Novel rate control strategy with landiolol in patients with cardiac dysfunction and atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom control with rate and rhythm management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with limiting symptoms, and with significant impairment in quality of life. As such, treatment strategies aimed at symptom control form an important pillar of AF management. Such treatments include a wide variety of drugs and interventions, including, increasingly, catheter ablation. These strategies can be utilised either singly or in combination, to improve and restore quality of life for patients, and this review covers the current evidence base underpinning their use. In this Review, we discuss the pros and cons of rate vs. rhythm control, while offering practical tips to non-specialists on how to utilise various treatments and counsel patients about all relevant treatment options. These include antiarrhythmic and rate control medications, as well as interventions such as cardioversion, catheter ablation, and pace-and-ablate.

Effectiveness of pharmacological cardioversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation during thoracic surgery operations: a single-centre experience

OBJECTIVE

Prophylactic pharmacological conversion agents could reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing thoracic operations. The current study examined whether the use of pharmacological conversion agents could help to restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF newly developed during thoracic operations.

METHODS

Medical records of 18,605 patients from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, at the Shanghai Chest Hospital were reviewed. Patients with non-sinus rhythm prior to the surgery (n = 128) were excluded from data analysis. The final analysis included 18,477 patients (n = 16,292 undergoing lung operations; n = 2,185 undergoing esophageal operations).

RESULTS

Intraoperative AF (defined as AF lasting for at least 5 min) occurred in 646 out of a total of 18,477 subjects (3.49%). Within the 646 subjects, 258 received pharmacological conversion agents during the surgery. sinus rhythm was restored in 20.15% (52/248) of patients treated with pharmacological cardioversion and in 20.87% (81/399) patients not receiving pharmacological intervention. In a subgroup analysis of the 258 patients receiving pharmacological conversion agents, recovery of sinus rhythm was highest in beta-blocker group (35.59%, 21/59 vs. 15.78%, 15/95 in amiodarone group, p = 0.008, 5.55%, and 1/18 in amiodarone plus beta-blockers group, p = 0.016). The incidence of hypotension was higher in pharmacological conversion (27.5% vs. 9.3% in patients not receiving pharmacological intervention, p < 0.001). In subjects not recovering to sinus rhythm during the surgery (n = 513), electrical cardioversion in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) restored sinus rhythm in > 98% of the cases (155/158 vs. 63/355 in subjects not receiving cardioversion; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that pharmacological conversion, in general, failed to show better treatment effectiveness on intraoperative new-onset AF within period of surgery except for beta-blockers. Patients with AF persisting beyond the surgery could be effectively managed with electrical cardioversion.

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on One-Year Mortality in Patients with Severe Lower Extremity Arterial Disease

Atrial fibrillation (Afib) is associated with the presence of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD), but its effect on a severe LEAD prognosis remains unclear. We investigated the association between Afib and clinical outcomes. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive severe LEAD patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Patients were divided according to the history of any type of Afib and followed for at least one year. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiac-related mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The study included 222 patients aged 74 ± 11 years (54% male), and 12.6% had acute limb ischemia. The Afib group had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (42.9% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.014) and MACEs (32.1% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.028) than the non-Afib group. Afib was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 2.153, 95% CI: 1.084–4.276, p = 0.029) and MACEs (adjusted HR: 2.338, 95% CI: 1.054–2.188, p = 0.037). The other factors associated with all-cause mortality included acute limb ischemia (adjusted HR: 2.898, 95% CI: 1.504–5.586, p = 0.001), Rutherford classification, and heart rate. Afib was significantly associated with increased risks of one-year all-cause mortality and MACEs in patients with severe LEAD. Future studies should investigate whether oral anticoagulants benefit these patients.

Effect of landiolol in patients with tachyarrhythmias and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): a case series

Tachycardia and rapid tachyarrhythmias are common in acute clinical settings and may hasten the deterioration of haemodynamics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), treated with inotropes. The concomitant use of a short‐acting β1‐selective beta‐blocker, such as landiolol, could rapidly and safely restore an adequate heart rate without any negative inotropic effect. We present a case series of five patients with left ventricular dysfunction, admitted to our Intensive Cardiac Care Unit with ADHF deteriorated to cardiogenic shock, treated with a combination of landiolol and inotropes. Landiolol was effective in terms of rate control and haemodynamics optimization, enabling de‐escalation of catecholamine dosing in all patients. The infusion was always well tolerated without hypotension. In conclusion, a continuous infusion of a low dose of landiolol (3–16 mcg/kg/min) to manage tachycardia and ventricular or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in haemodynamically unstable patients may be considered.

Clinical usefulness of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with rapid atrial fibrillation during landiolol treatment

BACKGROUND

Landiolol enables us to treat the patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) efficiently. We sought to determine the role of echocardiography in predicting the prognosis.

METHODS

Among 314 patients, a total 115 ADHF patients with reduced ejection fraction and rapid AF were enrolled. They received landiolol treatment to decrease the heart rate (HR) to <110 bpm and change HR (ΔHR) of >20% within 24 h. The dose of landiolol was increased every 2 h; then, we performed echocardiography repeatedly, at baseline, 2 h, and 24h. We followed the patients after discharge for 180 days, and checked cardiac death and HF hospitalization as major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

During initial hospitalization, 5 patients (4%) died. During 180 days after discharge, 19 (16%) out of 115 patients experienced MACE (2 cardiac death, 17 HF rehospitalization, 5 in-hospital death). Multivariate analysis showed that the change in left ventricular outflow tract-velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) at 2 h was the most significant predictor for MACE (hazard ratio =1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.83, p=0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated the patients with deteriorated LVOT-VTI at minimum dose landiolol suggested the high-risk patients for MACE (χ²=30.9, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

During landiolol treatment, the patients with deteriorated LVOT-VTI predicted the poor prognosis. We may detect the high-risk patients by two-point echocardiography. UMIN000020084. Registered 1 November 2013 - prospective study https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&type=summary&language=J&recptno=R000023203.

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation: new concepts in pathophysiology, management, and future directions

A bidirectional pathophysiological link connects heart failure and atrial fibrillation, creating a frequent and challenging comorbidity, which includes neurohormonal hyperactivation, fibrosis development, and electrophysiologic remodeling, while they share mutual risk factors. Management for these devastating comorbidities includes most of the established treatment measures for heart failure as well as rhythm or rate control and anticoagulation mostly for atrial fibrillation, which can be achieved with either pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical approaches. The current manuscript aims to review the existing literature regarding the underlying pathophysiology, to present the novel trends of treatment, and to predict the future perspective of these two linked diseases with the numerous unanswered questions.

Implication of heart rate optimization in patients with heart failure

Prognostic impact of heart rate reduction therapy using ivabradine, a selective inhibitor of If channel that purely reduces heart rate, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sinus tachycardia has been demonstrated. However, ideal heart rate remains unknown. We experienced an 80-year-old woman with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who was hospitalized due to congestive heart failure. Following the ivabradine administration that decreased her heart rate from 100 bpm down to around 60 bpm, the "overlap" between E-wave and A-wave in the trans-mitral Doppler echocardiography diminished, accompanied by an improvement in cardiac output. Heart rate optimization targeting to diminish the overlap between E-wave and A-wave might maximize cardiac output and improve the clinical course via facilitated cardiac reverse remodeling. Further studies are warranted to validate the implication of therapeutic strategy to aggressively minimize the echocardiographic "overlap" by heart rate reduction therapy in heart failure patients.

Novel rate control strategy with landiolol in patients with cardiac dysfunction and atrial fibrillation

While patients with acute heart failure often have tachycardia with atrial fibrillation, there have been no established medical tools that control tachycardia safely and definitely. Digoxin has been recommended as a first choice in the former guidelines, but it takes time to affect and has a risk of adverse events particularly for those with chronic kidney disease. Landiolol is a recently innovated ultra‐short‐acting beta‐blocker with 251‐fold β1/β2 selectivity, which was originally indicated only to control peri‐operative supra‐ventricular tachyarrhythmia by 2013 in Japan. We aimed to review how to use landiolol in patients with cardiac dysfunction and tachycardia due to atrial fibrillation. We reviewed recently conducted randomized control trials using landiolol, recently updated guidelines, as well as current practical use of landiolol. Japan landiolol vs. Digoxin (J‐Land) study demonstrated that landiolol was more effective to control tachycardia than digoxin in atrial fibrillation patients with left ventricular dysfunction in 2013. Given the result, the revised Japanese heart failure guideline recommends landiolol for rate control during atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure patients as Class IIa with evidence level B. Currently in Japan, landiolol is used for rate control, even in patients with advanced heart failure receiving continuous infusion of inotropes. The clinical use of landiolol in patients with cardiac dysfunction and tachycardia due to atrial fibrillation is increasing. Further studies are warranted to investigate the implication of faster and safer rate control using landiolol.