Ritonavir and Lopinavir Suppress RCE1 and CAAX Rab Proteins Sensitizing the Liver to Organelle Stress and Injury

Rab18 maintains homeostasis of subcutaneous adipose tissue to prevent obesity-induced metabolic disorders

Metabolically healthy obesity refers to obese individuals who do not develop metabolic disorders. These people store fat in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) rather than in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). However, the molecules participating in this specific scenario remain elusive. Rab18, a lipid droplet (LD)-associated protein, mediates the contact between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and LDs to facilitate LD growth and maturation. In the present study, we show that the protein level of Rab18 is specifically upregulated in the SAT of obese people and mice. Rab18 adipocyte-specific knockout (Rab18 AKO) mice had a decreased volume ratio of SAT to VAT compared with wildtype mice. When subjected to high-fat diet (HFD), Rab18 AKO mice had increased ER stress and inflammation, reduced adiponectin, and decreased triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in SAT. In contrast, TAG accumulation in VAT, brown adipose tissue (BAT) or liver of Rab18 AKO mice had a moderate increase without ER stress stimulation. Rab18 AKO mice developed insulin resistance and systematic inflammation. Rab18 AKO mice maintained body temperature in response to acute and chronic cold induction with a thermogenic SAT, similar to the counterpart mice. Furthermore, Rab18-deficient 3T3-L1 adipocytes were more prone to palmitate-induced ER stress, indicating the involvement of Rab18 in alleviating lipid toxicity. Rab18 AKO mice provide a good animal model to investigate metabolic disorders such as impaired SAT. In conclusion, our studies reveal that Rab18 is a key and specific regulator that maintains the proper functions of SAT by alleviating lipid-induced ER stress.

Risk of acute liver injury following the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use

BACKGROUND

Elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were reported as adverse events of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users in the EPIC-HR trial.

AIM

To quantify the risk and severity of acute liver injury (ALI) associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use.

METHODS

This self-controlled case-series study was conducted using electronic medical records of patients with confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection between 26th February 2022 and 12th February 2023 in Hong Kong.

RESULTS

Among 2 409 848 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period, 153 853 were prescribed with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, of whom 834 (.5%) had incident ALI (moderate: 30.5%; moderate to severe: 18.9%; severe or fatal: 5.8%). Compared with the non-exposure period, risk of ALI increased significantly during the pre-exposure period (IRR = 38.13, 95% CI = 29.29-49.62) and remained elevated during the five-day nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment (IRR = 20.75, 95% CI = 17.06-25.25) and during wash-out period (IRR = 16.27, 95% CI = 13.23-20.01). Compared to the pre-exposure period, risk of ALI was not increased during the five-day nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment period (IRR = .54, 95% CI = .43-.70). Compared to 5469 non-nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users with incident ALI, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users had less severe ALI by the severity index (p < .001) and peak INR (1.7 vs. 2.3; p < .001). ALI cases with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use had lower risk of all-cause death (29.1% vs. 39.1%; OR = .64; p < .001) and no increase in risk of liver decompensation (1.0% vs. 1.3%; OR = .62; p = .230) compared to non-users.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ALI associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment for COVID-19 was elevated in the pre-exposure period, but not following nirmatrelvir/ritonavir initiation. ALI following nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment were mostly mild and less severe than ALI events in non-nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users.

Molecular Factors and Pathways of Hepatotoxicity Associated with HIV/SARS-CoV-2 Protease Inhibitors

Antiviral protease inhibitors are peptidomimetic molecules that block the active catalytic center of viral proteases and, thereby, prevent the cleavage of viral polyprotein precursors into maturation. They continue to be a key class of antiviral drugs that can be used either as boosters for other classes of antivirals or as major components of current regimens in therapies for the treatment of infections with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, sustained/lifelong treatment with the drugs or drugs combined with other substance(s) often leads to severe hepatic side effects such as lipid abnormalities, insulin resistance, and hepatotoxicity. The underlying pathogenic mechanisms are not fully known and are under continuous investigation. This review focuses on the general as well as specific molecular mechanisms of the protease inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity involving transporter proteins, apolipoprotein B, cytochrome P450 isozymes, insulin-receptor substrate 1, Akt/PKB signaling, lipogenic factors, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase, pregnane X receptor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, reactive oxygen species, inflammatory cytokines, off-target proteases, and small GTPase Rab proteins related to ER-Golgi trafficking, organelle stress, and liver injury. Potential pharmaceutical/therapeutic solutions to antiviral drug-induced hepatic side effects are also discussed.

COVID-19-related liver injury: Focus on genetic and drug-induced perspectives

BACKGROUND

Empirical use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs in the management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is considered as one of the major etiopathogenetic factors for liver injury. Recent evidence has shown that an underlying genetic factor may also occur. Hence, it is important to understand the host genetics and iatrogenic-based mechanisms for liver dysfunction to make timely remedial measures.

AIM

To investigate drug-induced and genetic perspectives for the development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related liver injury.

METHODS

Reference Citation Analysis, PubMed, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched by employing the relevant MeSH keywords and pertaining data of the duration, site and type of study, sample size with any subgroups and drug-induced liver injury outcome. Genetic aspects were extracted from the most current pertinent publications.

RESULTS

In all studies, the hepatic specific aminotransferase and other biochemical indices were more than their prescribed upper normal limit in COVID-19 patients and were found to be significantly related with the gravity of disease, hospital stay, number of COVID-19 treatment drugs and worse clinical outcomes. In addition, membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 7 rs641738, rs11385942 G>GA at chromosome 3 gene cluster and rs657152 C>A at ABO blood locus was significantly associated with severity of livery injury in admitted SARS-CoV-2 patients.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 infection could be the result of individual drugs or due to drug-drug interactions and may be in a subset of patients with a genetic propensity. Thus, serial estimation of hepatic indices in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients should be done to make timely corrective actions for iatrogenic causes to avoid clinical deterioration. Additional molecular and translational research is warranted in this regard.

A Golgi-targeted viscosity rotor for monitoring early alcohol-induced liver injury

We proposed to monitor the early stage of alcohol-induced liver injury through quantitatively detecting Golgi viscosity. Therefore, the first Golgi-targeted fluorescent rotor (GA-Vis) was developed. With the aid of GA-Vis, the changes in Golgi viscosity during alcohol-induced liver injury were quantitatively evaluated by fluorescence lifetime imaging in live cells and zebrafish. GA-Vis was qualified as a practical tool for future diagnoses of alcohol-induced liver injury.

Adverse Effects of Anti-Covid-19 Drug Candidates and Alcohol on Cellular Stress Responses of Hepatocytes

During the pandemic, dexamethasone (DEX), remdesivir (RDV), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), thapsigargin (TG), camostat mesylate (CaM), and pralatrexate were repurposed drugs for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the side effects on the liver associated with the anti-COVID therapies are unknown. Cellular stresses by these drugs at 0-30 μM were studied using HepG2, Huh7, and/or primary human hepatocytes. DEX or RDV induced endoplasmic reticulum stress with increased X-box binding protein 1 and autophagic response with increased accumulation of microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3-II). DEX and RDV had additive effects on the stress responses in the liver cells, which further increased expression of activating transcription factor 4 and C/EBP homology protein 1 (CHOP), and cell death. Alcohol pretreatment (50 mM) and DEX induced greater cellular stress responses than DEX and RDV. Pralatrexate induced Golgi fragmentation, cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase, activations of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) and caspases, and cell death. Pralatrexate and alcohol had synergistic effects on the cell death mediators of Bim, caspase3, and PARP. The protease inhibitor CaM and TG induced autophagic response and mitochondrial stress with altered mitochondrial membrane potential, B-cell lymphoma 2, and cytochrome C. TG and HCQ induced autophagic response markers of Unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase, LC3-II, Beclin1, and Atg5, and severe ER stress marker CHOP. Conclusion: These results suggest that the anti-COVID-19 drugs, especially with drug-drug or alcohol-drug combinations, cause cellular stress responses and injuries in the liver cells.

Past and Future Strategies to Inhibit Membrane Localization of the KRAS Oncogene

KRAS is one of the most studied oncogenes. It is well known that KRAS undergoes post-translational modifications at its C-terminal end. These modifications are essential for its membrane location and activity. Despite significant efforts made in the past three decades to target the mechanisms involved in its membrane localization, no therapies have been approved and taken into the clinic. However, many studies have recently reintroduced interest in the development of KRAS inhibitors, either by directly targeting KRAS or indirectly through the inhibition of critical steps involved in post-translational KRAS modifications. In this review, we summarize the approaches that have been applied over the years to inhibit the membrane localization of KRAS in cancer and propose a new anti-KRAS strategy that could be used in clinic.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The severity of COVID-19 may be correlated with the risk of liver injury development. An increasing number of studies indicate that degrees of hepatotoxicity has been associated with using some medications in the management of COVID-19 patients. However, limited studies had systematically investigated the evidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in COVID-19 patients. Thus, this study aimed to examine DILI in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to December 30, 2020. Search items included "SARS-CoV-2", "Coronavirus," COVID-19, and liver injury. Results: We included 22 related articles. Among included studies, there was five case report, five case series, four randomizes control trial (RCT), seven cohort studies, and one cross-sectional study. The drugs included in this systematic review were remdesivir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir. Among included studies, some studies revealed a direct role of drugs, while others couldn't certainly confirm that the liver injury was due to SARS-CoV-2 itself or administration of medications. However, a significant number of studies reported that liver injury could be attributable to drug administration. Discussion: Liver injury in COVID-19 patients could be caused by the virus itself or the administration of some types of drug. Intensive liver function monitoring should be considered for patients, especially patients who are treated with drugs such as remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and tocilizumab.

COVID-19 infection and liver injury: Clinical features, biomarkers, potential mechanisms, treatment, and management challenges

It is hypothesized that liver impairment caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection might play a central role in severe clinical presentations. Liver injury is closely associated with severe disease and, even with antiviral drugs, have a poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients. In addition to the common hepatobiliary disorders caused by COVID-19, patients with pre-existing liver diseases demand special considerations during the current pandemic. Thus, it is vital that upon clinical presentation, patients with concurrent pre-existing liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction and COVID-19 be managed properly to prevent liver failure. Careful monitoring and early detection of liver damage through biomarkers after hospitalization for COVID-19 is underscored in all cases, particularly in those with pre-existing metabolic liver injury. The purpose of this study was to determine most recent evidence regarding causality, potential risk factors, and challenges, therapeutic options, and management of COVID-19 infection in vulnerable patients with pre-existing liver injury. This review aims to highlight the current frontier of COVID-19 infection and liver injury and the direction of liver injury in these patients.