A human CD4 transgene rescues CD4-CD8+ cells in beta 2-microglobulin-deficient mice

The CD4 Versus CD8 T Cell Fate Decision: A Multiomics-Informed Perspective

The choice of developing thymocytes to become CD8+ cytotoxic or CD4+ helper T cells has been intensely studied, but many of the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Recent multiomics approaches have provided much higher resolution analysis of gene expression in developing thymocytes than was previously achievable, thereby offering a fresh perspective on this question. Focusing on our recent studies using CITE-seq (cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes) analyses of mouse thymocytes, we present a detailed timeline of RNA and protein expression changes during CD8 versus CD4 T cell differentiation. We also revisit our current understanding of the links between T cell receptor signaling and expression of the lineage-defining transcription factors ThPOK and RUNX3. Finally, we propose a sequential selection model to explain the tight linkage between MHC-I versus MHC-II recognition and T cell lineage choice. This model incorporates key aspects of previously proposed kinetic signaling, instructive, and stochastic/selection models.

The role of ThPOK in control of CD4/CD8 lineage commitment

During alphabeta T cell development, cells diverge into alternate CD4 helper and CD8(+) cytotoxic T cell lineages. The precise correlation between a T cell's CD8 and CD4 choice and its TCR specificity to class I or class II MHC was noted more than 20 years ago, and establishing the underlying mechanism has remained a focus of intense study since then. This review deals with three formerly discrete topics that are gradually becoming interconnected: the role of TCR signaling in lineage commitment, the regulation of expression of the CD4 and CD8 genes, and transcriptional regulation of lineage commitment. It is widely accepted that TCR signaling exerts a decisive influence on lineage choice, although the underlying mechanism remains intensely debated. Current evidence suggests that both duration and intensity of TCR signaling may control lineage choice, as proposed by the kinetic signaling and quantitative instructive models, respectively. Alternate expression of the CD4 and CD8 genes is the most visible manifestation of lineage choice, and much progress has been made in defining the responsible cis elements and transcription factors. Finally, important clues to the molecular basis of lineage commitment have been provided by the recent identification of the transcription factor ThPOK as a key regulator of lineage choice. ThPOK is selectively expressed in class II-restricted cells at the CD4(+)8(lo) stage and is necessary and sufficient for development to the CD4 lineage. Given the central role of ThPOK in lineage commitment, understanding its upstream regulation and downstream gene targets is expected to reveal further important aspects of the molecular machinery underlying lineage commitment.

Targeting CD4 coreceptor expression to postselection thymocytes reveals that CD4/CD8 lineage choice is neither error-prone nor stochastic

The mechanism by which CD4/CD8 lineage choice is coordinated with TCR specificity during positive selection remains an unresolved problem in immunology. The stochastic/selection model proposes that CD4/CD8 lineage choice in TCR-signaled CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes occurs randomly and therefore is highly error-prone. This perspective is strongly supported by "coreceptor rescue" experiments in which transgenic CD4 coreceptors were ectopically expressed on thymocytes throughout their development and caused significant numbers of cells bearing MHC-II-specific TCR to differentiate into mature, CD8 lineage T cells. However, it is not known if forced coreceptor expression actually rescued positively selected thymocytes making an incorrect lineage choice or if it influenced developing thymocytes into making an incorrect lineage choice. We have now reassessed coreceptor rescue and the concept that lineage choice is highly error-prone with a novel CD4 transgene (referred to as E8(I)-CD4) that targets expression of transgenic CD4 coreceptors specifically to thymocytes that have already undergone positive selection and adopted a CD8 lineage fate. Unlike previous CD4 transgenes, the E8(I)-CD4 transgene has no effect on early thymocyte development and cannot itself influence CD4/CD8 lineage choice. We report that the E8(I)-CD4 transgene did in fact induce expression of functional CD4 coreceptor proteins on newly arising CD8 lineage thymocytes precisely at the point in thymic development that transgenic CD4 coreceptors would putatively rescue MHC-II-specific thymocytes that incorrectly adopted the CD8 lineage. However, the E8(I)-CD4 transgene did not reveal any MHC-II-selected thymocytes that adopted the CD8 lineage fate. These results demonstrate that CD4/CD8 lineage choice is neither error-prone nor stochastic.

Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice

Following successful gene rearrangement at alphabeta T-cell receptor (TCR) loci, developing thymocytes express both CD4 and CD8 co-receptors and undergo a life-or-death selection event, which is known as positive selection, to identify cells that express TCRs with potentially useful ligand specificities. Positively selected thymocytes must then differentiate into either CD4(+) helper T cells or CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells, a crucial decision known as CD4/CD8-lineage choice. In this Review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the cellular and molecular events involved in lineage-fate decision and discuss them in the context of the major models of CD4/CD8-lineage choice.

Analyzing expression of perforin, Runx3, and Thpok genes during positive selection reveals activation of CD8-differentiation programs by MHC II-signaled thymocytes

Intrathymic positive selection matches CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation to MHC specificity. However, it is unclear whether MHC signals induce lineage choice or simply select thymocytes of the appropriate lineage. To investigate this issue, we assessed thymocytes undergoing positive selection for expression of the CD8 lineage markers perforin and Runx3. Using both population-based and single-cell RT-PCR analyses, we found large subsets of MHC class II (MHC-II)-signaled thymocytes expressing these genes within the CD4+ 8+ and CD4+ 8(int), but not the CD4+ 8- populations of signaling competent mice. This indicates that MHC-II signals normally fail to impose CD4 differentiation and further implies that the number of mature CD8 single-positive (SP) thymocytes greatly underestimates CD8 lineage choice. We next examined whether MHC-II-restricted CD4+ 8- thymocytes remain competent to initiate CD8 lineage gene expression. In mice in which expression of the tyrosine kinase Zap70 and thereby TCR signaling were impaired selectively in SP thymocytes, MHC-II-signaled CD4+ 8- thymocytes expressed perforin and Runx3 and failed to up-regulate the CD4 marker Thpok. This indicated that impairing TCR signals at the CD4 SP stage switched gene expression patterns from CD4- to CD8-lineage specific. We conclude from these findings that MHC-II-signaled thymocytes remain competent to initiate CD8-specific gene expression even after CD8 down-regulation and that CD4 lineage differentiation is not fixed before the CD4 SP stage.

CD4-CD8 lineage commitment: an inside view

The mechanism of CD4-CD8 lineage commitment, which ensures the correlation between T cell receptor specificity and adoption of the T killer or T helper phenotype, has long been the subject of intense debate. Various approaches are slowly elucidating the underlying molecular pathways. Analysis of the function of T cell receptor signaling (the 'top-down' approach) supports the view that differences in signal strength and/or duration 'instruct' alternative commitment. Analysis of the transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding CD4 and CD8 (the 'bottom-up' approach) has identified critical cis-acting elements and their interacting factors. Finally, identification of the transcription factor Th-POK as a central component of the CD4 lineage-determining pathway has provided a new starting point from which to unravel this intriguing process 'from the inside out'.

Dynamic repositioning of CD4 and CD8 genes during T cell development

Although stable repression of CD4 and CD8 genes is a central feature of T cell lineage commitment, we lack detailed information about the timing and mechanism of this repression. Stable gene repression has been linked to the position of genes within the nucleus. Therefore, information about the nuclear position of CD4 and CD8 genes during T cell development could provide insights into both the mechanism of regulation of CD4 and CD8 genes, and the process of lineage commitment. Here, we report that lineage-specific repression of CD4 and CD8 genes is associated with the repositioning of alleles close to heterochromatin. We also provide evidence that the relocalization of CD4 and CD8 genes to heterochromatin can occur as an early response to positive selection signals. We discuss our results in terms of our current knowledge of CD4 and CD8 gene regulation and CD4 versus CD8 lineage commitment.

Duration of TCR signaling controls CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation in vivo

The duration of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling is thought to be important for thymocyte differentiation into the CD4 or CD8 lineage. However, the in vivo relevance of this hypothesis is unclear. Here we divided T cell positive selection into genetically separable developmental steps by confining TCR signal transduction to discrete thymocyte developmental windows. TCR signals confined to the double-positive thymocyte stage promoted CD8, but not CD4, lineage differentiation. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted thymocytes were, instead, redirected into the CD8 lineage. These findings support the hypothesis that distinct kinetics of MHC class I- and MHC class II-induced TCR signals direct intrathymic developmental decisions.

On the brink of becoming a T cell

Recent studies provide fresh insight into the mechanisms by which precursor cells are committed to and develop within the T-lymphocyte lineage. Precursor/product studies have identified developmental stages between that of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell and thymocytes committed to the T lineage. Specific ligands and signaling pathways interacting with the Notch-1 receptor and its ability to influence commitment within the lymphoid lineage have been described. Although the structural features or putative ligands endowing the pre-TCR with constitutive signaling capacity remain elusive, numerous distal mediators of pre-TCR signaling have been identified. It remains for the future to determine what roles they may have in survival, proliferation, lineage commitment and allelic exclusion of TCR genes. Receptor editing and lineage commitment of alphabeta T cells still represent controversial topics that need further study.

Deletion of the CD4 silencer element supports a stochastic mechanism of thymocyte lineage commitment

The mechanism of T cell lineage commitment remains controversial; to examine it we deleted the CD4-silencer element in the germ line of a mouse using a combination of gene targeting and Cre/LoxP-mediated recombination. We found that these mice were unable to extinguish CD4 expression either in immature thymocytes or mature CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), which resulted in the development of major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted double-positive CTLs in the periphery. This finding strongly supports a stochastic over an instructive mechanism of coreceptor down-regulation.

The Role of CD8α′ in the CD4 Versus CD8 Lineage Choice

During thymic development the recognition of MHC proteins by developing thymocytes influences their lineage commitment, such that recognition of class I MHC leads to CD8 T cell development, whereas recognition of class II MHC leads to CD4 T cell development. The coreceptors CD8 and CD4 may contribute to these different outcomes through interactions with class I and class II MHC, respectively, and through interactions with the tyrosine kinase p56lck (Lck) via their cytoplasmic domains. In this paper we provide evidence that an alternatively spliced form of CD8 that cannot interact with Lck (CD8α′) can influence the CD4 vs CD8 lineage decision. Constitutive expression of a CD8 minigene transgene that encodes both CD8α and CD8α′ restores CD8 T cell development in CD8α mutant mice, but fails to permit the development of mismatched CD4 T cells bearing class I-specific TCRs. These results indicate that CD8α′ favors the development of CD8-lineage T cells, perhaps by reducing Lck activity upon class I MHC recognition in the thymus.

The regulation of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor gene expression during T cell development

The two major subsets of T lymphocytes in the peripheral immune system, the helper and cytotoxic T cells, are defined by their expression of either the CD4 or the CD8 glycoproteins, respectively. Expression of these molecules, which serve as coreceptors by interacting specifically with either MHC class II or class I molecules, also defines discrete stages of T cell development within the thymus. Thus, CD4+ and CD8+ single-positive (SP) thymocytes arise from common progenitor double positive (DP) cells that express both CD4 and CD8, during a process known as positive selection. The molecular mechanisms underlying the developmental choice toward the helper or cytotoxic lineage remain poorly understood. Because regulation of coreceptor gene expression appears to be coupled to the phenotypic choice of the differentiating T cell, it is likely that shared signaling pathways direct CD4 and CD8 transcription and the development of an uncommited DP thymocyte toward either the helper or cytotoxic lineage. Therefore, an understanding of how CD4 and CD8 expression is regulated will not only provide insights into transcriptional control mechanisms in T cells, but may also result in the identification of molecular factors that are involved in lineage choices during T cell development. In this review, we summarize recent progress that has been made toward an understanding of how CD4 and CD8 gene expression is regulated.

Visualization of CD4/CD8 T cell commitment

A system to innocuously visualize T cell lineage commitment is described. Using a "knock-in" approach, we have generated mice expressing a beta-galactosidase reporter in place of CD4; expression of beta-galactosidase in these animals appears to be an accurate and early indicator of CD4 gene transcription. We have exploited this knock-in line to trace CD4/CD8 lineage commitment in the thymus, avoiding important pitfalls of past experimental approaches. Our results argue in favor of a selective model of thymocyte commitment, demonstrating a fundamentally symmetrical process: engagement of either class of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule by a differentiating CD4(+)CD8(+) cell can give rise to T cell antigen receptor (TCR)hi thymocytes of either lineage. Key findings include (a) direct demonstration of a substantial number of CD4-committed, receptor/coreceptor-mismatched cells in MHC class II- deficient mice, a critical prediction of the selective model; (b) highly efficient rescue of such "mismatched" intermediates by forced expression of CD8 in a TCR transgenic line, and an explanation of why previous experiments of this nature were less successful-a major past criticism of the selective model; (c) direct demonstration of an analogous, though smaller, population of CD8-committed mismatched intermediates in class I-deficient animals. Finally, we found no evidence of a CD4 default pathway.

CD4/CD8 lineage commitment: matching fate with competence

The outcome of positive selection of T lymphocytes is that there is a close match between the lineage adopted by a particular cell (CD4+ or CD8+) and the specificity of the T-cell receptor for the class of Major Histocompatibility Complex molecule recognized. How this match is obtained has been a matter of debate. We review the evidence, from recent and older experiments, that indicates that the process follows a selective logic, rather than an instructive one.

T cell repertoire: genomic or somatic bias toward recognition of major histocompatibility complex molecules?

The prevailing concept about a major influence of thymic positive selection on shaping the T cell repertoire during ontogeny is confronted with an old idea emphasizing a dominant role for genetic (evolutionary) factors in molding the recognition potential of mature T cells. Our recent results are not readily interpreted without introducing a new version of the old concept, according to which complementarity to the major histocompatibility complex peptide-binding site is a major evolutionary selective pressure on T cell antigen receptor variable genes, with alloreactivity being a reflection of this fact.

Signals through CD8 or CD4 can induce commitment to the CD4 lineage in the thymus

Differentiation of thymocytes into mature single-positive T cells is an ordered process involving sequential interactions between T cell receptor (TCR), co-receptors (CD4 or CD8) and their appropriate major histocompatibility complex-encoded ligands. Precisely how these receptor/co-receptor engagements determine lineage commitment is still controversial, but recently it has been suggested that quantitative differences in the signal transmitted by co-ligation of CD4 versus CD8 with TCR might provide the discriminating signal. We examine this hypothesis, using bispecific F(ab')2 antibodies to mimic TCR/ co-receptor engagement during thymocyte differentiation. These bispecific antibodies lack Fc and can engage surface molecules without extensive cross-linking or targeting to Fc receptor-bearing cells. We show that TCR/CD3 co-ligation with CD4 induces efficient differentiation of mature CD4 lineage cells, irrespective of their TCR specificity. Interestingly, TCR/CD3 co-ligation with CD8 also induces maturation of CD4 T cells, although less efficiently, but not of CD8 T cells. Thus, although the signals delivered by co-ligation of TCR and CD8 appear weaker than from co-ligation of TCR and CD4, the outcome from either engagement is the same. These data suggest that differences in signal intensity alone do not determine lineage commitment in the thymus, but that distinct signals are required for CD4 and CD8 single-positive cell differentiation.

Lineage commitment in the thymus: only the most differentiated (TCRhibcl-2hi) subset of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes has selectively terminated CD4 or CD8 synthesis

Lineage commitment is a developmental process by which individual CD4+CD8+ (double positive, DP) thymocytes make a decision to differentiate into either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. However, the molecular event(s) that defines lineage commitment is controversial. We have previously proposed that lineage commitment in DP thymocytes can be molecularly defined as the selective termination of CD4 or CD8 coreceptor synthesis. The present study supports such a molecular definition by showing that termination of either CD4 or CD8 synthesis is a highly regulated event that is only evident within the most differentiated DP subset (CD5hiCD69hiTCRhibcl-2hi). In fact, essentially all cells within this DP subset actively synthesize only one coreceptor molecule. In addition, the present results identify three distinct sub-populations of DP thymocytes that define the developmental progression of the lineage commitment process and demonstrate that lineage commitment is coincident with upregulation of TCR and bcl-2. Thus, this study supports a molecular definition of lineage commitment and uniquely identifies TCRhibcl-2hi DP thymocytes as cells that are already committed to either the CD4 or CD8 T cell lineage.

Unexpectedly complex regulation of CD4/CD8 coreceptor expression supports a revised model for CD4+CD8+ thymocyte differentiation

CD4+ CD8+ TCRlo thymocytes are the precursors of CD4+ and CD8+ mature T cells, whose receptors show specific recognition of peptide-MHC class II and MHC class I complexes, respectively. How T cells emerge from the intrathymic differentiation process with selective expression of either CD8 molecule or CD4 molecule coordinated with the MHC class specificity of the TCR has been the subject of intense examination. Many previous studies of this question have been based on the assumption that extinction of CD4 or CD8 expression by the precursor thymocytes was a steady, uninterrupted process. Here we show that this is an incorrect assumption, with CD4 and CD8 expression undergoing an unexpectedly complex series of expression changes involving down-modulation, kinetically asymmetric up-regulation, and then selective loss. Based on these data, we propose a model for the differentiation pathway of alphabeta TCR thymocytes that explains previous, apparently contradictory findings and establishes useful parameters for future studies at the cellular and gene level.

MHC class II-specific T cells can develop in the CD8 lineage when CD4 is absent

The generation of mature CD4 T cells from CD4+CD8+ precursor thymocytes usually requires corecognition of class II MHC by a TCR and CD4, while the production of mature CD8 T cells requires corecognition of class I MHC by a TCR and CD8. To assess the role of the CD4 coreceptor in development and lineage commitment, we generated CD4-deficient mice expressing a transgenic class II-specific TCR. Surprisingly, in the absence of CD4 a large number of T cells mature, but these cells appear in the CD8 lineage. Thus, when CD4 is present, the majority of immature T cells with this class II-specific TCR choose the CD4 lineage but develop in the CD8 pathway when CD4 is absent. The results indicate that even for TCRs that are not dependent on coreceptor for MHC recognition, the coreceptor can influence the lineage choice. These findings are considered in terms of a quantitative signaling model for CD4/CD8 lineage commitment.

The cytoplasmic domain of CD4 promotes the development of CD4 lineage T cells

Thymocytes must bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins on thymic epithelial cells in order to mature into either CD8+ cytotoxic T cells or CD4+ helper T cells. Thymic precursors express both CD8 and CD4, and it has been suggested that the intracellular signals generated by CD8 or CD4 binding to class I or II MHC, respectively, might influence the fate of uncommitted cells. Here we test the notion that intracellular signaling by CD4 directs the development of thymocytes to a CD4 lineage. A hybrid protein consisting of the CD8 extracellular and transmembrane domains and the cytoplasmic domain of CD4 (CD884) should bind class I MHC but deliver a CD4 intracellular signal. We find that expression of a hybrid CD884 protein in thymocytes of transgenic mice leads to the development of large numbers of class I MHC-specific, CD4 lineage T cells. We discuss these results in terms of current models for CD4 and CD8 lineage commitment.

The regulation and function of the CD4 coreceptor during T lymphocyte development

The data reviewed in this chapter suggest that the primary developmental function of the CD4 and CD8 coreceptors is to improve the efficacy by which a thymocyte recognizes peptide/MHC. During positive selection, DP thymocytes down-regulate expression of either CD4 or CD8 in response to signals that originate from the TCR/coreceptor complex. Experiments with transgenic and MHC-null mice have shown that coreceptor down-regulation and lineage commitment can occur stochastically in a manner that is independent of TCR specificity for MHC. Nevertheless, the positive selection of a given thymocyte is contingent on sustained expression of the coreceptor that is appropriate for the MHC specificity of its TCR. In most cases, loss of the required coreceptor blocks developmental progression and results in thymocyte apoptosis. CD4 expression is controlled by both positive and negative regulatory sequences embedded in the CD4 gene and it is likely that similar sequences regulate the CD8 gene. The down-regulation of coreceptor expression is coupled to a functional commitment which ensures that mature CD4+ T cells have a helper phenotype and CD8+ T cells have a cytotoxic phenotype. The molecular basis for this coupling and the identity of the switching mechanism which governs coreceptor regulation remain to be determined.

Preferential positive selection of T lymphocytes which express two different TCR alpha chains, an endogenous and a transgenic

A hallmark of positive selection in T-cell receptor (TCR)-transgenic mice is a strong skewing towards the CD4+ or the CD8+ subset, depending on the class II or I restriction of the TCR, respectively. However, previous experiments in TCR transgenic mice specific for an Ig light chain (lambda 2(315)/I-Ed class II molecule did not fit into this scheme because the authors observed an anomalous skewing towards CD8. In this paper the authors show that endogenous TCR alpha chains are expressed on > 90% of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in this particular transgenic strain, even on a selecting H-2d haplotype. Endogenous TCR alpha chains are first detected when double-positive thymocytes down-regulate either CD4 or CD8. Endogenous V alpha seems to influence generation of T-cell subsets because CD4+ and CD8+ cells express different frequencies of endogenous V alpha 2 and V alpha 8. In the absence of endogenous TCR alpha chains in recombination-deficient TCR-transgenic severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice, a strong skewing towards CD4+ T cells is seen, but such mice are severely T-cell deficient. As an explanation for these results, the authors suggest that the transgenic TCR has a too low affinity for efficient positive selection, therefore, TCR alpha gene rearrangements proceed. Endogenous TCR alpha paired with transgenic TCR beta could bind to class I or class II molecules, enhance positive selection and thereby production of CD4+ or CD8+ cells. Most of the 'mismatched' CD8+ cells are lambda 2(315)-specific and I-Ed class II restricted, and may function as idiotype-specific suppressors of B cells. These results may help explain the origin of dual TCR alpha T cells. Furthermore, the authors suggest that T cells 'mismatched' for co-receptor/TCR MHC-specificity may be enriched among dual TCR alpha T cells.

Positive selection of T cells: rescue from programmed cell death and differentiation require continual engagement of the T cell receptor

Positive selection of T cells is a complex developmental process generating long-lived, functionally mature CD4+CD8- and CD4-CD8+ cells from short-lived, immature CD4+CD8+ precursors. The process is initiated in the thymus by interaction of the alpha beta TCR with molecules encoded by the MHC, occurs without cell division, and involves rescue from programmed cell death (PCD), as well as induction of differentiation and maturation of selected precursors. It is unclear whether development of small, positively selected CD4+CD8+ thymocytes (characterized by up-regulated levels of TCR and CD69 molecules) depends on further interactions with MHC molecules and, if so, whether such interactions are required for survival, for maturation, or for both. The involvement of the TCR and/or CD4/CD8 coreceptors in transmitting additional signals is also unknown. We have examined these questions by analyzing survival and differentiation of early (CD4+CD8+TCRhi) and later (CD4-CD8+TCRhi) postselection stages of thymocytes from normal and bcl-2 transgenic mice expressing transgenic, class I MHC-restricted TCR, upon intrathymic transfer into recipients that lacked ligands either for both the TCR and CD8 coreceptor, or for the TCR only. The results provide direct evidence that induction of differentiation of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes by recognition of MHC molecules does not rescue them from PCD and is insufficient to activate the entire maturation program. Both processes require continual engagement of the TCR by positively selecting MHC molecules that, at least in the case of class I MHC-restricted CD4-CD8+ T cells, cannot be substituted by the engagement of coreceptor alone.

Stochastic coreceptor shut-off is restricted to the CD4 lineage maturation pathway

Kinetics of mature T cell generation in the thymus of normal or major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I- or II-deficient mice were studied by the bromodeoxyuridine pulse labeling method. As previously described, the early activation and final maturation phases were found to be synchronous for the two T cell lineages, but CD4+8- cells were generated faster than CD4-8+ cells in MHC class I- and II-deficient mice, respectively. CD8 downregulation started on day 2 after cell proliferation even in the absence of MHC class II expression. CD8 downregulation thus appears to be stochastic at its beginning. By contrast, CD4 shut-off was found totally instructive, as the generation of CD4lo8+ cells with a high TCR density was not observed in class I-deficient mice. The analysis of the V beta 14 TCR frequencies in CD4/8 subsets in normal and MHC-deficient mice confirmed that CD4 and CD8 generation pathways are not symmetrical. These findings show that commitment towards the CD4+8- or CD4-8+ phenotype is controlled at the CD8lo step for the former and at the CD4+8+ double-positive stage for the latter.

Intermediate steps in positive selection: differentiation of CD4+8int TCRint thymocytes into CD4-8+TCRhi thymocytes

The differentiation potential of putative intermediates between CD4+8+ thymocytes and mature T cells has been examined. Such intermediate populations were sorted, in parallel with CD4+8+ thymocytes, from three types of C57BL/6 mice: major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-deficient mice, mice transgenic for an alpha/beta T cell receptor (TCR) restricted by class I MHC and normal mice. The sorted populations were then transferred into the thymus of nonirradiated C57BL/Ka mice differing in Thy 1 allotype, and the progeny of the transferred cells were analyzed 2 d later. Surprisingly, with all three types of donor mice, a major proportion of the CD4+8intTCRint-derived progeny were found to be CD4-8+TCRhi cells, thus delineating a new alternative pathway for development of the CD8 lineage. In contrast, the transfer of CD4int8+TCRint thymocytes produced CD4-8+TCRhi cells but no significant proportion of CD4+8-TCRhi cells, suggesting that there is no equivalent alternative pathway for the CD4 lineage. The results negate some of the evidence for a stochastic/selective model of lineage commitment, and point to an asymmetry in the steps leading to CD4-8+ versus CD4+8- T cells.

Asymmetric signaling requirements for thymocyte commitment to the CD4+ versus CD8+ T cell lineages: a new perspective on thymic commitment and selection

Differentiation of immature CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes into mature CD4+ CD8- and CD4-CD8+ T cells requires that synthesis of one or the other coreceptor molecule be terminated, a process referred to as lineage commitment. The present study has utilized a novel coreceptor reexpression assay to identify lineage commitment in immature thymocytes and has found that the MHC recognition requirements for CD4 commitment and CD8 commitment fundamentally differ from one another. Remarkably, we found that thymocyte commitment to the CD8+ lineage requires MHC class I-dependent instructional signals, whereas thymocyte commitment to the CD4+ lineage is MHC independent and may occur by default. In addition, an unanticipated relationship between lineage commitment and surface phenotype has been identified. These results are incompatible with current concepts and require a new perspective on lineage commitment and positive selection, which we refer to as asymmetric commitment.

Intrathymic T cell receptor (TcR) targeting in mice lacking CD4 or major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II: rescue of CD4 T cell lineage without co-engagement of TcR/CD4 by MHC class II

A critical step during intrathymic T cell development, termed positive selection, is associated with rescue of short-lived, immature thymocytes from programmed cell death, T cell lineage commitment, and induction of lineage-specific differentiation programs. T cell receptor (TcR)-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) interactions during positive selection can be closely mimicked by targeting TcR on immature thymocytes to cortical epithelial cells in situ via hybrid antibodies. Here, we show that antibody-mediated TcR signaling in mice deficient for CD4 or MHC class II expression induces polyclonal differentiation of the CD4 T cell lineage. Following a single TcR signal pulse in situ, a temporal sequence of phenotype changes can be discerned: CD69 up-regulation (< 1 day), CD8 down-regulation, TcR up-regulation (1-1.5 days) and down-regulation of the heat-stable antigen (1.5-2 days). Differentiation of phenotypically and functionally mature CD4 T cells in situ is attained within 3 days. Rescue of CD4 lineage T cells in the absence of TcR/CD4 co-engagement by MHC class II in this experimental system supports the stochastic/selective model of T cell lineage commitment.