1
|
Trofimova E, Asgharzadeh Kangachar S, Weynberg KD, Willows RD, Jaschke PR. A bacterial genome assembly and annotation laboratory using a virtual machine. BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION : A BIMONTHLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 51:276-285. [PMID: 36866633 PMCID: PMC10947226 DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
With the global increase of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, there is an urgent need for new methods of tackling the issue. Genomic analysis of bacterial strains can help to understand their virulence and antibiotic resistance profile. Bioinformatic skills are in great demand across the biological sciences. We designed a workshop that allows university students to learn the process of genome assembly using command-line tools within a virtual machine on a Linux operating system. We use Illumina and Nanopore short and long-read raw sequences to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of short, long, and hybrid assembly methods. The workshop teaches how to assess read and assembly quality, perform genome annotation, and analyze pathogenicity, antibiotic and phage resistance. The workshop is intended for a five-week teaching period and is concluded by a student poster presentation assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellina Trofimova
- School of Natural SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic BiologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
| | - Shahla Asgharzadeh Kangachar
- Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular BiosciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Karen D. Weynberg
- Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular BiosciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Robert D. Willows
- School of Natural SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Paul R. Jaschke
- School of Natural SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic BiologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Claesen Z, Crombag N, Henneman L, Vermeesch JR, Borry P. Expanded Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) : Can the Child's Right to an Open Future Help Set the Scope? JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:41-49. [PMID: 36630060 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has provoked ethical concerns about its justifiable scope. In this paper, we evaluate the role of the child's right to an open future in setting the scope of NIPT. This 'open future principle' has been cited in arguments both limiting and expanding parental freedoms. This moral right holds that adult autonomy rights which children cannot yet exercise should nonetheless be protected until they can. Its purpose is to protect the future autonomy of the child as a future adult. Several authors have extended this rationale from child to fetus. However, the right was not anticipated to apply to the fetus, a non-legal entity in many jurisdictions. The aim of this paper is to reconsider whether this principle is useful to help deliberate the scope of NIPT. We find that extending the open future principle to delineate the scope of NIPT is theoretically flawed. We contend that in the prenatal context its value primarily lies with counselling for prenatal screening where it can be used to encourage parents' reflection on the implications of knowing for the sake of knowing on their future children and their relationship with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Claesen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3 (box 7001), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49 (box 611), ON, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, University Hospitals Leuven, ON I Herestraat 49 (box 606), 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3 (box 7001), 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haidar H, Birko S, Laberge AM, Le Clerc-Blain J, Ravitsky V. Views of Canadian healthcare professionals on the future uses of non-invasive prenatal testing: a mixed method study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1269-1275. [PMID: 35902698 PMCID: PMC9626560 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01151-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing's (NIPT) potential to screen for a wide range of conditions is receiving growing attention. This study explores Canadian healthcare professionals' perceptions towards NIPT's current and possible future uses, including paternity testing, sex determination, and fetal whole genome sequencing. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten healthcare professionals, and another 184 participated in a survey. The triangulation of our findings shows that there is considerable agreement among healthcare professionals on expanding NIPT use for medical conditions including fetal aneuploidies and monogenic diseases, but not for non-medical conditions (sex determination for non-medical reasons and paternity testing), nor for risk predisposition information (late onset diseases and Fetal Whole Genome Sequencing). Healthcare professionals raise concerns related to eugenics, the future child's privacy, and psychological and emotional burdens to prospective parents. Professional societies need to take these concerns into account when educating healthcare professionals on the uses of NIPT to ensure prospective parents' reproductive decisions are optimal for them and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazar Haidar
- Ethics programs, Department of Letters and Humanities, University of Quebec at Rimouski (UQAR), Rimouski, QC, Canada.
| | - Stanislav Birko
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P.6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P.6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jessica Le Clerc-Blain
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P.6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Michie M, Allyse MA. What Really Matters Now in Prenatal Genetics. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:31-33. [PMID: 35089842 PMCID: PMC9113030 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2013990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
|
5
|
Bayefsky MJ, Berkman BE. Implementing Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Should Parents Have Access to Any and All Fetal Genetic Information? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:4-22. [PMID: 33459580 PMCID: PMC10066540 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1867933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal genetic testing is becoming available for an increasingly broad set of diseases, and it is only a matter of time before parents can choose to test for hundreds, if not thousands, of genetic conditions in their fetuses. Should access to certain kinds of fetal genetic information be limited, and if so, on what basis? We evaluate a range of considerations including reproductive autonomy, parental rights, disability rights, and the rights and interests of the fetus as a potential future child. We conclude that parents should be able to access information that could be useful during pregnancy, but that testing for non-medical information should be limited. Next, we argue that the government lacks a compelling state interest in regulating prenatal genetic testing and propose that regulation should occur through medical professional organizations. Finally, we present a framework for determining what testing physicians should recommend, offer neutrally, or not offer at all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J. Bayefsky
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin E. Berkman
- National Institutes of Health, Department of Bioethics, Bethesda, MD, USA
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haidar H, Iskander R. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Whole Genome Sequencing: An Interpretive Critical Review of the Ethical, Legal, Social, and Policy Implications. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2022. [DOI: 10.7202/1087199ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
7
|
Haidar H, Le Clerc-Blain J, Vanstone M, Laberge AM, Bibeau G, Ghulmiyyah L, Ravitsky V. A qualitative study of women and partners from Lebanon and Quebec regarding an expanded scope of noninvasive prenatal testing. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:54. [PMID: 33441113 PMCID: PMC7805222 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03538-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the near future, developments in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) may offer couples the opportunity to expand the range of genetic conditions tested with this technology. This possibility raises a host of ethical and social concerns, such as the type of information (medical vs. non-medical information) that couples might be exposed to and how this might complicate their informed decision-making. Currently, only limited research, mainly carried out in western countries, was conducted on women’s and partners’ views regarding the potential expansion of NIPT. Methods This study used semi-structured interviews with pregnant women and their partners to explore their views on future potential NIPT applications such as non-medical sex selection and non-medical traits, paternity testing, and NIPT use for fetal whole genome sequencing (FWGS). It was conducted in Lebanon and Quebec, as case studies to explore the impact of cultural differences on these views. Results We found no differences and many similarities when comparing the perceptions of participants in both contexts. While couples in both settings disapproved of the use of NIPT for non-medical sex selection and non-medical traits such as physical characteristics, they were near-unanimous about their support for its use for paternity testing in specific cases, such as legal doubts or conflicts related to the identity of the father. Participants were more ambivalent about NIPT for Fetal Whole Genome Sequencing. They supported this use to detect conditions that would express at birth or early childhood, while objecting to testing for adult-onset conditions. Conclusions These results can further inform the debate on the future uses of NIPT and future policy related its implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03538-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Jessica Le Clerc-Blain
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gilles Bibeau
- Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Labib Ghulmiyyah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ngan OMY, Yi H, Bryant L, Sahota DS, Chan OYM, Ahmed S. Parental expectations of raising a child with disability in decision-making for prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy: A mixed methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2373-2383. [PMID: 32507714 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine attitudes toward prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy (TOP) among parents and obstetric providers in relation to their views on raising a child with disability. METHODS An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. A survey among 274 parents and 141 providers was followed by interviews with 26 parents and 10 providers. Using multivariate analysis, the relationships between attitudes were examined. Thematic analysis was used to identify the reasons behind the attitudes. RESULTS In comparison with providers, parents reported more positive attitudes toward raising a child with disability and more moral views about TOP. Providers reported more variations in attitudes toward offering prenatal testing and TOP. Significant associations were found between attitudes toward prenatal testing, raising a child with disability, reproductive autonomy, and TOP. Three major themes were identified: (1) meanings of parenthood from genetic tests; (2) views toward TOP and parental responsibility; and (3) implications of advanced extended prenatal genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS Perceived social-cultural norms of disabilities and parental expectations of raising a child with disability influence decision-making regarding TOP. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS As more conditions of the fetus are able to be detected, the social-cultural implications of the technology and disabilities need to be addressed in antenatal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Miu Yung Ngan
- CUHK Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Huso Yi
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
| | - Louise Bryant
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Daljit Singh Sahota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Olivia Yiu Man Chan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Shenaz Ahmed
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess pregnant women's views and preferences on noninvasive prenatal whole genome sequencing. METHODS A survey was offered to 805 pregnant women receiving prenatal care in practices affiliated with a large, tertiary care maternity hospital. Respondents were asked to envision undergoing prenatal whole genome sequencing and discuss their preferences and reasons for receiving different categories of genomic results, organized by actionability, severity, prevalence, and age of onset. The survey also queried respondents on their preferred role for clinicians in prenatal whole genome sequencing decision-making, and on their demographics and genetic literacy. RESULTS From June to August 2017, a total of 553 respondents returned the survey (response rate=68.7%). Respondents were most likely to want information regarding serious treatable childhood-onset conditions (89.7%) and least likely to want to receive information about nonmedical traits from prenatal whole genome sequencing (40%). The most frequently cited reason for wanting medical prenatal whole genome sequencing results was "to prepare financially, medically, or psychologically for a child with special needs." In total, 10.5% of respondents wanted clear recommendations from clinicians about the categories of information that are most appropriate to test for, 44.7% wanted clear recommendations plus all options presented, 26.2% wanted all options presented and joint decision-making, and 13.2% wanted all options presented and independent decision-making. CONCLUSION Respondents generally preferred to receive all categories of genetic results pertaining to medical conditions and wanted the information to prepare. More than half of respondents wanted (at minimum) clear recommendations from clinicians when deciding which prenatal whole genome sequencing results to receive.
Collapse
|
10
|
Brew CE, Castro BA, Pan V, Hart A, Blumberg B, Wicklund C. Genetics professionals' attitudes toward prenatal exome sequencing. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:229-239. [PMID: 30888706 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) currently has limited use in the clinical setting, but research suggests that it has added diagnostic utility over karyotyping and array techniques for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses presenting with ultrasound abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of genetics professionals toward the clinical implementation of prenatal ES in order to guide development of professional guidelines. A survey was developed using themes identified in previous qualitative studies and was distributed to members of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). A total of 498 participants completed some portion of the survey. There was consensus among participants that there would be clinical utility of prenatal ES when used for diagnosis, pregnancy management, and termination decisions. The majority also agreed that prenatal ES was distinct from its current use in the pediatric and adult settings. There were many areas of contention regarding which types of results should be returned to families and whether or not the current ACMG guidelines for return of incidental findings should also apply to the prenatal setting. Overall, professional guidance is needed to address the continuing concerns surrounding prenatal ES as its utilization in this setting is expected to grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey E Brew
- Division of Genetics, Birth Defects and Metabolism, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Vivian Pan
- Kaiser Permanente Research Bank, Oakland, California
| | - Alexa Hart
- Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bruce Blumberg
- Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vora NL, Hui L. Next-generation sequencing and prenatal 'omics: advanced diagnostics and new insights into human development. Genet Med 2018; 20:791-799. [PMID: 30032162 PMCID: PMC6123255 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0087-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prenatal genetics has evolved over the last decade to include application of new 'omics technologies to improve perinatal care. The clinical utility of these technologies when applied to direct fetal specimens from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling is being explored. In this review, we provide an overview of use of prenatal exome sequencing and role in evaluation of the structurally abnormal fetus, potential applications of genome sequencing, and finally, use of transcriptomics to assess placental and fetal well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Public Health Genetics Group, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Harper JC, Aittomäki K, Borry P, Cornel MC, de Wert G, Dondorp W, Geraedts J, Gianaroli L, Ketterson K, Liebaers I, Lundin K, Mertes H, Morris M, Pennings G, Sermon K, Spits C, Soini S, van Montfoort APA, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, Macek M. Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:12-33. [PMID: 29199274 PMCID: PMC5839000 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0016-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Harper
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - K Aittomäki
- Laboratory of Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Geraedts
- Department Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L Gianaroli
- S.I.S.Me.R. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - I Liebaers
- Center for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Lundin
- Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - H Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Morris
- Synlab Genetics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Spits
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Soini
- Helsinki Biobank, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A P A van Montfoort
- IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Veiga
- Barcelona Stem Cell Bank, Centre of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
- Reproductive Medicine Service of Dexeus Woman Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J R Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Viville
- Institute of Parasitology and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, UF3472-Genetics of Infertility, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - M Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University-2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Harper JC, Aittomäki K, Borry P, Cornel MC, de Wert G, Dondorp W, Geraedts J, Gianaroli L, Ketterson K, Liebaers I, Lundin K, Mertes H, Morris M, Pennings G, Sermon K, Spits C, Soini S, van Montfoort APA, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, Macek M. Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications †‡. Hum Reprod Open 2017; 2017:hox015. [PMID: 31486804 PMCID: PMC6276693 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively-parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Harper
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - K Aittomäki
- Laboratory of Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 720, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001. B-3000, Leuven Belgium
| | - M C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, De Byeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, De Byeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Geraedts
- Department Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L Gianaroli
- S.I.S.Me.R. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - K Ketterson
- Althea Science, Inc., 3 Regent St #301, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA
| | - I Liebaers
- Centre for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Lundin
- Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 6, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - H Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - M Morris
- Synlab Genetics, chemin d'Entre-Bois 21, CH-1018, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Spits
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Soini
- Helsinki Biobank, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, PO Box 400, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A P A van Montfoort
- IVF laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Veiga
- Barcelona Stem Cell Bank, Centre of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via de l' Hospitalet 199, 08908, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Reproductive Medicine Service of Dexeus Woman Health, Gran Via Carles III, 71-75 - 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - J R Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - Box 602, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Viville
- Institute of Parasitology and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, 3 rue Koberlé, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, UF3472-Genetics of Infertility, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - M Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague CZ-15006, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Wit MC, Bunnik EM, Go ATJI, de Beaufort ID, Hofstra RMW, Steegers EAP, Galjaard RJH. Amniocentesis is still the best option for advanced genomic testing in case of fetal malformations. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37:1360-1363. [PMID: 29149523 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M C de Wit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A T J I Go
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I D de Beaufort
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M W Hofstra
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E A P Steegers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre and Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Horn R, Parker M. Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2017; 38:20-25. [PMID: 28695688 PMCID: PMC5836985 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of genomic approaches to prenatal testing such as whole genome and exome sequencing offers the potential for a better understanding of prenatal structural anomalies in the fetus and ultimately for improved patient care and more informed reproductive decision making. In addition to the scientific and clinical challenges of achieving this, the introduction of new reproductive technologies also presents a number of ethical problems. The successful and appropriate development and introduction of prenatal genomics into clinical practice require these problems to be identified, understood and carefully analysed in the development of models of good ethical practice. METHOD We conducted a critical review of the existing literature on ethical issues in prenatal genomics. RESULTS We identified and discussed five areas of particular concern: valid consent, management and feed-back of information, responsibilities of health professionals, priority setting and resources and duties towards the future child. CONCLUSION There is a need for further discussion of the issues we have outlined here, and we hope that this brief summary of ethical arguments in the literature encourages researchers, clinicians, patients and scientists to engage in further discussion of these and other important issues raised by prenatal genomics. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Horn
- The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
A Qualitative Look into Israeli Genetic Experts’ Insights Regarding Culturally Competent Genetic Counseling and Recommendations for Its Enhancement. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1254-1269. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0104-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
Screening for fetal aneuploidy in pregnant women using cell-free DNA has increased dramatically since the technology became commercially available in 2011. Since that time, numerous trials have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity to screen for common aneuploidies in high-risk populations. Studies assessing the performance of these tests in low-risk populations have also demonstrated improved detection rates compared with traditional, serum-based screening strategies. Concurrent with the increased use of this technology has been a decrease in invasive procedures (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling). As the technology becomes more widely understood, available, and utilized, challenges regarding its clinical implementation have become apparent. Some of these challenges include test failures, false-positive and false-negative results, limitations in positive predictive value in low-prevalence populations, and potential maternal health implications of abnormal results. In addition, commercial laboratories are expanding screening beyond common aneuploidies to include microdeletion screening and whole genome screening. This review article is intended to provide the practicing obstetrician with a summary of the complexities of cell-free DNA screening and the challenges of implementing it in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen SC, Wasserman DT. A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2017; 17:3-18. [PMID: 27996923 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing (NIPW) may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. To avoid these difficulties, we propose an unrestricted testing policy, under which prospective parents could obtain information on any variant of known significance after a careful informed consent process that uses an interactive decision aid to deliver a mandatory presentation on the purposes, techniques, and limitations of genomic testing, as well as optional resources for reflection and consultation. This process would encourage thoughtful, informed deliberation by prospective parents before deciding whether or how to use NIPW.
Collapse
|
21
|
Berkman BE, Bayefsky M. Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing: An Argument for Professional Self-Regulation. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2017; 17:26-28. [PMID: 27996921 PMCID: PMC6135090 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
|
22
|
Bayefsky MJ, White A, Wakim P, Hull SC, Wasserman D, Chen S, Berkman BE. Views of American OB/GYNs on the ethics of prenatal whole-genome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36:1250-1256. [PMID: 27862072 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given public demand for genetic information, the potential to perform prenatal whole-genome sequencing (PWGS) non-invasively in the future, and decreasing costs of whole-genome sequencing, it is likely that OB/GYN practice will include PWGS. The goal of this project was to explore OB/GYNs' views on the ethical issues surrounding PWGS and their preparedness for counseling patients on its use. METHODS A national survey was administered to 2500 members of American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. RESULTS A total of 1114 respondents completed the survey (response rate = 45%). OB/GYNs are most concerned with ordering non-medical fetal genetic information, are worried about increasing parental anxiety, and feel it is appropriate to be directive when counseling parents about PWGS. Furthermore, most OB/GYNs have limited knowledge of genetics, rely heavily on genetic counselors and would like more guidance regarding the clinical adoption of PWGS. CONCLUSION OB/GYNs do not completely accept or reject PWGS, but a substantial number have significant ethical and practical concerns. They are most concerned with issues that will directly affect their practices and interactions with patients, such as increasing parental anxiety and costs of care. Professional guidance would be instrumental in directing the adoption of PWGS and alleviating the ethical burden posed by PWGS on individual OB/GYNs. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J Bayefsky
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amina White
- University of North Carolina, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paul Wakim
- Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sara Chandros Hull
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David Wasserman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Chen
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Janvier A, Farlow B, Baardsnes J, Pearce R, Barrington KJ. Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: A family perspective. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40:571-577. [PMID: 27793420 DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Medium- and long-term outcomes have been collected and described among survivors of neonatal intensive care units for decades, for a number of purposes: (1) quality control within units, (2) comparisons of outcomes between NICUs, (3) clinical trials (whether an intervention improves outcomes), (4) end-of-life decision-making, (5) to better understand the effects of neonatal conditions and/or interventions on organs and/or long-term health, and finally (6) to better prepare parents for the future. However, the outcomes evaluated have been selected by investigators, based on feasibility, availability, cost, stability, and on what investigators consider to be important. Many of the routinely measured outcomes have major limitations: they may not correlate well with long-term difficulties, they may artificially divide continuous outcomes into dichotomous ones, and may have no clear relationship with quality of life and functioning of children and their families. Several investigations, such as routine term cerebral resonance imaging for preterm infants, have also not yet been shown to improve the outcome of children nor their families. In this article, the most common variables used in neonatology as well as some variables which are rarely measured but may be of equal importance for families are presented. The manner in which these outcomes are communicated to families will be examined, as well as recommendations to optimize communication with parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Janvier
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal; Division of Neonatology and centre de recherche, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada; Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Unité d'éthique clinique, unité de soins palliatifs, unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Barbara Farlow
- Parent and patient representative, patients for Patient Safety Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; The deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research, North York, Ontario Canada
| | - Jason Baardsnes
- Parent representative, Human Health Therapeutics, National Research Council, Montréal, Canada
| | - Rebecca Pearce
- Parent representative, Villa Maria High School, Montreal, Quebec'
| | - Keith J Barrington
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal; Division of Neonatology and centre de recherche, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:1093-115. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9942-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
25
|
Irrazábal G. On the emergence and consolidation of bioethics as a discipline, as seen from a sociological perspective. HISTORIA, CIENCIAS, SAUDE--MANGUINHOS 2015; 22:1121-1140. [PMID: 26625913 DOI: 10.1590/s0104-59702015000400002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2013] [Accepted: 03/01/2014] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This article examines the emergence and consolidation of bioethics as a discipline from a sociological perspective. This reconstruction helps us to understand on the one hand what is meant by bioethics and what its practices and areas of inquiry are, and on the other to identify various concepts and expert opinions about what the field of study for bioethics should be, opinions which lead in practice to different applications of the discipline in health sciences. This becomes relevant for epistemological discussions about the discipline and for consolidating a sociology of bioethics in the context of Ibero-America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Irrazábal
- Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales, Buenos Aires, Argentina,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dondorp W, de Wert G, Bombard Y, Bianchi DW, Bergmann C, Borry P, Chitty LS, Fellmann F, Forzano F, Hall A, Henneman L, Howard HC, Lucassen A, Ormond K, Peterlin B, Radojkovic D, Rogowski W, Soller M, Tibben A, Tranebjærg L, van El CG, Cornel MC. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23:1438-50. [PMID: 25782669 PMCID: PMC4613463 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital & Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diana W Bianchi
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carsten Bergmann
- Center for Human Genetics Bioscientia, Ingelheim, Germany
- Department of Medicine, University Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven University, Belgium
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCLH NHS Foundations Trusts, London, UK
| | - Florence Fellmann
- Service of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Lidewij Henneman
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Kelly Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dragica Radojkovic
- Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering (IMGGE), University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Wolf Rogowski
- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
| | - Maria Soller
- Division Clinical Genetics, University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Aad Tibben
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisbeth Tranebjærg
- Department of Audiology, Bispebjerg Hospital/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Kennedy Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, ICMM, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carla G van El
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Minear MA, Alessi S, Allyse M, Michie M, Chandrasekharan S. Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2015; 16:369-98. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie A. Minear
- Duke Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
| | - Stephanie Alessi
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Megan Allyse
- Biomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Marsha Michie
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dondorp W, Page-Christiaens G, de Wert G. Genomic futures of prenatal screening: ethical reflection. Clin Genet 2015; 89:531-8. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.12640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W.J. Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - G.C.M.L. Page-Christiaens
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Birth Centre; Utrecht University Medical Centre; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - G.M.W.R de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kalynchuk EJ, Althouse A, Parker LS, Saller DN, Rajkovic A. Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:1030-6. [PMID: 26151551 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Revised: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to survey the opinions of expectant parents regarding prenatal whole-exome sequencing. METHODS The study used a questionnaire that focused on acceptability of prenatal whole-exome sequencing to individuals who pursued first-trimester prenatal screening in a tertiary academic medical center. A total of 186 expectant individuals completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. RESULTS Eighty-three percent of the participants answered that prenatal whole-exome sequencing should be offered, 14.8% were neutral, and only 2.2% disagreed. Fifty-four percent of the participants were interested in having prenatal whole-exome sequencing for their fetus, 40.1% were neutral, and 6.6% disagreed. The majority of participants expressed a desire to know about treatable (96.2%) and non-treatable (86.3%) childhood conditions, and most said the same for treatable (76.0%) and non-treatable (74.3%) adult-onset conditions. Over half of the participants (59.7%) indicated a maximum acceptable turnaround time of 3 weeks or less for prenatal whole-exome sequencing. CONCLUSIONS The majority of respondents felt prenatal whole-exome sequencing should be offered. Moreover, the majority wanted to know prenatally about treatable and non-treatable childhood and adult conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve J Kalynchuk
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Althouse
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lisa S Parker
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Devereux N Saller
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aleksandar Rajkovic
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Schendel RV, Dondorp WJ, Timmermans DRM, van Hugte EJH, de Boer A, Pajkrt E, Lachmeijer AMA, Henneman L. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think? Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:598-604. [PMID: 25693726 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to study pregnant women's views on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome and the potential to test for a broader range of conditions. METHODS An online questionnaire available on the Dutch pregnancy fair website was completed by 381 pregnant women. RESULTS Of the women, 51% expressed interest in having NIPT, including 33% of women who had declined first-trimester screening. The majority (73%) thought that the uptake of screening would increase with NIPT. Most women agreed that testing for life-threatening (89%), severe physical (79%), or severe mental (76%) disorders should be offered. A minority (29%) felt that prenatal screening should also be offered for late-onset disorders. Most (41%) preferred to have a free choice from a list of disorders, 31% preferred a 'closed offer', and 26% preferred choosing between packages of disorders. Although most women (76%) thought that screening for a broad range of conditions would avoid much suffering, 39% feared that it would confront couples with choices, the implications of which would be difficult to grasp. CONCLUSION The results suggest that the uptake of screening will increase with NIPT. If NIPT will be offered for a broad range of conditions, it is crucial to find a way that facilitates rather than undermines well-informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eline J H van Hugte
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne de Boer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Augusta M A Lachmeijer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Michie M, Allyse M. Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2015; 6:1-4. [PMID: 26185771 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2014.993440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marsha Michie
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Megan Allyse
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rebouché R. Non-Invasive Testing, Non-Invasive Counseling. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:228-240. [PMID: 26242943 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
This article describes a new prenatal genetic test that is painless, early, and increasingly available. State legislatures have reacted by prohibiting abortion for reason of fetal sex or of fetal diagnosis and managing genetic counseling. This article explores these legislative responses and considers how physicians and genetic counselors currently communicate post-testing options. The article then examines the challenges ahead for genetic counseling, particularly in light of the troubling grip of abortion politics on conversations about prenatal diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Rebouché
- Associate Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. She received her J.D. from Harvard Law School, LL.M. from Queen's University, Belfast, and B.A. from Trinity University. She teaches family law, health care finance and regulation, and comparative family law
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Spector-Bagdady K. RECONCEPTUALIZING CONSENT FOR DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER HEALTH SERVICES. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 2015; 41:568-616. [PMID: 26863850 DOI: 10.1177/0098858815622191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The market for direct-to-consumer (DTC) health services continues to grow rapidly with former patients converting to customers for the opportunity to purchase varied diagnostic tests without the involvement of their clinician. For the first time a DTC genetic testing company is advertising health-related reports "that meet [Food and Drug Administration] standards for being clinically and scientifically valid." Ethicists and regulatory agencies alike have recognized the need for a more informed transaction in the DTC context, but how should we classify a commercial transaction for something normally protected by a duty of care? How can we assure informed agreements in an industry with terms and conditions as varied as the services performed? The doctrine of "informed consent" began as an ethical construct building on the promise of beneficence in the clinical relationship and elevating the principle of autonomy--but in the DTC context should we hold providers to legal standards of informed consent and associated medical malpractice liability, or contractual obligations where consumers would seek remedy for breach? This Article analyzes the fine balance that must be struck in an industry where companies are selling services for entertainment or non-medical purposes that possess the capacity to produce serious and disquieting medical information. It begins by reviewing current standards of consent in the clinical setting from both a legal and ethical perspective and then lays forth current standards for DTC consent using two currently controversial case studies: that of keepsake fetal ultrasound and genetic testing. DTC keepsake ultrasound and genetic testing providers attempt to de-medicalize the devices used for these procedures from their intended medical uses to non-medical uses. But while keepsake ultrasound is marketed as "intended for entertainment purposes only," it can provide medical information as an incidental finding. 23andMe currently purports to be the only DTC genetics service that "includes" reports that meet FDA qualifications, despite disclaimers of intent to "provide medical advice." The attempted de-medicalization of these devices, therefore, has not been fully transformative, and DTC providers should have more robust ethical and legal duties than the average goods and services seller. This Article delineates these responsibilities, beginning with ethical duties surrounding marketing, entering into, and providing DTC services. It then turns to the legal paradigms necessary to enable, or at least allow for, DTC providers to meet these ethical obligations. While it argues that contractual, as opposed to fiduciary, requirements are most appropriate and that waivers of liability will likely be upheld, it also advocates for a heightened expectation of disclosure during contracting.
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Klitzman
- Masters of Bioethics Program, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Founds S. Innovations in prenatal genetic testing beyond the fetal karyotype. Nurs Outlook 2014; 62:212-218. [DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 12/31/2013] [Accepted: 12/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
36
|
Klugman S, Suskin B, Spencer BL, Dar P, Bajaj K, Powers J, Reichling J, Wasserman D, Dolan SM, Merkatz IR. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 27:1333-8. [PMID: 24147763 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We studied the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis in a clinical setting in New York City. METHODS Our center began offering CMA to pregnant women undergoing invasive diagnostic procedures for an abnormal structural finding on ultrasound, maternal age of 35 years or older, or elevated risk on aneuploidy screening, beginning March 2012. Our first six months experience is reported. RESULTS Benign familial variants were the most common finding (16/22 fetuses). Variants of uncertain significance were frequent, especially when fathers were not available for testing (4/22 fetuses). Most patients undertook CMA as part of evaluation of an ultrasound anomaly (52%). One patient terminated a pregnancy based on an ultrasound finding in the setting of a benign familial variant on CMA, and a second terminated a pregnancy based on a copy number variant identified on CMA. CONCLUSION For CMA to be maximally useful in prenatal diagnosis, parental DNA samples as well as robust datasets to provide predictive phenotypic information are required. The most common reason for undertaking CMA was to evaluate an ultrasound anomaly, and benign familial variants were a common finding. Genetic services are required to provide pre- and post-test genetic counseling and help families interpret results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Klugman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health , Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Yu JH, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ. Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model. Genet Med 2013; 15:684-90. [PMID: 23619276 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Accepted: 02/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Researchers and clinicians face the practical and ethical challenge of if and how to offer for return the wide and varied scope of results available from individual exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing. We argue that rather than viewing individual exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing as a test for which results need to be "returned," that the technology should instead be framed as a dynamic resource of information from which results should be "managed" over the lifetime of an individual. We further suggest that individual exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing results management is optimized using a self-guided approach that enables individuals to self-select among results offered for return in a convenient, confidential, personalized context that is responsive to their value system. This approach respects autonomy, allows individuals to maximize potential benefits of genomic information (beneficence) and minimize potential harms (nonmaleficence), and also preserves their right to an open future to the extent they desire or think is appropriate. We describe key challenges and advantages of such a self-guided management system and offer guidance on implementation using an information systems approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Berryessa CM, Cho MK. Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013; 14:515-34. [PMID: 23452225 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The field of behavioral genetics has engendered a host of moral and social concerns virtually since its inception. The policy implications of a genetic basis for behaviors are widespread and extend beyond the clinic to the socially important realms of education, criminal justice, childbearing, and child rearing. The development of new techniques and analytic approaches, including whole-genome sequencing, noninvasive prenatal genetic testing, and optogenetics, has clearly changed the study of behavioral genetics. However, the social context of biomedical research has also changed profoundly over the past few decades, and in ways that are especially relevant to behavioral genetics. The ever-widening scope of behavioral genetics raises ethical, legal, social, and policy issues in the potential new applications to criminal justice, education, the military, and reproduction. These issues are especially critical to address because of their potentially disproportionate effects on vulnerable populations such as children, the unborn, and the incarcerated.
Collapse
|