Clinical and radiological characteristics of early versus late mild cognitive impairment in patients with comorbid depressive disorder

Models of depressive pseudoamnestic disorder

Objective

Little effort has been made in the past to validate depressive pseudodementia based on hypothesis-driven approaches. We extended this concept to individuals with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Major Depression, that is, pseudodepressive amnestic disorder. We tested two hypotheses consistent with the presentations and mechanisms associated with this potential syndrome: improvements in cognition would be significantly correlated with improvements in depression after treatment (Hypothesis 1), and if not confirmed, the presence of such an association could be identified once moderator variables were taken into account (Hypothesis 2).

Methods

Within a clinical trial, 61 individuals received open label serotonin reuptake inhibitor (citalopram or venlafaxine) treatment over a 16-week period. Selective Reminding Test and Hamilton Depression scale were conducted serially to measure change in memory and depression, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging, other cognitive measures (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive and speed of processing tests), and additional depression measure (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) were also administered.

Results

No significant associations between improvement in depression and improvement in cognition were observed. Sensitivity analyses with other cognitive measures, the BDI, and exclusion of possible "placebo" responders were negative as well. There were no significant moderation effects for baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression as a measure of symptom severity or age. APOE ε4 genotype and white matter hyperintensity burden yielded counter-intuitive, albeit marginally significant results.

Conclusions

Negative findings cast doubt on the frequency of depressive pseudoamnestic disorder in older populations with documented depression and memory impairments.

A Stacking Framework for Multi-Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Neuroimaging and Clinical Features

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a severe health problem. Challenges still remain in early diagnosis. Objective: The objective of this study was to build a Stacking framework for multi-classification of AD by a combination of neuroimaging and clinical features to improve the performance. Methods: The data we used were from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database with a total of 493 subjects, including 125 normal control (NC), 121 early mild cognitive impairment, 109 late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and 138 AD. We selected structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) features by voting strategy. The imaging features, demographic information, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale were combined together as classification features. We proposed a two-layer Stacking ensemble framework to classify four types of people. The first layer represented support vector machine, random forests, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision tree; the second layer was a logistic regression classifier. Additionally, we analyzed performance of only sMRI feature and combined features and compared the proposed model with four base classifiers. Results: The Stacking model combined with sMRI and non-imaging features outshined four base classifiers with an average accuracy of 86.96% . Compared with using sMRI data alone, sMRI combined with non-imaging features significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, especially in NC versus LMCI and LMCI versus AD by 14.08% . Conclusion: The Stacking framework we used can improve performance in diagnosis of AD using combined features.

The Role of Apolipoprotein E ε4 in Early and Late Mild Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is highly associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the specific influence of APOE ε4 status on tau pathology and cognitive decline in early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI) is poorly understood. Our goal was to evaluate the association of APOE ε4 with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau levels and cognition in EMCI and LMCI patients in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database, and whether this association was mediated by amyloid-β (Aβ).

METHODS

Participants were 269 cognitively normal (CN), 262 EMCI, and 344 LMCI patients. They underwent CSF Aβ42 and tau detection, APOE ε4 genotyping, Mini-Mental State Examination, (MMSE), and Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS)-cog assessments. Linear regressions were used to examine the relation of APOE ε4 and CSF tau levels and cognitive scores in persons with and without Aβ deposition (Aβ+ and Aβ-).

RESULTS

The prevalence of APOE ε4 is higher in EMCI and LMCI than in CN (p < 0.001 for both), and in LMCI than in EMCI (p = 0.001). APOE ε4 allele was significantly higher in Aβ+ subjects than in Aβ- subjects (p < 0.001). Subjects who had a lower CSF Aβ42 level and were APOE ε4-positive experienced higher levels of CSF tau and cognitive scores in EMCI and/or LMCI.

CONCLUSIONS

An APOE ε4 allele is associated with increased CSF tau and worse cognition in both EMCI and LMCI, and this association may be mediated by Aβ. We conclude that APOE ε4 may be an important mediator of tau pathology and cognition in the early stages of AD.

Odor identification impairment and cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated acute change in odor identification following atropine nasal spray challenge, and 8-week change in odor identification ability, as a predictor of long-term improvement in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who received open-label cholinesterase inhibitor treatment.

METHODS

In patients with clinical AD, the University of Pennsylvania Smell identification Test (UPSIT) was administered before and after an anticholinergic atropine nasal spray challenge. Patients were then treated with donepezil for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

In 21 study participants, acute atropine-induced decrease in UPSIT was not associated with change in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) or Selective Reminding Test (SRT). Decline in odor identification performance from baseline to week 8 was indicative of a future decline in cognitive performance over 52 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Change in odor identification with atropine challenge is not a useful predictor of treatment response to cholinesterase inhibitors. Short-term change in odor identification performance needs further investigation as a potential predictor of cognitive improvement with cholinesterase inhibitor treatment.