Lamotrigine use in patients with binge eating and purging, significant affect dysregulation, and poor impulse control

The Role of Mood Stabilizers in Children and Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa: A 1-year Follow-Up, Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

The existing literature on the use of mood stabilizers (MS) in children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) is limited, for the most part, to small case studies.

METHODS

This was an observational, naturalistic, propensity score-matched study. Subjects treated and not-treated with MS were compared by being matched via propensity score on age, sex, concurrent atypical antipsychotics, and concurrent antidepressants. General and AN-specific psychopathology was assessed with Symptom Check List-90-R, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Eating Disorders Inventory-3, and Body Uneasiness Test-A. Potential differences in admission-discharge modifications (body mass index (BMI), psychopathology) among the two groups were assessed. Finally, re-hospitalizations after 1-year follow-up were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 234 hospitalized patients (15.9+/-3.3 years; 26, 11.1% receiving MS). After propensity-score matching, 26 MS patients matched with 26 MS-not-treated subjects were included. MS were used for a mean of 126.1 (+/-87.3) days, and two cases of side effects were documented (alopecia and somnolence with valproate). No significant difference between MS-treated and not-treated patients emerged concerning admission-discharge improvements in BMI and AN-specific or general psychopathology. The cumulative survival from re-hospitalization at 12 months was 64,4% (95%-CI, 31.3-97.5) for MS and 58.7% (95%-CI, 22.2-95.2) for MS-not-treated subjects. No significant difference in survival rate emerged (hazard ratio, 0.04; Log-rank test: p=0.846).

CONCLUSIONS

This propensity score-matched study expands on the scant existing evidence of the use and side effects of MS in children and adolescents with AN. These results should be assessed in wider longitudinal samples.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines update 2023 on the pharmacological treatment of eating disorders

OBJECTIVES

This 2023 update of the WFSBP guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of eating disorders (EDs) reflects the latest diagnostic and psychopharmacological progress and the improved WFSBP recommendations for the assessment of the level of evidence (LoE) and the grade of recommendation (GoR).

METHODS

The WFSBP Task Force EDs reviewed the relevant literature and provided a timely grading of the LoE and the GoR.

RESULTS

In anorexia nervosa (AN), only a limited recommendation (LoE: A; GoR: 2) for olanzapine can be given, because the available evidence is restricted to weight gain, and its effect on psychopathology is less clear. In bulimia nervosa (BN), the current literature prompts a recommendation for fluoxetine (LoE: A; GoR: 1) or topiramate (LoE: A; GoR: 1). In binge-eating disorder (BED), lisdexamfetamine (LDX; LoE: A; GoR: 1) or topiramate (LoE: A; GoR: 1) can be recommended. There is only sparse evidence for the drug treatment of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), pica, and rumination disorder (RD).

CONCLUSION

In BN, fluoxetine, and topiramate, and in BED, LDX and topiramate can be recommended. Despite the published evidence, olanzapine and topiramate have not received marketing authorisation for use in EDs from any medicine regulatory agency.

Evaluating the use of lamotrigine to reduce mood lability and impulsive behaviors in adults with chronic and severe eating disorders

BACKGROUND

Gold-standard psychological and pharmacological treatments for bulimic-spectrum eating disorders only result in remission for around 50% of patients; patients with affective lability and impulsivity represent a subgroup with particularly poor outcomes. Both dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), a treatment for emotion dysregulation, and lamotrigine, a mood stabilizer, have demonstrated promise for targeting affective lability and impulsivity; however, data exploring the combination of these interventions remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

We followed a group of women with recurrent dysregulated eating behaviors (N = 62) throughout intensive DBT treatment and compared the symptom trajectory of those prescribed lamotrigine (n = 28) and those who were not (n = 34).

METHOD

Participants completed surveys every 2 weeks throughout treatment.

RESULTS

Group analyses suggested that all participants self-reported decreases in emotional reactivity, negative urgency, and symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The lamotrigine group reported greater elevations in BPD symptoms at baseline, but demonstrated steeper decreases in emotion and behavioral dysregulation than the non-matched comparison group. Within-subject analyses suggested that within the lamotrigine group, subjects reported greater decreases in symptoms following prescription of lamotrigine.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide initial data suggesting that lamotrigine could be useful as an adjunctive treatment for patients with affective lability and impulsivity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, time series without randomization.

Changes in cognitive and behavioral control after lamotrigine and intensive dialectical behavioral therapy for severe, multi-impulsive bulimia nervosa: an fMRI case study

PURPOSE

Adults with bulimia nervosa (BN) and co-occurring emotional dysregulation and multiple impulsive behaviors are less responsive to existing interventions. Initial data suggest that the combination of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and a mood stabilizer, lamotrigine, significantly reduces symptoms of affective and behavioral dysregulation in these patients. Identifying candidate neurobiological mechanisms of change for this novel treatment combination may help guide future randomized controlled trials and inform new and targeted treatment development. Here, we examined neurocognitive and symptom changes in a female patient with BN and severe affective and behavioral dysregulation who received DBT and lamotrigine.

METHODS

Go/no-go task performance data and resting-state functional MRI scans were acquired before the initiation of lamotrigine (after 6 weeks in an intensive DBT program), and again after reaching and maintaining a stable dose of lamotrigine. The patient completed a battery of symptom measures biweekly for 18 weeks over the course of treatment.

RESULTS

After lamotrigine initiation, the patient made fewer errors on a response inhibition task and showed increased and new connectivity within frontoparietal and frontolimbic networks involved in behavioral and affective control. Accompanying this symptom improvement, the patient reported marked reductions in bulimic symptoms, behavioral dysregulation, and reactivity to negative affect, along with increases in DBT skills use.

CONCLUSION

Improved response inhibition and cognitive control network connectivity should be further investigated as neurocognitive mechanisms of change with combined DBT and lamotrigine for eating disorders. Longitudinal, controlled trials integrating neuroimaging and symptom measures are needed to fully evaluate the effects of this treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention, such as case studies.

Comment on Keeler et al. Ketamine as a Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4158

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) represents a difficult therapeutic challenge, with up to 4% prevalence among females and increasing incidence among youth [...]

Reply to Skokou, M. Comment on “Keeler et al. Ketamine as a Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4158”

In response to our narrative review, which suggested the use of the glutamatergic n-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine as a potential treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) [...]

The comorbidity of eating disorders in bipolar disorder and associated clinical correlates characterised by emotion dysregulation and impulsivity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) have an increased risk of developing eating disorders (ED) or disordered eating symptoms compared to the general population. Eating pathology characterised by binge and/or purge symptomatology are the most common to develop in BD, yet the underlying aetiological mechanisms are relatively unknown. Theoretical models of BD-ED comorbidity suggest that shared pathophysiological factors, including emotion dysregulation and impulsivity may contribute to the development of binge/purge eating pathology in BD.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted to assess two research questions: 1. What are the prevalence or incidence rates of different ED in BD? 2. Are clinical correlates hallmarked by emotion dysregulation and/or impulsivity (alcohol/substance use disorders, mood instability and suicidality) significantly elevated in BD with ED (BD-ED) groups compared to BD only?

RESULTS

Any type of lifetime or current ED ranged from 1.9% to 33.3% in BD. Type of BD diagnosis did not appear to significantly impact likelihood of ED development. Alcohol use disorder, mood instability and suicidality were significantly higher in BD-ED compared to BD only.

LIMITATIONS

Potential biases within the selected studies; impacting generalisability of results and comparability between studies. Varying treatment interventions (including medications) may confound results and comparability between studies. Assessment of binge eating varied, also limiting comparability.

CONCLUSION

Eating pathology may occur comorbidly with BD due to shared underlying pathophysiological features. This could have significant implications for future interventions; both psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic. More comprehensive investigations are required to identify the functionality of dysregulated emotion and impulsivity in the development of eating pathology in BD.

Progress in Developing Pharmacologic Agents to Treat Bulimia Nervosa

This paper reviews past and current progress in developing pharmacologic agents for the treatment of individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN). We searched the literature and clinical trial registries for compounds studied in BN, the related condition, binge eating disorder (BED), and preclinical models of binge-eating behavior. Drug classes evaluated included antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, stimulants and other medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, opioid antagonists, and weight loss agents, among others. The only available drugs with established efficacy in BN at this time include antidepressants (especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]) and the antiepileptic topiramate, though the efficacy of these compounds is modest at best. The only medications we found currently receiving empirical study in people with BN were fluoxetine, other serotonergic antidepressants, intranasal naloxone, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, phentermine-topiramate combination, the antiandrogenic oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol plus drospirenone, and prazosin. Preclinical models suggest that nociceptin receptor antagonists, the selective serotonin 5-HT2C receptor agonist lorcaserin, monoamine stabilizers, and selective orexin-1 receptor antagonists might be helpful. We found no evidence of a drug developed specifically for the treatment of individuals with BN. Future areas for research in the pharmacotherapy of BN are suggested. Importantly, until drugs are developed specifically for eating disorders, drugs developed for other conditions that are centrally acting and associated with beneficial psychotropic effects and/or reduced appetite or weight loss might be considered for repurposing in BN.

Investigation of common, low-frequency and rare genome-wide variation in anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder presenting with dangerously low body weight, and a deep and persistent fear of gaining weight. To date, only one genome-wide significant locus associated with AN has been identified. We performed an exome-chip based genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in 2158 cases from nine populations of European origin and 15 485 ancestrally matched controls. Unlike previous studies, this GWAS also probed association in low-frequency and rare variants. Sixteen independent variants were taken forward for in silico and de novo replication (11 common and 5 rare). No findings reached genome-wide significance. Two notable common variants were identified: rs10791286, an intronic variant in OPCML (P=9.89 × 10-6), and rs7700147, an intergenic variant (P=2.93 × 10-5). No low-frequency variant associations were identified at genome-wide significance, although the study was well-powered to detect low-frequency variants with large effect sizes, suggesting that there may be no AN loci in this genomic search space with large effect sizes.

Temporal associations between affective instability and dysregulated eating behavior in bulimia nervosa

Prior research suggests that the construct of emotional instability may be salient to bulimia nervosa (BN), but no study to date has used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine its temporal association with binge eating and purging. In the current study, 133 women with DSM-IV BN used portable digital devices to provide multiple daily negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) ratings and record eating disorder behaviors over 2 weeks. Two state-of-the art indices quantified affective instability: probability of acute change (PAC), which represents the likelihood of extreme affective increases, and mean squared successive difference (MSSD), which represents average change over successive recordings. For extreme affective change, results revealed that on bulimic behavior days, extreme NA increases were less likely after bulimic behaviors than before them, and extreme increases in PA were more likely after bulimic behaviors than during the same time period on non-bulimic behavior days. However, average NA instability (i.e., MSSD) was (a) greater on bulimic behavior days than non-bulimic behavior days, (b) greater after bulimic behaviors than during the same time period on non-bulimic behavior days, and (c) greater after bulimic behaviors than before them. Results lend support to the notion that bulimic behaviors are negatively reinforcing (i.e., via post-behavior acute affective changes), but also indicate that these behaviors may exacerbate overall affective dysregulation. These findings may improve understanding of BN maintenance and inform the development of novel interventions or refinement of existing treatments.

A pilot open series of lamotrigine in DBT-treated eating disorders characterized by significant affective dysregulation and poor impulse control

BACKGROUND

There is little effective psychopharmacological treatment for individuals with eating disorders who struggle with pervasive, severe affective and behavioral dysregulation.

METHODS

This pilot open series evaluated lamotrigine, a mood stabilizer, in the treatment of patients with eating disorders who did not respond adequately to antidepressant medications. Nine women with anorexia nervosa- or bulimia nervosa-spectrum eating disorders in partial hospital or intensive outpatient dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)-based eating disorder treatment took lamotrigine for 147 ± 79 days (mean final dose = 161.1 ± 48.6 mg/day). Participants completed standardized self-report measures of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity after lamotrigine initiation and approximately biweekly thereafter. Mood and eating disorder symptomatology were measured at lamotrigine initiation and at time of final assessment.

RESULTS

Lamotrigine and concurrent DBT were associated with large reductions in self-reported affective and behavioral dysregulation (ps < 0.01). Eating disorder and mood symptoms decreased moderately.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our findings are limited by the confounds inherent in an open series, lamotrigine showed initial promise in reducing emotional instability and behavioral impulsivity in severely dysregulated eating-disordered patients. These preliminary results support further investigation of lamotrigine for eating disorders in rigorous controlled trials.