Prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychogeriatric outpatients

Delirium in psychiatric settings: risk factors and assessment tools in patients with psychiatric illness: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common disorder affecting patients' psychiatric illness, characterized by a high rate of underdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and high risks. However, previous studies frequently excluded patients with psychiatric illness, leading to limited knowledge about risk factors and optimal assessment tools for delirium in psychiatric settings.

OBJECTIVES

The scoping review was carried out to (1) identify the risk factors associated with delirium in patients with psychiatric illness; (2) synthesize the performance of assessment tools for detecting delirium in patients with psychiatric illness in psychiatric settings.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to identify primary studies on delirium in psychiatric settings from inception to Dec 2023 inclusive. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies against inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was conducted.

RESULTS

A final set of 36 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, two main themes were extracted: risk factors associated with delirium in patients with psychiatric illness and assessment tools for detecting delirium in psychiatric settings. The risk factors associated with delirium primarily included advanced age, physical comorbid, types of psychiatric illness, antipsychotics, anticholinergic drug, Electroconvulsive therapy, and the combination of lithium and Electroconvulsive therapy. Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, and Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional might be valuable for delirium assessment in patients with psychiatric illness in psychiatric settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Delirium diagnosis in psychiatric settings is complex due to the overlapping clinical manifestations between psychiatric illness and delirium, as well as their potential co-occurrence. It is imperative to understand the risk factors and assessment methods related to delirium in this population to address diagnostic delays, establish effective prevention and screening strategies. Future research should focus on designing, implementing, and evaluating interventions that target modifiable risk factors, to prevent and manage delirium in patients with psychiatric illness.

Evaluation of Delirium Among Elders in the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Health care professionals underestimate the recognition of delirium in emergency departments (EDs). In these settings, between 57% and 83% of cases of delirium go undetected. When delirium occurs, it causes an increase in the length of hospitalization, readmissions within 30 days, and mortality. No studies were carried out in Italy to assess the prevalence of delirium among elders in EDs.

OBJECTIVES

The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of the risk of delirium in people 65 years and older hospitalized in the ED for a minimum of 8 hours. The study's secondary goal was to identify the variables that influenced the risk of delirium.

METHOD

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 EDs. The risk of delirium was assessed using the delirium screening tool 4 A's test. One hundred patients were enrolled. Data collection took place from June 28 to August 31, 2022.

RESULTS

The risk of delirium was detected in 29% of the sample, whereas the risk of cognitive impairment was 13%. The use of psychotropic drugs increased the risk of delirium by 11.8 times (odds ratio [OR], 11.80; P = .003). Bed confinement increased the risk by 4.3 times (OR, 4.31; P = .009). Being dehydrated increased the risk of onset by 4.6 times (OR, 4.62; P = .010). Having dementia increased the risk of delirium manifestation by 4.4 times (OR, 4.35; P = .021).

DISCUSSION

The risk of delirium was detected in a considerable portion of the sample. The results of this study can be used by health care professionals to implement preventive measures as well as support clinical judgment and establish priorities of care for patients at risk of developing delirium.

CRP/albumin, Glasgow prognostic score, and prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of mortality among delirium patients

BACKGROUND

With the older populations growing each year, high mortality rates make delirium a valuable topic.

AIM

We aimed to analyze the parameters that could predict 30 days of mortality of the patients diagnosed in the emergency department (ED) with delirium.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 85 patients with a diagnosis of delirium. Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin values of the patients and 30-day mortality rate were computed. The effectiveness of GPS, PNI, and CRP/albumin parameters in predicting 30-day mortality was analyzed.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the optimal cut-off value for albumin as determined by Youden's index in estimation of 30-day mortality was ≤ 36.8 [AUC: 0.830 (95% CI: 0.733-0.903; p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 85.71% and specificity of 76.36%], while cut-off value for CRP/albumin was > 0.974 [AUC: 0.753 (95% CI: 0.647-0.840; p < 0.001); with a sensitivity of 85.71% and specificity of 70.51%], and cut-off value for PNI was ≤ 39.05 [AUC: 0.850 (95% CI: 0.756-0.918; p < 0.001) sensitivity 71.43% and specificity 92.31%]. Significant effectiveness of the values of GPS (odds ratio (OR) = 6.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-26.37), PNI (OR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74-0.95), albumin (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.94), and CAD (OR = 10.5; 95% CI: 1.85-59.45) was observed for predicting mortality in univariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings obtained in this study suggest that GPS, PNI, and albumin parameters could be used to guide the clinician in predicting the 30-day mortality of patients diagnosed with delirium.

Determinants of delirium in elderly in-patients in a general ward setting in a teaching hospital: A case control study

Background

There is a dearth of research on risk factors of delirium among elderly inpatients in nonintensive low resource settings.

Aim

To determine the risk factors of delirium in elderly inpatients in a nonintensive care unit setting.

Materials and Methods

Sixty two elderly patients with delirium (cases) and 62 patients without delirium (controls) were administered a semi-structured proforma with socio-demographic variables and putative predisposing and precipitating risk factors and the Vellore screening instrument for dementia.

Results

On univariate analysis, factors such as past cognitive impairment, history of nocturnal confusion and delirium, diminished daily living activities, severe medical illness, history of psychiatric illness, presence of dementia, infection, fever above 1000F, abnormal electrolytes abnormal RFT, leukocytes in urine, hypoxia, anticholinergics and benzodiazepines, emergency admission, use of physical restraints, bladder catheterization, more than routine investigations, intensive care unit admission, surgery, and duration of hospital stay more than 10 days were found to be significantly associated with delirium. On multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression, bladder catheterization (odds ratio [OR] = 13.85; confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-133.14), abnormal electrolytes (OR = 5.12; CI = 1.11-23.69), and hypoxia (OR = 75.52; CI = 4.64-1.134E3) were detected to be independently associated with delirium.

Conclusion

Acute modifiable rather than long-term factors were risk factors for delirium among the elderly. An awareness of modifiable risk factors has the potential of developing targeted interventions for the early mitigation of delirium.

Risk factors, preventive interventions, overlapping symptoms, and clinical measures of delirium in elderly patients

Delirium is an acute reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome caused by multiple factors. It is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes including cognitive impairment, functional decline, prolonged hospitalization, and increased nursing service. The prevalence of delirium was high in department of cardiology, geriatric, and intensive care unit of hospital. With the increase in the aged population, further increases in delirium seem likely. However, it remains poorly recognized in the clinical practice. This article comprehensively discusses the latest research perspectives on the epidemiological data, risk factors, preventive interventions, overlapping symptoms, and clinical measures of delirium, including specific measures to manage delirium in clinical real-world situations. This article helps readers improve their knowledge and understanding of delirium and helps clinicians quickly identify and implement timely therapeutic measures to address various delirium subtypes that occur in the clinical settings to ensure patients are treated as aggressively as possible.

Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat delirium in older people: An overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

As advanced age is a major risk factor for confusion status, delirium has become prevalent in the older population, contributing to longer hospital stays, cognitive impairment, and higher risks of complications and mortality. Compared with pharmacological methods, non-pharmacological interventions are preferred and are recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the prevention of delirium. Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been carried out to investigate the effects of non-pharmacological interventions. However, the outcomes were diverse and the quality varied widely, making it challenging to draw firm conclusions from the evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the contents and evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat delirium among older people.

DESIGN

Overview of systematic reviews.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, JBI EBP Database, China's SinoMed, CNKI, and Wangfang databases from inception to 2nd December 2022. Two reviewers performed the study selection, quality appraisal, and data extraction independently. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of eligible reviews. The results were presented in narrative synthesis based on types of intervention, including multicomponent and single-component interventions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four systematic reviews were included in this overview, of which four reviews were of high quality. Multicomponent interventions were the most widely disseminated non-pharmacological strategy, which were effective in preventing delirium with 27 %-54 % reduction in delirium incidence. Additionally, the multicomponent strategy also reduced the incidence of falls and pressure ulcers, and showed trends toward shortening the length of stay and improving cognitive function. Among single-component interventions, physical training, geriatric risk assessment, and reorientation protocol revealed positive effects in delirium prevention. However, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for treating delirium was limited, and while multicomponent methods had inconsistent impacts on the duration and severity of delirium, single-component methods showed no significant impact.

CONCLUSION

Non-pharmacological interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of delirium and improving other health outcomes among older patients. However, the effects on the duration and severity of delirium need more evidence to confirm.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022376651 in PROSPERO.

Alpha-synuclein pre-formed fibrils injected into prefrontal cortex primarily spread to cortical and subcortical structures and lead to isolated behavioral symptoms

Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are characterized by diffuse spread of alpha-synuclein (α-syn) throughout the brain. Patients with PDD and DLB have a neuropsychological pattern of deficits that include executive dysfunction, such as abnormalities in planning, timing, working memory, and behavioral flexibility. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a major role in normal executive function and often develops α-syn aggregates in DLB and PDD. To investigate the consequences of α-syn pathology in the cortex, we injected human α-syn pre-formed fibrils into the PFC of wildtype mice. We report that PFC PFFs: 1) induced α-syn aggregation in multiple cortical and subcortical regions with sparse aggregation in midbrain and brainstem nuclei; 2) did not affect interval timing or spatial learning acquisition but did mildly alter behavioral flexibility as measured by intraday reversal learning; 3) increased open field exploration; and 4) did not affect susceptibility to an inflammatory challenge. This model of cortical-dominant pathology aids in our understanding of how local α-syn aggregation might impact some symptoms in PDD and DLB.

Prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychogeriatric outpatients

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome, which requires timely treatment. However, it is easily missed, especially in older patients with premorbid cognitive disorders.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of delirium in older outpatients with and without dementia.

METHOD

We assessed 444 patients referred to the memory clinic of a psychiatric hospital between March 2013 and March 2014. Demographic information, medical history, impairments in daily living activities and referral information were registered. Patients underwent a psychiatric examination using the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 and cognitive tests, a physical examination and laboratory tests. We recorded medication use and changes before and after the onset of symptoms.

RESULTS

Among the 444 outpatients, 85 had probable delirium (prevalence of 19%), and 10 had subsyndromal delirium (2%). The most common triggers were infection (42%), drug-intoxication or withdrawal (22%), and metabolic/endocrine disturbance (12%). Age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.11) and prior delirium (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.28-8.69) were independent non-modifiable factors associated with an increased risk of delirium. The only independent modifiable risk factor was infection (OR 17.31, 95% CI 8.44-35.49).

CONCLUSIONS

A delirium was detected in one of five patients referred for dementia screening. Most patients could be treated at home. Age and prior delirium were predictive of an increased risk of delirium.