Beta-blockade prevents recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in well-compensated patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years of diagnosis. Several different treatments are available, which include endoscopic sclerotherapy, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and surgical portocaval shunts, among others. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different initial treatments for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for secondary prevention according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and a previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had no previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices, previous history of bleeding only from gastric varices, those who failed previous treatment (refractory bleeding), those who had acute bleeding at the time of treatment, and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR) and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 48 randomised clinical trials (3526 participants) in the review. Forty-six trials (3442 participants) were included in one or more comparisons. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies. The follow-up ranged from two months to 61 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias. A total of 12 interventions were compared in these trials (sclerotherapy, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, no active intervention, TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt), beta-blockers plus nitrates, portocaval shunt, sclerotherapy plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy plus nitrates). Overall, 22.5% of the trial participants who received the reference treatment (chosen because this was the commonest treatment compared in the trials) of sclerotherapy died during the follow-up period ranging from two months to 61 months. There was considerable uncertainty in the effects of interventions on mortality. Accordingly, none of the interventions showed superiority over another. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in fewer serious adverse events (number of people) than sclerotherapy (OR 0.19; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.54; 1 trial; 100 participants). Based on low or very low-certainty evidence, the adverse events (number of participants) and adverse events (number of events) may be different across many comparisons; however, these differences are due to very small trials at high risk of bias showing large differences in some comparisons leading to many differences despite absence of direct evidence. Based on low-certainty evidence, TIPS may result in large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation (HR 0.12; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.41; 1 trial; 58 participants). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, any variceal rebleed was probably lower in sclerotherapy than in no active intervention (HR 0.62; 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.99, direct comparison HR 0.66; 95% CrI 0.11 to 3.13; 3 trials; 296 participants), beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy than sclerotherapy alone (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.37 to 0.95; direct comparison HR 0.50; 95% CrI 0.07 to 2.96; 4 trials; 231 participants); TIPS than sclerotherapy (HR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.08 to 0.38; direct comparison HR 0.22; 95% CrI 0.01 to 7.51; 2 trials; 109 participants), and in portocaval shunt than sclerotherapy (HR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05 to 0.77; no direct comparison) groups. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more, other compensation, events than sclerotherapy (rate ratio 2.37; 95% CrI 1.35 to 4.67; 1 trial; 65 participants and rate ratio 2.30; 95% CrI 1.20 to 4.65; 2 trials; 109 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions including those related to beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions on mortality. Variceal band ligation might result in fewer serious adverse events than sclerotherapy. TIPS might result in a large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation. Sclerotherapy probably results in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than no active intervention. Beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy and TIPS probably result in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than sclerotherapy. Beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more other compensation events than sclerotherapy. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons. Accordingly, high-quality randomised comparative clinical trials are needed.

Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices

Bleeding from gastroesophageal varices is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Although there has been significance improvement in the prognosis of variceal bleeding with advancement in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for its management, mortality rate still remains high. Therefore, appropriate prevention and rapid, effective management of bleeding from gastroesophageal varices is very important. Recently, various studies about management of gastoesophageal varices, including prevention of development and aggravation of varices, prevention of first variceal bleeding, management of acute variceal bleeding, and prevention of variceal rebleeding, have been published. The present article reviews published articles and practice guidelines to present the most optimal management of patients with gastroesophageal varices.

Variceal rebleeding: use of drug therapy and endoscopic band ligation

Patients surviving a variceal bleed are at high risk of re-bleeding with a mortality of 25-50% during a 1-2 year follow-up. Several studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated reduced rates of oesophageal variceal rebleeding with the use of β-blockers. However, their use can be limited by contraindications or intolerance to therapy. Other trials have shown that addition of nitrates may improve the efficacy of β-blockers in prevention of variceal re-bleeding. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (VBL) has been shown in meta-analyses to decrease the rates of rebleeding and mortality compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy. Studies comparing combined drug therapy with VBL have shown similar rebleeding rates although there is a suggestion that survival may be higher in those given drug therapy. Recent data suggest that combined VBL and drug therapy reduces the risk of rebleeding from oesophageal varices compared with either therapy alone; however there appears to be no reduction in overall mortality.

Portal hypertension and gastrointestinal bleeding: Diagnosis, prevention and management

Bleeding from esophageal varices is a life threatening complication of portal hypertension. Primary prevention of bleeding in patients at risk for a first bleeding episode is therefore a major goal. Medical prophylaxis consists of non-selective beta-blockers like propranolol or carvedilol. Variceal endoscopic band ligation is equally effective but procedure related morbidity is a drawback of the method. Therapy of acute bleeding is based on three strategies: vasopressor drugs like terlipressin, antibiotics and endoscopic therapy. In refractory bleeding, self-expandable stents offer an option for bridging to definite treatments like transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Treatment of bleeding from gastric varices depends on vasopressor drugs and on injection of varices with cyanoacrylate. Strategies for primary or secondary prevention are based on non-selective beta-blockers but data from large clinical trials is lacking. Therapy of refractory bleeding relies on shunt-procedures like TIPS. Bleeding from ectopic varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia-syndrome is less common. Possible medical and endoscopic treatment options are discussed.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension

Gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Most patients bleed from esophageal or gastric varices, but bleeding from ectopic varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy is also possible. The management of acute bleeding has changed over the last years. Patients are managed with a combination of endoscopic and pharmacologic treatment. The endoscopic treatment of choice for esophageal variceal bleeding is variceal band ligation. Bleeding from gastric varices is treated by injection with cyanoacrylate. Treatment with vasoactive drugs as well as antibiotic treatment is started before or at the time point of endoscopy. The first-line treatment for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding is nonselective beta blockers. Pharmacologic therapy is recommended for most patients; band ligation is an alternative in patients with contraindications for or intolerability of beta blockers. Treatment options for secondary prophylaxis include variceal band ligation, beta blockers, a combination of nitrates and beta blockers, and combination of band ligation and pharmacologic treatment. A clear superiority of one treatment over the other has not been shown. Bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy or ectopic varices is less common. Treatment options include beta blocker therapy, injection therapy, and interventional radiology.

[Prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding]

Esophageal varices(EV) are present in 40% and 60% of Child-Pugh A and C patients, respectively when cirrhosis is diagnosed. EV bleeding is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis with a high probability of recurrence. Treatment to prevent first EV bleeding or rebleeding is mandatory. In small EV with high risk of bleeding, nonselective β-blockers should be used for the prevention of first variceal bleeding. For medium to large EV, nonselective β-blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) may be recommended to high risk varices. But, nonselective β-blockers are the first treatment option to non-high risk varices and EVL is an alternative when nonselective β-blockers are contraindicated or not tolerated. For the prevention of rebleeding, a combination of nonselective β-blockers and EVL may be the best option. A great improvement in the prevention of variceal bleeding has emerged over the last years. However, further therapeutic options that combine higher efficacy, better tolerance and fewer side effects are needed.

Doppler ultrasound of hepatic and system hemodynamics in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The progression of liver cirrhosis eventually increases cardiac output, while blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance are reduced. A complex behavior of portal hemodynamic to hepatic artery and system circulation has not yet been presented. There is a lack in knowledge about the correlation of local and systemic circulation parameters to the degree of liver failure, with respect to presence of ascites and esophageal varices.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study sample was 76 patients hospitalized for established alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Patients were divided into groups according to Child-Pugh clinical score; grade A (n = 24), B (n = 18) and C (n = 18). Ascites was found in 28 patients and esophageal varices in 46. Portal vein flow velocity (PVFV), hepatic artery resistance index (HARI), heart and great vessels within mediastinal cavity were assessed with ultrasound devices equipped with spectral Doppler.

RESULTS

Significant differences in mean blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) minute volume, cardiac index and PVFV were found in the group of patients with the most severe stage (C). In regard to presence of ascites statistically significant difference was observed in elevated mean blood pressure and SVRI. Correlation was found between conjugated HARI to blood pressure and to SVRI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with liver cirrhosis there is an inversely reciprocal relationship of conjugated HARI with PVFV, correlating to disease grade. PVFV in cirrhosis decreases and HARI values were over 0.7. Study demonstrated that combining echocardiography with abdominal Doppler ultrasound served as valuable non-invasive diagnostic insight in liver and systemic circulation among different grade of cirrhosis.

Acute variceal bleeding: pharmacological treatment and primary/secondary prophylaxis

Variceal bleeding is one of the most severe complications of portal hypertension related to liver cirrhosis. Primary prophylaxis is considered mandatory in patients with cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices, and once varices have bled, every effort should be made to arrest the haemorrhage and prevent further bleeding episodes. In acute variceal bleeding, vasoactive drugs that lower portal pressure should be started even before endoscopy, and should be maintained for up to 5 days. The choice of vasoactive drug should be made according to local resources. Terlipressin, somatostatin and octreotide can be used; vasopressin plus transdermal nitroglycerin may be used if no other drug is available. In variceal bleeding, antibiotic therapy is also mandatory. In primary and secondary prophylaxis, beta-blockers are the mainstay of therapy. In secondary prophylaxis (but not in primary prophylaxis) these drugs can be combined with organic nitrates.

Lamivudine treatment-related morphological changes of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM

Many studies have reported the therapeutic effects of lamivudine on cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B; however, no study has investigated the morphological changes of esophageal varices after lamivudine treatment.

METHOD

The morphological changes of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis were retrospectively compared between 12 patients treated with lamivudine and six historical untreated patients.

RESULTS

In the treated group, the HBV DNA and hyaluronic acid (HA) levels in the serum were significantly lower than those in the untreated group (P = 0.013 and P = 0.009, respectively) at the end of follow-up, with a significant improvement in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte score (P = 0.022). In the treated group, the disappearance or reduction of esophageal varices was observed in six (50%) of the 12 patients. In three (25%) of the 12 patients, esophageal varices worsened. In the remaining three patients (25%), there were no changes in esophageal varices. In the untreated group, all patients showed the worsening of esophageal varices during the follow-up period, with a significant difference between this group and the treated group (P = 0.009). The serum HA level decreased in the nine treated patients without worsening of esophageal varices. However, in the three patients with worsening, the HA level significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine treatment for patients with cirrhosis improves not only liver function but also esophageal varices.

Prevention of recurrent haemorrhage

Patients who survive a first bleeding episode of oesophageal varices have a high risk of rebleeding, which is associated with a high mortality rate. Prevention of a recurrent haemorrhage is therefore recommended. Patients who were not on a primary prophylaxis should be treated with non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, endoscopic band ligation or both. If beta-blockers are not tolerated or are contraindicated, patients should be treated with endoscopic band ligation. If these preventive strategies fail, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (covered) or a small-diameter surgical shunt is indicated.

Current management of the complications of portal hypertension: variceal bleeding and ascites

Portal hypertension is one of the main consequences of cirrhosis. It results from a combination of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and increased blood flow through the portal venous system. The condition leads to the formation of portosystemic collateral veins. Esophagogastric varices have the greatest clinical impact, with a risk of bleeding as high as 30% within 2 years of medium or large varices developing. Ascites, another important complication of advanced cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, is sometimes refractory to treatment and is complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome. We describe the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and the current management of its complications, with emphasis on the prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding and ascites.

A cost-utility analysis of secondary prophylaxis for variceal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Secondary prophylaxis for esophageal variceal hemorrhage (VH) is recommended, but there has never been a cost-utility analysis of its implementation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the cost utility of various strategies for the secondary prophylaxis of VH including (a) observation alone, (b) medical therapy (MED), (c) endoscopic band ligation (EBL), (d) endoscopic band ligation plus medical therapy (EBL + M), and (e) transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and to examine the effect of adherence on these strategies.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed for all five strategies, and included surveillance, risk of hepatic encephalopathy, complications, and nonadherence.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature and the Health Care Financing Administration.

TARGET POPULATION

People with cirrhosis and a history of controlled VH.

TIME HORIZON

Three years.

PERSPECTIVE

Third-party payer.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

Combination EBL + M was the optimal strategy, dominating all other strategies including observation, meaning that it was more effective and less expensive than the others. In addition, EBL alone dominated observation and TIPS in terms of QALYs, and MED alone dominated the strategy of observation in terms of QALYs.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Important variables affecting the optimal strategy were the odds ratio (OR) of VH with EBL compared to MED, the OR of VH with EBL + M compared to EBL, and patients' preferences regarding taking the medication as reflected in the associated toll exacted on the health state utility. Variations in these parameters within the range of clinical plausibility allowed EBL or MED to become the optimal strategy. TIPS was the optimal strategy only if adherence rates for all strategies were less than 12%. RESULTS OF MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS: Neither observation nor TIPS was ever the optimal strategy, and EBL + M was optimal in 62% of cases. If the variables identified in the sensitivity analysis were controlled, then EBL + M was optimal in 95% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS should be reserved only for patients with very poor adherence. Otherwise, patients are best served by medications, EBL, or a combination of both, depending on the comparative rates of rebleeding with each and patients' preferences regarding medical therapy. The redundancy of combination band ligation plus medical therapy can improve outcomes, particularly in the setting of poor patient adherence.

An evidence-based medicine approach to beta-blocker therapy in patients with cirrhosis

Disease management strategies have gained attention in recent years because of their potential to improve health-related quality of life and prevent excessive resource use. Despite recognition as an important cause of mortality, cirrhosis with portal hypertension has not been widely discussed as a condition amenable to planned care management. Given the effect of variceal hemorrhage as the most immediate life-threatening complication of portal hypertension, a number of high-quality controlled clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of beta-blocker therapy for primary and secondary prophylaxis. Despite the existence of practice guidelines that incorporate this information, specific clinical scenarios that demand consideration for beta-blocker therapy have not been well described. In this article, a number of hypothetical patient-based cases drawn from the authors' experiences are utilized to illustrate these issues.

Meta analysis of propranolol effects on gastrointestinal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients

AIM: To assess the effects of propranolol as compared with placebo on gastrointestinal hemorrhage and total mortality in cirrhotic patients by using meta analysis of 20 published randomized clinical trials.

METHODS: A meta analysis of published randomized clinical trials was designed. Published articles were selected for study based on a computerized MEDLINE and a manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles. Data from 20 relevant studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were retrieved by means of computerized and manual search. The reported data were extracted on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle, and treatment effects were measured as risk differences between propranolol and placebo. Pooled estimates were computed according to a random-effects model. We evaluated the pooled efficacy of propranolol on the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and the total mortality.

RESULTS: A total of 1859 patients were included in 20 trials, 931 in the propranolol groups and 928 as controls. Among the 652 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage, 261 patients were treated with propranolol, and 396 patients were treated with placebo or non-treated. Pooled risk differences of gastrointestinal hemorrhage were -18% [95%CI, -25%, -10%] in all trials, -11% [95%CI, -21%, -1%] in primary prevention trials, and -25% [95%CI, -39%, -10%] in secondary prevention trials. A total of 440 patients died, 188 in propranolol groups and 252 in control groups. Pooled risk differences of total death were -7% [95%CI, -12%, -3%] in all trials, -9% [95%CI, -18%, -1%] in primary prevention trials, and -5% [95%CI, -9%, -1%] in secondary prevention trials.

CONCLUSION: Propranolol can markedly reduce the risks of both primary and recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and also the total mortality.

Costs and clinical outcomes of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a decision analytic model

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend upper endoscopic screening for patients with hepatic cirrhosis and primary prophylaxis with a nonselective beta-blocker for those with large varices.

METHODS

However, only 25% of cirrhotics develop large varices. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the most cost-effective approach for primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Using a Markov model, we compared the costs and clinical outcomes of three strategies for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. In the first strategy, patients were given a beta-blocker without undergoing upper endoscopy. In the second strategy, patients underwent upper endoscopic screening; those found to have large varices were treated with a beta-blocker. In the third strategy, no prophylaxis was used. Selected sensitivity analyses were performed to validate outcomes. Our results show screening prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $37,300 and 5.72 quality-adjusted life yr (QALYs). Universal prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $34,100 and 6.65 QALYs. The no prophylaxis strategy was associated with a cost of $36,600 and 4.84 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $800/QALY for the endoscopic strategy relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. Screening endoscopy was cost saving when the compliance, bleed risk without beta-blocker, and variceal bleed costs were increased, and when the discount rate, bleed risk on beta-blockers, and cost of upper endoscopy were decreased. In contrast, the universal prophylaxis strategy was persistently cost saving relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. In comparing the strategies, sensitivity analysis on the death rates from variceal hemorrhage did not alter outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide economic and clinical support for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Universal prophylaxis with beta-blocker is preferred because it is consistently associated with the lowest costs and highest QALYs.

Pregnancy and liver disease

Liver disease has an impact on women's health during pregnancy because of the complex interactions between the physiologic changes induced by pregnancy and the pathophysiologic changes of liver disease. In particular, liver diseases that predominantly afflict females, such as primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis, pose a special problem for conception and management of pregnancy. Pregnancy, moreover, specifically is associated with several potentially life-threatening liver diseases. This article reviews comprehensively the impact of liver diseases on pregnancy and of pregnancy on liver function and liver disease.

Nadolol is superior to isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of the first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with ascites

BACKGROUND/AIMS

beta-blockers effectively prevent first variceal bleeding (FVB) in cirrhotic patients. In patients with ascites, however, their use might be precluded by a high rate of contraindications and side effects. We compared the efficacy and applicability of nadolol and isosorbide-mononitrate (IsMn) in preventing FVB in a population of cirrhotic patients at high risk of variceal bleeding with ascites, who can be frequently intolerant to beta-blockers.

METHODS

A total of 80 consecutive cirrhotic patients with ascites and esophageal varices (25% average risk of bleeding at 1 year) were considered, 28 were excluded due to contraindications and 52 were randomly assigned to receive nadolol (n=25) or IsMn (n=27).

RESULTS

Frequency of contraindications was greater for beta-blockers than IsMn (35 versus 0%, P=0.001). During 21.3+/-11.6 months of follow-up, side effects forced six patients taking nadolol and four taking IsMn to stop treatment. Bleeding occurred in two patients taking nadolol and ten taking IsMn. The probability of bleeding was significantly lower in the nadolol group (P<0.05), whereas overall survival was similar (seven patients on IsMn and eight on nadolol died, P=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ascites IsMn is tolerated but ineffective while nadolol is effective but less tolerated.

Management of portal hypertension after variceal hemorrhage

Each variceal bleed is associated with 20% to 30% risk of dying. Management of portal hypertension after a bleed consists of (1) control of bleeding and (2) prevention of rebleeding. Effective control of bleeding can be achieved either pharmacologically by administering somatostatin or octreotide or endoscopically via sclerotherapy or variceal band ligation. In practice, both pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy are used concomitantly. Rebleeding can be prevented by endoscopic obliteration of varices. In this setting, variceal ligation is the preferred endoscopic modality. B-blockade is as effective as endoscopic therapy and, in combination, the two modalities may be additive.

Natural history of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis

All patients with cirrhosis will eventually develop portal hypertension and esophagogastric varices. Bleeding from ruptured esophagogastric varices is the most severe complication of cirrhosis and is the cause of death in about one third of patients. The rate of development and growth of esophageal varices is poorly defined but in general seem to be related to the degree of liver dysfunction. Once varices have formed, they tend to increase in size and eventually to bleed. In unselected patients, the incidence of variceal bleeding is about 20% to 30% at 2 years. Variceal size is the single most important predictor of a first variceal bleeding episode. Several prognostic indexes based on endoscopic and clinical parameters have been developed to predict the risk of bleeding; however, their degree of accuracy is unsatisfactory. Death caused by uncontrolled bleeding occurs in about 6% to 8% of patients; the 6-week mortality rate after a variceal hemorrhage is 25% to 30%. There are no good prognostic indicators of death caused by uncontrolled bleeding or death within 6 weeks. Untreated patients surviving a variceal hemorrhage have a 1- to 2-year risk of rebleeding of about 60% and a risk of death of about 40% to 50%. The risk of bleeding is greatest in the first days after a bleeding episode and slowly declines thereafter. All patients surviving a variceal hemorrhage must be treated to prevent rebleeding. Varices can also be found in the stomach of cirrhotic patients, alone or in association with esophageal varices. Gastric varices bleed less frequently but more severely than esophageal varices. Portal hypertensive gastropathy is a common feature of cirrhosis, and its prevalence parallels the severity of portal hypertension and liver dysfunction. Portal hypertensive gastropathy can progress from mild to severe and vice-versa or even disappear completely. Acute bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy seems to be relatively uncommon, and less severe than bleeding from varices.

Review article: a drug therapy for the prevention of variceal haemorrhage

The development of varices is a major complication of cirrhosis, and variceal haemorrhage has a high mortality. There have been major advances in the primary and secondary prevention of variceal haemorrhage over the last 20 years involving endoscopic, radiological and pharmacological approaches. This review concentrates principally on drug therapy, particularly on the numerous haemodynamic studies. Many of these drugs have not been studied in clinical trials, but provide data about the underlying pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Also covered in this review are the randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that involve a large number of patients. These trials involve relatively few drugs such as non-selective beta-blockers and nitrates. Correlations between haemodynamic and clinical parameters are discussed. Despite the recent increase in the use of alternative endoscopic therapies, an effective and well tolerated drug remains a clinically important research goal.

The hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis: an overview

The hyperdynamic circulation begins in the portal venous bed as a consequence of portal hypertension due to the increased resistance to flow from altered hepatic vascular morphology of chronic liver disease. Dilatation of the portal vein is associated with increased blood flow, as well as the opening up or formation of veno-venous shunts and splenomegaly. At the same time, portal hypertension leads to subclinical sodium retention resulting in expansion of all body fluid compartments, including the systemic and central blood volumes. This blood volume expansion is associated with vasorelaxation, as manifested by suppression of the renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system, initially only when the patient is in the supine position. Acute volume depletion in such patients results in normalisation of the hyperdynamic circulation, whilst acute volume expansion results in exaggerated natriuresis. As liver disease progresses and liver function deteriorates, the systemic hyperdynamic circulation becomes more manifest with activation of the renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system. The presence of vasodilatation in the presence of highly elevated levels of circulating vasoconstrictors may be explained by vascular hyporesponsiveness due to increased levels of vasodilators such as nitric oxide, as well as the development of an autonomic neuropathy. However, vasodilatation is not generalised, but confined to certain vascular beds, such as the splanchnic and pulmonary beds. Even here, the status may change with the natural history of the disease, since even portal blood flow may decrease and become reversed with advanced disease. The failure of these changes to reverse following liver transplantation may be due to remodelling and angiogenesis.

Drug treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices

At the time of diagnosis of cirrhosis, varices are present in about 60% of decompensated and 30% of compensated patients. The risk factors for the first episode of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are the severity of liver dysfunction, a large size of the varices and the presence of endoscopic red colour signs, but only a third of patients who suffer variceal haemorrhage demonstrate the above risk factors. The only treatment that does not require sophisticated equipment or the skills of a specialist, and is immediately available, is vasoactive drug therapy. Hence, drug therapy should be considered to be the initial treatment of choice and can be administered while the patient is transferred to hospital, as has been done in one recent study. Moreover, drug therapy is no longer considered to be only a 'stop-gap' therapy until definitive endoscopic therapy is performed. Several recent trials have reported an efficacy similar to that of emergency sclerotherapy in the control of variceal bleeding. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that those patients with high variceal or portal pressure are likely to continue to bleed or re-bleed early, implying that prolonged therapy lowering the portal pressure over several days may be the optimal treatment. Pharmacological treatment with beta-blockers is safe, effective and the standard long-term treatment for the prevention of recurrence of variceal bleeding. The combination of beta-blockers with isosorbide-5-mononitrate needs further testing in randomized controlled trials. The use of haemodynamic targets for the reduction of the HVPG response needs further study, and surrogate markers of the pressure response need evaluation. Ligation has recently been compared with beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis, but there is as yet no good evidence to recommend banding for primary prophylaxis if beta-blockers can be given.

Esophageal varices. I. Clinical presentation, medical therapy, and endoscopic therapy

The last half century has witnessed great advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of portal hypertension in cirrhotics. Several pharmacologic and endoscopic techniques have been developed for the treatment of portal hypertension. The use of these agents in a given patient must be based on an understanding of the stage in the natural history of the disease and the relative efficacy and safety of the available treatment options.

Long-term follow up of a randomized, controlled trial on prophylactic sclerotherapy of small oesophageal varices in liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

In order to evaluate the prophylactic impact of sclerotherapy of small varices in patients with cirrhosis and no endoscopic signs suggesting risk of haemorrhage, a randomized clinical trial was performed.

METHODS

Seventy-one hospitalized patients met the inclusion criteria of diagnosis of cirrhosis with no previous bleeding and small varices. Due to exclusion criteria of: gastroduodenal ulcers (n = 5), diverticulosis (n = 1), hepatic insufficiency (n = 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4), death before randomization (n = 6), age over 70 (n = 1) and denial of consent to participate in the study (n = 1), 43 patients could be randomized, 21 for sclerotherapy and 22 for the control group. Two patients (one in each group) were lost to follow up, and another patient, although not lost, refused sclerotherapy after randomization. Ethanolamine oleate was used as the sclerosing agent. All patients were followed up for a mean time of 60 months, initially every 2 months for the first 2 years and clinical and endoscopic controls were performed each 6-12 months thereafter.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

During the first 2 years clinical assessment showed that there were five bleedings in the sclerotherapy group and none in the control group, but mortality was similar in both groups. Long-term follow up continued to show a higher prevalence of bleeding in the sclerotherapy group but that mortality was not different from the control group.

Review: pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of portal hypertension

Certain vasoactive substances reduce portal pressure in patients or animals with portal hypertension by either inducing splanchnic vasoconstriction or reducing hepatic vascular resistance. Studies have shown that propranolol or nadolol significantly reduce the risk of a first episode of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and increase the survival rate in patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate is also effective in the prevention of bleeding. The combination of beta-blockers and nitrates may be more effective than one drug alone. These results show that beta-adrenoceptor antagonists must be used to prevent the first episode of GI bleeding. Beta-blocker administration also significantly reduces the risk of recurrent GI bleeding and increases the survival rate in patients with cirrhosis. Studies have shown that propranolol is as effective as endoscopic sclerotherapy. The combination of a beta-blocker with endoscopic sclerotherapy may be more effective than pharmacological or endoscopic treatment alone for the prevention of rebleeding. Finally, new experimental and clinical studies are needed to improve the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension.

Effects of propranolol on intestinal microcirculation of normal and portal hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of locally and systemically administered propranolol in normal and prehepatic portal hypertensive rats, and to test the hypothesis that beta-adrenoceptor blockade reduces intestinal arteriolar diameter by allowing unopposed alpha-adrenergic activity.

METHODS

The small intestine was prepared for in vivo microcirculatory studies and transferred to an intravital microscope where arteriolar diameter and erythrocyte velocity were continuously monitored. First order arteriolar (1A) blood flow was calculated from the product of mean velocity and microvessel cross-sectional area. In separate experiments, diameter responses of 2A and 3A were monitored. Once steady-state conditions were achieved, the preparation was challenged by topically applied doses of propranolol (0.01-100.00 microM) in the presence and absence of the alpha-receptor antagonist, phentolamine. In a separate group of experiments, the effects of systemically administered propranolol (10 mg/kg body weight) were evaluated before and after local alpha-adrenoceptor blockade.

RESULTS

Propranolol produced significant vasoconstriction and decreased blood flow in both normal and portal hypertensive rats. Portal hypertensive arterioles exhibited an attenuated response to propranolol. Local administration of phentolamine completely blocked the propranolol-induced diameter changes. Comparison of equivalent concentrations of local and systemic propranolol indicated that both routes of administration were equally effective.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest that the cardiovascular actions of propranolol are predominantly mediated through blockade of peripheral beta 2-adrenoceptor.

Propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate for portal hypertension in cirrhosis: long-term hemodynamic and renal effects

The effect on kidney function, vasoactive systems and ascites outcome of long-term treatment with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate, a combined therapy proven more effective than propranolol alone in decreasing portal pressure in the cirrhotic patient, is unknown. Thirty cirrhotic patients who survived acute variceal bleeding and were treated with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate were studied. Portal and systemic hemodynamics (n = 15), inulin clearance, free water clearance, plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration and prostaglandin E2 excretion (n = 20) were measured before and after 3 mo of treatment. In addition, data on ascites outcome in the entire series after a mean follow-up of 9.6 mo were compared with those of 30 patients undergoing elective sclerotherapy and with those of 30 patients treated with propranolol alone matched for age, sex, presence of ascites, Child-Pugh class and mean follow-up length included in other randomized controlled trials. Combined therapy significantly decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow. In addition, no changes in inulin clearance, free water clearance, plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration and prostaglandin E2 excretion occurred, despite a mild decrease in mean arterial pressure. Moreover, no differences among the three groups of patients studied in ascites outcome were found. These results suggest that long-term treatment with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate does not impair kidney function, vasoactive systems or ascites outcome in cirrhotic patients.

Beta adrenergic stimulation and blockade in cirrhosis: effects on azygos vein blood flow and portal hemodynamics

It is unknown whether beta adrenergic stress has adverse hepatic hemodynamic effects. Therefore, the authors studied the hemodynamic effects of beta adrenergic stimulation and subsequent blockade in 10 patients with cirrhosis (6 Childs A, 3 Childs B, and 1 Childs C) with known or suspected portal hypertension. Free and wedged hepatic vein pressures, hepatic venous pressure gradient, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and azygos vein blood flow were measured at rest and after isoproterenol infusion (mean dose = 7.3 micrograms/min: target heart rate = 150% to 200% of resting heart rate). Esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta blocker, was then infused (dose titrated to return heart rate to baseline), and all measurements were repeated. Based on the results, the authors conclude that beta adrenergic stress provoked by isoproterenol infusion significantly increases azygos vein blood flow and hepatic venous pressure gradient. Beta blockade with esmolol reduces azygos vein blood flow and hepatic venous pressure gradient significantly below baseline.

Oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate reduces the rebleeding rate during the course of injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices

A double-blind, multicenter trial was carried out to assess the effectiveness of isosorbide-5-mononitrate in preventing recurrent variceal hemorrhage during the course of endoscopic sclerotherapy. Seventy-six patients with their first bleeding episode from esophageal varices were randomly allocated, after initial control of hemorrhage, to groups receiving either 50 mg/day oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate retard (37 patients) or an identical placebo (39 patients) until variceal eradication. Sclerotherapy was performed at weekly intervals, and varices were intra- and para-variceally injected with 1% polidocanol until eradication. If rebleeding occurred, additional sclerotherapy was performed. Four (10.8%) patients rebled in the isosorbide group, compared with 15 (38.4%) in the placebo group (p = 0.01). The total number of rebleeding episodes was also significantly lower in the isosorbide group (5 versus 19, p = 0.043), whereas comparison between major versus minor rebleedings was not significant. The median transfusion requirement per bleeding episode was not significantly different in the two groups, although the cumulative number of blood units transfused was over threefold greater (22 versus 70) in the placebo group. Two (5.4%) deaths occurred among isosorbide-treated patients and nine (17.9%) among placebo patients (NS). The number of sclerotherapy sessions and the time required to obtain variceal eradication were also comparable in the two groups. Finally, the nitrovasodilator was well tolerated, requiring withdrawal for severe headache in only one patient. In conclusion, isosorbide-5-mononitrate reduces the rebleeding rate and the number of rebleeding episodes before variceal eradication in patients treated with sclerotherapy.

Long-term management of variceal bleeding: the place of pharmacotherapy

Portal hypertension is treated by reducing portal pressure in order to prevent esophageal variceal bleeding or recurrent bleeding. Because portal hypertension depends on both elevated portal tributary blood flow and intrahepatic vascular resistance, the pharmacologic therapy of this syndrome consists in reducing portal blood flow or vascular resistance, or both. The pharmacologic prevention of first bleeding or recurrent bleeding has been performed with nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonists (propranolol or nadolol). Certain controlled studies have shown that this type of drug significantly reduces the risk of first bleeding by approximately 40% in patients with esophageal varices. A meta-analysis showed that death due to bleeding was also significantly lower in the beta-blocker group than in the placebo group. Moreover, beta-blockers are effective in patients in both good and poor condition and with all types of cirrhosis. The efficacy of beta-blockers on the risk of recurrent bleeding is less clear, but these substances significantly decrease the risk of rebleeding, by approximately 30%. Recurrent bleeding in patients treated with beta-blockers is associated with the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma or lack of compliance. In conclusion, it is clear that different substances have portal hypotensive effects and can be used to treat or prevent complications of portal hypertension. However, other drugs should be tested, and other clinical studies are needed to identify good responders.

Relation between liver pathology and prognosis in patients with portal hypertension

The most common causes of variceal bleeding are cirrhosis, schistosomiasis, and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. The prognosis for an individual patient depends on the severity of the bleeding episode and the underlying liver function. Liver function is determined to a large extent by the underlying liver pathology. Patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension or cirrhosis with good liver function have good short- and long-term prognoses. In patients with established cirrhosis, the presence of alcoholic hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or portal venous thrombosis may adversely affect prognosis. In addition to affecting prognosis, the underlying pathology may also influence choice of treatment. This point is particularly true for treatments such as shunt surgery, liver transplantation, or transjugular intrahepatic shunts.

Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: hemodynamic effects and prevention of bleeding

In the past 10 years, it has been clearly shown that vasoactive substances reduce portal pressure in patients or animals with portal hypertension. Some of these substances act by inducing splanchnic vasoconstriction, while others reduce hepatic and porto-systemic collateral vascular resistance and, thus, induce a portal hypotensive effect. Still others induce arterial hypotension, which causes a vasoconstrictive effect in the splanchnic territory. Since these drugs act on different vascular receptors, their combination should have a more marked effect on portal hypertension. Up to now, only nonselective beta-blockers have been used in the prevention of first gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices and in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. These trials have shown that propranolol or nadolol significantly reduce either a first episode of bleeding or recurrent bleeding. This pharmacological treatment also improves the survival rate in these patients. All of these studies have helped us to understand, in part, why gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurs in certain patients. Additional studies of beta-blockers or other substances are, nevertheless, necessary to select patients who will respond to this type of treatment. Finally, it is possible that the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension may also be used before esophageal varices occur.

Pathophysiology and prognosis of oesophageal varices

The fundamental initiating factor in portal hypertension is an increase in resistance to portal venous flow. Portal venous pressure rises as a consequence, and collateral channels open to decompress the portal venous system. A number of secondary haemodynamic phenomena occur in animals and humans with portal hypertension. Systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial blood pressure fall and both cardiac output and splanchnic blood flow increase. Current theories suggest that increased vascular production of nitric oxide may have a principal role in the pathogenesis of these secondary haemodynamic changes. The most common causes of variceal bleeding are cirrhosis, schistosomiasis and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Varices develop in 90% of cirrhotic patients if follow-up is long enough. Bleeding from varices occurs in approximately 30% of patients followed up for 2-4 years, with mortality rates of 25% to 50% in those who bled. Prognosis is better in conditions where liver function is preserved, e.g. portal venous obstruction, schistosomiasis, etc.

Propranolol in the prevention of recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing endoscopic sclerotherapy. A randomized controlled trial

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible value of continuous administration of propranolol in the prevention of recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing chronic endoscopic sclerotherapy. Among 239 patients admitted for acute variceal bleeding, 85 with cirrhosis were randomized to receive sclerotherapy either alone (40) or in combination with propranolol (45). Sclerotherapy was carried out with an intravariceal injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate through a fiberoptic endoscope. The procedure was performed every week, until the esophageal varices at the gastroesophageal junction were too small for any further injections. Varices were reinjected if they recurred. Propranolol was given orally twice a day until heart rate was reduced by 25% in the resting position. The mean follow-up period was 23.2 and 24.2 months for sclerotherapy and the sclerotherapy plus propranolol groups, respectively. During this period a significant (P = 0.001) reduction in the recurrence of esophageal varices was observed in patients treated with the combination of sclerotherapy plus propranolol compared with those treated with sclerotherapy alone. However, the time of rebleeding from any source or from esophageal varices did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the sclerotherapy group 21 patients rebled (35 bleeding episodes) compared with 14 (22 episodes) in the combination therapy group. Patients in the sclerotherapy group were more prone to bleed from gastric varices and congestive gastropathy than patients treated with the combination of sclerotherapy plus propranolol (P = 0.012). Twenty-five patients in the endoscopic sclerotherapy group developed complications attributed to sclerotherapy compared with 23 patients in the sclerotherapy plus propranolol group. Complications directly attributable to propranolol were observed in 11 patients. Three of these patients stopped taking the drug due to heart failure (1) and flapping tremor (2). Eight patients (17.8%) died in the latter group while the corresponding figure in the sclerotherapy group was nine (22.5%). It is concluded that the continuous administration of propranolol may reduce incidences of recurrent upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from gastric sources in patients with cirrhosis undergoing chronic sclerotherapy.

Propranolol compared with propranolol plus isosorbide dinitrate in portal-hypertensive patients: long-term hemodynamic and renal effects

The long-term hemodynamic and renal effects of propranolol were compared with those of propranolol plus isosorbide dinitrate in 44 portal-hypertensive alcoholic cirrhotic patients. Eight control patients, 8 patients receiving propranolol and 14 patients receiving propranolol plus isosorbide dinitrate were hemodynamically evaluated. Renal function was studied in a fourth group of 14 patients receiving propranolol plus isosorbide dinitrate. Portal pressure decreased more (p < 0.05) with combined therapy (-21.6%, from 19.5 +/- 4.8 to 15.4 +/- 4.3 mm Hg) than with propranolol alone (-12.5%, from 19.9 +/- 1.2 to 17.4 +/- 1.8 mm Hg). Serum urea and creatinine levels, plasma sodium concentration, urine volume and urinary sodium excretion showed nonsignificant changes in all groups studied. Combined therapy induced a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in plasma renin activity (from 4.42 +/- 4.7 to 1.59 +/- 1.9 ng/ml/hr) and nonsignificant reductions in plasma aldosterone concentration and creatinine clearance. None of the eight patients with ascites or history of ascites not receiving isosorbide dinitrate showed evidence of impairment in renal sodium metabolism during the study period. In contrast, 8 of the 14 patients (57%) with ascites or history of ascites receiving isosorbide dinitrate showed impairment in renal sodium metabolism (p < 0.01), as reflected by the development or worsening of ascites and the need of higher diuretic requirements. Long-term combined administration of propranolol plus isosorbide dinitrate is superior to propranolol alone in the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacologic prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding

A review of nine placebo-controlled studies for the prevention of first bleeding and 14 for the prevention of rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices indicates that beta-adrenergic antagonists significantly reduced the incidence of both initial and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding over study durations ranging from 1 to 2 years, provided the patients complied with the regimen. Three meta-analyses concluded that beta-blockers also significantly reduced the risk of fatal bleeding, although this remains controversial. These agents were also effective in patients with portal hypertension from causes other than alcoholic cirrhosis, although not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Side effects occurred in 3-40% of patients and required discontinuation of beta-blocker administration in 5%. In two clinical trials in which beta-blocker therapy was compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy, the drug was at least as effective as sclerotherapy in preventing first episodes of variceal bleeding. In nine studies, the two modalities were comparably effective in preventing rebleeding. Used in combination, beta-blockers and sclerotherapy were more effective in preventing rebleeding than either used alone. However, neither treatment unequivocally prolonged survival relative to placebo.

Portal hypertension and bleeding esophageal varices

Bleeding from esophageal varices exacts a high mortality and extraordinary societal costs. Prophylaxis--medication, sclerotherapy, or shunt surgery to prevent an initial bleeding episode--is ineffective. In patients who have bled from varices, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy can control acute bleeding in more than 90% of patients. Because recurrent bleeding frequently occurs and survival without definitive therapy is dismal, selection of a permanently effective treatment is mandatory once variceal bleeding has been controlled. Long-term injection sclerotherapy can be performed in compliant patients; it is relatively safe but is associated with a 30-50% rebleeding rate. Beta-blockers significantly reduce portal pressure and recurrent bleeding but have not been shown to diminish mortality from BEV. Portal decompressive surgery permanently halts bleeding in more than 90% of patients; the risk of operative mortality is high in decompensated cirrhotics, and long-term complications of encephalopathy and accelerated liver failure may limit indications for shunt surgery to good-risk cirrhotics who are not liver transplant candidates. Devascularization procedures have a low operative mortality and encephalopathy rate but unacceptably high rates of recurrent bleeding. Liver transplantation is curative therapy for bleeding esophageal varices and the associated underlying hepatic dysfunction; cost and availability of donor organs generally limit its use in this setting to variceal bleeders with end-stage liver disease not associated with active alcoholism.

Effect of propranolol on urinary prostaglandin E2 excretion and renal interlobar arterial blood flow after furosemide administration in patients with hepatic cirrhosis

The effect of propranolol on furosemide-stimulated urinary prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) excretion and renal blood flow was evaluated in 12 patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Plasma and urine were collected before and 60 min after furosemide 20 mgI with or without propranolol pretreatment, and plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), urinary excretion of PGE2 and sodium were determined. The renal interlobar arterial Pulsatility Index (PI), as an index of resistance to blood flow, was also determined before and 60 min after furosemide administration with and without propranolol pretreatment, by using a duplex Doppler ultrasound (Hitachi EUB 565). Urine volume and sodium excretion after furosemide administration were not influenced by the propranolol pretreatment. Furosemide administration significantly increased urinary PGE2 excretion, PRA and PAC, and these effects were significantly reduced by propranolol. Furosemide administration with or without propranolol significantly reduced renal interlobar arterial PI, the average reduction in PI being significantly lower after furosemide administration with propranolol pretreatment. The results demonstrate that propranolol pretreatment significantly influenced the furosemide-induced increase in urinary PGE2 excretion and renal interlobar arterial blood flow in cirrhotic patients.