Diagnosis of hepatitis delta virus infection

Hepatitis delta virus: the molecular basis of laboratory diagnosis

Infection with hepatitis delta virus (HDV), a satellite virus of hepatitis B virus (HBV), is associated with severe and sometimes fulminant hepatitis. The traditional methods for the diagnosis of HDV infection, such as detection of serum anti-HD antibodies, are sufficient for the clinical diagnosis of delta infection. However, such techniques lack the sensitivity and specificity required to more accurately characterize the nature of HDV infection and to assess the efficacy of therapies. Recent improvements in molecular techniques, such as HDV RNA hybridization and RT-PCR, have provided increased diagnostic precision and a more thorough understanding of the natural course of HDV infection. These advances have enhanced the clinician's ability to accurately evaluate the stage of HDV infection, response to therapy, and occurrence of reinfection after orthotopic liver transplant. This review focuses on the recent advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of HDV and in the laboratory diagnosis of HDV infection.

Survival and complications in a cohort of patients with anti-delta positive liver disease presenting in a tertiary referral clinic

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome and survival of patients with anti-Delta positive liver disease in The Netherlands.

METHODS

We evaluated those patients visiting our hospital between 1978 and 1993 with respect to clinical, virological and histological parameters. During the follow-up period the occurrence of complications of the liver disease and survival was determined. Thirty patients with a median age of 34 years (range 21-52) were included.

RESULTS

During an average follow up of 4.8 years, nine patients died. The overall 5-year survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meyer analysis was 71%, which was comparable to hepatitis B cirrhosis patients. However, in the group without active hepatitis B replication (HBeAg-negative) a clear trend towards a worse survival was identified in Delta cirrhosis patients. Complications and deaths occurred exclusively in the patient group with cirrhotic liver disease. The complications (ascites, elevated bilirubin >34 micro mol/l), variceal bleeding and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) occurred in 52% of the patients with a follow up of more than 6 months (n=27). Fifty-seven percent of those patients died. In our population anti-Delta positive liver disease affects predominantly young patients and is related to advanced liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the high death rate, liver transplantation should be considered when signs or symptoms of decompensated liver disease occur.

Chronic viral hepatitis and the management of chronic renal failure

Effective control measures to reduce the spread of HBV in dialysis units have had a major beneficial impact on the management of patients with chronic renal failure (Table 3). The exact impact of chronic HBV infection on graft and patient survival following RT remains unclear, and the outcome may depend in great part on the severity of the pre-RT liver disease. RT should only be offered to HBV-infected patients after careful consideration of all the pertinent data, including results of liver biopsy. Advances in HBV vaccination may further decrease the risk of infection in patients on HD. Our understanding of HCV is evolving rapidly, but the question of the risk of transmission of HCV within dialysis units is still unsettled and thus recommendations about isolation of HCV-infected patients are not possible. Although RT does not appear to be deleterious in many HCV-infected patients, histologic and clinical evidence of severe liver disease should also prompt caution in offering RT. Longer term studies are required to assess the ultimate effect of RT in patients with HCV. Clearly, subjective improvement of quality of life associated with successful RT compared to chronic dialysis should not be withheld lightly. Pending further experience, use of organs from anti-HCV-positive donors in non-emergent situations is best avoided. The role of antiviral agents in RT recipients with chronic viral hepatitis also remains to be defined. Improved supportive care of patients with chronic renal disease, including erythropoietin therapy, as well as improved tests for anti-HCV screening of donor blood will help to further diminish exposure to HCV in HD units.

Comparative analysis of serological markers of chronic delta infection: HDV-RNA, serum HDAg and anti-HD IgM

To study the concordance, sensitivity and specificity of HDV-RNA determination by molecular hybridization, serum HDAg by immunoblot and anti-HD IgM by commercial enzyme immunoassay as compared to intrahepatic HDAg detection by an immunoperoxidase method, a statistical analysis was applied to the results of serum sample and liver biopsy determinations in 50 patients with chronic delta hepatitis (38 positive to tissue HDAg and 12 negative). Of the 38 patients with hepatic HDAg, HDV-RNA was found in 31 (82%), serum HDAg by immunoblot in 27 (71%) and anti-HD IgM in 33 (87%). Among the 12 patients without hepatic HDAg, one was found with serum HDAg using the immunoblot technique, two (17%) had HDV-RNA, and 7 (58%) had anti-HD IgM. Serum HDAg determination by immunoblot was the most specific test, followed by HDV-RNA analysis. The least specific was the anti-HD IgM technique. The anti-HD IgM test was the most sensitive, followed by HDV-RNA and serum HDAg. The concordance with intrahepatic HDAg detection was highest for HDV-RNA determination, followed by HDAg in serum. The least degree of concordance was found with anti-HD IgM determination. These results suggest that the determination of HDV-RNA by the hybridization method can be of great value for the diagnosis and monitoring of chronic delta hepatitis.

Hepatitis delta virus RNA in serum of patients with chronic delta hepatitis

We studied 28 patients with chronic delta hepatitis for the presence of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA in serum. The hot start polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, in which the reaction begins at 60-80 degrees C, showed a higher sensitivity than conventional PCR reaction. Additionally, the presence of hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) infections were determined by PCR. HDV RNA was detected in 26 patients (93%), HBV DNA in 22 (79%), and HCV RNA in only one. Detection of HDV RNA correlated very well with detection of hepatitis delta antigen by immunostaining in the liver. In six patients HDV RNA was detectable despite the absence of HBV DNA in serum, suggesting that high levels of HBV are not required for HDV replication. Of 29 control patients with chronic hepatitis B without antibody to HDV, none had detectable HDV RNA, while all had HBV DNA in serum. Detection of HDV RNA with PCR proved highly sensitive and specific, demonstrating that virtually all patients with chronic HDV infection had ongoing viral replication.

Elimination of hepatitis delta virus infection after loss of hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with chronic delta hepatitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection treated with alpha interferon and subsequent loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) eliminate HDV. HDV RNA was detected in 26 of 28 patients with chronic delta hepatitis using the polymerase chain reaction. Seventeen patients in whom HDV RNA was detected were treated with alpha interferon; in 65%, HDV RNA remained detectable during treatment or reappeared after stopping therapy whereas in three patients HDV RNA remained absent (17.5%). HDV RNA became and remained undetectable in serum and liver of two of these three patients who lost HBsAg from serum and in one patient who was intermittently HBsAg negative during therapy. After loss of HBsAg, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was still detectable in the liver, but not HBV RNA, indicating absent or very low HBV replication. Three patients were lost to follow up (17.5%). Two nontreated patients with chronic HDV infection also lost HBsAg during follow up; HDV RNA also became undetectable in their serum. Thus, HDV replication does not persist after the loss of HBsAg. Clearance of HBsAg may be a useful guide to when therapy can be stopped.

Diagnosis and treatment of the major hepatotropic viruses

The hepatotropic viruses currently include hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E, and are associated with a spectrum of acute and chronic liver disease syndromes. The epidemiology and natural history of each are discussed, with emphasis on uncommon or newly recognized clinical presentations. The serodiagnosis of hepatitis A, B, and D is well established; the serodiagnosis of hepatitis C and E continues to evolve as serologic and virologic assays become refined. Hepatitis A and E only cause acute liver injury; current medical approaches therefore focus on vaccination strategies. Hepatitis B, C, and D can cause both acute and chronic liver injury. Sequelae of chronic liver disease, including portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, are not uncommon. Medical therapy of resulting chronic liver disease currently consists of interferon, though other anti-viral strategies are being explored. Advanced chronic liver disease due to hepatitis B, C, or D can be treated by orthotopic liver transplantation, but viral recurrence is near uniform and can be problematic. Further study of the hepatotropic viruses at the molecular biologic, epidemiologic, and clinical levels will continue to provide greater insight into the diagnosis and management of their associated clinical syndromes.

Detection of hepatitis delta virus RNA in human liver tissue by non-radioactive in situ hybridization

Several studies have demonstrated the presence of serum HDV-RNA by molecular hybridization in patients with chronic D infection, but there is scarce information about the presence of HDV-RNA in hepatic tissue. The presence of HDV-RNA by in situ hybridization (ISH) with a non-radioactive probe in paraffin-embedded hepatic tissue was studied in 29 patients with chronic delta hepatitis (20 with and 9 without intrahepatic delta antigen) and correlate their presence with the expression of hepatic delta antigen and serum HDV-RNA by dot-blot hybridization. HDV-RNA was detected by in situ hybridization in 18 cases: 16 of the 20 (80%) biopsies with intrahepatic delta antigen and 2 of the 9 (22%) without. HDV-RNA was not detected in any of the control cases. Serum HDV-RNA was found in 19 cases: 18 (90%) of 20 chronic delta hepatitis cases with tissular delta antigen and one of the 9 without intrahepatic delta antigen. All patients except one, who was positive for intrahepatic HDV-RNA, showed serum HDV-RNA. However, in two cases ISH detected hepatic HDV-RNA without tissular HDAg; one of these also had serum HDV-RNA and in the other positivity for hepatic HDV-RNA by ISH was the only marker of viral delta replication. In conclusion, detection of HDV-RNA in hepatic tissue by in situ hybridization with a digoxygenin-labelled probe is a rapid and sensitive method that could be a useful tool for diagnosis of HDV infection in clinical laboratories.

Persistent delta antigenaemia in chronic delta hepatitis and its relation with human immunodeficiency virus infection

The prevalence of persistent hepatitis delta (HD) antigenaemia and associated factors in patients with chronic infection with the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) were investigated. Among 157 consecutive patients known to be carriers of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 36 (23%) had one serum marker of HDV infection (anti-HD and/or HDAg). Nine of the patients with an HDV marker were HDAg positive, including three who were anti-HD negative. A follow-up over a mean period of 13 months showed that five of five patients had a persistent HD antigenaemia. This serological profile was associated with the presence of antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) (P < 0.01), serum HIV antigen (HIVAg) (P < 0.2), and the female sex (P < 0.05). Persistent HD antigenaemia could be the consequence of the suppression of T cell cytotoxic activity against hepatocytes expressing HDAg, a lower humoral response, and/or hormonal factors.

Co-expression of markers for hepatitis delta and hepatitis B viruses in human liver

Delta hepatitis (HDV) infection can only occur in the presence of hepatitis B (HBV) infection, as HDV requires a coat of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) for assembly of complete virus. A number of studies have examined the variation of HBV markers in serum and liver during establishment of HDV infection, but none has systematically examined the relationship between the two viruses in individual hepatocytes. Liver biopsies from five patients with HDV/HBV infection were stained for HBsAg, HBV core antigen (HBcAg) and hepatitis D (delta) antigen (HDAg). Double immunostaining was performed with a combination of indirect immunoperoxidase and alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase techniques. HDV and HBV antigens were expressed in all five liver biopsies. Co-localization of HBsAg was seen in up to 39% of HDAg positive cells, and HBcAg in up to 8% of HDAg positive cells. HBcAg was detectable in approximately 9% of HBsAg positive cells, and HBsAg in approximately 12% of HBcAg positive cells. HDV can replicate without HBV but ultimately requires HBV to produce complete virus and subsequently infect other cells. In this study the majority of HDV positive cells did not appear to contain HBV markers. This might suggest delta virus replication without assembly, or possibly sequential production/assembly of the virus.

Evaluation of hepatitis delta virus RNA levels during interferon therapy by analysis of polymerase chain reaction products with a nonradioisotopic hybridization assay

We developed a nonradioisotopic assay for detection of hepatitis delta virus RNA in serum by combining reverse transcription of RNA, polymerase chain reaction of the resultant complementary DNA and enzyme linked immunoassay detection of the polymerase chain reaction products using a monoclonal antibody specific for double-stranded DNA. This DNA enzyme immunoassay had a limit of detection of cloned hepatitis delta virus RNA similar to that of standard PCR followed by Southern-blot hybridization (approximately 10 copies/sample) and was 10(3) to 10(4) times more sensitive than direct dot-blot hybridization (approximately 10(5) copies/sample). Serial serum samples from six patients with chronic hepatitis delta virus infection undergoing interferon therapy were analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction followed by both standard hybridization and DNA enzyme immunoassay. The results of both methods were comparable, revealing disappearance of hepatitis delta virus RNA after 3 to 6 mo of therapy in three patients, two of whom had also a significant decrease in ALT activity. The DNA enzyme immunoassay test is therefore a potentially useful method for therapeutic monitoring in chronic hepatitis delta virus infection and may contribute to a wider application of polymerase chain reaction in clinical laboratories.

Correlation of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis D virus and human immunodeficiency virus type I infection markers in hepatitis B surface antigen positive haemophiliacs and patients without haemophilia with clinical and histopathological outcome of hepatitis

The hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection plays a major role in severe liver damage caused by hepatitis. To establish the prevalence of HDV infection in haemophilic patients and patients without haemophilia, 87 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were examined for serological evidence of delta hepatitis. In addition HBV, HDV and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection markers were compared to clinical and histopathological outcome of hepatitis. Out of 46 haemophiliacs 30 (65%) were anti-HD-seropositive; 10 out of 30 anti-HD-positive patients (33%) had pathological liver function tests compared to 2 out of 16 anti-HD-negative haemophiliacs (13%). The rate of HIV infection did not differ between the HDV infected and the non-HDV infected individuals with haemophilia (17/27 anti-HD-positive patients versus 12/16 anti-HD-negative patients). Two haemophilic anti-HD-positive patients underwent liver biopsy, in both cases hepatitis D antigen (HDAg) was detected in the biopsies. Only 2 out of 41 patients without haemophilia were anti-HD-positive. Both had pathological liver function tests; chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis, respectively, were diagnosed and HDAg was found in the liver biopsies. Out of 39 anti-HD-seronegative patients without haemophilia, 26 (67%) were hepatitis B e antigen positive; in the sera of 20 patients (51%) HBV-DNA was demonstrated, but only 6 patients (15%) had pathological liver function tests. In conclusion a high seroprevalence of HDV infection was found in haemophilic patients treated with non-pasteurized commercial clotting factor concentrates. An endemic spreading of HDV infection in patients without haemophilia with chronic HBV infection could not be detected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)