Genotoxicity of two arsenic compounds in germ cells and somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster

Arsenic and mercury exposure in different insect trophic guilds from mercury mining areas in Mexico

The exposure to arsenic and mercury in various insect trophic guilds from two mercury mining sites in Mexico was assessed. The two study sites were La Laja (LL) and La Soledad (LS) mines. Additionally, a reference site (LSR) was evaluated for LS. The terrestrial ecosystem was studied at LL, whereas both the terrestrial ecosystem and a stream called El Cedral (EC) were assessed at LS. The study sites are situated in the Biosphere Reserve Sierra Gorda (BRSG). Mercury vapor concentrations were measured with a portable analyzer, and concentrations of arsenic and mercury in environmental and biological samples were determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Both pollutants were detected in all terrestrial ecosystem components (soil, air, leaves, flowers, and insects) from the two mines. The insect trophic guilds exposed included pollinivores, rhizophages, predators, coprophages, and necrophages. In LS, insects accumulated arsenic at levels 29 to 80 times higher than those found in specimens from LSR, and 10 to 46 times higher than those from LL. Similarly, mercury exposure in LS was 13 to 62 times higher than LSR, and 15 to 54 times higher than in LL. The analysis of insect exposure routes indicated potential exposure through air, soil, leaves, flowers, animal prey, carrion, and excrement. Water and sediment from EC exhibited high levels of arsenic and mercury compared to reference values, and predatory aquatic insects were exposed to both pollutants. In conclusion, insects from mercury mining sites in the BRSG are at risk.

Models of germ cell development and their application for toxicity studies

Germ cells are unique in their ability to transfer genetic information and traits from generation to generation. As such, the proper development of germ cells and the integrity of their genome are paramount to the health of organisms and the survival of species. Germ cells are also exquisitely sensitive to environmental influences although the testing of germ cell toxicity, especially in females, has proven particularly challenging. In this review, we first describe the remarkable odyssey of germ cells in mammals, with an emphasis on the female germline, from their initial specification early during embryogenesis to the generation of mature gametes in adults. We also describe the current methods used in germ cell toxicity testing and their limitations in examining the complex features of mammalian germ cell development. To bypass these challenges, we propose the use of alternative model systems such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and in vitro germ cell methods that have distinct advantages over traditional toxicity models. We discuss the benefits and limitations of each approach, their application to germ cell toxicity studies, and the need for computational approaches to maximize the usefulness of these models. Together, the inclusion of these alternative germ cell toxicity models will be invaluable for the examination of stages not easily accessible in mammals as well as the large scale, high-throughput investigation of germ cell toxicity.

A review on exposure and effects of arsenic in passerine birds

Arsenic (As) is a metalloid of high concern because of its toxic effects for plants and animals. However, it is hard to find information on this metalloid in passerines. This review presents a comprehensive overview of As exposure and effects in birds, and more particularly in passerines, as a result of an extensive search of the literature available. Internal tissues are the most frequently analyzed matrices for As determination in passerines (37.5% of the reviewed studies used internal tissues), followed by feathers and eggs (32.5% each), feces (27.5%), and finally blood (15%). A clear tendency is found in recent years to the use of non-destructive samples. Most studies on As concentrations in passerines have been done in great tit (Parus major; 50%), followed by pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca; 22.5%). Some factors such as diet and migratory status are crucial on the interspecific differences in As exposure. More studies are needed to elucidate if intraspecific factors like age or gender affect As concentrations in different tissues. The literature review shows that studies on As concentrations in passerines have been done mainly in the United States (30%), followed by Belgium (22.5%), and Finland (20%), making evident the scarce or even lack of information in some countries, so we recommend further research in order to overcome the data gap, particularly in the southern hemisphere. Studies on humans, laboratory animals and birds have found a wide range of effects on different organ systems when they are exposed to different forms of As. This review shows that few field studies on As exposure and effects in passerines have been done, and all of them are correlative so far. Arsenic manipulation experiments on passerines are recommended to explore the adverse effects of As in free-living populations at similar levels to those occurring in the environment.

CAPSULE

This review summarizes the most interesting published studies on As exposure and effects in passerines.

Genotoxic effects in C57Bl/6J mice chronically exposed to arsenate in drinking water and modulation of the effects by low-selenium diet

In C57Bl/6J mice chronically exposed to arsenate in drinking water at 50, 200, or 500 microg As/L, genotoxic effects in bone-marrow cells using micronucleus test and in peripheral blood leukocytes using the comet assay were determined after 3, 6 or 12 mo. To assess the modulating role of selenium in development of the effects, the animals were fed a specially prepared low-selenium diet and were supplemented with sodium selenite (200 microg Se/L) in drinking water (supplemented groups) or were without Se supplementation (nonsupplemented groups). Measurements of glutathione peroxidase activity in erythrocytes and plasma as well as selenium concentration in plasma were performed after 3, 6, and 12 mo and showed a marked decrease in values in animals in non-Se supplemented compared to Se-supplemented groups. After 3 mo of arsenic exposure in the Se-supplemented animals the level of DNA fragmentation (without Endo III and Fpg enzymes) did not differ from the control; however, increased oxidative damage of purine and pyrimidine bases was observed. In groups not supplemented with Se, an increase of DNA fragmentation was observed; however, the levels of oxidative DNA damage in these groups did not differ from the control. None of the positive effects observed in the comet assay after 3 mo was related to arsenate concentration. The levels of DNA damage after 6 and 12 mo of exposure to arsenic as well as the frequency of micronuclei after 3, 6, and 12 mo did not differ significantly between exposed and control animals, irrespective of Se supplementation status.

Metabolism of arsenic in Drosophila melanogaster and the genotoxicity of dimethylarsinic acid in the Drosophila wing spot test

Inorganic arsenic is nongenotoxic in the Drosophila melanogaster wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART). Recent evidence in mammalian systems indicates that methylated metabolites of arsenic are more genotoxic than inorganic arsenic. Thus, we hypothesized that inorganic arsenic is nongenotoxic in Drosophila because they are unable to biotransform arsenic to methylated forms. In the present study, we fed trivalent and pentavalent inorganic arsenic to Drosophila larvae and adults and measured the production of methylated derivatives. No biomethylated arsenic species were found in the organisms or in the growth medium, which suggests that Drosophila are unable to biomethylate inorganic arsenic. Exposure of Drosophila to the methylated arsenic derivative dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)) resulted in incorporation of this organoarsenic compound without demethylation. In addition, we used the SMART wing spot assay, which measures loss of heterozygosity (LOH) resulting from gene mutation, chromosomal rearrangement, chromosome breakage, and chromosome loss, to evaluate the genotoxicity of DMA. DMA by itself induced significant increases in the frequency of total spots, small spots, and large single spots. These results are consistent with the important role of arsenic biomethylation as a determinant of the genotoxicity of arsenic compounds. The absence of biomethylation in Drosophila could explain the lack of genotoxicity for inorganic arsenic and the genotoxicity of methylated arsenic species in the SMART wing spot assay.

Evaluation of genotoxicity of captan, maneb and zineb in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster: role of nitrosation

The wing spot test in Drosophila melanogaster is a suitable system for the analysis of genotoxic activity of compounds that need metabolic transformation to render them active. We have analysed the genotoxicity of three fungicides for which it was reported that the metabolic processes taking place in vivo may determine their activity. The compounds analysed are captan, maneb, zineb and ethylenethiourea (ETU) (a metabolic derivative of ethylenebisdithiocarbamates like maneb and zineb). We have also evaluated the ability of ETU to form genotoxic derivatives in vivo analysing this compound in combined treatments with sodium nitrite. Both standard and high bioactivation NORR strains have been used. Captan, usually considered a mutagen in vitro but a non-mutagen in vivo, gave negative results in the wing spot test with both crosses. Positive results were obtained for maneb in the standard cross and for ETU in both the standard and the high bioactivation cross. The genotoxicities of maneb and ETU were higher when treatments were made on media in which nitrosation is favoured. A low absorption of the fungicide and an inefficient availability of the compound in the target may explain negative results obtained with zineb in both crosses. The results obtained in this study with the wing spot test demonstrate once again the suitability of this in vivo assay, in which absorption, distribution and metabolism processes take place, for the evaluation of genotoxicity of compounds to which humans are exposed.

Influence of sodium arsenite on the genotoxicity of potassium dichromate and ethyl methanesulfonate: studies with the wing spot test in Drosophila

The wing spot test in Drosophila melanogaster was used to investigate the genotoxicity of arsenic and its effects on the action of two clearly genotoxic agents: potassium dichromate (PDC) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). This assay is based on the principle that the loss of heterozygosity of the suitable recessive markers multiple wing hairs (mwh) and flare-3 (flr(3)) can lead to the formation of mutant clones of larval cells, which are then expressed as spots on the wings of adult flies. These spots can be attributed to different genotoxic events: either mitotic recombination or mutation (deletion, point mutation, and specific types of translocation). Pretreatments and chronic cotreatments were comparatively used for combined treatments. From the results obtained it is evident that sodium arsenite (SA) does not increase the frequency of any of the three categories of spots recorded (small, large, and twin spots) at the concentrations tested. The effects of SA in combination with PDC, in both cotreatments and pretreatments, indicate that SA almost suppressed the clones induced by PDC. Nevertheless, no effects of arsenic were observed with respect to the pre- and cotreatments with EMS. Thus, SA does not modify the frequencies of mutant clones induced by EMS.

Genetic toxicology of a paradoxical human carcinogen, arsenic: a review

Arsenic is widely distributed in nature in air, water and soil in the form of either metalloids or chemical compounds. It is used commercially, as pesticide, wood preservative, in the manufacture of glass, paper and semiconductors. Epidemiological and clinical studies indicate that arsenic is a paradoxical human carcinogen that does not easily induce cancer in animal models. It is one of the toxic compounds known in the environment. Intermittent incidents of arsenic contamination in ground water have been reported from several parts of the world. Arsenic containing drinking water has been associated with a variety of skin and internal organ cancers. The wide human exposure to this compound through drinking water throughout the world causes great concern for human health. In the present review, we have attempted to evaluate and update the mutagenic and genotoxic effects of arsenic and its compounds based on available literature.

Arsenic and antimony: comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology

A chemico-toxicological similarity between arsenic and antimony exists and their toxicology is often seen. Indeed, both elements possess several common properties, e.g. they are clastogenic but not mutagenic in the trivalent state and they have a carcinogenic potential: trivalent arsenicals are known to be human carcinogens and antimony(III) oxide (by inhalation) has been shown to cause lung cancer in female rats. For years, arsenic has been known to be environmentally toxic. Elevated human exposure to this element, mostly caused by the intake of contaminated tap water, is associated with increased incidences of cancer at various sites. It is still not clear how arsenic compounds exert their genotoxic effect. It may be connected with an inhibition of DNA repair or the induction of oxidative stress. Little work has been done on the toxicology of antimony as it is less widely present in the environment. There is evidence that in mammals antimony, unlike arsenic, is not detoxified via methylation but it still remains unclear what mechanism is responsible for antimony's genotoxicity. In general, there is little information known about this element to accurately determine its impact on human health. Thus, the aim of this paper is to review current knowledge for future risk assessment and further scientific work.

Isolation of three contiguous genes, ACR1, ACR2 and ACR3, involved in resistance to arsenic compounds in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A 4.2 kb region from Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XVI was isolated as a yeast fragment conferring resistance to 7 mM-sodium arsenite (NaAsO2), when put on a multicopy plasmid. Homology searches revealed a cluster of three new open reading frames named ACR1, ACR2 and ACR3. The hypothetical product of the ACR1 gene is similar to the transcriptional regulatory proteins, encoded by YAP1, and YAP2 genes from S. cerevisiae. Disruption of the ACR1 gene conduces to an arsenite and arsenate hypersensitivity phenotype. The ACR2 gene is indispensable for arsenate but not for arsenite resistance. The hypothetical product of the ACR3 gene shows high similarity to the hypothetical membrane protein encoded by Bacillus subtilis ORF1 of the skin element and weak similarity to the ArsB membrane protein of the Staphylococcus aureus arsenical-resistance operon. Overexpression of the ACR3 gene confers an arsenite- but not an arsenate-resistance phenotype. The presence of ACR3 together with ACR2 on a multicopy plasmid expands the resistance phenotype into arsenate. These findings suggest that all three novel genes: ACR1, ACR2 and ACR3 are involved in the arsenical-resistance phenomenon in S. cerevisiae.

Carcinogens induce reversion of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation

Deletions and other genome rearrangements are associated with carcinogenesis and inheritable diseases. The pink-eyed unstable (pun) mutation in the mouse is caused by duplication of a 70-kb internal fragment of the p gene. Spontaneous reversion events in homozygous pun/pun mice occur through deletion of a duplicated sequence. Reversion events in premelanocytes in the mouse embryo detected as black spots on the gray fur of the offspring were inducible by the carcinogen x-rays, ethyl methanesulfonate, methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl nitrosourea, benzo[a]pyrene, trichloroethylene, benzene, and sodium arsenate. The latter three carcinogens are not detectable with several in vitro or in vivo mutagenesis assays. We studied the molecular mechanism of the carcinogen-induced reversion events by cDNA analysis using reverse transcriptase-PCR method and identified the induced reversion events as deletions. DNA deletion assays may be sensitive indicators for carcinogen exposure.

Low mutagenic effects of mitomycin C in undifferentiated embryonic P19 cells are correlated with efficient cell cycle control

Pluripotent undifferentiated embryonic carcinoma cells of line P19 and their differentiated progeny, epithelioid ectoderm-like EPI-7 cells, showed different responses to mitomycin C (MMC) with respect to induction of micronuclei, mutations at the HPRT-locus and cell cycle control. Cytotoxic effects of MMC after a 5-h treatment were lower in undifferentiated P19 cells than in differentiated EPI-7 cells with IC50 values of 1.3 and 0.25 microM for P19 and EPI-7 cells, respectively. MMC did not induce 6-thioguanine-resistant mutants in P19 cells but significantly increased the mutation frequency in EPI-7 cells with concentrations of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 microM MMC. Micronuclei determined by flow-cytometry were induced by MMC in both cell lines at equitoxic concentrations of 4.5 (P19) and 0.75 (EPI-7) microM, reducing the viability in both cell lines to 10%. Whereas the induction of micronuclei in P19 cells was maximal 28 h after treatment and declined thereafter, micronucleus induction peaked 48 h post treatment in EPI-7 cells and remained significantly increased even 67 h after the treatment. Flow-cytometric determination of the distribution of MMC-treated P19 and EPI-7 within the cell cycle revealed a distinct G2/M-block in P19 cells, whereas EPI-7 cells showed normal progression through S-phase and a negligible G2/M-block. Therefore, we conclude that the lower effectivity of MMC to induce gene mutations and micronuclei in P19 cells seemed to be correlated with a more efficient cell cycle control in undifferentiated compared to differentiated EPI-7 cells.