Pre-discharge and early post-discharge management of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: A scientific statement by the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Heart failure outpatient clinics resources in Italy: a viewpoint of Italian Society of Cardiology organization

The current paper reports the model organization, level of health care, and type of medical and research activities related to the existing heart failure centers of the Italian Society of Cardiology. Of note, we conduced an internal survey among the members of heart failure working group and related hospital and territorial sites about the quality of care and assistance levels according to the local hospital resources and type of diagnostic therapeutic and management resources. Thirty-two hospital ambulatorial structures have been identified, the centers were equally distributed within the national ground, with similar concentration between north and south regions of the Italian country. We distinguished three different levels of organization: (1) basal territorial clinics in which patients with suspected or already diagnosed heart failure (HF) are initially identified and screened; (2) intermediate clinics in which HF patients can be routinary followed by HF specialists supported by a dedicated staff including imaging and arrythmologist experts, and interventional cardiologist; (3) advanced clinics composed by all the technical and staff resources capable of guarantying repetitive invasive assessment, continuous invasive monitoring, dedicated telemedicine structures focused on more advanced HF management integrated by heart transplantation or mechanical assistance programs. Different type of assistance is supported by a relevant number of research activity primarily conducted by the Italian Society of Cardiology or spontaneous studies arranged by HF specialist members. The number of HF centers has increased over the past few decades in proportion to the progressive rise in HF diagnoses and associated hospitalization. The expansion of ambulatory structures has been facilitated by an increasing socioeconomic and research influence. The quality of HF services in Italy could be raised by improving the network and connections between HF specialists, general practitioners (GPs), caregivers, and other specialists frequently working in this field.

Describing the use of remote dielectric sensing and handheld ultrasound in assessing lung congestion in heart failure patients within a primary care setting

Thorough consideration of user experiences and the weighing of advantages and disadvantages are essential when implementing new technology in clinical practice. This article describes a primary care nurse's experience using two technologies to monitor lung congestion in six patient cases: a remote dielectric sensing device for non-invasive lung fluid measurement and a portable handheld ultrasound device. Both can support decision-making when assessing lung congestion in heart failure patients. However, technical difficulties and interpretational complexities are inherent in their use. Balancing these advantages and disadvantages and finding effective strategies to address challenges is crucial for successful clinical implementation.

Inpatient Use of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy During Heart Failure Hospitalizations Among Community-Based Health Systems

BACKGROUND

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains underused. Acute heart failure (HF) hospitalization represents a critical opportunity for rapid initiation of evidence-based medications. However, data on GDMT use at discharge are mostly derived from national quality improvement registries.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe contemporary GDMT use patterns across HF hospitalizations at community-based health systems.

METHODS

The authors identified HF hospitalizations from 2016 to 2022 in a U.S. database aggregating deidentified electronic health record data from more than 30 health systems. In-hospital and discharge rates of GDMT use were reported for eligible HFrEF patients. Factors associated with inpatient GDMT use and predischarge discontinuation were evaluated with the use of multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 20,387 HF hospitalizations among 13,729 HFrEF patients were identified. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were administered during 70%, 86%, and 37% of eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were used in 17% and 8% of eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Discharge GDMT rates were low. Triple/quadruple therapy was administered in 26% of hospitalizations, falling to 14% on discharge. Predischarge GDMT discontinuations were associated with inpatient hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, but 43%-57% had no medical contraindications. In adjusted analyses, use of 3 or more GDMT classes was associated with fewer 90-day all-cause deaths and HF readmissions compared with less comprehensive GDMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient GDMT use in a national analysis of HF hospitalizations was lower than reported in quality improvement registries. High discontinuation rates emphasize an unmet need for inpatient and postdischarge strategies to optimize GDMT use.

Medically Tailored Meals in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2013-2023

BACKGROUND

Dietary interventions have potential to improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), but there are barriers to eating nutrient-dense diets. One strategy to address challenges is to provide medically tailored meals (MTMs), fully prepared meals that align with an individual's nutritional needs. In this systematic review, we examined clinical outcomes of studies that provided MTMs to patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched CINAH, EBSCO/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify MTM interventions published between 2013 and 2023. We included six studies. Five studies involved sodium restriction. Four of these were randomized control trials and one was a matched cohort study. Sample sizes ranged from 31 to 641. Patient populations included individuals who had heart failure, acute decompensated heart failure and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. One study involved energy restriction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity. This was a randomized controlled study with a sample size of 100. Sodium-restriction interventions, when aligned with Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension goals, reduced 90-day HF readmissions in one study and trended towards improving 30-day and 12-week HF readmissions in another. The energy-restriction intervention reduced diastolic blood pressure, weight, and inflammatory biomarkers, and improved quality of life (QoL) and cardiorespiratory fitness. Neither intervention had an impact on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of sodium-restricted MTMs to patients with HF may reduce the risk of rehospitalization. Provision of energy-restricted MTMs to patients with HF and obesity can improve symptoms, weight loss, QoL, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these effects and investigate underlying mechanisms.

Implementation of guideline-recommended medical therapy for patients with heart failure in Europe

Physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended heart failure (HF) treatment remains suboptimal, especially regarding the target doses. In particular, there is evidence that non-cardiologists are less compliant with HF guideline recommendations. This is likely to have a detrimental impact on patients' survival, readmissions and quality of life. Thus, the present document aims to address the reasons underlying low implementation and under-dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy in HF and to update a guidance for the initiation and rapid titration of HF drugs. In particular, aim of this document is to provide practical indications for drug implementation, to be applied not only by cardiologists but also by GPs and internal medicine doctors.

Inferior vena CAVA and lung ultraSound-guided therapy in acute heart failure: A randomized pilot study (CAVAL US-AHF study)

BACKGROUND

The optimal assessment of systemic and lung decongestion during acute heart failure is not clearly defined. We evaluated whether inferior vena cava (IVC) and pulmonary ultrasound (CAVAL US) guided therapy is superior to standard care in reducing subclinical congestion at discharge in patients with AHF.

METHODS

CAVAL US-AHF was an investigator-initiated, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. A daily quantitative ultrasound protocol using the 8-zone method was used and treatment was adjusted according to an algorithm. The primary endpoint was the presence of more than 5 B-lines and/or an increase in IVC diameter and collapsibility at discharge. And secondary endpoint exploratory outcome was the composite of readmission for HF, unplanned visit for worsening HF or death at 90 days RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to CAVAL US (n = 30) or control (n = 30). The primary endpoint was achieved in 4 patients (13.3%) in the CAVAL US group and 20 patients (66.6%) in the control group (P < .001). A significant reduction in HF readmission, unplanned visit for worsening HF or death at 90 days was seen in the CAVAL US group (13.3% vs 36.7%; log rank P = .038). Other endpoints such as NT-proBNP reduction at discharge showed a nonstatistically significant reduction in the CAVAL US group (48% IQR 27-67 vs 37% -3-59; P = .09). Safety outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

IVC and lung ultrasound-guided therapy in AHF patients significantly reduced subclinical congestion at discharge. CAVAL US-AHF provides preliminary evidence for the potential use of a simple technique to guide decongestive therapy during hospitalization for AHF, which may reduce the composite outcome at 90 days.

Ventricular arrhythmias in acute heart failure: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher intra-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of pre-hospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centres capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in patients with chronic heart failure. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.

Using augmented intelligence to improve long term outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For augmented intelligence (AI) tools to realize their potential, critical care clinicians must ensure they are designed to improve long-term outcomes. This overview is intended to align professionals with the state-of-the art of AI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many AI tools are undergoing preliminary assessment of their ability to support the care of survivors and their caregivers at multiple time points after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. The domains being studied include early identification of deterioration (physiological, mental), management of impaired physical functioning, pain, sleep and sexual dysfunction, improving nutrition and communication, and screening and treatment of cognitive impairment and mental health disorders.Several technologies are already being marketed and many more are in various stages of development. These technologies mostly still require clinical trials outcome testing. However, lacking a formal regulatory approval process, some are already in use.

SUMMARY

Plans for long-term management of ICU survivors must account for the development of a holistic follow-up system that incorporates AI across multiple platforms. A tiered post-ICU screening program may be established wherein AI tools managed by ICU follow-up clinics provide appropriate assistance without human intervention in cases with less pathology and refer severe cases to expert treatment.

Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in the new era of heart failure treatment

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is one of the leading causes of mortality and hospitalization in cardiovascular patients. Guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in the current era includes novel medications such as ARNI and SGLT2 inhibitors, as well as an approach to treatment based on clinical phenotypes. To assess prognostic factors for mortality and hospital readmissions plays a crucial role in patient care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the rate of 90-day post-discharge events in patients having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and investigate the associated clinical factors.

METHOD

A prospective study was conducted on 110 HFrEF patients at the cardiology department of Cho Ray Hospital. The 90-day events included all-cause mortality and rehospitalization due to heart failure.

RESULTS

The rate of 90-day events was 45.6%. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, NT-proBNP level ≥ 1858 pg/mL was identified as an independent factor associated with the 90-day events.

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP cut-off ≥ 1858 pg/mL can be used for the prognosis of 90-day events in HFrEF.

Safety and efficacy of early beta-blocker initiation in acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The beta-blocker (BB) initiation in acute heart failure (AHF) patients is still controversial. Some show the benefit of BB employment in decreasing the mortality outcome. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of in-hospital and long-term outcomes of BB initiation in AHF hospitalized patients. We searched multiple databases examining the outcome of AHF patients who had administered BB as the therapy initiation. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, composite endpoint after BB initiation when hospitalized, and post-discharge all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were adverse events after in-hospital BB initiation, including hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia after BB initiation when hospitalization and rehospitalization.

RESULTS

Eight cohort studies with 16,639 patients suffering from AHF and cardiogenic shock, with 9923 participants allocated to the early BB group and 6,713 patients in the control group. The follow-up durations ranged from 2 to 24 months. Early BB administration significantly reduced in-hospital composite endpoints (RR: 0.42; 95% CI (0.30-0.58); p < 0.001), in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR: 0.43; 95% CI (0.31-0.61); p < 0.001), discharge mortality (RR: 0.51; 95% CI (0.41-0.63); p < 0.001), and rehospitalization (RR: 0.57; 95% CI (0.44-0.74); p < 0.001). There were no discernible differences in in-hospital BB-related adverse events between the two groups (p = 0.13). Subgroup analyses conducted on AHF patients presenting with cardiogenic shock revealed no significant differences in in-hospital composite endpoint and in-hospital mortality, and similar results were shown in the naive BB population.

CONCLUSIONS

The BB initiation in AHF patients shows advantages in efficacy and safety outcome.

Propelling Nurse-Led Structured Intervention to Enhance Self-Care among Patients with Chronic Heart Failure (PROACT-HF): A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Heart Failure (HF) is a common chronic disease that has a high readmission rate and is associated with worsening symptoms and major financial impacts. Disease management implemented during or after an HF hospitalization has been shown to reduce hospitalization and mortality rates. Particularly for outpatients, it is necessary to provide self-care interventions. Structured nurse-led support such as timely follow-ups, including phone calls, is beneficial for improving self-care assessments. Evidence for nurse-led support has been investigated but is less than conclusive. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a nurse-led structured intervention for outpatients with chronic HF against the usual medical care in terms of self-care behaviors and occurrence of symptom exacerbation or rehospitalization.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a cluster-randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 facilities with certified HF nurses will be allocated to two-arm clusters at a 1:1 ratio, randomly to the intervention or usual care arms. A total of 210 participants will be assigned from the hospital. Participants will be adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with chronic HF who are classified as Stage C according to the ACCF/AHA Heart Failure staging system. In the intervention group, patients will receive structured nursing support. This begins with weekly support, including phone calls, for the first month, then transitions to monthly support thereafter. The aim is to ensure the stability of their living conditions, promote medication adherence, and encourage self-management. In the control group, patients will receive the usual care. Primary outcomes will assess the improvement or continuation of self-care behavior as measured by changes in EHFScBS (European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale) scores. Secondary outcomes include occurrence of readmission within 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after discharge, duration of home care until readmission, and blood levels of BNP and NT-proBNP.

Effect of implementing of the IDEAL discharge model on satisfaction of patient referred to trauma emergency department

BACKGROUND

Patient education at the time of discharge is one of the most important challenges in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the Effect of implementing the IDEAL, or integrated discharge model, on the satisfaction of patients referred to the trauma emergency department.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was conducted on the patients referred to the trauma emergency department of Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran. Eighty-six patients were recruited from January 20, 2023, until July 30, 2023. In the intervention group, the educational content was taught using the IDEAL (Inclusion, Discussion, Education, Assessment, Listening) or integrated discharge model, and in the control group, it was taught using the emergency department routine method. The satisfaction questionnaire of the emergency department was completed before and after the education in both groups and compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed by using SPSS (version 20) software.

RESULTS

The results showed that out of the 86 participating patients, 52 (60.5%) were male and 34 (39.5%), with a mean (Standard Deviation) of 39.14 (10.89) years old. Demographic characteristics were homogeneous between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean (standard deviation) of satisfaction of the participants after education, totally was 63.56 (16.21), in the intervention group it was 77.37 (7.95), and in the Control group it was 49.74 (8.84). The mean (SD) participants satisfaction on arrival at the emergency department in the intervention group was 19.16 (2.75) and in the control group was 13.51 (2.51), during hospitalization in the intervention group was 10.72 (1.77) and in the Control group 6.74 (1.81), discharge time in the intervention group 14.51 (2.93) and in the control group 2.93 (2.04), Overall satisfaction with nursing care in intervention group 13.85 (2.46) and in the control group 8.46 (2.41), Overall satisfaction with medical procedures in the intervention group 12.81 (2.73) and in the control group 8.58 (3.20) and Overall patient satisfaction in the intervention group 2.27 (1.81) and 41.4 (1.66) in the control group. An independent T-test was used to compare satisfaction and its dimensions in two groups, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study results showed a statistically significant difference in the satisfaction in the intervention and control groups, so it can be concluded that conducting the integrated discharge model is effective in increasing the satisfaction of trauma patients. Therefore, it is recommended to use this educational method to increase patient satisfaction and decrease readmission rates.

How to tackle therapeutic inertia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces morbidity and mortality, but its implementation is often poor in daily clinical practice. Barriers to implementation include clinical and organizational factors that might contribute to clinical inertia, i.e. avoidance/delay of recommended treatment initiation/optimization. The spectrum of strategies that might be applied to foster GDMT implementation is wide, and involves the organizational set-up of heart failure care pathways, tailored drug initiation/optimization strategies increasing the chance of successful implementation, digital tools/telehealth interventions, educational activities and strategies targeting patient/physician awareness, and use of quality registries. This scientific statement by the Heart Failure Association of the ESC provides an overview of the current state of GDMT implementation in HFrEF, clinical and organizational barriers to implementation, and aims at suggesting a comprehensive framework on how to overcome clinical inertia and ultimately improve implementation of GDMT in HFrEF based on up-to-date evidence.

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

The role of multimorbidity in patients with heart failure across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

AIMS

The aim of this analysis was to provide data on the overall comorbidity burden, both cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV, in a large real-world heart failure (HF) population across the ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF from the Swedish HF Registry between 2000 and 2021 were included. Of 91 463 patients (median age 76 years [interquartile range 67-82]), 98% had at least one among the 17 explored comorbidities (94% at least one CV and 85% at least one non-CV comorbidity). All comorbidities, except for coronary artery disease (CAD), were more frequent in HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Patients with multiple comorbidities were older, more likely female, inpatients, with HFpEF, worse New York Heart Association class and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. In a multivariable Cox model, 12 comorbidities were independently associated with a higher risk of death from any cause. The highest risk was associated with dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-1.65), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.34-1.41), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.28-1.35). Obesity was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.84). CAD and valvular heart disease were associated with a higher risk of all-cause and CV mortality, but not non-CV mortality, whereas cancer and musculo-skeletal disease increased the risk of non-CV mortality. A significant interaction with EF was observed for several comorbidities. Occurrence of CV and non-CV outcomes was related to the number of CV and non-CV comorbidities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The burden of both CV and non-CV comorbidities was high in HF regardless of EF, but overall higher in HFpEF. Multimorbidity was associated with a high risk of death with a different burden on CV or non-CV outcomes.

Safety Indicators in Patients Receiving High-intensity Care After Hospital Admission for Acute Heart Failure: The STRONG-HF Trial

BACKGROUND

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies (STRONG-HF) demonstrated the safety and efficacy of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with high-intensity care (HIC) compared with usual care in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF). In the HIC group, the following safety indicators were used to guide up-titration: estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, serum potassium of >5.0 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <95 mmHg, heart rate of <55 bpm, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration of >10% higher than predischarge values.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the impact of protocol-specified safety indicators on achieved dose of GDMT and clinical outcomes. Three hundred thirteen of the 542 patients in the HIC arm (57.7%) met ≥1 safety indicator at any follow-up visit 1-6 weeks after discharge. As compared with those without, patients meeting ≥1 safety indicator had more severe HF symptoms, lower SBP, and higher heart rate at baseline and achieved a lower average percentage of GDMT optimal doses (mean difference vs the HIC arm patients not reaching any safety indicator, -11.0% [95% confidence interval [CI] -13.6 to -8.4%], P < .001). The primary end point of 180-day all-cause death or HF readmission occurred in 15.0% of patients with any safety indicator vs 14.2% of those without (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.46, P = .540). None of each of the safety indicators, considered alone, was significantly associated with the primary end point, but an SBP of <95 mm Hg was associated with a trend toward increased 180-day all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.68, 95% CI 0.94-7.64, P = .065) and estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 with more HF readmissions (adjusted hazard ratio 3.60, 95% CI 1.22-10.60, P = .0203). The occurrence of a safety indicator was associated with a smaller 90-day improvement in the EURO-QoL 5-Dimension visual analog scale (adjusted mean difference -3.32 points, 95% CI -5.97 to -0.66, P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute HF enrolled in STRONG-HF in the HIC arm, the occurrence of any safety indicator was associated with the administration of slightly lower GDMT doses and less improvement in quality of life, but with no significant increase in the primary outcome of 180-day HF readmission or death when appropriately addressed according to the study protocol.

Blood pressure and intensive treatment up-titration after acute heart failure hospitalization: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial

AIMS

A high-intensity care (HIC) strategy with rapid guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) up-titration and close follow-up visits improved outcomes, compared to usual care (UC), in patients recently hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). Hypotension is a major limitation to GDMT implementation. We aimed to assess the impact of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the effects of HIC versus UC and the role of early SBP changes in STRONG-HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1075 patients hospitalized for AHF with SBP ≥100 mmHg were included in STRONG-HF. For the purpose of this post-hoc analysis, patients were stratified by tertiles of baseline SBP (<118, 118-128, and ≥129 mmHg) and, in the HIC arm, by tertiles of changes in SBP from the values measured before discharge to those measured at 1 week after discharge (≥2 mmHg increase, ≤7 mmHg decrease to <2 mmHg increase, and ≥8 mmHg decrease). The primary endpoint was 180-day heart failure rehospitalization or death. The effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint was independent of baseline SBP evaluated as tertiles (pinteraction = 0.77) or as a continuous variable (pinteraction = 0.91). In the HIC arm, patients with increased, stable and decreased SBP at 1 week reached 83.5%, 76.2% and 75.3% of target doses of GDMT at day 90. The risk of the primary endpoint was not significantly different between patients with different SBP changes at 1 week (adjusted p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

In STRONG-HF, the benefits of HIC versus UC were independent of baseline SBP. Rapid GDMT up-titration was performed also in patients with an early SBP drop, resulting in similar 180-day outcome as compared to patients with stable or increased SBP.

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and quality of life in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are one of the cornerstones of heart failure (HF) therapy. While benefits in terms of HF hospitalizations and death are well established, their impact on quality-of-life (QoL) has not been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of SGLT2i treatment on QoL in patients with HF, by analysing data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We identified a total of 23 RCTs that investigated the role of SGLT2i on quality of life in patients with HF, irrespective of their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RCTs that used Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) to assess QoL and had a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. The difference in mean change of the KCCQ-OSS between the SGLT2i group and the standard of care (SOC) group at 3 and 6 months from baseline was considered as the outcome measure.

FINDINGS

Fourteen RCTs (21 737 patients) were included in the analysis. A significant improvement in KCCQ-OSS over time (p < 0.001) was observed in both patients receiving SOC and those receiving SGLT2i in addition. The pooled estimate showed a significant improvement of 1.94 points [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-2.46] in KCCQ-OSS mean change at 3 months and of 2.18 points (95% CI, 1.13-3.24) at 6 months from baseline, with SGLT2i compared to SOC alone, irrespective of LVEF. A greater improvement in KCCQ-OSS was observed among patients with a recent episode of worsening HF compared to those with chronic stable HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HF, irrespective of their LVEF and clinical status, the addition of SGLT2i to SOC demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life as early as at 3-month follow-up.

Guideline-directed medical therapy in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: An analysis from the HELP-HF registry

AIM

Persistent symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and poor tolerance of GDMT are hallmarks of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, real-world data on GDMT use, dose, and prognostic implications are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 699 consecutive patients with HFrEF and at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF enrolled in a multicentre registry. Beta-blockers (BB) were administered to 574 (82%) patients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ACEi/ARB/ARNI) were administered to 381 (55%) patients and 416 (60%) received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Overall, ≥50% of target doses were reached in 41%, 22%, and 56% of the patients on BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively. Hypotension, bradycardia, kidney dysfunction and hyperkalaemia were the main causes of underprescription and/or underdosing, but up to a half of the patients did not receive target doses for unknown causes (51%, 41%, and 55% for BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively). The proportions of patients receiving BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were lower among those fulfilling the 2018 HFA-ESC criteria for advanced HF. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were associated with a lower risk of death or HF hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.84, and HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, real-world, contemporary cohort of patients with severe HFrEF, with at least one marker for advanced HF, prescription and uptitration of GDMT remained limited. A significant proportion of patients were undertreated due to unknown reasons suggesting a potential role of clinical inertia either by the prescribing healthcare professional or by the patient. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI was associated with lower mortality/morbidity.

Clinical and prognostic implications of heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure, but its prognostic role in advanced heart failure is still unsettled. We evaluated the prognostic role of heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure.

METHODS

The multicenter HELP-HF registry enrolled consecutive patients with heart failure and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who were hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (inpatients) or not (outpatients) at the time of enrolment. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among the 1149 patients included [mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% (IQR 25-50%)], 777 (67.6%) were inpatients at the time of enrolment. As compared with outpatients, inpatients had lower LVEF, higher natriuretic peptides and a worse clinical profile. The 1-year rate of the primary endpoint was 50.9% in inpatients versus 36.8% in outpatients [crude hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.07, P < 0.001]. At multivariable analysis, inpatient status was independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.23-1.93, P < 0.001). Among inpatients, the independent predictors of the primary endpoint were older age, lower SBP, heart failure association criteria for advanced heart failure and glomerular filtration rate 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalization for heart failure in patients with at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker is associated with an extremely poor prognosis supporting the need for specific interventions, such as mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

New Challenges in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Managing Worsening Events

Patients with an established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are prone to experience episodes of worsening symptoms and signs despite continued therapy, termed "worsening heart failure" (WHF). Despite guideline-directed medical therapy, worsening of chronic heart failure accounts for almost 50% of all hospital admissions for HF, and patients experiencing WHF carry a substantially higher risk of death and hospitalization than patients with "stable" HF. New drugs are emerging as arrows in the quiver for clinicians to address the residual risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular deaths in patients with WHF. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the emerging definition of WHF in light of the recent clinical consensus released by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the new therapeutic approaches to treat WHF and then move on to their timing and safety concerns (i.e., renal profile).