A new declaration for feet's sake: Halving the global diabetic foot disease burden from 2% to 1% with next generation care

Best practice offloading treatments for diabetic foot ulcer healing, remission, and better plans for the healing-remission transition

Diabetes-related foot disease is arguably the world's least known major health problem and causes a disease burden larger than most well-known diseases, such as stroke and breast cancer. This burden is driven by people developing more severe stages of foot disease, such as foot ulcers and infections, and with that worsening quality of life. To reduce this burden, we need treatments that prevent more severe stages of foot disease and improve quality of life. Best practice offloading treatments have been found to be arguably the most effective existing treatments to heal and prevent diabetes-related foot ulcers and infections, but can worsen quality of life. Furthermore, high re-ulceration rates still occur with best practice offloading treatments after healing. This may be because of the gap in guideline recommendations on the transition from ulcer healing to ulcer remission when it comes to offloading treatments. In this paper, we review why we need offloading treatments and what are the best offloading treatments recommended by the latest international guidelines for healing and remission. Further, we propose plans for future best practice offloading treatments for the transition from healing-to-remission to help reduce re-ulceration rates and improve longer-term ulcer remission. These plans could be the catalyst for better transitioning patients from first ulcer presentation through healing and into long-term remission, and in turn delivering better quality of life, and lower diabetes-related foot disease burdens on patients, nations, and the globe in future.

Assessment of the diabetic foot in inpatients

Diabetic foot disease is a severe complication of diabetes, leading to significant morbidity and lower limb amputations. This review explores the pathophysiology of diabetic foot disease, highlighting the roles of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease and immunosuppression in the development of foot ulcers and infections. Key intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors, including long-standing diabetes, poor glycaemic control, inappropriate footwear and trauma are discussed. The importance of comprehensive diabetic foot assessments using diagnostic tools such as the Ipswich Touch Test and Doppler studies is emphasised for early detection and management. Challenges such as delays in referral to specialist care, limited access to multidisciplinary foot teams, and staffing shortages are identified as critical barriers to effective care. The review builds upon extant literature by integrating the most recent evidence, including the 2023 guidelines from the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. It emphasises practical application, detailed referral pathways and multidisciplinary care strategies, offering updated tools and insights to improve clinical outcomes and address the often overlooked aspects within inpatient services. Future directions encompass advances in imaging, telemedicine and patient education, which may further optimise preventive and therapeutic strategies for diabetic foot disease.

In vitro evaluation of silver-zinc oxide-eugenol nanocomposite for enhanced antimicrobial and wound healing applications in diabetic conditions

Diabetic wounds with chronic infections present a significant challenge, exacerbated by the growing issue of antimicrobial resistance, which often leads to delayed healing and increased morbidity. This study introduces a novel silver-zinc oxide-eugenol (Ag+ZnO+EU) nanocomposite, specifically designed to enhance antimicrobial activity and promote wound healing. The nanocomposite was thoroughly characterized using advanced analytical techniques, confirming its nanoscale structure, stability and chemical composition. The Ag+ZnO+EU nanocomposite demonstrated potent antimicrobial efficacy against a range of wound associated pathogens, including standard and clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Ag+ZnO+EU for standard and clinical isolates were significantly lower than those of the individual components, highlighting the synergistic effect of the nanocomposite. Time-kill assays revealed rapid microbial eradication, achieving complete sterility within 240-min. Importantly, the nanocomposite effectively eliminated persister-like cells, which are typically resistant to conventional treatments, suggesting a potential solution for persistent infections. In vitro scratch assays using human keratinocyte cells demonstrated that the Ag+ZnO+EU nanocomposite significantly accelerated wound closure, with near-complete healing observed within 24-h, indicating enhanced cell migration and tissue regeneration. Additionally, the nanocomposite showed potential antidiabetic effects by increasing glucose uptake up to 97.21% in an in vitro assay using 2-[N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl) amino]-2-deoxy-D-glucose, a fluorescent glucose analog, suggesting potential applications beyond wound healing. These findings highlight the Ag+ZnO+EU nanocomposite as a promising candidate for addressing both antimicrobial resistance and impaired wound healing in diabetic contexts.

Lower limb gait joint coordination variability in people with diabetes-related foot ulcers

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-related foot ulcers pose substantial health risks globally, yet the biomechanical intricacies underlying their development remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate lower limb gait joint coordination variability in individuals with diabetes-related foot ulcers compared to those with diabetes (without diabetes-related foot ulcers) and healthy controls.

METHODS

A total of 99 participants (diabetes-related foot ulcers cases - 16, Diabetes controls - 50, Health controls - 33) compared three self-paced walking trials. Vector coding, a technique quantifying movement coordination, was employed, analysing hip-knee, knee-ankle, and hip-angle joint couplings in the sagittal plane.

FINDINGS

No significant differences in coordination variability were found among the groups. However, distinct coupling pattern frequencies emerged, with diabetes-related foot ulcers cases exhibiting unique anti-phase hip and ankle coupling frequency counts compared to healthy controls.

INTERPRETATION

These findings challenge conventional understandings of diabetes-related foot ulcers biomechanics and underscore the complexity of gait in this population.

Predictors of post-healing recurrence in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most prevalent, serious, and costly consequences of diabetes, often associated with peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. These ulcers contribute to high disability and mortality rates in patients and pose a major challenge to clinical management.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the risk prediction models for post-healing recurrence in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients, so as to provide a reference for clinical staff to choose appropriate prediction models.

METHODS

The authors searched five databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Database) from their inception to September 23, 2023, for relevant literature. After data extraction, the quality of the literature was evaluated using the Predictive Model Research Bias Risk and Suitability Assessment tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies involving 5956 patients were included. The recurrence rate after DFU healing ranged from 6.2 % to 41.4 %. Nine studies established 15 risk prediction models, and the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.660 to 0.940, of which 12 models had an AUC≥0.7, indicating good prediction performance. The combined AUC value of the 9 validation models was 0.83 (95 % confidence interval: 0.79-0.88). Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed for 10 models, external validation for 5 models, and internal validation for 6 models. Meta-analysis showed that 14 predictors, such as age and living alone, could predict post-healing recurrence in DFU patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To enhance the quality of these risk prediction models, there is potential for future improvements in terms of follow-up duration, model calibration, and validation processes.

The Association of HbA1c Variability with 12 Week and 12 Month Outcomes on Diabetes Related Foot Ulcer Healing

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the relationship between HbA1c variability and foot ulcer healing at 12 weeks and 12 months.

METHODS

Using National Diabetic Foot Care Audit (NDFA) and hospital records, demographics, baseline ulcer characteristics and healing outcomes for subjects presenting with a foot ulcer between 2017-2022 were collected at 12 weeks and 12 months. Subjects had diabetes duration > 3 years and ≥ 3 HbA1c recordings in the 5 years prior to presentation.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, factors associated with an active ulcer were presence on hind foot (adjusted odds ratios) (2.1 [95% CI 1.3-3.7]), ischaemia (2.1 [95% CI:1.4-3.2]), area > 1 cm2 (2.7 [95% CI:1.7-4.2]) and diabetes duration > 24 years vs 3-10 (AOR 2.0 [95% CI 1.2-3.5]). After adjustment, HbA1c variability 6-10 mmol/mol and > 14.5 mmol/mol had AOR of 1.76 (95% CI 1.1-2.8; p = 0.0192) and 1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.6; p = 0.1148) of an active ulcer at 12 weeks vs variability < 6 mmol/mol. At 12 months, ischaemia (AOR 2.4 [95% CI 1.5-3.8]) and diabetes duration > 24 years vs 3-10 years (AOR 3.3 [95% CI 1.7-6.4] were significant factors. HbA1c variability was not significant at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

In keeping with the national NDFA data, in our cohort ulcer characteristics, but not HbA1c variability, were the key factors associated with ulcer healing at 12 weeks and 12 months.

Effectiveness of autologous mononuclear cells as adjuvant therapy in patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers receiving indirect lower limb revascularization

AIM

The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) therapy for patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated through indirect revascularization.

METHODS

The study is a prospective non-controlled observational study including patients with neuro-ischaemic DFUs who received indirect peripheral revascularization and showed a persistence of wound ischaemia defined by the absence of angiographic collateral vessels and TcPO2 values < 30 mmHg in the wound angiosome area. All patients received 3 cycles of PB-MNCs therapy administered along the wound related artery based on the angiosome theory. The primary outcomes measures were healing, major amputation, and survival after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary outcomes measures were the evaluation of tissue perfusion by TcPO2 and foot pain defined by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

RESULTS

Overall 52 (9.7%) patients were included. Most patients were aged (> 70 years), all of them were affected by Type 2 Diabetes with a long diabetes duration (> 20 years). Almost 80% were assessed as grade 2D- 3D of Texas University Classification. Forty-four patients (84.6%) patients healed and survived, 2 (3.85%) healed and deceased, 2 (3.85%) not healed and deceased, 4 (7.7%) not healed and survived. No major amputations were recorded. A significant increase of TcPO2 after PB-MNCs therapy were recorded in comparison to the baseline (43 ± 9 vs 18 ± 8 mmHg, p < 0.0001), such as a concomitant reduction of foot pain (1.8 ± 1.2 vs 6.2 ± 2.1, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PB-MNCs resulted effective to promote wound healing and limb salvage in diabetic patients with ischaemic DFUs who received indirect revascularization.

Advances in nucleic acid delivery strategies for diabetic wound therapy

In recent years, the prevalence of diabetic wounds has significantly increased, posing a substantial medical challenge due to their propensity for infection and delayed healing. These wounds not only increase mortality rates but also lead to amputations and severe mobility issues. To address this, advancements in bioactive molecules such as genes, growth factors, proteins, peptides, stem cells, and exosomes into targeted gene therapies have emerged as a preferred strategy among researchers. Additionally, the integration of photothermal therapy (PTT), nucleic acid, and gene therapy, along with 3D printing technology and the layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly approach, shows promise in diabetic wound treatment. Effective delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) relies on gene vectors. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the pathophysiological characteristics observed in diabetic wounds, encompassing diminished angiogenesis, heightened levels of reactive oxygen species, and impaired immune function. It further examines advancements in nucleic acid delivery, targeted gene therapy, advanced drug delivery systems, layer-by-layer (LBL) techniques, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), 3D printing, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and ongoing clinical trials. Through the integration of recent research insights, this review presents innovative strategies aimed at augmenting the multifaceted management of diabetic wounds, thus paving the way for enhanced therapeutic outcomes in the future.

Prevalence and incidence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, foot disease, and lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes in Ireland; a systematic review protocol

Introduction

Internationally, the prevalence of diabetes is increasing, and with this comes an increase in diabetes related complications. Diabetic foot disease is the most common lower extremity complication in people with diabetes causing 2% of the global disease burden. It, is associated with major morbidity, mortality, and costs to health services. Despite this burden, the incidence and prevalence of diabetic foot disease is unknown in Ireland. This paper presents a protocol for a systematic review to examine the incidence and prevalence of diabetic foot disease in the Irish population.

Methods

A systematic review will be performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pubmed, EMBASE, and Lenus, the Irish Health Research repository, will be searched for publications in any language and without restrictions to date. Title, abstract, and full text screening will be carried out independently by two investigators. Publications reporting on the incidence or prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, ulceration, or amputation in people with diabetes in Ireland, from a defined geographical catchment area of Ireland, will be included. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool will be used to assess included studies methodological quality. Results will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review can be used to inform appropriate stakeholders on the incidence and prevalence of diabetic foot disease in Irish populations, enabling decision making around appropriate use of resources to help prevent, and improve management of this disease.

Systematic review registration

CRD42023472904.

Effects of diabetes-related foot ulcer depth on healing days, cost, and quality of life: A prospective observational study

The relationship between the depth of the diabetes-related foot ulcers, and the healing days, cost, and QOL was examined.Depth 4 and 5 ulcers, namely beyond the tendons, exhibited significantly longer healing days and higher costs than Depth 2 and 3 ulcers. As for QOL, there were no significant differences in utility values between the depth categories.Results on healing time and cost reiterate the importance of early consultation, especially before the depth becomes deeper than the tendon.

Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in Patients with and without Peripheral Arterial Disease: Two Different Diseases?

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), comparing subjects with and without peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The study is a prospective study including a population of patients affected by a DFO located in the forefoot. All patients were managed by a surgical conservative approach defined by the removal of the infected bone, in association with the antibiotic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: those with PAD (neuro-ischaemic DFO) and those without (neuropathic DFO). After 1 year of follow-up, the following outcome were evaluated and compared between groups: healing, healing time, minor amputation, major amputation, hospitalization, need for surgical re-intervention. Overall, 166 patients were included, 87(52.4%) of them had neuro-ischaemic DFO and 79 (47.6%) neuropathic DFO. Patients with neuro-ischaemic DFO in comparison to neuropathic DFO were older (72.5 ± 9 vs 64.1 ± 15.5 years, P < .0001), had longer diabetes duration (21.8 ± 5.6 vs 16.4 ± 7.6 years, P < .0001), higher rate of dialysis (13.8 vs 1.3%, P = .001) and ischaemic heart disease (79.3 vs 12.7%, P < .0001). Outcomes for neuro-ischaemic DFO and neuropathic DFO were: healing (96.5 vs 97.5%, P = .7), healing time (7.8 ± 6.2 vs 5.7 ± 3.7 weeks, P = .01), minor amputation (16.1 vs 3.8%, P = .006), major amputation (0 vs 0%, ns), hospitalization (90.8 vs 51.9%, P < .0001), surgical re-intervention (14.9 vs 8.8%, P = .004) respectively. In addition, PAD resulted in an independent predictor of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. DFO in patients with PAD was characterized by longer healing time, more cases of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. PAD independently predicted the risk of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention, while it was not associated with the healing rate.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices on diabetic foot care among nurses in Kimberley, South Africa

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot is a dangerous complication of diabetes and can lead to high morbidity and mortality. As essential team members of the healthcare system, nurses play an important role in diabetic foot management and are indispensable in patients' education to prevent diabetic foot. The study assessed nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diabetic foot care in Sol Plaatje primary health care centres in the Northern Cape: Sol Plaatje's 14 district municipality clinics, Kimberley, Northern Cape.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional analytical study. A questionnaire assessed nurses' knowledge, practices and attitudes towards diabetic foot care in the above setting.

RESULTS

A total of 128 professionals, enrolled and auxiliary nurses who are providing primary care to patients within the 14 clinics in the Sol-Plaatje sub-district were recruited for the study. Hundred and five participants completed the self-administered questionnaires. The majority (95%) were females and 58.1% knew that South African Diabetic Foot Guidelines existed, while 57.7% had read them. About 57% did not know about the 60-s diabetic foot screening tool, and 67% did not know the 10 g monofilament test. Approximately 29.8% had never attended a class on diabetic foot care and 85.6% required training on diabetic foot care.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the majority of nurses working in the Sol-Plaatje sub-district primary health care centres are knowledgeable of the diabetic foot guidelines for primary care. However, there is a need for ongoing education on diabetic foot care.Contribution: The study results will help improve nurses' awareness of the importance of diabetic foot care.

Offloading systems for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of commonly used offloading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis (MA) has been performed for giving an answer to clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guideline on diabetic foot syndrome.

METHODS

The present MA includes randomized controlled studies (duration > 12 weeks) comparing, in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-infected neuropathic foot ulcer: any offloading device vs either no offloading device or conventional footwear; removable versus non-removable offloading devices; surgical procedure vs other offloading approaches. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing.

RESULTS

A total of 184 studies were identified, and 18 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that: any plantar off-loading, when compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing (MH-OR: 3.13 [1.08, 9.11], p = 0.04, I2 = 0%); total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, had a higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR: 2.64 [1.43, 4.89], p = 0.002, I2 = 51%); surgical offloading for active ulcers in combination with post-surgery offloading achieves higher ulcer healing rate when compared to offloading devices alone (MH-OR: 6.77 [1.64, 27.93], p = 0.008, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Any plantar offloading, compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing rate. Total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, is preferable. Surgical offloading for active ulcers, in combination with post-surgery offloading devices, achieves a higher ulcer healing rate when compared to other offloading devices alone. Further studies with a larger cohort of patients with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and extended follow-up periods are necessary.

The unique multidisciplinarity of diabetes-related foot disease

Few diseases globally require treatment from so many different disciplines as diabetes-related foot disease. At least 25 different professionals may be involved: casting technicians, dermatologists, diabetes (educator) nurses, diabetologists, dieticians, endocrinologists, general practitioners, human movement scientists, infectious diseases experts, microbiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, orthotists, pedorthists, physical therapists, plastic surgeons, podiatric surgeons, podiatrists, prosthetists, psychologists, radiologists, social workers, tissue viability physicians, vascular surgeons, and wound care nurses. A shared vocabulary and shared treatment goals and recommendations are then essential. The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has produced guidelines and supporting documents to stimulate and support shared and multidisciplinary evidence-based treatment in diabetes-related foot disease. In this special virtual issue of Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, all 21 documents of the 2023 update of the IWGDF Guidelines are bundled, added with a further 6 reviews from multidisciplinary experts to drive future research and clinical innovations, based on their contributions to the International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot. We hope the readers will enjoy this special virtual issue, and widely implement the knowledge shared here in their daily clinical practice and research endeavours with the goal to improve the care for people with diabetes-related foot disease.

Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.

The Stress of Measuring Plantar Tissue Stress in People with Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: Biomechanical and Feasibility Findings from Two Prospective Cohort Studies

Reducing high mechanical stress is imperative to heal diabetes-related foot ulcers. We explored the association of cumulative plantar tissue stress (CPTS) and plantar foot ulcer healing, and the feasibility of measuring CPTS, in two prospective cohort studies (Australia (AU) and The Netherlands (NL)). Both studies used multiple sensors to measure factors to determine CPTS: plantar pressures, weight-bearing activities, and adherence to offloading treatments, with thermal stress response also measured to estimate shear stress in the AU-study. The primary outcome was ulcer healing at 12 weeks. Twenty-five participants were recruited: 13 in the AU-study and 12 in the NL-study. CPTS data were complete for five participants (38%) at baseline and one (8%) during follow-up in the AU-study, and one (8%) at baseline and zero (0%) during follow-up in the NL-study. Reasons for low completion at baseline were technical issues (AU-study: 31%, NL-study: 50%), non-adherent participants (15% and 8%) or combinations (15% and 33%); and at follow-up refusal of participants (62% and 25%). These underpowered findings showed that CPTS was non-significantly lower in people who healed compared with non-healed people (457 [117; 727], 679 [312; 1327] MPa·s/day). Current feasibility of CPTS seems low, given technical challenges and non-adherence, which may reflect the burden of treating diabetes-related foot ulcers.