Antegrade embolization of spontaneous splenorenal shunt for post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt refractory hepatic encephalopathy

Concurrent spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization for the prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Overt hepatic encephalopathy remains a serious complication after TIPS. Concomitant SPSS is associated with an increased risk of HE in patients treated with TIPS.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and safety of the prophylactic embolization of SPSS at the time of TIPS creation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2023 to identify studies on the association between antegrade embolized SPSS before TIPS placement and the incidence of post-TIPS HE. Odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were used to identify significant differences in the outcomes.

RESULTS

Four studies enrolling 1243 patients with cirrhosis who received TIPS for variceal bleeding were included. A meta-analysis revealed that TIPS without simultaneous SPSS embolization was associated with an increased risk of overt HE (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.32-4.38; p = 0.004). The risks of mortality (0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.07; p = 0.13), variceal rebleeding (0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34; p = 0.74) and shunt dysfunction (1.40, 95% CI 0.51-3.83; p = 0.51) did not significantly differ among the groups.

CONCLUSION

SPSS prevalence was associated with an increased risk of overt HE after TIPS. Concurrent antegrade SPSS embolization during TIPS creation reduced the risk for overt HE without increasing other complications.

To evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in decompensated cirrhosis patients and its prognostic significance

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are frequent in liver cirrhosis and their prevalence increases as liver function deteriorates, probably as a consequence of worsening portal hypertension, but without achieving an effective protection against cirrhosis complications. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of portosystemic shunts in liver cirrhosis patients and analyze its prognostic role.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective observational study, where 92 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were evaluated based on history, physical examination, biochemical tests and abdominal computed tomography (CT) angiography findings. A follow-up was done after six months for the development of cirrhosis-related complications.

RESULTS

Of the 92 cirrhotic patients, 57.6% had SPSS (large SPSS + small SPSS) detected by multi-detector computed tomographic angiography. Overall, we found large SPSS in 24 (26.1%) patients, small SPSS in 29 (31.5%) patients and no shunt in 39 (42.4%) patients. Among the shunts, the splenorenal shunt is the most frequent type (25, 27.2%) followed by the paraumbilical shunt (20.7%). Previous decompensating events, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastrointestinal bleed, were experienced more frequently by the large SPSS group followed by the small SPSS and without SPSS groups. Regarding follow-up, decompensating episodes of hepatic encephalopathy developed more frequently in patients with large SPSS (41.7%) than in patients with small SPSS (24.1%) followed by patients without SPSS (12.8%).

CONCLUSION

In summary, all cirrhotic patients should be studied with radiological imaging to detect the presence of portosystemic shunts. In several cases, patients with large SPSS had a more impaired liver function and more frequent complications of portal hypertension. So, these patients would probably benefit from a closer surveillance and more intensive therapy.

Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treatment of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis with or without spontaneous portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention for portal hypertensive complications in cirrhosis. Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) may increase the risk of post-TIPS complications and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TIPS for treating variceal bleeding between patients with and without SPSSs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 467 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who received TIPS for variceal bleeding from January 2012 to January 2018 were screened. A total of 33 patients with coexisting SPSSs were included as the SPSS group, and 33 patients without SPSSs were randomly selected as control. The procedure-related complications and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups were successfully treated with TIPS. SPSSs were antegradely embolized before TIPS placement. In terms of safety, one patient in the SPSS group experienced an asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, and another patient experienced serious gastric ulcer bleeding. Overall, 23 (70.0%) patients in the SPSS group and 16 (51.5%) patients in the control group experienced different mild complications (P=0.131). During a median follow-up of more than 2 years, the rebleeding rates (7.1 vs. 3.7% at 1 year, P=0.508), overt hepatic encephalopathy occurrence rates (34.4 vs. 39.4% at 2 years, P=0.685), and orthotopic liver transplantation-free survival rates (73.2 vs. 70.7% at 2 years, P=0.557) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TIPS combined with antegrade embolization is safe, effective, and feasible for patients with SPSSs, with safety and long-term outcomes comparable to patients without SPSSs.

Recent advances in hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy describes the array of neurological alterations that occur during acute liver failure or chronic liver injury. While key players in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy, such as increases in brain ammonia, alterations in neurosteroid levels, and neuroinflammation, have been identified, there is still a paucity in our knowledge of the precise pathogenic mechanism. This review gives a brief overview of our understanding of the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy and then summarizes the significant recent advances made in clinical and basic research contributing to our understanding, diagnosis, and possible treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. A literature search using the PubMed database was conducted in May 2017 using "hepatic encephalopathy" as a keyword, and selected manuscripts were limited to those research articles published since May 2014. While the authors acknowledge that many significant advances have been made in the understanding of hepatic encephalopathy prior to May 2014, we have limited the scope of this review to the previous three years only.