Growth and development of a new subspecialty: pediatric hepatology

Development of a national Zoom-based lectureship for pediatric transplant hepatology trainees

BACKGROUND

Previous publications identified a gap in standard education on topics related to advanced hepatology and liver transplantation for pediatric transplant hepatology trainees. The Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) Education Committee designed a Zoom-based lectureship series for all advanced pediatric transplant hepatology trainees. We aim to describe the educational series and feedback from fellow participants.

METHODS

Pediatric transplant hepatology trainees from across the United States and Canada were invited to attend 25 Zoom-based lectures on a broad list of topics pertaining to pediatric transplant hepatology. At the completion of the lectureship, a 53-item REDcap survey using single-answer, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions was distributed via email to all participants.

RESULTS

A total of 16 fellows from broad geographic areas responded to the survey. Nineteen percent (n = 3/16) of fellows attended all 25 lectures and 31% (n = 5/16) attended 16-20 lectures. Majority of fellows (88%, n = 14/16) reported the lecture series increased knowledge of liver disease, increased confidence in managing children with liver disease, and aided with board preparation. Additionally, over half of the fellows (81%, n = 13/16) reported the series served as a platform for networking and mentoring from peers and experts in the field. All fellows recommended the lecture series for future fellows.

CONCLUSION

The SPLIT educational lectureship for advanced pediatric transplant hepatology trainees provided a national education curriculum that not only led to increased knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of common conditions encountered in pediatric transplant hepatology but also provided a unique networking and mentorship environment.

Liver disease referrals to an urban, hospital-based hepatology outpatient clinic over the past 25 years

Background

Additional hepatologists are required to manage the rapidly increasing number of patients with liver disease. One disincentive to trainees considering a career in hepatology is the longstanding perception that outpatient hepatology consists largely of managing patients with alcohol‐induced liver disease (ALD).

Objectives

To document the types of liver diseases and changes in liver disease referrals to an urban outpatient liver disease clinic over the past 25 years.

Methods

The nature of the liver disorder, age, gender, and socioeconomic status of patients referred to an urban, hospital‐based, liver diseases outpatient program were documented from 1992 to 2017. Joinpoint analysis was performed to identify significant trends in referral prevalence rates of various disorders.

Results

In 1992/1993, hepatitis C virus (HCV), followed by hepatitis B virus (HBV), “other”, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) were the most common underlying liver diseases in referred patients (39, 36, 12, 4.5, and 3.5% respectively), whereas in 2016/2017, NAFLD, HBV, HCV, “other,” and ALD were most common (60, 15, 12, 8.7, and 3.3%, respectively). Aside from NAFLD referrals, which consistently increased over the 25‐year period, the prevalence of all other liver disease referrals fluctuated but generally declined. Recently referred patients were significantly older (38 ± 13 years in 1992/1993 and 49 ± 15 years in 2016/2017, P < 0.0001), while gender and socioeconomic status have not changed.

Conclusions

Hepatology is a diverse, dynamic subspecialty where ALD continues to constitute less than 5% of all patient referrals.

The coming of age of a young subspecialty: paediatric hepatology

Paediatric hepatology dates from the 1970s and it is the youngest of the organ-specific subspecialties. As then there have been impressive achievements in the fields of anatomical, metabolic, immunological and neoplastic diseases, and the advent of modern molecular biology has resulted in a marked increase in exact diagnoses. Liver transplants provided enormous stimulus for the discipline. Due to changing morbidity patterns, the discipline faces new challenges, such as environment- and lifestyle-induced liver diseases, but different forms of chronic viral hepatitis are diminishing.

CONCLUSION

High levels of competence require good clinical research, optimal results and a high degree of centralisation.

Functional characterization of ABCB4 mutations found in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3

Multidrug resistance 3 (MDR3), encoded by the ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 4 gene (ABCB4), localizes to the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes and translocates phosphatidylcholine from the inner leaflet to the outer leaflet of the canalicular membrane. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3) is a rare hepatic disease caused by genetic mutations of ABCB4. In this study, we characterized 8 ABCB4 mutations found in PFIC3 patients, using in vitro molecular assays. First, we examined the transport activity of each mutant by measuring its ATPase activity using paclitaxel or phosphatidylcholine. Then, the pathogenic mechanisms by which these mutations affect MDR3 were examined through immunoblotting, cell surface biotinylation, and immunofluorescence. As a result, three ABCB4 mutants showed significantly reduced transport activity. Among these mutants, one mutation A364V, located in intracellular domains, markedly decreased MDR3 expression on the plasma membrane, while the others did not affect the expression. The expression of MDR3 on the plasma membrane and transport activity of A364V was rescued by a pharmacological chaperone, cyclosporin A. Our study provides the molecular mechanisms of ABCB4 mutations and may contribute to the understanding of PFIC3 pathogenesis and the development of a mutation-specific targeted treatment for PFIC3.

Patterns of Change in ACGME-Accredited Residency Programs and Positions: Implication for the Adequacy of GME Positions and Supply of Physicians in the United States

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that the supply of primary care physicians and generalist physicians in other specialties may be inadequate to meet the needs of the US population. Data on the numbers and types of physicians-in-training, such as those collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), can be used to help understand variables affecting this supply.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed trends in the number and type of medical school graduates entering accredited residencies, and the impact those trends could have on the future physician workforce.

METHODS

Since 2004, the ACGME has published annually its data on accredited institutions, programs, and residents to help the graduate medical education community understand major trends in residency education, and to help guide graduate medical education policy. We present key results and trends for the period between academic years 2003-2004 and 2012-2013.

RESULTS

The data show that increases in trainees in accredited programs are not uniform across specialties, or the types of medical school from which trainees graduated. In the past 10 years, the growth in residents entering training that culminates in initial board certification ("pipeline" specialties) was 13.0%, the number of trainees entering subspecialty education increased 39.9%. In the past 5 years, there has been a 25.8% increase in the number of osteopathic physicians entering allopathic programs.

CONCLUSIONS

These trends portend challenges in absorbing the increasing numbers of allopathic and osteopathic graduates, and US international graduates in accredited programs. The increasing trend in subspecialization appears at odds with the current understanding of the need for generalist physicians.