Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: 1-Year Outcomes From the MiCLASP Study

BACKGROUND

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a guideline-recommended treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). Outcomes with the PASCAL system in a post-market setting have not been established.

OBJECTIVES

The authors report 30-day and 1-year outcomes from the MiCLASP (Transcatheter Repair of Mitral Regurgitation with Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System) European post-market clinical follow-up study.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic, clinically significant MR were prospectively enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was clinical events committee-adjudicated 30-day composite major adverse event rate and the primary effectiveness endpoint was echocardiographic core laboratory-assessed MR severity at discharge compared with baseline. Clinical, echocardiographic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes were assessed at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 544 patients were enrolled (59% functional MR, 30% degenerative MR). The 30-day composite major adverse event rate was 6.8%. MR reduction was significant from baseline to discharge and sustained at 1 year with 98% of patients achieving MR ≤2+ and 82.6% MR ≤1+ (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). One-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for survival was 87.3%, and freedom from heart failure hospitalization was 84.3%. Significant functional and quality-of-life improvements were observed at 1 year, including 71.6% in NYHA functional class I/II, 14.4-point increase in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and 24.2-m improvement in 6-minute walk distance (all P < 0.001 vs baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year outcomes of this large cohort from the MiCLASP study demonstrate continued safety and effectiveness of M-TEER with the PASCAL system in a post-market setting. Results demonstrate high survival and freedom from heart failure hospitalization, significant and sustained MR reduction, and improvements in symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life.

Comparative analysis of different risk prediction tools after mitral Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an established treatment for primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR). The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of different risk scores for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after TEER.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 206 patients treated for MR at a tertiary European center between 2011 and 2023 and compared the accuracy of different mitral and surgical risk scores: EuroSCORE II, GRASP, MITRALITY, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore, and STS for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in PMR and SMR. A subanalysis of SMR-only patients with the addition of COAPT Risk Score and baseline N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) list was also performed.

RESULTS

MITRALITY had the best discriminative ability for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.74, respectively, in a composed group of PMR and SMR. In a SMR-only population, MITRALITY also presented the best AUC for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with values of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MITRALITY was the best mitral TEER risk model for both 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in a population of PMR and SMR patients, as well as in SMR patients only. Surgical risk scores, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore and NT-proBNP alone showed poor predictive values.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: patient selection, current devices, and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Over the last two decades, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has become a safe and effective therapy for severe mitral regurgitation in patients deemed at high surgical risk.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to encompass the most relevant and updated evidence in the field of M-TEER from its inception, focusing on clinical and anatomical features for proper patient and device selection.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing operator experience and device iterations have resulted in improved clinical outcomes and an expansion of the therapy to patients with complex anatomies and clinical scenarios. Future investigations are warranted to determine the best management options and the most suitable device for every patient with MR.

MitraClip

Both the MitraClip and PASCAL systems offer transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) solutions for mitral regurgitation. Evidence indicates a lower technical success rate for TEER in complex degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) cases. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge therapy for primary mitral regurgitation with advanced anatomy, defined as mitral regurgitation effective regurgitant orifice area (MR-EROA) ≥0.40 cm2 or large flail gap (≥5 mm) or width (≥7 mm) or Barlow's disease, that completed follow-up after 1 year. Our criteria were met by 27 patients treated with PASCAL and 18 with MitraClip. All patients exhibited a significant, equivalent short-term reduction in MR-EROA, mitral regurgitation vena contracta diameter (MR-VCD), regurgitant volume, and clinical status. At 1 year follow-up, reductions in MR-VCD, regurgitant volume, and MR-EROA remained significant for both groups without significant differences between groups. MR-Grade ≤ 1+ was achieved in 18 (66.7%) and 10 (55.6%) patients, respectively. At follow-up, no difference in hospitalization for cardiac decompensation was observed. Overall death was similar in both groups. Our study suggests that both the PASCAL and MitraClip systems significantly reduce mitral regurgitation even in advanced degenerative diseases. Within our limited data, we found no evidence of inferior performance of the PASCAL system.

One-Year Outcomes According to Mitral Regurgitation Etiology Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair With the PASCAL System: Results From a Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

We previously reported procedural and 30-day outcomes of a German early multicenter experience with the PASCAL system for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). This study reports 1-year outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system according to MR etiology in a large all-comer cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes up to 1-year were investigated according to MR etiology (degenerative [DMR], functional [FMR], or mixed [MMR]) in the first 282 patients with symptomatic MR 3+/4+ treated with the PASCAL implant at 9 centers in 2019. A total of 282 patients were included (33% DMR, 50% FMR, 17% MMR). At discharge, MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was achieved in 58%/87% of DMR, in 75%/97% of FMR, and in 78%/98% of patients with MMR (P=0.004). MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was sustained at 30 days (50%/83% DMR, 67%/97% FMR, 74%/100% MMR) and at 1 year (53%/78% DMR, 75%/97% FMR, 67%/91% MMR) with significant differences between etiologies. DMR patients with residual MR 3+/4+ at 1-year had at least complex valve morphology in 91.7%. Valve-related reintervention was performed in 7.4% DMR, 0.7% FMR, and 0.0% MMR (P=0.010). At 1-year, New York Heart Association Functional Class was significantly improved irrespective of MR etiology (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large all-comer cohort, mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system was associated with an acute and sustained MR reduction at 1-year in all causes. However, in patients with DMR, MR reduction was less pronounced, reflecting the high incidence of complex or very complex anatomies being referred for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in mitral regurgitation: A comparison of device systems and recommendations for tailored device selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. The traditionally used device, MitraClip, showed both safety and effectiveness in M-TEER. PASCAL is a newer device that has emerged as another feasible option to be used in this procedure.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies that compared PASCAL to MitraClip devices in M-TEER. The electronic databases searched for relevant studies were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcomes were technical success and the grade of MR at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding, device success and reintervention.

RESULTS

Technical success (PASCAL: 96.5% vs MitraClip: 97.6%, p = 0.24) and MR ≤ 2 at 30-day follow-up (PASCAL: 89.4vs MitraClip 89.9%, p = 0.51) were comparable between both groups. Both devices showed similar outcomes including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68 [0.34, 1.38]; P = 0.28), major bleeding (RR: 1.87 [0.68, 5.10]; P = 0.22) and reintervention (RR: 1.02 [0.33, 3.16]; P = 0.97). Device success was more frequent with PASCAL device (PASCAL: 86% vs MitraClip 68.5%; P = 0.44), however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PASCAL were comparable to those of MitraClip with no significant difference in safety and effectiveness. The choice between MitraClip and PASCAL devices should be guided by various factors, including mitral valve anatomy, etiology of regurgitation, and device-specific characteristics.

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with PASCAL vs MitraClip: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using the MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) system has emerged as a standard treatment for patients with symptomatic severe secondary or inoperable primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The relatively recent approval of the PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System (Edwards Lifesciences) has expanded the options of TEER devices. However, evidence comparing PASCAL with MitraClip systems is still limited.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature research and meta-analysis in PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases for studies comparing PASCAL and MitraClip systems.

RESULTS

Four observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, involving 1315 patients total, were eligible for inclusion. All patients exhibited symptomatic (NYHA II-IV) MR grades 3+ or 4+. Baseline characteristics were comparable across all included studies. The clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium consensus. The procedural success rates for the 2 devices were comparable in terms of achieving post-procedural MR grades of less than or equal to 2+ and less than or equal to 1+. Furthermore, most patients improved their clinical status, with no significant differences between patients treated with PASCAL and those treated with MitraClip. In terms of safety, both procedures exhibited low overall mortality rates and occurrence of major adverse events (MAE), without significant difference between the 2 devices. These findings remained consistent in both short- and long-term follow-up assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed similar effectiveness and safety profiles between the PASCAL and MitraClip devices in patients experiencing significant symptomatic MR.

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with PASCAL Vs MitraClip: A aystematic teview and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using the MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) system has emerged as a standard treatment for patients with symptomatic severe secondary or inoperable primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The relatively recent approval of the PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System (Edwards Lifesciences) has expanded the options of TEER devices. However, evidence comparing PASCAL with MitraClip systems is still limited.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature research and meta-analysis in PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases for studies comparing PASCAL and MitraClip systems.

RESULTS

Four observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, involving 1315 patients total, were eligible for inclusion. All patients exhibited symptomatic (NYHA II-IV) MR grades 3+ or 4+. Baseline characteristics were comparable across all included studies. The clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium consensus. The procedural success rates for the 2 devices were comparable in terms of achieving post-procedural MR grades of less than or equal to 2+ and less than or equal to 1+. Furthermore, most patients improved their clinical status, with no significant differences between patients treated with PASCAL and those treated with MitraClip. In terms of safety, both procedures exhibited low overall mortality rates and occurrence of major adverse events (MAE), without significant difference between the 2 devices. These findings remained consistent in both short- and long-term follow-up assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed similar effectiveness and safety profiles between the PASCAL and MitraClip devices in patients experiencing significant symptomatic MR.

Clinical outcomes following tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with PASCAL: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) exhibit high morbidity and mortality. Tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) is a rapidly evolving strategy to address the unmet clinical need of severe TR therapies.

OBJECTIVE

Organize the current body of evidence on outcomes following use of the PASCAL (Edwards Lifesciences) system for T-TEER.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for keywords ["tricuspid"] and ["transcatheter" or "edge-to-edge"] and ["PASCAL" or "leaflet repair" or "valve repair"] from the database inception until January 11, 2023. Primary outcomes of interest were procedural success, mortality, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), and TR severity.

RESULTS

A total of 549 patients undergoing PASCAL or PASCAL Ace T-TEER were included. The mean age ranged from 71.0 to 80.3 years, with 25.0 to 63.6% females. The follow-up duration ranged from 30 days to 1 year. The success rate was 83.5% (409/490). There was improvement in symptoms based on NYHA classification (at 1- to 6-months; NYHA ≥3 RR 0.27 [95% CI 0.19-0.39]; p < 0.001) and 6MWD (at 1-month; 50.96 [95% CI 32.34-69.59]; p < 0.001) post-procedure. On imaging, there was improvement in TR severity post-procedure (at 1- to 12-months; ≥ severe TR 0.21 [95% CI 0.14-0.31]; p < 0.001), which remained significant with each study removed.

CONCLUSION

PASCAL for T-TEER is associated with high procedural success rates along with improvements in NYHA functional class, TR severity, 6MWD, and patient-reported outcomes.

Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for atrial functional mitral regurgitation: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) may have potential benefits in the treatment of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), but robust evidence is currently lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical outcomes of TEER for AFMR, including comparisons to ventricular functional MR (VFMR).

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through January 2023 to identify studies eligible for analysis. The primary outcome was postprocedural MR severity. Postprocedural New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class classification and all-cause mortality were also evaluated. Outcomes were stratified into short term (postprocedure to 6 months) and long term (6 months to 2 years).

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies met the inclusion criteria, enrolling 539 AFMR and 3486 VFMR patients. Postprocedural MR grade ≤2 in the AFMR group was observed in 93.7% (454/491 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI), 91.1%-96.2%, I2  = 24.3%) and 97.1% (89/93 patients; 95% CI, 92.9%-100%, I2  = 26.4%) in short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the rates of postprocedural MR grade ≤2 between AFMR and VFMR either in short-term (risk ratio [RR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.06]; p = 0.90; I2  = 53%) or long-term follow-up (RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.89-1.32]; p = 0.44; I2  = 22%). Similarly, no difference was observed between AFMR and VFMR in the rates of postprocedural NYHA class ≤2 or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

TEER provides similar clinical outcomes for AFMR and VFMR. A high rate of MR grade ≤2 was observed in patients at both short- and long-term follow-ups. Further prospective studies with TEER versus medical therapy and/or rhythm control for AFMR are warranted.

Alternative minimally invasive surgical explantation techniques for failed transcatheter mitral valve repair devices

Objective

The use of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) devices is increasing in elderly and high-risk patients. However, the increasing number of patients with recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) has confronted surgeons with the issue of how to explant the devices and whether the mitral valve should be repaired or replaced. The aim of the study is to summarize our clinical experience with the explantation of different TMVr devices and to provide alternative surgical techniques that can be performed in different clinical scenarios.

Methods

A simulator system including a dummy valve representing native valves was used to create video documentation and to develop alternative surgical methods for clip explantation. Moreover, the clip explantation techniques were shown in 2 patients undergoing minimally-invasive mitral valve repair after a failed TMVr.

Results

Alternative explantation techniques were described for each TMVr device; 2 techniques for MitraClip and 3 techniques for PASCAL (Precision Transcatheter Valve Repair System), which may be adjusted for each individual according to the underlying valve pathology and the degree of device encapsulation. The patients were discharged without residual MR and remained MR free at the follow-up.

Conclusions

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair devices can be surgically explanted without damaging the MV leaflets. Removal of each device may require a different technique tailored to the degree of device encapsulation and valve pathology. Increasing experience may facilitate repair in patients with recurrent MR after TMVr.

Comparison of costs associated with transcatheter mitral valve repair: PASCAL vs MitraClip in a real-world setting

AIMS

We aimed to conduct a clinical process cost analysis to evaluate all upcoming costs of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) treatment using the MitraClip and the PASCAL repair system.

METHODS

First, we prospectively enrolled 107 M-TEER patients treated with either the PASCAL or MitraClip system and compared all upcoming costs during the M-TEER procedure and the associated in-hospital stay. Second, we retrospectively analysed 716 M-TEER procedures with regard to the occurrence of complications and their associated costs. All materials used in the catheterization laboratory for the procedures were evaluated. The cost analysis considered various expenses, such as general in-hospital costs, device costs, catheter laboratory and material costs.

RESULTS

In the prospective study, 51 patients were treated using the PASCAL system, and 56 were treated using the MitraClip system. The two groups had comparable baseline characteristics and comorbidities. The total in-hospital costs were 25 414 (Interquartile range (IQR) 24 631, 27 697) € in the PASCAL group and 25 633 (IQR 24 752, 28 256) € in the MitraClip group (p = 0.515). The major cost driver was initial material expenditure, mostly triggered by device costs, which were similar to the PASCAL and MitraClip systems. Overall intensive care unit and general ward costs did not differ between the PASCAL and MitraClip groups. In the retrospective analysis, M-TEER-related complications were rare but were associated with higher costs, mainly due to prolonged hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

The major cost driver of M-TEER was the material expenditure, which was mostly triggered by high device costs. The costs of treating patients were similar for the PASCAL and MitraClip systems. M-TEER-related complications are associated with higher costs, mainly due to prolonged hospitalisation. This analysis provides valuable insights into reducing expenses by modifying the process of M-TEER.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation using PASCAL or MitraClip

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) using the PASCAL or MitraClip systems for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted for MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE, through February 2023, for studies comparing the clinical outcomes of MTEER using PASCAL versus MitraClip systems among patients with severe MR. The primary study outcome was residual MR ≤ 2 at discharge. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final analysis included six studies with a total of 1581 patients, with a weighted follow-up period of 3.5 months. Two studies only included patients with degenerative MR, while the remaining studies included both degenerative and functional MR. There was no significant difference in procedure duration between MTEER with the PASCAL or MitraClip systems. There was no difference in residual MR ≤ 2 at discharge (94.7% vs. 91.9%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-2.27) or residual MR ≤ 2 at the mid-term follow-up (94.6% vs. 91.0%, p = 0.05) among the PASCAL versus MitraClip systems. There was no difference between both groups in residual MR ≤ 1 at discharge (73.1% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.12), while there was greater incidence of residual MR ≤ 1 at midterm follow-up with the PASCAL system (71.3% vs. 56.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the PASCAL and MitraClip MTEER systems in technical success (97.0% vs. 97.9%, p = 0.15), procedural success (89.1% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.78), single leaflet detachment (1.8% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.55), or all-cause mortality (3.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, we demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety between the PASCAL and MitraClip MTEER systems at short- and mid-term assessments. Randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the comparative long-term outcomes between both MTEER systems.

Catheter ablation of concomitant atrial fibrillation improves survival of patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common concomitant disease in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation (MR) and detrimentally affects their outcome. While there is increasing evidence for prognostic improvement and safety of catheter ablation (CA) of AF in the overall cohort of heart failure patients, corresponding data in TEER patients are lacking.

Objectives

To investigate the impact of treatment regimens for concomitant AF on survival of TEER patients.

Methods

In a multicenter observational cohort study consecutive patients successfully undergoing TEER were analyzed and survival of patients receiving CA of concomitant AF was compared with that of patients on pharmacological AF treatment and with that of patients without a history of AF, using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

A total of 821 patients were analyzed. Of these, 608 (74.1%) had concomitant AF, of whom 48 patients received CA. Patients with CA in AF showed significantly higher 3-year-survival after TEER compared to PSM-patients on pharmacological AF treatment (75.5% [36/48] vs. 49.4% [166/336], p = 0.009). The 3-year-survival after TEER of patients with concomitant AF treated with CA was not significantly different from PSM-patients without AF (75.5% [36/48] vs. 68.3% [98/144], p = 0.36).

Conclusions

CA of AF is superior to pharmacotherapy as it significantly improves the survival of TEER patients in a PSM analysis. CA even offsets the prognostic disadvantage of coexisting AF in TEER patients. Given the growing evidence of prognostic benefits in the overall cohort of HF patients, our data point out the importance of treating concomitant AF and support CA as an essential part of a holistic management of TEER patients.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure: Current Advances in Diagnosis and Management

The causes of mitral regurgitation (MR) can be broadly divided into primary and secondary causes. Although primary MR is caused by degenerative alterations of the mitral valve and the mitral valve apparatus, secondary (functional) MR is multifactorial and related to dilation of the left ventricle and/or mitral annulus commonly resulting in concomitant restriction of the leaflets. Therefore, the treatment of secondary MR (SMR) is complex and includes guideline directed heart failure therapy along with surgical and transcatheter approaches that have shown effectiveness in certain subgroups. This review aims to provide insight into current advances in diagnosis and management of SMR.

MitraClip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve (MV) can be performed using the PASCAL or MitraClip devices. Few studies offer a head-to-head outcome comparison of these two devices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, from 1 January 2000 until 1 March 2023, were searched. Study protocol details were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023405400). Randomized Controlled Trials and observational studies reporting head-to-head clinical comparison of PASCAL and MitraClip devices were eligible for selection. Patients with severe functional or degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) who had undergone TEER of the MV with either PASCAL or MitraClip devices were included in the meta-analysis. Data from six studies (five observational and one randomized clinical trial) were extracted and analyzed. The main outcomes were a reduction in MR to 2+ or less, improvement of New York Heart Association (NYHA) and 30-day all-cause mortality. Peri-procedural mortality, success rate and adverse events were also compared.

RESULTS

Data from 785 and 796 patients that underwent TEER using PASCAL and MitraClip, respectively, were analyzed. Thirty-day all-cause mortality (Risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% CI 0.79-2.89), MR reduction to maximum 2+ (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02) and NYHA improvement (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.84-1.15) were similar in both device groups. Both devices had high and similar success rates (96.9% and 96.7% for the PASCAL and MitraClip group, respectively, p value = 0.91). MR reduction to 1+ or less at discharge was similar in both device groups (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.19). Composite peri-procedural and in-hospital mortality was 0.64% and 1.66% in the PASCAL and MitraClip groups, respectively (p value = 0.094). Rates of peri-procedural cerebrovascular accidents were 0.26% in PASCAL and 1.01% in MitraClip (p value = 0.108).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PASCAL and MitraClip devices have high success and low complication rates for TEER of the MV. PASCAL was not inferior to MitraClip in reducing the MR level at discharge.

1-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, thereby creating a significant need for a lower-risk transcatheter solution.

OBJECTIVES

The single-arm, multicenter, prospective CLASP TR (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System in Tricuspid Regurgitation [CLASP TR] Early Feasibility Study) evaluated 1-year outcomes of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system (Edwards Lifesciences) to treat TR.

METHODS

Study inclusion required a previous diagnosis of severe or greater TR and persistent symptoms despite medical treatment. An independent core laboratory evaluated echocardiographic results, and a clinical events committee adjudicated major adverse events. The study evaluated primary safety and performance outcomes, with echocardiographic, clinical, and functional endpoints. Study investigators report 1-year all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled: mean age of 77.4 years; 55.4% female; and 97.0% with severe to torrential TR. At 30 days, cardiovascular mortality was 3.1%, the stroke rate was 1.5%, and no device-related reinterventions were reported. Between 30 days and 1 year, there were an additional 3 cardiovascular deaths (4.8%), 2 strokes (3.2%), and 1 unplanned or emergency reintervention (1.6%). One-year postprocedure, TR severity significantly reduced (P < 0.001), with 31 of 36 (86.0%) patients achieving moderate or less TR; 100% had at least 1 TR grade reduction. Freedom from all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization by Kaplan-Meier analyses were 87.9% and 78.5%, respectively. Their New York Heart Association functional class significantly improved (P < 0.001) with 92% in class I or II, 6-minute walk distance increased by 94 m (P = 0.014), and overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores improved by 18 points (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PASCAL system demonstrated low complication and high survival rates, with significant and sustained improvements in TR, functional status, and quality of life at 1 year. (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System in Tricuspid Regurgitation [CLASP TR] Early Feasibility Study [CLASP TR EFS]; NCT03745313).

PASCAL repair system for patients with mitral regurgitation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve has emerged as the standard treatment for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) with high surgical risk. Even though MitraClip is widely used, the novel PASCAL device system offers distinct technical features. We aim to study the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL repair system in clinically significant MR.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE were searched for articles published from August 2016 until June 2022 to identify studies that investigated the safety and efficacy of PASCAL for patients with degenerative, functional and mixed MR. Primary performance endpoints were technical, device, and procedural successes. Primary safety endpoint was composite 30 day major adverse events (MAE). Secondary endpoints were MR grade at discharge and 30 days, 30 day postprocedural NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included twelve retrospective and prospective observational studies and one randomized controlled study consisting of 1028 patients with severe, symptomatic MR (NYHA III-IV: 84.0%, MR ≥ 3+: 99.7%) and high surgical risk (mean logistic EuroSCORE of 16.4).Technical success was 95.7%, procedural success was 95.2%, and device success was 86.1% relative to the weighted average. MR grade was ≤2+ in 94.7% of patients at discharge and 94.0% patients at 30-day follow-up. Mean 30-day and 12-month mortality after device implantation were 4.54% and 12.2%.

CONCLUSION

The PASCAL repair system appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option to treat severe, symptomatic MR in high surgical risk patients.

Cardio-hepatic syndrome in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair

AIMS

The impact of the cardio-hepatic syndrome (CHS) on outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for relevant mitral regurgitation (MR) is unknown. The objectives of this study were three-fold: (I) to characterize the pattern of hepatic impairment, (II) to investigate the prognostic value of CHS, and (III) to evaluate the changes in hepatic function after M-TEER.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hepatic impairment was quantified by laboratory parameters of liver function. In accordance with existing literature, two types of CHS were distinguished: Ischemic type I CHS (elevation of both transaminases) and cholestatic type II CHS (elevation of two out of three parameters of hepatic cholestasis). The impact of CHS on two-year mortality was evaluated using a Cox model. The change in hepatic function after M-TEER was assessed by laboratory testing at follow-up. We analyzed 1083 patients who underwent M-TEER for relevant primary or secondary MR at four European centers between 2008 and 2019. Ischemic type I and cholestatic type II CHS were observed in 11.1% and 23.0% of patients, respectively. Predictors for two-year all-cause mortality differed by MR etiology. While in primary MR cholestatic type II CHS was independently associated with two-year mortality, ischemic CHS type I was an independent mortality predictor in SMR patients. At follow-up, patients with MR reduction ≤2+ (obtained in 90.7% of patients) presented with improved parameters of hepatic function (median reduction of 0.2mg/dl, 0.2U/l and 21U/l for bilirubin, ALT and GGT, respectively, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CHS is frequently observed in patients undergoing M-TEER and significantly impairs two-year survival. Successful M-TEER may have beneficial effects on CHS.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in mitral regurgitation: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Within the past 15 years, mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has developed from an experimental approach to a guideline-recommended, safe, and effective treatment option for patients with severe primary or secondary mitral regurgitation.

AREAS COVERED

This review covered relevant publications of M-TEER and summarizes the development of M-TEER devices within the last 15 years. It outlines anatomical challenges which drove the evolution of M-TEER devices, provides an overview about the current state of clinical application and research, and offers an outlook into the future of transcatheter mitral valve treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The development and refinement of new M-TEER device generations offer the possibility to treat a wide range of mitral valve anatomies. Choosing the best device for the individual anatomic properties of the patients and considering comorbidities is the key to maximized MR reduction, minimalized complication rates, and thus optimized postinterventional prognosis. Independent from prognostic implications, quality of life has become an important patient-centered outcome that can be improved by M-TEER in virtually all patients treated.

Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Using MitraClip or PASCAL: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction in 2003, Abbott's MitraClip (MC) has become the most established catheter-based treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). Recent approval of Edwards Lifescience's PASCAL device has extended the field of TEER.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare the PASCAL and MC regarding procedural results and short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

METHODS

Data from 3 high-volume centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was residual MR at discharge. Secondary endpoints were technical success, MR reduction, and 30-day mortality. After 1 year, all-cause mortality and residual MR were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients (216 MC, 196 PASCAL) treated between 2018 and 2020 were included. A total of 184 patients (92 in each treatment group) remained after propensity score matching. The rate of baseline MR ≥3 was 98.9% in both groups (P = 1.00). Both TEER systems achieved equally high technical success rates (97.8%; P = 1.00), resulting in residual MR ≤1 in 69.6% vs 77.1% of patients (P = 0.24) and MR reduction by ≥2 grades in 83.7% vs 92.4% of patients (P = 0.13) using the MC and PASCAL, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% in both cohorts (P = 0.98), and 1-year follow-up showed similar MR reductions (residual MR ≤1, 78.0% with MC vs 82.3% with PASCAL; P = 0.70) and comparable all-cause mortality (14.1% with MC vs 6.5% with PASCAL; P = 0.14). In multivariate regression analysis, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score independently correlated with an optimal result (MR ≤1), while device choice did not show a significant impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective multicenter study, the established MC and the novel PASCAL mitral valve TEER systems were safe and offered excellent performance with comparable short- and long-term outcomes.

Early Outcomes of 2 Mitral Valve Transcatheter Leaflet Approximation Devices: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Comparison

BACKGROUND

In addition to the edge-to-edge MitraClip repair system, the edge-to-spacer PASCAL repair system was approved for percutaneous treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Comparative data are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare procedural and short-term safety and efficacy of 2 leaflet-based transcatheter mitral valve repair systems.

METHODS

Procedural and 30-day outcomes were investigated in a propensity score-matched cohort of 307 PASCAL and 307 MitraClip patients at 10 sites. Matching criteria included sex, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, MR etiology, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left atrial volume index, and vena contracta width. The primary efficacy endpoints were technical success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

Technical success was 97.0% in the PASCAL group and 98.0% in the MitraClip group (P = 0.624). MR ≤2+ at discharge was comparable in both groups (PASCAL: 93.8% vs MitraClip: 92.4%; P = 0.527), with more patients exhibiting MR ≤1+ in the PASCAL group (70.5% vs 56.6%; P < 0.001). The postprocedural mean gradient was significantly higher in the MitraClip group (3.3 ± 1.5 mm Hg vs 3.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg; P < 0.001). At 30 days, all-cause mortality and MAE rates were similar (mortality: 1.7% vs 3.3%; P = 0.299; MAE: 3.9% vs 5.2%; P = 0.562).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first large propensity score-matched comparison, procedural success rates and MAE did not differ significantly between patients treated with the PASCAL or MitraClip valve repair system. Procedural results with less than moderate MR and no elevated transmitral gradient were more common in the PASCAL group, which might have an impact on long-term outcome.

Transcatheter valve repair of tricuspid regurgitation with the PASCAL system: TriCLASP study 30-day results

BACKGROUND

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous transcatheter approaches may offer an alternative for patients not amenable to surgery.

METHODS

TriCLASP is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter European post-market clinical follow-up study (NCT04614402) to evaluate the safety and performance of the PASCAL system (Edwards Lifesciences) in patients with severe or greater TR. At 30 days, a composite of major adverse events (MAEs) adjudicated by a clinical events committee, echocardiographic parameters adjudicated by core laboratory, and clinical, functional, and quality-of-life measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 74 enrolled patients was 80.3 years, with 58.1% female, 90.5% systemic hypertension, and 77.0% in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. Mean Society for Thoracic Surgeons score (MV repair) was 9.0%. TR severity was significantly reduced at discharge (p < 0.001) and sustained at 30 days (p < 0.001), and 90.0% of patients achieved ≤moderate TR. The composite MAE rate at 30 days was 3.0%, including 4 events in 2 patients: cardiovascular mortality 1.5%, stroke 1.5%, renal complications requiring unplanned dialysis or renal replacement therapy 1.5%, and severe bleeding 1.5%. There were no nonelective tricuspid valve reinterventions, major access site and vascular complications, major cardiac structural complications, or device embolizations. NYHA class I/II was achieved in 55.8%, 6-minute walk distance improved by 38.2 m (p < 0.001), and Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire scores improved by 13.4 points (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Experience with the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in a European post-market setting confirms favorable safety and effectiveness at 30 days. TR significantly reduced, and clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes significantly improved. This study is ongoing. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is ongoing and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04614402. The current analysis is an interim report.

Right ventricular function in transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair

Since transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become a valuable therapy in the treatment of both, mitral (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the question of optimized patient selection has gained growing importance. After years of attributing rather little attention to the right ventricle (RV) and its function in the setting of valvular heart failure, this neglect has recently changed. The present review sought to summarize anatomy and function of the RV in a clinical context and aimed at presenting the current knowledge on how the RV influences outcomes after TEER for atrioventricular regurgitation. The anatomy of the RV is determined by its unique shape, which necessitates to use three-dimensional imaging methods for detailed and comprehensive characterization. Complex parameters such as RV to pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAc) have been developed to combine information of RV function and afterload which is primary determined by the pulmonary vasculature and LV filling pressure. Beyond that, TR, which is closely related to RV function also plays an important role in the setting of TEER. While mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) leads to reduction of concomitant TR in some patients, the prognostic value of TR in the setting of M-TEER remains unclear. Overall, this review summarizes the current state of knowledge of the outstanding role of RV function and associated TR in the setting of TEER and outlines the unsolved questions associated with right-sided heart failure.

One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Aims

Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER.

Methods and results

Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

German Multicenter Experience With a New Leaflet-Based Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System for Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the procedural and short-term safety and efficacy of a new leaflet-based transcatheter mitral valve repair system.

BACKGROUND

The PASCAL repair system has been recently approved for percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). Novel characteristics are broad paddles positioned around a central spacer and the ability for independent leaflet capture.

METHODS

Procedural and 30-day outcomes were investigated in the first 309 patients with symptomatic MR 3+/4+ treated with the PASCAL repair system at 10 sites. Primary efficacy endpoints were technical success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

Among the 309 patients (mean age 77 ± 10 years, 42% women, mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score 5.8 ± 4.5%) included in this study, MR etiology was degenerative in 33%, functional in 52%, and mixed in 16%. Eighty-six percent of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The technical success rate was 96%. Of 308 patients discharged alive, MR was ≤2+ in 93.5%. At 30 days, the MAE rate was 4.1%, with an estimated all-cause mortality rate of 2.0%, and 72% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class ≤II (p < 0.001). Rates of device success and CLASP (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study) trial-defined clinical success were 81.9% and 86.9%, respectively. Single-leaflet device attachment occurred in 7 patients (2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair with the PASCAL system in the early post-approval phase was effective and safe, with high procedural success rates and low rates of MAE. MR was significantly reduced, accompanied by significant improvement in functional status.

Feasibility Study of the Transcatheter Valve Repair System for Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent disease with limited treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

This is the first 30-day report of the U.S. single-arm, multicenter, prospective CLASP TR early feasibility study of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in the treatment of TR.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic TR despite optimal medical therapy, reviewed by the local heart team and central screening committee, were eligible for the study. Data were collected at baseline, discharge, and the 30-day follow-up and were reviewed by an independent clinical events committee and echocardiographic core laboratory. Feasibility endpoints included safety (composite major adverse event [MAE] rate), echocardiographic, clinical, and functional endpoints.

RESULTS

Of the 34 patients enrolled in the study, the mean age was 76 years, 53% were women, the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.3%, 88% had atrial fibrillation/flutter, 97% had severe or greater TR, and 79% had New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV symptoms. Twenty-nine patients (85%) received implants; at 30 days, 85% of them achieved a TR severity reduction of at least 1 grade, with 52% with moderate or less TR (p < 0.001). The MAE rate was 5.9%, and none of the patients experienced cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal complication, or reintervention. Eighty-nine percent of the patients improved to NYHA functional class I/II (p < 0.001), the mean 6-min walk distance improved by 71 m (p < 0.001), and the mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved by 15 points (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this early experience, the repair system performed as intended, with substantial TR reduction, favorable safety results with a low MAE rate, no mortality or reintervention, and significant improvements in functional status, exercise capacity, and quality of life. (Edwards CLASP TR EFS [CLASP TR EFS]; NCT03745313).

1-Year Outcomes for Transcatheter Repair in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation From the CLASP Study

OBJECTIVES

The authors report the CLASP (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study) expanded experience, 1-year outcomes, and analysis by functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).

BACKGROUND

The 30-day results from the CLASP study of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system for clinically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) have been previously reported.

METHODS

Eligible patients had symptomatic MR ≥3+, were receiving optimal medical therapy, and were deemed candidates for transcatheter mitral repair by the local heart team. Primary endpoints included procedural success, clinical success, and major adverse event rate at 30 days. Follow-up was continued to 1 year.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients were treated (67% FMR, 33% DMR); the mean age was 75.5 years, and 57% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. At 30 days, there was 1 cardiovascular death (0.9%), MR ≤1+ was achieved in 80% of patients (77% FMR, 86% DMR) and MR ≤2+ in 96% (96% FMR, 97% DMR), 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, 6-min walk distance had improved by 28 m, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score had improved by 16 points (p < 0.001 for all). At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier survival was 92% (89% FMR 96% DMR) with 88% freedom from heart failure hospitalization (80% FMR, 100% DMR), MR was ≤1+ in 82% of patients (79% FMR, 86% DMR) and ≤2+ in 100% of patients, 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score had improved by 14 points (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system demonstrated a low complication rate and high survival, with robust sustained MR reduction accompanied by significant improvements in functional status and quality of life at 1 year. (The CLASP Study Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study [CLASP]; NCT03170349).

Feasibility of a Novel Transcatheter Valve Repair System to Treat Tricuspid Regurgitation in ccTGA

Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) with significant systemic tricuspid valve regurgitation and systemic right ventricular dysfunction have prohibitive surgical risk in adulthood. The PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system enables minimally invasive percutaneous tricuspid valve repair in the complex anatomy of patients with ccTGA. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

2-Year Outcomes for Transcatheter Repair in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation From the CLASP Study

OBJECTIVES

This study reports 2-year outcomes from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm CLASP study with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative MR (DMR) analysis.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter repair is a favorable option to treat MR. Long-term prognostic impact of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR remains to be established.

METHODS

Patients had clinically significant MR ≥3+ as evaluated by the echocardiographic core laboratory and were deemed candidates for transcatheter repair by the heart team. Assessments were performed by clinical events committee to 1 year (site-reported thereafter) and core laboratory to 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients (69% FMR, 31% DMR) were enrolled with a mean age of 75 years, 56% were male, 60% were New York Heart Association functional class III to IVa, and 100% had MR ≥3+. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 80% survival (72% FMR, 94% DMR) and 84% freedom from heart failure (HF) hospitalization (78% FMR, 97% DMR), with 85% reduction in annualized HF hospitalization rate (81% FMR, 98% DMR). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 78% of patients (84% FMR, 71% DMR) and MR ≤2+ was achieved in 97% (95% FMR, 100% DMR) (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by 33 ml (p < 0.001); 93% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I to II (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PASCAL repair system demonstrated sustained favorable outcomes at 2 years in FMR and DMR patients. Results showed high survival and freedom from HF rehospitalization rates with a significantly reduced annualized HF hospitalization rate. Durable MR reduction was achieved with evidence of left ventricular reverse remodeling and significant improvement in functional status. The CLASP IID/IIF randomized pivotal trial is ongoing.

Early outcomes from the CLASP IID trial roll-in cohort for prohibitive risk patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

We report the 30-day outcomes from the roll-in cohort of the CLASP IID trial, representing the first procedures performed by each site.

BACKGROUND

The currently enrolling CLASP IID/IIF pivotal trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial assessing the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR. The trial allows for up to three roll-in patients per site.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were: DMR ≥3+, prohibitive surgical risk, and deemed suitable for transcatheter repair by the local heart team. Trial oversight included a central screening committee and echocardiographic core laboratory. The primary safety endpoint was a 30-day composite MAE: cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), new need for renal replacement therapy, severe bleeding, and non-elective mitral valve re-intervention, adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. Thirty-day echocardiographic, functional, and quality of life outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 roll-in patients with mean age of 83 years and 69% in NYHA class III/IV were treated. Successful implantation was achieved in 100%. The 30-day composite MAE rate was 8.9% including one cardiovascular death (2.2%) due to severe bleeding from a hemorrhagic stroke, one MI, and no need for re-intervention. MR≤1+ was achieved in 73% and ≤2+ in 98% of patients. 89% of patients were in NYHA class I/II (p < .001) with improvements in 6MWD (30 m; p = .054) and KCCQ (17 points; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early results representing sites with first experience with the PASCAL repair system showed favorable 30-day outcomes in patients with DMR≥3+ at prohibitive surgical risk.

Bail-out edge-to-edge mitral repair for an acute single leaflet device attachment: a case report

Background

An acute single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) may occur during transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TMVr), if an inadequate grasping of the target leaflet and/or a leaflet injury are concomitant. The bail-out TMVr often fails due to the complex pathophysiology.

Case summary

We report a case of an acute SLDA after TMVr with the PASCAL Repair System for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) with mixed aetiology, i.e., a thin-appeared posterior leaflet and pseudo-prolapse of the anterior mitral leaflet due to mitral annular dilatation. An acute SLDA occurred 2 min after the deployment, with device detachment of the posterior leaflet. A bail-out TMVr with the MitraClip XTR system led to an optimal MR reduction with the PASCAL stabilized. Despite an adequate leaflet insertion of the 1st device achieved, the posterior leaflet was tear due to its fragile tissue characteristics. At discharge, echocardiography confirmed an optimal MR reduction to mild grade with both devices stabilized.

Discussion

The pathology of the mitral valve leaflet is essential to achieve successful TMVr procedure using edge-to-edge repair device. Since the mechanical stress to the target leaflet appears to vary according to the edge-to-edge repair devices, the leaflet tissue characteristics should be respected during device selection.

State of the Art: Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Complex Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has revolutionized the treatment of primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. The landmark EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study) and COAPT (Clinical Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for High Surgical Risk Patients) trials included only clinically stable patients with favorable mitral valve anatomy for edge-to-edge repair. However, since its initial commercial approval in the United States, growing operator experience, device iterations, and improvements in intraprocedural imaging have led to an expansion in the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair to more complex mitral valve pathologies and clinical scenarios, many of which were previously considered contraindications for the procedure. Because patients with prohibitive surgical risk are often older and present with complex mitral valve disease, knowledge of the potential effectiveness, versatility, and technical approach to a broad range of anatomy is clinically relevant. In this review the authors examine the current experience with mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in various pathologies and scenarios that go well beyond the EVEREST II trial inclusion criteria.

PASCAL mitral valve repair system versus MitraClip: comparison of transcatheter edge-to-edge strategies in complex primary mitral regurgitation

Background

The PASCAL system is a novel device for edge-to-edge treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL to the MitraClip system in a highly selected group of patients with complex primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) defined as effective regurgitant orifice area (MR-EROA) ≥ 0.40 cm², large flail gap (≥ 5 mm) or width (≥ 7 mm) or Barlow’s disease.

Methods

38 patients with complex PMR undergoing mitral intervention using PASCAL (n = 22) or MitraClip (n = 16) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoints were procedural success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The rate of major adverse events (MAE) according to the Mitral Valve Academic Consortium (MVARC) criteria was chosen as the primary safety endpoint.

Results

Patient collectives did not differ relevantly regarding pertinent baseline parameters. Patients` median age was 83.0 [77.5–85.3] years (PASCAL) and 82.5 [76.5–86.5] years (MitraClip). MR-EROA at baseline was 0.70 [0.68–0.83] cm² (PASCAL) and 0.70 [0.50–0.90] cm² (MitraClip), respectively. 3D-echocardiographic morphometry of the mitral valve apparatus revealed no relevant differences between groups. Procedural success was achieved in 95.5% (PASCAL) and 87.5% (MitraClip), respectively. In 86.4% of the patients a residual MR grade ≤ 1 + was achieved with PASCAL whereas reduction to MR grade ≤ 1 + with MitraClip was achieved in 62.5%. Neither procedure time number of implanted devices, nor transmitral gradient differed significantly. No periprocedural MAE according to MVARC occured.

Conclusion

In this highly selected patient group with complex PMR both systems exhibited equal procedural safety. MitraClip and PASCAL reduced qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters of MR to an at least comparable extent.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01845-8.

12-Month outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair with the PASCAL system for severe tricuspid regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the durability of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) reduction and the clinical outcomes through 12 months after transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) with the PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System.

BACKGROUND

TTVr has rapidly developed and demonstrated favorable acute outcomes, but longer follow-up data are needed.

METHODS

Overall, 30 patients (age 77 ± 6 years; 57% female) received PASCAL implantation from September 2017 to May 2019 and completed a clinical follow-up at 12 months.

RESULTS

The TR etiology was functional in 25 patients (83%), degenerative in three (10%), and mixed in two (7%). All patients had TR severe or greater (massive or torrential in 80%) and heart failure symptoms (90% in NYHA III or IV) under optimal medical treatment. Single-leaflet device attachment occurred in two patients. Moderate or less TR was achieved in 23/28 patients (82%) at 30 days, which was sustained at 12 months (86%). Two patients underwent repeat TTVr due to residual torrential TR (day 173) and recurrence of severe TR (day 280), respectively. One-year survival rate was 93%; 6 patients required rehospitalization due to acute heart failure. NYHA functional class I or II was achieved in 90% and 6-minute walk distance improved from 275 ± 122 m at baseline to 347 ± 112 m at 12-month (+72 ± 82 m, p < .01). There was no stroke, endocarditis, or device embolization during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve-month outcomes from this multicenter compassionate use experience with the PASCAL System demonstrated high procedural success, acceptable safety, and significant clinical improvement.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome and factor VIII in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair

Background and Hypothesis

The acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS), which predisposes to bleeding events, is often related to valvular heart diseases. We investigated possible implications of AvWS and factor VIII levels in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR).

Methods and Results

123 patients with moderate to severe MR were prospectively enrolled. Complete measurements of von Willebrand Factor activity (vWFAct), von Willebrand Factor antigen (vWFAg), and factor VIII expression before and 4 weeks after TMVR were available in 85 patients. At baseline, seven patients had a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, two patients suffered bleeding events during their hospital stay, and one patient had a bleeding 4 weeks after TMVR. Even though vWFAct, vWFAct/vWFAg ratio and vWFAg values did not change after TMVR, we observed a significantly lower vWFAct/vWFAg ratio in patients with primary MR as compared to patients with secondary MR both at baseline (p = 0.022) and 4 weeks following the TMVR procedure (p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with a mean mitral valve gradient ≥4 mmHg after TMVR had significantly lower vWFAct/vWFAg ratios as compared to patients with a mean mitral valve gradient <4 mmHg (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

MR of primary etiology was associated with lower vWFAct/vWFAg ratio, hinting toward HMWM loss due to shear stress caused by eccentric regurgitation jets. In addition, morphological changes leading to postprocedural transmitral gradients ≥4 mmHg were related to lower vWFAct/vWFAg ratio 4 weeks after the procedure. Alterations of the vWFAct/vWFAg ratio in turn did not translate into a greater risk for bleeding events.

PASCAL versus MitraClip-XTR edge-to-edge device for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity-matched analysis

Background

Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) is a promising technique for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Data comparing the performance of novel edge-to-edge devices (PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR) are scarce.

Methods

We identified 80 consecutive patients who underwent TTVR using either the PASCAL or MitraClip-XTR system to treat symptomatic TR from July 2018 to June 2020. To adjust for baseline imbalances, we performed a propensity score (PS) 1:1 matching. The primary endpoint was a reduction in TR severity by at least one grade at 30 days.

Results

The PS-matched cohort (n = 44) was at high-surgical risk (EuroSCORE II: 7.5% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8–12.1%]) with a mean TR grade of 4.3 ± 0.8 and median coaptation gap of 6.2 mm [IQR 3.2–9.1 mm]. The primary endpoint was similarly observed in both groups (PASCAL: 91% vs. MitraClip-XTR: 96%). Multiple device implantation was the most common form (59% vs. 82%, p = 0.19), and the occurrence of SLDA was comparable between the PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR system (5.7% [2 of 35 implanted devices] vs. 4.4% [2 of 45 implanted devices], p = 0.99). No periprocedural death or conversions to surgery occurred, and 30-day mortality (5.0% vs. 5.0%, log-rank p = 0.99) and 3-month mortality (10.0% vs. 5.0%, log-rank p = 0.56) were similar between both groups. During follow-up, functional NYHA class, 6-min walking distance, and health status improved in both groups.

Conclusions

Both TTVR devices, PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR, appeared feasible and comparable for an effective TR reduction. Randomized head-to-head comparisons will help to further define the appropriate scope of application of each system.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-020-01784-w.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention: Coaptation Devices

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as an alternative for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Multiple percutaneous devices have been developed in the last decade with promising early results. Among them, the coaptation devices are designed to reduce TR severity by valve leaflet plication or occupying the regurgitant orifice with a spacer. To date, the MitraClip/TriClip devices (Abbott, Santa Clara, CA, USA), the PASCAL system (Edwards Lifesciencies, Irvine, CA, USA), and the FORMA device (Edwards Lifesciencies, Irvine, CA, USA) have been used as coaptation devices for treating severe TR. The present document aimed to review the clinical evidence on coaptation devices in the field of TTVI, describing its design characteristics, main procedural steps, and early and mid-term outcomes.