Dalili A, Hoorfar M. Sheath-assisted versus sheathless dielectrophoretic particle separation.
Electrophoresis 2021;
42:1570-1577. [PMID:
34196426 DOI:
10.1002/elps.202100029]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Lab-on-chip devices are widely being used for binary and ternary cell/particle separation applications. Among the lab-on-chip methods, dielectrophoresis (DEP) is a cost-effective and label-free method, with great capabilities for size-based separation of cells and particles, which is mostly performed in sheath-assisted forms. However, the elimination of the sheath flows offers advantages such as ease of operation and higher sample throughput. In this work, we present a comparison of sheath-assisted and sheathless DEP separation of three sizes of microparticles using tilted electrodes. The sheath-assisted design was capable of separating the 5, 10, and 15 μm particles with a separation efficiency as high as 98.0% for 15 μm particles. By adding a DEP focusing region, a sheathless DEP separator was proposed, which offered higher throughputs (up to 10 times) at the cost of lowering the separation efficiency (a reduction up to 10.3% for 15 μm) compared to the sheath-assisted design. To enhance the separation efficiency, a combination of the DEP focusing accompanied by weak sheath flows from both sides was proposed. This design achieved the highest sample separation yield in the outlets (as high as 98.7% for 15 μm) with a sample throughput of more than 4.2 μL/min. This study provides insights into the choice of an appropriate platform for any application in which the yield, purity, throughput, and portability must be considered.
Collapse