Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on bile acid metabolism in primary biliary cirrhosis

Pharmacological interventions for primary biliary cholangitis: an attempted network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (previously primary biliary cirrhosis) is a chronic liver disease caused by the destruction of small intra-hepatic bile ducts resulting in stasis of bile (cholestasis), liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis. The optimal pharmacological treatment of primary biliary cholangitis remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the available pharmacological interventions according to their safety and efficacy. However, it was not possible to assess whether the potential effect modifiers were similar across different comparisons. Therefore, we did not perform the network meta-analysis, and instead, assessed the comparative benefits and harms of different interventions using standard Cochrane methodology.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and randomised controlled trials registers to February 2017 to identify randomised clinical trials on pharmacological interventions for primary biliary cholangitis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in participants with primary biliary cholangitis. We excluded trials which included participants who had previously undergone liver transplantation. We considered any of the various pharmacological interventions compared with each other or with placebo or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models based on available-participant analysis with Review Manager 5. We assessed risk of bias according to Cochrane, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 74 trials including 5902 participants that met the inclusion criteria of this review. A total of 46 trials (4274 participants) provided information for one or more outcomes. All the trials were at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Overall, all the evidence was low or very low quality. The proportion of participants with symptoms varied from 19.9% to 100% in the trials that reported this information. The proportion of participants who were antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) positive ranged from 80.8% to 100% in the trials that reported this information. It appeared that most trials included participants who had not received previous treatments or included participants regardless of the previous treatments received. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 1 to 96 months.The proportion of people with mortality (maximal follow-up) was higher in the methotrexate group versus the no intervention group (OR 8.83, 95% CI 1.01 to 76.96; 60 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). The proportion of people with mortality (maximal follow-up) was lower in the azathioprine group versus the no intervention group (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.98; 224 participants; 2 trials; I2 = 0%; low quality evidence). However, it has to be noted that a large proportion of participants (25%) was excluded from the trial that contributed most participants to this analysis and the results were not reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in any of the remaining comparisons. The proportion of people with serious adverse events was higher in the D-penicillamine versus no intervention group (OR 28.77, 95% CI 1.57 to 526.67; 52 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). The proportion of people with serious adverse events was higher in the obeticholic acid plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) group versus the UDCA group (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.02 to 12.51; 216 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in any of the remaining comparisons for serious adverse events (proportion) or serious adverse events (number of events). None of the trials reported health-related quality of life at any time point.

FUNDING

nine trials had no special funding or were funded by hospital or charities; 31 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies; and 34 trials provided no information on source of funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on very low quality evidence, there is currently no evidence that any intervention is beneficial for primary biliary cholangitis. However, the follow-up periods in the trials were short and there is significant uncertainty in this issue. Further well-designed randomised clinical trials are necessary. Future randomised clinical trials ought to be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid post-randomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; should have sufficient follow-up period (e.g. five or 10 years or more); and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, health-related quality of life, cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and liver transplantation. Alternatively, very large groups of participants should be randomised to facilitate shorter trial duration.

Long-Term Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy Does Not Alter Lithocholic Acid Levels in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis with Associated Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the fasting and postprandial serum bile acid composition in patients with cystic fibrosis-associated liver disease (CFLD) after chronic administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (20 mg/kg/day). The aim was to specifically focus on the extent of biotransformation of UDCA to its hepatotoxic metabolite, lithocholic acid, because of recent concerns regarding the safety of long-term, high-dose UDCA treatment for CFLD.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty patients with CFLD (median age 16 years, range: 2.4-35.0) prescribed UDCA therapy for at least 2 years were studied. Total and individual serum bile acids were measured by stable-isotope dilution mass spectrometry, in fasting and 2-hour postprandial samples taken during chronic UDCA (20 mg/kg/day) administration.

RESULTS

During chronic UDCA administration (median duration 8 years, IQR: 6-16), UDCA became the predominant serum bile acid in all patients (median, IQR: 3.17, 1.25-5.56 μmol/L) and chenodeoxycholic acid concentrations were greater than cholic acid (1.86, 1.00-4.70 μmol/L vs 0.40, 0.24-2.71 μmol/L). The secondary bile acids, deoxycholate and lithocholate, were present in very low concentrations in fasted serum (<0.05 μmol/L). After UDCA administration, 2-hour postprandial concentrations of both UDCA and chenodeoxycholic acid significantly increased (P < .01), but no significant changes in serum lithocholic acid concentrations were observed.

CONCLUSION

These data do not support recent suggestions that enhanced biotransformation of UDCA to the hepatotoxic secondary bile acid lithocholic occurs when patients with CFLD are treated with relatively high doses of UDCA.

The mucosa-associated microbiota of PSC patients is characterized by low diversity and low abundance of uncultured Clostridiales II

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a cholestatic liver disease that is strongly associated with a particular phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with right-sided colonic involvement. In IBD, several studies demonstrated significant aberrancies in the intestinal microbiota in comparison with healthy controls. We aimed to explore the link between IBD and PSC by studying the intestinal mucosa-adherent microbiota in PSC and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and noninflammatory controls.

METHODS

We included 12 PSC patients, 11 UC patients, and nine noninflammatory controls. The microbiota composition was determined in ileocecal biopsies from each patient by 16S rRNA-based analyses using the human intestinal tract chip.

RESULTS

Profiling of the mucosa-adherent microbiota of PSC patients, UC patients, and noninflammatory controls revealed that these groups did not cluster separately based on microbiota composition. At the genus-like level, the relative abundance of uncultured Clostridiales II was significantly lower (almost 2-fold) in PSC (0.26 ± 0.10%) compared with UC (0.41 ± 0.29%) and controls (0.49 ± 0.25%) (p = 0.02). Diversity and richness in the microbiota composition differed across the groups and were significantly lower in PSC patients compared with noninflammatory controls (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found in evenness.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced amounts of uncultured Clostridiales II in PSC biopsies in comparison with UC and healthy controls can be considered a signature of a compromised gut, as we have recently observed that this group of as yet uncultured Firmicutes correlates significantly with health.

Prospective evaluation of ursodeoxycholic acid withdrawal in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is no longer recommended for management of adult patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We undertook a prospective evaluation of UDCA withdrawal in a group of consecutive patients with PSC. Twenty six patients, all treated with UDCA (dose range: 10-15 mg/kg/day) were included. Paired blood samples for liver biochemistry, bile acids, and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) were collected before UDCA withdrawal and 3 months later. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry was used for quantification of 29 plasma bile acid metabolites. Pruritus and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed with a 10-point numeric rating scale, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), and PBC-40 questionnaires. UDCA withdrawal resulted in a significant deterioration in liver biochemistry (increase of alkaline phosphatase of 75.6%; P<0.0001; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase of 117.9%, P<0.0001; bilirubin of 50.0%, P<0.001; alanine aminotransferase of 63.9%, P<0.005; and aspartate aminotransferase of 45.0%, P<0.005) and increase of Mayo Risk Score for PSC (change from baseline of +0.5 point; P<0.003). Bile acid analysis revealed a significant decrease in lithocholic acid and its derivatives after UDCA withdrawal, but no effect on concentrations of primary bile acids aside from an increased accumulation of their taurine conjugates. After UDCA removal cholestatic parameters, taurine species of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid correlated with serum FGF19 levels. No significant effect on HRQoL after UDCA withdrawal was observed; however, 42% of patients reported a deterioration in their pruritus.

CONCLUSION

At 3 months, discontinuation of UDCA in patients with PSC causes significant deterioration in liver biochemistry and influences concentrations of bile acid metabolites. A proportion of patients report increased pruritus, but other short-term markers of quality of life are unaffected.

Improved survival with ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: long-term follow-up of a randomized study

We report the long-term results of a prospective randomized study on the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for prevention of hepatic complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Two hundred forty-two patients, 232 with malignant disease, were randomized to receive (n = 123) or not to receive (n = 119) UDCA from the beginning of the conditioning until 90 days post-transplantation. The results were reported after 1-year follow-up. UDCA administration reduced significantly the proportion of patients developing high serum bilirubin levels as well as the incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), liver GVHD, and intestinal GVHD. In the UDCA prophylaxis group, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was lower and overall survival better than in the control group. After a 10-year follow-up, the difference in the survival and NRM in favor of the UDCA-treated group, seen at 1 year, was maintained (survival 48% versus 38%, P = .037; NRM 28% versus 41%, P = .01). A landmark analysis in patients surviving at 1 year post-transplantation showed no significant differences between the study groups in the long-term follow-up in chronic GVHD, relapse rate, NRM, disease-free survival, or overall survival. These long-term results continue to support the useful role of UDCA in the prevention of transplant-related complications in allogeneic transplantation.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid is administered to patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, a chronic progressive inflammatory autoimmune-mediated liver disease with unknown aetiology. Despite its controversial effects, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved its usage for primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for eligible randomised trials in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The literature search was performed until January 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing the beneficial and harmful effects of ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo or 'no intervention' in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data. Continuous data were analysed using mean difference (MD) and standardised mean difference (SMD). Dichotomous data were analysed using risk ratio (RR). Meta-analyses were conducted using both a random-effects model and a fixed-effect model, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects model meta-regression was used to assess the effects of covariates across the trials. Trial sequential analysis was used to assess risk of random errors (play of chance). Risks of bias (systematic error) in the included trials were assessed according to Cochrane methodology bias domains.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen randomised clinical trials with 1447 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were included. One trial had low risk of bias, and the remaining fifteen had high risk of bias. Fourteen trials compared ursodeoxycholic acid with placebo and two trials compared ursodeoxycholic acid with 'no intervention'. The percentage of patients with advanced primary biliary cirrhosis at baseline varied from 15% to 83%, with a median of 51%. The duration of the trials varied from 3 to 92 months, with a median of 24 months. The results showed no significant difference in effect between ursodeoxycholic acid and placebo or 'no intervention' on all-cause mortality (45/699 (6.4%) versus 46/692 (6.6%); RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42, I² = 0%; 14 trials); on all-cause mortality or liver transplantation (86/713 (12.1%) versus 89/706 (12.6%); RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.25, I² = 15%; 15 trials); on serious adverse events (94/695 (13.5%) versus 107/687 (15.6%); RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.12, I² = 23%; 14 trials); or on non-serious adverse events (27/643 (4.2%) versus 18/634 (2.8%); RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.56, I² = 0%; 12 trials). The random-effects model meta-regression showed that the risk of bias of the trials, disease severity of patients at entry, ursodeoxycholic acid dosage, and trial duration were not significantly associated with the intervention effects on all-cause mortality, or on all-cause mortality or liver transplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid did not influence the number of patients with pruritus (168/321 (52.3%) versus 166/309 (53.7%); RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.09, I² = 0%; 6 trials) or with fatigue (170/252 (64.9%) versus 174/244 (71.3%); RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.00, I² = 62%; 4 trials). Two trials reported the number of patients with jaundice and showed a significant effect of ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo or no intervention in a fixed-effect meta-analysis (5/99 (5.1%) versus 15/99 (15.2%); RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.90, I² = 51%; 2 trials). The result was not supported by the random-effects meta-analysis (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.06 to 4.95). Portal pressure, varices, bleeding varices, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy were not significantly affected by ursodeoxycholic acid. Ursodeoxycholic acid significantly decreased serum bilirubin concentration (MD -8.69 µmol/l, 95% CI -13.90 to -3.48, I² = 0%; 881 patients; 9 trials) and activity of serum alkaline phosphatases (MD -257.09 U/L, 95% CI -306.25 to -207.92, I² = 0%; 754 patients, 9 trials) compared with placebo or no intervention. These results were supported by trial sequential analysis. Ursodeoxycholic acid also seemed to improve serum levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase, aminotransferases, total cholesterol, and plasma immunoglobulin M concentration. Ursodeoxycholic acid seemed to have a beneficial effect on worsening of histological stage (random; 66/281 (23.5%) versus 103/270 (38.2%); RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, I² = 35%; 7 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review did not demonstrate any significant benefits of ursodeoxycholic acid on all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or liver transplantation, pruritus, or fatigue in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid seemed to have a beneficial effect on liver biochemistry measures and on histological progression compared with the control group. All but one of the included trials had high risk of bias, and there are risks of outcome reporting bias and risks of random errors as well. Randomised trials with low risk of bias and low risks of random errors examining the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis are needed.

In PSC with colitis treated with UDCA, most colonic carcinomas develop in the first years after the start of treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients with PSC and IBD have a high incidence of colonic carcinomas (CRC), and the annual incidence of CRC increases with duration of disease. UDCA treatment has been suggested to reduce colonic dysplasias and carcinomas.

AIMS

The annual incidence of colorectal carcinomas after long-term UDCA treatment was studied.

METHODS

Patients included in a prospective study on the outcome after ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 120 of 171 PSC patients included had IBD (108 UC and 12 CD). All patients were treated with UDCA for a median time of 6.7 years. Seven patients with PSC and IBD developed a CRC yielding a prevalence of 5.8%. In years 0-3 (n = 120) after the start of UDCA, the annual incidence rate of CRC was 0.62/100 patient years; in years 3-6 (n = 93) it increased to 1.28 and decreased thereafter in years 6-9 (n = 67) to 1.17, then in years 9-12 (n = 42) to 0 and after >12 years (n = 24) it remained 0. In PSC with IBD, Kaplan-Meier estimate of CRC formation increased with time in the first years of treatment and reached a plateau after 9 years; after treatment for ≥ 9 years, no further CRC were observed.

CONCLUSION

After the start of UDCA, the annual incidence of CRC increased up to 6 years and subsequently decreased. In PSC with IBD treated with UDCA, most colonic carcinomas develop in the first years after the start of treatment.

Bile acid changes after high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Relation to disease progression

High-dose (28-30 mg/kg/day) ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves serum liver tests in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) but does not improve survival and is associated with increased rates of serious adverse events. The mechanism for the latter undesired effect remains unclear. High-dose UDCA could result in the production of hepatotoxic bile acids, such as lithocholic acid (LCA), because of limited small bowel absorption of UDCA and conversion of UDCA by bacteria in the colon. We determined the serum bile acid composition in 56 patients with PSC previously enrolled in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of high-dose UDCA versus placebo. Samples for analysis were obtained at the baseline and at the end of treatment. The mean changes in the UDCA level (16.86 versus 0.05 micromol/L) and total bile acid level (17.21 versus -0.55 micromol/L) were significantly higher in the UDCA group (n = 29) versus the placebo group (n = 27) when pretreatment levels were compared (P < 0.0001). LCA was also markedly increased (0.22 versus 0.01 micromol/L) in the UDCA group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.001). No significant changes were detected for cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, or chenodeoxycholic acid. Patients (n = 9) in the UDCA group who reached clinical endpoints of disease progression (the development of cirrhosis, varices, liver transplantation, or death) tended to have greater increases in their posttreatment total bile acid levels (34.99 versus 9.21 micromol/L, P < 0.08) in comparison with those who did not.

CONCLUSION

High-dose UDCA treatment in PSC patients results in marked UDCA enrichment and significant expansion of the total serum bile acid pool, including LCA.

Current understanding of osteoporosis associated with liver disease

Osteoporosis is a common complication of many types of liver disease. Research into the pathogenesis of osteoporosis has revealed that the mechanisms of bone loss differ between different types of liver disease. This Review summarizes our current understanding of osteoporosis associated with liver disease and the new advances that have been made in this field. The different mechanisms by which cholestatic and parenchymal liver disease can lead to reduced bone mass, the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with early and advanced liver disease, and the influence of osteoporotic fractures on patient survival are discussed along with the advances in our understanding of the molecular pathways associated with bone loss. The role of the CSF1-RANKL system and that of the liver molecule, oncofetal fibronectin, a protein that has traditionally been viewed as an extracellular matrix protein are also discussed. The potential impact that these advances may have for the treatment of osteoporosis associated with liver disease is also reviewed.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is an uncommon autoimmune liver disease with unknown aetiology. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been used for primary biliary cirrhosis, but the effects remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of UDCA on patients with primary biliary cirrhosis against placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCI-EXPANDED, The Chinese Biomedical CD Database, LILACS, and the references of identified studies. The last search was performed in January 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials evaluating UDCA versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as weighted mean difference, all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression was used to investigate the associations between UDCA effects and quality of the trial, UDCA dose, trial duration, and patient's severity of primary biliary cirrhosis. We also used Bayesian meta-analytic approach to estimate the UDCA effect as sensitivity analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen randomised clinical trials evaluating UDCA against placebo or no intervention were identified. Data from three trials have been updated. Nearly half of the trials had high risk of bias. The combined results demonstrated no significant effects favouring UDCA on mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42) and mortality or liver transplantation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.21). The findings were supported by the Bayesian meta-analyses. UDCA did not improve pruritus, fatigue, autoimmune conditions, liver histology, or portal pressure. UDCA seemed to improve biochemical variables, like serum bilirubin, ascites, and jaundice, but the findings were based on few trials with sparse data. The use of UDCA is significantly associated with adverse events, mainly weight gain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review did not demonstrate any benefit of UDCA on mortality and mortality or liver transplantation of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The few beneficial effects could not be due to random errors or outcome reporting bias.

Bile acids for viral hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Trials have assessed bile acids for patients with viral hepatitis, but no consensus has been reached regarding their usefulness.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for viral hepatitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were performed in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (July 2007), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (July 2007), EMBASE (July 2007), Science Citation Index Expanded (July 2007), and Chinese Biomedical Database (July 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo or no intervention for viral hepatitis were included, irrespective of language, publication status, or blinding. Co-interventions were allowed in the included randomised clinical trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted the data independently. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 29 randomised trials of bile acids for hepatitis B or C; none were of high methodological quality. We were unable to extract data from two trials. In one trial, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo for acute hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity at the end of treatment and serum HBV DNA level at the end of follow-up. In another trial, UDCA versus no intervention for chronic hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of having abnormal serum transaminase activities at the end of treatment. Twenty-five trials compared bile acids (21 trials UDCA; four trials tauro-UDCA) versus placebo or no intervention with or without co-interventions for chronic hepatitis C. Bile acids did not significantly reduce the risk of having detectable serum HCV RNA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07), cirrhosis, or portal and periportal inflammation score at the end of treatment. Bile acids significantly decreased the risk of having abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90) and follow-up (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98). Bile acids significantly increased the Knodell score (WMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.31) at the end of treatment. No severe adverse events were reported. We did not identify trials including patients with hepatitis A, acute hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or hepatitis E.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Bile acids lead to a significant improvement in serum transaminase activities in hepatitis B and C but have no effects on the clearance of virus. There is insufficient evidence either to support or to refute effects on long-term outcomes including hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic decompensation, and liver related mortality. Randomised trials with high methodological quality are required before clinical use is considered.

Effect of colitis and ileoanal pouch on biliary enrichment of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis

In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), biliary enrichment of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may represent the decisive factor for its presumable beneficial effect. Up to now it is not clear how colitis and colectomy with ileo-anal pouch affect the biliary enrichment of UDCA and the biliary bile acid composition. We determined the biliary bile acid composition in 63 patients with PSC including 7 patients with ileo-anal pouch, 31 patients with colitis, and 25 patients without colitis. No differences existed between patients with and those without colitis. In patients with colectomy and pouch at a UDCA dose of 17.7 +/- 1.6 mg/kg (n = 7), biliary UDCA represented 46.4 +/- 6.7% (mean +/- SD) of total bile acids. An increase in the dose in six pouch patients from 12.5 +/- 0.9 to 22.3 +/- 1.6 mg/kg led to a slight increase in biliary enrichment of UDCA, from 39.8 +/- 8.1 to 49.4 +/- 10.7%. In five of seven patients with ileo-anal pouch, biliary UDCA enrichment was within the normal range, and in two of seven it was permanently or intermittently abnormally low. During UDCA treatment, in pouch patients the biliary content of deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid was reduced, whereas all other bile acids were unchanged. In a minority of patients with ileo-anal pouch, biliary enrichment of UDCA may be markedly reduced, whereas patients with colitis have a biliary UDCA enrichment not different from that of patient without colitis.

Effect of high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid on its biliary enrichment in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has beneficial effects in cholestatic liver diseases. In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), there is evidence that high doses (+/- 20 mg/kg) of UDCA may be more effective than average doses. Biliary enrichment of UDCA at such high doses may represent the decisive factor for its beneficial effect. Up to now it is not clear how high-dose UDCA correlates with its biliary enrichment and whether bacterial degradation of large amounts of UDCA may lead to an increased bacterial formation of more toxic hydrophobic bile acids. We determined the biliary bile acid composition in 56 patients with PSC including 30 patients with repeat bile samples treated with various doses of UDCA. At a UDCA dose of 10-13 mg/kg/d (n = 18) biliary UDCA represented 43.1% + 0.3% (mean + SD) of total bile acids; at a UDCA dose of 14-17 mg/kg (n = 14), its biliary content increased to 46.9% + 0.3%, at 18-21 mg/kg (n = 34) to 55.9% + 0.2%, at 22-25 mg/kg (n = 12) to 58.6% + 2.3%, and at 26-32 mg/kg (n = 8) to 57.7% + 0.4%. During UDCA treatment, the biliary content of all other bile acids was unchanged or decreased. In conclusion, biliary enrichment of UDCA increases with increasing dose and reaches a plateau at 22-25 mg/kg. There was no increase of toxic hydrophobic bile acids. If biliary enrichment of UDCA represents the decisive factor for its clinical effect, it seems likely that UDCA doses of up to 22-25 mg/kg may be more effective than lower doses.

Bile acids for viral hepatitis

BACKGROUND

The viral hepatitides are common causes of liver diseases globally. Trials have assessed bile acids for patients with viral hepatitis, but no consensus was reached regarding their usefulness.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for viral hepatitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were performed of the trial registers of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (September 2002), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (September 2002), EMBASE (September 2002), and The Chinese Biomedical Database (April 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo or no intervention for viral hepatitis were included, irrespective of language, publication status, or blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted the data independently. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 27 randomised trials of bile acids for hepatitis B or C; none were of high methodological quality. In one trial, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo for acute hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity at the end of treatment and serum HBV DNA level at the end of follow-up. In another trial, UDCA versus no intervention for chronic hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of having abnormal serum transaminase activities at the end of treatment. Twenty-five trials compared bile acids (21 trials UDCA; four trials tauro-UDCA) versus placebo or no intervention with or without co-interventions for chronic hepatitis C. Bile acids did not significantly reduce the risk of having detectable serum HCV RNA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07), cirrhosis, or portal and periportal inflammation score at the end of treatment. Bile acids significantly decreased the risk of having abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90) and follow-up (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98). Bile acids significantly increased the Knodell score (WMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.31) at the end of treatment. No severe adverse events were reported. We did not identify trials including patients with hepatitis A, acute C, D, or E.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Bile acids lead to a significant improvement in serum transaminase activities in hepatitis B and C. There is insufficient evidence either to support or to refute effects on viral markers, mortality, incidence of cirrhosis, or liver histology. Trials with high methodological quality are required.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for the prevention of hepatic complications in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The role of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the prevention of hepatic complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation was studied in a prospective randomized open-label multicenter trial. A total of 242 patients were allocated to receive (n = 123) or not to receive (n = 119) UDCA in the dose of 12 mg/kg/d orally from the day preceding the conditioning until day 90 after transplantation. In the UDCA-treated group a significantly smaller proportion of patients developed a serum bilirubin level exceeding 50 microM (18 of 123 versus 31 of 119, P =.04), and similarly a smaller proportion of patients exceeded the alanine aminotransferase level of 100 U/L. There was no difference in the incidence of veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Compared to the control group, in the UDCA-treated group there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower overall incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and a significantly lower incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD (5 of 123 versus 17 of 119, P =.01), stage II to IV liver and intestinal GVHD, and stage III to IV skin GVHD. There was no difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD or in the relapse rate. Among the patients given UDCA, the survival at 1 year was significantly better, 71% versus 55% (P =.02), and the nonrelapse mortality rate was lower, 19% versus 34% (P =.01), than in the control group. There were significantly more deaths in GVHD in the control group. In conclusion, UDCA administration reduced hepatic problems and severe acute GVHD and improved survival. These results suggest a role for UDCA in the prevention of transplant-related complications in allogeneic transplantation.

Intestinal absorption and biliary secretion of ursodeoxycholic acid and its taurine conjugate

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and its taurine conjugate (TUDCA) exert a protective effect in cholestatic liver diseases. A greater hepatoprotective effect of TUDCA has been suggested. Absorption appears to be a limiting factor and up to now has not been studied in man.

METHODS

We studied absorption and biliary bile acid secretion and composition after administration of UDCA and TUDCA in patients who had complete extrahepatic biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma but had no intestinal or liver disease. After 5 days of intact enterohepatic circulation eight patients with a percutaneous biliary-duodenal drainage received, during two study periods, 1000 mg (1916.9 micromol; mean 29.6 micromol kg(-1)) TUDCA and 750 mg (1910.4 micromol; mean 29.5 micromol kg(-1)) UDCA in random order. Each patient served as his own control.

RESULTS

After UDCA and TUDCA administration the biliary UDCA content increased to 55.2% and 54.6% of total bile acids, respectively (not significant). Biliary secretion of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids remained unchanged whereas that of lithocholic acid increased slightly. A total of 64.6% of the orally administered TUDCA and 55.1% of the UDCA was absorbed (not significant). After TUDCA administration, biliary UDCA was preferentially (95.4%) taurine-conjugated whereas after UDCA administration biliary UDCA was mainly (79.8%) glycine-conjugated.

CONCLUSIONS

After oral administration of TUDCA and UDCA, no significant differences in their absorption and in biliary bile acid secretion exist. Whether biliary enrichment with taurine conjugates of UDCA instead of glycine conjugates offers advantages in the treatment of cholestatic liver disease is unclear at present.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a rare autoimmune liver disease and an effective treatment has been difficult to establish. Some randomised clinical trials have found an effect of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the beneficial effects and adverse effects of peroral ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis versus placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Controlled Trials Register of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the full text of the identified studies were searched until April 2001. The electronic searches were done by entering the search terms 'ursodeoxycholic acid', 'UDCA', 'primary biliary cirrhosis', and 'PBC'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid administered perorally at any dose versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis diagnosed by any method. Only trials using an adequate method for randomisation were included, regardless of blinding and language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodologic quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components and the Jadad-score. The following outcomes were extracted: mortality, liver transplantation, pruritus, other clinical symptoms (jaundice, portal pressure, (bleeding) oesophageal varices, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepato-renal syndrome, autoimmune conditions), liver biochemistry, liver function, liver biopsy findings, quality of life, and adverse events. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 16 randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid against placebo (n = 15) or no intervention (n = 1) in 1422 patients were identified. The median Jadad-score was 3 (range 1-5). A number of trials described as double blind had problems with the blinding. Neither mortality (odds ratio = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.48), liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.32), mortality or liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.26), pruritus, fatigue, autoimmune conditions, quality of life, liver histology, or portal pressure were significantly affected by ursodeoxycholic acid (given in doses of 8-15 mg/kg/day for three months to five years). However, ursodeoxycholic acid significantly (P < 0.05) reduced ascites, jaundice, and biochemical variables such as serum bilirubin and liver enzymes. Ursodeoxycholic acid was not significantly associated with adverse events. Including data after patients had been switched onto open label ursodeoxycholic acid confirmed the findings regarding the lack of a significant effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. A significant (P = 0.04) effect was, however, observed on the incidence of liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.68; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.98).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Ursodeoxycholic acid has a marginal therapeutic effect for primary biliary cirrhosis. On the positive side, ursodeoxycholic acid has few side effects. The general usage of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis needs reevaluation.

3beta-hydroxy-delta5 -C27-steroid dehydrogenase deficiency: diagnosis and treatment

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of bile acid treatment and to obtain further information about the pathway of bile acid biosynthesis in a patient with 3beta-hydroxy-delta5-C27-steroid dehydrogenase/isomerase (3beta-HSD) deficiency by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results showed that at 2 months of age, 3beta-hydroxy-5-cholen-24-oic acid (3.0 micromol/mmol Cr, 7.9%) was detected in the urine in essentially the same relative amount as 3beta,7alpha-dihydroxy- and 3beta,7alpha,12alpha-trihydroxy-5-cholen-24-oic acids (3.7 micromol/mmol Cr, 9.8%) during ursodeoxycholic acid treatment combined with prednisolone. As a result, diagnosis was delayed until 18 months of age. One month later with substitution of chenodeoxycholic acid treatment, urinary 3beta,7alpha-dihydroxy- and 3beta,7alpha,12alpha-trihydroxy-5-cholen-24-oic acids decreased significantly, and subsequent improvement of liver dysfunction was accelerated. Chenodeoxycholic acid treatment is useful in 3beta-HSD deficiency. However, in the diagnosis of this disease in early life, it should be noted that the acidic pathway may be the major route for bile acid biosynthesis in the neonatal period. Diagnosis of 3beta-HSD deficiency may have been delayed by administration of ursodeoxycholic acid, resulting in prolonged diagnostic investigation in this child with cholestasis. Further, use of prednisolone may have been contraindicated.

Ursodeoxycholic acid as adjunctive therapy for problematic type 1 autoimmune hepatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled treatment trial

To evaluate the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid as adjunctive therapy in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, 37 patients who had experienced treatment failure, repeated relapse, or incomplete response were randomized to ursodeoxycholic acid (13-15 mg/kg daily) or placebo for 6 months in addition to their usual corticosteroid schedule. Serum aspartate transaminase (70% vs. 31%, P =.04) and alkaline phosphatase (47% vs. 7%, P =.02) levels improved more commonly in the 21 patients randomized to ursodeoxycholic acid. Mean serum levels, however, were similar before and after the treatment period. The frequency of dose reduction or corticosteroid withdrawal was comparable in both groups (29% versus 31%, P >.9), and clinical improvement (48% vs. 44%, P >.9) or its absence (52% vs. 56%, P >.9) occurred as commonly in patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo. The modified histological activity score (3.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 3. 5 +/- 0.9) and the modified fibrosis score (2.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4) were similar before and after treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and no different than after placebo therapy. We conclude that ursodeoxycholic acid can improve certain laboratory tests in problematic patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis when administered adjunctively for 6 months. Short-term therapy, however, does not facilitate reduction in the dose of corticosteroids or its withdrawal, affect clinical outcome, or reduce histological activity.

Review article: mechanisms of action and therapeutic applications of ursodeoxycholic acid in chronic liver diseases

Ursodeoxycholic acid (ursodiol) is a non-toxic, hydrophilic bile acid used to treat predominantly cholestatic liver disorders. Better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of ursodeoxycholic acid has helped to elucidate its cytoprotective, anti-apoptotic, immunomodulatory and choleretic effects. Ursodeoxycholic acid prolongs survival in primary biliary cirrhosis and it improves biochemical parameters of cholestasis in various other cholestatic disorders including primary sclerosing cholangitis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, cystic fibrosis and total parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis. However, a positive effect on survival remains to be established in these diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid is of unproven efficacy in non-cholestatic disorders such as acute rejection after liver transplantation, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis. This review outlines the present knowledge of the modes of action of ursodeoxycholic acid, and presents data from clinical trials on its use in chronic liver diseases.

Mechanism of hepatoprotective action of bile salts in liver disease

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver enzymes and in many instances liver histology in cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Besides classic cholestatic diseases, UDCA also improves liver biochemistry in alcoholic liver disease and in chronic viral hepatitis C. The main target of UDCA treatment, however, is cholestasis, and consequently the mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effects in these diseases are of interest, and are discussed in detail in this article.

Bile acid abnormalities in cholestatic liver diseases

There is ample reason to believe that UDCA is the drug of choice in cholestatic liver diseases. It is possible that UDCA has to be administered for prolonged periods to see appreciable reversal in liver damage. Nevertheless, the amelioration of symptoms and improvement in nutrition of patients are equally important. Disabling symptoms such as pruritus are often brought under control, and quality of life improves. Clearly the goal for UDCA therapy is to slow the rate of disease progression, lessen the mortality risk, and improve the quality of life in patients. It is possible that a combination therapy would be more beneficial than UDCA alone. Initial results of administering UDCA with colchicine have shown no improvement in liver histology; however, administration of UDCA together with a strong anti-inflammatory drugs may be helpful to halt immune destruction of liver cells.

Gas chromatography of bile acids

Bile acids, the end products of cholesterol metabolism in the liver, are of vital importance in the tissue distribution of cholesterol. Abnormalities in cholesterol biosynthesis or metabolism are often reflected in the proportions, concentrations and conjugation of bile acids in various tissues and determination of bile acids in these tissues is important in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary diseases. Several methods for quantitative determination of bile acids in biological fluids are known and have been reviewed. In this review, we have discussed the gas-chromatographic method for determination of bile acids with special reference to bile acid quantitation in plasma, bile, urine and stool.

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis. A 10-year British single-centre population-based audit of efficacy and survival

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment on survival in primary biliary cirrhosis was studied in 40 patients with symptomatic disease. Two patients developed early exacerbation of symptoms and stopped therapy in days; they are both alive 4 and 4 1/2 years later. The other 38 patients have continued on treatment for up to 10 years. Results were compared with 12 other similar cases previously seen but not given specific therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that ursodeoxycholic acid treatment was associated with better survival (p < 0.05) after the first two years of therapy. Predictors of favourable outcome included histological stage I disease. In 26 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis stage II, III or IV, therapy showed a trend to improved survival, but this was still significantly worse than the general population. Prognosis was not different between these different advanced stages. Symptoms improved in 28 out of 40 patients on ursodeoxycholic acid, but 50% had a recurrence by two years.

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on conjugated bile acids and progesterone metabolites in serum and urine of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

BACKGROUND/AIMS AND METHODS

The mechanism(s) behind the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on serum steroid sulphate profiles in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is not clear. Conjugated progesterone metabolites and bile acids have therefore been analysed in serum and urine of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy before and during treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid using chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods.

RESULTS

The concentration of glycine-/taurine-conjugated bile acids decreased from 8.9+/-3 micromol/l (mean+/-SEM) before treatment to 1.8+/-0.6 micromol/l during treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid. The total bile acid excretion in urine decreased from 56+/-14 to 32+/-5.6 micromol/g creatinine. The proportion of cholic acid in serum and urine, and of 1beta-, 2beta- and 6alpha-hydroxylated cholic acids in urine decreased markedly during ursodeoxycholic acid while the percentages of 3alpha,12alpha-dihydroxy-3-oxo-4-cholenoic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid were unchanged. The levels in serum and excretion in urine of sulphated steroids decreased during ursodeoxycholic acid, by 45-49% for disulphates and 33-35% for monosulphates. The ratios of 3alpha- to 3beta-hydroxysteroid disulphates were lowered by ursodeoxycholic acid from 1.1 (mean) to 0.68 in serum, and from 1.2 to 0.70 in urine. The corresponding ratios for monosulphates before and during ursodeoxycholic acid were 6.9 and 4.5, respectively, in serum, and 21 and 5.2, respectively, in urine. The major monosulphates in urine, dominated by 5alpha-pregnane-3alpha, 20alpha-diol, were also conjugated with N-acetylglucosamine. The excretion of these double conjugates decreased from 27+/-8.4 to 15+/-5.3 micromol/g creatinine during ursodeoxycholic acid. In contrast to sulphated steroids, the concentrations of glucuronides were unchanged in serum and their excretion in urine tended to increase during ursodeoxycholic acid. The metabolism of ursodeoxycholic acid was similar to that described in nonpregnant subjects. In addition to metabolites hydroxylated in the 1beta-, 5beta-, 6alpha/beta and 22-positions, a 4-hydroxy-ursodeoxycholic acid was tentatively identified. This occurred predominantly as a double conjugate with glycine/taurine and glucuronic acid, as did other 4-hydroxylated bile acids of probable foetal origin.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are compatible with the contention that ursodeoxycholic acid stimulates the biliary excretion of sulphated progesterone metabolites, particularly those with a 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha(H) configuration and disulphates. The effect(s) appears to be independent of the stimulation of bile acid secretion. An effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the reductive metabolism of progesterone cannot be excluded.

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. A Swedish multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been shown to improve serum levels of liver enzymes and bilirubin in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, it is still uncertain whether UDCA treatment also improves symptoms, liver histology, and survival without liver transplantation.

METHODS

We randomized 116 patients with PBC to receive 0.5 g UDCA (n = 60) or placebo (n = 56) daily for 2 years. During the next 2 years, 80% of the UDCA-treated patients and 65% of the placebo-treated patients continued to take UDCA.

RESULTS

UDCA improved serum enzyme values but not survival, symptoms, serum bilirubin levels, or liver histology. There was no significant difference in response between initially symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

UDCA in a dosage of 7.7 mg/kg body weight is of little benefit in PBC. This does not exclude the possibility that larger doses have beneficial effects.

Increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 serum concentration in cholestasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Increase of serum levels of the soluble intercellular adhesion molecules in patients with the cholestatic liver diseases primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are known and have been thought to indicate activation of the immune system and the grade of the inflammatory process. In hepatitis and cholestatic diseases, expression of adhesion molecules was found on the surface of bile duct epithelia and hepatocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum levels of sICAM-1 in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis in PBC (n = 42) and extrahepatic cholestasis (n = 18) due to choledocholithiasis were investigated. sICAM-1 levels and "classical" cholestasis parameters as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (gamma-GTP) and bilirubin levels were compared. Furthermore, sICAM-1 concentrations and "classical" cholestasis parameters were analysed before and after therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). In addition, sICAM-1 was detected in serum and bile fluid of four patients with cholestasis due to choledocholithiasis. Soluble ICAM-1 levels in sera and, if accessible, in bile fluids were determined using a commercially available ELISA system. Statistics were done by Wilcoxon's signed rank exact test and Spearman's rank correlation test. Sensitivity and specificity of cholestasis parameters and sICAM-1 concentrations was analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Increased sICAM-1 serum concentrations in a similar range were found in patients with PBC (range 251-2620 micrograms/l; median 966 micrograms/l) as well as in patients with extrahepatic cholestasis (257-2961 micrograms/l; median 760 micrograms/l) compared to healthy controls (n = 12; 220-500 micrograms/l; median 318 micrograms/l). sICAM-1 levels correlated significantly to histological stage I to IV (p < 0.001), ALP (range 107-1877 U/l; median 545 U/l; r = 0.496, p = 0.0008), bilirubin (range 0.3-26 mg/dl; median 0.8 mg/dl; r = 0.52; p < 0.0004) and gamma-GTP levels (range 43-705 U/l; median 221 U/l; r = 0.36; p = 0.02) in PBC patients. In PBC patients a histological stage III or IV (n = 21) could be predicted with high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%) if sICAM-1 levels were above 840 micrograms/l. After treatment of PBC patients with UDCA, sICAM-1 levels decreased significantly with decline of other "classical" cholestasis parameters. Increased sICAM-1 levels (range 257-2961, median 745 micrograms/l) in extrahepatic cholestasis correlated also significantly with serum concentrations of bilirubin (r = 0.8; p < 0.01; range 0.3-19.7, median 1.6 mg/dl), gamma-GTP (r = 0.55; p = 0.03; range 33-1401, median 179 U/l) and ALP (r = 0.61; p = 0.1; range 110-1378, median 562 U/l). sICAM-1 was detectable in bile fluid (264-919 micrograms/l) of four patients with extrahepatic cholestasis and nose-biliary catheterisation.

CONCLUSIONS

sICAM-1 concentrations were found to discriminate between histological stage I/II and stage III/IV of PBC with higher sensitivity and specificity than "classical" cholestasis parameters. Increased serum concentrations for sICAM-1 in intra- and in extrahepatic cholestasis and detection of sICAM-1 in the bile may indicate that sICAM-1 is eliminated through the bile. In other words, not only increased synthesis but also decreased elimination may be responsible for increased sICAM-1 serum levels in patients with cholestatic liver diseases.

Metabolism of orally administered tauroursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

The metabolism of tauroursodeoxycholic acid orally administered and its effects on the bile acid pool of patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis is described. Patients were randomly assigned 500, 1000, or 1500 mg/day of tauroursodeoxycholate for six months. Biliary and serum bile acids were measured before and during treatment by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and by high performance liquid chromatography. During tauroursodeoxycholate administration, the proportion of total ursodeoxycholate in bile reached mean (SEM) 34.4 (4.5)%, 32.8 (2.8)%, and 41.6 (3.0)% with doses of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/day, respectively. Significant decreases in the proportions of chenodeoxycholate and cholate resulted. The glycine/taurine ratio of the biliary bile acid pool decreased from 1.9 at baseline, to 1.1 with the highest dose. Ursodeoxycholate in bile was conjugated with glycine and taurine, indicating that tauroursodeoxycholate undergoes significant deconjugation and reconjugation during its enterohepatic recycling. The proportion of lithocholate in bile remained unchanged. Fasting serum conjugated ursodeoxycholate concentration positively correlated with the tauroursodeoxycholate dose, and the increased proportion of ursodeoxycholate was accompanied by substantial decreases in the endogenous bile acids. Compared with previously published data for ursodeoxycholic acid therapy, these findings indicate that the shift toward a more hydrophilic bile acid pool is greater and potentially more favourable with tauroursodeoxycholate, and this is because of the reduced intestinal biotransformation of tauroursodeoxycholate.

Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in chronic viral hepatitis C with high serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase levels

We administered ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) orally, at a daily dose of 600 mg, for 4 months to 36 patients with chronic viral hepatitis C. Another 36 patients with chronic viral hepatitis C, treated with placebo for 4 months, served as controls. None of the patients were alcoholics and none suffering from autoimmune hepatitis. Of the 36 patients in the UDCA-treated group, 13 had high levels of serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), i.e., exceeding 150 U/l (normal < 50 U/l). Histological examination of liver biopsy specimens obtained from 10 patients in this group before treatment suggested that damage of the interlobular bile ducts was prominent in patients with higher levels of serum GGT. After 1 month of UDCA treatment, significant decreases in the levels of serum GGT, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were observed (P < 0.05 for GGT and AST), and the decreases continued for the 4-month treatment period. The reduction of GGT levels was the most prominent change in the liver function indices; the percent change in the GGT level was -25.2 +/- 4.4 (mean percent change +/- SE) at 1 month and -38.0 +/- 5.0 at 4 months. A significant correlation was observed between the serum delta GGT level (GGT value before treatment minus value after 3 months of treatment) and the total score for morphological injury of the bile ducts (P < 0.05). These results suggested that UDCA has the potential to reverse hepatocellular damage in patients with chronic viral hepatitis C, in whom high GGT levels may be due, in part, to a damaged interlobular bile duct. UDCA may be useful for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis C, especially in patients exhibiting a high level of GGT.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on biochemical parameters, hepatocyte proliferation and liver histology in galactosamine hepatitis in the rat

The effect of oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on biochemical parameters, liver histology and liver cell proliferation was investigated in rats with galactosamine hepatitis. Treatment with UDCA led to a decrease of aminotransferases, but did not show any significant changes in liver histology or liver cell proliferation. The improvement of liver enzymes without change of histology in this animal model of hepatitis following treatment with UDCA is in agreement with results obtained from clinical trials with UDCA in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

Hepatobiliary pruritus: what are effective treatments?

Pruritus is a common symptom in patients with hepatobiliary disease. Numerous treatments have been attempted. We review published therapeutic trials for hepatobiliary pruritus and utilize statistical analysis to evaluate treatment results. Randomized placebo-controlled studies show cholestyramine, rifampin, naloxone, S-adenosylmethionine, prednisolone, and propofol to be effective. Suggestions for future studies of the treatment of hepatobiliary puruitus are proposed.

Tauroursodeoxycholate increases rat liver ursodeoxycholate levels and limits lithocholate formation better than ursodeoxycholate

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To explain the greater hepatoprotective effect of tauroursodeoxycholic acid vs. ursodeoxycholic acid, the absorption, hepatic enrichment, and biotransformation of these bile acids (250 mg/day) were compared in rats.

METHODS

Bile acids were determined in intestinal contents, feces, urine, plasma, and liver by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The concentration of ursodeoxycholate in the liver of animals administered tauroursodeoxycholic acid (175 +/- 29 nmol/g) was greater (P < 0.05) than in animals administered ursodeoxycholic acid (79 +/- 19 nmol/g). Hepatic lithocholate was substantially higher after ursodeoxycholic acid administration (21 +/- 10 nmol/g) than after tauroursodeoxycholic acid administration (12 +/- 1 nmol/g). A concomitant reduction in the proportion of hydrophobic bile acids occurred that was greatest during tauroursodeoxycholic acid administration. In the intestinal tract, the mass of ursodeoxycholate and its specific metabolites was greater in rats administered tauroursodeoxycholic acid (27.2 mg) than those administered ursodeoxycholic acid (13.2 mg). In feces, the proportion of lithocholate was 21.9% +/- 4.9% and 5.4% +/- 4.0% after ursodeoxycholic acid and tauroursodeoxycholic acid administration, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ursodeoxycholic acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid induces a greater decrease in the percent composition of more hydrophobic bile acids within the pool, limits lithocholate formation, and increases hepatic ursodeoxycholate concentration. These differences are explained by increased hepatic extraction and reduced intestinal biotransformation and not by enhanced absorption of the amidated species.

Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C. Patients who failed to have sustained responses to interferon (IFN) therapy, refused to take IFN or were unsuitable for IFN treatment were enrolled into this study. The treatment group had 15 patients and they received UDCA 600 mg orally per day for 6 months. Another 15 patients with matched sex, age and initial serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were chosen as the control group. Three parameters (i.e. serum ALT levels, serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and serum cytokines) were measured before and after UDCA treatment. After the treatment period, the mean serum ALT levels in both groups were not significantly different (153.8 +/- 111.0 U/L vs 112.1 +/- 53.8 U/L, P > 0.05) and mean serum ALT level in the UDCA-treated group did not decrease after the treatment (pre-treatment vs post-treatment value: 139.1 +/- 73.1 U/L vs 153.8 +/- 111.0 U/L, P > 0.05). In addition, all of the patients with positive HCV RNA before treatment still had active HCV viraemia after the UDCA treatment. Also, the serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were not significantly different between the two groups before and after the treatment period. In conclusion, a regimen of UDCA as prescribed in the present study did not show obvious benefits in the treatment of Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Ethnopharmacology of bear gall bladder: I

Both bear and pig bile solutions were shown to have anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsion and analgesic effects, and also to prolong the survival time of mice in hypoxic conditions. It is possible that pig gall bladders could be developed as an alternative to bear gall bladders for uses in certain prescriptions of Chinese medicine.

Hepatoprotection in ethinylestradiol-treated rats is provided by tauroursodeoxycholic acid, but not by ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) have been suggested as potential treatments for drug-induced cholestasis. It was therefore decided to study the effects of administration of UDCA or TUDCA on individual serum bile acid concentration, conventional liver tests and associated hepatic ultrastructural changes in ethinylestradiol-treated (EE) rats mg/kg per day). Control rats were treated s.c. with propylene glycol. EE-treated rats were randomly assigned to receive daily i.p. injections of placebo, TUDCA or UDCA. Four rats in each group were treated for 4 consecutive days, and a second four for 14 days. After 4 days of treatment, the serum levels of cholic acid and taurocholic acid were significantly increased in EE-treated rats. None of the conventional liver tests were significantly different among the four groups. After 14 days of treatment the serum levels of cholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, glycocholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, taurocholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic acid, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyltransferase were significantly raised in EE and EE plus UDCA treated rats. EE plus TUDCA treated rats, however, had no significant changes in these individual serum bile acids or conventional liver tests. The ultrastructure of livers from EE plus TUDCA treated rats was similar to those of controls. On the other hand, EE and EE plus UDCA rats both showed a significant reduction in sinusoidal microvilli. These results show that treatment of rats for 4 days with EE induces significant rises in the serum concentrations of two individual bile acids and that TUDCA protects against this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy of chronic cholestatic conditions in adults and children

Cholestasis can be defined as the manifestation of defective bile acid transport from the liver to the intestine. Most chronic cholestatic conditions can progress towards cirrhosis. At this stage, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice. Most of the drugs so far evaluated show some degree of efficacy but have major side effects. Given that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has no apparent toxicity in humans, it was postulated that long-term treatment with this drug might displace endogenous bile acids and thus reverse their suspected toxicity. We demonstrated that long-term UDCA therapy slows the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis and reduces the need for liver transplantation. In this review, we give the rationale for the use of UDCA in cholestasis and discuss its possible mechanisms of action. We also give an overview of current data on UDCA therapy of chronic cholestatic disorders in adults and children.

Hepatocyte proliferation in primary biliary cirrhosis as assessed by proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 antigen labelling

Expression of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 antigen by hepatocytes was investigated in liver tissue specimens of 29 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (stage I 13, stage II 6, stage III 5 and stage IV 5 patients) prior to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and of five control subjects using immunocytochemical methods. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 expression were reevaluated in seven patients after 3 years of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling indices were significantly higher in primary biliary cirrhosis (stage I, 6.4% to 32.4%, median, 10.9%; stage II, 9.6% to 21.6%, median 11.4%; stage III, 5.2% to 12.5%, median, 7.6%; stage IV, 3.8% to 8.9%, median, 5.6%) than in controls (0% to 0.5%, median, 0.1%; p < 0.005). Ki-67 antigen labelling counts were lower than proliferating cell nuclear antigen indices but elevated in all stages of primary biliary cirrhosis (stage I, 0.5% to 3.5%, median 2.0%; stage II, 1.8% to 3.6%, median 2.6%; stage III, 1.3% to 2.5%, median 1.9%; stage IV, 0.4% to 1.7%, median 1.0%) compared with controls (0% to 0.5%, median 0.3%; p < 0.005). After ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, mean proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 labelling indices decreased from a median of 9.0% (range, 3.8% to 32.4%) to a median of 7.8% (range, 4.5% to 17.2%; p = 0.045) for proliferating cell nuclear antigen and from a median of 2.5% (range, 0.8% to 3.6%) to a median of 2.1% (range, 0.9% to 3.1%; p = 0.031) for Ki-67 antigen. It is concluded that hepatocyte proliferation is markedly increased in primary biliary cirrhosis, particularly in the early stages of the disease, and that ursodeoxycholic acid treatment reduces proliferative activity in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Ursodeoxycholate protects oxidative mitochondrial metabolism from bile acid toxicity: dose-response study in isolated rat liver mitochondria

The effect of ursodeoxycholate and tauroursodeoxycholate on the toxicity of lipophilic bile acids (chenodeoxycholate and lithocholate) on the function of the electron transport chain was investigated in isolated rat liver mitochondria. At a concentration of 30 mumol/L, both chenodeoxycholate and lithocholate reduced state 3 oxidation rates and respiratory control ratios of L-glutamate, succinate and duroquinol. In contrast, ADP/O ratios of these substrates and oxidative metabolism of ascorbate were not significantly affected. Ursodeoxycholate did not impair mitochondrial oxidative metabolism up to concentrations of 100 mumol/L; at 300 mumol/L, however, it decreased state 3 oxidation rates and respiratory control ratios of L-glutamate, succinate and duroquinol. Tauroursodeoxycholate had no significant inhibitory effect on state 3 oxidation rates of L-glutamate and succinate at concentrations up to 300 mumol/L. When ursodeoxycholate (final concentration, 30 mumol/L or 100 mumol/L) was added to mitochondrial incubations containing chenodeoxycholate or lithocholate, the toxic effects of lipophilic bile acids on mitochondrial oxidative metabolism were partially reversed. However, 300 mumol/L ursodeoxycholate, in combination with chenodeoxycholate or lithocholate, exhibited greater toxicity compared with incubations containing only the individual bile acids. In contrast to ursodeoxycholate, tauroursodeoxycholate did not reduce the toxic effects of chenodeoxycholate or lithocholate on mitochondrial metabolism. Ursodeoxycholate (100 mumol/L) significantly decreased the incorporation of chenodeoxycholate into mitochondrial membranes, whereas the decrease in lithocholate incorporation was not statistically significant. These studies demonstrate that ursodeoxycholate, but not tauroursodeoxycholate, decreases the toxicity of lipophilic bile acids on the function of the electron but increases bile acid-induced mitochondrial toxicity at higher concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid after 4 to 12 years of therapy in early and late stages of primary biliary cirrhosis

Twenty-two patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid, 10 mg/kg per day. Fourteen patients with stages I/II were treated for 4-12 years (mean 7.5), and eight patients with stages III/IV for 5-12 years (mean 6.5). Twelve of 13 patients with early stages became asymptomatic. Aminotransferases, cholestasis-indicating enzymes and IgM improved (p < 0.01) and remained low during the whole treatment period. Ursodeoxycholic acid was the predominant serum bile acid, and lithocholic acid did not increase in the serum but did increase in the stool. Of eight patients with stages III/IV, seven were symptomatic, and four became asymptomatic. In all eight patients, laboratory data improved. Of these eight patients three experienced haemorrhage from oesophageal varices, two had to be transplanted, and one of them died. In one patient splenic rupture occurred, and in three liver function tests deteriorated. Although the number of patients was small, this is the longest treatment period so far reported. Ursodeoxycholic acid had no side effects for up to 12 years, and in patients with early stages it seemed to have a beneficial effect on symptoms and the progression of the disease. However, even with up to 12 years of therapy, ursodeoxycholic acid did not cause antimitochondrial antibodies to disappear either in the early or in the late stages, it was unable to prevent rebound effects during therapy intermission even after more than 5 years of continuous therapy, there was no decisive influence on liver histology and it did not cure the disease. Finally, although ursodeoxycholic acid improved life quality and laboratory data in all patients with late stages of the disease, it did not prevent complications due to cirrhosis.

Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and obliterative fibrosis of bile ducts leading to their progressive destruction (1-4). As a consequence, cholestasis with elevated serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (AP) and gamme glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and bilirubin in more advanced disease is the most prominent feature of this disease. The diagnosis of PSC is primarily based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with demonstration of irregular strictures and dilatations. In liver biopsy, typical findings are portal and periodical inflammation and fibrosis. Since PSC is a focal disease, the characteristic histological findings may or may not be seen in a single liver biopsy. The cause of PSC is still unknown. The association with histocombatibility antigens indicates that immunological mechanisms may be involved but it is still unclear whether the disease is immunogenic. Alternatively, bacteria and bacterial toxins from the colon might play a role (3, 4). In 70% of cases PSC is associated with ulcerative colitis (5) and, therefore, in all patients with this intestinal disease who also have elevated levels of liver enzymes, a cholangiography should be performed. Recently, in up to 80% of patients with PSC anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmatic-antigens (ANCA) were found to be elevated (6) and, in future, this test may help to diagnose the disease more easily. Up to now, however, the disease is usually diagnosed at a relatively advanced stage when the patients have jaundice.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on in vivo and in vitro toxic liver injury in rats

BACKGROUND

Benefits of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in cholestatic disorders have been well documented. However, the therapeutic potential of UDCA in parenchymal liver disease is unclear.

METHODS

We tested UDCA in rat models of hepatotoxicity: (a) in subacute liver injury induced by repetitive CCl4 and dietary ethyl alcohol (ETH) over seven weeks while receiving oral UDCA; and, (b) in liver slides incubated with CCl4, ETH or p-acetaminophen (APAP) when UDCA was added to the incubating solution.

RESULTS

Experiment 1: CCl4 combined with ETH reduced the body weights and resulted in 43% mortality. There was a significant rise in serum ALT, alkaline phosphatase, lipoperoxides (LPO) and in hepatic weight, triglycerides, LPO and histological scores of liver injury. Experiment 2: When liver slides were incubated with hepatotoxins there was an increased transfer of AST and LPO from the tissue into the incubate and a reduction in the valine and thymidine incorporation into the liver proteins or DNA. In none of these situations, whether the liver damage was severe or mild, in vivo or in vitro, UDCA did abolish these hepatotoxic effects.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to clinical cholestatic disorders where the reported benefits of UDCA depend on replacement of the accumulated hydrophobic bile acids, these bile acids have a less prominent role in toxic liver injury and UDCA is ineffective.

A two year controlled trial examining the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis

Forty-six patients with primary biliary cirrhosis from a single centre were studied in a randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) over a 2 year period. The two groups were well-matched at baseline. For each parameter, by calculating the difference between the median changes with time between the UDCA group and the placebo group, it was found that from entry, with respect to placebo, there were differences between median changes (MCD) favouring the UDCA group in bilirubin (MCD 5 mumol/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 12] at 1 year and 5 mumol/L (95% CI 1 to 9) at 2 years), alkaline phosphatase MCD 242 iu/L (95% CI 107 to 360) at 1 year and 268 iu/L (95% CI 146 to 424) at 2 years and aspartate aminotransferase MCD 26 iu/L (95% CI 12 to 41) at 1 year and 37 iu/L (95% CI 16 to 64) at 2 years. Within the UDCA group, there was long-term fall in alkaline phosphatase [median fall 116 iu/L (95% CI 93 to 378) at 2 years and aspartate aminotransferase [median fall 18 iu/L (95% CI 6 to 47) at 2 years; however, the major change in bilirubin was a modest rise over 2 years in the placebo group [median rise 2 mumol/L (95% CI 1 to 9)]. Changes in albumin, prothrombin ratio and immunoglobulins were generally minor and not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Morphologic changes in livers of hamsters treated with high doses of ursodeoxycholic acid: correlation with bile acids in bile

The effects of high doses of ursodeoxycholic acid on bile acid composition and the liver morphology was examined in 60 male Syrian golden hamsters. The animals were allocated to five groups: I, control; II and IV received 0.5 g and 1 g of ursodeoxycholic acid per 100 g of standard diet respectively over 30 days and III and V received 0.5 g and 1 g of ursodeoxycholic acid per 100 g of standard diet respectively over 60 days. Bile acids were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. In all treated groups there was a significant increase in chenodeoxycholic and lithocholic acid in the bile. The mean glyco/tauro ratio was significantly higher than in the control group, reaching values > 1 for individual bile acids, except for lithocholic acid values which remained < 1. Under light microscopy, the livers of the hamsters showed damage which was dose/time related, namely portal inflammatory infiltrate, bile duct proliferation, cholestasis, fat infiltration and necrosis. Electron microscopy revealed pronounced changes starting with microvilli edema and extending to canalicular membrane destruction and necrosis. The changes observed in the relation glyco/tauro lithocholic acids, may be due to defence mechanisms to avoid hepatotoxicity. The hepatotoxicity resulting from ursodeoxycholic acid administration is presumed to be due primarily to lithocholic acid or some lithocholic acid metabolite.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver and bile duct disease in primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 3-year pilot study with a placebo-controlled study period

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a cholestatic disease of the liver characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and obliteration of the extra- and/or intrahepatic bile ducts. There is no effective therapy. We, therefore, studied the safety and efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with or without additional ulcerative colitis. In a 1-year ursodeoxycholic acid treatment period, which preceded the controlled study period, ursodeoxycholic acid was well tolerated in 22 of 24 patients with ulcerative colitis and in all three patients without ulcerative colitis. In two patients with ulcerative colitis the dose of 750 mg ursodeoxycholic acid/day led to diarrhea, but following reduction of the dose to 500 and 250 mg/day ursodeoxycholic acid was well tolerated. After 1 year of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, 20 patients were randomly assigned to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid 750 mg/day or placebo. All of them finished a double-blind, placebo-controlled study period. During ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, the liver enzymes improved markedly. The difference in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase between the placebo and ursodeoxycholic acid group was significant (p < 0.05). Following ursodeoxycholic acid treatment, pruritus and fatigue improved in half of the patients but the difference between the placebo and ursodeoxycholic acid group was not significant. According to the ethical guidelines, after 3 months of placebo treatment, the controlled study had to be discontinued because of a more than twofold increase of serum transaminases in 8/10 patients on placebo. After the end of the controlled study, all patients were continuously treated with ursodeoxycholic acid for up to 4 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Kinetics of hepatic bile acid handling in cholestatic liver disease: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is clinically beneficial in chronic cholestatic liver disease, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. It has been suggested that intrahepatic retention of endogenous hydrophobic bile acids contributes to cholestasis and that the hydrophilic bile acid UDCA reduces this retention; the aim of our study was to test these hypotheses.

METHODS

Twelve patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 5 with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were studied before and during UDCA (10 mg.kg-1.day-1) and compared with 11 healthy controls. Following intravenous 75Se labeled homocholic acid taurine (75SeHCAT) in the fasting state, abdominal gamma camera imaging was performed for 90 minutes. Initial hepatic uptake, transit time, net, and absolute excretory rates for 75SeHCAT were measured.

RESULTS

Mean initial hepatic uptake was not different between patients and controls (17.2% and 19.9% dose/minute, not significant). However, net and absolute excretory rates were significantly reduced in patients (1.4% vs. 3.7% dose/minute, P < 0.0001; and 2.35% vs. 3.96% dose/minute, P < 0.02, respectively), and hepatic transit time was prolonged (18.7 minutes vs. 11.6 minutes, P < 0.002). UDCA improved net and absolute hepatic excretory rates and transit time (1.43% to 1.96% dose/minute, P < 0.001; 2.35% to 3.15% dose/minute, P < 0.005 and 18.7 to 14.7 minutes, P < 0.001, respectively). However, UDCA did not alter initial hepatic uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

In PBC and PSC, there is a defect in hepatic bile acid excretion but not in uptake, implying bile acid retention. This retention is reduced by UDCA.

Cholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis. Changes in bile acid patterns and their correlation with liver function

We treated 6 patients with Stage II primary biliary cirrhosis with cholic acid (CA) 10 mg.kg-1 per day for 3 months and then with the same dose of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). A matching group of 6 patients was observed for 3 months without any therapy. Liver function tests and serum and stool bile acids were investigated before, during and at the end of CA and UDCA therapy. The results of liver function tests deteriorated after 6-8 weeks of CA therapy and the changes were correlated (r = 0.92) with an increase in alpha-dihydroxy-bile acids (chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid) in the serum. The 24 h excretion of DCA in 24 h faeces was markedly increased. Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment improved liver function tests; after 4 weeks glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) had decreased. After 8-12 weeks of therapy ursodeoxycholic acid had increased to 50-60% of the total serum bile acids whereas the more apolar bile acids were significantly decreased. No changes in liver function tests or bile acid metabolism were found in the untreated group. Since CA and UDCA are non-toxic in man, this trial indicates that the apolar bile acids chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid may be responsible for the deterioration of liver function in primary biliary cirrhosis. However, the therapeutic effect of UDCA cannot be explained merely by the decrease in alpha-dihydroxy-bile acids in the serum, since the laboratory results had improved prior to the decrease in the serum apolar bile acids.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the kinetics of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Treatment of patients with cholestatic liver diseases with ursodeoxycholic acid has been shown to have beneficial effects that may be related to a shift in the balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic bile acids in favor of hydrophilic bile acids. During treatment of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with ursodeoxycholic acid, plasma concentrations of some endogenous bile acids decrease. To test whether the changes in plasma bile acids are due to decreases of their pool sizes or synthesis rates, we determined bile acid kinetics of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acid in six patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, of whom four also had ulcerative colitis. All patients were studied before and 3 mo after the start of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Six healthy subjects served as controls. In patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, pool sizes of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acid were considerably smaller than those in healthy controls; after ursodeoxycholic acid treatment they were unchanged. Fractional turnover and synthesis of cholic acid increased significantly after ursodeoxycholic acid administration. Fractional turnover of chenodeoxycholic acid also increased significantly, whereas synthesis of this bile acid was unchanged. Our data indicate that in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, pool sizes of bile acids are reduced. The decrease of levels of endogenous bile acids in plasma under ursodeoxycholic acid treatment despite unchanged bile acid pool sizes indicates redistribution of the bile acids into the enterohepatic circulation, probably because of improved hepatic clearance after ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.