Better efficacy of a 12-month interferon alfa-2b retreatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after a 6-month treatment: a multicenter, controlled, randomized trial. Le Groupe D'étude et De Traitement du Virus De L'hépatite C (Get.Vhc)

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The widely-accepted treatment outcome for chronic hepatitis C is the sustained viral response (that is, no measurable viral RNA in blood six months after treatment). However, this surrogate outcome (as well as the previously employed biochemical and histologic ones) has never been validated. This situation exists because there are very few randomized clinical trials that have used clinical events (mortality or manifestations of decompensated cirrhosis) as outcomes, because those clinical events only occur after many years of infection. Patients in whom initial therapy fails to produce sustained viral responses do become potential candidates for retreatment; some of these individuals are not candidates for ribavirin or protease inhibitors and consideration could be given to retreatment with interferon alone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of interferon monotherapy retreatment in chronic hepatitis C patients and to validate the currently employed surrogate outcomes in this group of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until 16 August 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing interferon versus placebo or no treatment in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause and hepatic), quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were liver-related morbidity, sustained viral responses, biochemical responses, histologic improvements, and costs. We used both fixed-effect and random-effects model meta-analyses, reporting only the former if no difference existed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were identified. Two of them were at low risk of bias (the HALT-C and EPIC3 trials) and included 1676 patients. Both of these trials addressed the role of long-term low-dose pegylated interferon therapy in patients with severe fibrosis (demonstrated on liver biopsy) and were designed to assess the clinical outcomes. The remaining five trials included 300 patients and were at high risk of bias. Based on all trials reporting the outcomes, no significant difference was observed in either all-cause mortality (78/843 (9.3%) versus 62/867 (7.2%); risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.79; 3 trials) or hepatic mortality (41/532 (7.7%) versus 40/552 (7.2%); RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.63; 2 trials); however, when only the two trials at low risk of bias were combined, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the recipients of the pegylated interferon (78/828 (9.4%) versus 57/848 (6.7%); RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96) although trial sequential analysis could not exclude the possibility of random error. There was less variceal bleeding in the recipients of the interferon (4/843 (0.5%) versus 18/867 (2.1%); RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.67; 3 trials), although again trial sequential analysis could not exclude the presence of a type I error and the effect could not be confirmed in a random-effects model meta-analysis. No significant differences were seen with regard to the development of ascites, encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or the need for liver transplantation. One trial reported quality of life data; the pain score was significantly worse in the recipients of the pegylated interferon. Adverse effects tended to be more common in the interferon recipients; the ones that were significantly more common included hematologic complications, infections, flu-like symptoms, and rash. The recipients of interferon had significantly more sustained viral responses (20/557 (3.6%) versus 1/579 (0.2%); RR 15.38, 95% CI 2.93 to 80.71; 4 trials) and a type I error was excluded by trial sequential analysis. The METAVIR activity score also improved (36/55 (65%) versus 20/46 (43.5%); RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.18; 2 trials). No significant differences were seen with regard to histologic fibrosis assessments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data were limited to patients with histologic evidence of severe fibrosis who were retreated with pegylated interferon. In this scenario, retreatment with interferon did not appear to provide significant clinical benefit and, when only the trials at low risk of bias were considered, retreatment for several years may even have increased all-cause mortality. Such treatment also produced adverse events. On the other hand, the treatment did result in improvement in some surrogate outcomes, namely sustained viral responses and histologic evidence of inflammation. Interferon monotherapy retreatment cannot be recommended for these patients. No clinical data are available for patients with less severe fibrosis. The sustained viral response cannot be used as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C treatment in this clinical setting with low sustained viral response rates and needs to be validated in others in which higher sustained viral response rates are reported.

Virological responses of pegylated interferon alpha-2a treatment in hemodialysis patients infected with hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is the most frequently encountered hepatic disease in dialysis patients. Data related to pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN-α-2a) use in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Peg-IFN-α-2a among these patients.

METHODS

Forty-one IFN-naive hemodialysis patients infected by HCV were assessed. All patients had positive anti-HCV antibody and positive HCV-RNA. Peg-IFN-α-2a 135 mcg/week was given for 48 weeks. Biochemical and virological responses were evaluated at treatment weeks 12, 24, 48, and 72.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of the 41 patients who completed the treatment enrolled in the study. Mean age of the 38 patients was 38.1 (range 23-65) years, and the study group was predominantly male (65.8 %). There was no statistically significant difference in mean age, gender, mean duration of hemodialysis, HCV infection, patient numbers with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values and mean ALT, platelet, and HCV-RNA values between patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) and those who did not. Only the Knodell histology activity index correlated with SVR (P = 0.048). Biochemical and virological response rates at the 12th week (early response) were 94.7 % and 60.5 %, respectively. The 34 (89.5 %) patients achieved biochemical response at the end of therapy (48th week); 24 (63.2 %) remained HCV-RNA negative. At the 72nd week, biochemical and virological response rates were 84.2 % and 50 %, respectively.

DISCUSSION

According to results of this study, patients achieved good sustained viral and biochemical response rates with Peg-IFN-α-2a treatment. Histology activity index may be a predictor for SVR; but large randomized controlled trials are needed. Weekly 135 mcg dose of Peg-IFN-α-2a for 48 weeks is an effective treatment in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients.

Elevation of serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase activity is frequent in chronic hepatitis C, and is associated with insulin resistance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level is often increased in patients with chronic hepatitis C, and we aimed to identify factors associated with this phenomenon in patients completely abstinent from alcohol (teetotaller).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

71 teetotaller patients have been identified by personal history, questioning of relatives, CAGE questionnaire administration and unscheduled alcoholemia measurements.

RESULTS

39 patients (55%) had elevated (>50IU/L) gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level. Body mass index, insulin and C-peptide level, insulin resistance, piecemeal necrosis score > or =3, fibrosis score > or =2 and steatosis score > or =1 were significantly higher in these patients than in those (n=32) with normal gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. At multiple linear regression analysis gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level was associated with C-peptide level, insulin resistance and histopathologic grading. At multiple logistic regression analysis, C-peptide level (OR=2.13) and piecemeal necrosis score > or =3 (OR=4.59) were the only factors independently associated with elevated gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. Sustained virological response during pegylated interferon plus ribavirine treatment was achieved by 97% and 49% patients with normal and elevated gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, respectively (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level is often elevated in chronic hepatitis C and is associated with metabolic and inflammatory factors; this phenomenon may contribute to explain and to predict resistance to treatment in this subgroup of patients.

A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens

Characteristics for an optimal liver biopsy specimen were recently defined as 20 to 25 mm long and/or containing more than 11 complete portal tracts (CPTs). A systematic review of percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) and transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) series yielded only 32 PLB studies in which these characteristics were evaluated: mean +/- SD length, 17.7 +/- 5.8 mm and number of CPTs, 7.5 +/- 3.4; and 15 TJLB studies: mean +/- SD length, 13.5 +/- 4.5 mm and number of CPTs, 6.8 +/- 2.3. Studies of sampling heterogeneity and intraobserver and interobserver variability also used inadequate specimens by present standards. Only 11 (5.3%) of 207 therapeutic studies for chronic hepatitis B and C documented length and/or number of CPTs. Of the current 12 studies evaluating noninvasive fibrosis tests, only 8 documented length or number of CPTs, and only 1 documented length and number of CPTs. New studies are needed based on adequate liver biopsy samples to provide reliable estimation of grading and staging in chronic liver disease.

Twenty-four hour kinetics of hepatitis C virus and antiviral effect of alpha-interferon

Numerous studies reported that patients infected by the genotype 1 of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or with a high baseline viral load responded poorly to antiviral therapy. Study of viral kinetics has provided clues to the understanding of non-response to alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha)-based therapy. The objective of this study was to clarify the influence of viral factors such as the genotype and baseline viral load on HCV resistance to treatment through the study of their impact on the first phase of viral decline. HCV RNA levels were determined frequently following the administration of 3 million units of IFN-alpha in 22 chronic HCV carriers. The evolution of HCV RNA level over 24 hr was different in genotype 1-infected patients, compared to that in patients infected by other genotypes. The viral load decline at 24 hr was lower in patients with genotype 1. Patients with a high baseline viral load exhibited a viral dynamics different from patients with a lower level of viremia; the extent of the first phase was also lower in these patients. Non-responder patients had a slower viral decay on day 1 of therapy than patients who cleared the virus under treatment. In conclusion, 24 hr HCV dynamics is regulated by genotype and baseline viral load. Genotype 1 strains and those that produce high viral loads are the most resistant to the antiviral action of IFN-alpha. Resistant HCV strains could be distinguished from sensitive viruses as early as a few hours after the beginning of the treatment.

Treatment of Relapsers after Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

Sustained virologic response rates are significantly higher in patients who have relapsed after a previous course of therapy compared with patients who did not respond. A meta-analysis of combination therapy in patients who failed IFN monotherapy reported SVR rates of 52% in relapsers to prior therapy and 16% in nonresponders. Similarly, relapsers after combination standard IFN and RBV therapy have higher SVR rates than combination of therapy nonresponders when treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. For this reason, patients who relapse after a previous course of therapy should be considered potential candidates for retreatment. Factors that have been associated with SVR in these patients include genotype non-I, low viral loads, and lesser degrees of fibrosis. The course of treatment in all patients who have relapsed after prior therapy should be reviewed to identify possible reasons for failure to achieve an SVR. In particular, optimal dosing of PEG IFN and RBV and the occurrence and timing of treatment dose reductions during prior therapy should be reviewed. The reasons for dose reduction should be addressed before initiating another course of therapy in an effort to optimize the chance for a SVR. Patients who had dose reduction for depression, anemia, or neutropenia, should be considered for antidepressants, erythropoietin, or, if neutropenia is severe, granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy, respectively, during retreatment. Prolongation of therapy beyond 48 weeks in patients with relapse after a standard course of PEG IFN and RBV may offer a chance of SVR. Novel agents currently in development, including protease and polymerase inhibitors, may prove to be therapeutic options for these patients in the future.

Randomized trial of three different regimens for 24 weeks for re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to respond to interferon-alpha monotherapy in Taiwan

With the favorable result of interferon (IFN)-ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks among naive Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, the optimal regimens of re-treatment for CHC patients who failed initial IFN monotherapy is not well-established. The study evaluated the effectiveness of re-treatment for 24 weeks with 3 different regimens and predictors for sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

Total 120 Taiwanese CHC patients (81 males, 70 relapsers, mean age: 48.6 years) who failed initial IFN monotherapy were enrolled. They were assigned randomly (with a ratio of 1:1:2) to receive one of the three regimens for re-treatment for 24 weeks; group A: IFN 6 million units (MU) monotherapy (N=30), group B: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 3 MU (N=30) or group C: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 6 MU (N=60). The intention-to-treat rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38.3%. The SVR rate in group C (53.3%) was significantly higher than group A (16.7%, P<0.005) and group B (30%, P<0.05). Drop-out rates were similar between the three groups. Patients achieving SVR had significant improvement histologically. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype non-1b infection, lower pretreatment HCV RNA levels, combined with ribavirin and with higher IFN dose, and relapsers were independent predictors for SVR.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that more than one-third Taiwanese CHC patients achieved SVR after 24 weeks re-treatment and combination therapy, especially with higher dose of IFN, yielded higher efficacy.

Treatment of relapsers after combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

A significant number of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapse after treatment. As therapy for CHC has improved over the last decade, the issue of retreating patients who did not achieve a sustained virologic response with previous treatment regimens frequently arises. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy in IFN and RBV therapy relapsers. Patients who have relapsed after therapy have significantly higher SVR rates than those who are nonresponders to therapy and should be considered candidates for retreatment. Predictors of a favorable response to therapy in naïve patients appear to also predict response to therapy in patients who have relapsed previously.

Weight-based dosing of pegylated interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis C: just a marketing 'gag'?

Today medical-scientific data are diluted by the marketing strategies of the biomedical industry making it difficult for practising physicians to decide what is correct or wrong. One typical example is the use of pegylated interferons for treatment of chronic hepatititis C. In this report the arguments pro and contra weight-based dosing are critically discussed. The factors contributing to success or failure to eradicate the virus are manifold, and include the sensitivity of the virus to interferon, viral genotype, age, gender stage of fibrosis, presence or absense of steatosis. Weight by itself plays just a minor role. The impact of weight-based dosing in general is overestimated and certainly not needed when 40 kD branched PEG-IFNalpha2a with a restricted volume of distribution is used. Whether weight-based dosing of 12 kD linear PEG-IFNalpha2b provides any benefit over a flat dose of the drug remains to be studied.

Chronic hepatitis C patients with a post-treatment virological relapse re-treated with an induction dose of 18 MU interferon-alpha in combination with ribavirin and amantadine: a two-arm randomized pilot study

Thirty-seven chronic hepatitis C patients with virological relapse (VR) after previous interferon-alpha (IFN) or IFN/ribavirin (Riba) therapy, were re-treated. Patients were randomized for either IFN/Riba and amantadine (Ama) including a 2-week initial high IFN induction course (18 MU IFN daily) (group A) or the same 2-week IFN induction course combined with Riba/Ama, followed by Riba/Ama without IFN (group B). Treatment duration for both groups was 24 weeks with a 24-week follow-up thereafter. The inclusion in group B was prematurely stopped because all patients (n = 10) relapsed within 2 weeks after stopping IFN. Therefore, all subsequent patients were included in group A (n = 27). In group A, 44% achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) and 29% of the patients with an end-of-treatment virological response had a VR again. Of all pretreatment characteristics, only genotype non-1 patients had a significantly higher chance of achieving SVR (P < 0.001). Of the characteristics during treatment only a negative hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA test result in transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) at week 6 had a high predictive value for SVR, 80% in all patients and 92% in genotype non-1 patients. In conclusion, hepatitis C patients with a VR to previous antiviral treatment can be successfully re-treated with IFN induction combined with Riba/Ama for only 6 months, when they have genotype non-1 and a negative HCV-RNA test result in TMA 6 weeks after the start of therapy. Riba/Ama combination therapy without IFN does not prevent VR after 2 weeks high IFN induction.

Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone according to viraemia in interferon responder-relapser hepatitis C patients: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled study

Low pretreatment viral load has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of sustained response (SR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs IFN alone in low viraemic patients (<2 millions copies/mL) who had relapsed to a previous course of IFN and the efficacy of 24 vs 48 week combination therapy in high viraemic patients. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the four regimens after stratification on pretreatment viral load. All patients received IFN-alpha2b (6 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 3 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks). Patients with low viraemia received either IFN-alpha2b alone for 48 weeks (R1: 42 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks and IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R2: 48 patients). Patients with high viral load received either IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and then IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R3: 104 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (R4: 103 patients). In low viraemic patients the rate of SR was 37.7% in group R1 and 59.6% in group R2 (P < 0.05). In high viraemic patients, the rate of SR was 44.7% in group R3 and 51.4% in group R4 (P: NS). Thirty-one patients discontinued treatment (10.4%) without difference regarding treatment regimen. In the regimen using ribavirin we found no difference in terms of SR between patients receiving a dose of ribavirin below 10.6 mg/kg/day (55%) or over 10.6 mg/kg/day (58%). Histological improvement occurred in 70.2% of patients regardless of the regimen. Logistic regression showed that genotype 2 and 3, Knodell score <6 and alanine aminotransferase pretreatment level >3 x upper limit of normal were significantly and independently correlated with SR. In low viraemic patients who relapsed to a previous IFN treatment, combination therapy using high-dose IFN and low-dose ribavirin is better than high-dose IFN alone. In high viraemic patients there was no benefit in increasing the duration of combination therapy from 24 to 48 weeks. In this study, it was found that low dose of ribavirin can be used safely and there is no effect of ribavirin dose on SR.

Efficacy of interferon monotherapy to 394 consecutive naive cases infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 2a in Japan: therapy efficacy as consequence of tripartite interaction of viral, host and interferon treatment-related factors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The mechanism of variable response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy in patients infected with HCV genotype 2a is still unclear. Here we investigated the response in a large group of patients infected with genotype 2a.

METHODS

We evaluated 394 consecutive non-cirrhotic naive patients infected with genotype 2a who received IFN monotherapy for 24 weeks, including initial aggressive induction therapy. Of these, 97 were also evaluated for early viral kinetics in serum and treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

The overall sustained response (SR) rate was 68.3% (viral load <1.0 Meq/ml (82.4%); >/=1.0 (52.4%)). Multivariate analysis identified five independent factors associated with SR; viral load <1.0 Meq/ml, total IFN dose > or =700 million units, hepatocyte steatosis none or mild, albumin > or =3.9 g/dl, and alanine aminotransferase > or =75 IU/l. The kinetic study showed that serum viral clearance at < or =1 week was the best predictor of SR, and persistence at > or = 4 weeks was a predictor of non-SR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that viral, host and IFN treatment-related factors determine the response to IFN monotherapy in patients infected with HCV genotype 2a. Further, we report that IFN monotherapy is very effective for patients with genotype 2a, especially for those with low viral load; and that early viral kinetics is useful as a predictor of the response.

Role of liver biopsy in management of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review

This systematic review addresses 2 questions pertinent to the need for pretreatment liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: how well do liver biopsy results predict treatment outcomes for chronic hepatitis C? How well do biochemical blood tests and serologic measures of fibrosis predict the biopsy findings in chronic hepatitis C? Medline and other electronic databases were searched from January 1985 to March 2002. Additional articles were sought in references of pertinent articles and recent journals and by querying experts. Articles were eligible for review if they reported original human data from a study that used virological, histological, pathologic, or clinical outcome measures. Paired reviewers assessed the quality of each eligible study and abstracted data. Studies suggested that advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on initial liver biopsy is associated with a modestly decreased likelihood of a sustained virological response (SVR) to treatment. Also, studies relatively consistently showed that serum aminotransferases have modest value in predicting fibrosis on biopsy; that extracellular matrix tests hyaluronic acid and laminin may have value in predicting fibrosis, and that panels of tests may have the greatest value in predicting fibrosis or cirrhosis. Biochemical and serologic tests were best at predicting no or minimal fibrosis, or at predicting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, and were poor at predicting intermediate levels of fibrosis. Thus, evidence suggests that liver biopsy may have some usefulness in predicting efficacy of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, and biochemical blood tests and serologic tests currently have only modest value in predicting fibrosis on liver biopsy.

Role of liver biopsy in management of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review

This systematic review addresses 2 questions pertinent to the need for pretreatment liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: how well do liver biopsy results predict treatment outcomes for chronic hepatitis C? How well do biochemical blood tests and serologic measures of fibrosis predict the biopsy findings in chronic hepatitis C? Medline and other electronic databases were searched from January 1985 to March 2002. Additional articles were sought in references of pertinent articles and recent journals and by querying experts. Articles were eligible for review if they reported original human data from a study that used virological, histological, pathologic, or clinical outcome measures. Paired reviewers assessed the quality of each eligible study and abstracted data. Studies suggested that advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on initial liver biopsy is associated with a modestly decreased likelihood of a sustained virological response (SVR) to treatment. Also, studies relatively consistently showed that serum aminotransferases have modest value in predicting fibrosis on biopsy; that extracellular matrix tests hyaluronic acid and laminin may have value in predicting fibrosis, and that panels of tests may have the greatest value in predicting fibrosis or cirrhosis. Biochemical and serologic tests were best at predicting no or minimal fibrosis, or at predicting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, and were poor at predicting intermediate levels of fibrosis. Thus, evidence suggests that liver biopsy may have some usefulness in predicting efficacy of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, and biochemical blood tests and serologic tests currently have only modest value in predicting fibrosis on liver biopsy.

[Role of interferons in the treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections]

BACKGROUND

Since the discovery of hepatitis C (HCV), the efficacy of treatment has significantly progressed using standard mono-therapy: with Interferon alpha (IFN) during six months we obtained approximately 10% sustained response and currently with the association of pegylated IFN and Ribavirin a 55% sustained response was achieved.

CURRENT POSITION AND MAJOR POINTS

HCV infection continues to present therapeutic problems which have not entirely been solved, mainly related to clinical and biological tolerance, and non-responders. Moreover, the care of patients with extra-hepatic localization, cirrhotic patients, as well as therapeutic problems of co-infected HIV-HCV patients. As regards hepatitis B (HBV) new effective treatments against this virus have appeared, IFN then nucleoside analogs, some of which are available in France (i.e. lamivudine, adefovir, dipovoxil). The main objective of chronic hepatitis B treatment is to obtain the complete inhibition of the HBV virus by Hbe-antigen antibody seroconversion which would therefore significantly increase patient survival. In this article the advantages and disadvantages of the different treatments are assessed.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Despite the considerable and rapid progress obtained in the therapeutic treatment of infection due to HCV and HBV a number of unknown factors remain, which warrants further trials, in particular to evaluate the efficacy as well as the tolerance of the antiviral agent association.

Genetic heterogeneity of the envelope 2 gene and eradication of hepatitis C virus after a second course of interferon-alpha

The heterogeneity of the envelope 2 (E2) gene of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) was involved in the sensitivity of HCV to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). To assess the factors leading to virus eradication by IFN-alpha, patients whose first treatment by IFN-alpha failed and who had virus eradication after a second treatment were studied. These patients were paired with subjects in whom both treatments failed. The phosphorylation homology domain of the E2 gene (E2-PHD) had no sequence variation between the two stages in both groups of patients. Therefore, this region has no clinical predictive value within a specific genotype. The hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) was analyzed by cloning and sequencing 20 clones per sample. Comparison of samples showed that the change in quasispecies induced by the first IFN-alpha therapy could be associated with virus elimination obtained after a second treatment. The greater proportion of nonsynonymous mutations that was noted before the second treatment in responders suggest that pretherapeutic immune response is a major factor determining virus elimination and that the immune status of these patients changed between the first and the second treatment.

Interferon for interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis of interferon therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C has documented its efficacy in achieving virologic clearance, and improving liver biochemistry and histology; however, since its publication additional trials have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response to interferon in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. The effect of treatment dose and duration, and the response in patients with cirrhosis and those with normal aminotransferases was also investigated.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 1999), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 1999), and reference lists were searched, and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing interferon with placebo, no treatment, or different regimens of interferon were selected. Abstracts were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was sustained disappearance of serum HCV RNA (virologic sustained response (SR)). Biochemical and end of treatment responses, liver histology, and adverse events were also recorded. Assessment of drug efficacy used the methods of Peto and Der Simonian and Laird.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-four trials enrolling 6545 patients were included. Compared with no treatment, interferon 3 MU thrice weekly for 12 months increased the probability of a virologic SR (Peto odds ratio (OR) 4.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 to 13.85). At this dosage and duration of therapy, the rate of virologic SR was 17% (95% CI 10 to 28%) in interferon-treated patients versus 3% (95% CI 1 to 10%) in controls. A dose of 6 MU was more effective than 3 MU thrice weekly (OR for 12 months treatment, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 4.45), as were durations of 12 months or greater versus six months (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.67). Adverse events were more common with higher doses and prolonged durations of treatment. Compared with no therapy, interferon increased the probability of histologic improvement (OR 9.22; 95% CI 5.69 to 14.94). The response to interferon in cirrhotic patients (virologic SR, 17%; 95% CI 11 to 26%) was similar to that in non-cirrhotic patients. However, interferon was no more effective than control in patients with normal aminotransferases.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon is effective in achieving viral clearance and improving liver biochemistry and histology in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Higher doses and prolonged durations are more effective, but associated with more frequent adverse events. Interferon is associated with similar benefits in patients with cirrhosis, but the efficacy in patients with normal aminotransferases is unproven.

An analysis of published trials of interferon monotherapy in children with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Although no therapeutic regimen has received Food and Drug Administration approval for treating children with chronic hepatitis C viral infection (CHC), there have been a number of pediatric interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) trials. The purpose of this study was to perform a critical review of these trials to determine 1) end-of-treatment (ETR) and sustained-response (SR) rates, 2) predictors of response to therapy, and 3) safety of and tolerance to IFN-alpha in children with CHC.

METHODS

Relevant studies in the English-language medical literature and abstracts (January 1990 through November 2000) were identified by searching for manuscripts that contained the key words "children," "hepatitis C," and "interferon." Trials were considered eligible for inclusion in this analysis if criteria for treatment included positive serum polymerase chain reaction for hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV PCR).

RESULTS

Twenty published manuscripts of the use of IFN-alpha in children with CHC were found, of which 12 met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-two abstracts, of which seven met our inclusion criteria, were identified. In the 19 included trials, 366 treated and 105 untreated children were observed; five countries were represented. Average ETR was 54% (0%-91%) and average SR was 36% (0%-73%). The SR in children with genotype 1 was 27% versus 70% for nongenotype 1 ( P = 0.001). Five of 105 (5%) untreated controls exhibited spontaneous viral clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there is no published large-scale, multicenter, prospective, placebo-controlled randomized trial of the use of IFN-alpha in children with CHC. The data in this review suggest that IFN-alpha in children with CHC does have reasonable efficacy and safety. This review highlights the need for a more systematic design of future pediatric CHC trials. Ideally, such trials would be large scale, prospective, and controlled, and would include HCV genotype and viral load, histology, quality of life measures, and systematic recording of adverse events and of effects of therapy on growth and development.

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon monotherapy leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Studies have yielded conflicting results regarding retreatment with interferon in nonresponders and relapsers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of retreatment with interferon in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic databases, manual searches, authors, and pharmaceutical companies (August 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing interferon versus control or different interferon regimens in chronic hepatitis C patients being nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was failure to achieve a sustained virologic response defined as positive serum hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months following treatment. Secondary outcomes included liver-related morbidity, mortality, biochemical responses, adverse events, and histology.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten randomised trials involving 686 nonresponders and eight trials involving 484 relapsers were included; their methodological quality was poor. In nonresponders, interferon reduced the risk of not achieving an end of treatment biochemical response compared with no treatment (relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.91); however, virologic responses were not reported. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, doses greater than 3 million units (MU) three times weekly offered no advantage compared with 3 MU three times weekly for biochemical sustained response. Failure to obtain a virologic sustained response was less likely with 48 than 24 weeks of therapy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96). Adverse events did not differ significantly regardless of treatment dose or duration. In relapsers, none of the trials compared interferon with no treatment. In a post hoc analysis, doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly were no more effective in achieving a virologic sustained response than 3 MU three times weekly. Compared with 24 weeks, treatment durations of 48 weeks were less likely to fail to achieve a virologic sustained response (RR 0.69, 95% CI Random 0.51 to 0.95), but associated with more frequent dosage reduction (RR 9.07, 95% CI 1.20 to 68.63). No data regarding clinical outcomes or histology was available in either patient group.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with interferon leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of chronic hepatitis C patients with nonresponse or relapse following interferon monotherapy. Treatment durations of 48 weeks are superior to 24 weeks, but doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly are no more effective. No data exists regarding the effect on clinical outcomes.

Effect of HCV viral dynamics on treatment design: lessons learned from HIV

Viral load measurements provide an indication of viral replication, and thereby serve as a valuable tool to guide the initiation of therapy and subsequent changes. Plasma human immunodeficiency viral load strongly predicts the rate of decrease in CD4+ lymphocyte count, and progression to AIDS and death. Furthermore, the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy can be assessed by monitoring changes in plasma human immunodeficiency viral load. Similarly, viral load provides valuable information about the natural history of the hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatitis C viral load can be used to predict the likelihood of response to standard interferon-alpha treatment and other interferon-alpha regimens and to monitor treatment efficacy. Increased understanding of the natural history of the hepatitis C virus infection and the nature of resistance to interferon-alpha therapy suggests that effective treatment regimens must maintain serum levels of interferon-alpha. Ideally, interferon-alpha serum levels should provide constant pressure on the virus and should prevent viral rebound, thereby avoiding continued viral replication and minimizing the potential for emergence of resistant quasi-species. Current regimens designed to address these points include early aggressive intervention, combination drug regimens, prolonged maintenance, and novel interferons. By enabling the design and rapid assessment of new treatment regimens, viral load measurement will revolutionize the clinical management of the hepatitis C virus infection, as it has the HIV.

High-dose prolonged combination therapy in non-responders to interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Therapy of chronic hepatitis C non- responders to interferon monotherapy with standard doses of interferon plus ribavirin is usually ineffective.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose prolonged combination retreatment in non- responder patients.

METHODS

Patients were retreated for 6 months with 6 MU alphaIFN on alternate days and 1000 or 1200 mg/day ribavirin. HCV-RNA negative patients continued therapy for an additional 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty patients (29 males, mean age 49.7 years, 34 genotype 1b, 11 with F3 fibrosis) were treated. At 6 months, 20 (50%) patients were HCV-RNA negative but six of them discontinued therapy because of adverse events. A sustained response was achieved in 28% of patients (11/40). A sustained response was more frequent among patients with genotype non-1b than in those with genotype 1b (67 vs. 21%, P=0.005) and clearance of HCV-RNA in the first 3 months had a high predictive value for sustained response (100% of sustained responders vs. 24% of non-responders, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose prolonged combination therapy in non-responders to IFN monotherapy leads to a higher rate of sustained response than the standard combination regimen. Tolerability may be a rate-limiting factor. Maximal effectiveness can be predicted in patients with non-1b genotype and in those who clear HCV-RNA soon after starting retreatment.

Current treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B and C

For chronic hepatitis B, treatment with a 4-month course of interferon alfa-2b can achieve hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, normalization of aminotransferase levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced progression to cirrhosis and improvement in survival in 20%-30% of patients. Similar results can be achieved with a 12-month course of lamivudine, with response rates increasing to 40%-65% after 3 years of therapy. Interferon can also be used in early cirrhotic patients, and lamivudine can be used in advanced cirrhotics and immunosuppressed patients. Combination interferon and lamivudine therapy does not confer additional benefits. For chronic hepatitis C, the combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin is the treatment of choice, offering superior sustained response rates (40%) compared with interferon alone (15%). Therapy should be administered for 12 months to patients with genotype 1 virus but for only 6 months to patients with genotypes 2 and 3. Patients experiencing relapse after 6 months of interferon monotherapy can be re-treated with interferon and ribavirin or high-dose interferon, with 45%-56% sustained response rates. However, relatively few patients who are prior nonresponders to interferon monotherapy will have sustained response to further interferon-based treatments, including combination therapy with ribavirin. Successful therapy not only leads to the eradication of viral RNA but also may delay progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG), shows promise as an improved formulation of interferon with yet higher sustained response rates.

Combination of “low-dose” ribavirin and interferon alfa-2a therapy followed by interferon alfa-2a monotherapy in chronic HCV-infected non-responders and relapsers after interferon alfa-2a monotherapy

AIM: To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a “low dose” of ribavirin for relapsers and non-responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.

METHODS: Thirty four chronic hepatitis C virus infected non responders to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a course of at least 3 months treatment) and 13 relapsers to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a dose of 3 to 6 million units three times per week for at least 20 weeks but not more than 18 months) were treated with the same dose of interferon alfa-2a used before (3 to 6 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (10 mg/kg daily) for 6 months. In complete responders, interferon alfa-2a was administered for further 6 months at the same dose used before as monotherapy.

RESULTS: Seven (20.6%) of 34 non responders stopped the combined therapy due to adverse events, including two patients with histological and clinical Child A cirrhosis. In 17/27 (63%) non responders, the combined therapy was stopped after three months because of non response. Ten of the 27 non responders completed the 12 month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 28 months (16-37 months) after the treatment, 4/10 (15%) previous non responders still remained complete responders. All 13 previous relapsers completed the 12-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 22 months (9-36 months) after treatment, 6/13 (46%) the previous relapsers were still sustained complete responders.

CONCLUSION: Our treatment schedule of the combined therapy for 6 months of interferon alfa-2a with a low dose of ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) followed by 6 months of interferon alfa-2a monotherapy is able to induce a sustained complete response rate in 15% of non responders and 46% of relapsers with chronic hepatitis C virus related liver diseases comparable to those obtained with the standard doses of ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. Randomized prospective controlled trials using lower total amounts of ribavirin in combination with interferon should be performed.

Viral, host and interferon-related factors modulating the effect of interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus infection

The estimated prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the US is approximately 1.8%. Although interferon monotherapy and combination therapy of interferon with ribavirin represent mainstay for treating HCV infection, the rate of sustained virologic response remains suboptimal. The growing evidence suggested that the clinical sequence and treatment response of chronic hepatitis C are determined by a dynamic, complex tripartite relationship among HCV infection, the host immune response, and the effect of different interferon regimens. The treatment response is associated with various viral factors including the pretreatment viral level, dynamic change of viral level during treatment, viral genotype quasispecies and nucleotide mutation in nonstructural protein 5A of hepatitis C virus. Host factors that may affect treatment response include age, gender, race, HLA alleles and the host immune responses. Interferon regimens, including type, dose, frequency and duration of treatment and combination of interferon with other anti-HCV agents also alter the therapeutic response. Understanding these complicated interaction may provide better insights into the mechanism(s) of interferon response, leading to more effective clinical application of interferon therapy.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who failed interferon monotherapy: effects of higher doses of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. The Virginia Cooperative Hepatitis Treatment Group

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interferon-ribavirin combination therapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients who failed previous treatment with interferon monotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 140 patients with well-documented chronic HCV who failed to achieve a virological (if HCV-RNA was assessed) or biochemical response (if HCV-RNA was not assessed) to interferon monotherapy, 3 mU three times weekly (TIW) for 3-18 months, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Group A patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW for 6 months. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) was added in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group B patients were treated with 3 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. The dose of interferon was increased to 5 mU TIW in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group C patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. Serum ALT and HCV-RNA were monitored during and after treatment for a total of 15 months.

RESULTS

Seventeen percent of patients in group A became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Adding ribavirin resulted in one additional patient becoming HCV-RNA negative. However, none of the patients in this group achieved sustained virological response. Twenty-six percent of patients in group B became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Increasing the dose of interferon from 3 to 5 mU TIW increased virological response to 30%. However, sustained virological response was observed in only 14%. Thirty percent of patients in group C became HCV-RNA negative, but sustained virological response was observed in only 12%. Sustained virological response was found to be significantly greater in patients with a nontype I HCV genotype (p < 0.002) and in patients who had a decline in HCV-RNA titer to a value < 100,000 copies/ml during their previous course of interferon monotherapy (p < 0.0001). None of the 12 sustained responders were African Americans (p < 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment of nonresponders with interferon-ribavirin combination therapy results in limited benefit; only 13% of patients achieved sustained virological response. Response was extremely poor in African Americans and those with HCV genotype 1.

Combined treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C with high-dose alpha2b interferon plus ribavirin for 6 or 12 months

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Retreatment of relapses of chronic hepatitis C with a standard regimen of interferon plus ribavirin for 6 months obtains a sustained response in a minority of patients with high viraemia and genotype 1b. We aimed to assess whether increasing the interferon dose and prolonging the time of combined treatment may enhance the effectiveness, and also to evaluate the tolerability, and to identify the determinants of sustained response.

METHODS

Fifty subjects with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed after one or more courses of a-interferon monotherapy were randomised to receive alpha2b interferon (6 MU tiw) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 or 12 months. ALT normalisation and serum HCV-RNA clearance at the end of treatment and 6 months after stopping therapy were used as markers for sustained response.

RESULTS

End-of-treatment response was achieved in 48 patients (96%) and 27 (54%) had a complete sustained response. Patients treated for 12 months had a higher rate of sustained response (18/25, 72%; 95% C.I. 0.54-0.89) than those treated for 6 months (9/25, 36%; 95% C.I. 0.17-0.55, p=0.01). Twelve months of therapy was significantly more effective for patients with genotype 1b and baseline serum HCV-RNA greater than 450 000 copies/ml (p=0.005). Seven subjects (14%) discontinued treatment because of side effects. Logistic regression analysis showed 12 months of therapy, young age and low pre-treatment serum HCV-RNA to be independent predictors of sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapsers with genotype 1b and high levels of HCV-RNA will benefit from a 12-month course of 6 MU tiw interferon plus ribavirin, while subjects with genotype 1b and low levels of serum HCV-RNA or with genotype other than 1b may be treated for 6 months.

Hepatitis C

End-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation in the United States. Twenty percent to 30% of hepatitis C patients are at increased risk of developing cirrhosis, and 1% to 4% of cirrhotic patients will develop hepatocellular carcinoma. These findings warrant treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Currently, the mainstay in treatment of HCV is the use of recombinant alpha interferon, or its equivalent, in combination with the oral antiviral agent ribavirin. The major goals of therapy are clearance of the virus, achieving a noninfectious state, and halting the necro-inflammatory process that leads to fibrosis and progression to cirrhosis. End of treatment response (ETR) is biochemical and virological remission-- normalization of serum aminotransferase (ALT) and undetectable levels of HCV RNA, at the end of therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) is defined as the absence of viremia and persistently normal aminotransferase 6 months off treatment, and is the ultimate goal of therapy. Patients who achieve SVR will have significant and persistent histologic improvement. HCV genotype, pretreatment levels of HCV-RNA (viral load), the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, gender, and age are independent predictors of response. Ribavirin is teratogenic, therefore, contraception is mandatory for both males and females during and up to 6 months after therapy. Side effects of combination therapy are dose-dependent and most commonly include symptoms of irritability, depression and fatigue, and laboratory evidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hemolytic anemia.

Chronic liver disease in the extremely elderly of 80 years or more: clinical characteristics, prognosis and patient survival analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of patients with chronic liver disease aged 80 years or more, especially the factors affecting prognosis and carcinogenesis.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients aged 80 years or above were divided into chronic liver disease without cirrhosis (non-LC) and cirrhosis (LC) groups according to the severity of fibrosis, and the clinical characteristics and prognoses were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three (54.1%) of 135 patients were in the LC group and 79 patients (58.5%) had hepatitis C virus. Various concomitant diseases were seen in 122 patients (90.4%). Liver-related deaths occurred in only 19 (36.5%) of 52 patients who died during observation, although 28 patients (53.8%) had liver cancer at the time of death. Cumulative survival rates in the non-LC and the LC groups were 85.7% and 58.8% at the 5th year, and 69.4% and 19.4% at the 9th year, respectively. Cumulative liver cancer appearance rates in the non-LC and the LC groups were 1.6% and 6.1% at the 1st year, 12.4% and 19.9% at the 5th year, and 12.4% and 32.0% at the 7th year, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of liver cancer (p=0.0001), platelet count (p=0.0242), and fibrotic stage (p=0.0118) were independently associated with survival period, and alfa-fetoprotein (p=0.0194) and bilirubin (p=0.0282) were independently associated with carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhosis is the major risk factor affecting the prognosis. On the other hand, we must pay more attention to concomitant diseases specific to advanced age.

A short induction regimen of interferon-alpha is not effective for treatment of relapse in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized trial. For the multicentre GER-CYT-01 group

The aim of this work was to assess the effect of a high-dose (10 million units, MU) short-duration (14 weeks) interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) regimen in relapsers compared with the standard IFN regimen of 3 MU three times weekly (t.i.w.) for 6 months. Fifty-eight non-cirrhotic patients (who had relapsed after previous treatment with IFN) with chronic hepatitis were randomized: 29 to the high-dose, short-duration regimen and 29 to the standard regimen. By the end of IFN therapy, in the high-dose, short-duration group alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization was observed in 23 (79%) of 29 patients, and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in eight (28%) vs 25 (86%) and 11 (38%) of the 29 patients in the standard group, respectively (P = NS). At the end of the 72-week follow-up, in the high-dose, short-duration group a sustained ALT normalization was observed in two (7%) patients, and undetectable HCV RNA in 0 (0%) vs five (17%) and four (14%) patients in the standard group (P = NS). There was less fibrosis improvement in the high-dose, short-duration group (two of 26 patients, 8%) than in the standard group (eight of 25 patients, 32%) (P = 0.04). Tolerance to IFN was good and similar in the two groups. In conclusion, in IFN relapsers, high-dose, short-duration treatment with IFN-alpha has no advantage when compared to a 6-month treatment with 3 MU IFN t.i.w.

Chronic hepatitis C: interferon retreatment of relapsers. A meta-analysis of individual patient data. European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP)

Relapse after interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection occurs in 50% of patients after the initial response. The benefit of retreatment with IFN alone has not been assessed in large controlled studies. To assess the effectiveness and the tolerability of IFN retreatment and to identify the optimal second course regimen, we performed a meta-analysis of individual patient's data on a set of 549 patients (mean age 43.8 years; 12.2 SD, men: 65%) who had an end-of-treatment biochemical response to a first IFN course and then relapsed. Retreatment was started within 24 months after the end of the first course. Biochemical end-of-treatment responses (ETR) and sustained responses (SR) were observed in 405 of 549 (73.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.1-77.5) and in 124 of 549 (22.6%; CI 19.1-26.1) patients, respectively. One hundred seventy-five of 404 patients (43.3%; CI 38.6-48.2) developed an end-of-treatment, biochemical, and virological response when retreated. A biochemical and virological SR to retreatment occurred in 73 of 494 (14.8%; CI 11.7-18) patients. Thirty-two patients (5. 8%; CI 3.5-7.8) stopped retreatment for adverse effects. Biochemical and virological SR was predicted independently by logistic regression analysis using a negative HCV RNA at the end of the first cycle of IFN (P =.01) and by retreatment with a high IFN dose (P =. 03). Age, cirrhosis, genotype, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels before retreatment were not significant by multivariate analysis. The excellent tolerability of IFN monotherapy retreatment makes it an option for patients who transiently cleared HCV-RNA during their first IFN course. Patients should be retreated with a high IFN dose regardless of the strength of the dose received during the previous course of treatment.