Correlation between radiologic and pathologic extranodal extension in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Systematic review

International Multi-Specialty Expert Physician Preoperative Identification of Extranodal Extension n Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients using Computed Tomography: Prospective Blinded Human Inter-Observer Performance Evaluation

Importance

Extranodal extension (pENE) is a critical prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) that drives therapeutic disposition. Determination of pENE from radiological imaging has been associated with high inter-observer variability. However, the impact of clinician specialty on human observer performance of imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) remains poorly understood.

Objective

To characterize the impact of clinician specialty on the accuracy of pre-operative iENE in human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) OPC using computed tomography (CT) images.

Design Setting and Participants

This prospective observational human performance study analyzed pre-therapy CT images from 24 HPV+ OPC patients, with duplication of 6 scans (n=30) of which 21 were pathologically confirmed pENE. Thirty-four expert observers, including 11 radiologists, 12 surgeons, and 11 radiation oncologists, independently assessed these scans for iENE and reported human-detected radiologic criteria and observer confidence.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and Brier score for each physician, compared to ground-truth pENE. The significance of radiographic signs for prediction of pENE were determined through logistic regression analysis. Fleiss' kappa measured interobserver agreement, and Hanley-MacNeil AUC discrimination testing.

Results

Median accuracy across all specialties was 0.57 (95%CI 0.39 to 0.73), with no specialty showing discriminate performance greater than random estimation (median AUC 0.64, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83). Significant differences between radiologists and surgeons in Brier scores (0.33 vs. 0.26, p < 0.01), radiation oncologists and surgeons in sensitivity (0.48 vs. 0.69, p > 0.1), and radiation oncologists and radiologists/surgeons in specificity (0.89 vs. 0.56, p > 0.1). Indistinct capsular contour and nodal necrosis were significant predictors of correct pENE status among all specialties. Interobserver agreement was weak for all the radiographic criteria, regardless of specialty (κ<0.6).

Conclusions and Relevance

Multiobserver testing shows physician discrimination of HPV+OPC pENE on pre-operative CT remains non-different than blind guessing, with high interrater variability and low diagnostic accuracy, regardless of clinician specialty. While minor differences in diagnostic performance among specialties are noted, they do not significantly affect the overall poor agreement and discrimination rates observed. The findings underscore the need for further research into automated detection systems or enhanced imaging techniques to improve the accuracy and reliability of iENE assessments in clinical practice.

Upfront Neck Dissection for Treatment Selection and Improvement in Quality of Life as a Novel Treatment Paradigm for Deintensification in HPV+ OPSCC

PURPOSE

Locoregionally advanced HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has excellent cure rates, although current treatment regimens are accompanied by acute and long-term toxicities. We designed a phase II deescalation trial for patients with HPV+ OPSCC to evaluate the feasibility of an upfront neck dissection to individualize definitive treatment selection to improve the quality of life without compromising survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with T1-3, N0-2 HPV+ OPSCC underwent an upfront neck dissection with primary tumor biopsy. Arm A included patients with a single lymph node less than six centimeters, with no extracapsular spread (ECS) and no primary site adverse features underwent transoral surgery. Arm B included patients who had two or more positive lymph nodes with no ECS, or those with primary site adverse features were treated with radiation alone. Arm C included patients who had ECS in any lymph node and were treated with chemoradiation. The primary endpoint was quality of life at 1 year compared with a matched historical control.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled and underwent selective neck dissection. On the basis of pathologic characteristics, 14 patients were assigned to arm A, 10 patients to arm B, and 9 to arm C. A significant improvement was observed in Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) compared with historical controls (-2.6 vs. -11.9, P = 0.034). With a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year overall survival was 100% and estimated 3-year estimated progression-free survival was 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 76%-99%].

CONCLUSIONS

A neck dissection-driven treatment paradigm warrants further research as a deintensification strategy.

The prognostic effect of radiological extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a retrospective cohort analysis

PURPOSE

Radiological extranodal extension (rENE) is a well-known negative prognosticator in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, controversy remains regarding the prognostic effect of rENE in HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCs (OPSCC). This single-center retrospective cohort analysis assessed the prognostic role of rENE in an HPV + OPSCC population and tried to validate a recently proposed modification of the TNM8 N-classification.

METHODS

129 patients with HPV + OPSCC, of whom 106 cN + patients, were included. Radiological imaging (CT, MRI or both) was reanalyzed by a senior head and neck radiologist. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Cox proportional hazard models were used for estimating hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

A non-significant trend towards better outcomes in the rENE- group, as compared to the rENE + population, was observed for 5 year OS [80.99% vs 68.70%, HR: 2.05, p = 0.160], 5 year RFS [78.81% vs 67.87%, HR: 1.91, p = 0.165], 5 year DFS [77.06% vs 60.16%, HR: 2.12, p = 0.0824] and 5 year DSS [88.83% vs 81.93%, HR: 2.09, p = 0.195]. OS declined with ascending levels of rENE (p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis identified cT-classification and smoking as independent negative predictors for OS/DFS. The proposed modification of the TNM8 N-classification could not be validated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rENE could not be identified as an independent negative prognosticator for outcome in our HPV + OPSCC population, outcomes tend to deteriorate with increasing rENE.

Extra-Capsular Spread of Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral, Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Comparative Subsite Analysis

BACKGROUND

The extra-capsular spread (ECS) of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a hallmark of aggressive primary tumor phenotype in head and neck cancer (HNC); however, the factors influencing ECS are poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study, including 190 cases of oral tongue cancer (OTC), 148 cases of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) (118 HPV-positive and 30 HPV-negative), and 100 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). Tumor dimension, tumor biological variables (lymphovascular/perineural invasion and histologic grade), and LNM variables (LNM number and size) were analyzed according to the presence of ECS using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.

RESULTS

LNM variables were significant factors for ECS in all subsites of HNC (p < 0.05), except HPV-positive OPC. In OTC, tumor dimensional variables were significantly related to ECS (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, in OPC and HPC, neither the primary tumor dimension nor the T status were significant factors for ECS occurrence. The predictability of ECS by ROC curve using multiple variables was 0.819 [95% confidence interval: 0.759-0.878] in OTC, 0.687 [0.559-0.815] in HPV-positive OPC, 0.823 [0.642-1.000] in HPV-negative OPC, and 0.907 [0.841-0.973] in HPC.

CONCLUSION

LNM variables were correlated with ECS occurrence for most HNC subsites, and site-dependent primary tumor characteristics might contribute differentially to the ECS development of LNM in HNC.