Preoperative risk assessment for gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients

The Effect of Nasogastric Feeding after Surgery in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers - Retrospective Single Center Experience

This study aimed to assess clinical factors that could predict the need for nasogastric feeding after surgery in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and evaluate the effect of tube feeding on selected laboratory parameters.This single-center retrospective study included 153 patients who underwent surgery for HNC. Data on patient and tumor characteristics were collected, along with laboratory measurements. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of the need for nasogastric feeding. Laboratory parameters were compared between patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not.Nasogastric feeding was required in 90 patients (59%). Significant predictors of nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery, which were revealed by univariate regression analysis, included low body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84), squamous cell carcinoma histology (OR = 8.05), T2 tumor stage (OR = 2.27), red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.44), hemoglobin levels (g/dL) (OR = 0.80), and mean corpuscular volume (fL) (OR = 1.10). Multivariate analysis showed that low BMI (OR = 0.87) and red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.32) were prognostic factors for nasogastric feeding. A significant percentage increase in white blood cell count from admission to discharge was noted in patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not (p = 0.003).Determining factors that predict the need for nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery may support more personalized treatment planning to optimize clinical outcomes.

Risk Factors for Feeding Tube Dependency in Patients Undergoing Function Preservation Surgery for Advanced-Stage Laryngohypopharyngeal Cancer

Dysphagia and feeding tube dependency commonly occur in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer (LHC) during and after treatment, often leading to poor functional outcomes. Therefore, we examined the factors related to feeding tube dependency among advanced-stage LHC patients undergoing curative surgery. This study included 69 consecutive patients who underwent conservative surgery for previously untreated, advanced-stage LHC (squamous cell carcinoma) between 2006 and 2016. Persistent feeding tube dependency was defined as 1 year or more after treatment completion. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with reactive prolonged and persistent feeding tube dependency. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to determine the association between feeding tube dependency and survival. None of the study patients had a prophylactic feeding tube, but 15 (21.7%) patients had reactive feeding tube placement for 3 months or more. A total of 9 (13.0%) patients had persistent feeding tube dependency. Univariate analysis showed that age, tracheostomy, and common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) ≥ 3 were significantly associated with reactive prolonged and persistent feeding tube dependency (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, advanced age and CTCAE ≥ 3 remained the independent factors of reactive prolonged and persistent feeding tube dependency (all P < 0.05). Feeding tube dependency was not associated with overall survival or disease-free survival (P > 0.1). Feeding tube dependency might be related to clinical factors, such as age and severe adverse events, in the patients undergoing function-preserving surgery for advanced-stage LHC.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous gastrostomy: initial experience at a cancer center

Gastrostomy is indicated for patients with conditions that do not allow adequate oral nutrition. To reduce the morbidity and costs associated with the procedure, there is a trend toward the use of percutaneous gastrostomy, guided by endoscopy, fluoroscopy, or, most recently, computed tomography. The purpose of this paper was to review the computed tomography-guided gastrostomy procedure, as well as the indications for its use and the potential complications.

Development of Late Toxicities in Patients with Oral Tongue Cancer Treated with Surgical Resection and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

Objectives

The late effects of RT are not well reported in patients with oral tongue cancer (OTC). This study reports the incidence of late effects and factors associated with the development of late effects in OTC patients.

Methods

Patients with OTC treated in our institution from 2003 to 2013 were evaluated. The association between RT doses, including mandible maximum and minimum doses and total 3D maximum dose, and late toxicity, defined as development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence for >6 months after treatment, and narcotic dependency >6 months posttreatment were assessed using both univariate and multivariable (MV) analysis.

Results

Seventy-six patients with OTC (45% males and 55% females) were treated with definitive surgical resection followed by adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Combined late toxicities were reported in 38% of patients. Thirty-four percent of the patients had narcotic dependency and, 3.9% of the patients had ORN of the mandible. Thirteen percent of patients developed PEG tube dependency that was significantly associated with a higher 3D maximum radiation dose on univariate analysis (p < 0.01). On MV analysis, 3D maximum dose remained significantly associated with long-term PEG tube dependency (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with OTC treated with adjuvant RT are at significant risk for development of late toxicities. Increasing maximum dose is associated with long-term PEG tube dependence, and care should be taken to reduce the “hot spot” within radiation treatment plans as much as possible.

Influence of dosimetric and clinical criteria on the requirement of artificial nutrition during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Intensification of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) may lead to increased rates of long term dysphagia as a severe side effect. Mucositis and consequent swallowing problems require artificial nutrition in many HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiation. It is unknown, which predict factors for prophylactic PEG tube insertion appear useful.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From an institutional database, 101 patients (72 male, 29 female, mean age 59.5years) were identified who underwent radiotherapy or chemoradiation for HNC. Primary end point of the investigation was the need for artificial nutrition for more than 4days during radiotherapy. Dose volume parameters of defined normal tissue structures potentially of relevance for swallowing ability as well as clinical factors were used to develop a predictive model using a binary multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Whereas several dosimetric and clinical factors were significant predictors for the need of artificial nutrition on univariate analysis, on multivariate analysis only three factors remained independently significant: mean dose to the oropharynx+1cm circumferential margin, ECOG performance state (0-1 vs. 2-4), and the use of chemotherapy (yes vs. no).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a 3 parameter model we could distinguish HNC-patients with different risks for the need of artificial nutrition during radiotherapy. After independent validation, the model could be helpful to decision on prophylactic PEG tube insertion.

Gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: current literature, controversies and research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article explores the literature on the role of gastrostomy tube feeding use in the management of head and neck cancer, with special attention to its indications, timing of insertion, advantages, complications and quality of life issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current guidelines in place across different countries and two ongoing randomized controlled trials are discussed in detail, and placed in the context of current evidence.

SUMMARY

There remains a lack of consensus about when and which enteral feeding routes (gastrostomy or nasogastric tube) should be used and controversy about the long-term effects on swallowing function as well as quality of life for patients. Local guidelines should be used or generated to guide practice or patients enrolled into existing trials until higher level evidence is generated.

Predictive Factors for Preoperative Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement: Novel Screening Tools for Head and Neck Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of head and neck cancer has varying impact on postoperative recovery and return of swallowing function. The authors aim to establish screening tools to assist in preoperatively determining the need for gastrostomy tube placement.

METHODS

The authors prospectively assessed all patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstructive surgery during a 1-year study period. Only patients tolerating an oral diet, without preoperative gastrostomies, were enrolled for study. Eight parameters were assessed including: body mass index (BMI), prealbumin, albumin, smoking history, comorbidities [including coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes mellitus (DM)], age, use of microvascular reconstruction, and type of defect. Two specific screening tools were assessed. In the first, a multivariate logistic regression model was employed to determine factor(s) that predict postoperative gastrostomy tube. In a second screening tool, the 8 parameters were scored between 0 to 1 points. The total score obtained for each patient was correlated with postoperative gastrostomy placement.

RESULTS

Out of the 60 study patients enrolled in the study, 24 patients (40%) received a postoperative gastrostomy. In the logistic regression model, albumin level was the only factor that was significantly associated with need for postoperative gastrostomy (P < 0.0023). A score of 4 or greater was determined to have a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 61% for postoperative gastrostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a score of 4 or more with this screening scoring system or those patients with an albumin level <3.5 g/dL were at high risk for postoperative feeding tube placement.

Factors affecting duration of gastrostomy tube retention in survivors following treatment for head and neck cancer

Background:

Many patients treated for head and neck cancer require nutritional support, which is often delivered using a gastrostomy tube. It is difficult to predict which patients will retain their gastrostomy tube in the long term. This study aimed to identify the factors which affect the duration of gastrostomy tube retention.

Method:

In this retrospective study, 151 consecutive patients from one centre were audited. All patients had a mucosal tumour of the head and neck, and underwent gastrostomy tube insertion between 2003 and 2007.

Results:

There were near-complete data sets for 132 patients. The gastrostomy tube was retained in survivors (n = 66) for a mean of 21.3 months and in non-survivors (n = 66) for 11.9 months. Univariate analysis showed that co-morbidity was the only factor which significantly increased duration of gastrostomy tube retention in survivors (p = 0.041).

Conclusion:

Co-morbidity alone was associated with a significant increase in gastrostomy tube retention. It is suggested that co-morbidity be included as a variable in future relevant research. Co-morbidity should also be considered when counselling patients about their long-term function following cancer treatment. Gastrostomy tube retention is likely to be affected by many factors, with few single variables having importance independently.

When is the optimal time for placing a gastrostomy in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Determining the optimal timing for placing a gastrostomy in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer involves complex decision making and multifactorial analysis. Lack of high-quality studies with appropriate end points for nutritional outcomes and heterogeneity of patient, clinical and organizational factors makes determining best practice nutritional care challenging. This review provides a background rationale for gastrostomy placement and evaluates the relevant literature extending beyond the past 12 months due to limited numbers of published studies. Emerging concepts and controversies are highlighted to demonstrate that the decision to place a gastrostomy or not has eclipsed the significance of patients' nutritional needs leading to much debate and inconsistencies in clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

While the optimal method of tube feeding remains unclear due to challenges with study design, improved outcomes have been demonstrated with prophylactic tube feeding. Variation exists with selection criteria in the decision for gastrostomy placement based on clinical opinion rather than evidence-based practice. Gastrostomy use as a measure of swallowing outcomes and the presence of a feeding tube for quality of life (QOL) have led to the concept of gastrostomy dependency and a perceived association with poorer outcomes. The multidimensional contributors have been inadequately explored leaving this phenomenon poorly defined and misinterpreted. Best practice nutritional care incorporates malnutrition screening and nutritional assessment using validated tools, early referral to the dietitian and ongoing monitoring to optimize nutritional status throughout the patient's entire care pathway.

SUMMARY

The decision for timing of gastrostomy placement should be made at diagnosis given the benefits of prophylactic tube feeding. Accountability for insertion and removal of gastrostomies with alignment of services will facilitate risk assessment, appropriate placement, effective patient counselling and monitoring for major and minor complications. Nutritional outcomes need to be distinguished from swallowing and QOL measures and evaluated to include effects on nutritional status, gastrostomy complications, intensity and frequency of dietetic support and effect on survival.

Increased likelihood of long-term gastrostomy tube dependence in head and neck cancer survivors without partners

BACKGROUND

We evaluated factors associated with long-term dependence on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four patients receiving treatment at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2002 and 2004 who underwent PEG tube placement were identified through retrospective review of medical records. Using binary logistic regression, we evaluated the association of various factors on long-term dependence on PEG tubes.

RESULTS

A total of 25.3% of survivors remained PEG tube-dependent at 12 months. The odds of long-term PEG tube-dependence were greater for those who did not have partners compared with those who had partners (odds ratio [OR], 3.33; p = .004), for patients who received radiation therapy (OR, 6.21; p = .018), and for those who had a tracheotomy in place for longer than 30 days (OR, 4.328; p = .035).

CONCLUSION

Data suggest that interventions targeted at reducing long-term dependence on PEG tubes take into account not only treatment-related factors, but also the important role that social support plays.

Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence-based medicine

BACKGROUND

Patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) are at increased risk of experiencing malnutrition, which is associated with poor outcomes. Advances in the treatment of HNCs have resulted in improved outcomes that are associated with severe toxic oral side effects, placing patients at an even greater risk of malnutrition. Prophylactic placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes before treatment may be beneficial in patients with HNC, especially those undergoing more intense treatment regimens. PEG tube placement, however, is not without risks.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted.

RESULTS

Systematic evidence assessing both the benefits and harm associated with prophylactic PEG tube placement in patients undergoing treatment for HNC is weak, and benefits and harm have not been established.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is necessary to inform physician behavior on whether prophylactic PEG tube placement is warranted in the treatment of HNC.

Use of gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: a systematic review to identify areas for future research

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of studies, which investigate the role of gastrostomy tube feeding in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the English literature, identifying areas of clinical equipoise and recommendations for future studies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Varying practices in G-tube use in HNSCC, the benefits and disadvantages of G-tubes, the effect of G-tube placement on multidimensional outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer, including quality of life and health economics and to draw themes that may lend themselves to future research.

RESULTS

The search identified 216 articles of which 59 were considered relevant. During treatment, a significant number of patients need enteral nutritional supplementation through nasogastric or G-tubes. Gastrostomy tubes have a good safety profile. Most clinicians agree that the use should be restricted to advanced tumours. Studies on prophylactic insertion of G-tubes do not show a consistent advantage to the nutritional status compared with NG tubes. At 1 year, G-tube retention rates vary between 10% and 30%. The presence of a feeding tube has a negative impact on quality of life. Placing G-tubes may have an adverse effect on swallowing after chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of consensus among clinicians about indications for placing G-tubes. There is sufficient equipoise in this area for further investigation of the effect of varying feeding practices on functional outcomes, quality of life and health economics.

Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for patients receiving radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: a retrospective review

Patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers often experience significant complications. We sought to evaluate the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes (PGTs) among these patients on four easily evaluable adverse outcomes, namely, absolute weight loss, percentage weight loss, admissions for nutritional reasons and treatment interruptions. A retrospective review was carried out on patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for primary head and neck cancers from September 1999 to October 2005 at the Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre (n = 71). PGTs were placed in 7 (10%) patients. Patients with PGTs were compared with the patients without PGTs (the control group) by univariate and multivariate analyses. By univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in absolute or percentage weight loss between those with PGTs and the control group. By multivariate analysis, those with PGTs lost 5.2% (P = 0.016) less weight than the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to admissions for nutritional reasons or treatment interruptions. The use of PGTs can reduce weight loss in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers, and its use should be further evaluated in future studies.

Percutaneous feeding tubes in patients with head and neck cancer: rethinking prophylactic placement for patients undergoing chemoradiation

OBJECTIVES

Although intensified therapy has contributed to improved outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer, acute toxicity has increased as well. To lessen the severity of nutritional compromise in these patients, our institutional protocol has been to routinely place feeding tubes before the initiation of therapy. This investigation details the toxicities associated with feeding tube placement and predictors for duration of tube dependence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of the Radiation Oncology Department at Emory Clinic were reviewed for patients receiving definitive radiotherapy between 6/1/2003 and 6/1/2006. The records of the subset of patients with feeding tube placement before the initiation of therapy were then reviewed for toxicities as well as length of time of tube dependence.

RESULTS

There were 102 eligible patients. Radiotherapy was delivered with concomitant chemotherapy in all. Median time with feeding tube in place for all patients was 4.4 months (range, 0.2-28.9 months). For 82 patients with eventual tube removal, the median time of tube dependence was 3.8 months (range, 1.4-28.9 months). Risk factors for prolonged tube dependence are analyzed; on multivariate analysis, patient age, T stage, and nodal status remained significant. The most common complication was tube replacement, with 11.8% of all tubes requiring replacement. Infection and pain occurred in 8.8% and 5.9% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Feeding tubes are required for more than 2 months after combined modality treatment of head and neck cancer. They are generally well tolerated, but toxicities are not trivial: more than 10% require replacement and more than 8% of patients develop infection at the insertion site. We are assessing their routine placement in light of these data.

Recovery from Postsurgical Swallowing Dysfunction in Patients With Oral Cancer

PURPOSE

The present study was focused on a comparison of postsurgical oropharyngeal swallowing efficiency and medical status indicators.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The swallowing function was assessed in 25 patients (18 males and 7 females) with oral cancer. The swallowing function was assessed preoperatively and 1, 6, and 12 months and in some cases more than 24 months after surgery. Assessment of the swallowing function consisted of videofluoroscopic evaluation (oropharyngeal swallow efficiency; OPSE) and details of the method of nutrition, diet level, nutritional condition, and occurrence of pneumonia.

RESULTS

Postsurgically, OPSE did not recover to the preoperative level more than 12 months after surgery. Twenty-one patients (84%) had full oral intake and only 3 patients (12%) showed poorer nutritional conditions compared with the presurgery state. Aspiration pneumonia did not occur more than 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients in the present study showed stable medical status and functional swallowing at the final evaluation despite insufficient recovery of OPSE revealed by videofluoroscopic evaluation.

Evaluating predictive factors for determining enteral nutrition in patients receiving radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To identify objective pre-treatment clinical parameters that could be used to predict for patients at high risk of requiring enteral tube feeding prior to head and neck radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 160 consecutive patients attending for radiotherapy assessment. Regression analysis was used to determine various pre-treatment nutritional and tumour specific parameters associated with the use of enteral nutrition either before (prophylactic) or during (reactive) radiotherapy (RT). The significant parameters identified were then selected into categorical variables and compared between those who needed reactive enteral nutrition and the remainder of the group who did not. These results were used to generate predictive factors that could be used to identify those at high risk of malnutrition during RT for whom early or prophylactic enteral nutrition should be considered.

RESULTS

Fifty patients required enteral feeding of which 60% required this prior to radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis identified the following factors to be significant--body mass index, performance status (PS), advanced stage, pre-treatment weight loss, low serum albumin and protein, age, and smoking. The most significant categorical predictive parameters for reactive enteral feeding were stage 3-4 disease, PS 2-3, and smoking >20/day. The combination of these factors predicted a 75% chance of needing enteral nutrition.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional assessment is important prior to radiotherapy and is multifactorial. Using a combination of relatively simple and objective parameters, (performance status, smoking and disease stage) it is possible to identify those at high risk of needing enteral nutrition prior to starting RT.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients undergoing resection for oral tumors: a retrospective review of complications and outcomes

PURPOSE

The use of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in patients undergoing resection for oral tumors is not universal, and varying complication rates have been reported. This study reviews our experience with the use of a PEG as an adjunct in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients treated for oral tumors by oral and maxillofacial surgery were reviewed retrospectively. All patients undergoing resection for oral tumors and having a PEG were included. Patient age, gender, disease type, and stage, as well as type of operation, were recorded. Data obtained included the timing of PEG placement, duration of PEG use, and PEG complications. Patient weight and body mass index (BMI) were abstracted when recorded preoperatively and about 2 weeks and between 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Weight and BMI results were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty PEGs were placed in 49 patients with oral tumors. The mean age of the patients was 61 years. More than 90% of tumors were squamous cell carcinomas. Most PEG tubes were placed at the time of resection by 1 surgeon and were retained for a mean duration of 114 days. A minor complication rate of 10% and a major complication rate of 8% were noted. Weight decreased significantly by 2.9% from preoperative level to week 2, but there was no other significant difference found between any other weight or BMI measurement. Incidental findings on PEG placement included Barrett's metaplasia in one patient and gastric adenocarcinoma in another.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PEG in patients with oral tumors at our institution was found to be effective in maintaining adequate nutrition, as assessed by weight and BMI, during recovery and convalescence. There is an acceptable low complication rate. Use of an experienced endoscopist and PEG placement at the time of resection are advocated.

Endoscopic techniques for enteral nutrition: standards and innovations

Enteral nutrition has been increasingly used in clinical practice during the past decades. Today, nasogastric, nasoenteric, and transcutaneous gastric or enteral feeding tubes are well established as a routine endoscopic intervention. After clinical introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 1980, the sutureless 'pull' PEG has become a widespread endoscopic technique for transcutaneous gastric long-term nutrition. Multiple new techniques have been introduced since then, and today even long-term jejunal nutrition can be achieved with modified techniques. The introducer PEG (first reported in 1984) has not become an established procedure, but new techniques with an endoscopic gastropexy might be a more effective approach. To increase the quality of life of the patients, skin-level devices were designed and successfully introduced in 1984. A new development has been the one-step feeding tubes which provide the patients with a permanent tube. The standard techniques for long-term enteral feeding, new developments of feeding tubes, and future concepts are discussed in this review.

Preoperative nutritional support at home in head and neck cancer patients: from nutritional benefits to the prevention of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preoperative nutritional support in severely malnourished patients decreases complications after major surgery. This review summarizes previous studies on head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery, and offers recommendations on preoperative nutritional support based on the literature and our experience.

RECENT FINDINGS

Head and neck cancer has a large impact on the patient's quality of life and a high mortality rate. Aggressive surgical resection followed by soft-tissue and osseous reconstruction is the gold standard of treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications is high at 20-50%. Malnutrition and alcohol withdrawal syndrome are often present, and are considered risk factors for developing wound infection after head and neck cancer surgery. Proactive intervention by preoperative nutritional support may correct nutrient deficiencies, minimize malnutrition-related morbidity and mortality, reduce the length and cost of hospitalization, and may prevent alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Nutritional support given preoperatively for 7-10 days decreases postoperative complications by approximately 10% in malnourished patients with weight loss of 10% or more. Oral liquid supplements and enteral nutrition are useful to support head and neck cancer patients preoperatively. Enteral nutrition is safer, more physiological, less expensive and practicable at home compared with parenteral nutrition, which is not usually indicated in these patients.

SUMMARY

Enteral nutrition is efficient in preoperative phase to prevent postoperative complications. However evidence is insufficient to conclude that preoperative immune-enhancing enteral feeding provides any supplementary benefit by comparison with a standard diet. Our experience with the preoperative approach in head and neck cancer patients is reported in this paper.