Reactivation of hepatitis B

Spontaneous reactivation of hepatitis B virus with multiple novel mutations in an elderly patient with resolved hepatitis B virus infection

Spontaneous reactivation of the Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is rare in individuals with previously resolved infections. This report presents the case of a 71 year-old Japanese woman who experienced HBV reactivation without any prior immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy. Before the onset of liver injury, the patient was negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but positive for hepatitis B surface antibody. She subsequently developed liver injury, with the reappearance of HBsAg and HBV DNA. The patient was successfully treated with tenofovir alafenamide, and prednisolone. Full-genome sequencing of HBV revealed subgenotype B1 without hepatitis B e-negative mutations in the precore and core promoter regions and 12 amino acid alterations in the pre-S1/S, P, and X genes. Notably, the S gene mutations D144A and K160N, which alter the antigenicity of HBsAg and potentially contribute to its reactivation, were identified. This case emphasizes the importance of vigilance for spontaneous reactivation of resolved HBV, highlighting the need for comprehensive genomic analysis to understand the associated virological intricacies.

Hepatitis B Reactivation and Vaccination Effectiveness after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Matched Case-Control Study

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at significant risk of hepatitis B (HB) virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr). Despite the clinical significance of HBVr after solid organ transplantation, data on the risk factors for HBVr and vaccine effectiveness in SOT recipients with resolved HBV infection are limited. This study evaluated the risk factors for HBVr and the seroconversion rates after HBV vaccination in SOT recipients. Patients who had undergone solid organ transplantation and those with a resolved HBV infection were identified. We matched patients who experienced post-transplantation HBVr with those who did not. We also explored the characteristics and seroconversion rates of HBV-vaccinated patients following transplantation. In total, 1299 SOT recipients were identified as having a resolved HBV infection at the time of transplantation. Thirty-nine patients experienced HBVr. Pre-transplant HB surface antibodies (anti-HBs) positivity and allograft rejection within 3 months after transplantation were independently associated with HBVr. Among the 17 HBV-vaccinated patients, 14 (82.4%) received three or fewer vaccine doses, and 13 (76.5%) had seroconversion with positive anti-HBs results. Pre-transplant anti-HBs(-) status and allograft rejection were risk factors for HBVr in SOT recipients with a resolved HBV infection, and HBV vaccination after transplantation resulted in a high rate of anti-HBs seroconversion. HBV vaccination after transplantation should be considered to reduce the HBVr risk.

Abatacept retention and clinical effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting in Taiwan

AIM

To evaluate real-world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real-world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%-66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD-naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow-up (6.1%). Abatacept was well-tolerated with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

The 24-month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting in Taiwan.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with and without immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) is a major concern for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using mFOLFOX6 regimen. There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of HAIC combined with immunotherapy in HCC patients with HBVr. The aim of this study was to examine the adverse events (AEs) related to HBVr in HCC patients after HAIC, with or without immunotherapy, and to assess the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis for HBVr.

METHODS

Medical records of HCC patients receiving HAIC combined with and without immunotherapy between January 2021 and June 2023 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received immunotherapy or not.

RESULTS

Out of the 106 patients, 32 (30.2%) developed HBVr. Among these, 23 eligible patients with HBVr were included, with 14 patients (61%) receiving immunotherapy and nine patients (39%) not receiving immunotherapy. Prior to HAIC treatment, four patients in each group had detectable HBV DNA with median titre of 3.66 × 102 IU/ml (patients with immunotherapy) and 1.98 × 102 IU/ml (patients without immunotherapy), respectively. Fifteen patients did not show detectable HBV DNA. At HBVr occurrence, the median HBV DNA level was 6.95 × 102 IU/ml for all patients, 4.82 × 102 IU/ml in patients receiving immunotherapy and 1.3 × 103 IU/ml in patients not receiving immunotherapy. Grade 3 hepatitis developed in 12 cases of all patients (12/23, 48%), including five patients with immunotherapy (56%) and seven patients without immunotherapy (78%). At the 3-month follow-up, HBV DNA was detected in 10 patients, with a median HBV DNA level of 2.05 × 102 IU/ml (range, 1.5 × 102- 3.55 × 102 IU/ml) in patients (7/10) with immunotherapy and 4.28 × 102 IU/ml (range, 1.15 × 102- 5.88 × 102 IU/ml) in patients (3/10) without immunotherapy. Intensified antiviral treatment was administered to all patients. No HBVr-related fatal events occurred.

CONCLUSION

HBVr can occur after HAIC combined with or without immunotherapy. The degree of liver damage did not differ significantly in patients treated with or without immunotherapy. Intensified antiviral treatment was found to be crucial for HCC patients with HBVr.

Acute acalculous cholecystitis due to hepatitis B virus reactivation: A case report and review of the literature

We report a 52-year old man presenting with acute acalculous cholecystitis triggered by hepatitis B virus infection. The patient developed protective antibodies and cleared the infection. The relevant data is also discussed.

Post-transplant hepatitis B virus reactivation impacts the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a dual-centre retrospective cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

Highly active hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to investigate the relationship between HBV status and HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation in two centres between January 2015 and December 2020. The authors reviewed post-transplant HBV status and its association with outcomes.

RESULTS

The prognosis of recipients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reappearance ( n =58) was poorer than those with HBsAg persistent negative ( n =351) and positive ( n =53). In HBsAg persistent positive group, recipients with HBV DNA reappearance or greater than 10-fold increase above baseline had worse outcomes than those without ( P <0.01). HBV reactivation was defined as (a) HBsAg reappearance or (b) HBV DNA reappearance or greater than 10-fold increase above baseline. After propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate after liver transplantation in recipients with HBV reactivation were significantly lower than those without (32.0% vs. 62.3%; P <0.01, and 16.4% vs. 63.1%; P <0.01, respectively). Moreover, HBV reactivation was significantly related to post-transplant HCC recurrence, especially lung metastasis. Cox regression analysis revealed that beyond Milan criteria, microvascular invasion and HBsAg-positive graft were independent risk factors for post-transplant HBV reactivation, and a novel nomogram was established accordingly with a good predictive efficacy (area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve=0.78, C-index =0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients with HBV reactivation had worse outcomes and higher tumour recurrence rates than those without. The nomogram could be used to evaluate the risk of post-transplant HBV reactivation effectively.

Preventing viral relapse with prophylactic tenofovir in hepatitis B carriers receiving chemotherapy: a phase IV randomized study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of shorter vs. longer tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) prophylaxis in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse in cancer patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This phase IV, prospective randomized trial enrolled cancer patients with CHB from 2014 to 2019 in Taiwan. Included patients were randomized to receive either 24- (Arm A) or 48-week (Arm B) post-chemotherapy TDF and compared for cumulative incidence of virological and clinical relapse. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine the factors associated with HBV relapse.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were randomized, and 41 patients in Arm A and 46 in Arm B completed the TDF treatment. No significant difference was found in cumulative incidence of virological relapse (Arm A: 94.4%, Arm B: 93.1%, p = 0.110) or clinical relapse among patients with baseline HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL (Arm A: 38.9%, Arm B: 26.7%, p = 0.420) between the two arms. High baseline HBV DNA ≥ 10,000 IU/mL (OR = 51.22) and HBsAg ≥ 1000 IU/mL (OR = 8.64) were independently associated with an increased virological relapse. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum phosphorus, vitamin D, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The 24-week preventative TDF has comparable efficacy to the 48-week treatment in virologic and clinical relapse. High baseline HBsAg or HBV DNA is associated with a higher risk of HBV relapse. These findings imply a 24-week duration of TDF treatment with a close monitor for patients with a high baseline viral load. Hepatitis B virus infection is a prominent cause of liver cancer and chronic liver disease and affected millions of people worldwide. When HBV-infected people are exposed to immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy for cancer, the chance of HBV reactivation rises considerably. This trial showed 24-week tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) may be sufficient for preventing HBV relapse in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02081469.

Consensus Guidelines: Best Practices for the Prevention, Detection and Management of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Clinical Trials with Immunosuppressive/Immunomodulatory Therapy

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) during and after immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory (IS/IM) therapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including hepatic decompensation and acute liver failure. The risk of HBVr with IS/IM has been heterogeneous and often unpredictable. As a result, patients with active or previous HBV infection are often excluded from clinical drug trials of such agents. Thorough screening for HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis, and careful monitoring for HBVr have proven to be effective in reducing the rate of HBVr and improving its outcome in the context of IS/IM. Therefore, safe enrollment and management of certain HBV-marker-positive patients in clinical trials is possible. There is a great, unmet need for consistent, evidence-based recommendations for best practices pertaining to enrollment, monitoring, and management of HBVr in clinical trial participants receiving IS/IM. The aim of these consensus guidelines is to provide a step-by-step blueprint to safely enroll, monitor and manage the patient with inactive chronic or resolved HBV in IS/IM clinical trials from the time of screening through to the end of post-treatment follow up.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation with Immunosuppression: A Hidden Threat?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in the setting of immunosuppressive therapy is an increasingly recognized and preventable cause of elevated liver enzymes and clinical hepatitis in treated patients. However, not all immunosuppressive therapies confer the same risk. The purpose of this article was to review the literature on risks of HBV reactivation associated with immunosuppressive agents and propose a management algorithm. We searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and MEDLINE for studies related to hepatitis B reactivation and various immunosuppressive agents. The risk of HBV reactivation was found to differ by agent and depending on whether a patient had chronic HBV (HBsAg+) or past HBV (HBsAg-, anti-HBc+). The highest risk of reactivation (>10%) was associated with anti-CD20 agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Multiple societies recommend HBV-specific anti-viral prophylaxis for patients with positive HBsAg prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, while the guidance for HBsAg- patients is more variable. Clinicians should check HBV status prior to beginning an immune-suppressive therapy. Patients with positive HBsAg should be initiated on antiviral prophylaxis in the majority of cases, whereas HBsAg- individuals should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Further research is required to determine the optimum duration of therapy.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Hepatic Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic dysfunction is a morbid complication of lung transplantation. Little is known about risk factors for postoperative hepatic dysfunction or its impact on survival after lung transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of 1406 adult lung transplant recipients was performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania between January 1, 2007 and December 1, 2019. Patients were excluded for redo lung transplantation, concomitant cardiac surgery, or concurrent solid organ transplantation. Postoperative liver dysfunction was classified as either ischemic liver injury or nonischemic dysfunction (transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia).

RESULTS

Among the 1155 primary lung transplant recipients included, postoperative hepatic dysfunction developed in 96 (8.3%) after lung transplantation. A history of liver disease was the greatest predictor of postoperative hepatic dysfunction (odds ratio, 6.19; CI, 2.13-17.4; P < .001). Patients with postoperative hepatic dysfunction had a greater need for intraoperative blood products (ischemic, 12 U [range, 6-21 U]; nonischemic, 10 U [range, 4-28 U]; vs none, 4 U [range, 1-12 U]; P < .001) and an increased need for postoperative circulatory support (ischemic, 16 [76%]; nonischemic, 25 [33%]; none, 117 [11%]; P < .001). Both ischemic liver injury and nonischemic dysfunction were associated with diminished 1-, 3-, and 5-year term survival (ischemic, 27.5%, 16.5%, and 0%, respectively; nonischemic, 60%, 49.6%, and 46.9%, respectively; none, 87.3%, 72.3%, and 59.5%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic dysfunction after lung transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A history of liver disease was the best positive predictor for postoperative dysfunction. Additional studies are necessary to identify the best treatment algorithm to avoid hepatic dysfunction more effectively in the postoperative setting after lung transplantation.

Sequential Use of High-Volume Plasma Exchange and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute Liver Failure: A Case Report

Background

Acute liver failure (ALF) may represent an indication for liver transplantation (LT). However, in patients who do not meet the criteria or who have contraindications for LT, support measures remain indicated since they may improve survival. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be considered in the presence of hyperammonemia, 3 times above the upper normal limit, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE), even in the absence of the classic indications. High-volume plasma exchange (HVPE) is an artificial liver support system with proven benefits in ALF, allowing ammonia and inflammatory mediator clearance. Both techniques, HVPE and CRRT, are associated with an increase in transplant-free survival.

Case Summary

We share a case of a 51-year-old male, without relevant personal history, diagnosed with severe acute hepatitis B which progressed to ALF, with grade IV HE (West-Haven criteria) and hyperammonemia (423 μg/dL). Due to the simultaneously diagnosed malignant neoplasm, he was not a candidate for LT. After refractory to medical therapy, HVPE was started, followed by CRRT. There was a significant improvement in liver tests, allowing surgical treatment of malignancy. After recovery, the patient returned to his everyday life.

Conclusion

The authors present a successful case in which an early and invasive approach to ALF was revealed to be a game changer. The lack of response to the measures instituted, as well as the contraindication for LT, motivated the institution of HVPE and CRRT. Both techniques proved to be an asset, allowing complete clinical recovery, reaffirming their role in ALF.

Universal Viral Screening of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the United States: A Cost-efficiency Evaluation

Recommendations for universal screening of patients with cancer for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are inconsistent. A recent multisite screening study (S1204) from the SWOG Cancer Research Network found that a substantial number of patients with newly diagnosed cancer had previously unknown viral infections. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-efficiency of universal screening of patients with newly diagnosed cancer. We estimated the cost-efficiency of universal screening of new cancer cases for HBV, HCV, or HIV, expressed as cost per virus detected, from the health care payer perspective. The prevalence of each virus among this cohort was derived from S1204. Direct medical expenditures included costs associated with laboratory screening tests. Costs per case detected were estimated for each screening strategy. Secondary analysis examined the cost-efficiency of screening patients whose viral status at cancer diagnosis was unknown. Among the possible options for universal screening, screening for HBV alone ($581), HCV alone ($782), HBV and HCV ($631) and HBV, HCV, and HIV ($841) were most efficient in terms of cost per case detected. When screening was restricted to patients with unknown viral status, screening for HBV alone ($684), HBV and HCV ($872), HBV and HIV ($1,157), and all three viruses ($1,291) were most efficient in terms of cost per newly detected case. Efficient viral testing strategies represent a relatively modest addition to the overall cost of managing a patient with cancer. Screening for HBV, HCV, and HIV infections may be reasonable from both a budget and clinical standpoint.

SIGNIFICANCE

Screening patients with cancer for HBV, HCV, and HIV is inconsistent in clinical practice despite national recommendations and known risks of complications from viral infection. Our study shows that while costs of viral screening strategies vary by choice of tests, they present a modest addition to the cost of managing a patient with cancer.

Host immunity and HBV S gene mutation in HBsAg-negative HBV-infected patients

Background

Clinically, some patients whose HBsAg becomes negative owing to antiviral therapy or spontaneously still show a low level of HBV DNA persistence in serum. T-lymphocyte subsets, cytokine levels and HBV S gene sequences were analyzed in this study.

Methods

A total of 52 HBsAg-negative and HBV DNA-positive patients(HBsAg-/HBV DNA+ patients), 52 persistently HBsAg-positive patients(HBsAg+/HBV DNA+ patients) and 16 healthy people were evaluated. T-lymphocyte subsets of these patients were detected by flow cytometry, serum cytokines and chemokines were detected by the Luminex technique, and the HBV S region was evaluated by Sanger sequencing. T%, T-lymphocyte, CD8+ and CD4+T lymphocyte were lower in the HBsAg-negative group than in the HC group. Compared with the HBsAg-positive group, the HBsAg-negative group had lower levels in T lymphocyte %, CD8+T lymphocyte %, CD8+T lymphocyte and CD4/CD8. These difference were statistically significant (P<0.05). Serum IFN-γ, IFN-α and FLT-3L levels were significantly higher in the HBsAg-negative group than in the HBsAg-positive group (P<0.05). However, levels of many cytokines related to inflammation (i.e., IL-6, IL-8, IL10, IL-12, IL-17A) were lower in the HBsAg-negative group. Fifty-two HBsAg-negative samples were sequenced, revealing high-frequency amino acid substitution sites in the HBV S protein, including immune escape mutations (i.e., Y100C, S114T, C124Y, P127L, G130R, T131N, M133T, C137S, G145A) and TMD region substitutions (i.e., E2K/R/D, G7D/R, G10D, A17R, F20L/S, L21V, L22V).

Conclusions

According to the results of T-lymphocyte subsets and serum cytokines, it can be deduced that the cellular immune function of HBsAg-negative patients is superior to that of HBsAg-positive patients, with attenuation of liver inflammation. HBsAg-negative patients may show a variety of mutations and amino acid replacement sites at high frequency in the HBV S region, and these mutations may lead to undetectable HBsAg, HBsAg antigenic changes or secretion inhibition.

Efficacy of Antiviral Prophylaxis up to 6 or 12 Months From Completion of Rituximab in Resolved Hepatitis B Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Rituximab occasionally induces reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with resolved HBV, at times with fatal consequences. The optimal duration of prophylactic antiviral therapy in this situation is unclear. We aimed to investigate the difference in HBV reactivation according to the duration of prophylactic tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with resolved HBV and receiving rituximab.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, prospective study was conducted in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and anti-HBc-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy. A total of 90 patients were randomized and received prophylactic TDF from the initiation of rituximab until 6 months (the 6-month group) or 12 months (the 12-month group) after the completion of rituximab. The primary outcome was the difference in HBV reactivation and the secondary outcomes were the difference in hepatitis flare and adverse events between the two groups.

RESULTS

In an intention to treat (ITT) analysis, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 of 43 patients (2.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-12%) at a median of 13.3 months in the 6-month group and 2 of 41 patients (4.9%; 95% CI, 1.4-16%) at a median of 13.7 months in the 12-month group. In a per protocol (PP) analysis, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 of 18 patients (5.6%; 95% CI, 0.99-26%) at 13.3 months in the 6-month group and 1 of 13 patients (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33%) at 9.7 months in the 12-month group. The cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation was not significantly different between the two groups in ITT and PP analyses (P = 0.502 and 0.795, respectively). The occurrence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups in ITT (9.3% in the 6-month group, 22.0% in the 12-month group, P = 0.193) and PP analyses (5.6% in the 6-month group, 7.7% in the 12-month group, P > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic TDF up to 6 months after completion of rituximab-based chemotherapy is sufficient in terms of the efficacy and safety of reducing HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02585947.

Hypogammaglobulinemia, a new risk factor for hepatitis B virus reactivation : about two cases

Reactivation of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) with immunosuppressive status has been well established, mainly due to medications such as immunosuppressive therapy like cytotoxic chemotherapy, rituximab and biologic therapy, immunosuppression after solid and bone-marrow transplantation or long-term corticosteroids therapy. We report here two cases of HBV reactivation due to global hypogammaglobulinemia. Regular HBV serologic screening and PCR for HBV-DNA should be applied for each patient with primary immunosuppressive status and history of chronic HBV infection. The necessity of a preemptive treatment remains debated.

Overlooked complication of Cushing's syndrome: Reactivation of hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE

Individuals infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) are at increased risk of reactivation when they receive immunosuppressive therapies. Although exogenous corticosteroid use as immunosuppressive therapy is elaborated in current guidelines on HBV reactivation, Cushing's syndrome (CS) with endogenous hypercortisolemia is not addressed. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of HBV infection and discuss the necessity of antiviral prophylaxis in patients with CS as in other immunosuppressed patients.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We included 72 patients with CS (Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) dependent or independent) who were screened for HBV between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized into three groups: overt, mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), and remission according to the cortisol burden. Changes in patients' HBV serology and clinical findings over time were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients had overt hypercortisolism, 18 had mild autonomous cortisol secretion and 28 patients were in remission. Nineteen (26.3%) patients were anti-HBc IgG positive, 4 of them were chronic HBV and 15 were isolated anti-HBc IgG positive. HBsAg was positive in four (5.5%) of the patients, who were all compatible with inactive chronic HBV. While two patients developed HBV reactivation, HBV flare was observed in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Since it is not always possible to achieve rapid remission in CS and these patients have long-term hypercortisolemia, we suggest that consensus should be reached on HBV serological assessment, standardization of follow-up, and planning of HBV prophylaxis in required instances in patients with CS especially in regions with a high prevalence of HBV infection.

Immune predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion in patients with hepatitis B reactivation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion is sometimes observed in hepatitis B reactivation (rHBV), probably due to immune resetting and differentiation.

AIMS

To investigate sequential immune differentiation and abrogation of tolerance in patients with rHBV who achieved HBsAg seroconversion.

METHODS

We included 19 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHBV; HBV DNA log10^3-8 ), 67 with rHBV (raised ALT [>5XULN], HBV DNAlog10^4-8 ) and 10 healthy controls. Immune differentiation, tolerance and functional status of CD4, CD8, T regulatory cells (Tregs), B cells and follicular T helper (Tfh) cells were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks, 81% rHBV (n = 67) lost HBV DNA and HBeAg (41%), and 12 (19%) lost HBsAg and made anti-HBs titers >10 IU/ml. rHBV patients had higher Th1/17, T_EM , Tfh, Tfh1/17, plasma and ATM B cells, and lower Tregs, Th2, Th17 and TEMRA expression. rHBV showed lower PD1, TIM3, LAG3, SLAM and TOX compared to CHBV. There was a significant increase in CD8, CD8EM, Tfh, Tfh1/17 and plasma B cells in seroconverters than non-seroconverters. At 24 weeks, we also observed increased plasma B cell frequency in seroconverters. While non-seroconverters showed higher expression of PD1, TIM3, LAG3, SLAM and TOX on CD4/CD8 T cells, blockade of PD1, TIM3, LAG3 and CTLA4 significantly enhanced IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-21 expression on CD4/CD8 and Tfh cells in non-seroconverters.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-seroconverters have increased inhibitory markers on CD4/CD8 T cells. There is a critical play of CD8, Tfh and B cells and subsets in seroclearance, along with checkpoint molecules as a potential therapy for non-seroconverters in HBV infection.

The many faces and pathologic diagnostic challenges of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory liver disease, characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of specific autoantibodies, and typical abnormalities in liver histology. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are necessary for both chronic and acute onset AIH to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease or fatal liver failure. However, the diagnosis of AIH is challenging mainly because of its heterogeneous clinical, serological and pathological features. Although portal lymphoplasmacytosis and interface hepatitis are the most typical histological features of AIH, many other histological features can be observed in AIH, including emperipolesis, hepatocyte rosettes, and Kupffer cell hyaline globules. Recent studies have questioned emperipolesis and hepatocyte rosette formation as typical features of AIH, and atypical clinical and histological presentations have also been recognized. This led an international working group to propose the modified AIH diagnostic criteria. However, it is well recognized that there are no pathognomonic characteristics that can be used to diagnose AIH and careful clinicopathological correlation is required to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the histological features of AIH, its varied histopathologic spectrum, recent updates and major differential diagnoses in routine clinical practice.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors: a retrospective study of pharmacovigilance databases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Recently, there have been clinical reports of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) related with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there were no studies to investigate the association between HBVr and different JAK inhibitors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective review utilizing the FAERS pharmacovigilance database and a systematic literature search for all cases of HBVr reported with JAK inhibitors. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data detection to screen the suspected HBVr after the administration of different JAK inhibitors, based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance database from Q4 2011 to Q1 2022.

RESULTS

There were a total number of 2097 (0.02%) reports of HBVr in FAERS, of which 41 (1.96%) were associated with JAK inhibitors. Baricitinib appeared to have the strongest signal among four JAK inhibitors, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-11.89). Ruxolitinib also showed signals, whereas no signals were detected among Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

While there may be an association between JAK inhibitors and HBVr, it appears to be a numerically uncommon occurrence. Further studies are needed to optimize the safety profiles of JAK inhibitors.

The Impact of b/tsDMARD Dose Reduction on Chronic Hepatitis B in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Two-Center Long-Term Safety Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the change of hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads and HBV reactivation (HBVr) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after tapering the dose of biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).

METHODS

This two-center analysis retrospectively investigated the virological and biochemical evidence of HBVr in RA patients who underwent b/tsDMARD dose reduction. Serum levels of viral loads were determined using real-time PCR. Serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT) were determined using spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

Among a total of 40 HBsAg+ RA patients who tapered b/tsDMARDs, 14 (35%) used tocilizumab; 12 (30%) used tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors; and the rest used either abatacept or tofacitinib. We found that patients who had detectable HBV DNA before tapering achieved a one-log reduction in HBV DNA levels, in contrast to the findings in the other 12 patients who did not taper b/tsDMARDs (no change in HBV DNA levels with time). The incidence of HBVr (increased viral loads with hepatitis) was 4.62 (95%CI: 2.08, 10.28) and 2.26 (95%CI: 0.56, 9.02) events per 100 person-years before and after b/tsDMARD tapering, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBV viral load decreased after the tapering of b/tsDMARDs in RA patients with detectable HBV DNA. Dose reduction in b/tsDMARDs might be beneficial.

Outcome of nucleos(t)ide analog cessation in patients with treatment for prevention of or against hepatitis B virus reactivation

AIM

We retrospectively investigated patients with administration of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) for prevention of or against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, and their clinical outcomes after cessation of the NA.

METHODS

We enrolled 180 patients who were positive for HBsAg when they started immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy and an NA was administered to prevent HBV reactivation (HBV carrier group), and 82 patients with resolved HBV infection who started administration of an NA after HBV reactivation (de novo HBV group). Cessation of the NA depended on each physician's judgment without definite criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients in the HBV carrier group and 22 in the de novo HBV group stopped NA therapy. In the HBV carrier group, 16 patients experienced virological relapse, which was defined as HBV DNA levels ≥20 IU/ml, and one with hematological disease had an alanine aminotransferase flare after cessation of NA. Of the 16 patients, the NA was reintroduced in three, whereas, the remaining 13 had low levels of HBV DNA and no alanine aminotransferase flare. In the de novo HBV group, virological relapse occurred in six patients, and one with hematological disease had an alanine aminotransferase flare after cessation of the NA. The NA was reintroduced in four of the six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We may be able to consider to cease NA therapy proactively in HBV carriers and resolved patients with non-hematological disease, if their primary diseases are under remission after completion of immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy. However, careful follow up is necessary after stopping NA therapy.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with new classes of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and expert opinion

HBV reactivation (HBVr) can be prevented by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of HBVr associated with new classes of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies and developed guidance on NA prophylaxis. An expert panel reviewed the data and categorised the risk of HBVr associated with each class of drugs into low (<1%), intermediate (1-10%), and high (>10%). Our search uncovered 59 studies, including 3,424 HBsAg+ and 5,799 HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients, which met our eligibility criteria. Based on medium-high quality evidence, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cytokine inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies, and corticosteroids were associated with high HBVr risk in HBsAg+ patients; cytokine inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies, and corticosteroids with intermediate risk in HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients; and anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors with low risk in HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients. Provisional recommendations are provided for drugs with low quality evidence. NA prophylaxis is recommended when using drugs associated with a high HBVr risk, while monitoring with on-demand NAs is recommended for low-risk drugs - either approach may be appropriate for intermediate-risk drugs. Consensus on definitions and methods of reporting HBVr, along with inclusion of HBsAg+, and HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients in clinical trials, will be key to gathering reliable data on the risk of HBVr associated with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies.

Isolated anti-HBc is an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a poorly understood and aggressive malignancy with increasing incidence and mortality. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as one of the important risk factors of ICC. There are few reports focusing on whether isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (isolated anti-HBc, IAHBc) have prognostic role in ICC, while positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of ICC. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of IAHBc in ICC patients after curative resection, in order to identify those who have the high risk of ICC recurrence in the early stage.

METHODS

We divided 209 ICC patients who underwent curative resection into 4 groups: group I (n = 40), HBsAg (-)/antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) (-)/anti-HBc (+); group II (n = 70), HBsAg (+)/anti-HBc (-); group III (n = 55), HBsAg (-)/anti-HBs (+)/anti-HBc (+); and group IV (n = 44), HBsAg (-)/anti-HBc (-). We compared the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among these four groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 16.93 months (range 1-34.6 months). The 1- and 2-year RFS and OS rates were 60% and 42%, and 78% and 63% respectively in all patients. Compared to the whole non-IAHBc patients (group II + group III + group IV), IAHBc patients (group I) showed significantly lower RFS at 1 year (39.8% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.001) and 2 years (20.7% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.001). When compared to other three individual groups, IAHBc patients (group I) also had the lowest RFS. We did not find significant difference in OS among the four groups. Further multivariate analysis revealed that IAHBc was an independent risk factor of RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

IAHBc is an independent poor prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in ICC patients after curative resection.

Clinical usefulness of a novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay to determine the initiation of treatment for HBV reactivation

BACKGROUNDS

A fully automated, novel, high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of measuring HBcrAg, using that assay, to diagnose HBV reactivation in a multi-center setting, compared with ultra-high-sensitivity HBsAg (iTACT-HBsAg) and HBV DNA assays.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with HBV reactivation from 2008 to 2020 were enrolled in four hospitals. Serial serum specimens from the patients were assessed retrospectively for their HBcrAg levels by iTACT-HBcrAg (lower limit of detection; 2.0 log U/mL) and HBsAg levels by iTACT-HBsAg (lower limit of detection; 0.0005 IU/mL); these were compared to the HBV DNA levels. HBV reactivation was defined as detection of serum HBV DNA, including unquantifiable detection.

RESULTS

At HBV reactivation and/or thereafter, HBV DNA levels were quantified (≥ 1.3 log IU/mL) in the sera of 27 patients, and were below the level of quantification (< 1.3 log IU/mL) in the sera of 17 patients. Of the 27 patients with HBV reactivation and whose serum HBV DNA was quantified, the sera of 26 and 24 patients (96.3% and 88.9%) were positive by iTACT-HBcrAg and iTACT-HBsAg, respectively. HBcrAg was detectable by iTACT-HBcrAg before HBV DNA was quantifiable in 15 of the 27 patients. Of the 11 patients with HBV reactivation and undetectable HBcrAg by iTACT-HBcrAg at HBV reactivation and/or thereafter, 10 had unquantifiable HBV DNA and none developed HBV reactivation-related hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The iTACT-HBcrAg assay is useful for monitoring HBV reactivation to determine the initiation of treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues.

Improving Hepatitis B Vaccination Rates among At-risk Children and Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFai) may be at higher risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to improve HBV vaccination rates in seronegative children with IBD.

Methods

This QI initiative implemented an HBV vaccination strategy from September 2018 to March 2020 in patients with newly diagnosed IBD with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) <10 mIU/mL. The project aimed to (1) increase HBV vaccination rates in seronegative patients and (2) document immunogenicity after completing a three-dose vaccine series. Outcome measures included the percentage of seronegative patients who received HBV vaccines (dose 1 and three-dose series). Interventions included applying a standardized vaccination protocol, and creating a vaccine workflow in two clinical areas, previsit planning and stakeholder engagement.

Results

One hundred seventy-four children and adolescents with IBD were evaluated during the study period, and 132 (76%) were HBsAb negative. After plan-do-study-act (PDSA) 1, the proportion of eligible patients who received HBV vaccine dose 1 increased from a baseline of 7% to 100% and was sustained for over 12 months. During PDSA 2, the proportion of patients completing the three-dose vaccine series improved from a baseline of 0% to 82% (n = 100); among 93 children in this subgroup who had repeat serology performed, 86 (92%) demonstrated serologic evidence of HBV protection.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary approach applying QI methodology allowed for improved and sustained HBV vaccination rates in at-risk seronegative children and adolescents with IBD. A three-dose HBV vaccine series proved immunogenic in 92% of eligible patients.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation following treatment with abatacept: A retrospective study of international pharmacovigilance databases

BACKGROUND

Abatacept is a selective T-cell costimulation modulator approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. Reports were recently published on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients who were treated with abatacept. However, the literature is limited to case reports and series, and no study has investigated the relationship between HBVr and abatacept using extensive population-based databases.

METHODS

Using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we collected all cases of HBVr between Jan 1, 2006 and June 30, 2021, for abatacept and other drugs. Disproportionality was analysed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), which was considered significant when the lower limit of the 95% CI was >1. We also conducted a confirmatory analysis in the European pharmacovigilance database, EudraVigilance.

FINDINGS

During the study period, 77,669 adverse cases were reported for abatacept use. There were 2889 reports of HBVr with any drug during this period, of which 55 were reported with abatacept. The ROR for HBVr with abatacept was significantly elevated at 4·80 (95% CI 3·68-6·27). All 55 cases of HBVr with abatacept were reported as serious adverse events. Of them, six individuals were hospitalised and four died. Among 832 reports of HBVr with any drug in EudraVigilance, 43 were reported with abatacept; the ROR was 8·99 (95% CI 6·61-12·23).

INTERPRETATION

We identified a positive signal between abatacept exposure and HBVr. Future prospective studies should further confirm the relationship and provide evidence to develop strategies involving pre-treatment screening, monitoring, and utilisation of antiviral prophylaxis when using abatacept in patients with rheumatic diseases.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (xjh012019063).

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induced Hepatotoxicity; Gastroenterologists' Perspectives

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have promising clinical activity and are essential medications for patients with several malignancies. However, by deranging the immune system, these novel agents could lead to immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Hepatotoxicity with checkpoint inhibitors usually results in acute hepatitis or drug-induced liver injury. METHODS: This review article discusses the recent clinical evidence available regarding checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis and reviews an approach to their diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: ICIs have improved patients' outcomes with different forms of malignancy; however, ICIs-related liver damage is a clinically significant entity in these patients. All patients should be monitored carefully for IRAEs while undergoing treatment with ICIs.

Molecular characterization of hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolated from a pediatric case of acute lymphoid leukemia, with a delayed response to antiviral treatment: a case report

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is effectively used as the first-line antiviral for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adults and children older than 12 years. To date, no confirmed case of virologic breakthrough (VBT) in a pediatric case has been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we describe a case of a 5-year old, asymptomatically infected with HBV infection two months after chemotherapy for precursor B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although the 5-year old male is South African, his family originated from Guinea. At the end of the one-year follow-up, the infection progressed to chronic HBV infection, with a high viral load. At 36 weeks (8 months) post-treatment with lamivudine (LAM), there was a partial virologic response (PVR) and after 61 weeks (14 months), he was switched to TDF rescue monotherapy. Even with TDF treatment, he still experienced VBT and subsequent PVR. The full-length genome of HBV isolated 78 weeks after the switch to rescue TDF monotherapy was sequenced and belonged to genotype E. In addition to the LAM mutations (rtS256G and rtM267L), missense mutations in B-cell, T-cell, HLA class I and II-restricted epitopes emerged, which were to evade and escape host surveillance, leading to delayed viral clearance, persistence and disease progression. Two further events of VBT occurred between weeks 113 and 141 of TDF rescue-therapy. Viral loads and liver enzymes are normalizing progressively with long-term therapy.

CONCLUSION

Although the host immune reconstitution may be delayed, prolonged TDF treatment was effective in treating this pediatric case of HBV infection with VBT and PVR.

Anti-rheumatic drug-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation and preventive strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

To date, an estimated 3 million people worldwide have been infected with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Although anti-HBV therapies have improved the long-term survival profile of chronic carriers, viral reactivation still poses a significant challenge for preventing HBV-related hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and death. Immuno-modulating drugs, which are widely applied in managing rheumatic conditions, are commonly associated with HBV reactivation (HBVr) as a result of drug-induced immune suppression. However, there are few reports on the risk of HBVr and the medication management plan for HBV carriers, especially rheumatic patients. In this review, we summarize immuno-modulating drug-induced HBVr during rheumatoid therapy and its preventive strategies for HBVr-induced liver diseases, especially cirrhosis and HCC. These findings will assist with developing treatments for rheumatic patients, and prevent HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC.

Long-term safety of rituximab in rheumatic patients with previously resolved hepatitis B virus infection

Conflicting results can be found in the literature on the frequency of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) on rituximab (RTX) in rheumatic patients with previously resolved HBV (prHBV) infection. Here, we report the frequency of HBVr in a large historical cohort of caucasian rheumatic patients with prHBV receiving RTX. Registry data of rheumatic patients treated with RTX were retrospectively analysed. Demographic and clinical characteristics including evaluation of anti-HCV and HBV markers, annual HBV-DNA determination and aminotransferase levels assessed every three months, were recorded. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to compare the risk of being still under therapy at different time points in patients with or without prHBV infection. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between recorded variables and treatment discontinuation. A total of 311 patients treated with RTX, 44 (14.1%) with and 267 (85.9%) without prHBV were analysed. No significant difference between the two groups regarding demographic and clinical characteristics was observed. During RTX treatment, detectable HBV-DNA and reappearance of HBsAg in patients with prHBV (seroreversion) were never observed. Kaplan-Meier functions were similar in patients with or without prHBV infection which was not associated with RTX discontinuation neither at univariate nor at multivariate analysis. These data are in favor of the concept that patients with rheumatologic diseases have a very low risk of reactivation of the HBV infection under RTX treatment. However, future prospective studies, including a larger number of patients, are still necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Following Treatment of HNSCC With Cisplatin

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation is a known complication of intense immunosuppression with B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody therapy and transplantation immunosuppression. HBV reactivation has occurred following treatment with chemotherapy regimens for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. There are 2 prior case reports of HBV reactivation following cisplatin monotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we present a case of a 49-year-old Caucasian male with a past medical history of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). There are no consensus guidelines on how to define hepatitis B reactivation. There are guidelines on when to initiate prophylaxis with Entecavir while on immunosuppressive therapy with risk according to medication category and hepatitis B surface antigen/hepatitis B core antibody IgG serology. CDC recommends screening everyone. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) now with a recent update in 2020 recommends screening everyone. There is a definite role of immunosuppression in HBV reactivation, however, there is also direct enhancement by cisplatin of viral replication by creating endoplasmic reticulum stress which increases HBV DNA indirectly. Finally, cytotoxicity enhances HBV reactivation and immune reconstitution post withdrawing immunosuppressive treatment. Because of the effects of chemotherapy, aka cisplatin goes beyond immunosuppression-related reactivation of HBV, our recommendations are in line with CDC and ASCO to screen all patients for HBV before onset of chemotherapy and start Entecavir/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate before the onset of chemotherapy for HBV-positive patients.

A case of reactivation of hepatitis B presenting with exudative ascites

Hepatitis B virus infection is a global problem and causes several liver diseases including acute and chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Though uncommon, some immune mediated extra-hepatic manifestations may develop during the infection. Exudative ascites during HBV infection is one such.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation: overview and management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can hide in the liver in the form of covalently closed circular DNA. When the body’s immunity changes, HBV reactivation (HBV-R) can occur. The risk of HBV-R is determined by the complex interaction among virological factors, medication factors and host factors. However, many patients do not know that they are infected with HBV, and doctors often do not invest enough time to systematically evaluate the patient’s HBV-R risk factors before immunosuppressive treatment. Therefore, HBV clinical screening should be vigorously promoted to achieve early detection and early prevention for patients with high risk of HBV-R. The mechanism, clinical features, risk factors, HBV-R under different disease etiologies, prevention and treatment of HBV-R were summarized to improve the in-depth understanding and awareness.

Kinetics of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with rheumatic disease and chronic hepatitis B receiving biologic agents

The effect of biologic treatment on quantitative Hepatitis B surface Antigen (qHBsAg) levels and HBsAg clearance in rheumatic patients with chronic HBV infection has not been well studied. We prospectively followed rheumatic patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (n = 28) treated with biologics and oral antivirals, categorized into patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB, group A n = 13) and chronic HBV infection (group B n = 15) and matched them to appropriate non-rheumatic controls. qHBsAg kinetics were serially measured and compared between groups. No HBV reactivation (HBVr) was recorded during the 108.25 patient-year follow-up. Among patients with CHB, the annual rapid qHBsAg decline (i.e. decline >0.5 log₁₀  IU/mL/year) as well as HBsAg clearance did not differ between rheumatic patients [n = 4 (32.7%), n = 1 (7.7%)] and controls [n = 6 (28.4%), p = .726 and n = 2 (7.7%), p = .818, respectively]. In contrast, there was a slower annual qHBsAg decline in rheumatic patients with chronic HBV compared to non-rheumatic controls (-0.04 vs -0.13 log₁₀  IU/mL at year 1, p = .019) with no cases of rapid qHBsAg decline or HBsAg clearance in rheumatic patients (0%) compared to a cumulative incidence of 24% and a rate of 20%, respectively in controls. In biologic-treated rheumatic patients with HBeAg-negative HBV receiving antiviral prophylaxis, there was slower qHBsAg decline, lower cumulative rates of rapid qHBsAg decline and HBsAg clearance compared to non-rheumatic controls.

A multi-center evaluation of hepatitis B reactivation with and without antiviral prophylaxis after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive kidney transplant recipients ranges between 1.4-9.6%. Limited evidence is available regarding routine antiviral prophylaxis and identifiable risk factors for HBV reactivation in this population.

METHODS

In this multi-center retrospective study, we evaluated the prevalence of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant recipients who did or did not receive antiviral prophylaxis. The primary outcome assessed the prevalence of HBV reactivation, defined as a positive HBV DNA by PCR of any viral load at or above the minimal detection level. The principal safety outcomes assessed 1-year graft survival, 1-year all-cause mortality, biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), and antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

RESULTS

One-hundred sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria and comprised of two groups, antiviral prophylaxis (n=14) and no antiviral prophylaxis (n=147). Of patients who did not receive prophylaxis only five (3.4%) experienced HBV reactivation whereas one (7.1%) patient in the prophylaxis group experienced reactivation over a median follow-up of 1103 days (p= 0.43). Furthermore, there were no differences with respect to all secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis demonstrated delayed graft function to be a significant factor associated with HBV reactivation.

CONCLUSION

These study results suggest that the prevalence of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant recipients is low, regardless of antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, there were no significant graft related outcomes among those that did experience reactivation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Considering a steady increase in the number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) worldwide and the significant proportion of the world’s population that has been exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV reactivation following allo-HSCT remains an important issue for post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Antiviral prophylaxis can reduce HBV replication, severity of HBV-related hepatitis, and mortality; therefore, identification of patients at risk is crucial. It is recommended that all recipients and donors should be screened for active or prior HBV infection, including HBsAg, antiHBc, and antiHBs. Adoptive immunity transfer from the donor seems to have protective effects against HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated in all HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients remain at risk; therefore, antiviral prophylaxis should be considered if baseline serum HBV DNA is detectable. In HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients without detectable HBV DNA, close monitoring of viral load with an on-demand therapy is necessary. Entecavir or tenofovir rather than lamivudine are more appropriate for the emergence of lamivudine resistance. The treatment duration remains unclear, with 6- to 12-month therapy after cessation of immunosuppressive therapy commonly recommended. Here we review the updated evidence and recent recommendations regarding HBV reactivation in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for individualized therapy.

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Cord Blood Collection for Stem Cell Use and Actual Perspectives

Objective: The aim of the current study is to assess the prevalence of hepatitis B and the risk of hepatitis reactivation in carriers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy for gynecologic and/or breast cancers in a single institution, during a period of five years, and to identify a relationship to some particular chemotherapy regimen, more prone to lead to reactivation. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all consecutive oncological patients treated for a gynecologic and/or breast cancers who presented for the first time to the Gynecologic Oncology Department of Filantropia Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, between January 2016 and December 2020. Results: A total of 1 895 patients diagnosed with ovarian, cervical, endometrial or breast cancers were admitted to hospital for systemic therapy during the mentioned period. Among these, only four patients (two patients with breast cancers, one cervical cancer and one endometrial carcinoma) were chronic carriers of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg positive). Patients received a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens including corticosteroids, gemcitabine, cisplatin, carboplatin, taxanes and anthracyclines. We report one reactivation that occurred in one occult carrier of hepatitis B virus diagnosed with breast cancer (HBsAg negative, hepatitis B core antibody positive - HBcAb), initially excluded from this study, as being screened negative for HBV, treated with taxanes-based chemotherapy and corticosteroids. Conclusion: HBV reactivation had a low incidence in our population of patients diagnosed with gynecologic or breast cancer who received systemic chemotherapy. The HBV reactivation risk was positively correlated with breast cancer and to taxanes-based regimens and glucocorticoids. Further studies to identify additional risk factors of HBV infection reactivation in gynecologic oncology patients and possible risk reducing measures are warranted.

Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología A.C. Clinical guideline on hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a worldwide public health problem. In Mexico, at least three million adults are estimated to have acquired hepatitis B (total hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive), and of those, 300,000 active carriers (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive) could require treatment. Because HBV is preventable through vaccination, its universal application should be emphasized. HBV infection is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Semi-annual liver ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein testing favor early detection of that cancer and should be carried out in all patients with chronic HBV infection, regardless of the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Currently, nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that have a high barrier to resistance are the first-line therapies.

Novel strategies for the early diagnosis of hepatitis B virus reactivation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation under systemic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy is a serious complication among HBV-resolved patients. Some medications, such as more than 2 weeks of corticosteroid therapy, can influence HBV reactivation; therefore, screening tests that measure hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody before therapy are required. Additionally, because HBV reactivation has been reported in patients positive for HBsAg treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prophylactic administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues prior to administering ICIs is recommended for HBsAg-positive patients. Under these circumstances, highly sensitive novel biomarkers are expected to be used for the early diagnosis of HBV reactivation. A fully automated high-sensitivity HBsAg assay (detection limit: 5 mIU/ml) by Lumipulse HBsAg-HQ, with 10-fold higher sensitivity than that of conventional assays, is currently used. Furthermore, ultra-sensitive HBsAg assays using a semi-automated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (ICT-CLEIA; detection limit: 0.5 mIU/ml) have been developed. Recently, a fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg; cut-off value: 2.1 Log U/mL) has been developed and reported. The utility of ICT-CLEIA and iTACT-HBcrAg for the diagnosis of HBV reactivation appears comparable to the use of HBV DNA. In this review, we provide the latest information related to medications that influence HBV reactivation and recently developed novel biomarkers that predict and monitor HBV reactivation.

HBeAg Levels Vary across the Different Stages of HBV Infection According to the Extent of Immunological Pressure and Are Associated with Therapeutic Outcome in the Setting of Immunosuppression-Driven HBV Reactivation

HBeAg is a marker of HBV-activity, and HBeAg-loss predicts a favorable clinical outcome. Here, we characterize HBeAg-levels across different phases of HBV infection, their correlation with virological/biochemical markers and the virological response to anti-HBV therapy. Quantitative HBeAg (qHBeAg, DiaSorin) is assessed in 101 HBeAg+ patients: 20 with acute-infection, 20 with chronic infection, 32 with chronic hepatitis and 29 with immunosuppression-driven HBV-reactivation (HBV-R). A total of 15/29 patients with HBV-R are monitored for >12 months after starting TDF/ETV. qHBeAg is higher in immunosuppression-driven HBV-R (median[IQR]:930[206-1945]PEIU/mL) and declines in chronic hepatitis (481[28-1393]PEIU/mL, p = 0.03), suggesting HBeAg production, modulated by the extent of immunological pressure. This is reinforced by the negative correlation between qHBeAg and ALT in acute infection (Rho = -0.66, p = 0.006) and chronic hepatitis (Rho = -0.35; p = 0.05). Interestingly, qHBeAg strongly and positively correlates with qHBsAg across the study groups, suggesting cccDNA as a major source of both proteins in the setting of HBeAg positivity (with limited contribution of integrated HBV-DNA to HBsAg production). Focusing on 15 patients with HBV-R starting TDF/ETV, virological suppression and HBeAg-loss are achieved in 60% and 53.3%. Notably, the combination of qHBeAg > 2000 PEIU/mL + qHBsAg > 52,000 IU/mL at HBV-R is the only factor predicting no HBeAg loss (HBeAg loss: 0% with vs. 72.7% without qHBeAg > 2000 PEIU/mL + qHBsAg > 52,000 IU/mL, p = 0.03). In conclusion, qHBeAg varies over the natural course of HBV infection, according to the extent of immunological pressure. In the setting of HBV-R, qHBeAg could be useful in predicting the treatment response under immunosuppression.

Risk of HBV reactivation in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is a promising treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether ICIs would have the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and the necessary of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) prophylaxis are still unclear. We aimed to investigate the role of NUCs prophylaxis in HBV-infected patients who underwent ICIs treatment.

Methods

The study was a retrospective prospective design to review and follow-up consecutive 62 patients with chronic hepatitis B or resolved HBV infection who had received ICIs treatment for the unresectable HCC. Of them, 60 patients with documented baseline serum HBV DNA value were classified into three categories according to the baseline HBV viral load and the status of antiviral therapy before ICI treatment. The clinical status, including tumor response, viral kinetics and liver function, was recorded and investigated.

Results

No HBV reactivation occurred in the 35 patients with HBV DNA ≤100 IU/mL on NUCs therapy. Of the 19 patients with HBV DNA >100 IU/mL who started NUCs simultaneously with ICI treatment, none encountered HBV reactivation during the immunotherapy. Of the six HBV patients without NUCs treatment, three had a greater than 1 log decrease in HBV viral load, and one maintained his serum HBV DNA in undetectable status during ICI treatment. Eventually, one out of six experienced HBV reactivation after 9 weeks of ICI treatment.

Conclusion

No patients on antiviral therapy developed HBV reactivation, and one out of six not receiving antiviral therapy had HBV reactivation. HBV viral load higher than 100 IU/mL is safe and not a contraindication for ICI treatment for HCC, if NUCs can be coadministrated.

Safety and efficacy of CAR-T cell targeting BCMA in patients with multiple myeloma coinfected with chronic hepatitis B virus

Background

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a well-recognized complication in patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection undergoing anticancer therapy. There is a risk of HBV reactivation after infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods

We administered B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T cell by infusion to nine patients with R/R MM with chronic or resolved HBV infection. Patient serum was analyzed to determine the expression of five components of HBV and the copy number of HBV DNA. HBV reactivation was defined if a patient re-exhibited hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA regrowth after CAR-T therapy.

Results

In one patient who was HBsAg-positive, no HBV reactivation was observed during the follow-up period of 9.8 months after administration of anti-HBV drugs before and after CAR-T therapy. Among eight patients with MM who had resolved HBV infection, two patients administered prophylactic anti-HBV drugs did not exhibit HBV reactivation. Of the six patients who did not use prophylactic antiviral drugs, five did not exhibit HBV reactivation, while one showed recurrence of HBsAg without detection of HBV DNA or damage to liver function. The best objective response rate was 100%, and the progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months was of 88.89% (median PFS was not observed).

Conclusions

These findings showed that BCMA CAR-T cell therapy could be used in patients with R/R MM with chronic or resolved HBV infection and that antiviral drugs should be administered in these patients during CAR-T cell therapy.