Retreatment of chronic hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with recombinant interferon alfa-2a. The European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP)

Heterogeneity of immune control in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Clinical implications on immunity with interferon-α treatment and retreatment

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health issue. Interferon-α (IFN-α) treatment has been used to treat hepatitis B for over 20 years, but fewer than 5% of Asians receiving IFN-α treatment achieve functional cure. Thus, IFN-α retreatment has been introduced to enhance antiviral function. In recent years, immune-related studies have found that the complex interactions between immune cells and cytokines could modulate immune response networks, in-cluding both innate and adaptive immunity, triggering immune responses that control HBV replication. However, heterogeneity of the immune system to control HBV infection, particularly HBV-specific CD8⁺ T cell heterogeneity, has consequ-ential effects on T cell-based immunotherapy for treating HBV infection. Altogether, the host’s genetic variants, negative-feedback regulators and HBV components affecting the immune system's ability to control HBV. In this study, we reviewed the literature on potential immune mechanisms affecting the immune control of HBV and the clinical effects of IFN-α treatment and retreatment.

Efficacy of interferon for chronic hepatitis B in patients with nucleoside and nucleotide combination therapy failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In China, inappropriate therapies with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have induced hepatitis B virus resistance, combination therapy with nucleoside and nucleotide (ComTNsNt) failure, or multi-drug resistant mutations. However, the efficacy of combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir for ComTNsNt failure is limited. In the current study, the regimens of interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy, switching from NAs to IFN-α, and subsequent re-treatment with IFN-α were applied to treat ComTNsNt failure. We further evaluated the efficacy of this therapy.

METHODS

Eleven patients with ComTNsNt failure were enrolled in this study. Nine subjects (9/11) received IFN-α switching therapy. Combination therapy with IFN-α and ComTNsNt was administered in the first 4 weeks. Then, ComTNsNt was discontinued at the end of Week 4, and IFN-α monotherapy was continued for 6 months. Two (2/11) patients discontinued ComTNsNt without receiving IFN-α treatment. All 11 patients received the first re-treatment of IFN-α when they experienced hepatitis relapses after the withdrawal of IFN-α or ComTNsNt. Six (6/11) patients received a second re-treatment of IFN-α. Follow up was conducted after IFN-α therapy in all 11 patients.

RESULTS

Two patients (2/9) receiving IFN-α switching therapy experienced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare. In contrast, the two patients without IFN-α switching therapy experienced ALT flare. Multiple re-treatments with IFN-α resulted in a sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-α switching therapy and IFN-α re-treatment might be applied for treatment of ComTNsNt failure. IFN-α switching therapy resulted in safe ComTNsNt cessation, and IFN-α re-treatment induced a sustained response of IFN-α in all patients. This IFN-α treatment is an optional treatment for ComTNsNt failure.

Current and future antiviral drug therapies of hepatitis B chronic infection

Despite significant improvement in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) it remains a public health problem, affecting more than 350 million people worldwide. The natural course of the infection is dynamic and involves a complex interplay between the virus and the host’s immune system. Currently the approved therapeutic regimens include pegylated-interferon (IFN)-α and monotherapy with five nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Both antiviral treatments are not capable to eliminate the virus and do not establish long-term control of infection after treatment withdrawal. IFN therapy is of finite duration and associates with low response rates, liver decompensating and numerous side effects. NAs are well-tolerated therapies but have a high risk of drug resistance development that limits their prolonged use. The imperative for the development of new approaches for the treatment of chronic HBV infection is a challenging issue that cannot be over-sided. Research efforts are focusing on the identification and evaluation of various viral replication inhibitors that target viral replication and a number of immunomodulators that aim to restore the HBV specific immune hyporesponsiveness without inducing liver damage. This review brings together our current knowledge on the available treatment and discusses potential therapeutic approaches in the battle against chronic HBV infection.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon α2a in patients without HBeAg loss after the withdrawal of long-term lamivudine therapy

Background

Improving the HBe seroconversion rate of patients without HBeAg loss after long-term lamivudine therapy has become an urgent clinical problem that we have to face. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the mananement of these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) α2a in patients without HBeAg loss after the withdrawal of long-term lamivudine therapy.

Methods

Fifty patients with chronic hepatitis B without the loss of HBeAg after ≥96 weeks of lamivudine treatment were enrolled to withdraw from treatment to induce a biochemical breakthrough. Patients who achieved a biochemical breakthrough within 24 weeks received 48-weeks of PEG-IFN α2a therapy, and were then assessed during a subsequent 24-week follow-up period.

Results

Forty-three (86.0%) patients achieved a biochemical breakthrough within 24 weeks of lamivudine withdrawal. The rates of combined response (both undetectable HBV DNA and HBeAg loss) and HBsAg loss were alone 51.2% and 20.9%, respectively after 48 weeks of PEG-IFN α2a therapy, and 44.2% and 18.6%, respectively, at 24 weeks after treatment cessation. The end-of-treatment combined response rate was 65.4% among patients with a baseline HBsAg <20,000 IU/mL, which was significantly higher than 29.4% of patients with HBsAg ≥20,000 IU/mL (P=0.031). For patients with HBsAg levels <1,500 IU/mL at 12 and 24 weeks therapy, the end-of-treatment combined response rate was 68.2% and 69.0%, which were both significantly higher than patients with HBsAg ≥1,500 IU/mL (33.3% and 14.3%; P=0.048 and 0.001). The end-of-treatment combined response rate was significantly higher among patients with HBV DNA<10⁵ copies/mL (76.2%) compared to patients with HBV DNA ≥10⁵ copies/mL (27.3%) after 24 weeks of therapy (P=0.004).

Conclusion

Retreatment with PEG-IFN α2a was effective and safe for patients without HBeAg loss after the withdrawal of long-term lamivudine therapy. HBsAg levels at the baseline, 12 and 24 weeks of therapy, and HBV DNA levels at 24 weeks of therapy, can predict the effect of PEG-IFN α2a after 48 weeks of therapy.

Effect of conventional interferon-α in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although a few studies have tested the effect of interferon-α on chronic hepatitis B, its treatment effect remains uncertain, and the association of treatment effect with intervention characteristics has not been thoroughly explored. This study examined the effect of IFN-α in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, and investigated the characteristics associated with treatment effect.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Scientific Citation Index, Current Content Connect, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and Chinese Biomedical Database, all up to 15 September 2009. We included randomized trials comparing IFN-α to placebo, no treatment, or standard care (SC) in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, independently and in duplicate. We conducted meta-analyses of the included studies, and subgroup analyses to examine the association of pre-specified characteristics (eg, dose, treatment duration) with treatment effect.

RESULTS

A total of 31 randomized controlled trials, involving 2164 patients, were included. The risk of bias varied across studies. Compared with placebo, no treatment, or SC, IFN-α improved loss of HBeAg (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.83 to 3.04), HBV DNA undetectability (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.32), HBeAg seroconversion (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.62), ALT normalization (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.56), and loss of HBsAg (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.91). Treatment effects differed in high versus low dose, and long versus short duration of IFN-α. The effect of high dose IFN-α (OR 3.28, 95% CI 2.31 to 4.66) is statistically larger than that of low dose IFN-α (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.28) on loss of HBeAg (interaction P = 0.017), and longer IFN-α treatment durations produce greater effects (OR 3.28, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.00) than do shorter durations (OR 1.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.66, interaction P = 0.038). High dose IFN-α had a significant effect on HBV DNA undetectability (OR 2.80, 95% CI 2.03 to 3.86), while low dose IFN-α did not (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.41, interaction P = 0.01); longer treatments significantly improved HBV DNA undetectability (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.62 to 4.12), but shorter durations did not (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, interaction P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-α can improve serological, biomedical, and virological response. Higher doses and prolonged treatments appear to have larger treatment benefits than lower doses and shorter treatments. However, the increased adverse reactions and costs associated with higher doses and prolonged treatment warrant caution in applying these results.

Revisão sistemática da eficácia do interferon alfa (convencional, peguilado) e lamivudina para o tratamento da hepatite crônica B

A hepatite crônica B constitui um grave problema de saúde pública e vem demonstrando crescentes gastos com financiamento de medicamentos de dispensação em caráter excepcional e de alto custo no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a eficácia do interferon (convencional; peguilado - PEG2a) e lamivudina (LAM) para o tratamento da hepatite crônica B, pelo método de revisão sistemática selecionando ensaios clínicos randomizados e controlados identificados nas bases PubMed e LILACS. As medidas de resultado consideradas foram resposta virológica, soroconversão, resposta bioquímica, resposta histológica e efeitos adversos. Foram selecionados 35 artigos. A presença ou ausência do HBeAg e os níveis de alanina amino transferase (ALT) no pré-tratamento demonstraram papel fundamental na indicação terapêutica inicial. O tratamento com interferons convencionais permite a inativação da doença por longos períodos de tempo, podendo resultar em soroconversão HBsAg. O PEG 2a demonstrou eficácia superior ao interferon e LAM e efeitos colaterais semelhantes ao interferon. A LAM apresenta vantagem de ser sensível para os pacientes HBeAg negativo e apresenta como maior desvantagem o desenvolvimento de resistência.

High rates of HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients responding to interferon: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess the HBsAg seroconversion rate and its impact on the long-term outcome in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with conventional interferon, and to analyze the serum HBsAg concentration prior to seroconversion.

METHODS

Ninety-seven HBeAg-positive patients were retrospectively evaluated. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable serum HBV-DNA 48 weeks after treatment discontinuation. HBsAg level was assessed at yearly intervals until seroconversion in SVRs.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (26%) achieved SVR. By multivariate analysis, SVR was associated with low serum HBV DNA level and severe liver fibrosis. During a median follow-up of 14 years (range, 5-20 years), 28 patients (29%) developed HBsAg seroconversion including 16 SVRs (64%) and 12 non-SVRs (16%), p < 0.001. HBsAg quantification showed a major decrease (median = 46%, range = 19-100%) in the first year after interferon starting in SVR patients. Six patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, none of them had undergone HBsAg seroconversion. Liver fibrosis improved in 70% of patients with HBsAg seroconversion compared to 30% of those without HBsAg seroconversion (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg seroconversion is achieved with a high steady rate in patients responding to interferon, and associated with excellent outcome. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the utility of on-treatment quantitative serum HBsAg in interferon-based therapy.

Interferons and their use in persistent viral infections

In 2007, the world celebrated the 50th anniversary of the discovery of interferon (IFN) by Isaacs and Lindenmann. Subsequently, the IFN-alpha gene was cloned, fully sequenced and IFN-alpha was produced in recombinant form. Recombinant IFN-alpha is now used as the basis for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection and can also be used to treat certain forms of chronic hepatitis B virus infections. IFNs have also been used in other viral infections, although with less success. The antiviral mechanisms of IFNs are reviewed in this chapter as well as the utility of IFNs in the treatment of persistent viral infections.

Demonstration of an association between detection of IgG antibody reactivity towards the C-terminal region of the preS1 protein of hepatitis B virus and the capacity to respond to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains complex, with somewhat unpredictable responses. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of the pretreatment presence of circulatory antibodies towards a synthetic peptide mimicking the amino acids 94-117 of the preS1 protein of HBV and the capacity to respond to alpha-inteferon (IFN-alpha) treatment.

METHODS

The anti preS1(94-117) antibodies were measured by a peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the response to INF-alpha therapy was judged by the effect on the viral kinetics as measured by an assay based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction during the treatment and follow up.

RESULTS

We found a significant (P < 0.001) correlation between the pretreatment presence of anti preS1(94-117) antibodies and a decrease in viral levels on follow up after the end of IFN-alpha therapy. The combined response of HBV DNA suppression (P < 0.001), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss (P < 0.0001), anti-HBe seroconversion (P < 0.005) and AST aminotransferase normalization (P < 0.01) was also highly associated with the pretreatment presence of anti preS1(94-117) antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The positive predictive value (PPV) of anti preS1(94-117) in determining a virological response was 83% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, indicating that in the absence of pretreatment anti preS1 reactivity virtually no patient has the capacity to respond to IFN-alpha therapy. Our findings may help to improve the efficacy of INF-alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by guiding the selection of patients for treatment and optimizing the clinical management of the individual patient.

Reviews for APASL guidelines: immunomodulator therapy of chronic hepatitis B

The primary aim of immunomodulator therapy is to help the natural human immune system to mount a defense against hepatitis B virus. IFN-alpha has been used for the treatment of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for over two decades and has been shown to be effective in suppressing HBV replication and in inducing serological response leading to long-term clinical benefits. IFN-alpha has been used in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis with comparable or better response to that in non-cirrhotic patients. IFN-alpha therapy in patients with cirrhosis has a similar side effect profile as in those without cirrhosis. However, IFN-alpha is contraindicated in patients with overt or decompensated cirrhosis. Pegylated IFN-alpha has been shown to be effective in treatment of chronic hepatitis B with sustained response rate in about one-third of the treated patients. Peg IFN-alpha treatment in non-responders to lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil showed similar response rate to that seen in naïve patients. Thymosin alpha(1) is effective in treatment of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with a significantly increasing virological response over time after therapy.

Therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Currently available options for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection include standard and pegylated interferon alfa and four oral antiviral agents (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine). These treatment strategies are either therapies of finite duration that aim to achieve sustained off-therapy responses, or long-term treatments that aim to maintain on-therapy remission. Pegylated interferon alfa may offer higher sustained off-therapy responses after 1 year, but most patients do not respond. Oral antivirals are the only candidates for long-term treatment of patients with chronic HBV infection. Viral suppression has favourable effects on patients' outcome and modifies the natural history of the disease. Viral resistance is the main drawback of long-term antiviral therapy. Lamivudine monotherapy is associated with higher resistance (year 1, 10-27%; year 2, 37-48%; year 4, 60-65%) than adefovir (year 1, 0%; year 2, 3%; year 5, 29%) or telbivudine (year 1, 3-4%; year 2, 9-22%). Entecavir resistance is rare in naive individuals (year 4, <1%), but increases over time in lamivudine-resistant patients (year 4, 43%). The best strategy for long-term therapy in chronic HBV infection has yet to be established.

Identification of natural compounds with anti-hepatitis B virus activity from Rheum palmatum L. ethanol extract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a severe health problem in the world; however, there is still no satisfactory therapeutic strategy for the HBV infection. In search for new anti-HBV agents with higher efficiency and less side effects, the anti-HBV activities of traditional Chinese medicine Rheum palmatum L. ethanol extract (RPE) and isolated anthraquinones were evaluated.

METHODS

The anti-HBV activities of RPE and isolated anthraquinones were demonstrated in a stable HBV-producing cell line HepG2 2.2.15 by using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Southern blot analysis.

RESULTS

RPE could inhibit HBV-DNA production and HBsAg expression in a dose-dependent manner. The concentration of 50% HBV-DNA inhibition (IC(50)) of RPE was calculated at 212.36 +/- 11 microg/ml. Six anthraquinones were isolated from RPE by using RP-HPLC. Five free anthraquinones showed weakly or slightly inhibitory activities against HBV. The only combined anthraquinone chrysophanol 8-O-beta-D-glucoside exhibited significant activity against HBV DNA production and antigens expression with an IC(50) value of 36.98 +/- 2.28 microg/ml on HBV DNA inhibition. Endogenous HBV DNA polymerase activity assay indicated that chrysophanol 8-O-beta-D-glucoside might be a potential inhibitor of the HBV DNA polymerase.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that RPE could effectively inhibit HBV. The combined anthraquinone chrysophanol 8-O-beta-D-glucoside is the major active compound in RPE and could be a promising candidate for the development of new anti-HBV drugs in the treatment of HBV infection.

Future prospectives for the management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection affects about 400 million people around the globe and causes approximately one million deaths a year. Since the discovery of interferon-α as a therapeutic option the treatment of hepatitis B has evolved fast and management has become increasingly complicated. The amount of viral replication reflected in the viral load (HBV-DNA) plays an important role in the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The current treatment modalities for chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulatory (interferons) and antiviral suppressants (nucleoside and nucleotide analogues) all with their own advantages and limitations. An overview of the treatment efficacy for both immunomodulatory as antiviral compounds is provided in order to provide the clinician insight into the factors influencing treatment outcome. With nucleoside or nucleotide analogues suppression of viral replication by 5-7 log₁₀ is feasible, but not all patients respond to therapy. Known factors influencing treatment outcome are viral load, ALT levels and compliance. Many other factors which might influence treatment are scarcely investigated. Identifying the factors associated with response might result in stopping rules, so treatment could be adapted in an early stage to provide adequate treatment and avoid the development of resistance. The efficacy of compounds for the treatment of mutant virus and the cross-resistance is largely unknown. However, genotypic and phenotypic testing as well as small clinical trials provided some data on efficacy in this population. Discontinuation of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues frequently results in viral relapse; however, some patients have a sustained response. Data on the risk factors for relapse are necessary in order to determine when treatment can be discontinued safely. In conclusion: chronic hepatitis B has become a treatable disease; however, much research is needed to tailor therapy to an individual patient, to predict the sustainability of response and determine the best treatment for those failing treatment.

Natural course, therapeutic options and economic evaluation of therapies for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection afflicts 400 million people worldwide and untreated will progress to cirrhosis in 15-40% of individuals, with an associated increased risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The 'inactive carrier state' carries a benign prognosis with a very low risk of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis state is an active disease state with increased risk for progressing to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The HBeAg-negative mutant variety of chronic hepatitis B has been associated with a higher incidence of cirrhosis at initial presentation and more frequent progression to hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the wild-type hepatitis B. Five medications are currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and peginterferon-alpha-2a. Interferon-alpha therapy has been shown to increase the rate of HBeAg and hepatitis B DNA loss with a small chance of hepatitis B surface antigen loss, but has significant adverse effects and is ineffective against the HBeAg-negative mutant. Lamivudine is a safely used, orally administered drug with good efficacy, but is associated with the development of a lamivudine-resistant (Lam-R) mutant in a large proportion of patients after long-term therapy. High relapse rates after lamivudine therapy make this medication less effective in the HBeAg-negative mutant also. Adefovir dipivoxil is a safely used, orally administered drug, which is effective against the Lam-R mutant. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective against the wild-type and HBeAg-negative hepatitis B and has a very low incidence of resistance development. Entecavir is a highly potent and selective new oral drug against hepatitis B. It has demonstrated no resistance development in treatment-naive patients, but a low incidence of resistance in patients infected with prior Lam-R mutants. Peginterferon-alpha-2a is administered once weekly and has improved efficacy compared with standard interferon-alpha and lamivudine. However, it has a similar adverse-effect profile to standard interferon-alpha. Pharmacoeconomic studies have demonstrated a cost benefit in treating chronic hepatitis B patients compared with no therapy. However, results have been conflicting, with earlier studies showing a cost advantage of lamivudine over interferon-alpha and a more recent, comprehensive study favouring interferon-alpha monotherapy in HBeAg-negative patients and adefovir dipivoxil 'salvage' after lamivudine resistance development in HBeAg-positive patients.

Interferon therapy in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis reduces progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The long-term outcomes of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seropositive patients remain controversial. This study was conducted to address this issue.

METHODS

The long-term outcomes were compared in 233 IFN-treated patients and 233 well-matched untreated controls.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence at the end of 15 years of follow-up (median 6.8 years, range 1.1-16.5 years) in the IFN-treated patients and controls was: HBeAg seroconversion 74.6% vs. 51.7% (P=0.031); hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance 3% vs. 0.4% (P=0.03); cirrhosis 17.8% vs. 33.7% (P=0.041); and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2.7% vs. 12.5% (P=0.011). Significant reduction of HCC was only observed in patients with pre-existing cirrhosis (P<0.01). Compared with untreated controls with persistent HBeAg, HBeAg seroconverters in untreated and IFN-treated group showed significantly lower incidence of cirrhosis and HCC (P=0.003-0.031), while non-seroconverters of IFN-treated group had marginally significant lower incidence of cirrhosis (P=0.065). Multivariate analysis showed that IFN therapy, HBeAg seroconversion and genotype B HBV infection are independent factors for better long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN therapy reduces cirrhosis and HCC development.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in chronic hepatitis delta

Therapy of chronic hepatitis delta with standard interferon therapy has met with limited efficacy. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of peginterferon with or without ribavirin. Thirty-eight serum hepatitis B surface antigen- and HDV RNA-positive patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than 1.5 times the upper normal limit received peginterferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg) alone as monotherapy (n=16) or in combination with ribavirin (n=22), for 48 weeks. Thereafter, all the patients were maintained on peginterferon for 24 weeks and followed for 24 weeks off therapy. The primary end point studied was the virological and biochemical response at the end of follow-up. HDV RNA was determined by single or nested polymerase chain reaction assays. Twenty-seven patients (71%), 11 receiving monotherapy and 16 receiving the combination treatment, completed the follow-up. At the end of treatment, a virological response was observed in 3 of the patients treated with peginterferon (19%) and in 2 of the patients treated with combination therapy (9%), and a biochemical response was observed in 6 (37.5%) and 9 patients (41%), respectively. In nonresponders, ALT diminished from a mean of 174+/-53 to 86+/-41 IU/L. At the end of follow-up, serum HDV RNA was negative in 8 patients (21%), and a biochemical response was detected in 10 patients (26%). Treatment was discontinued in 25% of the patients, and dosing was modified in 58%. In conclusion, a prolonged course of peginterferon alpha-2b resulted in clearance of serum HDV RNA and ALT normalization in a fifth of patients with chronic hepatitis D, while ribavirin had no effect on the viral clearance rate. Overall tolerance of therapy was poor.

Established and emerging therapies for the treatment of viral hepatitis

Patients who are chronically infected with either hepatitis B or C viruses run the risk of developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in later life. Antiviral treatment offers the only means of interrupting this progression. To date, recombinant interferon alpha and the nucleos(t)ide analogues lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil are the only licensed drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, whilst recombinant or pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin are the ones used for chronic hepatitis C virus infections. The efficacy of these treatments, reasons for treatment failure, drug resistance and future options are discussed in the present review.

Interferon-alpha2a is sufficient for promoting dendritic cell immunogenicity

Type I interferons (IFNs) are widely used therapeutically. IFN-alpha2a in particular is used as an antiviral agent, but its immunomodulatory properties are poorly understood. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the only antigen-presenting cells able to prime naive T cells and therefore play a crucial role in initiating the adaptive phase of the immune response. We studied the effects of IFN-alpha2a on DC maturation and its role in determining Th1/Th2 equilibrium. We found that IFN-alpha2a induced phenotypic maturation of DCs and increased their allostimulatory capacity. When dendritic cells were stimulated simultaneously by CD40 ligation and IFN-alpha2a, the production of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12 was increased. In contrast, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation in the presence of IFN-alpha2a mainly induced IL-10 release. The production of IFN-gamma and IL-5 by the responder naive T cells was also amplified in response to IFN-alpha2a-treated DCs. Furthermore, IL-12 production by IFN-alpha2a-treated DCs was enhanced further in the presence of anti-IL-10 antibody. Different results were obtained when DCs were treated simultaneously with IFN-alpha2a and other maturation factors, in particular LPS, and then stimulated by CD40 ligation 36 h later. Under these circumstances, IFN-alpha2a did not modify the DC phenotype, and the production of IL-10/IL-12 and IFN-gamma/IL-5 by DCs and by DC-stimulated naive T cells, respectively, was inhibited compared to the effects on DCs treated with maturation factors alone. Altogether, this work suggests that IFN-alpha2a in isolation is sufficient to promote DC activation, however, other concomitant events, such as exposure to LPS during a bacterial infection, can inhibit its effects. These results clarify some of the in vivo findings obtained with IFN-alpha2a and have direct implications for the design of IFN-alpha-based vaccines for immunotherapy.

Influence of HLA-DRB1 alleles and HBV genotypes on interferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B

AIM: To investigate the influence of HLA-DRB₁ alleles and HBV genotypes on interferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS: HLA-DRB1*03, *07, *09, *12, *15 alleles were determined using polymerase chain reaction/sequence specific primer (PCR/SSP) technique in 126 patients with chronic hepatitis B and 76 normal control subjects in Shandong Province, and HBV genotypes were determined by nested-PCR analysis using type-specific primers in 126 patients.

RESULTS: The positivity of HLA-DRB1*07 allele in chronic hepatitis B group was significantly higher than that in normal control group (χ² = 6.33, P < 0.025, RR = 2.37). Among the 126 patients, genotype B was found in 38 (30.2%), genotype C in 69 (54.8%), and mixed genotype (B+C) in 19 (15.0%), genotypes D-F were not found. Among the 46 DRB1*07(+) patients, 7 were responders and 39 were non-responders among them (χ² = 6.71, P < 0.05). The positivity of HLA-DRB1*07 and prevalence of HBV genotype C were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders.

CONCLUSION: High positivities of HLA-DRB1 ^*07 allele and HBV genotype C are closely associated with the lower response to interferon-α therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A large amount of new data on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B has become available such that the 2003 consensus statement requires revision and update.

METHODS

New data were presented, discussed and debated in an expert pre-meeting to draft a revision. The revised contents were finalized after discussion in a general meeting of APASL.

RESULTS

Conceptual background, including the efficacy and safety profile of currently available and emerging drugs, was reviewed. Nineteen recommendations were formed and unresolved issues and areas for further study were suggested.

CONCLUSION

The current therapy of chronic hepatitis B is modestly effective but not satisfactory. The development of new drugs and new strategies is required to further improve the outcomes of treatment.

Emerging treatments in chronic hepatitis B

Although the management of chronic hepatitis B has improved over the last decade, none of the available therapeutic agents, IFN-alpha, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, can achieve sustained off-therapy responses in most cases. Therefore, several newer, mainly antiviral and immunomodulatory agents, are being evaluated. Pegylated IFN-alpha(2a) has been shown to be more effective than lamivudine or standard IFN-alpha monotherapy in achieving post-therapy biochemical and virological responses, and is expected to be licensed soon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Newer antiviral agents, such as entecavir and telbivudine, appear to be quite effective initially, but their sustained off-therapy response rates remain unknown. The preliminary data of monotherapies with immunomodulatory agents, or of combination therapies, have been rather disappointing. Long-term maintenance treatment with antiviral agent(s) with good safety and tolerability profiles and low resistance rates appears to be the most realistic future therapeutic option for most chronic hepatitis B patients.

Current therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Patients who are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus are at an increased risk of developing cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic intervention offers the only means of interrupting this progression. Currently there are three licensed agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. These are interferon-alpha, an immunomodulator, and two synthetic nucleos(t)ide analogs, namely lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline) and adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences). This review aims to summarize current experience with these drugs in the treatment and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, their efficacy, and current problems of drug resistance. An outline of future treatment perspectives is also included.

Management of chronic hepatitis B in treatment-experienced patients

Current monotherapy with interferon (IFN), lamivudine, or adefovir remains unsatisfactory for most patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. Prolonged treatment with lamivudine monotherapy is needed in most patients with chronic hepatitis B infection and leads to an increased risk of developing lamivudine resistance. Recent data suggest that lamivudine resistance occasionally can result in serious clinical sequelae. On the other hand, conventional IFN treatment is ineffective in up to 70% of chronic hepatitis B patients. Adefovir resistance, although less frequent than lamivudine resistance,also has been identified. With the introduction of new nucleoside/nucleotide analogs such as entacavir, clevudine, LFd4C,tenofovir, and immunomodulatory agents such as pegylated IFN, new treatment options, either alone or in combination, are being investigated to increase the response rate in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients.

Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem, with 2 billion people infected worldwide, and 350 million suffering from chronic HBV infection. The 10th leading cause of death worldwide, HBV infections result in 500 000 to 1.2 million deaths per year caused by chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma; the last accounts for 320 000 deaths per year. In Western countries, the disease is relatively rare and acquired primarily in adulthood, whereas in Asia and most of Africa, chronic HBV infection is common and usually acquired perinatally or in childhood. More efficacious treatments, mass immunization programs, and safe injection techniques are essential for eliminating HBV infection and reducing global HBV-related morbidity and mortality. Safe and effective vaccines against HBV infection have been available since 1982. The implementation of mass immunization programs, which have been recommended by the World Health Organization since 1991, have dramatically decreased the incidence of HBV infection among infants, children, and adolescents in many countries. However, not all countries have adopted these recommendations and there remains a large number of persons that were infected with HBV prior to the implementation of immunization programs. Antiviral treatment is the only way to reduce morbidity and mortality from chronic HBV infection. Conventional interferon alfa and lamivudine have been the primary treatments to date. Conventional interferon alfa produces a durable response in a moderate proportion of patients but has undesirable side-effects and must be administered subcutaneously three times per week. Lamivudine also produces a response in a modest proportion of patients and causes few side-effects. However, prolonged treatment is often necessary to prevent relapse on cessation of therapy, and continuous treatment can lead to the development of lamivudine resistance. Promising emerging new treatments include adefovir, entecavir and peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa).

Review article: current management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B can be diagnosed in patients with increased aminotransferases, hepatitis B virus viraemia and necroinflammation with fibrosis on liver biopsy. Although, ideally, all patients with chronic hepatitis B should be treated, therapeutic intervention is currently recommended for cases with a relatively satisfactory likelihood of response and/or advanced disease. A realistic therapeutic approach aims to sustain hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss and hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe) seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and to sustain biochemical and virological remission in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Currently, three drugs are licensed for chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, all of these drugs achieve HBeAg loss (24-33%) and anti-HBe seroconversion (12-30%) rates significantly superior to those observed in untreated placebo controls. In patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, the sustained off-therapy response rate is 20-25% after a > or =12-month course of interferon-alpha and minimal (<10%), if any, after a 12-month course of lamivudine or adefovir. Long-term lamivudine induces an initial response in 70-90% of patients, but only 30-40% of patients remain in remission after the third year due to progressively increasing viral resistance. Long-term adefovir achieves a response in approximately 70% of patients at 12 months, which is maintained at 24 months with rare (<2%) drug resistance. Adefovir is also effective against lamivudine-resistant strains. Many other anti-viral agents, immunomodulatory approaches and combination therapies are currently being evaluated in chronic hepatitis B.

Short- and long-term effects of treatment of chronic hepatitis B and delta virus by IFN

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common infectious disease in the world. Two percent of the patients with chronic HBV infection will develop cirrhosis each year, and will die prematurely from cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. So far interferon alfa and lamivudine are the only effective drugs. Interferon alfa can be used at the dosage of 9-10 million units thrice a week for 4-6 months either intramuscularly or subcutaneously for standard treatment. Interferon provides sustained response in 1/3 of the patients when HBe Ag is (+). Response rate to interferon therapy in HBe Ag(-) patients was similar to that reported in HBe Ag(+) ones. However the responses were not sustained in many patients, serum HBV-DNA reappear in most after stopping the treatment. Extension of therapy to 1 year may be needed in patients who are unresponsive to therapy and having HBV-DNA levels <10 pg/ml and ALT >100 IU. Establishment of unresponsiveness in early phases of the therapy is important and careful follow up of serum HBe Ag may be helpful. Interferon alfa treatment of chronic HDV infection may result in temporary normalization of ALT values. Disappearance of HBV-DNA and HBs Ag from the serum upon completion of therapy dictates sustained response in chronic HDV infection. The long term effect of interferon with respect to virological and histopathological responses is poor in HDV infection and longer periods of therapy in higher doses may be beneficial.

Lamivudine and 24 weeks of lamivudine/interferon combination therapy for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B in interferon nonresponders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Lamivudine is effective in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B, but its role in interferon nonresponders has not been described. We assessed lamivudine treatment, with or without added interferon, in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B who had failed interferon therapy previously.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to lamivudine (100 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks or to a 24-week regimen of lamivudine plus interferon. Primary treatment comparisons were at week 52, with a 16-week posttreatment follow-up period. Measurements included histology (primary endpoint), HBeAg response, normalization of alanine aminotransferase, reduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, and safety.

RESULTS

Among 238 patients, histologic response was significantly more common in patients treated with lamivudine (52 versus placebo 25%, P=0.002) or the combination regimen (32%, P=0.01). HBeAg loss was also more common with lamivudine (33 versus 13 versus 21%), as were virologic and alanine aminotransferase responses. Among 28 subjects with HBeAg loss/seroconversion, 71% had durable responses 16 weeks posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine for 52 weeks is as effective in interferon nonresponders as in previously reported treatment-naive patients; however, a combination of lamivudine for 24 weeks and interferon for 16 weeks was not effective in this population.

Serum HBV DNA as a marker of efficacy during therapy for chronic HBV infection: analysis and review of the literature

Currently, compounds under evaluation for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are evaluated with liver histology as the primary end point for efficacy. However, because of practical limitations in serial liver biopsies, there is a need for alternate markers to assess efficacy over shorter periods of time. Considering the direct correlation between viral replication and disease progression during human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection, we explored whether such a correlation exists for HBV infection. We reviewed the literature and conducted an analysis to investigate the relationship between absolute or treatment-induced changes in HBV DNA levels and other accepted markers of disease activity. A total of 26 prospective studies met our selection criteria, including 33 evaluable treatment arms. The study treatments consisted of nucleosides and/or interferon regimens and control arms. We found statistically significant and consistent correlations between viral load level or change and histologic grading and biochemical and serologic response. Our analysis suggests that a treatment-induced reduction in HBV DNA level can be used for assessing efficacy of treatment regimens. Further, we observed that quantitative HBV DNA has a broader dynamic range than histology, allowing demonstration of differences between 2 active treatments of unequal potency. The analysis showed stronger results in studies using nucleoside regimens and in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients. In conclusion, the goal of anti-HBV therapy should be profound and durable viral suppression, as defined by very sensitive assays. Additional prospective studies are needed to precisely determine the desirable level of viremia to attain.

A pilot study of beta-interferon for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who failed to respond to alpha-interferon

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Alpha-interferon achieves persistent loss of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in about 30-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis B. In non-responder patients, the disease may progress leading to complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of beta-interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B who did not respond to one course of alpha-interferon.

METHODS

Twenty nine alpha-interferon-non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis B (11 hepatitis B e antigen, HBeAg-positive; 18 HBeAg-negative) were treated with 6 million units beta-interferon five times a week for 24 weeks. The post-treatment follow-up lasted for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, 38% of patients (18% HBeAg-positive; 50% HBeAg-negative) had normal serum aminotransferase levels and negative serum HBV DNA. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA was no longer detectable in serum in 21% of patients (18% HBeAg-positive; 22% HBeAg-negative). Beta-interferon was well tolerated and safe.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that beta-interferon therapy is effective and safe in the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had not responded to a previous alpha-interferon cycle.

Therapy of chronic hepatitis B: current challenges and opportunities

Better understanding of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, natural history and the immunopathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B, together with the introduction of effective agents with different mechanisms of action are the basis for better therapeutic strategies against chronic hepatitis B. Among currently available drugs, interferon-alpha and thymosin-alpha1 have only modest efficacy (approximately 40% vs 9-20% in controls). In the past decade, lamivudine has dominated in the treatment of chronic HBV infection because it is easy to use, safe, and is effective in terms of hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV-DNA loss, ALT normalization, and improvement in histology. The response rate increases with increasing pretherapy alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, suggesting that patients with stronger endogenous immune response against HBV have a better response to direct antiviral agents. Lamivudine is also beneficial in decompensated cirrhotics with HBV replication. Hepatitic flares may occur after stopping lamivudine therapy in nonresponders and also in responders. Therefore, prolonged therapy is usually required. However, tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations conferring resistance to lamivudine start to emerge after 6-9 months of therapy, and hepatitis flare, even decompensation, may develop after viral breakthrough. Thus the benefits of long-term lamivudine therapy must be balanced against the concern about YMDD mutations and the durability of treatment response. Adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, clevudine and other nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues have shown encouraging results and some agents appear effective in patients with YMDD mutants. Further development of new drugs and new strategies may help to improve treatment in the new century.

[Role of interferons in the treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections]

BACKGROUND

Since the discovery of hepatitis C (HCV), the efficacy of treatment has significantly progressed using standard mono-therapy: with Interferon alpha (IFN) during six months we obtained approximately 10% sustained response and currently with the association of pegylated IFN and Ribavirin a 55% sustained response was achieved.

CURRENT POSITION AND MAJOR POINTS

HCV infection continues to present therapeutic problems which have not entirely been solved, mainly related to clinical and biological tolerance, and non-responders. Moreover, the care of patients with extra-hepatic localization, cirrhotic patients, as well as therapeutic problems of co-infected HIV-HCV patients. As regards hepatitis B (HBV) new effective treatments against this virus have appeared, IFN then nucleoside analogs, some of which are available in France (i.e. lamivudine, adefovir, dipovoxil). The main objective of chronic hepatitis B treatment is to obtain the complete inhibition of the HBV virus by Hbe-antigen antibody seroconversion which would therefore significantly increase patient survival. In this article the advantages and disadvantages of the different treatments are assessed.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Despite the considerable and rapid progress obtained in the therapeutic treatment of infection due to HCV and HBV a number of unknown factors remain, which warrants further trials, in particular to evaluate the efficacy as well as the tolerance of the antiviral agent association.

The influence of baseline characteristics on viral dynamic parameters in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with lamivudine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Viral decline during lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients is bi-phasic. We studied the influence of lamivudine dose and baseline characteristics on parameters obtained from a mathematical model.

METHODS

Chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized to receive 150 mg (group 1; n=11) or 600 mg (group 2; n=10) lamivudine daily for 4 weeks. Hepatitis B virus DNA was measured frequently with the Digene Hybrid Capture II test and the Roche PCR assay.

RESULTS

The description of viral decline in our closely monitored patients by means of the mixed-effects approach with both the bi-phasic model and a piecewise linear regression model resulted in a good fit. Baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was significantly related to the slope of the second phase of viral decline. Previous lamivudine-treated patients showed a significant slower first phase than patients naive to lamivudine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial observed difference in viral decline between 150 and 600 mg of lamivudine disappeared when baseline ALT was taken into account. This strengthens the hypothesis that the level of intrinsic activity is related to the turnover of infected hepatocytes. Moreover, reintroduction of lamivudine in previously lamivudine-treated patients should be considered carefully.

Management of viral hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern and is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The natural history and clinical outcomes of chronic HBV infection are determined by the viral replication cycle and the host immune responses. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history by suppressing HBV replication before development of any significant irreversible liver cell damage. Effective antiviral therapies should be followed by sustained suppression of HBV-DNA, normalization of transaminases levels and a stable stage of HBeAg seroconversion with persistence of circulating anti-HBeAg antibodies. Two major classes of antiviral therapeutic agents that have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulating agents (i.e. interferon) and the nucleoside analogs (i.e. lamivudine). A 4-6 month course of interferon-alpha has resulted in improvement of survival in 20%-30% of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had elevated serum ALT levels without hepatic decompensation. Interferon-alpha therapy is associated with HBeAg seroconversion; normalization of ALT levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon can also be used with caution in patients with early compensated cirrhosis. A 12-month course of lamivudine has been shown to be well tolerated and effective. Lamivudine can be used in decompensated cirrhosis and immunosuppressed patients and for prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The response rates after 3 years of lamivudine therapy account for 40-65%. A major problem of antiviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD motif of HBV reverse transcriptase. The prevalence of YMDD mutations increases with longer durations of antiviral therapies and this has been detected in 20% of immunocompetent patients receiving lamivudine per year. Contentious issues remain when to stop the treatment if HBeAg seroconversion does not occur. Many new immunomodulatory therapies and antiviral agents are in various stages of clinical development and have shown some promise. Among newer HBV antivirals, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, DAPD and clevudine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. In vitro studies have shown that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine and emtricitabine. However, adefovir, dipivoxil, lobucavir, DAPD and possibly clevudine suppress replications of both YMDD mutants and wild types of HBV. Immunomodulatory approaches for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymosin-alpha, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. Combinations of an immunomodulatory agent and nucleoside analog may improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Nevertheless, combinations of interferon and lamivudine therapies do not confer such additional benefits. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to minimize the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of HBV. Randomized prospective control trials of combined antiviral therapies given simultaneously or sequentially are needed to establish safe and effective combined regimens that can be recommended for future treatment strategies.

Treatment of chronic viral hepatitis

Significant advances have been made in the treatment of both hepatitis B and C. Cure for the majority is becoming reality. Combination regimens are now established therapy in hepatitis C and the near future will see the adoption of a similar approach to hepatitis B. Interferon alpha therapy remains important, with the development of more efficacious pegylated forms. In this article we review current therapy and discuss future strategies of the therapy for chronic viral hepatitis.

Current treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B and C

For chronic hepatitis B, treatment with a 4-month course of interferon alfa-2b can achieve hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, normalization of aminotransferase levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced progression to cirrhosis and improvement in survival in 20%-30% of patients. Similar results can be achieved with a 12-month course of lamivudine, with response rates increasing to 40%-65% after 3 years of therapy. Interferon can also be used in early cirrhotic patients, and lamivudine can be used in advanced cirrhotics and immunosuppressed patients. Combination interferon and lamivudine therapy does not confer additional benefits. For chronic hepatitis C, the combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin is the treatment of choice, offering superior sustained response rates (40%) compared with interferon alone (15%). Therapy should be administered for 12 months to patients with genotype 1 virus but for only 6 months to patients with genotypes 2 and 3. Patients experiencing relapse after 6 months of interferon monotherapy can be re-treated with interferon and ribavirin or high-dose interferon, with 45%-56% sustained response rates. However, relatively few patients who are prior nonresponders to interferon monotherapy will have sustained response to further interferon-based treatments, including combination therapy with ribavirin. Successful therapy not only leads to the eradication of viral RNA but also may delay progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG), shows promise as an improved formulation of interferon with yet higher sustained response rates.

Biliary cancer growth factor pathways, cyclo-oxygenase-2 and potential therapeutic strategies

Cholangiocarcinoma is a hepatic biliary cancer of high morbidity and mortality, whose molecular pathogenesis is unknown. However, there is increasing evidence to suggest that alterations in selected growth factor pathways, including an overexpression of the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases c-ErbB-2/c-Neu and c-Met, together with possible aberrant autocrine expression of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, the ligand for c-Met, may be playing important roles associated with the development of cholangiocarcinoma in both the human liver and in the furan rat model of cholangiocarcinogenesis. Cyclo-oxygenase-2, whose regulation has been experimentally related to c-ErbB-2/c-Neu as well as to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, and which has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in other cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, has also been observed in preliminary studies to be upregulated in human biliary cancers and in cholangiocarcinoma induced in the furan rat model. Moreover, new data from our laboratory have demonstrated the cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 to produce a significant dose-dependent growth inhibition of rat cholangiocarcinoma cells in vitro, as well as to suppress anchorage-independent growth of these cells in soft agar. Based on the data reviewed, we propose that the selective therapeutic targeting of aberrant growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and of cyclo-oxygenase-2, alone or in combination, has potential to become a useful new approach for the treatment and/or chemoprevention of cholangiocarcinoma. We further propose that the furan rat model may serve as a powerful preclinical model for testing therapeutic and chemopreventative strategies that selectively target c-ErbB-2/c-Neu, cyclo-oxygenase-2, and/or autocrine hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met, aberrantly expressed in cholangiocarcinogenesis.

The prevention and management of viral hepatitis

In this review we will discuss advances in the primary and secondary prevention of viral hepatitis and the treatment for chronic viral hepatitis.

Hepatitis B

The hepatitis B virus is a hepatotropic virus that can produce a variety of clinical syndromes in patients ranging in age from infants to elderly adults. Worldwide, it is among the leading causes of fulminant hepatic failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent advances have led to effective antiviral treatments using interferon and nucleoside analogues. Highly effective vaccinations also are used widely and ultimately may lead to eradication of this life-threatening virus.

[Diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B]

Hepatitis B constitutes a serious public health problem. It has been estimated that 350 million people--approximately 5% of the world population--have been infected by this virus. Of the people infected, in 90% to 95% of them there will be a spontaneous resolution of the disease. In 5% to 10% of the cases, though, the infection will persist and a chronic hepatitis will develop that may evolve leading, in the end, to liver cirrhosis, liver failure and/or carcinoma of the liver. The diagnosis of the different stages of the disease (i.e., acute, chronic infection) is performed using modern serologic techniques. Physicians, more recently, are having access to a series of laboratory tests which permit them to evaluate the viral load, replication of the virus and to testing of the efficacy of new anti-viral drugs. For the treatment of chronic hepatitis B new agents have been tested and some are being used with different degrees of success, such as, alfa-interferon, lamivudine, famciclovir, and adefovir dipivoxil, among others. Active immunization, using modern recombinant vaccines, are lately, the most important instrument of control of the infection caused by the hepatitis B virus.

Viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis accounts for most liver diseases seen in hepatology practice. In the past year studies have been focused on uncovering the basic mechanisms of viral-cellular interactions, the knowledge of which will contribute to more effective treatment. Hepatitis A virus outbreaks still occur, even in the most developed countries, which points to the need for more comprehensive vaccination measures. Lessons learned from the treatment of HIV with combination antiviral therapies are being applied to both chronic hepatitis B and C. Progress has been made toward better understanding of viral kinetics and the quasi-species of hepatitis C virus with new and more sensitive diagnostic methods. Several therapeutic protocols are emerging to identify and tailor the management approach in various subsets of the population. Although posttransplantation hepatitis B has been more effectively managed with lamivudine therapy, no major advances have been accomplished in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C among transplant recipients. Major advances in the field of viral hepatitis including A to E and TT viruses during the past year are highlighted.

Hepatitis B

The management of acute HBV infection is supportive. Specific treatment is not indicated for HBV carriers because they often have no evidence of liver injury, and, further, do not respond to currently available therapies. Interferon monotherapy is best indicated for patients with chronic replicating HBV infection and evidence of chronic hepatitis. There is an increased likelihood of clearing HBsAg with interferon monotherapy as compared to lamivudine. Lamivudine is an oral nucleoside analog that is better tolerated than interferon. The clinical situations for its use are far more than interferon monotherapy. Lamivudine should be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and also in transplantation, both before and after transplantation. The post-transplant use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine combination therapy may be better for recipients who are identified in a replicative phase prior to transplantation. Hepatitis B coinfection with one or more viruses, HCV, HDV, or HIV, may occur. Both interferon and lamivudine have been useful in these patients. However, the data are sparse and heterogeneous. Therapy with one or both drugs will have to be tailored to the clinical situation. Combination therapy with immunomodulatory and/or antiviral drugs are what we will be looking toward in the future.