Development of autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview

Autoimmune hepatitis is an immune-mediated inflammatory condition of the liver of undetermined cause that affects both sexes, all ages, races, and ethnicities. Its clinical presentation can be very broad, from having an asymptomatic and silent course to presenting as acute hepatitis, cirrhosis, and acute liver failure potentially requiring liver transplantation. The diagnosis is based on histological abnormalities (interface hepatitis), characteristic clinical and laboratory findings (increased aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and serum IgG concentration), and the presence of one or more characteristic autoantibodies. The large heterogeneity of these clinical, biochemical, and histological findings can sometimes make a timely and proper diagnosis a difficult task. Treatment seeks to achieve remission of the disease and prevent further progression of liver disease. First-line therapy includes high-dose corticosteroids, which are later tapered to decrease side effects, and azathioprine. In the presence of azathioprine intolerance or a poor response to the standard of care, second-line therapy needs to be considered, including mycophenolate mofetil. AIH remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, and a further understanding of the pathophysiological pathways of the disease and the implementation of randomized controlled trials are needed.

Rethinking de novo immune hepatitis, an old concept for liver allograft rejection: Relevance of glutathione S-transferase T1 mismatch

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver transplantation has long been underestimated. The concept of the liver as an organ susceptible to AMR has emerged in recent years, not only in the context of the major histocompatibility complex with the presence of HLA donor-specific antibodies, but also with antigens regarded as “minor”, whose role in AMR has been demonstrated. Among them, antibodies against glutathione S-transferase T1 have been found in 100% of patients with de novo autoimmune hepatitis (dnAIH) when studied. In its latest update, the Banff Working Group for liver allograft pathology proposed replacing the term dnAIH with plasma cell (PC)-rich rejection. Antibodies to glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) in null recipients of GSTT1 positive donors have been included as a contributory but nonessential feature of the diagnosis of PC-rich rejection. Also in this update, non-organ-specific anti-nuclear or smooth muscle autoantibodies are no longer included as diagnostic criteria. Although initially found in a proportion of patients with PC-rich rejection, the presence of autoantibodies is misleading since they are not disease-specific and appear in many different contexts as bystanders. The cellular types and proportions of the inflammatory infiltrates in diagnostic biopsies have been studied in detail very recently. PC-rich rejection biopsies present a characteristic cellular profile with a predominance of T lymphocytes and a high proportion of PCs, close to 30%, of which 16.48% are IgG4⁺. New data on the relevance of GSTT1-specific T lymphocytes to PC-rich rejection will be discussed in this review.

Autoimmune Hepatitis in the Liver Transplant Graft

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and de novo AIH are 2 important causes of late graft failure after liver transplantation (LT). Recurrent AIH occurs in patients who undergo LT for AIH. De novo AIH occurs in patients who are transplanted for etiologies other than AIH. Although typically treated with standard treatment for AIH, including corticosteroids and azathioprine, both recurrent and de novo AIH may progress to end-stage liver disease requiring retransplantation.

Familial occurrence of autoimmune liver disease with overlapping features of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis in a mother and her daughter

We encountered two patients with overlapping features of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis within the same family. A 68-year-old woman presented at our hospital from a previous medical institution because of the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis. Her 49-year-old daughter was admitted with liver dysfunction 4 years later. When compared, these two related patients were found to have overlapping features of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis. Their human leukocyte antigen haplotype was DRB1*04:05/DRB1*15:02. The clinical and biochemical findings of these two patients immediately improved following treatment with a combination of prednisolone and ursodeoxycholic acid, in accordance with the Japanese guidelines. It is extremely important to identify such pathological conditions as quickly as possible, particularly with the appearance of severe liver dysfunction due to liver cirrhosis, as observed in our case. The Japanese guidelines are considered to be a realistic and useful clinical policy for the swift and efficient treatment of patients with overlapping features of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis. We suggest that our two patients presented with a genetic predisposition to autoimmune liver disease with overlapping features of primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis within the same family.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis in liver transplant: State-of-the-art review

In the two past decades, a number of communications, case-control studies, and retrospective reports have appeared in the literature with concerns about the development of a complex set of clinical, laboratory and histological characteristics of a liver graft dysfunction that is compatible with autoimmune hepatitis. The de novo prefix was added to distinguish this entity from a pre-transplant primary autoimmune hepatitis, but the globally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis have been adopted in the diagnostic algorithm. Indeed, de novo autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by the typical liver necro-inflammation that is rich in plasma cells, the presence of interface hepatitis and the consequent laboratory findings of elevations in liver enzymes, increases in serum gamma globulin and the appearance of non-organ specific auto-antibodies. Still, the overall features of de novo autoimmune hepatitis appear not to be attributable to a univocal patho-physiological pathway because they can develop in the patients who have undergone liver transplantation due to different etiologies. Specifically, in subjects with hepatitis C virus recurrence, an interferon-containing antiviral treatment has been indicated as a potential inception of immune system derangement. Herein, we attempt to review the currently available knowledge about de novo liver autoimmunity and its clinical management.

Overlap syndromes: an emerging diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Overlap syndrome in hepatology is emerging as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, which is further complicated by the present gaps in the information regarding the immunopathogenesis of these diseases. The present review represents a concise review of literature on overlap syndromes with emphasis on prevalence, etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of true overlap syndromes.

Histologic findings predictive of a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation in adults

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after liver transplantation has been defined histologically as a "hepatitic" pattern of injury, characterized by lymphoplasmacytic inflammation with necroinflammatory activity (NIA), comparable with findings seen in native livers. This definition, however, is difficult to apply in practice because specific histologic criteria are not clearly delineated. This study aimed to determine which histologic features correlated best with clinical and serologic features of dAIH.

METHODS

Index liver biopsies from patients with autoimmune-like hepatitis transplanted for non-AIH in two centers (n=35 and 20) were reviewed. Histologic features were correlated with the clinical diagnosis of AIH based on a retrospective review of clinical and serologic data, including therapeutic response.

RESULTS

A clinical diagnosis of AIH was retrospectively assigned to 24 of 35 (68%) and 18 of 20 (90%) patients, respectively (P=0.10). In multivariate analysis, centrilobular NIA and centrilobular plasma cell (PC) ratio of 30% to 50% were independently discriminating for a clinical diagnosis of AIH (P=0.04 and 0.05, respectively). The best level of predictability (99.6%) was mathematically achieved when severe centrilobular NIA and centrilobular PC ratio of 30% to 50% were both present.

CONCLUSION

A histologic pattern of centrilobular injury including increased NIA and increased PC infiltration correlates with measurements of autoimmunity in liver recipients. It could be used to segregate cases for further study and introduced into the AIH scoring systems when applied in the context of liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation and autoimmune liver diseases

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Indications for LT for these diseases do not differ substantially from those used for other acute or chronic liver diseases. Despite the good outcomes reported, the recurrence of autoimmune liver disease is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, it has become apparent that autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disorders. An awareness of the existence of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after LT has important clinical implications because their management differs from the standard antirejection treatment and is similar to the management of classic autoimmune liver diseases in the native liver.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was the first chronic liver disease in which remission was achieved by immunosuppression. Prognosis is poor when left untreated. Since the original description in 1950 by Waldenström, the initially reported treatment option has remained until today and is the core of the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine. Immunosuppression as a treatment concept spans different situations including the induction and maintenance of remission, treatment of nonresponders, avoidance of side effects, perioperative treatment of liver transplantation candidates and the issue of withdrawal. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs such as transplantation immunosuppressants have been administered and reported in small series. In an attempt to optimize side effect management, a recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative for noncirrhotic AIH patients with lower steroid side effects. With an early diagnosis and effective therapy, only 4% of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH. After liver transplantation there is a considerable risk for graft loss because of recurrent AIH, and lifelong vigilance and therapeutic attention is important.

Development of autoantibodies after pediatric liver transplantation

Dn-AIH is a long-term complication after LT. The aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence of autoantibodies in pediatric recipients and the clinical significance. From 1992 to 2008, 96 pediatric LT for non-autoimmune liver diseases were performed in 94 children in our institution. Serum autoantibodies were checked in 68 subjects (73.9%). A positive autoantibody was defined as titers ≥1:40 for ANA, or ≥1:20 for ASMA, anti-LKM, and AMA. Autoantibodies were detectable in 51 of 68 patients (75.0%). There was positivity for ANA in 30 patients, ASMA in 32, and AMA in three, while anti-LKM was all negative. Immunosuppressive treatment with CsA, more than one episode of rejection, and abnormal ALT were risk factors for the development of autoantibodies. The incidence of the development of autoantibodies was 75.0% in pediatric LT cases in this study. ASMA was the most commonly found autoantibody. Autoantibodies may not play a sentinel role for dn-AIH after LT.

Autoimmune hepatitis as a unique form of an autoimmune liver disease: immunological aspects and clinical overview

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a unique form of immune-mediated disease that attacks the liver through a variety of immune mechanisms. The outcomes of AIH are either acute liver disease, which can be fatal, or, more commonly, chronic progressive liver disease, which can lead to decompensated liver cirrhosis if left untreated. AIH has characteristic immunological, and pathological, features that are important for the establishment of the diagnosis. More importantly, most patients with AIH have a favorable response to treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine, although some patients with refractory AIH or more aggressive disease require more potent immune-suppressant agents, such as cyclosporine or Mycophenolate Mofetil. In this paper, we discuss the immunological, pathological and clinical features of AIH, as well as the standard and alternative treatments for AIH.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation: clinical aspects

Autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are autoimmune liver diseases characterized by progressive immune-mediated inflammation leading to the destruction of the hepatocytes and the biliary epithelial cells, and eventually to cirrhosis and liver failure. The ultimate treatment of these diseases, upon the establishment of end-stage liver disease, includes liver transplantation (LT). Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after LT is an entity increasingly recognized in the last few decades. The mechanisms driving recurrence remain poorly understood. The accurate diagnosis of the recurrence and the proper management of the affected patients remains a clinical challenge. This review discusses clinical aspects related to the recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after LT. The main goals of this review are to discuss the reasons explaining the variability of the incidence rates of recurrent autoimmune disease and the outcome and risk factors for recurrent disease. We discuss in detail the diagnostic criteria and the treatment options of these disorders.

Incidence and risk factors associated with de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) describes the development of hepatitis with autoimmune features in liver transplant (LT) patients without prior diagnosis of AIH. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for de novo AIH.

METHODS

A cohort of 576 patients with LT for aetiologies other than AIH was evaluated.

RESULTS

De novo AIH was diagnosed in 17 patients (3%) with an overall incidence of 4.0 cases per 1000 patient-years. By univariate Cox analysis, patients who received cyclosporine A had lower risk (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.80, P = 0.02), whereas patients who had female donors (HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.11-8.25, P = 0.03), donors ≥40-years (HR 6.95, 95% CI 1.93-25.03, P = 0.003), and those who received tacrolimus (HR 4.39, 95% CI 1.47-13.13, P = 0.008) and mycophenolate mofetil (HR 6.37, 95% CI 1.62-25.13, P = 0.008) had higher risk. Survival was similar in patients with de novo AIH compared with the LT population (mean survival time, 17 ± 1.5 vs. 16 ± 0.5 years, Log-rank test; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of de novo AIH is low and does not impact on long-term survival. Recipients of female or older donor grafts, or recipients using tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil as part of their immunosuppressive regimen have a higher risk of de novo AIH, whereas LT recipients maintained on cyclosporine A have a lower risk.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

Autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage acute and chronic autoimmune hepatitis. However, despite the good outcomes reported, disease recurrence is relatively common in the allograft. In addition, autoimmunity and autoimmune liver disease can arise de novo after transplantation for non-autoimmune liver disorders. Little is known about the mechanisms by which autoimmune diseases develop after liver transplantation, but genetic factors, molecular mimicry, impaired regulatory T-cell responses, and exposures to new alloantigens might be involved. Regardless of the pathogenic mechanisms, it is important to remain aware of the existence of recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation; these disorders are similar to classic autoimmune hepatitis and are therefore not treated with standard antirejection strategies.

Therapy of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis was the first chronic liver disease with a favourable response to drug therapy and a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Since its original description in 1950 and first treatment studies the basic therapeutic strategy of inducing remission with steroids and azathioprine has not been modified in principle. A timely diagnosis before cirrhosis develops, the avoidance of immunosuppressant side effect, non-responders to standard induction therapy, and adherence to therapy are the greatest challenges. Alternative immunosuppressive drugs have been tested in small series and include transplant immunosuppressants. A recent large multicenter prospective treatment trial suggests that budesonide may offer an alternative in non-cirrhotic AIH patients capable of minimizing unwanted steroid effects. The ultimate treatment approach upon drug treatment failure is liver transplantation. Only four percent of transplant candidates are transplanted for AIH but the risk for graft loss because of recurrence has to be considered and recurrent AIH treated after transplantation.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis with centrilobular necrosis following liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a case report

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurred in patients who underwent liver transplantation for a different etiology. This 55-year-old woman was transplanted due to PBC. One year after liver transplantation, she complained of fatigue. Liver function tests showed markedly elevated serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and globulin levels. She also tested positive for anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA). Liver biopsy showed lymphocytic and plasmacytic infiltration in the portal and periportal areas, with numerous areas of bridging centrilobular necrosis, indicating AIH. She had a pretreatment AIH score of 16 points, and a posttreatment score of 18 points according to the scoring system of the International AIH Group (IAHG). The patient was treated effectively with prednisone, but then suffered two further episodes of AIH as a result of decreasing the prednisone dose. Histological features on liver biopsy were similar to those on initial presentation. Treatment with prednisone and azathioprine resulted in a dramatically improved outcome. Her liver function and globulin levels rapidly returned to normal and have remained so thereafter.

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an idiopathic chronic autoimmune liver disease that primarily affects women. It is believed that the aetiology for PBC is a combination between environmental triggers in genetically vulnerable persons. The diagnosis for PBC is made when two of the three criteria are fulfilled and they are: (1) biochemical evidence of cholestatic liver disease for at least 6 month's duration; (2) anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) positivity; and (3) histologic features of PBC on liver biopsy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only FDA-approved medical treatment for PBC and should be administered at a recommended dose of 13-15 mg/kg/day. Unfortunately despite adequate dosing of UDCA, approximately one-third of patients does not respond adequately and may require liver transplantation. Future studies are necessary to elucidate the role of environmental exposures and overall genetic impact not only in the development of PBC, but on disease progression and variable clinical response to therapy.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver with a dismal prognosis when left untreated. Key for the improvement of prognosis is a timely diagnosis before cirrhosis has developed. This is reached by the exclusion of other causes of hepatitis, elevated immunoglobulin G, autoantibody profile and histological assessment. Treatment achieves remission rates in 80% of individuals and consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids and azathioprine. A recent randomised controlled multicenter trial has added budesonide to the effective treatment options in non-cirrhotic patients and leads to a reduction of unwanted steroid side effects. Autoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology. Association studies of major histocompatibility complex and other genes demonstrate an influence of immunogenetics. However, apart from the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, in which 10% of patients suffer from an autoantibody-positive autoimmune hepatitis linked to mutations of the autoimmune regulator gene, there is no clear evidence for a hereditary aetiology of this disease.

Plasma cell hepatitis in hepatitis C virus patients post-liver transplantation: case-control study showing poor outcome and predictive features in the liver explant

Plasma cell hepatitis (PCH) is characterized by plasma cell infiltration seen in allografts of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for conditions other than autoimmune hepatitis. We identified 40 PCH patients who underwent LT for hepatitis C virus (HCV) by searching our pathology database (1994-2006) for the keywords liver allograft, lymphoplasmacytic, and plasma cell(s). We selected 2 control patients who received LT for HCV for each PCH case. The control patients were matched according to date of LT and availability of biopsy material at the time interval to development of PCH in PCH patients. Explant and post-LT biopsy slides were blindly reviewed by 2 liver pathologists and the severity of the plasma cell infiltrate was scored. A score of 3 (plasma cells composing >30% of the infiltrate) defined PCH in allograft biopsies. Five random areas of dense inflammation were also examined in explant livers and the highest score was used. Poor outcome was defined as death or advanced fibrosis (stage >or= 4 of 6). We found that PCH patients were more likely to have worse outcomes than control patients (65% versus 40%, P < 0.01), including increased mortality (50% versus 30%, P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly worse survival for PCH patients from 4 to 10 years post-LT (P < 0.05). Explants from 40% of PCH patients had a score of 3 compared to 18% of control patients (P < 0.01). We found that the development of PCH is associated with poor outcome in patients undergoing LT for HCV. The association of significant plasma cell infiltrates in native livers of HCV patients developing PCH suggests that some patients may have a predisposition to developing PCH.

Recurrence of autoimmune disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

1. Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis. a Five percent of liver transplants are performed because of end-stage liver disease secondary to primary sclerosing cholangitis. b Recurrent disease affects 10% to 27% of recipients. c Diagnostic criteria of recurrence include the following: A confirmed diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis before liver transplantation. A cholangiogram showing nonanastomotic biliary strictures with beading and irregularity occurring 90 days after transplantation. Liver biopsy revealing fibrous cholangitis and/or fibro-obliterative lesions of large bile ducts. d The data argue for an association between recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis and rejection and steroid therapy. 2. Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis. a Overall recurrence rates can reach 50%. b The gold standard for diagnosis is histological, with bile duct destruction by granulomas indicated by a florid lesion. c Anti-mitochondrial antibody is not a reliable marker of recurrence. d Recurrence does not affect long-term patient or graft survival. 3. Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis. a Recurrence affects approximately 25% of liver allografts during the first 5 years after liver transplantation and more than 50% after 10 years of follow-up. b Diagnostic criteria of recurrence must include a combination of biochemical changes, (elevated serum aminotransferases levels and hypergammaglobulinemia), histological features of autoimmune hepatitis, and steroid dependency. c Immunosuppressive therapy should be pursued even if liver test results are normal.

Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis and development of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplant: A blind histologic study

AIM

This long-term study aimed to evaluate recurrence and evolution of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

We reviewed "blindly" allograft biopsy specimens of women who underwent transplantation for PBC (n = 84), and women who received a transplant for chronic hepatitis C virus infection (CHCV ) (n = 108). All needle liver biopsy specimens obtained more than 6 months post-OLT were examined, including 83 specimens from 44 PBC patients and 152 specimens from 58 CHCV patients.

RESULTS

Granulomatous destructive cholangitis was found in five biopsies from four PBC patients (P = 0.0048). Non-necrotizing epithelioid cell granulomas were present in four biopsies from four PBC patients, and in two biopsies from one CHCV patient. Piecemeal necrosis (P = 0.0002), lobular necroinflammatory activity (P < 0.0001), steatosis (P < 0.0001) and fibrosis (P < 0.0001) were more prevalent in CHCV patients than PBC patients. Four PBC patients developed histologic evidence of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), at a mean time of 3.66 years post-OLT. One of these patients had histologic features of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome. All four patients developed bridging fibrosis (n = 2) or cirrhosis (n = 2). No other PBC patient had evidence of cirrhosis after OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic findings indicative of recurrent PBC were present in 15.9% of the PBC patients undergoing biopsy in this series. However, this group of patients did not suffer significant bile duct loss or fibrosis, as compared to the control group, suggesting that recurrent PBC is a mild or slowly progressive disease. Histologic evidence of AIH was observed in allograft biopsies of some PBC patients.

Current and future treatments of autoimmune hepatitis

Corticosteroid therapy induces clinical, laboratory and histological improvements in 80% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Prednisone, alone or at a lower dose in combination with azathioprine, increases the 20-year life expectancy to 80% and prevents or reduces hepatic fibrosis in 79% of patients. The combination regimen is preferred and treatment should be considered in all patients with active disease. The duration of therapy is finite and the medication should be discontinued after resolution of all manifestations of inflammatory activity, including the histological changes. Relapse after drug withdrawal occurs in 50-79% of patients, and it should be treated with long-term azathioprine (2 mg/kg daily). Salvage therapies for individuals intolerant of or refractory to the conventional regimens include high-dose corticosteroids, with or without high-dose azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus or ciclosporin. Liver transplantation should be considered in patients with hepatic failure unresponsive to corticosteroid treatment, decompensated cirrhosis with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of at least 15 points, or hepatocellular carcinoma that meets transplantation criteria. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs after transplantation in at least 17% of patients, and it typically improves after adjustments in the immunosuppressive regimen. Future therapies are likely to include mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, adoptive transfer of T regulatory cells, and cytokine manipulation. The emergence of new treatments will require the development of a collaborative network of clinical and basic investigators, as the complexity and specificity of current management problems require solutions that exceed the capabilities of single institutions.

Risk factors for developing de novo autoimmune hepatitis associated with anti-glutathione S-transferase T1 antibodies after liver transplantation

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (de novo AIH) is a rare form of graft dysfunction that develops after liver transplantation (LT) in patients transplanted for conditions other than autoimmune disorders. Although characterized by biochemical, serological, and histological features of AIH, de novo AIH is sometimes associated with atypical serum autoantibodies, many of which are directed against glutathione S-transferase T1 (anti-GSTT1). GSTT1 donor/recipient genotype mismatch has been suggested as a necessary condition for the appearance of autoantibodies and de novo AIH. However, clinically evident disease is not observed in all patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies. We examined the incidence of de novo AIH and its conditioning (risk) factors in patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies. Anti-GSTT1 autoantibodies were detected in 29 of 419 [6.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-9.8] consecutive adult LT recipients with donor/recipient GSTT1 mismatch. Twenty of 27 assessable patients (74%) developed de novo AIH after a median follow-up of 26 months (95% CI, 19.2-32.8). The probability of de novo AIH was 11%, 44%, and 60% 12, 24, and 36 months after LT, respectively. No relationship emerged between de novo AIH and recipient gender, donor and recipient age, rejection episodes, immunosuppressive regime, allelic GSTT1 expression, human leukocyte antigen distribution, or cytomegalovirus infection. Multivariate analysis identified male donor [hazard ratio (HR), 3.3; 95% CI, 1.18-9.26; P = 0.018], nonalcoholic etiology (HR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.64-13.3; P = 0.002), and high anti-GSTT1 titer (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.04-8.57; P = 0.035) as independent predictors of de novo AIH. Most patients with anti-GSTT1 antibodies and donor/recipient GSTT1 mismatch developed clinically evident de novo AIH after LT. The risk of developing the disease was increased by male donor gender, nonalcoholic etiology of original liver disease, and a high anti-GSTT1 titer.

Seeking beyond rejection: an update on the differential diagnosis and a practical approach to liver allograft biopsy interpretation

Pathologic evaluation of liver allograft biopsies plays an integral role in the management of patients after liver transplantation. This review summarizes the clinical context and classical histology of different types of allograft rejection and also the common entities that enter the differential diagnosis of allograft rejection, and provides practical approaches to liver allograft biopsy interpretation. In addition, some of the new developments in the field of liver transplant pathology are updated. The purpose of this review is to provide guidance for pathologists interpreting liver allograft biopsies, particularly those interested in developing expertise in the field of liver transplant pathology.

Autoimmune liver diseases and recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation: what have we learned so far?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may all recur after liver transplant. Diagnosis of rPBC is defined by histology; rAIH by serology, biochemistry and histology; rPSC by histology and/or imaging of the biliary tree and exclusion of other causes of nonanastomotic biliary strictures. Criteria for recurrent disease (RD) may differ from those used in similar disease in the native liver: frequent use of immunosuppressive therapy changes the pattern and natural history of RD and can co-exist with other transplant-related causes of graft damage. RD may occur in the presence of normal liver tests; the reported incidence will depend on the way in which diagnostic tests (especially protocol biopsies) are applied. The risk of RD increases with time, but does not correlate with the rate of graft loss. Treatment is largely unproven: ursodeoxycholic acid will improve serology and may slow progression of rPSC and rPBC; introduction or increased dose of corticosteroids may reduce progression of rAIH. Risk factors for rPBC include use of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine; for rPSC include absence of colon peri-transplantation and for rAIH possible associations with some HLA haplotypes have been suggested.

Posttransplant plasma cell hepatitis (de novo autoimmune hepatitis) is a variant of rejection and may lead to a negative outcome in patients with hepatitis C virus

De novo autoimmune hepatitis has been described in both pediatric and adult liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Studies of small numbers of patients have proposed it to be an alloimmune hepatitis or form of chronic rejection. We have recently noted an increasing number of patients with post-LT recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) developing this, with an apparent negative impact on outcome and survival. We term this entity posttransplant plasma cell hepatitis (PCH). A search of our institution's pathology database was performed with the terms "plasma cell(s)," "lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate," and "liver allograft." A histological scoring system was devised to more reliably diagnose PCH in the setting of recurrent HCV. Thirty-eight patients were identified, and their clinical data were analyzed. Sixty percent had a negative outcome as defined by the development of cirrhosis, need for retransplantation, or death. Eighty-two percent had recent lowering of immunosuppression or subtherapeutic calcineurin inhibitor levels; 58% developed PCH within 2 years post-LT. Histologic resolution of PCH was associated with good outcome (P < 0.001). Patients not receiving treatment had a negative outcome (P = 0.007) as did patients receiving corticosteroids as therapy (P = 0.02). Persistence (P = 0.007) or recurrence of PCH was associated with negative outcome. In conclusion, PCH is a histologic variant of rejection. On liver biopsy, PCH can at times be difficult to diagnose, and the use of a standardized scoring system is recommended to differentiate it from other forms of allograft dysfunction. Treatment by optimization of immunosuppression without the use of corticosteroids appears effective. The development of PCH in the setting of recurrent HCV is a negative prognostic factor for patient outcome and allograft failure.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis following living-donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

Since first being described in 1998, de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after liver transplantation has been reported in several cases suffering from non-autoimmune liver diseases and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) T1 genotype mismatches between donor and recipient have also been suggested to constitute a risk factor for de novo AIH. Here, we report a 33-yr-old woman who presented complaining of marked fatigue and jaundice four yr after living-donor liver transplantation for PBC. On examination, transaminase levels were highly elevated and ANA and antimitochondrial antibody M2 were positive. Histological findings showed zonal necrosis with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration closely resembling AIH. She had pretreatment AIH score of 16 and 19 points after relapse of de novo AIH. Two color fluorescence in situ hybridization with X and Y chromosome-specific probes clearly revealed that the hepatocytes were of donor origin and lymphocytes were of patient origin. The GSTT1 genotype of the patient and the donor were the same null type, suggesting that mechanisms other than GSTT1 mismatches may exist in de novo AIH development. In conclusion, recipient immune cells attacked the allogeneic transplanted liver of the patient via de novo AIH, although the exact participation of autoimmune mechanisms is unclear.

Cirrhosis after orthotopic liver transplantation in the absence of primary disease recurrence

Liver allograft cirrhosis is a relatively uncommon complication of liver transplantation. Most cases can be attributed to disease recurrence, particularly recurrent hepatitis C. Little is known about the frequency, etiology, and natural history of liver allograft cirrhosis occurring without evidence of recurrent disease. The aim of the present study was to review the clinicopathological features in this group of patients. We retrospectively reviewed data from all adult patients who were transplanted between 1982 and 2002 and survived >12 months after orthotopic liver transplantation (n = 1,287). Cases of histologically proven cirrhosis were identified from histopathological data entered into the Liver Unit Database. A total of 48 patients (3.7%) developed cirrhosis. In 29 of them, cirrhosis could be attributed to recurrent disease (hepatitis C, 11; hepatitis B, 4; autoimmune hepatitis, 4; primary biliary cirrhosis, 2; primary sclerosing cholangitis, 3; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, 4; alcoholic liver disease, 1). In 9 of the 19 patients without evidence of disease recurrence, another cause of cirrhosis could be identified (de novo autoimmune hepatitis, 4; biliary complications, 4; acquired hepatitis B, 1). In the remaining 10 cases, the cause of cirrhosis remained unknown; their previous biopsies had shown features of chronic hepatitis of uncertain etiology. Three patients in this group died, and the remaining 7 are alive with good graft function 3-12 years after cirrhosis was first diagnosed. The prevalence of "cryptogenic" posttransplant cirrhosis was significantly higher in patients initially transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis (6%) than in those transplanted for other diseases (0.3%). In conclusion, posttransplant cirrhosis without disease recurrence is uncommon, but it is more frequent in patients transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis. Chronic hepatitis is the most frequent underlying pathological process in cases where the cause of cirrhosis remains uncertain.

Natural history of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation

Unexplained chronic hepatitis (CH) in the adult liver allograft recipient is not uncommon, but its natural history and clinical significance is unknown. A retrospective study was undertaken of adult liver allograft recipients to determine the frequency and natural history of unexplained CH. We evaluated only those patients who had undergone >or=2 liver biopsies after 6 months and were grafted for indications where recurrent disease could be confidently excluded (alcoholic liver disease [ALD] in those who remained abstinent and fulminant hepatic failure [FHF] from drug reactions). Of 288 patients who were transplanted for ALD or FHF, 30 fulfilled the above criteria. CH was first diagnosed at a median of 15.25 months after transplantation. A total of 24 patients showed mild necroinflammatory changes, and 12 had mild or moderate fibrosis. Liver tests did not reflect the presence or degree of inflammation or fibrosis. After a median of 4 years, necroinflammatory scores were increased in 5; new or progressive fibrosis was noted in 13%; 3 had developed cirrhosis; and 5 developed clinical evidence of portal hypertension. Progressive fibrosis was associated with a high titer of anti-nuclear antibodies (>1:1600) and a portal tract plasma cell infiltrate. There was a trend for correlation between necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis stage, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Serum alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.012) and female gender of the donor (P = 0.033) were associated with progressive fibrosis. Unexplained CH is not uncommon in the liver allograft and may progress to established cirrhosis in a subgroup of patients transplanted for ALD or FHF. Standard liver tests do not reflect the extent of these changes, so protocol liver biopsies may be required to detect these changes. We recommend careful history and follow-up in these patients.

Rejection and steroid dependence: unique risk factors in the development of pediatric posttransplant de novo autoimmune hepatitis

Posttransplant de novo autoimmune hepatitis (d-AIH) is increasingly described as a long-term complication after pediatric liver transplantation (LT). d-AIH is characterized by graft dysfunction, the development of autoimmune antibodies and histologic evidence of hepatitis in liver transplant recipients without previous history of autoimmune liver disease. This study is a matched case-control, univariate analysis aimed at identifying risk factors for the development of d-AIH and evaluating response to treatment. From 1984 to 2003, 619 children received 788 LTs at a single center. Forty-one patients developed d-AIH and were matched with controls for year of LT, age at time of LT and diagnosis. The following variables were insignificant in the development of d-AIH: age, gender, race, initial diagnosis, ischemia time, graft type, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus status, HLA typing and primary immunosuppression. Compared to controls, d-AIH patients were less likely to be on monotherapy immunosuppression or weaned off prednisone at the time of diagnosis. The d-AIH group relative to the controls had statistically significant greater numbers of rejection episodes. d-AIH was treated with prednisone and/or MMF in 39 of 41 patients and lead to significant improvements in liver function tests. Thirty-nine patients are alive at a mean of 4.0 years follow-up after diagnosis. Three have required retransplantation.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis following liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disorder first described in 1998. It appears in patients with liver transplants for non-AIH etiology. The few cases in the literature make it a little known entity due to mechanisms that are unclear. We present the case of a woman with a liver transplant whose graft developed de novo AIH. Diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis, the patient underwent liver transplantation for refractory pruritus. Sixteen months after transplantation, we detected alterations in the hepatic profile with hypertransaminasemia and elevated alkaline phosphatase, together with elevated antinuclear antibodies. IgG levels were normal. Histological findings indicated AIH. The patient responded rapidly to treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine. De novo AIH in patients transplanted for PBC may cause graft dysfunction. This report also analyzes the case with respect to the other four reported cases, discussing etiologic hypotheses.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Progressive histological damage in liver allografts following pediatric liver transplantation

The long-term histological outcome after pediatric liver transplantation (OLT) is not yet fully understood. De novo autoimmune hepatitis, consisting of histological chronic hepatitis associated with autoantibody formation and allograft dysfunction, is increasingly recognized as an important complication of liver transplantation, particularly in the pediatric population. In this study, 158 asymptomatic children with 5-year graft survival underwent protocol liver biopsies (113, 135, and 64 at 1, 5, and 10 years after OLT, respectively). Histological changes we re correlated with dinical,biochemical, and serological findings. All patients received cydosporine A as primary immunosuppression with withdrawal of corticosteroids at 3 months post OLT. Normal or near-normal histology was reported in 77 of 113 (68%), 61 of 135 (45%), and 20 of 64 (31%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The commonest histological abnormality was chronic hepatitis (CH), the incidence of which increased with time [25/113 (22%), 58/135 (43%), and 41/64 (64%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The incidence of fibrosis associatedwith CH increasedwith time [13/25 (52%), 47/58 (81%), and 37/41 (91%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The severity of fibrosis associated with CH also increased with time, such that by 10 years 15% had progressed to cirrhosis. Aspartate aminotransfemse (AST) levels were slightly elevated in children with CH (median levels 52 IU/L, 63 IU/L, and 48 IU/L at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with normal histology. On multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of chronic hepatitis was autoantibody positivity (present in 13% and 10% of children with normal biopsies at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and 72% and 80% of those with CH at 5 and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001). Four children with CH and autoantibodies, who also had raised immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and AST greater than 1.5 x normal fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Another two were found to be hepatitis C positive. No definite cause for CH could be identified in the other cases. In condusion, chronic hepatitis is a common finding in children after liver transplantation and is associated with a high risk of developing progressive fibrosis, leading to cirrhosis. Standard liver biochemical tests cannot be relied on either in the diagnosis or in the monitoring of progress of chronic allograft hepatitis. In contrast, the presence ofautoantibodies is strongly associated with the presence of CH. The cause of chronic hepatitis in transplanted allografts is uncertain but may be immune mediated, representing a hepatitic form of chronic rejection.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Glutathione S-transferase T1 mismatch constitutes a risk factor for de novo immune hepatitis after liver transplantation

A new form of autoimmune hepatitis referred to as de novo, has been reported after liver transplantation during the past 5 years. The features are identical to those of classical autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but the facts involved in the onset and outcome of this type of graft dysfunction are still unclear. The identification of antibodies directed to glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) in the sera of patients with de novo immune hepatitis led us to the description of an alloimmune reaction due to a GSTT1 genetic incompatibility between donor and recipient. We analyzed a cohort of 110 liver transplant patients treated in the liver transplant unit of our hospital during a period of 1 year, from September 2002 to October 2003. We found the following distribution of the GSTT1 genotypes (recipient/donor): +/+ = 66, +/- = 23, -/+ = 15, -/- = 6. Six of these patients were diagnosed with de novo immune hepatitis; all of them belong to the group of negative recipients with positive donors, and all produced anti-GSTT1 antibodies. This genetic combination is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of de novo immune hepatitis (IH) in liver transplant patients (P < .0001 by the Fisher exact test). In conclusion, our results clearly establish the importance of the GSTT1 genotype from donor and recipient of a liver transplant as a predictive marker for de novo IH. At the same time, we confirmed our initial results that only this particular donor/recipient combination triggers the anti-GSTT1 antibody production.

Outcome and Risk Factors of De Novo Autoimmune Hepatitis in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft dysfunction mimicking autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develops only rarely after liver transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disease. The long-term prognosis and risk factors of de novo AIH after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are unknown.

METHODS

We review our LDLT series to investigate the incidence and outcome of this form of graft dysfunction, focusing on follow-up histology.

RESULTS

Of 633 patients who underwent LDLT at Kyoto University from 1990 to 2002, 13 (2.1%) developed graft dysfunction with interface hepatitis resembling AIH (2 males, 11 females). The median age at LDLT of these 13 patients was 10 years (8 months to 26 years). All received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The dysfunction presented at a median interval of 3.1 (0.7-9.5) years after LDLT. Nine had definite AIH, and four had probable AIH at the onset of hepatitis. Patients were followed after a median of 3.5 (0.1-8) years from the onset of de novo AIH. Of 11 patients who underwent follow-up histologic evaluation, 3 underwent retransplantation, and 8 continued to have similar findings on subsequent biopsies, with fluctuations in the amount of necroinflammatory activity and an increase in fibrosis despite treatment. In a multivariate analysis, acute rejection episodes and recipient age between 11 and 15 years at LDLT independently had predictive value for the development of de novo AIH. Human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches and sex mismatch did not influence the occurrence of de novo AIH.

CONCLUSION

This series highlights the more severe histologic outcome of de novo AIH with longer follow-up despite immunosuppressive treatment. De novo AIH may arise from alloimmunologic injury, marked by clinically obvious episodes of acute rejection.

Autoimmune overlapping syndromes

The overlap syndrome raises several questions. First could these patients have two coincident autoimmune diseases? Such possibility cannot be discarded in particular in the setting of consecutive occurrence of the two conditions (eg, PBC followed by AIH) and this is consistent with the fact that autoimmune diseases are associated with one another in about 5% to 10% of cases. Furthermore, it is presumed that they share similar genetic susceptibility. A second possibility could be that overlap syndrome represents the middle of a continuous spectrum of two autoimmune liver diseases. The systematic study of the relationships between elementary histologic lesions and biochemistries in "pure" PBC patients pleads strongly for such a hypothesis. Pure PBC is characterized by 2 different groups of elementary lesions that are not interrelated: first, florid bile duct lesions and bile duct paucity and second, lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis and lobular necro-inflammatory changes. Furthermore, the first set of lesions is selectively associated with biochemical cholestasis and IgM levels, whereas the second set of lesions is selectively associated with serum transaminase activities and IgG levels. These observations are consistent with the assumption that two main mechanisms are involved in the progression of liver injury in PBC. The first is bile duct destruction leading to chronic cholestasis and fibrosis of biliary pattern. The second is lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis of hepatocytes, which tends to lead to cirrhosis, the pattern of which resembles cirrhosis following various forms of chronic active hepatitis. The author has therefore speculated that the picture of pure PBC results always forms the clinical and biochemical expression of the two main histologic lesions, and combination of these processes might explain why the spectrum of PBC varies from typical PBC to AIH or PBC overlap. A third hypothesis is that an exaggerated hepatitic response in PBC is associated with the HLA haplotype commonly seen in AIH, eg, B8, DR3, DR4. Further studies are obviously needed to confirm such an attractive hypothesis. Other possible explanation for the concurrent occurrence of features of both conditions in the same individual includes the selective modulation of HLA class 1, class 2 expression and Rantes by cholestasis itself and in particular bile acids. It is conceivable that the degree of interface and lobular inflammation in PBC and PSC may be modulated by chemokines, their receptors, and the parenchymal concentrations of individual bile acids that are all, at least in part, genetically determined.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis

Liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment for end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). It appears now well accepted that the disease recurs in the allograft. The diagnosis of recurrent PBC is made on the basis of a consistent history and demonstrating the histologic features of PBC on liver biopsy and exclusion of other causes of bile duct damage.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a long-term pathologic study

Although recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) has been reported, the full spectrum of changes and progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis is not yet established. We performed a detailed retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of 43 patients who underwent LT for PBC. Eight patients (18.6%) had definite recurrent PBC with florid duct lesions, 5 patients (11.6%) had recurrence with features of autoimmune liver disease, not otherwise specified (AILD-NOS), 7 patients (16.3%) had plasmacytosis only, 4 patients (9.3%) had chronic rejection, 18 patients (41.9%) have no recurrence at present, and 1 patient (2.3%) had acquired hepatitis C. Although definite diagnoses of PBC and AILD-NOS recurrences (n = 13) were made 1 month to 14 years (median, 4 years) post-LT, all patients had plasmacytosis in their earlier biopsy specimens. Also, these patients showed similar pre-LT and post-LT clinical features, with progressive fibrosis in 4 of 8 and 2 of 5 patients, respectively. Four of 13 patients with definite recurrence and 14 of 18 patients with no recurrence were administered azathioprine (AZA) as part of their post-LT therapy (P =.01). Six of 13 and 16 of 18 patients currently are alive, with median follow-ups of 11 and 5 years, respectively. No significant differences were seen with donor-recipient group A, group B, group O blood type, sex, or HLA mismatches; native liver histological characteristics; or tacrolimus-based therapy. In conclusion, recurrent autoimmune liver disease was seen in 30% of patients after LT for PBC and had features of PBC and/or AILD-NOS. Progression seen in 46% of patients was associated with late graft failure. Patients with no recurrent disease had shorter follow-up periods and more frequent immunosuppression, including AZA; some may still develop recurrence with longer follow-up.