Multidecadal effects of fire in a grassland biodiversity hotspot: Does pyrodiversity enhance plant diversity?

Fire facilitates ground layer plant diversity in a Miombo ecosystem

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Little is known about the response of ground layer plant communities to fire in Miombo ecosystems, which is a global blind spot of ecological understanding. We aimed: (1) to assess the impact of three experimentally imposed fire treatments on ground layer species composition and compare it with patterns observed for trees; and (2) to analyse the effect of fire treatments on species richness to assess how responses differ among plant functional groups.

METHODS

At a 60-year-long fire experiment in Zambia, we quantified the richness and diversity of ground layer plants in terms of taxa and functional groups across three experimental fire treatments of late dry-season fire, early dry-season fire and fire exclusion. Data were collected in five repeat surveys from the onset of the wet season to the early dry season.

KEY RESULTS

Of the 140 ground layer species recorded across the three treatments, fire-maintained treatments contributed most of the richness and diversity, with the least number of unique species found in the no-fire treatment. The early-fire treatment was more similar in composition to the no-fire treatment than to the late-fire treatment. C4 grass and geoxyle richness were highest in the late-fire treatment, and there were no shared sedge species between the late-fire and other treatments. At a plot level, the average richness in the late-fire treatment was twice that of the fire exclusion treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity in fire seasonality and intensity supports diversity of a unique flora by providing a diversity of local environments. African ecosystems face rapid expansion of land- and fire-management schemes for carbon offsetting and sequestration. We demonstrate that analyses of the impacts of such schemes predicated on the tree flora alone are highly likely to underestimate impacts on biodiversity. A research priority must be a new understanding of the Miombo ground layer flora integrated into policy and land management.

Deep mowing rather than fire restrains grassland Miscanthus growth via affecting soil nutrient loss and microbial community redistribution

Fire and mowing are crucial drivers of grass growth. However, their effects on soil properties, microbial communities, and plant productivity in dry-alkaline grasslands have not been well investigated. This study evaluated the effects of mowing (slightly and deeply) and fire on vegetation traits (Tiller number per cluster and plant height) and biomass (plant dry weight), and soil availability of N, P, and K, as well as soil microorganism abundance in a Miscanthus system. We designed one control and three experimental grass plots (slightly and deeply mowed, and burned) in 2020-2021 in the Xi'an Botanical Garden of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, China. Tiller number, plant height per cluster, and soil N, P, and K availability during Miscanthus growth decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in all treatments compared to the control. However, this effect was much greater in the deep-mowing plot than in the other plots. After harvest, deep mowing induced the greatest effect on biomass among all treatments, as it induced a 5.2-fold decrease in dry biomass relative to the control. In addition, both fire and mowing slightly redistributed the community and diversity of the soil bacteria and fungi. This redistribution was significantly greater in the deep-mowing plot than in other plots. In particular, relative to the control, deep mowing increased the abundance of Firmicutes and especially Proteobacteria among soil bacterial communities, but significantly (p < 0.05) decreased Basidiomycota and increased Ascomycota abundance among soil fungal communities. We conclude that nutrient limitation (N, P, and K) is crucial for Miscanthus growth in both mowing and fire grasslands, whereas deep mowing can induce soil nutrient loss and microorganism redistribution, further restraining grass sustainability in dry-alkaline grasslands.

How Biodiversity-Friendly Is Regenerative Grazing?

Regenerative grazing management (ReGM) seeks to mimic natural grazing dynamics to restore degraded soils and the ecological processes underpinning sustainable livestock production while enhancing biodiversity. Regenerative grazing, including holistic planned grazing and related methods, is an adaptive, rotational stocking approach in which dense livestock herds are rotated rapidly through multiple paddocks in short bouts of grazing to defoliate plants evenly and infrequently, interspersed with long recovery periods to boost regrowth. The concentrated “hoof action” of herds in ReGM is regarded vital for regenerating soils and ecosystem services. Evidence (from 58 studies) that ReGM benefits biodiversity is reviewed. Soils enriched by ReGM have increased microbial bioactivity, higher fungal:bacteria biomass, greater functional diversity, and richer microarthropods and macrofauna communities. Vegetation responds inconsistently, with increased, neutral, or decreased total plant diversity, richness of forage grasses and invasive species under ReGM: grasses tend to be favored but shrubs and forbs can be depleted by the mechanical action of hooves. Trampling also reduces numerous arthropods by altering vegetation structure, but creates favorable habitat and food for a few taxa, such as dung beetles. Similarly, grazing-induced structural changes benefit some birds (for foraging, nest sites) while heavy stocking during winter and droughts reduces food for seedeaters and songbirds. With herding and no fences, wildlife (herbivores and predators) thrives on nutritious regrowth while having access to large undisturbed areas. It is concluded that ReGM does not universally promote biodiversity but can be adapted to provide greater landscape habitat heterogeneity suitable to a wider range of biota.