Competition from sea to mountain: Interactions and aggregation in low-diversity monogenean and endohelminth communities in twospot livebearer Pseudoxiphophorus bimaculatus (Teleostei: Poeciliidae) populations in a neotropical river

Shape variability and morphological discrimination of haptoral attachment structures in Urocleidoides spp. Mizelle et Price, 1964 (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) parasitizing fish from neotropical rivers in southern Mexico

The morphology of attachment organs in Monogenea is an essential source of evidence for taxonomic assessments and understanding of ecology and evolutionary history. It has been demonstrated that geometric morphometry analysis of the haptoral attachment organs provides rich and precise information about monogeneans morphology. In this study, we consider three monogenean species of Urocleidoides, U. simonae, U. vaginoclaustrum, U. vaginoclaustroides, and the incertae sedis species U. strombicirrus that parasitize fish of the Poeciliidae, Profundulidae and Characidae in neotropical rivers in southern Mexico. We aimed to identify new morphological characteristics that can be used to describe these populations with greater certainty and to test whether these characteristics present geographic variation. Anchor shape data (n = 69) were generated using geometric morphometric methods. We discriminated species using principal components and canonical variate analysis of shape data. Our results showed that there was discernible interspecific variation. The four species contributed four new morphological characteristics: anchor point length, short versus long anchor roots, elongated versus wide anchor shape, and the relative length of inner versus outer roots. Intraspecific variation was relatively low compared to interspecific anchor shape variation in Urocleidoides spp. These new morphological characteristics may also be useful for delimiting other similar species in Monogenea.

Comparison of methods to detect interspecific competition among parasites in depauperate communities

Because conducting experimental coinfections is intractable in most parasite systems, inferences about the presence and strength of interspecific interactions in parasite communities are often made from analyses of field data. It is unclear whether methods used to test for competition are able to detect competition in field-collected datasets. Data from a study of the intestinal helminth communities of creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) were used to explore the potential of commonly available methods to detect negative interactions among parasite species in species-poor, low-intensity communities. Model communities were built in the absence of competition and then modified by four modes of competition. Both parametric and null model approaches were utilized to analyze modelled parasite communities to determine the conditions under which competitive interactions were discerned. Correlations had low Type I error rates but did not reliably detect competition, when present, at a statistically significant level. Results from logistical regressions were similar but showed improved statistical power. Results from null model approaches varied. Envelope analyses had near ideal properties when parasite prevalence was high but had high Type I error rates in low prevalence communities. Co-occurrence analyses demonstrated promising results with certain co-occurrence metrics and randomization algorithms, but also had many more cases of failure to detect competition when present and/or reject competition when it was absent. No analytical approach was clearly superior, and the variability observed in the present investigation mirrors similar efforts, suggesting that clear guidelines for detecting competition in parasite communities with observational data will be elusive.