Analysis of dried blood spots is a feasible alternative for detecting ephedrine in doping control

Detection of doping substances in paired dried blood spots and urine samples collected during doping controls in Danish fitness centers

The use of dried blood spot (DBS) in anti-doping can be advantageous in terms of collection, transportation, and storage compared with the traditional anti-doping testing matrices urine and venous blood. There could, nonetheless, be disadvantages such as shorter detection windows for some substances compared with urine, but real-life comparison of the detectability of prohibited substances in DBS and urine is lacking. Herein, we present a liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS)-based screening method for simultaneous detection of 19 target analytes from the doping substance categories S1-S5 in a single spot. Ninety-eight urine and upper-arm DBS (Tasso-M20) sample pairs were collected from fitness centers customers notified for doping control by Anti Doping Denmark, and three sample pairs were collected from active steroid users undergoing clinical evaluation and treatment at a Danish hospital. The analytical findings were cross compared to evaluate the applicability of the developed DBS testing menu in terms of feasibility and analytical performance. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the detectability of prohibited substances in DBS and urine samples collected in a doping control setting. Twenty-seven of the urine samples and 23 DBS samples were positive, and we observed a very high concordance (95%) in the overall analytical results (i.e., positive or negative samples for both urine and DBS). Collectively, these results are very promising, and DBS seems suitable as a stand-alone matrix in doping control in fitness centers likely because of the high analyte concentration levels in these samples.

Changes in Immature Reticulocytes Aid the Indirect Detection of Microdose Recombinant Erythropoietin Use in Men and Women

PURPOSE

We investigated whether immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) and the immature reticulocytes to red blood cells ratio (IR/RBC) are sensitive and specific biomarkers for microdose recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) and whether the inclusion of reticulocyte percentage (RET%) and the algorithm "abnormal blood profile score (ABPS)" increased the athlete biological passport (ABP) sensitivity compared with hemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) and the OFF-hr score ([Hb]-60 × √RET%).

METHODS

Forty-eight (♀ = 24, ♂ = 24) participants completed a 2-wk baseline period followed by a 4-wk intervention period with three weekly intravenous injections of 9 IU·kg -1 ·bw -1 epoetin β (♀ = 12, ♂ = 12) or saline (0.9% NaCl, ♀ = 12, ♂ = 12) and a 10-d follow-up. Blood samples were collected weekly during baseline and intervention as well as 3, 5, and 10 d after treatment.

RESULTS

The rHuEPO treatment increased [Hb] (time-treatment, P < 0.001), RET% (time-treatment, P < 0.001), IRF (time-treatment, P < 0.001) and IR/RBC (time-treatment, P < 0.001). IRF and IR/RBC were up to ~58% ( P < 0.001) and ~141% ( P < 0.001) higher compared with placebo, and calculated thresholds provided a peak sensitivity across timepoints of 58% and 54% with ~98% specificity, respectively. To achieve >99% specificity for IRF and IR/RBC, sensitivity was reduced to 46% and 50%, respectively. Across all timepoints, the addition of RET% and ABPS to the ABP increased sensitivity from 29% to 46%. Identification of true-positive outliers obtained via the ABP and IRF and IR/RBC increased sensitivity across all timepoints to 79%.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, IRF, IR/RBC, RET% and ABPS are sensitive and specific biomarkers for microdose rHuEPO in both men and women and complement the ABP.

Annual banned-substance review-Analytical approaches in human sports drug testing 2021/2022

Also in 2021/2022, considerable efforts were invested into advancing human sports drug testing programs, recognizing and taking into account existing as well as emerging challenges in anti-doping, especially with regard to substances and methods of doping specified in the World Anti-Doping Agency's 2022 Prohibited List. In this edition of the annual banned-substance review, literature on recent developments published between October 2021 and September 2022 is summarized and discussed. Focus is put particularly on enhanced analytical approaches and complementary testing options in human doping controls, appreciating the exigence and mission in anti-doping and, equally, the contemporary "new normal" considering, for example, the athlete's exposome versus analytical sensitivity and applicable anti-doping regulations for result interpretation and management.