Clinical utility of PET/CT in the evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with an unknown primary: a prospective clinical trial

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can either be examined with hybrid PET/MR imaging systems or sequentially, using PET/CT and MR imaging. Regardless of the acquisition technique, the superiority of MR imaging compared to CT lies in its potential to interrogate tumor and surrounding tissues with different sequences, including perfusion and diffusion. For this reason, PET/MR imaging is preferable for the detection and assessment of locoregional residual/recurrent HNSCC after therapy. In addition, MR imaging interpretation is facilitated when combined with PET. Nevertheless, distant metastases and distant second primary tumors are detected equally well with PET/MR imaging and PET/CT.

Pre-CCRT 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT improves survival in patients with advanced stages p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma via accurate radiation treatment planning

PURPOSE

No large-scale prospective randomized study with a long-term follow-up period has evaluated the survival outcomes of preconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸FDG PET-CT) in patients with non-human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients with stage I-IVA p16-negative OPSCC receiving definitive CCRT and categorized them into two groups according to pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT and compared their outcomes: the case group consisted of patients who underwent pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT, whereas the comparison group consisted of patients who did not receive pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 3942 patients (1663 and 2279 in the case and comparison groups, respectively). According to multivariable Cox regression analysis, pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT was not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with stages I-II of p16-negative OPSCC receiving standard CCRT. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of all-cause death for the patients with advanced stages (III-IVA) of p16-negative OPSCC receiving pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT was 0.75 (0.87-0.94, P = 0.0236).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT is not necessary for each patient with p16-negative OPSCC. Pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT is associated with improved survival in patients with stage III-IVA p16-negative OSCC, but might be not in those with stage I-II p16-negative OPSCC. No large-scale prospective randomized study with a long-term follow-up period has evaluated the survival outcomes of preconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸FDG PET-CT) in patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study is the first, largest, homogenous modality study on PET-CT including a long-term follow-up cohort to examine the survival outcomes of pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT or non-pre-CCRT PET-CT for patients with p16-negative OPSCC receiving standard CCRT stratified by different clinical stages. Routine use of pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT is not necessary for each patient with p16-negative OPSCC. Pre-CCRT ¹⁸FDG PET-CT is associated with improved survival in patients with stage III-IVA p16-negative OPSCC, but might be not in those with stage I-II p16-negative OPSCC.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cervical lymph node metastasis from unknown primary sites: a single institution's 14-year experience

BACKGROUND

Cervical lymph node metastasis from unknown primary sites is a challenging clinical issue with a changing therapy model and unpredictable outcomes, which leads to the difficulty in selecting optimal treatments. Thus, it is valuable to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the patients who receive different management styles.

METHODS

All patients with cervical lymph node metastasis from unknown primary sites were reviewed and no primary lesions were found. In addition, this work was funded by the Clinical Trial Fund Project of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (No. C1716). Specifically, we used univariate, multiple regression analysis to evaluate the factors associated with prognosis.

RESULTS

365 patients met the inclusion criteria, and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 77.0% and 33.4%, respectively, with a median survival of 45 months. Gender, age, pathological type, nodal status, and necessary cervical lymph node dissection affected locoregional control. Distant metastasis was common in individuals with a pathological type of adenocarcinoma, poor differentiation, and advanced nodal status. Furthermore, patients who received induction chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those treated with postoperative chemotherapy. Multiple regression analysis showed that pathological grade, treatment models, and distant metastasis were associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, local recurrence exerted a significant influence on OS. Induction chemotherapy and postsurgical radiotherapy seemed to improve the prognosis of patients at the advanced stage compared with simple surgery and postsurgical chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological grade, treatment models, and distant metastasis were independent risk factors for prognosis. Induction chemotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy benefited patients at the advanced stage, and patients with adenocarcinoma, poor differentiation, and advanced nodal status should undergo induction chemotherapy in light of the increased risk of distant metastasis.

Survival effect of pretreatment FDG-PET-CT on nasopharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Accurate staging is the first step for optimal treatment selection in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this propensity-score-matched, population-based cohort study, we investigated the survival effects of pretreatment 8-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET-CT) on patients with NPC.

METHODS

We included patients with stage I-IVA NPC receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy and categorized them into two 1:1 propensity score-matched groups according to whether or not they underwent pretreatment ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT and compared their outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 10,756 patients, propensity score matching yielded 4366 patients in each group. According to multivariable Cox regression analyses, the most prominent correlation between pretreatment ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT and all-cause death was observed in patients with stage II NPC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P = .0433), followed by patients with stage III NPC (aHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; P = .0071) and patients with stage IVA NPC (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97; P = .0091). This association was not significant in patients with stage I NPC (aHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.75-1.93; P = .4426).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT is associated with longer survival in patients with clinical stage II-IVA NPC but not in stage I NPC.

Advancement in the Oropharyngeal Primary Unknown Cancer Diagnostic and Current Treatments Pathway: A Narrative Review

Objective: The objective of this article is to define a correct diagnostic pathway for oropharyngeal cancer of unknown primary (OPCUP) identification. Background: OPCUP represents one of the most frequent causes of neck metastases onset without the identification of the primary tumor. Therefore, there is a high percentage of late or missing diagnoses, resulting in treatment delay or in a wrong therapeutic process. The up-to-date diagnostic procedures can help us to begin therapies at the right time. Methods: This is a review of the latest articles about diagnostic pathways in the OPCUP. A selection of the references was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CENTRAL electronic databases. Conclusion: The oropharynx represents the most common site of primary unknown head and neck cancer (HNCUP). Recent epidemiologic data reported an increasing incidence of HNCUP related to human papilloma virus positive squamous cell carcinoma. Positron emission tomography combined with computerized tomography scanning or magnetic resonance imaging allows for improving the detection of primary unknown tumors and distant and locoregional metastases. Finally, the introduction of the trans-oral robotic surgical approach has introduced a new role of surgery in the HNCUP diagnosis and treatment. Hence, the new technological improvement allows reaching in most HNCUP patients an early diagnosis, achieving targeted management and better treatment outcomes, as well as decreasing toxicity and the side effects of treatment options.

Cancer of the Oropharynx and the Association with Human Papillomavirus

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPC) consists of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative disease caused by tobacco and alcohol use, and HPV-positive disease caused by the sexually transmitted infection HPV. These entities have unique but overlapping risk factors, epidemiologic trends, staging systems, and survival outcomes. HPV-positive tumor status confers a significant survival benefit compared with HPV-negative disease. OPC treatment entails a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Ongoing trials will determine whether treatment of HPV-related disease may be safely deintensified to decrease morbidity. Emerging HPV-related biomarkers are under study as tools to inform screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for HPV-positive OPC.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of occult primary tumors in squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) for the detection of occult primary tumors in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) in the head and neck.

PATIENTS

From March 2016 to January 2020, 37 patients diagnosed as SCCUP before PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of SCCUP was made when an overt primary tumor location could not be found for histologically proven squamous cell cervical lymphadenopathy after a complete diagnostic workup which includes full medical history, physical examinations, flexible rhinolaryngoscopy and CT or MRI. The PET/CT images were visually assessed by two nuclear medicine radiologists. Histopathological investigations after the PET scan served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT for SCCUP were 71.4, 43.8, 62.5, 53.9 and 59.5%, respectively. PET/CT allowed identification of previously undetected lesions in 40.5% of the SCCUP patients. A total of 24 PET/CT scans indicated a positive result. Among them, nine were categorized into false-positive because of negative results from subsequent targeted and random biopsies. There were 13 PET/CT scans with a negative result, six of which, however, were revealed to have a primary site by subsequent random biopsies.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT was shown to be useful in detecting a primary tumor for SCCUP, but had limitations in terms of both false-positive cases and false-negative cases. Therefore, histopathological investigations such as targeted and random biopsy should be viewed as necessary practice irrespective of PET/CT results.

Diagnostic approaches to carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes arising from an undetected primary tumour, termed carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP), is a well-recognized clinical presentation within head and neck oncology. SCCUP is a common presentation for patients with human papillomavirus-mediated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV + OPSCC), as patients with HPV + OPSCC often present with smaller primary tumours and early nodal metastasis. Meticulous work-up of the SCCUP patient is central to the management of these patients as identification of the primary site improves overall survival and allows for definitive oncologic resection or more focused radiation when indicated. This review summarizes the comprehensive diagnostic approach to the SCCUP patient, including history and physical examination, methods of biopsy of the cervical lymph node, imaging modalities and intraoperative methods to localize the unknown primary. Novel techniques such as transcervical ultrasound of the oropharynx, narrow band imaging and diagnostic transoral robotic surgery are also discussed.

Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the clinical utility of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) relative to [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis utilized a sub-cohort of patients from a previously acquired database. Patients with NPC who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT between October 2019 and November 2020 were included. The radiotracer uptake and clinical staging/restaging performances of [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-five participants (39 for initial assessment, 6 for recurrence detection) were included. In treatment-naïve participants, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed higher radiotracer uptake than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in primary tumors (16.18 vs. 10.11, P < 0.001), regional lymph nodes (11.42 vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and bone and visceral metastases (6.94 vs. 3.11, P < 0.001). Compared with the [¹⁸F]FDG-based TNM stage, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-based TNM stage was upgraded in ten patients (26%), resulting in management changes in seven patients (18%). Compared with MRI, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT upgraded and underestimated the T stage in four and two patients, respectively. In post-treatment patients, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT yielded more true-positive findings than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in detecting local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic NPC. The exact tumor geographic imaging obtained through [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT may be a supplement to MRI for T staging and radiotherapy planning.

Narrowband Imaging for p16+ Unknown Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prior to Transoral Robotic Surgery

Our purpose was to assess the potential utility of narrowband imaging (NBI) as a tool in diagnosing and treating unknown primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in patients prior to diagnostic resection with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Between 2016 and March 2019, 29 patients with carcinoma of unknown primary meeting inclusion criteria were identified and treated with TORS. NBI was used preoperatively in 9 of 29 patients. A suspected tumor site was delineated by NBI in 8 of 9 patients (89%). Of the patients imaged with NBI, 8 of 9 (89%) patients had a pathologically confirmed tumor following TORS, corresponding to the same 8 suspected tumor sites identified with NBI. In contrast, a primary tumor was localized following TORS in 15 of 20 (75%) patients not evaluated with NBI. Thus, we see NBI as a potentially useful tool for the diagnosis and management of p16+ carcinoma of unknown primary.Level of Evidence: IIb.

Diagnosis and Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on the diagnosis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP).

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2008 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, local and regional disease control, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 100 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Four main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate pathology techniques, and adjuvant therapy.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address preoperative evaluation for patients with a neck mass, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate treatment options in unilateral versus bilateral SCCUP.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Advances in Functional Imaging in the Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer

This article discusses the application of fludeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) technology in head and neck cancer diagnosis and management, as well as advantages and disadvantages relative to traditional imaging modalities. A successful scan relies on precise patient preparation, and compliance to specific protocols before and during the scan. Finally, this article briefly introduces a PET/CT scan recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for neuroendocrine tumors.

Pharyngeal-sparing radiation for head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary following TORS assisted work-up

OBJECTIVE

In patients with head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP;pT0) following TORS-assisted workup, we have adopted a pharyngeal-sparing radiation therapy (PSRT) approach targeting only the at-risk neck and omitting treatment of the pharynx. We report outcomes following PSRT, and compare to institutional historical control subjects who received pharyngeal-targeted RT (PRT).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2018, 172 patients underwent TORS-assisted endoscopy as part of their workup for HNCUP. Following TORS, 54 patients had pT0 disease, of which 45 received RT. Forty-nine percent received PSRT and 51% received PRT.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences existed between the PSRT and PRT groups with respect to overall nodal distribution, p16 positivity (55% vs. 43%, P = .12), neck dissection rates (77% vs. 65%, P = .51), and administration of chemotherapy (55% vs. 65%, P = .55). Median follow-up for PSRT and PRT groups were 24 and 28 months, respectively (P = .04). Two-year RFS was 86% and 74% for PSRT and PRT patients, respectively (log-rank P = .30). Three and six patients recurred after PSRT and PRT, respectively. Two-year OS for PSRT and PRT patients was 91% and 74%, respectively (log-rank P = .31). Compared to PRT, PSRT was associated with statistically significantly less: grade 2+ mucositis (18% vs. 91%, P < .01), new opioid requirement (27% vs. 91%, P < .01), mean weight loss during RT (6.2 lbs vs. 17.4 lbs, P < .01), feeding tube placement during RT (5% vs. 43%, P < .01), and treatment-related unplanned hospitalizations (9% vs. 39%, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Following TORS-assisted management of patients with pT0 HNCUP, we observed reduced toxicity following PSRT compared to PRT without apparent compromise of disease cure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 evidence, retrospective review comparing cases and controls Laryngoscope, 130:691-697, 2020.

The Incidence of Nonmalignant Diseases among Patients with Suspected Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site

Objective Few reports have analyzed the diagnostic process of carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) or have focused on the frequency of nonmalignant lesions among patients with suspected malignant diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of nonmalignant diseases that tend to be mistaken for malignant diseases. Patients We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with suspected CUP who were referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between April 2007 and December 2014. All patients underwent a thorough history and physical examination as well as radiological and ultrasonography imaging tests for the CUP diagnostic work up. Results Among 830 patients with suspected CUP, 46 were diagnosed with nonmalignant diseases, and 780 were diagnosed with a malignant neoplasm (409 neoplasms with detected primary site and 371 CUP neoplasms). Four patients discontinued the diagnostic workup because they refused further examinations or had a poor general status. The final diagnosis of the 46 patients with nonmalignant disease comprised 10 benign tumors, 10 benign diseases, and 26 with no evidence of disease. The nonmalignant tumors comprised three hemangiomas, two schwannomas, two uterine myomas, two pseudomyxoma peritonei, one lymphangioma, one meningioma, and one poroma. Conclusion The incidence of nonmalignant diseases among patients with suspected CUP was 46 out of 830 patients in our institution. It is important to perform a thorough pathological examination in the CUP diagnostic workup. To confirm a diagnosis, some patients may need to visit specialized institutions, especially those with liver and bone lesions.

FDG PET/CT for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

The role of FDG PET/CT is uncertain in squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP). Published data are limited by heterogeneity of pathology, varied diagnostic criteria, and small sample size.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in 40 patients who had FDG PET/CT for SCCUP. Prior to PET/CT, patients had underwent standard clinical evaluations including flexible rhinolaryngoscopy. The majority of the patients had anatomic imaging. All subjects had histopathological investigations, and follow-up data after PET/CT.

RESULTS

FDG PET/CT detected the primary in 16 of 40 patients (40%), and the most common locations of the primary were in the base of the tongue, palatine tonsil, and hypopharynx. There were 10 false positive and 6 false negative PET/CT scans. There was no difference in the mean SUVs of the suspected primary lesions between true and false positive groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy of FDG PET/CT for SCCUP in this patient cohort were 72.7% (16/22), 44.4% (8/18), 61.5% (16/26), 57.1% (8/14), and 60% (24/40), respectively. The tonsil was the site with the most false positive and false negative findings.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT might be an effective single shot of whole-body imaging for detection of the primary in SCCUP. Low specificity remained the most notable weakness of FDG-PET in work-up for SCCUP. In addition to varied physiologic uptake or inflammatory related uptake in the common locations of the primary, the image indication bias might be another significant contributor of high false positive rate.

A critical appraisal of the quality of head and neck cancer imaging guidelines using the AGREE II tool: A EuroAIM initiative

Background

Diagnostic imaging guidelines are increasingly embraced in oncologic imaging in order to improve examinations appropriateness and technical quality. The usefulness of guidelines employment in clinical practice is dramatically related to the quality of the guidelines themselves. However, an extreme variability in guidelines’ quality may occur. Following a European Network for the Assessment of Imaging in Medicine (EuroAIM) initiative, the aim of this study was to assess the quality of the available guidelines regarding head and neck cancer (HNC) imaging.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify imaging guidelines focused on HNC. Selected guidelines were evaluated by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation version 2.0 (AGREE II) tool, which comprises 23 key items, rated on a 7‐point scale (1—strongly disagree to 7—strongly agree) and organized within six domains. For each domain, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement among appraisers’ scores.

Results

After literature search, three guidelines were selected and evaluated. One guideline scored “average” as overall quality, while the remaining two scored a “low” overall quality. The highest result (total score = 75.0% ± 19.3%) was obtained in domain 4 (Clarity of presentation) while the lowest (total score = 27.1% ± 4.2%) in domain 6 (Editorial independence). ICC analysis showed a very good agreement (range: 0.932‐0.961) among the four appraisers.

Conclusions

Our results showed a heterogeneous quality of existing guidelines in HNC imaging. Issues raised from this appraisal should be considered when developing future guidelines on HNC imaging.

The Impact of a Stepwise Approach to Primary Tumor Detection in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Neck With Unknown Primary

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To examine the cumulative effect of diagnostic steps for primary tumor identification in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP), including lingual tonsillectomy, and the impact of primary tumor identification on subsequent treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 110 patients diagnosed with HNSCCUP between 2003 and 2015. Results of diagnostic imaging (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography [FDG-PET/CT]), tumor detection with direct laryngoscopy with biopsies, palatine tonsillectomy, and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) lingual tonsillectomy were recorded. Associations between demographic and treatment variables with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were modeled with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

FDG-PET/CT was suspicious for a primary site in 23/77 (30%) patients. Direct laryngoscopy identified a primary tumor in 34/110 patients (31%). Forty-seven patients underwent palatine tonsillectomy, which identified 17 primaries (36%), yielding a cumulative primary tumor identification of 51/110 (46%). Fourteen patients underwent TORS lingual tonsillectomy, which identified eight primaries (57%), resulting in a cumulative identification of 59/110 (53%). The detection rate increased from 28/63 (44%) to 31/47 (66%) after the addition of TORS lingual tonsillectomy to our institutional approach. Detection rates varied by HPV status. Primary tumor identification altered subsequent radiation planning, as patients with an identified primary tumor received radiation to a smaller volume of tissue than did those without an identified primary tumor. However, there was no significant association between primary tumor identification and OS or PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

A stepwise approach to primary tumor identification identifies a primary tumor in a majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 129:1610-1616, 2019.

Combination of panendoscopy and positron emission tomography/computed tomography increases detection of unknown primary head and neck carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

With positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) now commonplace as a diagnostic tool, new questions have arisen regarding the utility and cost-effectiveness of panendoscopy. In this retrospective review of a large cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCC-UP), we describe the enduring utility of panendoscopy in the detection of the primary site of mucosal disease even when PET/CT is negative.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients presenting to the senior author (y.d.) from July 1 1997 to July 1 2017 with fine-needle aspiration-proven metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the neck. All patients underwent formal panendoscopy (direct laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and rigid esophagoscopy). Presence of squamous cell carcinoma on final pathology was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients had HNSCC-UP, with 87 positive and 103 negative on PET/CT. Of the PET/CT-negative patients, 71 patients retained the HNSCC-UP designation after panendoscopy. Eighteen patients (56% of cases) were found to have primary tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Eight of 32 primary sites were found in the base of tongue (25%), with HPV positivity in two of these patients. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of PET/CT in detecting the primary site in unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the total study population were 73.1% and 68.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical panendoscopy has an important role in the workup of patients with unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. There is a high rate of cancer diagnosis, even in PET/CT negative patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2573-2575, 2018.

Cancer of Unknown Primary: Opportunities and Challenges

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as histologically proven metastatic tumors whose primary site cannot be identified during pretreatment evaluation. Among all malignancies, 3%–5% remained as CUP even after the extensive radiological and pathological workup. Immunohistochemistry and molecular gene expression tumor profiling are being utilized to predict the tissue of origin. Unfortunately, the survival of these patients remains poor (6–9 months) except in 20% of patients who belong to a favorable subset (12–36 months). There is a need to understand the basic biology and to identify the molecular pathways which can be targeted with small molecules. This article reviews our current approach as well as treatment evolution occurred in the past three decades.

Unilateral radiotherapy treatment for p16/human papillomavirus-positive squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The outcomes of unilateral radiotherapy treatment for patients with p16/HPV-positive squamous cell carcinomas of unknown primary (SCCUP) affecting cervical lymph nodes are under-reported. Compared to radiating large volumes of the pharyngeal axis (the more common approach), this is potentially a much less toxic treatment for a good prognosis group.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We identified patients with SCCUP who were treated radically at our center and did not have parotid or isolated level IV or V nodal involvement. Failure-free and overall survivals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2012, there were 49 radically treated patients with SCCUP. Fourteen patients had bilateral neck treatment (they had bilateral nodal disease or suspected lesions in the base of tongue, though not proven with biopsy), two had surgery alone, whereas 33 had unilateral radiotherapy (after neck dissection, excisional biopsy, or definitively with concurrent chemotherapy). Of the 33 patients, 21 tested positive to p16/HPV and had median follow-up of 57 months. In this group, no isolated contralateral neck failures or putative primaries emerged. There was 1/21 (4.3%) ipsilateral neck failure, 1/21 (4.3%) concurrent contralateral neck and distant failure, and 1/21 (4.3%) patient with distant failure. The 5-year freedom from failure was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-100%) and overall survival was 90% (95% CI: 79%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

With no emergence of putative primaries and no isolated contralateral neck failures, this single-institution experience in p16/HPV-positive SCCUP patients suggests that unilateral radiotherapy may be an underutilized management strategy.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 128:2076-2083, 2018.

Effectiveness of primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy on unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION

The review question is: what is the effectiveness of primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy on disease-free survival and quality of life in adults with an unknown primary, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Guideline recommendations for head and neck cancer of unknown primary site

This article reviews the clinical practice guidelines for head and neck oncology focusing on the management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (CUP). The primary purpose of this series is to raise awareness of the current guidelines in head and neck oncology by reviewing the recommendations and the evidence supporting such recommendations, particularly those published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). We review the importance of a thorough history and physical examination, the impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition changes and the importance of immunohistochemistry, the timing and type of imaging, the role of panendoscopy and tonsillectomy (palatine and lingual), and the role of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in the primary management of these tumors.

Chapter 8 On the Horizon: Advanced Imaging Techniques to Improve Noninvasive Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes

Conventional imaging modalities are limited in the evaluation of lymph nodes as they predominantly rely on size and morphology, which have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity for malignancy. In this review we will explore the role of "on the horizon" advanced imaging modalities that can look beyond the size and morphologic features of a cervical lymph node and explore its molecular nature and can aid in personalizing therapy rather than use the "one-size-fits-all" approach.

Management delays in patients with squamous cell cancer of neck node(s) and unknown primary site: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We aim to characterize the workup received by and identify any delays to diagnosis or treatment in patients referred to a tertiary cancer centre with the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in neck node(s) and no identifiable primary (SCCNIP).

METHODS

Over 1 year, 68 patients were initially referred to the Head and Neck clinic with a label of "primary unknown". After extensive workup, 29 of the 68 patients were found to have pathologically confirmed SCCNIP. For these 29 patients, imaging tests, biopsies, examinations and times to treatment were reviewed and compared to 145 patients referred for known primaries.

RESULTS

In 21/29 (72%) patients, ultrasound was ordered prior to biopsy or referral. After referral, the first imaging test used was CT neck in 28 patients and PET/CT in 1 patient. Median time from referral to primary identification (n = 23) or workup completion (n = 6) were 16 (range: 0-48) and 36 (17-82) days respectively. Median time from referral to treatment was 55 (27-90; n = 26) days and was longer than those referred for known primaries (48 days; 20-162; p < 0.001). Across all patients, median time between first diagnostic imaging test and pathologic diagnosis were 20.5 and -8.0 days (p < 0.0001) in patients receiving ultrasound and CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, delays to management were linked to community use of ultrasound and scheduling of both CT and PET/CT after thorough head and neck examination in patients with SCCNIP.

[PET-CT in head and neck cancer]

The importance of ¹⁸F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the diagnosis of malignant disease is increasing. On one hand, this is due to the high sensitivity of this method, on the other, because the entire body can be examined. FDG-PET can be particularly advantageous for the diagnosis of head and neck tumors, where tumor staging is an important prognostic parameter and essentially determines the therapeutic regimen. This article presents the different possibilities for combined evaluation with PET and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of patients with head and neck cancer. Special focus is placed on primary staging and tumor follow-up, as well as on the role of PET-CT in the diagnosis of patients with cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP). The use of PET-CT for radiotherapy planning and new aspects of PET technology are also discussed.

Overview of the predictive value of quantitative 18 FDG PET in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) allows to quantify the metabolic activity of a tumor (glycolysis) and has become a reference tool in oncology for the staging, restaging, radiotherapy planning and monitoring response in many cancers. Quantitative analyses have been introduced in order to overcome some of the limits of the visual methods, allowing an easier and more objective comparison of the inter- and intra-patients variations. The aims of this review were to report available evidences on the clinical value of quantitative PET/CT parameters in HNC. Forty-five studies, for a total of 2928 patients, were analyzed. Most of the data available dealt with the intensity of the metabolism, calculated from the Standard Uptake Value (SUV). Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) was well correlated with overall survival and disease free survival, with a higher predictive value than the maximum SUV. Spatial distribution of metabolism and textural analyses seems promising.

Impact on Patient Management of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Used for Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of Data From the National Oncologic PET Registry

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the impact of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) on intended management of patients in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) for three different diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer (Dx), (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site when there is confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease (cancer of unknown primary origin [CUP]), and (c) detecting a primary tumor site when there is a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS).

METHODS

We reviewed a sample of randomly selected reports of NOPR subjects who underwent PET for Dx and CUP and all reports for PNS to find subjects for analysis. For these studies, we evaluated the impact of PET on referring physicians' intended management, based on their management plans reported before and after PET.

RESULTS

Intended management was changed more frequently in the CUP group (43.1%) than in the Dx (23.9%) and PNS (25.4%) groups (CUP vs. Dx, p < .0001; PNS vs. Dx, p < .0001; CUP vs. PNS, p < .0002). Referring physicians reported that, in light of PET results, they were able to avoid further testing in approximately three-fourths of patients (71.8%-74.6%). At the time when the post-PET forms were completed, biopsies of suspicious sites had been performed in 21.2%, 32.4%, and 23.2%, respectively, of Dx, CUP, and PNS cases.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of NOPR data shows that PET appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three common diagnostic indications.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

[(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three targeted diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer, (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site in a patient with confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease, and (c) detecting a primary tumor site in a patient with a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome.

Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in head and neck oncology: An update

Cancers of the head and neck account for more than half a million cases worldwide annually, with a significant majority diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Imaging studies such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) are widely used to determine the presence and extent of tumors and metastatic disease, both before and after treatment. Advances in PET/CT imaging have allowed it to emerge as a superior imaging modality compared to both CT and MRI, especially in detection of carcinoma of unknown primary, cervical lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, residual/recurrent cancer and second primary tumors, often leading to alteration in management. PET/CT biomarker may further provide an overall assessment of tumor aggressiveness with prognostic implications. As new developments emerged leading to better understanding and use of PET/CT in head and neck oncology, the aim of this article is to review the roles of PET/CT in both pre- and post-treatment management of HNSCC and PET-derived parameters as prognostic indicators.

Positron Emission Tomography in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

This article summarizes selected published studies on the use of FDG-PET and PET/CT in the workup of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). It shows that PET is a useful imaging modality in identification of the occult primary tumor and discovery of distant metastases. The results of PET often lead to a change in management in these patients. The limitations of PET in HNCUP are also discussed.

The utility of positron emission tomography with and without computed tomography in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer

Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans are widely used in the staging and monitoring of most malignancies. The differential for PET-positive cutaneous lesions includes primary skin cancers, infections, cutaneous metastases from distant malignancies, and benign neoplasms. In dermatology, PET/CT scans have been most widely studied in patients with melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma. The role of PET/CT scans in the management of other cutaneous malignancies is less clear, but it has shown great promise in the management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma and cutaneous lymphoma. This review seeks to address the usefulness of PET/CT scans in nonmelanoma skin cancer and to provide guidance regarding the management of patients with incidental PET-positive nodules. Currently, there is limited experience with PET/CT scans for staging and monitoring of non-head and neck metastatic basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, and results show limited sensitivity and specificity. We also address the evidence for management of an incidental PET-positive cutaneous nodule and recommend obtaining a biopsy specimen in patients with a known noncutaneous malignancy, a history of primary skin cancer, or a high risk of either cutaneous or noncutaneous malignancy.

Characteristics and Limitations of FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy, Metastatic Pathways, and Image Findings

OBJECTIVE

This image-based article illustrates the anatomic regions of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and describes the metastatic pathways in and TNM staging for each region. Both the role and limitations of FDG PET/CT in imaging such cancers are discussed, and cases exemplifying these issues are reported. Also included is a discussion of the use of FDG PET/CT to monitor the response of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck to therapy, in addition to a brief comparison of PET/CT with such traditional imaging modalities as CT, MRI, and ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, as imaged by FDG PET/CT, is crucial for determining treatment strategy, because it helps to avoid incorrect staging and also provides an accurate assessment of treatment response.

Role of 18-Fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography and subsequent panendoscopy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas of unknown primary (HNSCCUP) accounts for up to 10% of presenting head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Identification of the primary site allows for directed therapy. Where initial investigations have failed to locate the primary site, 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a useful tool with improved sensitivity over positron emission tomography alone. Following PET/CT scan, the role of subsequent panendoscopy ± biopsy has not been fully assessed. We aim to evaluate and quantify the role of PET/CT and subsequent panendoscopy in HNSCCUP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with HNSCCUP presenting between January 2005 and December 2010 at a regional oncology referral center were studied. All patients who presented with a metastatic neck node and unknown primary who had undergone PET/CT prior to panendoscopy were included. The accuracy of PET/CT was calculated and compared with panendoscopy and histopathological findings.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included. Twenty-seven PET/CT scans suggested a primary site. Calculated diagnostic parameters were 83% sensitivity, 87% specificity, positive predictive value 89%, and negative predictive value 80%. Three false-positive PET/CT scans were noted after panendoscopy and normal histology. Importantly, three confirmed tongue base tumors were found on panendoscopy, which were undetected on PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT is a valuable resource for locating tumors in HNSCCUP. It helps direct biopsy and aids in the detection of local and distant metastases along with synchronous primary tumors. Importantly, due to both false-positive and false-negative PET/CT rates, panendoscopy and biopsy remains an essential adjunct investigation irrespective of PET/CT results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 126:1354-1358, 2016.

Application of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiation treatment planning for head and neck cancers

18-fluorodeoxygluocose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET/CT) provides significant information in multiple settings in the management of head and neck cancers (HNC). This article seeks to define the additional benefit of PET/CT as related to radiation treatment planning for squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the head and neck through a review of relevant literature. By helping further define both primary and nodal volumes, radiation treatment planning can be improved using PET/CT. Special attention is paid to the independent benefit of PET/CT in targeting mucosal primaries as well as in detecting nodal metastases. The utility of PET/CT is also explored for treatment planning in the setting of SCC of unknown primary as PET/CT may help define a mucosal target volume by guiding biopsies for examination under anesthesia thus changing the treatment paradigm and limiting the extent of therapy. Implications of the use of PET/CT for proper target delineation in patients with artifact from dental procedures are discussed and the impact of dental artifact on CT-based PET attenuation correction is assessed. Finally, comment is made upon the role of PET/CT in the high-risk post-operative setting, particularly in the context of radiation dose escalation. Real case examples are used in these settings to elucidate the practical benefits of PET/CT as related to radiation treatment planning in HNCs.

FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations

Purpose

The Region of Southern Denmark (RSD), covering 1.2 of Denmark’s 5.6 million inhabitants, established a task force to (1) retrieve literature evidence for the clinical use of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and provide consequent recommendations and further to (2) compare the actual use of PET/CT in the RSD with these recommendations. This article summarizes the results.

Methods

A Work Group appointed a professional Subgroup which made Clinician Groups conduct literature reviews on six selected cancers responsible for 5,768 (62.6 %) of 9,213 PET/CT scans in the RSD in 2012. Rapid Evidence Assessment was applied, using the methodology of systematic reviews with predefined limitations to search PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English/Danish/Swedish/Norwegian since 2002. PICO questions were defined, data recorded and quality appraised and rated with regard to strength and evidence level. Consequent recommendations for applications of PET/CT were established. The actual use of PET/CT was compared with these, where grades A and B indicated “established” and “useful” and grades C and D “potentially useful” and “non-recommendable” indications, respectively.

Results

Of 11,729 citations, 1,729 were considered for review, and 204 were included. The evidence suggested usefulness of PET/CT in lung, lymphoma, melanoma, head and neck, and colorectal cancers, whereas evidence was sparse in gynaecological cancers. The agreement between actual use of PET/CT and literature-based recommendations was high in the first five mentioned cancers in that 96.2 % of scans were made for grade A or B indications versus only 22.2 % in gynaecological cancers.

Conclusion

Evidence-based usefulness was reported in five of six selected cancers; evidence was sparse in the sixth, gynaecological cancers. Actual use of PET/CT agreed well with recommendations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3217-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Utility of PET for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

PET imaging has contributed substantially in oncology by allowing improved clinical staging and guiding appropriate cancer management. Integration with radiotherapy planning via PET/computed tomography (CT) simulation enables improved target delineation, which is paramount for conformal radiotherapy techniques. This article reviews the present literature regarding implications of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning and management.

Cancer of Unknown Primary origin in the genomic era: Elucidating the dark box of cancer

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) comprises a heterogeneous disease group with diagnosis of metastatic malignancy in the absence of an identifiable primary site after diagnostic work up. CUP may either resemble a specific primary tumor site sharing common clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis, or present as a distinct disease entity with undifferentiated pathological features, usually bearing dismal prognosis. Diagnosis and management have traditionally been based on clinicopathological characteristics and therapeutic strategies have been mainly empirical. In the last decade, the advent of massive gene sequencing and the advances in genomic technologies have shed light on the genomic landscape of CUP. Several gene panel tests are currently commercially available and are used in an effort to correlate the genomic characteristics of a specific CUP tumor to those of a known primary tumor, guiding thus therapeutic management. Nevertheless, these efforts are hampered by the rarity of CUP and the inability to validate the results of such tests due to the paucity of randomized clinical trials. In the current work, we provide an overview of CUP with emphasis on the impact of the genome sequencing technologies on diagnosis and management of these tumors. We also discuss potential implications of genomics for the future treatment of CUP and address the challenges of the implementation of these therapeutic strategies in routine clinical practice.

Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology

(18)Fluorine-2-fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established functional imaging method widely used in oncology. In this article, we have incorporated the various indications for (18)FDG PET/CT in oncology based on available evidence and current guidelines. Growing body of evidence for use of (18)FDG PET/CT in select tumors is also discussed. This article attempts to give the reader an overview of the appropriateness of using (18)F-FDG PET/CT in various malignancies.

PET imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer

In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the role of imaging becomes more and more critical in the management process. In this framework, molecular imaging techniques such as PET allow noninvasive assessment of a range of tumour biomarkers such as metabolism, hypoxia and proliferation, which can serve different purposes. First, in a pretreatment setting they can influence therapy selection strategies and target delineation for radiation therapy. Second, their predictive and/or prognostic value could help enhance the therapeutic ratio in the management of HNSCC. Third, treatment modification can be performed through the generation of a molecular-based heterogeneous dose distribution with dose escalation to the most resistant parts of the tumour, a concept known as dose painting. Fourth, they are increasingly becoming a tool for monitoring response to therapy. In this review, PET imaging biomarkers used in the routine management of HNSCC or under investigation are discussed.

[Importance of nuclear medicine diagnostics in CUP syndrome]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

The diagnostic work-up in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome is extensive, highly time-consuming and cost-intensive and ultimately often fails to detect a primary site.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In this context chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) have been used as standard imaging modalities in CUP syndrome.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

Since the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) evaluation of tumor vitality has become possible. Furthermore, PET-CT hybrid scanners allow the combination of functional and morphological imaging.

PERFORMANCE

Several meta-analyses have reported an additional overall detection rate between 24.5 % and 44 % by either PET or PET-CT. Metastatic localization (cervical versus extracervical) did not influence the performance. The sensitivity was usually high (> 80 %) but specificity was moderate ranging from 68 % to 88 % at best. If mentioned, the results obtained by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET significantly changed the clinical management in approximately one third of the patients studied. In a direct comparison with PET alone, PET-CT did not depict significantly more primary tumors but was able to reduce false positive findings.

ACHIEVEMENTS

To determine the real additional value of PET-CT in the diagnosis of CUP syndrome large prospective studies with more uniform inclusion criteria are needed. Despite the capabilities of FDG-PET-CT there is as yet no evidence that a potentially improved diagnostic algorithm is translated into a better patient outcome.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Nevertheless, FDG-PET-CT should be performed in all CUP patients where conventional imaging failed to detect a primary site or the results are equivocal. In CUP patients with cervical lymph node metastases PET-CT should be carried out prior to panendoscopy to reduce the number of false negative biopsies.

Application of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of head and neck cancers

The use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) scan technology in the management of head and neck cancers continues to increase. We discuss the biology of FDG uptake in malignant lesions and also discuss the physics of PET imaging. The various parameters described to quantify FDG uptake in cancers including standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are presented. PET scans have found a significant role in the diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancers. They are also being increasingly used in radiation therapy treatment planning. Many groups have also used PET derived values to serve as prognostic indicators of outcomes including loco-regional control and overall survival. FDG PET scans are also proving very useful in assessing the efficacy of treatment and management and follow-up of head and neck cancer patients. This review article focuses on the role of FDG-PET computed tomography scans in these areas for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We present the current state of the art and speculate on the future applications of this technology including protocol development, newer imaging methods such as combined magnetic resonance and PET imaging and novel radiopharmaceuticals that can be used to further study tumor biology.

Role of panendoscopy in identifying and managing risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in routine follow-up: a retrospective clinical evaluation

We discuss the clinical effectiveness and predictive value of routine panendoscopy for surveillance and follow-up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective comparative study. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Two hundred and four HNSCC patients (follow-up between 2004 and 2007) were retrospectively evaluated. During follow-up, panendoscopy was performed routinely once a year. To avoid unnecessary procedures, we evaluated the value of radiological and clinical parameters in follow-up. On comparing normal-computerized tomography (CT) vs. abnormal CT results, a 13-fold higher frequency of recurrence (odds ratio 12.74; 95% CI 4.22, 38.48; p < 0.001) was found. Additionally, patient medical history, clinical investigation, and recurrence pattern were significant parameters when detecting a possible recurrence. Panendoscopy could have been avoided in 40% of patients with HNSCC (173/432). A follow-up schedule avoiding routine panendoscopy in HNSCC follow-up when the combination of diagnostic parameters is satisfactory does not influence the sensitivity or specificity of the test.