Characteristics and outcomes of patients screened for transcatheter mitral valve implantation: 1-year results from the CHOICE-MI registry

New echocardiographic screening tool for left ventricular tract obstruction risk assessment in TMVR

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an alternative to conventional surgery to treat severe mitral disease but its use is limited by the risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Screening depends on ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) that is not widely available and requires contrast. We developed and validated a transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) method to assess the risk of LVOTO after TMVR with the Tendyne System.

METHODS

We measured the LVOT longitudinal area on preoperative TTE dataset of patients screened for TMVR. The LVOT was measured as the box-area included by the aortic valve annulus, the anterior mitral leaflet (AML), the c-septum distance line, and the respective length of the AML on the interventricular septum. We analyzed the correlation between the TTE LVOT-box and the CT-measured neoLVOT area. Prediction performance for eligible patients was tested with ROC curves.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were screened, out of 14 patients (36%) not eligible for TMVR, 8 had risk of LVOTO. We found a linear correlation between the TTE LVOT-box and the CT-measured Neo-LVOT (r = 0.6, p = 0.002). ROC curve showed that the method is specific and sensitive and the cut-off value of the measure LVOT-box is 350 mm2.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method is reliable to evaluate the risk of LVOTO after TMR with the Tendyne System. It is quick and easy and can be used as a first-line assessment in the outpatient clinic. Patients with LVOT-box <350 mm2 should not be further screened with ECG-gated cardiac CT.

Leaflet modification with the ShortCut™ device to prevent coronary artery obstruction during TAVR

Transcatheter heart valve (THV) procedures require careful planning and consideration to prevent coronary artery obstruction (CAO), which poses a significant and potentially life-threatening condition, especially in patients undergoing valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite identifying predictors of CAO and utilization of computed tomography and inputting THV features, a significant uncertainty remains in predicting CAO. The ShortCut™ device (Pi-Cardia, Rehovot, Israel) was purposefully designed to modify the leaflets in patients undergoing TAVR, especially prior to ViV procedures, to overcome the risk for CAO. This review aims to detail the device's objectives, structure, procedural steps, the available clinical data, and future directions for its intended utilization in the structural arena for the prevention of CAO.

Clinical outcomes and predictors of transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement: the Tendyne Expanded Clinical Study

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are ineligible for conventional surgery. There are limited data on the outcomes of large patient cohorts treated with TMVR.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes and predictors of mortality for patients treated with transapical TMVR.

METHODS

This analysis represents the clinical experience of all patients enrolled in the Tendyne Expanded Clinical Study. Patients with symptomatic MR underwent transapical TMVR with the Tendyne system between November 2014 and June 2020. Outcomes and adverse events up to 2 years, as well as predictors of short-term mortality, were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were treated (74.1±8.0 years, 62.8% male, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality 7.7±6.6%). Technical success was achieved in 96.9% (185/191), and there were no intraprocedural deaths. At 30-day, 1- and 2-year follow-up, the rates of all-cause mortality were 7.9%, 30.8% and 40.5%, respectively. Complete MR elimination (MR <1+) was observed in 99.3%, 99.1% and 96.3% of patients, respectively. TMVR treatment resulted in consistent improvement of New York Heart Association Functional Class and quality of life up to 2 years (both p<0.001). Independent predictors of early mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; p=0.003), pulmonary hypertension (OR 3.83; p=0.007), and institutional experience (OR 0.40; p=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated clinical outcomes in the full cohort of patients included in the Tendyne Expanded Clinical Study. The Tendyne TMVR system successfully eliminated MR with no intraprocedural deaths, resulting in an improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Continued refinement of clinical and echocardiographic risks will be important to optimise longitudinal outcomes.

Management strategies and prognosis of patients ineligible for transcatheter mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) faces anatomical challenges, currently limiting widespread adoption.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the natural history and prognosis of patients ineligible for various TMVR devices.

METHODS

During a 4-year period (2019-2023) 3 TMVR devices (SAPIEN M3, Intrepid and Alta Valve) became available at a single institution (The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH) in the setting of pivotal clinical trials or early feasibility study. Consenting patients who were deemed ineligible ≥1 of these trials were prospectively studied to capture anatomical reasons for ineligibility, cross-over to alternative mitral valve therapies (surgery or high-risk mitral transcatheter edge to edge repair [M-TEER]), and clinical events.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (out of 71 consenting patients or 85.9 %) were deemed ineligible for TMVR during the study period. The mean age was 79.2 ± 8.8 years, 65.6 % were female, with elevated surgical risk (median STS 4.3, IQR: 2.7-7.3). The 2 most common anatomical reasons for ineligibility were increased risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) (n = 24, 39.3 %) and annular size (n = 29, 47.5 %). During follow-up (median 277 [162-555] days) there were 7 deaths (11.5 %) and 12 (19.7 %) hospitalizations for heart failure. Management strategies included high-risk M-TEER in 11 patients (1 death [9.0 %], 0 HF hospitalizations [0 %]), surgery in 9 patients (0 deaths, 1 HF hospitalizations [11.1 %]), and medical management in 41 patients (6 deaths [14.6 %], 11 HF hospitalizations [26.8 %]) (p = 0.715 for mortality and p = 0.093 for HF hospitalizations). Residual MR ≥ moderate was 0 %, 50 %, and 100 % for surgery, M-TEER and medical treatment, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One third of patients deemed ineligible for TMVR are candidates for high-risk M-TEER or surgery with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Our results have practical implications for patient management.

Left and Right Ventricular Hemodynamic Response After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Background

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents a novel treatment option for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR), but little is known about the hemodynamic impact of MR elimination following TMVR. We sought to investigate the hemodynamic impact of TMVR on left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function using noninvasive pressure-volume loops.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing TMVR with dedicated devices between May 2016 and August 2022 were enrolled. The end-diastolic and end-systolic pressure-volume relationships were estimated from 26 patients using single-beat echocardiographic measurements at baseline and after TMVR at discharge. RV function was assessed by RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling and RV fractional area change. One-year follow-up was available for 19 patients. The prognostic impact of calculated end-diastolic volume at an end-diastolic pressure of 20 mmHg (VPed20) reduction was assessed by Cox regression.

Results

A total of 26 patients (77.0 years [interquartile range 73.9-80.1], N = 17 [65.4%] male) with successful TMVR were included (secondary MR [N = 21, 80.8%]; median LV ejection fraction was 37.0% [interquartile range 30.7-50.7]). At discharge, a decrease in VPed20 (p < 0.001) indicating leftward shift of end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, and an increase of the end-systolic elastance slope (p = 0.007) were observed after TMVR. No changes were observed for RV-PA coupling (p = 0.19) and RV fractional area change (p = 0.22). At 1-year follow-up, LV contractility (end-systolic elastance) and RV-PA coupling remained stable. Vped20 reduction at discharge was significantly associated with 1-year all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71, p = 0.016).

Conclusions

Noninvasive assessment of pressure-volume loops demonstrated early LV reverse remodeling and improved LV contractility, while RV performance was preserved. These results indicate the potential prognostic impact of complete MR elimination after TMVR.

CardioTwins: case report of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve implantation in one patient

Background

Besides transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), there are new interventional treatment options for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in evaluation, such as a complete replacement of the valve through a prosthesis.

Case summary

A 78-year-old previous coronary artery bypass graft-operated patient with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation was sequentially treated by a transfemoral transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve prosthesis (Cardiovalve; Cardiovalve Ltd, Israel) due to unfavourable mitral valve anatomy. The transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) was performed first and after progression of the tricuspid regurgitation, a second transcatheter valve prosthesis was implanted in tricuspid position (TTVI) 1.5 years later. Imaging showed a twin look-alike picture of a mitral and tricuspid prosthesis and showing the possibility of a complete transcatheter based replacement of the mitral and tricuspid valve.

Discussion

This case shows the possibility of a Cardiovalve prosthesis being used for TMVI and TTVI in a single patient. Especially in TEER ineligible patients, it might be a good treatment option after device approval.

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

Etiologies and Impact of Exclusion Rates for Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Structural Heart Clinical Trials at a High-Volume Quaternary Care Hospital

There are various devices under clinical investigation for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI); however, the exclusion rates remain high. We aimed to investigate the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr), and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). There were 129 patients who were referred to St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center valve clinic and completed screening between January 2021 and July 2022. The causes for exclusion were classified into 4 categories: patient withdrawal, anatomic unsuitability, clinical criteria, and medical futility. In 129 patients, the exclusion rates for TMVr, TMVR, TTVr, and TTVR were 81%, 85%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. Patient withdrawal and medical futility were leading etiologies for exclusion, followed by anatomic unsuitability. TMVr had the highest rate of patient withdrawal (64%) and the lowest anatomic unsuitability (5%) because of short posterior leaflet length. Replacement interventions have a higher anatomic unsuitability (33%) than repair interventions (17%) (p = 0.04). Most exclusions of anatomic unsuitability were because of mitral stenosis or small annulus size for TMVR and large annulus size for TTVR. A total of 50% of exclusions from TTVr were because of the presence of pacemaker/defibrillator leads. In patients excluded from their respective trials, patients being referred for TMVr had the highest recurrent hospitalization and repair group had a higher mortality (p <0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and TTVI trials remain high because of various reasons, limiting patient enrollment and treatment. This supports the need for further device improvement or exploring alternative means of therapy.

A deep dive into the percutaneous mitral valve data

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review offers insights into percutaneous mitral valve management, emphasizing pivotal trials that contributed to its evolution.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent heart valve disease, with surgical intervention being the gold standard for managing primary MR. However, a notable proportion of patients face ineligibility criteria or are at high surgical risk, particularly in the setting of secondary MR. To fill this gap, transcatheter therapies have emerged as less invasive alternatives. Initially guided by the EVEREST trial criteria, transcatheter leaflet repair techniques have shown impressive technological improvements, addressing nowadays a wide range of anatomical scenarios. Evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of transcatheter leaflet repair is derived from pivotal trials, including EVEREST II, COAPT, MITRA-FR, and CLASP IID, and large multicenter registries including EXPAND, EXPAND G4, and EuroSMR. However, not all patients meet the anatomical and clinical criteria for leaflet repair. For those patients, transcatheter mitral valve replacement may be a minimally invasive option and multiple clinical trials are current underway.

SUMMARY

From MitraClip to newer and more innovative technologies, the landscape of percutaneous mitral valve interventions continues to evolve, offering new hopes to patients who may not be ideal candidates for conventional surgery.

Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement According to Regurgitation Etiology

BACKGROUND

Whether transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) devices perform similarly with respect to the underlying mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology remains unknown. The aim of the present analysis was to assess outcomes of TMVR according to the MR underlying etiology among the CHoice of OptImal transCatheter trEatment for Mitral Insufficiency (CHOICE-MI) registry.

METHODS

Of 746 patients, 229 patients (30.7%) underwent TMVR. The study population was subdivided according to primary, secondary, or mixed MR. Patients with mitral annular calcification were excluded. The primary study endpoint was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year. Secondary study endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year, New York Heart Association functional class, and residual MR, both at discharge and 1 year.

RESULTS

The predominant MR etiology was secondary MR (58.4%), followed by primary MR (28.7%) and mixed MR (12.9%). Technical success and procedural mortality were similar according to MR etiology. Discharge echocardiography revealed residual MR 2+ in 11.3%, 3.7%, and 5.3% of patients with primary, secondary, and mixed MR, respectively (P = .1). MR elimination was similar in all groups up to the 1-year follow-up. There was no difference in terms of primary combined outcome occurrence according to MR etiology. One-year all-cause mortality was reported in 28.8%, 24.2%, and 32.1% of patients with primary, secondary, and mixed MR, respectively (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study we did not find differences in short-term and 1-year outcomes after TMVR according to MR etiology.

Orthotopic Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Mitral valve dysfunction is prevalent amongst older patients. Of those not suitable for surgical therapy, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) can treat as large proportion of patients, many are not suitable TEER candidates. As such, orthotopic transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an important innovation but it faces significant challenges. Orthotopic TMVR requires a prosthesis with stable anchoring, adequate sealing, minimal footprint in the left ventricle and long term durability. Multidisciplinary expertise in advanced imaging, surgery, heart failure are needed for success.

Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement: 1-Year Results of the Real-World Tendyne European Experience Registry

BACKGROUND

Early studies of the Tendyne transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) showed promising results in a small selective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

The authors present 1-year data from the currently largest commercial, real-world cohort originating from the investigator-initiated TENDER (Tendyne European Experience) registry.

METHODS

All patients from the TENDER registry eligible for 1-year follow-up were included. The primary safety endpoint was 1-year cardiovascular mortality. Primary performance endpoint was reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 195 eligible patients undergoing TMVR (median age 77 years [Q1-Q3: 71-81 years], 60% men, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality 5.6% [Q1-Q3: 3.6%-8.9%], 81% in NYHA functional class III or IV, 94% with MR 3+/4+), 31% had "real-world" indications for TMVR (severe mitral annular calcification, prior mitral valve treatment, or others) outside of the instructions for use. The technical success rate was 95%. The cardiovascular mortality rate was 7% at 30 day and 17% at 1 year (all-cause mortality rates were 9% and 29%, respectively). Reintervention or surgery following discharge was 4%, while rates of heart failure hospitalization reduced from 68% in the preceding year to 25% during 1-year follow-up. Durable MR reduction to ≤1+ was achieved in 98% of patients, and at 1 year, 83% were in NYHA functional class I or II. There was no difference in survival and major adverse events between on-label use and "real-world" indications up to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, real-world, observational registry reports high technical success, durable and complete MR elimination, significant clinical benefits, and a 1-year cardiovascular mortality rate of 17% after Tendyne TMVR. Outcomes were comparable between on-label use and "real-world" indications, offering a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients without alternative treatments. (Tendyne European Experience Registry [TENDER]; NCT04898335).

Early outcomes of transapical mitral valve implantation versus surgical replacement in matched elderly patients at intermediate surgical risk

BACKGROUND

Data comparing transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) with surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) are lacking.

AIMS

This study sought to compare the 30-day Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 device success of TMVI with that of SMVR.

METHODS

Matching protocol combined exact matching (sex, atrial fibrillation, previous surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]), coarsened exact matching (age) and propensity score matching (body mass index, mitral valve pathology and concomitant tricuspid regurgitation).

RESULTS

A total of 40 Tendyne TMVI and 80 SMVR patients with similar baseline characteristics were analysed (TMVI vs SMVR): age (78 years [interquartile range [{IQR} 75; 80] vs 78 years [IQR 73; 80]; p=0.8), female (60% vs 60%; p=1.0), atrial fibrillation (67.5% vs 63.7%; p=0.8), previous SAVR (12.5% vs 10.0%; p=0.8), previous CABG (20.0% vs 16.2%; p=0.8), body mass index (25.54 kg/m² vs 25.24 kg/m²; p=0.7) and valve pathology (mitral regurgitation: 70.0% vs 73.8%, mitral stenosis: 7.5% vs 3.8%, and mixed disease: 22.5% vs 22.5%; p=0.6). Most baseline characteristics not included in the matching model were balanced among the TMVI/SMVR cohorts: European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II (5.8% [IQR 2.9; 7.5] vs 4.2% [IQR 2.4; 6.8]; p=0.3) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score (5.2% [IQR 3.2; 8.6] vs 4.1% [IQR 3.3; 6.1]; p=0.076). Coronary artery disease (67.5% vs 32.5%; p<0.001) and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (47.5% vs 25.0%; p=0.023) differed among groups. Mitral VARC (MVARC) device success at 30 days was achieved in 82.5% of patients after TMVI and 57.5% of patients after SMVR (p=0.04). MVARC procedural success at 30 days was 75.0% after TMVI versus 52.5% after SMVR (p=0.07). Thirty-day mortality (2.5% vs 3.8%; p=0.47), technical success (97.5% vs 97.5%; p=1.0), major bleeding (17.5% vs 18.7%; p=0.087), stroke (5.0% vs 4.9%; p=1.0) and postoperative haemodialysis (7.5% vs 5.2%; p=0.4) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intermediate surgical risk, according to STS-PROM and EuroSCORE II, demonstrated higher rates of MVARC device at 30 days after TMVI compared to 30 days after SMVR. Rates of survival and procedural success, neurological, renal and bleeding complications were similar. Transfusion count and length of stay were lower after TMVI. For elderly patients at intermediate risk, a TMVI eligibility assessment may be considered.

Secondary retensioning of a tether-based device for transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

Relevant paravalvular leakage (PVL) due to prosthesis dislodgement is a rare but potentially severe complication after transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI). Due to the epicardial anchoring mechanism of the Tendyne® TMVI system, repositioning of the valve stent may be possible by retensioning of the tether. This multicentre study aimed to investigate the procedural and short-term safety as well as efficacy of retensioning manoeuvres.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2021, N = 18 patients who underwent secondary tether retensioning were identified. Baseline, procedural and follow-up data were available from N = 11 patients and analysed according to the Mitral Valve Research Consortium definitions. Continuous variables are shown as median with interquartile range.

RESULTS

All patients [age 75 years (73.5, 85.0), 64% male (N = 7), EuroSCORE II 6.2% (5.8, 11.6)] presented with post-procedural PVL [63.6% (N = 7) with PVL ≥3+]. Of these, 54% (N = 6) showed signs of haemolysis. The majority were severely symptomatic [New York Heart Association ≥III (91%, N = 10)]. Procedural outcomes revealed no acute complications and no mortality. At discharge, PVL was completely eliminated in 91% (N = 10) of patients with 1 case of remaining moderate PVL. At 30 days, Mitral Valve Research Consortium device success was achieved in 82% (N = 9) of patients. Two patients required open surgical mitral valve replacement due to persistent and recurrent PVL. In 89% (N = 8) of patients with successful retensioning procedure, New York Heart Association class was I/II. There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentre study demonstrates technical feasibility, procedural safety and acute efficacy of retensioning procedures in the majority of patients. The potential to retension the tether in transapical TMVI may provide additional management advantages in populations at high surgical risk.

Transcatheter transseptal treatment of patients with severe mitral regurgitation using an atrial fixation mitral valve replacement technology

BACKGROUND

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular heart disease worldwide with a 5-year mortality rate of 50 % with medical therapy alone. Several transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) devices are being investigated in clinical trials. Early evidence has demonstrated clinical benefits with a reduction in heart failure symptoms, low rates of residual MR, and reverse remodeling of the left ventricle (LV) over time. However, high anatomical screen failure rates limit its applicability. The primary reasons for the anatomical screen failure are risk of LV outflow tract obstruction, large mitral valve annulus size, and the presence of mitral annular calcification. Our clinical experiences using an atrial only fixation TMVR technology delivered via a transfemoral-transseptal approach is described.

METHODS

Three consecutive patients with severe functional MR underwent TMVR implantation using an atrial only fixation technology and a low-profile transseptal delivery system.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 100 % of the patients with a clinically significant reduction in MR. Longer-term follow-up (up to 6-months) has demonstrated a sustained reduction in MR and significant improvement in quality of life for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer-term outcomes in our patients showed persistent reduction in MR, sustained implant performance, and notable improvements in NYHA Class and quality of life. There were no major adverse events. Follow-up CT data showed no evidence of device-related thrombosis, with stable valve position and integrity. The atrial fixation TMVR technology may have benefits in preserving the dynamics of the native mitral valve annulus thereby reducing the overall risk of LVOT obstruction.

SHORT ABSTRACT

We present a single-center experience of three consecutive patients with severe functional MR treated with the AltaValve using a low-profile transseptal delivery system. A clinically significant reduction in mitral regurgitation was achieved in all patients, and longer-term follow-up has demonstrated sustained clinical benefits.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the Tendyne system

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as alternative to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR); however, the role of TMVR with the Tendyne system among established treatments of MR is not well defined. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with the Tendyne system in the current clinical practice.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography and were judged eligible for the Tendyne system.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were eligible for TMVR with the Tendyne system. Of these, 17 patients underwent TMVR, and 46 were treated by TEER. Patients treated with the Tendyne system were more likely to have a high transmitral pressure gradient and unsuitable mitral valve morphology for TEER than those treated with TEER. TMVR with the Tendyne system reduced the severity of MR to less than 1 + in 94.1% of the patients at discharge and achieved a greater reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume at the 30-day follow-up compared with TEER. In contrast, patients treated with the Tendyne system had a higher 30-day mortality than those treated with TEER, while the mortality between 30 days and one year was comparable between Tendyne and TEER.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients eligible for the Tendyne system, approximately a quarter of the patients underwent TMVR with the Tendyne system, which led substantial reduction of MR and LV reverse remodeling than TEER. In contrast, the 30-day mortality rate was higher after TMVR with the Tendyne compared to TEER.

Preemptive alcohol septal ablation prior to transcatheter mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been shown to increase the neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area before transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) but there is little literature on its success and use with dedicated devices.

AIMS

To describe our experience with preemptive ASA to increase the predicted neo-LVOT area and its utility with both dedicated TMVR devices and balloon-expandable valves.

METHODS

All patients who underwent ASA for TMVR candidacy in our center between May 2018 and October 2022 and had computed tomography (CT) scans done before and after ASA were included. Each CT was assessed for the minimum predicted neo-LVOT area at end-systole, using a virtual valve of the desired TMVR device for each patient. The primary outcome was an increase in the predicted neo-LVOT area after ASA that was deemed sufficient for safe implantation of the desired TMVR device. The secondary outcome was the absence of acute LVOT obstruction after TMVR.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients underwent ASA and all but 1 (n = 11, 91.6%) achieved the primary outcome of having sufficient predicted neo-LVOT area to proceed with TMVR. The mean increase in neo-LVOT area after ASA was 126 ± 64 mm2 (median 119.5, interquartile range: 65.0-163.5 mm2 ). Two patients (16.7%) required a permanent pacemaker after ASA. Nine patients went on and underwent TMVR with their respective devices and none had LVOT obstruction after the procedure. Among the remaining three patients, one had insufficient neo-LVOT clearance after ASA, one had unrelated mortality before TMVR, and one had advanced heart failure before TMVR.

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients and at centers experienced with ASA, preemptive ASA can achieve sufficient neo-LVOT clearance for TMVR with a variety of devices in approximately 90% of patients.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for native valve disease

Mitral regurgitation is the second most frequent heart valve disease in Europe and the most frequent in the US. Although surgery is the therapy of choice when intervention is indicated, transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement are alternatives for patients who are not eligible for surgery. However, the development of transcatheter mitral valves is slower than expected. Although several transcatheter heart valves have been developed, only one has been commercialised. Indeed, most of these devices are being evaluated in clinical studies, with promising initial results. In this review, we propose an overview on transcatheter mitral valve replacement for the treatment of native mitral valve disease, from indication to results, including patients with severe annular calcification, and we provide you with a glimpse into the future of these therapies.

Update on Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation represents a clinical challenge. They are associated with a poor prognosis, and many patients are not eligible for conventional surgery. Transcatheter therapies have been the focus of numerous studies and devices over the past decade. Here, we provide a summary of current options for transcatheter treatment of these 2 entities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of edge-to-edge repair for increasing numbers of patients. Encouraging early results with transcatheter valve replacement are also becoming available. To date, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is currently the first-line transcatheter treatment for both mitral and tricuspid regurgitation for many patients who are not candidates for surgery. A number of transcatheter replacement devices are under development and clinical investigation but, for the most part, their current use is limited to compassionate cases or clinical trials.

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: two-year results of the CHOICE-MI Registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using dedicated devices is an alternative therapy for high-risk patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR).

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients undergoing TMVR from the multicentre CHOICE-MI Registry.

METHODS

The CHOICE-MI Registry included consecutive patients with symptomatic MR treated with 11 different dedicated TMVR devices at 31 international centres. The investigated endpoints included mortality and heart failure hospitalisation rates, procedural complications, residual MR, and functional status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was applied to identify independent predictors of 2-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients, median age 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71, 81), 59.5% male, EuroSCORE II 6.2% (IQR 3.8, 12.0), underwent TMVR. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of patients. MR reduction to ≤1+ was observed in 95.2% at discharge with durable results at 1 and 2 years. New York Heart Association Functional Class had improved significantly at 1 and 2 years. All-cause mortality was 9.2% at 30 days, 27.9% at 1 year and 38.1% at 2 years after TMVR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and low serum albumin were independent predictors of 2-year mortality. Among the 30-day complications, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, access site and bleeding complications showed the strongest impact on 2-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world registry of patients with symptomatic MR undergoing TMVR, treatment with TMVR was associated with a durable resolution of MR and significant functional improvement at 2 years. Two-year mortality was 38.1%. Optimised patient selection and improved access site management are mandatory to improve outcomes.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure: Current Advances in Diagnosis and Management

The causes of mitral regurgitation (MR) can be broadly divided into primary and secondary causes. Although primary MR is caused by degenerative alterations of the mitral valve and the mitral valve apparatus, secondary (functional) MR is multifactorial and related to dilation of the left ventricle and/or mitral annulus commonly resulting in concomitant restriction of the leaflets. Therefore, the treatment of secondary MR (SMR) is complex and includes guideline directed heart failure therapy along with surgical and transcatheter approaches that have shown effectiveness in certain subgroups. This review aims to provide insight into current advances in diagnosis and management of SMR.

Prevention of LVOT Obstruction by Device-Mediated Laceration of the Anterior Mitral Valve Leaflet During TMVR

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction represents a life-threatening complication in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Interventional approaches to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction are complex and require exceptional procedural expertise. We demonstrate feasibility and safety of first-in-human device-mediated mechanical laceration of the anterior mitral valve leaflet prior to transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Transcatheter mitral and tricuspid interventions-the bigger picture: valvular disease as part of heart failure

The prevalence of mitral (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR), especially in heart failure (HF) populations, is high. However, the distinct role of atrioventricular valve diseases in HF, whether they are merely indicators of disease status or rather independent contributors in a vicious disease cycle, is still not fully understood. For decades, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was considered an innocent bystander subsequent to other heart or lung pathologies, thus, not needing dedicated treatment. Recent increasing awareness towards the role of atrioventricular valve diseases has revealed that MR and TR are, in fact, independent predictors of outcome in HF, thus, warranting attention in the HF treatment algorithm. This awareness arose, especially, with the development of minimally invasive transcatheter solutions providing new treatment options, which can also be used for patients considered as having increased surgical risk. However, outcomes of such transcatheter treatments have, in part, been sub-optimal and likely influenced by the status of the concomitant HF disease. Thus, this review aims to summarize data on the current understanding regarding the role of MR and TR in HF, how HF impacts outcomes of transcatheter MR and TR interventions, and how the understanding of this relationship might help to identify patients that benefit most from these therapies, which have proven to be lifesaving in properly selected candidates.

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement or repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: a propensity score-matched analysis

AIMS

This study aimed to compare outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for the treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CHOICE-MI registry included 262 patients with SMR treated with TMVR between 2014 and 2022. The EuroSMR registry included 1065 patients with SMR treated with M-TEER between 2014 and 2019. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed for 12 demographic, clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Echocardiographic, functional and clinical outcomes out to 1 year were compared in the matched cohorts. After PS matching, 235 TMVR patients (75.5 years [70.0, 80.0], 60.2% male, EuroSCORE II 6.3% [interquartile range 3.8, 12.4]) were compared to 411 M-TEER patients (76.7 years [70.1, 80.5], 59.0% male, EuroSCORE II 6.7% [3.9, 12.4]). All-cause mortality was 6.8% after TMVR and 3.8% after M-TEER at 30 days (p = 0.11), and 25.8% after TMVR and 18.9% after M-TEER at 1 year (p = 0.056). No differences in mortality after 1 year were found between both groups in a 30-day landmark analysis (TMVR: 20.4%, M-TEER: 15.8%, p = 0.21). Compared to M-TEER, TMVR resulted in more effective mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction (residual MR ≤1+ at discharge for TMVR vs. M-TEER: 95.8% vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001), and superior symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association class ≤II at 1 year: 77.8% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

In this PS-matched comparison between TMVR and M-TEER in patients with severe SMR, TMVR was associated with superior reduction of MR and superior symptomatic improvement. While post-procedural mortality tended to be higher after TMVR, no significant differences in mortality were found beyond 30 days.

Thirty-day and one-year outcomes following transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair versus transapical mitral valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

Background

A comparison of 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with pre-existing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or transcatheter transapical mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has not previously been reported.

Aims

We aimed to compare 30-day and 1-year rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as rehospitalisation for heart failure (HFH).

Methods

All patients with severe (≥3+) symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) and an LV ejection fraction ≤50% who underwent TEER or TMVR over a 5-year period were evaluated.

Results

Ninety-six patients (50 TEER, age 80±9 years, 70% secondary MR and 46 TMVR, age 72±9 years, 91% secondary MR) were studied. Baseline demographic and transthoracic echocardiogram characteristics were well-matched, with the exception of age (TEER 80±9 vs TMVR 72±9; p=0.01). Successful device implantation occurred in 96% of TEER patients and 97.8% of TMVR patients. Ninety-two percent of TEER patients had ≤2+MR predischarge, whilst no TMVR patient had ≥1+MR (p<0.01). No significant difference in the combined endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or HFH was observed (p>0.05). At 1 year, freedom from all-cause mortality and HFH was 79.2% across the entire study population but was significantly higher in patients undergoing TEER (TEER: n=45 [90%] hazard ratio 11.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.59-11.93 vs TMVR: n=39 [67.4%] 95% CI: 10.09-11.33; p=0.008).

Conclusions

Despite comparable rates of successful device implantation, MR reduction, and 30-day all-cause mortality/HFH, TEER patients had lower all-cause mortality and HFH rates at 1 year.

The Clinical Profile and Natural History of Patients Who Fail Screening for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Rationale and Design of the Prospective Multicenter Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS)

Mitral valve disease is insidious and associated with a decreased quality of life and survival over time. Despite surgery being the standard of care, many patients are at prohibitive surgical risk. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients with symptomatic mitral valve disease fail stringent screening criteria for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). The natural history of patients who fail screening is not well-characterized, and data are limited on the reasons for screen failure in this population. The Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS) seeks to detail the clinical profile and natural history of patients who fail screening for TMVR. The MVSS is a prospective, multicenter registry enrolling up to 1000 consecutive subjects who, after screening for TMVR, are deemed not to be candidates. Subjects will be followed for 30 days after failing screening for TMVR and annually for up to 5 years with clinical evaluations. The primary study endpoint of the MVSS registry is all-cause mortality at 1 year. Additional secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, subsequent mitral valve intervention (transcatheter or surgical), reason for screen failure, and quality-of-life assessments at 30 days and annually up to 5 years of follow-up. The MVSS registry is the first prospective multicenter study to characterize the clinical and anatomical profile of patients who fail screening for TMVR while providing longitudinal clarification on the natural history and outcomes of these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04736667, NCT04736667.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients screened for but DEemed CLInically Not suitablE for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter therapies are a recognized alternative intervention in patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high surgical risk. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients screened for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), establish the clinical and anatomical reasons for unsuitability, and determine clinical course and early outcomes.

METHODS

International multicenter registry was conducted of consecutive patients screened for TMVR at 12 centers in Europe, the United States and Canada between April 2015 and September 2018. Patient-level retrospective data were collected for all patients screened.

RESULTS

From a total of 294 patients, 87 (30%) patients were suitable for and underwent TMVR while 207 (70%) patients were unsuitable for TMVR. There was no difference in STS predicted risk of mortality (6.3±4.3% vs 6.7±6.1%, p=0.52) for mitral valve replacement between the groups. The most common reasons for TMVR unsuitability were mitral annular size outside therapeutic range (28%) and small predicted neo-LVOT (25%). Pre-procedural multidetector computed tomographic demonstrated that patients unsuitable for TMVR had smaller predicted neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area (318±192mm² vs 495±202mm², p=0.04). At 30-days, there was no difference in rates of rehospitalization (8% vs 8%, p=0.21), stroke (1% vs 2%, p=0.42), or mortality (4% vs 10%, p=0.10), unadjusted for procedural risk, between unsuitable for TMVR and TMVR groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of patient's failed screening as anatomically unsuitable for TMVR. The findings of this study have important clinical implications, highlighting an unmet clinical need and provide a target for design innovation in future iterations of TMVR devices.

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement: there is still work to be done

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a novel therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Most TMVR technologies under investigation use either a trans-apical or a trans-septal approach via dedicated multistep anchoring systems. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement offers several potential advantages over transcatheter repair, notably a greater and more sustained MR reduction. At the same time, significant engineering challenges and potential disadvantages must be acknowledged. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown promising results, demonstrating TMVR feasibility. Nevertheless, further development, testing, and trials are needed before considering TMVR as a definitive therapeutic option for MR in a wide range of anatomical scenarios.

[Mitral valve: When conservative, when surgical, when interventional therapy?]

The management of severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation is in contrast to the aortic-valve-intervention more challenging due to the complex mitral-valve anatomy. In primary mitral regurgitation surgical therapy is recommended, whereas there are various therapeutic options in secondary mitral regurgitation. Besides the established mitral-valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge-Repair (M-TEER) and the interventional annuloplasty - devices dynamic developments have recently been made in the field of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement-therapy (TMVR). This article surveys the current recommendations and available therapeutic options in mitral regurgitation.