Dealing with high dimensionality for the identification of common and rare variants as main effects and for gene-environment interaction

A comparison of two collapsing methods in different approaches

Sequencing technologies have enabled the investigation of whole genomes of many individuals in parallel. Studies have shown that the joint consideration of multiple rare variants may explain a relevant proportion of the genetic basis for disease so that grouping of rare variants, termed collapsing, can enrich the association signal.

Following this assumption, we investigate the type I error and the power of two proposed collapsing methods (combined multivariate and collapsing method and the functional principal component analysis [FPCA]-based statistic) using the case-control data provided for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 with knowledge of the true model. Variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.05 or less were collapsed per gene for combined multivariate and collapsing. Neither of the methods detected any of the truly associated genes reliably. Although combined multivariate and collapsing identified one gene with a power of 0.66, it had an unacceptably high false-positive rate of 75%. In contrast, FPCA covered the type I error level well but at the cost of low power. A strict filtering of variants by small MAF might lead to a better performance of the collapsing methods. Furthermore, the inclusion of information on functionality of the variants could be helpful.

Molecular genetic gene-environment studies using candidate genes in schizophrenia: a systematic review

The relatively high heritability of schizophrenia suggests that genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of the disorder. On the other hand, a number of environmental factors significantly influence its incidence. As few direct genetic effects have been demonstrated, and there is considerable inter-individual heterogeneity in the response to the known environmental factors, interactions between genetic and environmental factors may be important in determining whether an individual develops the disorder. To date, a considerable number of studies of gene-environment interactions (G×E) in schizophrenia have employed a hypothesis-based molecular genetic approach using candidate genes, which have led to a range of different findings. This systematic review aims to summarize the results from molecular genetic candidate studies and to review challenges and opportunities of this approach in psychosis research. Finally, we discuss the potential of future prospects, such as new studies that combine hypothesis-based molecular genetic candidate approaches with agnostic genome-wide association studies in determining schizophrenia risk.

Lessons learned from Genetic Analysis Workshop 17: transitioning from genome-wide association studies to whole-genome statistical genetic analysis

Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) focused on the transition from genome-wide association study designs and methods to the study designs and statistical genetic methods that will be required for the analysis of next-generation sequence data including both common and rare sequence variants. In the 166 contributions to GAW17, a wide variety of statistical methods were applied to simulated traits in population- and family-based samples, and results from these analyses were compared to the known generating model. In general, many of the statistical genetic methods used in the population-based sample identified causal sequence variants (SVs) when the estimated locus-specific heritability, as measured in the population-based sample, was greater than about 0.08. However, SVs with locus-specific heritabilities less than 0.03 were rarely identified consistently. In the family-based samples, many of the methods detected SVs that were rarer than those detected in the population-based sample, but the estimated locus-specific heritabilities for these rare SVs, as measured in the family-based samples, were substantially higher (>0.2) than their corresponding heritabilities in the population-based samples. Substantial inflation of the type I error rate was observed across a wide variety of statistical methods. Although many of the contributions found little inflation in type I error for Q4, a trait with no causal SVs, type I error rates for Q1 and Q2 were well above their nominal levels with the inflation for Q1 being higher than that for Q2. It seems likely that this inflation in type I error is due to correlations among SVs.