1
|
Incorvaia AD. Death Positivity in America: The Movement-Its History and Literature. OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING 2024; 89:1233-1252. [PMID: 35466807 DOI: 10.1177/00302228221085176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Western society is in an era of death awareness, its most recent salience: A Positive Death Movement. This article traces the evolution of American death culture by describing key periods of change, starting with the 1700s and going through the 21st century, and overviews contemporary movement scholarship. Experts suggest our current epoch is one in which a diffuse collection of individuals and organizations advocate for approaching death differently. Movement proponents aim to modify society's "conventional" death framework, which is characterized as medicalized, institutionalized, impersonal, and lacking psychosocial emotional preparation and engagement.
Collapse
|
2
|
Moynihan KM, Taylor LS, Siegel B, Nassar N, Lelkes E, Morrison W. "Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Front Pediatr 2024; 11:1325207. [PMID: 38274466 PMCID: PMC10808631 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1325207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advances in medical technology have led to both clinical and philosophical challenges in defining death. Highly publicized cases have occurred when families or communities challenge a determination of death by the irreversible cessation of neurologic function (brain death). Parallels can be drawn in cases where an irreversible cessation of cardiopulmonary function exists, in which cases patients are supported by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Analysis Two cases and an ethical analysis are presented which compare and contrast contested neurologic determinations of death and refusal to accept the irreversibility of an imminent death by cardiopulmonary standards. Ambiguities in the Uniform Determination of Death Act are highlighted, as it can be clear, when supported by ECMO, that a patient could have suffered the irreversible cessation of cardiopulmonary function yet still be alive (e.g., responsive and interactive). Parallel challenges with communication with families around the limits of medical technology are discussed. Discussion Cases that lead to conflict around the removal of technology considered not clinically beneficial are likely to increase. Reframing our goals when death is inevitable is important for both families and the medical team. Building relationships and trust between all parties will help families and teams navigate these situations. All parties may require support for moral distress. Suggested approaches are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie M. Moynihan
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa S. Taylor
- Office of Ethics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bryan Siegel
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Natasha Nassar
- Clinical and Population Translational Health, Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Efrat Lelkes
- Department of Pediatrics, MaineGeneral Medical Center, Augusta, ME, United States
| | - Wynne Morrison
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Divisions of Critical Care and Palliative Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Molina-Pérez A, Bernat JL, Dalle Ave A. Inconsistency between the Circulatory and the Brain Criteria of Death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2023; 48:422-433. [PMID: 37364165 PMCID: PMC10501178 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhad029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) provides that "an individual who has sustained either (1) irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions or (2) irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem, is dead." We show that the UDDA contains two conflicting interpretations of the phrase "cessation of functions." By one interpretation, what matters for the determination of death is the cessation of spontaneous functions only, regardless of their generation by artificial means. By the other, what matters is the cessation of both spontaneous and artificially supported functions. Because each UDDA criterion uses a different interpretation, the law is conceptually inconsistent. A single consistent interpretation would lead to the conclusion that conscious individuals whose respiratory and circulatory functions are artificially supported are actually dead, or that individuals whose brain is entirely and irreversibly destroyed may be alive. We explore solutions to mitigate the inconsistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James L Bernat
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Anne Dalle Ave
- The Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
DeCamp M, Prager K. Standards and Ethics Issues in the Determination of Death: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1245-1250. [PMID: 37665984 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The determination of a patient's death is of considerable medical and ethical significance. Death is a biological concept with social implications. Acting with honesty, transparency, respect, and integrity is critical to trust in the patient-physician relationship, and the profession, in life and in death. Over time, cases about the determination of death have raised questions that need to be addressed. This American College of Physicians position paper addresses current controversies and supports a clarification to the Uniform Determination of Death Act; maintaining the 2 current independent standards of determining death, cardiorespiratory and neurologic; retaining the whole brain death standard; aligning medical testing with the standards; keeping issues about the determination of death separate from organ transplantation; reaffirming the importance and role of the dead donor rule; and engaging in educational efforts for health professionals, patients, and the public on these issues. Physicians should advocate for policies and practices on the determination of death that are consistent with the profession's fundamental and timeless commitment to individual patients and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew DeCamp
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado (M.D.)
| | - Kenneth Prager
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York (K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Folkerth RD, Crary JF, Shewmon DA. Neuropathologic findings in a young woman 4 years following declaration of brain death: case analysis and literature review. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2022; 82:6-20. [PMID: 36519406 PMCID: PMC9764081 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlac090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain death (death by neurologic criteria) is declared in 2% of all in-hospital deaths in the United States. Published neuropathology studies of individuals maintained on cardiorespiratory support are generally decades old, and notably include only 3 cases with long intervals between brain and "somatic" death (68 days, 101 days, 20 years). Here, we share our observations in a young woman supported for nearly 4½ years following declaration of brain death after oropharyngeal surgery. While limited by tissue availability and condition, we found evidence of at least partial perfusion of the superficial cerebral and cerebellar cortices by external carotid and vertebral arteries (via meningeal and posterior pharyngeal branches), characterized by focal cellular reaction and organization. Dural venous sinuses had thrombosis and recanalization, as well as iron deposition. In nonperfused brain areas, tissue "mummification," akin to that seen in certain postmortem conditions, including macerated stillbirths and saponification (adipocere formation), was identified, and are reviewed herein. Unfortunately, correlation with years-earlier clinical and radiographic observations was not possible. Nevertheless, we feel that our careful neuropathologic inspection of this case expands the understanding of the spectrum of human brain tissue alterations possible in a very rarely seen set of conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca D Folkerth
- New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner and New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 520 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; E-mail: ; ;
| | - John F Crary
- From the New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, New York, USA (RDF); Departments of Pathology, Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Ronald M. Loeb Center for Alzheimer's Disease, Neuropathology Brain Bank & Research Core, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA (JFC); and Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA (DAS)
| | - D Alan Shewmon
- From the New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, New York, USA (RDF); Departments of Pathology, Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Ronald M. Loeb Center for Alzheimer's Disease, Neuropathology Brain Bank & Research Core, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA (JFC); and Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA (DAS)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edlow BL, Kinney HC. Defining the boundary between life and death: New insights from neuropathology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2022; 82:3-5. [PMID: 36519398 PMCID: PMC9764079 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Edlow
- Send correspondence to: Brian L. Edlow, MD, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac Street—Suite 310, Boston, MA 02114, USA; E-mail:
| | - Hannah C Kinney
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butler CR. Understanding Public Perspectives on Opt-Out Deceased Donor Transplant Policy: Ethically Obligatory and Practically Necessary. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1577-1579. [PMID: 36288932 PMCID: PMC9718040 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11230922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine and Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bjelland S, Jones K. A Systematic Review on Improving the Family Experience After Consent for Deceased Organ Donation. Prog Transplant 2022; 32:152-166. [DOI: 10.1177/15269248221087429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The demand for transplanted organs outweighs the supply and intensifies the need to improve care for donor families. Studies have shown inadequate care by hospital staff can increase posttraumatic stress disorder and complicated grief in these families but putting solutions into practice remains slow. Objective This systematic review identified factors that relieve or contribute to distress for deceased organ donor families in the time since the decision to donate. Additionally, it provides insights into potential improvements at public health, educational, and health system levels to address these deficiencies. Methods Search terms included organ don*, famil* or relati*, family-centered, grief, and experience*. The search covered original research articles, published in English, from 2014 to July 2021. Results Four key themes emerged among the studies. (a) Understanding factors that affect the emotional aftermath can help staff prevent posttraumatic stress disorder and complicated grief. (b) Improving communication by hospital staff includes: avoiding medical jargon, providing adequate audio and visual explanations, and understanding that the next of kin is struggling to comprehend the tragedy and the information they are being told. (c) End-of-life care such as memory making, bringing in palliative care resources, and parting ceremonies can assist with familial coping as well as staff interactions. (d) Families want more support in the months and years after the donation decision. Discussion Changes at multiple levels can improve the quality of care for families whose relative gave the gift of life, but more research and translation into practice are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Bjelland
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Krista Jones
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Urbana, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Healthcare Professionals’ Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1309. [PMID: 35372677 PMCID: PMC8963853 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. During the 1950s, advances in critical care, and organ transplantation altered the relationship between organ failure and death. There has since been a shift away from traditional cardiocirculatory based to brain-based criteria of death, with resulting academic controversy, despite the practice being largely accepted worldwide. Our objective is to develop a comprehensive description of the current understandings of healthcare professionals regarding the meaning, definition, and determination of death. Methods. Online databases were used to identify papers published from 2003 to 2020. Additional sources were searched for conference proceedings and theses. Two reviewers screened papers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Complementary searches and review of reference lists complemented the final study selection. A data extraction instrument was developed to iteratively chart the results of the review. A qualitative approach was conducted to thematically analyze the data. Results. Seven thousand four hundred twenty-eight references were identified. In total, 75 papers met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen additional papers were added from complementary searches. Most were narratives (35%), quantitative investigations (21%), and reviews (18%). Identified themes included: (1) the historical evolution of brain death (BD), (2) persistent controversies about BD and death determination, (3) wide variability in healthcare professionals’ knowledge and attitudes, (4) critical need for BD determination revision. Conclusions. We concluded that although BD is widely accepted, there exists variation in healthcare providers’ understanding of its conceptual basis. Death determination remains a divisive issue among scholars. This review identified a need for increased opportunities for formal training on BD among healthcare providers.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fainberg N, Mataya L, Kirschen M, Morrison W. Pediatric brain death certification: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr 2021; 10:2738-2748. [PMID: 34765497 PMCID: PMC8578760 DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In the five decades since its inception, brain death has become an accepted medical and legal concept throughout most of the world. There was initial reluctance to apply brain death criteria to children as they are believed more likely to regain neurologic function following injury. In spite of early trepidation, criteria for pediatric brain death certification were first proposed in 1987 by a multidisciplinary committee comprised of experts in the medical and legal communities. Protocols have since been developed to standardize brain death determination, but there remains substantial variability in practice throughout the world. In addition, brain death remains a topic of considerable ethical, philosophical, and legal controversy, and is often misrepresented in the media. In the present article, we discuss the history of brain death and the guidelines for its determination. We provide an overview of past and present challenges to its concept and diagnosis from biophilosophical, ethical and legal perspectives, and highlight differences between adult and pediatric brain death determination. We conclude by anticipating future directions for brain death as related to the emergence of new technologies. It is our position that providers should endorse the criteria for brain death diagnosis in children as proposed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and Child Neurology Society (CNS), in order to prevent controversy and subjectivity surrounding what constitutes life versus death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Fainberg
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leslie Mataya
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Kirschen
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wynne Morrison
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deceased Organ Transplantation in Bangladesh: The Dynamics of Bioethics, Religion and Culture. HEC Forum 2021; 34:139-167. [PMID: 33595774 PMCID: PMC7887719 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-020-09436-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Organ transplantation from living related donors in Bangladesh first began in October 1982, and became commonplace in 1988. Cornea transplantation from posthumous donors began in 1984 and living related liver and bone marrow donor transplantation began in 2010 and 2014 respectively. The Human Organ Transplantation Act officially came into effect in Bangladesh on 13th April 1999, allowing organ donation from both brain-dead and related living donors for transplantation. Before the legislation, religious leaders issued fatwa, or religious rulings, in favor of organ transplantation. The Act was amended by the Parliament on 8th January, 2018 with the changes coming into effect shortly afterwards on 28th January. However, aside from a few posthumous corneal donations, transplantation of vital organs, such as the kidney, liver, heart, pancreas, and other body parts or organs from deceased donors, has remained absent in Bangladesh. The major question addressed in this article is why the transplantation of vital organs from deceased donors is absent in Bangladesh. In addition to the collection of secondary documents, interviews were conducted with senior transplant physicians, patients and their relatives, and the public, to learn about posthumous organ donation for transplantation. Interviews were also conducted with a medical student and two grief counselors to understand the process of counseling the families and obtaining consent to obtain posthumous cornea donations from brain-dead patients. An interview was conducted with a professional anatomist to understand the processes behind body donation for the purposes of medical study and research. Their narrative reveals that transplant physicians may be reticent to declare brain death as the stipulations of the 1999 act were unclear and vague. This study finds that Bangladeshis have strong family ties and experience anxiety around permitting separating body parts of dead relatives for organ donation for transplantation, or donating the dead body for medical study and research purposes. Posthumous organ donation for transplantation is commonly viewed as a wrong deed from a religious point of view. Religious scholars who have been consulted by the government have approved posthumous organ donation for transplantation on the grounds of necessity to save lives even though violating the human body is generally forbidden in Islam. An assessment of the dynamics of biomedicine, religion and culture leads to the conclusion that barriers to posthumous organ donation for transplantation that are perceived to be religious may actually stem from cultural attitudes. The interplay of faith, belief, religion, social norms, rituals and wider cultural attitudes with biomedicine and posthumous organ donation and transplantation is very complex. Although overcoming the barriers to organ donation for transplantation is challenging, initiation of transplantation of vital organs from deceased donors is necessary within Bangladesh. This will ensure improved healthcare outcomes, prevent poor people from being coerced into selling their organs to rich recipients, and protect the solidarity and progeny of Bangladeshi families.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Unconsented intimate exams (UIEs) on men and women are known to occur for training purposes and diagnostic reasons, mostly during gynecological surgeries but also during prostate examinations and abdominal surgeries. UIEs most often occur on anesthetized patients but have also been reported on conscious patients. Over the last 30 years, several parties—both within and external to medicine—have increasingly voiced opposition to these exams. Arguments from medical associations, legal scholars, ethicists, nurses, and some physicians have not compelled meaningful institutional change. Opposition is escalating in the form of legislative bans and whistleblower reports. Aspiring to professional and scientific detachment, institutional consent policies make no distinction between intimate exams and exams on any other body part, but patients do not think of their intimate regions in a detached or neutral way and believe intimate exams call for special protections. UIEs are found to contribute to moral erosion and moral distress of medical students and compromise the sacred trust between the medical community and the general public. This paper refutes the main arguments in favor of the status quo, identifies a series of harms related to continuing the current practice, and proposes an explicit consent policy for intimate exams along with specific changes to medical school curriculum and institutional culture. Because patients are the rights-holders of their bodies, consent practices should reflect and uphold patient values which call for explicit consent for intimate exams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Bruce
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vercler CJ, Laventhal NT. Schrödinger's Cat and the Ethically Untenable Act of Not Looking. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:40-42. [PMID: 32441601 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
|
14
|
Padela AI, Auda J. The Moral Status of Organ Donation and Transplantation Within Islamic Law: The Fiqh Council of North America's Position. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e536. [PMID: 32195327 PMCID: PMC7056282 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Muslim communities tend to hold more negative attitudes toward organ donation than other communities. These views, in part, reflect the diverse views of Islamic scholars who debate the conditions under which donation and transplantation is morally licit. In December 2018, the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) weighed in on the US context of donation and transplantation through an Islamic ethico-legal verdict (fatwa). METHODS Between 2016 and 2018, FCNA members engaged in multidisciplinary research using conventions of collective Islamic moral deliberation. They examined rulings on organ donation and transplantation issued by Islamic jurists and juridical councils abroad, convened with organ donation and transplantation professionals and stakeholders including families and patients, and consulted medical and bioethics experts. RESULTS FCNA judges organ donation to be morally permissible from the perspective of Islamic law and ethics, subject to several conditions. These include first-person authorization, that donation occur either while living or after circulatory declaration of death, harm to the donor is minimized, reproductive organs are not donated, among others. Organ transplantation, in general, was also deemed licit. CONCLUSIONS FCNA's verdict uniquely addresses American contexts and has several clinical practice implications. By sharing their perspective with academic and professional stakeholders, the council aims to provide nuanced guidance for assisting Muslims in making informed choices regarding these procedures and further societal dialogue on the ethics and practices of donation and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasim I. Padela
- Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Initiative on Islam and Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Fiqh Council of North America, Plainfield, IL
| | - Jasser Auda
- Fiqh Council of North America, Plainfield, IL
- Maqasid Institute Global, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leemputte M, Paquette E. Consent for Conducting Evaluations to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria: a Legally Permissible and Ethically Required Approach to Addressing Current Controversies. CURRENT PEDIATRICS REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40124-019-00204-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|