Calcium channel blocker use and outcomes in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In contrast to beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain. Despite several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies exploring the effects of CCBs on prognosis and exercise capacity in HFpEF patients, the findings have been inconsistent, likely due to limited statistical power and/or variations in study design. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of CCBs in HFpEF patients. The search of electronic databases identified 2 RCTs including 35 patients and 4 cohort studies including 25,078 patients. In cases of significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50 %), data were pooled using a random-effects model; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. In pooled analysis of the cohort studies, use of CCBs was not associated with the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [95 % CI] = 0.913 [0.732, 1.139], P random  = 0.420) or hospitalization for heart failure (1.050 [0.970, 1.137], P fix  = 0.230). Separate analyses for dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine CCBs revealed similar results. In pooled analysis of the RCTs, verapamil increased exercise time (weighted mean difference [95 % CI] = 0.953 [0.109, 1.797] min; P fix  = 0.027) and decreased the congestive heart failure score (2.019 [1.673, 2.365] points; P fix  < 0.001) compared with placebo. In conclusion, in HFpEF patients, verapamil may improve exercise capacity and symptoms but use of CCBs, regardless of subclass, may not be associated with better prognosis. Our meta-analysis is limited by the inclusion of only several studies for each outcome and further research is necessary to confirm our findings.

Effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved ejection fraction (EF) and the mortality and morbidity of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) are high. Patients with HFpEF are often elderly and their primary chronic symptom is severe exercise intolerance. Due to the frequent coexistence of hypertension in HFpEF patients, the use of anti-hypertensive medications is common in their treatment. While many cohort studies and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effectiveness of various anti-hypertensive drugs such as beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in HFpEF, the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) remains uncertain. Despite several RCTs and cohort studies exploring the effects of CCBs on prognosis and exercise capacity in HFpEF patients, the findings have been inconsistent, likely due to limited statistical power and/or variations in study design. Therefore, our aim is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of CCBs in these patients.

METHODS

This meta-analysis will include RCTs and cohort studies on the effect of CCBs in HFpEF patients. Information of studies will be collected from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The primary outcome of interest will be prognosis. The secondary outcome of interest will be exercise capacity.

DISCUSSION

Synthesizing our meta-analytical results with expert consensus could contribute to the formulation of updated clinical guidelines. Our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide directions for future research on the use of CCBs in HFpEF patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY202430097.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Elderly Population: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Considerations

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) refers to a clinical condition in which the signs of heart failure, such as pulmonary congestion, peripheral edema, and increased natriuretic peptide levels, are present despite normal ejection fractions and the absence of other causes (eg, pericardial disease). The ejection fraction cutoff for the definition of HFpEF has varied in the past, but recent society guidelines have settled on a consensus of 50%. HFpEF is particularly common in the elderly population. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the available literature regarding HFpEF in elderly patients in terms of evidence for the age dependence, specific clinical features, and underlying mechanisms. In the clinical arena, we review the epidemiology, discuss distinct clinical phenotypes typically seen in elderly patients, the importance of frailty, the role of biomarkers, and the role of medical therapies (including sodium-glucose cotransport protein 2 inhibitors, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, diuretics, and β-adrenergic receptor blockers). We then go on to discuss the basic mechanisms implicated in HFpEF, including cellular senescence, fibrosis, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, enhanced production of reactive oxygen species, abnormal cellular calcium handling, changes in microRNA signalling, insulin resistance, and sex hormone changes. Finally, we review knowledge gaps and promising areas of future investigation. Improved understanding of the specific clinical manifestations of HFpEF in elderly individuals and of the fundamental mechanisms that contribute to the age-related risk of HFpEF promises to lead to novel diagnostic and treatment approaches that will improve outcomes for this common cardiac disorder in a vulnerable population.

Blood pressure and heart failure: focused on treatment

Heart failure (HF) remains a significant global health burden, and hypertension is known to be the primary contributor to its development. Although aggressive hypertension treatment can prevent heart changes in at-risk patients, determining the optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in cases diagnosed with HF is challenging owing to insufficient evidence. Notably, hypertension is more strongly associated with HF with preserved ejection fraction than with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients with acute hypertensive HF exhibit sudden symptoms of acute HF, especially those manifested with severely high BP; however, no specific vasodilator therapy has proven beneficial for this type of acute HF. Since the majority of medications used to treat HF contribute to lowering BP, and BP remains one of the most important hemodynamic markers, targeted BP management is very concerned in treatment strategies. However, no concrete guidelines exist, prompting a trend towards optimizing therapies to within tolerable ranges, rather than setting explicit BP goals. This review discusses the connection between BP and HF, explores its pathophysiology through clinical studies, and addresses its clinical significance and treatment targets.

Vericiguat in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis of VITALITY-HFpEF and VICTORIA

Vericiguat, the newest soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) drug, is potentially beneficial in treating heart failure (HF). However, most studies have only confirmed the significant impact of sGC in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, the main objective of this meta-analysis was to comparatively analyze the effects of Vericiguat in the entire LVEF range based on previous studies. According to PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases, randomized controlled studies in the full LVEF stage range were screened, and two extensive clinical studies on Vericiguat, namely VICTORIA (LVEF<45%) and VITALITY-HFpEF (LVEF≥45%) were identified for analysis and systematic evaluation. We separately assessed the rates of primary outcomes, cardiovascular death, and serious adverse events in both studies. The results of our research confirmed that although the criteria for the primary outcome were not the same in the two extensive studies, it was evident that there was no difference in the primary outcome between the experimental Vericiguat group and the placebo group in the VITALITY-HFpEF (LVEF≥45%) (P=0.45), whereas the primary outcome of VICTORIA (LVEF<45%) was significantly improved with the administration of Vericiguat showing a significant improvement (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.00), but the effect of Vericiguat on cardiovascular mortality was not significant across the full range of LVEF (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09), and the incidence of total serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two studies (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03). Surprisingly, partial subgroups analysis of serious adverse events found that vericiguat treatment reduced the incidence of all-cause death, Cardiac disorders, Hypotension, and Hypertension in patients with LVEF<45%, with a particular effect on the incidence of Cardiac disorders. Taken together, Vericiguat had a significant benefit in HF patients with LVEF<45%, especially in patients with LVEF<24%; it had a less pronounced effect in HF patients with LVEF ≥45%, but no adverse effects were observed.