Prognostic impact of 6 min walk test distance in patients with systolic heart failure: insights from the WARCEF trial

Prognostic value of quality of life and functional status in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Functional health status is increasingly being recognized as a viable endpoint in heart failure (HF) trials. We sought to assess its prognostic impact and relationship with traditional clinical outcomes in patients with HF.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Cochrane central were searched up to January 2021 for post hoc analyses of trials or observational studies that assessed independent association between baseline health/functional status, and mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF across the range of left ventricular ejection fractions to evaluate the prognostic ability of NYHA class [II, III, IV], KCCQ, MLHFQ, and 6MWD. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. Relative to NYHA I, NYHA class II (HR 1.54 [1.16-2.04]; p < 0.01), NYHA class III (HR 2.08 [1.57-2.77]; p < 0.01), and NYHA class IV (HR 2.53 [1.25-5.12]; p = 0.01) were independently associated with increased risk of mortality. 6MWD (per 10 m) was associated with decreased mortality (HR 0.98 [0.98-0.99]; p < 0.01). A 5-point increase in KCCQ-OSS (HR 0.94 [0.91-0.96]; p < 0.01) was associated with decreased mortality. A high MLHFQ score (> 45) was significantly associated with increased mortality (HR 1.30 [1.14-1.47]; p < 0.01). NHYA class, 6MWD (per 10 m), KCCQ-OSS, and MLHFQ all significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HF.

CONCLUSION

Identifying such patients with poor health status using functional health assessment can offer a complementary assessment of disease burden and trajectory which carries a strong prognostic value.

Delivering effective, comprehensive, multi-exercise component cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for chronic heart failure patients in low resource settings in sub-Saharan Africa: Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital-(QECH-CR) randomised CR study, Malawi

BACKGROUND

The delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) and attaining evidence-based treatment goals are challenging in developing countries, such as Malawi. The aims of this study were to (i) assess the effects of exercise training/ CR programme on cardiorespiratory and functional capacity of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), and (ii) examine the effectiveness of a novel, hybrid CR delivery using integrated supervised hospital- and home-based caregiver approaches.

METHODS

A pre-registered (UMIN000045380), randomised controlled trial of CR exercise therapy in patients with CHF was conducted between September 2021 and May 2022. Sixty CHF participants were randomly assigned into a parallel design-exercise therapy (ET) (n = 30) or standard of care (n = 30) groups. Resting hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, distance walked in six-minutes (6MWD) and estimated peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) constituted the outcome measures. The exercise group received supervised, group, circuit-based ET once weekly within the hospital setting and prescribed home-based exercise twice weekly for 12 weeks. Participants in both arms received a group-based, health behaviour change targeted education (usual care) at baseline, 8-, 12- and 16-weeks.

RESULTS

Most of the participants were female (57%) with a mean age of 51.9 ±15.7 years. Sixty-five percent (65%) were in New York Heart Association class III, mostly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction 52.9 ±10.6%). The 12-weeks ET led to significant reductions in resting haemodynamic measures (all P <0.05). The ET showed significantly higher improvements in the 6MWD (103.6 versus 13.9 m, p<0.001) and VO2 peak (3.0 versus 0.4 ml·kg-1·min-1, p <0.001). Significant improvements in 6MWD and VO2 peak (both p<0.001), in favour of ET, were also observed across all follow-up timepoints.

CONCLUSION

This novel, randomised, hybrid ET-based CR, delivered to mainly HFpEF patients using an integrated hospital- and home-based approach effectively improved exercise tolerance, cardiorespiratory fitness capacities and reduced perceived exertion in a resource-limited setting.

Exercise during Hemodialysis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Failure

BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis experience physical deconditioning and multimorbidity. Exercise interventions may mitigate this outcome, but their clinical role is unclear. METHODS: This multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial evaluated combined endurance and resistance exercise training during hemodialysis versus usual care in chronic kidney failure. It assessed physical functioning, quality of life, hospitalizations, and overall survival. The primary outcome was the change in the 60-second sit-to-stand test (STS60) between baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1211 patients underwent randomization, 917 (65.9±14.4 years; 38.9% female) of whom were included in the full analysis (exercise intervention, n=446; usual care, n=471). At 12 months, the STS60 repetitions improved from 16.2±7.6 to 19.2±9.1 in the exercise group but declined from 16.2±7.1 to 14.7±7.9 in the usual care group (group difference, 3.85 repetitions; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22 to 5.48; P<0.0001). The timed up-and-go test (−1.1 seconds; 95% CI, −1.9 to −0.3) and the 6-minute walk test (37.5 m; 95% CI, 14.7 to 60.4) also differed in the exercise group versus usual care group. The physical summary score and vitality subscale of the quality of life questionnaire (i.e., the 36-item Short Form Health Survey) differed in the exercise group versus usual care group, but the other subscales did not change. Adverse events during dialysis sessions were similar in both groups. Median days spent in the hospital annually were 2 in the exercise group and 5 in the usual care group. Mortality and dialysis-specific adverse events were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of intradialytic exercise in patients with kidney failure significantly improved the STS60 compared with usual care. (Funded by the Innovation Fund, Federal Joint Committee; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03885102.)

Prognostic implications of six-minute walking distance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The incremental prognostic value of the six-minute walking test over conventional risk factors has not been evaluated in an adequate number of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Therefore, we aimed to examine its prognostic significance using data from the FRAGILE-HF study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 513 older patients who were hospitalized for worsening heart failure were examined. Patients were classified according to the tertiles of six-minute walking distance (6MWD): T1 (<166 m), T2 (166-285 m), and T3 (≥285 m). During the 2-year follow-up period after discharge, 90 all-cause deaths occurred. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the T1 group had significantly higher event rates than the other groups (log-rank p = 0.007). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the T1 group was independently associated with lower survival, even after adjusting for conventional risk factors (T3: hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.14, p = 0.042). The addition of the 6MWD to the conventional prognostic model showed a statistically significant incremental prognostic value (net reclassification improvement 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.49; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The 6MWD is associated with survival in patients with HFpEF and has an incremental prognostic value over conventional well-validated risk factors.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Six-minute Walk Test in Patients with HFrEF and Iron Deficiency

BACKGROUND

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to measure exercise capacity; however, the magnitude of change that is clinically meaningful for individuals is not well established in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for change in exercise capacity in the 6MWT in iron-deficient populations with HFrEF.

METHODS

In this pooled secondary analysis of the FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF trials, mean changes in the 6MWT from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 were calculated and calibrated against the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) tool (clinical anchor) to derive MCIDs in improvement and deterioration.

RESULTS

Of 760 patients included in the 2 trials, 6MWT and PGA data were available for 680 (89%) and 656 (86%) patients at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. The mean 6MWT distance at baseline was 281 ± 103 meters. There was a modest correlation between changes in 6MWT and PGA from baseline to week 12 (r = 0.31; P < 0.0001) and week 24 (r = 0.43; P < 0.0001). Respective estimates (95% confidence intervals) of MCID in 6MWT at weeks 12 and 24 were 14 meters (5;23) and 15 meters (3;27) for a "little improvement" (vs no change), 20 meters (10;30) and 24 meters (12;36) for moderate improvement vs a "little improvement,", -11 meters (-32;9.2) and -31 meters (-53;-8) for a "little deterioration" (vs no change), and -84 meters (-144;-24) and -69 meters (-118;-20) for "moderate deterioration" vs a "little deterioration".

CONCLUSIONS

The MCID for improvement in exercise capacity in the 6MWT was 14 meters-15 meters in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency. These MCIDs can aid clinical interpretation of study data.

Proposed Cardiac End Points for Clinical Trials in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Report From the Amyloidosis Forum Cardiac Working Group

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a rare, multisystemic, phenotypically heterogenous disease affecting cardiovascular, renal, neurological, and gastrointestinal systems to varying degrees. Its underlying cause is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains which leads to aggregation and deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in target organs. Prognosis is primarily dependent on extent of cardiac involvement and depth of hematologic response to treatment. To facilitate development of new therapies, a public-private partnership was formed between the nonprofit Amyloidosis Research Consortium and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In 2020, the Amyloidosis Forum launched an initiative to identify novel/composite end points and analytic strategies to expedite clinical trials for development of new therapies for the primary hematologic disorder and organ system manifestations. Specialized working groups identified organ-specific end points; additional working groups reviewed health-related quality of life measures and statistical approaches to data analysis. Each working group comprised amyloidosis experts, patient representatives, statisticians, and representatives from the Food and Drug Administration, the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and pharmaceutical companies. This review summarizes the proceedings and recommendations of the Cardiac Working Group. Using a modified Delphi method, the group identified, reviewed, and prioritized cardiac end points relevant to immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis in the context of an antiplasma cell therapy. Prioritized cardiovascular end points included overall survival, hospitalization, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiac Questionnaire, and cardiac deterioration progression-free survival. These recommended components will be further explored through evaluation of clinical trial datasets and formal guidance from regulatory authorities.

Prognostic impact of 6 min walk test distance in patients with systolic heart failure: insights from the WARCEF trial

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline 6 min walk test distance (6MWTD) on time to major cardiovascular (CV) events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and its impact in clinically relevant subgroups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the WARCEF (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction) trial, 6MWTD at baseline was available in 2102 HFrEF patients. Median follow-up was 3.4 years. All-cause death and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) exhibited a significant non-linear relationship with 6MWTD (P = 0.023 and 0.032, respectively), whereas a significant association between 6MWTD and CV death was shown in a linear model [hazard ratio (HR) per 10 m increase, 0.989; P = 0.011]. In linear splines with the best cut-off point at 200 m, the positive effect of a longer 6MWTD on all-cause death and HFH was only observed for 6MWTD > 200 m (HR per 10 m increase, 0.987; P = 0.0036 and 0.986; P = 0.0022, respectively). The associations between 6MWTD and CV outcomes were consistent across clinical subgroups; for age, a significant relationship between 6MWTD and HFH was observed in patients ≥60 years (HR per 10 m increase, 0.98; P < 0.001), but not in patients <60 years (HR per 10 m increase, 1.00; P = 0.98; P = 0.02 for the interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

In HFrEF, 6MWTD is independently associated with all-cause death, CV death, and HFH. 6MWTD of 200 m is the best cut-off point for predicting these adverse events. The prognostic impact of 6MWTD for HFH was only observed in older patients.