The prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction higher than 60%: a sub-analysis of the J-MELODIC study

BNP and NT-proBNP as prognostic biomarkers for the prediction of adverse outcomes in HFpEF patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents a challenge in clinical practice due to its complexity and impact on morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) was to evaluate the value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP in predicting overall adverse outcomes, cardiovascular events, and mortality, in patients with HFpEF. This SR/MA included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the use of BNP and NT-proBNP as prognostic biomarkers for adverse outcomes in HFpEF patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google, without language restrictions, from inception until June 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Twenty-two studies involving 10,158 HFpEF patients were included. The analysis showed that BNP is a significant predictor of overall adverse events in HFpEF patients, with an overall HR of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.20-1.52). Similarly, BNP was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in HFpEF patients with a HR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.64) and HR of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.04-1.84), respectively. When analyzing data for NT-proBNP predictive potential, 3 studies confirmed that NT-proBNP is a significant independent prognostic indicator for adverse events, with an overall HR of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.38-2.35). Comparable results were seen for mortality, with higher NT-proBNP levels associated with increased mortality risk and the MA showing a HR of 1.65 (95% CI: 1.55-1.76). This systematic review highlights the valuable prognostic role of BNP and NT-proBNP in predicting overall adverse outcome, cardiovascular events, and mortality in HFpEF patients. Our findings underscore the importance of further research to establish standardized thresholds and investigate BNP and NT-proBNP's potential in predicting morbidity and mortality.

Comprehensive diagnostic workup in patients with suspected heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be challenging and it could require different tests, some of which are affected by limited availability. Nowadays, considering that new therapies are available for HFpEF and related conditions, a prompt and correct diagnosis is relevant. However, the diagnostic role of biomarker level, imaging tools, score-based algorithms and invasive evaluation, should be based on the strengths and weaknesses of each test. The aim of this review is to help the clinician in diagnosing HFpEF, overcoming the diagnostic uncertainty and disentangling among the different underlying causes, in order to properly treat this kind of patient.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 and Clinical Outcomes in Japanese Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is an increasing health problem associated with a high mortality rate. Growth differentiation factor (GDF) 15, a stress response cytokine belonging to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, is associated with poor clinical outcomes in a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. However, the prognostic usefulness of GDF15 in Japanese patients with HF remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured serum concentrations of GDF15 and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in 1,201 patients with HF. All patients were prospectively followed for a median period of 1,309 days. In all, 319 HF-related events and 187 all-cause deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that, among GDF15 tertiles, the highest tertile group had the greatest risk of HF-related events and all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the serum GDF15 concentration was an independent predictor of HF-related events and all-cause deaths after adjusting for confounding risk factors. Serum GDF15 improved the prediction capacity for all-cause deaths and HF-related events with a significant net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement. Subgroup analysis in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction also showed the prognostic usefulness of GDF15.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum GDF15 concentrations were associated with HF severity and clinical outcomes, indicating that GDF15 could provide additional clinical information to track the health status of patients with HF.

Predictors and Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Above or Below 60

Background Although potential therapeutic candidates for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are emerging, it is still unclear whether they will be effective in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% or higher. Our aim was to identify the clinical characteristics of these patients with HFpEF by comparing them to patients with LVEF below 60%. Methods and Results From a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort (PURSUIT-HFpEF [Prospective Multicenter Obsevational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]), we investigated 812 consecutive patients (median age, 83 years; 57% women), including 316 with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and 496 with 60% ≤ LVEF, and compared the clinical backgrounds of the 2 groups and their prognoses for cardiac mortality or HF readmission. Two hundred four adverse outcomes occurred at a median of 366 days. Multivariable Cox regression tests adjusted for age, sex, heart rate, atrial fibrillation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and prior heart failure hospitalization revealed that systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.925 [95% CI, 0.862-0.992]; P=0.028), high-density lipoprotein to C-reactive protein ratio (HR, 0.975 [95% CI, 0.944-0.995]; P=0.007), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (HR, 0.870 [95% CI, 0.759-0.997]; P=0.037) were uniquely associated with outcomes among patients with 50% ≤ LVEF <60%, whereas only the ratio of peak early mitral inflow velocity to velocity of mitral annulus early diastolic motion e'(HR, 1.034 [95% CI, 1.003-1.062]; P=0.034) was associated with outcomes among patients with 60% ≤ LVEF. Conclusions Prognostic factors show distinct differences between patients with HFpEF with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and with 60% ≤ LVEF. These findings suggest that the 2 groups have different inherent pathophysiology. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000024414; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831 PURSUIT-HFpEF.

The Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Ambulatory Setting

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing healthcare burden, and its prevalence is steadily increasing. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a promising screening and prognostic tool in the heart failure population. However, more information on its value in predicting outcome is needed.

Aims: The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic performance of LUS B-lines compared to traditional and novel clinical and echocardiographic parameters and natriuretic peptide levels in patients with newly diagnosed HFpEF in an ambulatory setting.

Methods: In our prospective cohort study, all ambulatory patients with clinical suspicion of HFpEF underwent comprehensive echocardiography, lung ultrasound and NT-proBNP measurement during their first appointment at our cardiology outpatient clinic. Our endpoint was a composite of worsening heart failure symptoms requiring hospitalization or loop diuretic dose escalation and death.

Results: We prospectively enrolled 75 consecutive patients with HFpEF who matched our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We detected 11 events on a 26 ± 10-months follow-up. We found that the predictive value of B-lines is similar to the predictive value of NT-proBNP (AUC 0.863 vs. 0.859), with the best cut-off at >15 B-lines. Having more B-lines than 15 significantly increased the likelihood of adverse events with a hazard ratio of 20.956 (p = 0.004). The number of B-lines remained an independent predictor of events at multivariate modeling. Having more than 15 B-lines lines was associated with a significantly worse event-free survival (Log-rank: 16.804, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The number of B-lines seems to be an independent prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Since it is an easy-to-learn, feasible and radiation-free method, it may add substantial value to the commonly used diagnostic and risk stratification models.

Metabonomics Analysis of Myocardial Metabolic Dysfunction in Patients with Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Resistance

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is an important biological marker and regulator of cardiac function. BNP resistance is characterized by high concentrations of less functionally effective BNP and common in heart failure (HF) patients. However, the roles and consequences of BNP resistance remain poorly understood. Investigate the effects of cardiac BNP resistance and identify potential metabolic biomarkers for screening and diagnosis. Thirty patients and thirty healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. Cardiac functions were evaluated by echocardiography. The plasma levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and BNP were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the cGMP/BNP ratio is calculated to determine cardiac natriuretic peptide resistance. Liquid chromatograph tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based untargeted metabolomics analysis was applied to screen metabolic changes. The cGMP/BNP ratio was markedly lower in HF patients than controls. The cGMP/BNP ratio and ejection fraction (EF) were strongly correlated (R² = 0.676, P < 0.05). Importantly, metabolic profiles were substantially different between HF patients and healthy controls. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis demonstrated that the differentially expressed metabolites are involved in signaling pathways that regulate cardiac functions. In HF patients, BNP resistance develops in association with a reduction in heart function and metabolic remodeling. It suggests possible functional roles of BNP resistance in the regulation of cardiac metabolism.

Efficacy of Qishen Yiqi Drop Pill for Chronic Heart Failure: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 85 Studies

Background

Despite evidence for beneficial effects of Qishen Yiqi Drop Pill (QSYQ) on congestive heart failure, the majority of studies are based on insufficient sample sizes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of QSYQ using a meta-analysis approach. Methodology/Principal Findings. All relevant studies published before December 31, 2019, were identified by searches of various databases with key search terms. In total, 85 studies involving 8,579 participants were included. The addition of QSYQ to routine Western medicine increased 6-minute walking distance (SMD = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.72–2.44, p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.87–1.23, p < 0.001), and cardiac index (SMD = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.92–1.95, p < 0.001) and reduced brain natriuretic peptide (SMD = −2.28, 95% CI: -2.81 to -1.76, p < 0.001), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (SMD = −2.49, 95% CI: -3.24 to -1.73, p < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions (SMD = −0.92, 95% CI: -1.25 to -0.59, p < 0.001), and left ventricular end-systolic dimensions (SMD = −0.55, 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.21, p < 0.001). The results were stable in subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Our current meta-analysis indicated that QSYQ combined with Western therapy might be effective in CHF patients. Further researches are needed to identify which subgroups of CHF patients will benefit most and what kind of combination medicines work best.

Left atrial diameter and atrial fibrillation, but not elevated NT-proBNP, predict the development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with HFpEF

BACKGROUND

The determinants of pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have been poorly investigated in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

METHODS

From July 1 2017 to March 31 2019, a total of 149 consecutive HFpEF patients hospitalized with CVD were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. A systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) > 35 mmHg estimated by echocardiography was defined as PH-HFpEF. Logistic regression was performed to establish predictors of PH in HFpEF patients.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean age of participants was 72 ± 11 years, and 74 (49.7%) patients were females. A total of 59 (39.6%) patients were diagnosed with PH-HFpEF by echocardiography. The left atrial diameter (LAD) was related to the ratio of the transmitral flow velocities/mitral annulus tissue velocities in early diastole (E/E') and the left ventricular diameter in systole (LVDs). N-Terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was not found to be associated with LAD and impaired diastolic or systolic function of the left ventricle. Multivariable logistic regression showed that atrial fibrillation (AF) increased the risk of PH-HFpEF incidence 3.46-fold with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.44-8.32, P = 0.005. Meanwhile, LAD ≥ 45 mm resulted in a 3.43-fold increased risk, 95% CI: 1.51-7.75, P = 0.003. However, the significance levels of NT-proBNP, age and LVEF were underpowered in the regression model. Two variables, AF and LAD ≥ 45 mm, predicted the PH-HFpEF incidence (C-statistic = 0.773, 95% CI: 0.695-0.852, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Two parameters associated with electrical and anatomical remodelling of the left atrium were related to the incidence of PH in HFpEF patients with CVD.

The therapeutic effect of B-type natriuretic peptides in acute decompensated heart failure

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) exhibits roles in natriuresis and diuresis, making it an ideal drug that may aid in diuresing a fluid-overloaded patient with poor or worsening renal function. Several randomized clinical trials have tested the hypothesis that infusions of pharmacological doses of BNP to acute heart failure (HF) patients may enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in this clinical setting. Unfortunately, none of these have demonstrated beneficial outcomes. The current challenge for BNP research in acute HF lies in addressing a failure of concept and a reluctance to abandon an ineffective research model. Future success will necessitate a detailed understanding of the mechanism of action of BNP, as well as better integration of basic and clinical science.

Left ventricular contractile performance and heart failure in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction more than 40

Heart failure (HF) with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFmrEF) is considered a new category of HF and LVEF < 50%, which is the upper threshold of LVEF for HFmrEF, is thought to represent a mild decrease in LV contractile performance. We aimed to consider an LVEF threshold value to be taken as a surrogate for impairment of LV contractile performance, resulting in new-onset HF. We enrolled 398 patients with LVEF ≥ 40% that underwent cardiac catheterization. Using the LV pressure recording with a catheter-tipped micromanometer, we calculated the inertia force of late systolic aortic flow (IFLSAF), which was sensitive to the slight impairment in LV contractile performance. We evaluated the utility of the IFLSAF for predicting future cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF. We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the best LVEF threshold value for distinguishing whether the LV maintained the IFLSAF. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that the loss of IFLSAF was significantly associated with the future adverse events (HR: 7.798, 95%CI 2.174–27.969, p = 0.002). According to the ROC curve analysis, an LVEF ≥ 58% indicated that the LV could maintain the IFLSAF. We concluded that the loss of IFLSAF, which could reflect even slight impairment in LV contractile performance, was a reliable indicator for new-onset HF in patients with LVEF ≥ 40%. LVEF ≥ 58% could be taken as a surrogate for the IFLSAF maintenance; this threshold could be useful for risk stratification of new-onset HF in patients with preserved LVEF.

Comparison of the prognostic values of three calculation methods for echocardiographic relative wall thickness in acute decompensated heart failure

Purpose

Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness can be measured at the posterior wall (PW) and the intraventricular septum (IVS) in a parasternal long axis view by transthoracic echocardiography. Thus, there are three methods to calculate relative wall thickness as follows: RWT_PW = 2 × PWth/LVDd; RWT_IVS + PW = (IVSth + PWth) /LVDd; and RWT_IVS = 2 × IVSth/LVDd (IVSth = interventricular septum thickness; LVDd = LV internal dimension at end--diastole; PWth = posterior wall thickness). The aim was to compare the prognostic values of these RWTs in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Method

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study at a Japanese community hospital. A total of 389 hospitalized ADHF patients were divided into two groups based on the three median RWT values. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Survival analysis was performed, and Cox proportional hazard models unadjusted and adjusted by Get With The Guideline score were used.

Results

High-RWT_PW had poor survival (log-rank, P = 0.009) and was a significant risk (unadjusted HR (95%CI), 1.72 (1.14–2.61), P = 0.01; adjusted HR, 1.95 (1.28–2.98), P = 0.02). High-RWT_IVS + PW was not associated with poor survival on survival analysis or the unadjusted Cox model. Only the adjusted Cox model showed that High-RWT_IVS + PW was associated with a significant risk of the primary outcome (unadjusted HR (95%CI), 1.45 (0.96–2.17), P = 0.07; adjusted HR, 1.53 (1.01–2.32), P = 0.045). High-RWT_IVS did not have significant prognostic value.

Conclusions

When calculating RWT, RWT_PW should be recommended for evaluating the mortality risk in ADHF.

Heart failure prevalence in the general population: SOBOTA-HF study rationale and design

Aims

Epidemiological heart failure (HF) data in the era of natriuretic peptides and echocardiography are scarce. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the HF prevalence in the general population. We will also investigate natriuretic peptide cut‐off for diagnosis of HF. Finally, we will be able to identify left ventricular function phenotypes and study relations between cardiac function, clinical presentation, and health‐related quality of life.

Methods and results

Screening Of adult urBan pOpulation To diAgnose Heart Failure (SOBOTA‐HF) is a cross‐sectional prevalence study in a representative sample of Murska Sobota residents aged 55 years or more. Individuals will be invited to attend screening visit with point‐of‐care N‐terminal pro‐b‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) testing. All subjects with NT‐proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL will be invited for a diagnostic visit that will include history and physical examination, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, blood and urine sampling, ankle brachial index, pulmonary function tests, body composition measurement, physical performance tests, and questionnaires. To validate the screening procedure, a control group (NT‐proBNP < 125 pg/mL) will undergo the same diagnostic evaluation. An external centre will validate echocardiography results, and the HF diagnosis will be adjudicated within an international HF expert panel. Overall and age‐specific HF prevalence will be calculated in individuals ≥ 55 years and extrapolated to the whole population.

Conclusions

The SOBOTA‐HF study will test the latest HF guideline diagnostic criteria in the general population sample. Next to HF prevalence, it will provide insight into left ventricular function and general patient phenotype; we will also extend current understanding of natriuretic peptides for HF screening.

A Case of Multifaceted Assessment in an Elderly Patient With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a common health problem worldwide, including in Japan. Unfortunately, patient outcomes remain poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. Therefore, we need to assess the precise conditions, including cardiac function, in patients with HF, particularly in the elderly. We performed a multifaceted assessment in an elderly patient with HF on admission and at discharge using eight different evaluations (the mean life expectancy using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), the severity of dementia, nutrition, medication adherence, biomarker (the level of brain natriuretic peptide in blood), sociality, performance and comorbidity). Each parameter was scored on a 5-point scale (excellent = 5 points; good = 4 points; fair (average) = 3 points; poor = 2 points; failure = 1 point; maximum total points of 40) (Fukuoka University Heart Failure Scoring System, FUFS). An 86-year-old male patient who complained of dyspnea and lower-leg edema was admitted to our university hospital due to acute decompensated HF. After treatment, his symptoms improved, as did his cardiothoracic ratio, plural effusion and pulmonary congestion, and he exhibited compensated HF. His total score improved from 28 to 32 points, and his mean life expectancy using SHFM increased from 4.9 to 5.4 years. We evaluated the precise conditions using a multifaceted assessment strategy in an elderly patient with HF. The strategy was useful for evaluate the patient's condition in this case.

The prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction higher than 60%: a sub-analysis of the J-MELODIC study

Aims

Cardiac function varies in the population of patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; HFpEF). This study investigated the heterogeneity of clinical features associated with HF and the prognostic value of BNP levels in patients with HFpEF.

Methods and results

The study enrolled 288 patients with stable HF and serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL who were part of the original J‐MELODIC study cohort. They were categorized as having HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF; EF ≤ 40%, n = 83) or as having HFpEF (EF > 40%, n = 205). Patients with HFpEF were further categorized as having relatively low LVEF (HFrlEF; EF 40–60%, n = 107) or as having relatively high LVEF (HFrhEF; EF ≥ 60%, n = 98). We defined cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF as adverse events and evaluated the prognostic value of the BNP levels in each group. There was no significant difference in event‐free survival between HFpEF and HFrEF patients or between HFrhEF and HFrlEF patients. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the BNP level was an independent predictor of adverse events in HFrEF patients (hazard ratio: 4.088, 95% confidence interval: 1.178–14.179, P = 0.027) and in HFrlEF patients (hazard ratio: 14.888, 95% confidence interval: 4.969–44.608, P < 0.001) but not in HFrhEF patients (P = 0.767).

Conclusions

The BNP level has prognostic value in HFrlEF but not in HFrhEF. This indicates that HFrhEF and HFrlEF are distinct entities that may require different approaches for the management of HF.