1
|
Pini S, Carpita B, Nardi B, Abelli M, Amatori G, Cremone I, Dell'Osso L. Admixture Analysis of Age of Onset in Bipolar Disorder and Impact of Anxiety Comorbidity. Cureus 2024; 16:e55803. [PMID: 38463410 PMCID: PMC10923198 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to examine clinical differences between subjects with early-onset (<21 years) and adult-onset (>30 years) bipolar I disorder, in particular, in relation to anxiety comorbidity. METHOD Subjects were selected from a cohort of 161 consecutive patients with bipolar disorder type I as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorder (SCID-I). Clinical characteristics and axis I comorbidity were compared between those whose illness first emerged before the age of 21 years (n=58) and those whose first episode occurred after the age of 30 years (n=27). Psychopathology was assessed using the 18-item version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The frequency of delusions, hallucinations, and formal thought disorders was evaluated with the SCID-I. Overall, social and occupational functioning was assessed by the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). RESULTS Most subjects with early-onset bipolar disorder were males, had panic disorder and substance abuse comorbidity, longer duration of illness, exhibited mood-incongruent delusions, and presented with a mixed episode at onset more frequently than the later adult-onset subjects. Mixed mania at the first episode of illness and lifetime panic disorder comorbidity predicted mixed polarity at the first hospitalization episode in the early-onset subjects. CONCLUSIONS Overall, early age at onset seems to delineate a distinct bipolar I disorder subtype characterized by a greater likelihood of mixed episodes, lifetime panic disorder comorbidity, and schizophrenia-like delusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Pini
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | - Barbara Carpita
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | - Benedetta Nardi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | - Marianna Abelli
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | - Giulia Amatori
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | - Ivan Cremone
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, ITA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Which patients with bipolar depression receive antidepressant augmentation? Results from an observational multicenter study. CNS Spectr 2022; 27:731-739. [PMID: 34505564 DOI: 10.1017/s109285292100078x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify demographic and clinical characteristics of bipolar depressed patients who require antidepressant (AD) augmentation, and to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of this therapeutic strategy. METHODS One hundred twenty-two bipolar depressed patients were consecutively recruited, 71.7% of them received mood stabilizers (MS)/second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) with AD-augmentation and 28.3% did not. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and after 12 weeks and 15 months of treatment. RESULTS The AD-augmentation was significantly higher in patients with bipolar II compared with bipolar I diagnosis. Patients with MS/SGA + AD had often a seasonal pattern, depressive polarity onset, depressive index episode with anxious features, a low number of previous psychotic and (hypo)manic episodes and of switch. They had a low irritable premorbid temperament, a low risk of suicide attempts, and a low number of manic symptoms at baseline. After 12 weeks of treatment, 82% of patients receiving ADs improved, 58% responded and 51% remitted, 3.8% had suicidal thoughts or projects, 6.1% had (hypo)manic switch, and 4.1% needed hospitalization. During the following 12 months, 92% of them remitted from index episode, 25.5% did not relapse, and 11% needed hospitalization. Although at the start advantaged, patients with AD-augmentation, compared with those without AD-augmentation, did not significantly differ on any outcome as well on adverse events in the short- and long-term treatment. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that ADs, combined with MS and/or SGA, are short and long term effective and safe in a specific subgroup for bipolar depressed patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnold I, Dehning J, Grunze A, Hausmann A. Old Age Bipolar Disorder-Epidemiology, Aetiology and Treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57060587. [PMID: 34201098 PMCID: PMC8226928 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Data regarding older age bipolar disorder (OABD) are sparse. Two major groups are classified as patients with first occurrence of mania in old age, the so called “late onset” patients (LOBD), and the elder patients with a long-standing clinical history, the so called “early onset” patients (EOBD). The aim of the present literature review is to provide more information on specific issues concerning OABD, such as epidemiology, aetiology and treatments outcomes. We conducted a Medline literature search from 1970–2021 using the MeSH terms “bipolar disorder” and “aged” or “geriatric” or “elderly”. The additional literature was retrieved by examining cross references and by a hand search in textbooks. With sparse data on the treatment of OABD, current guidelines concluded that first-line treatment of OABD should be similar to that for working-age bipolar disorder, with specific attention to side effects, somatic comorbidities and specific risks of OABD. With constant monitoring and awareness of the possible toxic drug interactions, lithium is a safe drug for OABD patients, both in mania and maintenance. Lamotrigine and lurasidone could be considered in bipolar depression. Mood stabilizers, rather than second generation antipsychotics, are the treatment of choice for maintenance. If medication fails, electroconvulsive therapy is recommended for mania, mixed states and depression, and can also be offered for continuation and maintenance treatment. Preliminary results also support a role of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in old age BD. The recommended treatments for OABD include lithium and antiepileptics such as valproic acid and lamotrigine, and lurasidone for bipolar depression, although the evidence is still weak. Combined psychosocial and pharmacological treatments also appear to be a treatment of choice for OABD. More research is needed on the optimal pharmacological and psychosocial approaches to OABD, as well as their combination and ranking in an evidence-based therapy algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Arnold
- Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Julia Dehning
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-512-504-83802
| | - Anna Grunze
- Psychiatrisches Zentrum Nordbaden, 69168 Wiesloch, Germany;
| | - Armand Hausmann
- Private Practice, Wilhelm-Greil-Straße 5, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Liang J, Xia Q, Zhou X, Xie X. Effects of Lithium Combined with Second-Generation Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Manic Episodes in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Naturalistic Study in China. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020; 16:2623-2632. [PMID: 33177826 PMCID: PMC7649218 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s270596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the therapeutic effects of lithium combined with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) of quetiapine, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone for the treatment of manic episodes in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to guide the selection of medications. METHODS We examined the case data of patients with BD who experienced manic episodes and were hospitalized in a Class 3A Psychiatric Hospital in Anhui Province from January 2015 to October 2019. The enrolled patients were rated using the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) before and after treatment, and relevant adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS Analysis of the collected case data of 182 patients showed significant differences in the BRMS scores on admission and at discharge of patients treated with lithium combined with each SGA. The chi-square test showed no obvious difference in the final therapeutic effects of lithium combined with each of the four SGAs (χ2 = 7.365, P = 0.146). However, there were differences in the incidence of adverse effects (χ 2 = 10.604, P = 0.014) and remission rate after 2 weeks of treatment (χ2 = 10.174, P = 0.017). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the incidence of adverse effects was related to the length of stay in hospital and clozapine treatment. The remission rate after 2 weeks was associated with the length of stay in hospital, clozapine treatment, and age of onset. CONCLUSION Lithium combined with SGAs (quetiapine, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) effectively improves the manic symptoms of patients with BD who experience manic episodes. Lithium combined with quetiapine for the treatment of bipolar manic episode has advantages with respect to the speed of effective and incidence of adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China.,Department of Pharmacy, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Hefei 230000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Pharmacy, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Hefei 230000, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingrong Xia
- Department of Pharmacy, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Hefei 230000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Xie
- Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rej S, Quayle W, Forester BP, Dols A, Gatchel J, Chen P, Gough S, Fox R, Sajatovic M, Strejilevich SA, Eyler LT. Measurement tools for assessment of older age bipolar disorder: A systematic review of the recent global literature. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20:359-369. [PMID: 29108106 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Revised: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES More than 50% of people with bipolar disorder will be age 60 years or older by 2030. There is a need for more data to guide assessment and treatment in older age bipolar disorder (OABD); however, interpretation of findings from small, single-site studies may not be generalizable and there are few large trials. As a step in the direction of coordinated large-scale OABD data collection, it is critical to identify which measurements are currently used and identify potential gaps in domains typically assessed. METHODS An international group of OABD experts performed a systematic literature review to identify studies examining OABD in the past 6 years. Relevant articles were assessed to categorize the types of clinical, cognitive, biomarker, and neuroimaging OABD tools routinely used in OABD studies. RESULTS A total of 53 papers were identified, with a broad range of assessments. Most studies evaluated demographic and clinical domains, with fewer studies assessing cognition. There are relatively few biomarker and neuroimaging data, and data collection methods were less comprehensively covered. CONCLUSION Assessment tools used in the recent OABD literature may help to identify both a minimum and a comprehensive dataset that should be evaluated in OABD. Our review also highlights gaps where key clinical outcomes have not been routinely assessed. Biomarker and neuroimaging assessment could be further developed and standardized. Clinical data could be combined with neuroimaging, genetic, and other biomarkers in large-scale coordinated data collection to further improve our understanding of OABD phenomenology and biology, thereby contributing to research that advances care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soham Rej
- GeriPARTy Group, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - William Quayle
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brent P Forester
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Annemiek Dols
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, EMGO Institute of Care and Health Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Gatchel
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peijun Chen
- Departments of Psychiatry& Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Centre, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Psychiatry Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sarah Gough
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca Fox
- GeriPARTy Group, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- Departments of Psychiatry& Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Centre, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sergio A Strejilevich
- Bipolar Disorder Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lisa T Eyler
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Desert-Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rej S, Herrmann N, Shulman K, Fischer HD, Fung K, Gruneir A. Current psychotropic medication prescribing patterns in late-life bipolar disorder. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 32:1459-1465. [PMID: 27911003 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2016] [Revised: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many patients with bipolar disorder are reaching old age, but whether they are receiving evidence-based psychotropic treatment remains unclear. Our objective was to describe current psychotropic prescribing patterns in a large Canadian late-life bipolar sample. METHODS Population-based cross-sectional study of 1443 bipolar disorder patients aged ≥ 66, discharged from a psychiatric hospitalization in Ontario, Canada from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2012. We described psychotropic medication prescribing within 30 days post-discharge. RESULTS Prescription of ≥2 psychotropic medications was highly prevalent (81.5%). The most common medications were atypical antipsychotics (75.3%), benzodiazepines/zopiclone (42.3%), and antidepressants (38.5%), with less frequent use of valproate (35.4%) and lithium (23.4%). Only 1.4% of patients were on lithium monotherapy, while 4.4% and 15.7% of patients were on antidepressant or atypical antipsychotic monotherapy; 8.9% of all patients were using ≥2 atypical antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, older adults hospitalized with bipolar disorder are often prescribed multiple psychotropic medications upon discharge. In many instances, practices did not reflect bipolar treatment guidelines and may be putting patients at risk for poor physical health and psychiatric outcomes. One such example is the very infrequent use of lithium monotherapy. Future research should examine whether health system-wide protocolized late-life bipolar treatment may optimize prescribing to improve effectiveness and safety. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soham Rej
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nathan Herrmann
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kenneth Shulman
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Kinwah Fung
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Gruneir
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García-López A, Ezquiaga E, De Dios C, Agud JL. Depressive symptoms in early- and late-onset older bipolar patients compared with younger ones. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 32:201-207. [PMID: 27017999 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Revised: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine clinical and outcome differences between older bipolar patients with early onset (EO) and late onset (LO) of the illness and between younger and EO older patients with a bipolar disorder under long-term treatment in an outpatient clinical setting. METHODS Three hundred ninety-five bipolar I and II outpatients were followed up for up to 7.7 years. Of these, 213 younger (<50 years) and 88 older (>60 years) patients were included. In the older subsample, 50 EO patients (onset <50 years) versus 38 LO patients (≥50 years) were analyzed. Likewise, younger versus EO older patients were compared. RESULTS The likelihood of LO older patients of being bipolar II was higher than for EO older patients. They were also diagnosed earlier than EO older patients. No other clinical differences at baseline and at the prospective follow-up were found. Compared with younger patients, EO older patients had more frequent depressive symptoms at baseline, suffered more major depressive episodes in the previous year and in the prospective follow-up, received more antidepressants at baseline, had higher rates of medical comorbid conditions and were less likely to be tobacco smokers. CONCLUSIONS Older patients constitute a meaningful proportion of bipolar patients under treatment. EO older patients suffered significantly from more frequent depressive symptoms than younger ones. LO older patients were predominantly bipolar II. So as bipolar illness progressed, depressive symptomatology became more frequent and manic episodes were less severe. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elena Ezquiaga
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Consuelo De Dios
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Agud
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qiu F, Akiskal HS, Kelsoe JR, Greenwood TA. Factor analysis of temperament and personality traits in bipolar patients: Correlates with comorbidity and disorder severity. J Affect Disord 2017; 207:282-290. [PMID: 27741464 PMCID: PMC5107122 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temperament and personality traits have been suggested as endophenotypes for bipolar disorder based on several lines of evidence, including heritability. Previous work suggested an anxious-reactive factor identified across temperament and personality inventories that produced significant group discrimination and could potentially be useful in genetic analyses. We have attempted to further characterize this factor structure in a sample of bipolar patients. METHODS A sample of 1195 subjects with bipolar I disorder was evaluated, all with complete data available. Dimension reduction across two inventories identified 18 factors explaining 39% of the variance. RESULTS The two largest factors reflected affective instability and general anxiety/worry, respectively. Subsequent analyses of the clinical features associated with bipolar disorder revealed specificity for the factors in a predictable pattern. Cluster analysis of the factors identified a subgroup defined by a strong lack of general anxiety and low affective instability represented by the first two factors. The remaining subjects could be distinguished into two clusters by the presence of either more positive characteristics, including persistence/drive, spirituality, expressivity, and humor, or more negative characteristics of depression and anxiety. LIMITATIONS These analyses involved bipolar I subjects only and must be extended to other bipolar spectrum diagnoses, unaffected relatives, and individuals at risk. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that temperament and personality measures access latent traits associated with important clinical features of bipolar disorder. By translating clinical variables into quantitative traits, we may identify subgroups of bipolar patients with distinct clinical profiles, thereby facilitating both individual treatment strategies and genetic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Qiu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Hagop S. Akiskal
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, CA,International Mood Center, La Jolla, CA
| | - John R. Kelsoe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, CA,Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tiffany A. Greenwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Address correspondence to: Tiffany A. Greenwood, Ph.D. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0689, La Jolla, CA 92093, Phone: 858-246-1897,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sani G, Chiapponi C, Piras F, Ambrosi E, Simonetti A, Danese E, Janiri D, Brugnoli R, De Filippis S, Caltagirone C, Girardi P, Spalletta G. Gray and white matter trajectories in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2016; 18:52-62. [PMID: 26782273 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Findings on brain structural abnormalities in patients with bipolar disorder (BP) are inconsistent and little is known about age-related evolution of these changes. We employed a cross-sectional, case-control study to compare structural age-related brain trajectories in patients with BP and healthy control subjects (HC) over a period of approximately 50 years. The primary aim was to understand whether white (WM) and gray matter (GM) abnormalities are present from the beginning of the illness and how they change over time. METHODS Seventy-eight patients with BP and 78 HC matched for age, gender, and educational level underwent a high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging protocol. A voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was used to capture GM and WM differences between subjects with BP and HC. Factorial analysis of covariance was used to compare brain volume alterations at different ages between the groups. RESULTS We found an age-related atrophy in GM and WM volumes both in patients with BP and HC. A main effect of diagnosis emerged in the posterior cingulate cortex bilaterally, in the right thalamus, in the cerebellum bilaterally, and in the left posterior limb of the internal capsule. No interaction between diagnosis and age emerged, indicating that the volumes of these areas were permanently reduced in subjects with BP throughout the entire age range under investigation. CONCLUSIONS Brain alterations in patients with BP are present from the beginning of the illness and remain stable over time. All the affected areas are involved in mood and psychomotor control process. This suggests a possible neurodevelopmental involvement in the mechanism of BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Sani
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy.,Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Chiapponi
- Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.,Department of Medicine of Systems, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Piras
- Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.,Enrico Fermi Center for Study and Research, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Ambrosi
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy
| | - Alessio Simonetti
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy.,Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Danese
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy
| | - Delfina Janiri
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy.,Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Brugnoli
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Caltagirone
- Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.,Department of Medicine of Systems, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Girardi
- Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs Department (NESMOS), Sapienza University, Rome, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Italy.,Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Spalletta
- Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.,Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sajatovic M, Strejilevich SA, Gildengers AG, Dols A, Al Jurdi RK, Forester BP, Kessing LV, Beyer J, Manes F, Rej S, Rosa AR, Schouws SNTM, Tsai SY, Young RC, Shulman KI. A report on older-age bipolar disorder from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force. Bipolar Disord 2015; 17:689-704. [PMID: 26384588 PMCID: PMC4623878 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the coming generation, older adults with bipolar disorder (BD) will increase in absolute numbers as well as proportion of the general population. This is the first report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorder (ISBD) Task Force on Older-Age Bipolar Disorder (OABD). METHODS This task force report addresses the unique aspects of OABD including epidemiology and clinical features, neuropathology and biomarkers, physical health, cognition, and care approaches. RESULTS The report describes an expert consensus summary on OABD that is intended to advance the care of patients, and shed light on issues of relevance to BD research across the lifespan. Although there is still a dearth of research and health efforts focused on older adults with BD, emerging data have brought some answers, innovative questions, and novel perspectives related to the notion of late onset, medical comorbidity, and the vexing issue of cognitive impairment and decline. CONCLUSIONS Improving our understanding of the biological, clinical, and social underpinnings relevant to OABD is an indispensable step in building a complete map of BD across the lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Sajatovic
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sergio A Strejilevich
- Bipolar Disorder Program, Neurosciences Institute, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ariel G Gildengers
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Annemiek Dols
- GGZinGeest, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rayan K Al Jurdi
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brent P Forester
- Geriatric Psychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lars Vedel Kessing
- Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Beyer
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Facundo Manes
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- UPD-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UNIFCoN), Chile
- National Scientific and Technical Rsearch Council (CONICET), Argentina
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australia
| | - Soham Rej
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Geri PARTy Research Group, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Adriane R Rosa
- Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Department of Pharmacology, Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, INCT for Translational Medicine–CNPq, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Sigfried NTM Schouws
- GGZ inGeest, Department of Psychiatry, EMGO Institute of Care and Health Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shang-Ying Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Robert C Young
- Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, White Plains, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth I Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Forester BP, Ajilore O, Spino C, Lehmann S. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Late Life Bipolar Disorder in the Community: Data from the NNDC Registry. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 23:977-84. [PMID: 25670662 PMCID: PMC4503521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2014] [Revised: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical characteristics of older and younger patients with bipolar disorder enrolled in the United States' National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Clinical Care Registry (CCR). DESIGN Multicenter, de-identified naturalistic data from the National NNDC's CCR for all patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder who were enrolled in the registry as of April 25, 2013. PARTICIPANTS Community-dwelling patients (N = 218), ages 18 years or older, with bipolar disorder diagnosis recruited by NNDC-affiliated medical centers to participate in the NNDC CCR. Subjects aged 55 years or older were compared with subjects younger than age 55 years on clinical measures. MEASUREMENTS Patient Health Questionnaire; Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report; Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale; Work and Social Adjustment Scale; Frequency and Intensity of Burden of Side Effects Rating; and the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire. RESULTS A greater percentage of older patients were prescribed antidepressant medications (71.9% versus 50.0%), and the younger cohort had significantly more psychostimulant use (16.7% versus 0%). Younger patients endorsed significantly more depressive symptoms compared with older patients. The mean number of psychotropic medications was not different in both older and younger patients with bipolar disorder. There was no statistically significant difference in frequency, intensity, or burden of psychotropic medication side effects as measured by the Frequency and Intensity of Burden of Side Effects Rating. CONCLUSION Findings of higher antidepressant use rates in the older cohort, combined with lower depression symptom severity and a similar degree of manic symptoms, suggests the possibility that older adults with bipolar disorder may have improved antidepressant efficacy and lower switch rates into manic or mixed states compared with younger cohorts. Ongoing data collection by the NNDC CCR will add to current knowledge to inform the care of older patients with bipolar disorder by providing multi-site data regarding phenomenology, treatment response, and longitudinal course of late life bipolar disorder in community settings.
Collapse
|