagliflozin showed significantly greater HbA1c reduction (−0.82%) than switched therapy (−0.66%) (p = 0.002). The proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% target increased from 6% at baseline to 19% at Month 6. Almost 80% of patients experienced at least 1% reduction in HbA1c, and 65% of patients showed both weight loss and reduction in HbA1c. Around 37% of patients had at least 3% weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated patients with higher baseline HbA1c and those who initiated dapagliflozin as add-on therapy were associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c.

Conclusions

In this real-world study with the highest patient number of Chinese population to date, the use of dapagliflozin was associated with significant improvement in glycemic control, body weight, and blood pressure in patients with T2DM. Initiating dapagliflozin as add-on therapy showed better glycemic control than as switch therapy.

Metformin and Biliary Tract Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Aim

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus might reduce the risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC); and explored whether metformin use might affect the overall survival in patients who developed BTC.

Methods

New-onset type 2 diabetes patients aged 25–75 years during 1999–2005 were enrolled from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance and followed up until December 31, 2011. A total of 287,995 ever users and 16,229 never users were identified (unmatched original cohort) and a 1:1 matched pairs of 16,229 ever users and 16,229 never users based on propensity score (PS) were created (matched cohort). Hazard ratios were estimated by three Cox regression models: 1) adjusted for PS; 2) incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using PS; and 3) all covariates treated as independent variables. Overall survival was compared between ever users and never users of metformin who developed BTC.

Results

In the unmatched cohort, 73 never users and 523 ever users developed BTC, with respective incidence of 100.36 and 38.06 per 100,000 person-years. An overall risk reduction was observed in metformin users in all three regression models with respective hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.442 (0.344-0.568), 0.377 (0.295-0.481), and 0.477 (0.370-0.615). The tertile analyses showed a dose-response pattern with a neutral effect in the first tertile when metformin use was <2 years and a significant risk reduction in the second and third tertiles. Findings in the matched cohort were consistent with those observed in the unmatched cohort. The overall survival did not differ significantly between ever and never users of metformin among patients who developed BTC.

Conclusions

Metformin significantly reduces the overall risk of BTC by 50%–60%. A dose-response effect is observed and users of approximately 2 years show significantly reduced risk. However, metformin does not affect the overall survival in patients with BTC.

Dementia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Acarbose Use and Its Joint Effects with Metformin and Pioglitazone

This population-based retrospective cohort study investigated dementia risk associated with acarbose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database. A cohort of 15,524 matched pairs of ever and never users of acarbose based on propensity score matching was enrolled from new-onset type 2 diabetes patients from 1999 to 2006. Patients who were alive on January 1, 2007, were followed up for dementia until December 31, 2011. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. The results revealed that the incident case numbers (incidence rates) of dementia were 264 (407.19 per 100,000 person-years) for never users and 231 (337.94 per 100,000 person-years) for ever users. The hazard ratio for ever users versus never users was 0.841 (95% confidence interval, 0.704-1.005) and 0.918 (0.845-0.998) for every 1-year increment of cumulative duration of acarbose therapy. Subgroup analyses showed that the reduced risk associated with acarbose was only observed in women (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.783; 95% confidence interval, 0.618-0.992) and in non-users of metformin (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.635; 95% confidence interval, 0.481-0.837). A model comparing different combinations of acarbose, metformin, and pioglitazone suggested that users of all three drugs had the lowest risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 0.406; 95% confidence interval, 0.178-0.925). In conclusion, reduced risk of dementia associated with acarbose is observed in the female sex and in non-users of metformin. Moreover, users of all three drugs (acarbose, metformin, and pioglitazone) have the lowest risk of dementia.

Metformin reduces risk of varicose veins in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

This population-based retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of varicose veins in an unmatched cohort and a cohort of 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched pairs of ever and never users of metformin in type 2 diabetes patients.

METHODS

Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes during 1999 to 2005 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance and followed until December 31, 2011. Analyses were conducted in an unmatched cohort of 123 710 ever users and 15 095 never users and in 15 088 PS-matched pairs of ever users and never users. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the PS.

RESULTS

New-onset varicose veins were diagnosed in 126 never users and 633 ever users in the unmatched cohort and in 126 never users and 80 ever users in the matched cohort. The respective incidences were 191.36 and 110.04 per 100 000 person-years in the unmatched cohort and 191.41 and 115.81 per 100 000 person-years in the matched cohort. The hazard ratio for ever versus never users in the unmatched cohort was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.69) and was 0.60 (0.45-0.80) for the matched cohort. In the unmatched cohort, the hazard ratios for the first, second, and third tertiles of cumulative duration were 1.03 (0.83-1.28), 0.55 (0.44-0.69), and 0.29 (0.23-0.37), respectively. The respective hazard ratios in the matched cohort were 0.97 (0.65-1.43), 0.79 (0.55-1.15), and 0.24 (0.13-0.42).

CONCLUSION

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of varicose veins in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Sensory Symptoms in Diabetes Patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Diabetic sensory neuropathy has rarely been studied in the Asian populations. This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of sensory symptoms (SS) in the Taiwanese diabetes patients.

METHODS

A total of 1,400 diabetes patients received a health examination together with a structured questionnaire interview for three categories of abnormal sensation of numbness or tingling pain, electric shock, and skin thickness sensation on seven anatomical sites on upper limbs and six sites on lower limbs. Prevalence of SS was defined using nine different criteria, with the least stringent criterion of "any positive symptom on at least 1 site" and the most stringent criterion of "any positive symptom on at least bilateral and symmetrical 2 sites involving the lower limb." Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios and their 95% confidence interval for SS by the different definitions. Fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A_1c were entered in separate models to avoid hypercollinearity.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SS was 14.4 and 54.0% when using the most stringent and least stringent criterion, respectively. Women consistently had a significantly higher prevalence than men did. Among the three categories of symptoms, numbness or tingling pain was the most common, and fingers and toes were the most commonly involved anatomical sites. For any symptoms, 37.1% of the patients had any symptoms on the upper limbs and 41.7% had any symptoms on the lower limbs. Female sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A_1c, and hypertension were associated with SS in all models.

CONCLUSIONS

Taiwanese diabetes patients may have a high prevalence of SS if a structured questionnaire is used for screening. Female sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A_1c, and hypertension are associated with SS.

Metformin Use and Leukemia Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

The effect of metformin on leukemia risk remains unknown.

METHODS

The Taiwan's National Health Insurance database was used to enroll 610,089 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients on at least 2 anti-diabetic prescriptions during 1999-2009. We followed-up these patients until 31 December 2011, in order to determine the incidence of leukemia. We used Cox regression model (incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment-weighting using propensity scores) to estimate hazard ratios in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

We enrolled 414,783 metformin initiators and 195,306 non-metformin initiators. Among them, 598 and 372 patients developed new-onset leukemia after a median follow-up period of 5.08 years and 6.79 years, respectively. The respective incidence rates were 26.52 and 28.40 per 100,000 person-years. The hazard ratio for metformin initiators versus non-metformin initiators was 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.828-1.074) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0.852 (95% confidence interval 0.705-1.031) in the per-protocol analysis. Sensitivity analyses after excluding patients using the exclusion criteria (a follow-up duration < 24 and < 36 months, respectively, patients with incretin-based therapies during follow-up, and patients enrolled during 2 different periods of 1999-2003 and 2004-2009) consistently showed a neutral effect. However, metformin initiators had a significantly higher risk of leukemia in the per-protocol analyses when censoring patients at a time without regular follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Metformin use has an overall neutral effect on leukemia but we cannot exclude a significantly higher risk in patients who persistently use the drug.

Metformin Use Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background

A beneficial effect of metformin on heart failure requires confirmation.

Methods and Results

Patients with new‐onset type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999 to 2005 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database and followed up from January 1, 2006, until December 31, 2011. Main analyses were conducted in an unmatched cohort (172 542 metformin ever users and 43 744 never users) and a propensity score matched‐pair cohort (matched cohort I, 41 714 ever users and 41 714 never users). Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox hazard regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score in the unmatched cohort and by naïve method in the matched cohort I. Results showed that the respective incidence rates of heart failure hospitalization in ever users and never users were 304.25 and 864.31 per 100 000 person‐years in the unmatched cohort (hazard ratio, 0.350; 95% CI, 0.329–0.373) and were 469.66 and 817.01 per 100 000 person‐years in the matched cohort I (hazard ratio, 0.571; 95% CI, 0.526–0.620). A dose‐response pattern was consistently observed while estimating hazard ratios for the tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy. Findings were supported by another propensity score–matched cohort created after excluding 10 potential instrumental variables in the estimation of propensity score (matched cohort II). An approximately 40% lower risk was consistently observed among ever users in different models derived from the matched cohorts I and II, but models from the matched cohort II were less subject to model misspecification.

Conclusions

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of heart failure hospitalization.

P5006Metformin reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

A beneficial effect of metformin on heart failure requires confirmation.

Purpose

To investigate whether metformin might affect the risk of heart failure hospitalization in type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes during 1999–2005 were enrolled from the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance and followed until December 31, 2011. Analyses were conducted in a propensity score (PS) matched-pair cohort (42,367 ever users and 42,367 never users) and hazard ratios were estimated by Cox's hazard regression analysis incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the PS.

Results

A total of 1,592 never users and 987 ever users were hospitalized for heart failure for the first time during follow-up, with a respective incidence of 843.34 and 499.18 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio was 0.588 (95% confidence interval: 0.543–0.637), and the hazard ratios for the first (<29.13 months), second (29.13–61.63 months), and third (>61.63 months) tertiles of cumulative duration were 1.018 (0.914–1.135), 0.575 (0.511–0.647), and 0.340 (0.297–0.390), respectively. Sensitivity analyses conducted in an unmatched cohort before and after excluding patients who received an irregular refill of metformin or who were treated with incretin-based therapies during follow-up consistently supported such a protective effect of metformin on heart failure.

Conclusion

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The study was partly supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 107-2221-E-002-129-MY3) of Taiwan.

Metformin reduces risk of benign nodular goiter in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background Whether metformin might affect the risk of benign nodular goiter in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been investigated. Methods Patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999-2005 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. Analyses were conducted in a propensity score matched-pairs of 20,048 ever users and 20,048 never users of metformin. The patients were followed until December 31, 2011, for the incidence of benign nodular goiter. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score. Results Among the never users and ever users of metformin, 392 and 221 cases were diagnosed of benign nodular goiter during follow-up, with incidence of 457.88 and 242.45 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The overall hazard ratio for ever versus never users was 0.527 (95% confidence interval: 0.447-0.621). When cumulative duration of metformin therapy was divided into tertiles, the hazard ratios for the first (<25.3 months), second (25.3-57.3 months) and third (>57.3 months) tertiles were 0.815 (0.643-1.034), 0.648 (0.517-0.812) and 0.255 (0.187-0.348), respectively. Sensitivity analyses estimating the overall hazard ratios for patients enrolled in each specific year from 1999 to 2005 consistently showed a lower risk of benign nodular goiter among users of metformin. Conclusion Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of benign nodular goiter in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of uterine leiomyoma in female type 2 diabetes patients

BACKGROUND

Whether metformin may reduce the risk of uterine leiomyoma in type 2 diabetes patients has not been investigated. This retrospective cohort study compared the risk of uterine leiomyoma in ever versus never users of metformin.

METHODS

Female patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes during 1999-2005 were enrolled from the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance and followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. Analyses were conducted in a propensity score (PS) matched-pair cohort of 10,998 ever users and 10,998 never users of metformin. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the PS.

RESULTS

A total of 321 never users and 162 ever users developed uterine leiomyoma during follow up, with respective incidence of 704.65 and 329.82 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio was 0.467 (95% confidence interval: 0.387-0.564). The hazard ratios for the first (<23.3 months), second (23.3-53.1 months), and third (>53.1 months) tertiles of cumulative duration were 0.881 (0.685-1.132), 0.485 (0.367-0.642), and 0.198 (0.134-0.291), respectively; and were 0.751 (0.576-0.980), 0.477 (0.360-0.632), and 0.277 (0.198-0.386), respectively, for the first (<655,000 mg), second 655,000-1,725,500 mg), and third (>1,725,500) tertiles of cumulative dose. Sensitivity analyses after excluding users of sulfonylurea, users of estrogen, users of insulin, users of incretin-based therapies during follow up, patients with irregular drug refills, patients who discontinued the use of metformin, patients who received metformin prescription less than four times, or redefining uterine leiomyoma by using 'diagnostic code' plus 'procedure codes' consistently supported a lower risk of uterine leiomyoma in ever users of metformin.

CONCLUSION

Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of uterine leiomyoma.

Human Insulin Therapy Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Whether human insulin may affect lung cancer risk requires investigation. Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus from 1996 to 2009 were enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance. An entry date was set on January 1, 2004, and 1,007,617 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed before 2004 were followed up for new-onset lung cancer until December 31, 2009. Incidence rates of lung cancer for never-users, ever-users, and tertiles of three dose-response exposure parameters (i.e., time since starting insulin, cumulative dose, and cumulative duration) were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. The joint effect of insulin and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was also evaluated. Results: There were 156,720 ever-users and 850,897 never-users. The respective case numbers of incident lung cancer were 3,007 (1.92%) and 13,677 (1.61%), and the respective incidence rates were 424.45 and 313.60 per 100,000 person-years. The adjusted hazard ratio comparing ever-users vs. never-users was 1.545 (95% confidence interval: 1.478-1.614). The hazard ratios for the different subgroups of the three dose-response parameters all suggested a significantly higher risk of lung cancer associated with insulin use (P trend < 0.0001). Compared to patients without insulin use and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, insulin users who also had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had the highest risk of lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.891, 95% confidence interval: 1.767-2.024). Conclusions: This study suggests a significant association between human insulin use and lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Metformin and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Whether metformin may reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk requires confirmation.

METHODS

Type 2 diabetes patients newly diagnosed during 1999-2005 and with 2 or more prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs were enrolled from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. A total of 173 917 ever-users and 21 900 never-users of metformin were identified (unmatched cohort). A 1:1 matched-pair cohort of 21 900 ever-users and 21 900 never-users based on a propensity score (PS) was created. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using the PS. In addition, interactions with aspirin and statin were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort, 619 never-users and 2642 ever-users developed HCC, with a respective incidence of 668.0 and 330.7 per 100 000 person-years and an overall hazard ratio of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.54). The hazard ratios for the first (<25.7 months), second (25.7-56.9 months) and third (>56.9 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy were 0.89 (0.81-0.98), 0.50 (0.46-0.56) and 0.23 (0.21-0.26) respectively. Analyses of the matched cohort showed an overall hazard ratio of 0.76 (0.67-0.85), and the hazard ratios for the respective tertiles were 1.39 (1.19-1.62), 0.77 (0.65-0.91) and 0.37 (0.30-0.45). Aspirin and statin were observed to have a significant interaction with metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin was associated with a reduced risk of HCC in a dose-response pattern. Users of both metformin and aspirin or metformin and statin had the lowest risk.

Pioglitazone Reduces Dementia Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of pioglitazone on dementia requires confirmation.

METHODS

The database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance was used to enroll a propensity score-matched-pair cohort of patients who had ever used pioglitazone and patients who had never used pioglitazone from Taiwanese patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus during 1999⁻2008. The patients were to be alive on 1 January 2009 and were followed up for dementia until 31 December 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 11,011 never users and 11,011 ever users of pioglitazone, with respective numbers of incident dementia of 123 and 91. The overall hazard ratio was 0.716 (95% confidence interval: 0.545⁻0.940) for ever users versus never users. The hazard ratios for the first (<11.0 months), second (11.0⁻19.6 months) and third (>19.6 months) tertiles of cumulative duration were 0.806 (0.544⁻1.193), 0.654 (0.430⁻0.994) and 0.694 (0.469⁻1.026), respectively. When cumulative duration was treated as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio was 0.987 (0.976⁻0.998). In subgroup analyses, the beneficial effect was mainly observed in patients who had not been treated with metformin. Among metformin ever users, the hazard ratio for dementia for pioglitazone ever users versus never users was 0.802 (0.580⁻1.109); and was 0.494 (0.284⁻0.857) among never users of metformin. No interaction between pioglitazone and major risk factors of dementia (i.e., stroke, hypoglycemia, head injury and Parkinson's disease) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone use is associated with a lower risk of dementia, especially when it is used in never users of metformin and has been used for more than 20 months.

Metformin and risk of developing nasopharyngeal cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin has anticancer effects, but whether it can reduce the risk of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is not known.

METHODS

A total of 15,486 ever-users and 15,486 never-users of metformin matched by propensity score were enrolled from among patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the period 1999-2005 and who were found in the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance. The patients were followed until December 31, 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores.

RESULTS

NPC incidence was 33.41 and 106.04 per 100,000 person-years in ever-users and never-users, respectively. The overall hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.312 (0.197-0.494) favored a significantly lower risk among metformin ever-users than in never-users. Hazard ratios comparing the first (<26.03 months), second (26.03-58.03 months) and third (>58.03 months) tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin use to never-users were 0.690 (0.389-1.224), 0.187 (0.076-0.463) and 0.168 (0.068-0.415), respectively. A significantly lower risk of NPC was consistently observed among metformin users in subgroup analyses of age (<50 years and ≥50 years), sex (men and women), and patients with or without nephropathy, liver diseases or diseases of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use is associated with a significantly lower risk of NPC.

Metformin and Risk of Hypertension in Taiwanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Whether metformin use may reduce hypertension risk has not been studied. This study investigated such possibility in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods and Results

Newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999–2005 were enrolled from the reimbursement database of the Taiwan's National Health Insurance and followed to December 31, 2011. Hypertension was defined either by a diagnosis or by a diagnosis plus the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and/or calcium channel blockers. Analyses were conducted in a propensity score matched‐pair cohort of 4810 ever users and 4810 never users. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios. Results showed that when hypertension was defined by a diagnosis, 2261 never users and 1908 ever users developed hypertension. The overall hazard ratio was 0.724 (0.681–0.769) and the hazard ratios for the first (<2.0 months), second (2.0–13.0 months) and third (>13.0 months) tertiles of cumulative duration were 0.820 (0.745–0.903), 0.692 (0.634–0.756), and 0.687 (0.630–0.749), respectively. When cumulative duration of metformin therapy was treated as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio was 0.991 (0.989–0.994) for every 1‐month increment of metformin use. When hypertension was defined by a diagnosis plus the use of antihypertensive drugs, the overall hazard ratio was 0.831 (0.771–0.895), the hazard ratios for the respective tertiles were 0.868 (0.769–0.980), 0.852 (0.767–0.946), and 0.787 (0.709–0.874), and the hazard ratio was 0.994 (0.991–0.997) for every 1‐month increment of metformin use.

Conclusions

A reduced risk of hypertension is observed in metformin users in a dose‐response pattern.

Metformin and lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study evaluated whether metformin might reduce lung cancer risk. The reimbursement database of the Taiwan's National Health Insurance was used. A sample of 15414 never users and 280159 ever users of metformin (original sample) and a 1:1 matched-pairs of ever and never users (n=15414 in each group, matched sample) were recruited from patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus during 1999-2005. They were followed until December 31, 2011. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios. Results showed that the respective incidence of lung cancer in ever and never users was 173.36 and 292.65 per 100000 person-years in the original sample; and was 211.71 and 292.65, respectively, in the matched sample. The overall hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.586 (0.509-0.674) in the original sample and 0.717 (0.584-0.881) in the matched sample suggested a significantly lower risk among metformin users. Hazard ratios comparing the first (<22.60 months), second (22.60-46.67 months) and third (>46.67 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin use to never users was 1.163 (1.005-1.348), 0.612 (0.526-0.711) and 0.176 (0.148-0.210), respectively, in the original sample; and was 1.465 (1.131-1.897), 0.758 (0.566-1.016) and 0.228 (1.460-0.357) in the respective tertile of the matched sample. Sensitivity analyses after excluding patients with certain risk factors of cancer and subgroup analyses supported a favorable effect of metformin. In conclusion, metformin use may reduce lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sitagliptin and heart failure hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes

This study evaluated the risk of heart failure hospitalization in a 1:1 matched pair sample of sitagliptin ever and never users derived from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance. A total of 85,859 ever users and 85,859 never users matched on 8 digits of propensity score were followed for the first event of heart failure hospitalization until December 31, 2011. The treatment effect (for ever versus never users, and for tertiles of cumulative duration of therapy) was estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Additionally, adjusted hazard ratios for heart failure were estimated for the baseline characteristics in sitagliptin ever users. Results showed that the incidence of heart failure hospitalization was 1,020.16 and 832.54 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, for ever and never users, with an overall hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) of 1.262 (1.167-1.364). While compared to never users, the respective hazard ratio for the first, second, and third tertile of cumulative duration < 3.7, 3.7-10.3 and >10.3 months was 2.721 (2.449-3.023), 1.472 (1.318-1.645) and 0.515 (0.447-0.594). Older age, longer diabetes duration, male sex, and use of insulin, sulfonylurea, calcium channel blockers, aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel and dipyridamole were significantly associated with a higher risk in sitagliptin users, but dyslipidemia and use of metformin and statin were protective. In conclusion, sitagliptin increases the risk of heart failure hospitalization within one year of its use, but reduces the risk thereafter. Some factors predisposing to sitagliptin-related heart failure are worthy of attention in clinical practice.

Attitudes and potential barriers towards hepatitis C treatment in patients with and without HIV coinfection

This study aimed to assess attitudes and potential barriers towards treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, comparing those with and without HIV coinfection. A cross-sectional survey of 82 HCV-infected adults with and without HIV was conducted in greater Los Angeles between November 2013 and July 2015. Overall, there were 53 (64.6%) with HIV coinfection, 20 (25.0%) with self-reported cirrhosis, and 22 (26.8%) with a history of prior HCV treatment. Of all, 93.2% wanted HCV treatment, but 45.9% were unwilling/unable to spend anything out of pocket, 29.4% were waiting for new therapies, and 23.5% were recommended to defer HCV treatment. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were more likely to want treatment within one year (90.2% versus 68.2%, p = 0.02), more willing to join a clinical trial (74.5% versus 8.0%, p < 0.01), more willing to take medications twice daily (86.3% versus 61.5%, p = 0.01), and more likely to prefer hepatitis C treatment by an infectious diseases/HIV physician (36.7% versus 4.0%, p < 0.01). Of all, 77.1% of coinfected patients were willing to change antiretroviral therapy if necessary to treat HCV, but only 48.0% of patients were willing to take a medication if it had not been studied in HIV-positive patients. Treatment preferences differ between HIV/HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. Despite a strong willingness among the study cohort to start HCV treatment, other factors such as cost, access to medications, and provider reluctance may be delaying treatment initiation.

Metformin use and cervical cancer risk in female patients with type 2 diabetes

This study evaluated whether metformin may affect the risk of cervical cancer. The reimbursement databases of the Taiwan's National Health Insurance were used. Female patients with type 2 diabetes at an onset age of 25-74 years during 1999-2005 and newly treated with metformin (n=132971, "ever users of metformin") or other antidiabetic drugs (n=6940, "never users of metformin") were followed for at least 6 months until December 31, 2011. The treatment effect of metformin (for ever versus never users, and for tertiles of cumulative duration of therapy) was estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Analyses were also conducted in a 1:1 matched pair cohort based on 8 digits of propensity score. Results showed that the respective numbers of incident cervical cancer in ever users and never users were 438 (0.33%) and 38 (0.55%), with respective incidences of 68.29 and 121.38 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio suggested a significantly lower risk in metformin users (0.558, 95% confidence intervals: 0.401-0.778). In tertile analyses, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the first (<23.0 months), second (23.0-47.9 months) and third (>47.9 months) tertile of cumulative duration were 1.272 (0.904-1.790), 0.523 (0.366-0.747) and 0.109 (0.070-0.172), respectively. Findings were supported by the analyses in the matched cohort. In conclusion, metformin may significantly reduce the risk of cervical cancer, especially when the cumulative duration is more than 2 years.

Sitagliptin use and thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes

Whether sitagliptin may increase thyroid cancer risk has not been investigated in the Asian populations. This study evaluated the association in Taiwanese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes from 1999 to 2008 by using the reimbursement database of the National Health Insurance. They should have been followed for at least 6 months after March 1, 2009, the date when sitagliptin was approved for reimbursement. Patients newly treated with sitagliptin (n=58238, "ever users of sitagliptin") or other antidiabetic drugs (n =312853, "never users of sitagliptin") were followed until December 31, 2011. The treatment effect (for ever versus never users, and for tertiles of cumulative duration of therapy) was estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Results showed that the respective number of incident thyroid cancer in ever users and never users was 28 and 172, with respective incidence of 29.34 and 22.13 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.516 (1.011-2.271) suggested a significantly higher risk associated with sitagliptin use. In tertile analyses, the hazard ratio for the first ( < 6.53 months), second (6.53-14.00 months) and third ( > 14 months) tertile of cumulative duration was 1.995 (1.015-3.919), 2.516 (1.451-4.364) and 0.595 (0.244-1.449), respectively. Analyses after excluding patients with benign thyroid disease and in a subsample matched on baseline characteristics supported the findings in the original sample. In conclusion, sitagliptin use is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer, especially during the first year of its treatment.

Metformin and esophageal cancer risk in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study evaluated whether metformin might reduce esophageal cancer risk. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed during 1999–2005 were recruited from the reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance. Those newly treated with metformin (n = 288013, “ever users of metformin”) or other antidiabetic drugs (n = 16216, “never users of metformin”) were followed until December 31, 2011. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in a matched-pair sample of 16216 never users and 16216 ever users. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. The risk associated with infection of Helicobacter pylori, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus was also evaluated. Results showed that the incidence of esophageal cancer in ever and never users was 25.03 and 50.87 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The overall hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) of 0.487 (0.347–0.684) suggested a significantly lower risk among metformin users. Hazard ratios comparing the first (< 21.47 months), second (21.47–46.00 months) and third (> 46.00 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin use to never users was 1.184 (0.834–1.680), 0.403 (0.276–0.588) and 0.113 (0.071–0.179), respectively. Infection of Helicobacter pylori (but not the other viral infections) significantly increased the risk, which could be ameliorated by metformin. Analyses in the matched sample consistently supported a protective role of metformin. In conclusion, metformin reduces esophageal cancer risk when the cumulative duration is more than approximately 2 years.

Abstract 2296: Metformin reduces colon cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background: The effect of metformin on colon cancer is rarely investigated in Asian populations.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes during 1999-2005 were recruited from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. A 1:1 propensity score matched-pair sample of 16314 ever users and 16314 never users of metformin were followed until December 31, 2011. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results: The incidence of colon cancer was 272.04 and 392.44 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, in ever and never users. The overall hazard ratio (0.691, 95% confidence interval: 0.578-0.826) suggested a significantly lower risk in metformin users. While compared to never users, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the first (&lt;20.00 months), second (20.00-45.20 months) and third (&gt;45.20 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy was 1.455 (1.165-1.816), 0.683 (0.526-0.885) and 0.224 (0.152-0.331), respectively. The protective effect of metformin on colon cancer was not affected by the use of aspirin and statin or the infection of Helicobacter pylori in additional analyses.

Conclusions: Metformin reduces colon cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. The protective effect is more remarkable when the cumulative duration is more than 20 months.

Citation Format: Chin-Hsiao Tseng. Metformin reduces colon cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2296. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2296

Sitagliptin and oral cancer risk in type 2 diabetes patients

The reimbursement database of the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance was used to evaluate oral cancer risk after sitagliptin use. Patients newly diagnosed of type 2 diabetes during 1999–2008 were recruited. A 1:1 propensity score matched-pair sample of 39195 ever users and 39195 never users were followed up until December 31, 2011. Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was used to estimate hazard ratios. Results showed that the overall hazard ratio was not statistically significant (0.956, 95% confidence interval: 0.652–1.401). However, in tertile analyses, the hazard ratio for the first (< 7.47 months), second (7.47–15.63 months) and third (> 15.63 months) tertile of cumulative duration was 1.563 (0.963–2.537), 1.236 (0.738–2.071) and 0.345 (0.164–0.725), respectively; and was 1.575 (0.963–2.575), 1.224 (0.738–2.033) and 0.347 (0.165–0.731), respectively, for the first (< 19,600 mg), second (19,600–42,200 mg) and third (> 42,200 mg) tertile of cumulative dose. Sensitivity analyses after excluding patients who developed any other cancer during follow-up did not change the results substantially. Additionally, the risk of oral diseases that may predispose to oral cancer (i.e., “gingival and periodontal diseases" and/or "oral mucosal lesions") paralleled the risk pattern of oral cancer, suggesting a possible explanation for the risk change of oral cancer related to sitagliptin. In conclusion, sitagliptin may reduce oral cancer risk when the cumulative duration is > 15.63 months or the cumulative dose is > 42,200 mg.