1
|
Vanzhula I, Hagan K, Duck SA, Pan I, Wang EY, Steinglass J, Attia E, Wildes JE, Guarda AS, Schreyer C. Eating disorder symptom non-endorsers in hospitalised patients with anorexia nervosa: Who are they? EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2024; 32:795-808. [PMID: 38528330 DOI: 10.1002/erv.3087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Impaired insight and illness denial are common in anorexia nervosa (AN). Missing an AN diagnosis may delay treatment and negatively impact outcomes. METHOD The current retrospective study examined the prevalence and characteristics of AN symptom non-endorsement (i.e., scoring within the normal range on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire [EDE-Q] or the Eating Disorder Examination [EDE] interview) in three independent samples of hospitalised patients with AN (N1 = 154; N2 = 300; N3 = 194). A qualitative chart review of a subsample of non-endorsers (N4 = 32) extracted reports of disordered eating behaviours observed by the treatment team. RESULTS The prevalence of non-endorsement ranged from 11% to 34% across sites. Non-endorsers were more likely to be diagnosed with AN restricting type (AN-R) and reported fewer symptoms of co-occurring psychopathology than endorsers. Groups benefitted equally from treatment. The qualitative chart review indicated that objective symptoms of AN were recorded by staff in over 90% of non-endorsers. CONCLUSIONS Eating disorder symptom assessments using the EDE-Q or EDE may miss symptomatology in up to a third of individuals hospitalised with AN. This study highlights the potential utility of multi-modal assessment including patient interviews, collateral informants, and behavioural observation to circumvent non-endorsement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Vanzhula
- University of Kansas, LifeSpan Institute, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelsey Hagan
- Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Ann Duck
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Isabella Pan
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Erin Y Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joanna Steinglass
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia, New York, USA
| | - Evelyn Attia
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer E Wildes
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angela S Guarda
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Colleen Schreyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor CM, Wernimont SM, Northstone K, Emmett PM. Picky/fussy eating in children: Review of definitions, assessment, prevalence and dietary intakes. Appetite 2015; 95:349-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
3
|
Cardona Cano S, Tiemeier H, Van Hoeken D, Tharner A, Jaddoe VWV, Hofman A, Verhulst FC, Hoek HW. Trajectories of picky eating during childhood: A general population study. Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:570-9. [PMID: 25644130 DOI: 10.1002/eat.22384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 12/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This cohort study describes the prevalence of picky eating and examines prognostic factors for picky eating trajectories during childhood. METHODS 4,018 participants of a population-based cohort with measurements from pregnancy onwards were included. Picky eating was assessed by maternal report when children were 1.5, 3, and 6 years old. The associations of child and family characteristics with trajectories of picky eating were examined using logistic regression. Never picky eaters were used as the reference group. RESULTS Prevalence of picky eating was 26.5% at 1.5 years of age, 27.6% at the age of 3 and declined to 13.2% at 6 years. Four main picky eating trajectories were defined: (1) never picky eating at all three assessments (55% of children), (2) remitting (0-4 years, 32%), (3) late-onset (6 years only, 4%), and (4) persistent (all ages, 4%). This implies that almost two thirds of the early picky eaters remitted within 3 years. Male sex, lower birth weight, non-Western maternal ethnicity, and low parental income predicted persistent picky eating. More often late-onset picky eaters were children of parents with low income and non-Western ethnicity. DISCUSSION We found that nearly half (46%) of children were picky eaters at some point during early childhood. Remittance was very high. This suggests that picky eating is usually a transient behavior and part of normal development in preschool children. However, a substantial group of persistent picky eaters, often from a socially disadvantaged background, continues to have problems beyond the preschool age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Cardona Cano
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Henning Tiemeier
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne Tharner
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent W V Jaddoe
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Hofman
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank C Verhulst
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans W Hoek
- Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York.,Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|